Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business, Government and Economic Institutions in China 1st Edition Xiaoke Zhang full chapter instant download
Business, Government and Economic Institutions in China 1st Edition Xiaoke Zhang full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/unpacking-eu-policy-making-towards-
china-how-member-states-bureaucracies-and-institutions-shape-its-
china-economic-policy-1st-ed-edition-bas-hooijmaaijers/
https://ebookmass.com/product/american-government-institutions-
and-policies-sixteenth-edition-bose/
https://ebookmass.com/product/media-and-conflict-in-the-social-
media-era-in-china-1st-edition-shixin-ivy-zhang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-security-in-china-a-post-
pandemic-state-1st-edition-chi-zhang/
Managing Expatriates in China: A Language and Identity
Perspective 1st Edition Ling Eleanor Zhang
https://ebookmass.com/product/managing-expatriates-in-china-a-
language-and-identity-perspective-1st-edition-ling-eleanor-zhang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/how-trade-with-china-threatens-
western-institutions-the-economic-roots-of-a-political-
crisis-1st-edition-robert-gmeiner/
https://ebookmass.com/product/economic-transition-and-labor-
market-reform-in-china-1st-ed-edition-xinxin-ma/
https://ebookmass.com/product/american-government-institutions-
and-policies-16th-edition-ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/family-business-in-china-
volume-2-challenges-and-opportunities-1st-edition-chen/
International Political Economy Series
Edited by
Xiaoke Zhang and Tianbiao Zhu
International Political Economy Series
Series editor
Timothy M. Shaw
Visiting Professor
University of Massachusetts Boston, USA
Emeritus Professor
University of London, UK
The global political economy is in flux as a series of cumulative crises
impacts its organization and governance. The IPE series has tracked its
development in both analysis and structure over the last three decades. It
has always had a concentration on the global South. Now the South
increasingly challenges the North as the centre of development, also
reflected in a growing number of submissions and publications on indebted
Eurozone economies in Southern Europe. An indispensable resource for
scholars and researchers, the series examines a variety of capitalisms and
connections by focusing on emerging economies, companies and sectors,
debates and policies. It informs diverse policy communities as the estab-
lished trans-Atlantic North declines and ‘the rest’, especially the BRICS,
rise.
Business, Government
and Economic
Institutions in China
Editors
Xiaoke Zhang Tianbiao Zhu
Alliance Manchester Business School Institute for Advanced Study in
University of Manchester Humanities and Social Sciences
Manchester, UK Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
As editors, we wish to thank all the authors for their willingness to respond
to our editorial suggestions and their valuable contribution to the book.
We also extend our appreciation to Wyn Grant, Gregory Noble, Richard
Whitley, Yongping Wu and the anonymous reviewer for their comments,
criticisms and support. While organizing the international symposium in
August 2014 and the publication workshop in January 2016 from which
this book was born, we received and gratefully acknowledge financial sup-
port from China’s National Social Science Fund (project number:
13BJL027) and the Zhejiang University Research Fund (project number:
188020-193810401/054). Finally, we are grateful to Timothy Shaw, the
series editor, and Christina Brian, editorial director for politics and inter-
national studies at Palgrave Macmillan, for encouraging the project.
Xiaoke Zhang
Tianbiao Zhu
v
Contents
Part I Introduction 1
vii
viii CONTENTS
Index 345
Notes on Contributors
ix
x Notes on Contributors
xi
List of Tables
xiii
xiv LIST OF TABLES
Introduction
CHAPTER 1
Understanding Business–Government
Relations in China: Changes, Causes
and Consequences
Introduction
This book brings together conceptual and empirical analyses of the causes
and consequences of changing business–government relations in China
since the 1990s, against the backdrop of the country’s increased integra-
tion with the global political economy. More specifically, it provides an
interdisciplinary account of how the dominant pattern of interactions
between state actors, firms and business organizations has changed differ-
ently across regions and industries and how the changing varieties of these
interactions have causally interacted with the evolution of key economic
X. Zhang (*)
Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
T. Zhu
Institute for Advanced Study in Humanities and Social Sciences, Zhejiang
University, Hangzhou, China
Key Contributions
By focusing on the above-mentioned three analytical objectives, the book
is intended to make a number of contributions to current theoretical and
policy debates on the changing nature of business–government relations
and its impact on newly emerging economic institutions in China.
To begin with, existing studies of business–government relations in
China have tended to be narrow in theoretical focus and fragmented in
analytical perspectives. Some have shown political actors in the state domain
as the causal agents of changes in business–government interactions and
UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS–GOVERNMENT RELATIONS IN CHINA… 5
portrayed business actors and their organizations largely as passive and sub-
ordinate objects of control and co-optation through state corporatist
mechanisms (Alpermann 2006; Dickson 2003, 2008; Foster 2008; Ong
2012; Unger 2008a; Walder 1995, 2003). Others have granted analytical
primacy to the growing role of economic actors and firms in structuring
relations with the state and emphasized horizontal interactions mediated
through market institutions, business associations and social networks as an
important defining feature of state–firm relations (Nee 1992; Nee and
Opper 2012; Peng 2004; Sun, Wright and Mellahi 2010; Tjosvold et al.
2008; Xin and Pearce 1996). Still others have sought to advance a micro-
theory of business and politics that explains the motivation of individual
firms to develop connections with various party and governmental entities,
the choices they make on tactics and strategies, and the impact of political
ties on their performance (Du and Girma 2010; Guo et al. 2014; Li et al.
2006; Park and Luo 2001; Peng and Luo 2000).
While these approaches shed important light on the manifestations and
consequences of changing business–government relations in China, they
do not exhaust the categories of potential patterns of such relations. They
have mainly concentrated on one set of analytical dimensions, largely to
the exclusion of others that are constitutive of interactions between the
state and businesses. As a result, they have precluded the theoretical pos-
sibility of more than one pattern of state–business ties existing in the
Chinese political economy. The typological framework to be developed in
this book, which focuses on both the authoritative governance of the
economy and the market coordination of socioeconomic activities, pro-
vides a more encompassing analytical tool for developing a holistic under-
standing of changing and divergent forms of state–business relations, as
will be shown below. This is particularly relevant, given that the ultimate
objective of the book is to illustrate how the interrelationship between
state agencies, firms and business organizations has varied across different
regions and industries and explain how these regional and sectoral varia-
tions have shaped the pattern and trajectory of economic institutional
changes in China.
Furthermore, the emphasis of many extant studies has tended to be
more on understanding how business–government relations in China have
been changing over time, particularly against the backdrop of the coun-
try’s increased integration with the global economy and continuous mar-
ket reforms, than on examining how and why such relations have changed
6 X. ZHANG AND T. ZHU
The two last hypotheses came the nearest to the truth, and
differed from it only by about eight minutes, the one in excess and
the other in defect. And, after being much perplexed by this
remaining error, it at last occurred to him 41 that he might take
another ellipsis, exactly intermediate between the former one and
the circle, and that this must give the path and the motion of the
planet. Making this assumption, and taking the areas to represent
the times, he now saw 42 that both the longitude and the distances of
Mars would agree with observation to the requisite degree of
accuracy. The rectification of the former hypothesis, when thus
stated, may, perhaps, appear obvious. And Kepler informs us that he
had nearly been anticipated in this step (c. 55). “David Fabricius, to
whom I had communicated my hypothesis of cap. 45, was able, by
his observations, to show that it erred in making the distances too
short at mean longitudes; of which he informed me by letter while I
was laboring, by repeated efforts, to discover the true hypothesis. So
nearly did he get the start of me in detecting the truth.” But this was
less easy than it might seem. When Kepler’s first hypothesis was
enveloped in the complex construction requisite in order to apply it to
each point of the orbit, it was far more difficult to see where the error
lay, and Kepler hit upon it only by noticing the coincidences of certain
numbers, which, as he says, raised him as if from sleep, and gave
him a new light. We may observe, also, that he was perplexed to
reconcile this new view, according to which the planet described an
exact ellipse, with his former opinion, which represented the motion
by means of libration in an epicycle. “This,” he says, “was my
greatest trouble, that, though I considered and reflected till I was
almost mad, I could not find why the planet to which, with so much
probability, and with such an exact 301 accordance of the distances,
libration in the diameter of the epicycle was attributed, should,
according to the indication of the equations, go in an elliptical path.
What an absurdity on my part! as if libration in the diameter might not
be a way to the ellipse!”
41 De Stellâ Martis, c. 58.
42 Ibid. p. 235.
The real verification of the new doctrine concerning the orbits and
motions of the heavenly bodies was, of course, to be found in the
construction of tables of those motions, and in the continued
comparison of such tables with observation. Kepler’s discoveries had
been founded, as we have seen, principally on Tycho’s observations.
Longomontanus (so called as being a native of Langberg in
Denmark), published in 1621, in his Astronomia Danica, tables
founded upon the theories as well as the observations of his
countryman. Kepler 44 in 1627 published his tables of the planets,
which he called Rudolphine Tables, the result and application of his
own theory. In 1633, Lansberg, a Belgian, published also Tabulæ
Perpetuæ, a work which was ushered into the world with
considerable pomp and pretension, and in which the author cavils
very keenly at Kepler and Brahe. We may judge of the impression
made upon the astronomical world in general by these rival works,
from the account which our countryman Jeremy Horrox has given of
their effect on him. He had been seduced by the magnificent
promises of Lansberg, and the praises of his admirers, which are
prefixed to the work, and was persuaded that the common opinion
which preferred Tycho and Kepler to him was a prejudice. In 1636,
however, he became acquainted with Crabtree, another young 303
astronomer, who lived in the same part of Lancashire. By him Horrox
was warned that Lansberg was not to be depended on; that his
hypotheses were vicious, and his observations falsified or forced into
agreement with his theories. He then read the works and adopted
the opinions of Kepler; and after some hesitation which he felt at the
thought of attacking the object of his former idolatry, he wrote a
dissertation on the points of difference between them. It appears
that, at one time, he intended to offer himself as the umpire who was
to adjudge the prize of excellence among the three rival theories of
Longomontanus, Kepler, and Lansberg; and, in allusion to the story
of ancient mythology, his work was to have been called Paris
Astronomicus; we easily see that he would have given the golden
apple to the Keplerian goddess. Succeeding observations confirmed
his judgment: and the Rudolphine Tables, thus published seventy-six
years after the Prutenic, which were founded on the doctrines of
Copernicus, were for a long time those universally used.
44 Rheticus, Narratio, p. 98.
FLUID MECHANICS.
ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΒIΑ ΤΕ, σφῷν μὲν ἐντολὴ Διὸς
Ἔχει Τέλος δὴ, κ’ οὐδὲν ἐμποδῶν ἔτι
Æschylus. Prom. Vinct. 13.
W EfromenterAstronomy
now upon a new region of the human mind. In passing
to Mechanics we make a transition from the
formal to the physical sciences;—from time and space to force and
matter;—from phenomena to causes. Hitherto we have been
concerned only with the paths and orbits, the periods and cycles, the
angles and distances, of the objects to which our sciences applied,
namely, the heavenly bodies. How these motions are produced;—by
what agencies, impulses, powers, they are determined to be what
they are;—of what nature are the objects themselves;—are
speculations which we have hitherto not dwelt upon. The history of
such speculations now comes before us; but, in the first place, we
must consider the history of speculations concerning motion in
general, terrestrial as well as celestial. We must first attend to
Mechanics, and afterwards return to Physical Astronomy.
The effect of the Inclined Plane was one of the first, as it was one
of the most important, propositions, on which modern writers
employed themselves. It was found that a body, when supported on
a sloping surface, might be sustained or raised by a force or exertion
which would not have been able to sustain or raise it without such
support. And hence, The Inclined Plane was placed in the list of
Mechanical Powers, or simple machines by which the efficacy of
forces is increased: the question was, in what proportion this
increase of efficiency takes place. It is easily seen that the force
requisite to sustain a body is smaller, as the slope on which it rests is
smaller; Cardan (whose work, De Proportionibus Numerorum,
Motuum, Ponderum, &c., was published in 1545) asserts that the
force is double when the angle of inclination is double, and so on for
other proportions; this is probably a guess, and is an erroneous one.
Guido Ubaldi, of Marchmont, published at Pesaro, in 1577, a work
which he called Mechanicorum Liber, in which he endeavors to
prove that an acute wedge will produce a greater mechanical effect
than an obtuse one, without determining in what proportion. There is,
he observes, “a certain repugnance” between the direction in which
the side of the wedge tends to 314 move the obstacle, and the
direction in which it really does move. Thus the Wedge and the
Inclined Plane are connected in principle. He also refers the Screw
to the Inclined Plane and the Wedge, in a manner which shows a
just apprehension of the question. Benedetti (1585) treats the
Wedge in a different manner; not exact, but still showing some
powers of thought on mechanical subjects. Michael Varro, whose
Tractatus de Motu was published at Geneva in 1584, deduces the
wedge from the composition of hypothetical motions, in a way which
may appear to some persons an anticipation of the doctrine of the
Composition of Forces.