Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download China and intervention at the UN Security Council : reconciling status First Edition. Edition Fung file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download China and intervention at the UN Security Council : reconciling status First Edition. Edition Fung file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-un-at-war-peace-operations-in-
a-new-era-1st-edition-john-karlsrud-auth/
https://ebookmass.com/product/vicarious-identity-in-
international-relations-self-security-and-status-on-the-global-
stage-1st-edition-christopher-s-browning/
https://ebookmass.com/product/china-and-africa-building-peace-
and-security-cooperation-on-the-continent-1st-edition-chris-
alden/
https://ebookmass.com/product/water-crime-and-security-in-the-
twenty-first-century-1st-ed-edition-avi-brisman/
UN Governance: Peace and Human Security in Cambodia and
Timor-Leste 1st ed. Edition Brendan M. Howe
https://ebookmass.com/product/un-governance-peace-and-human-
security-in-cambodia-and-timor-leste-1st-ed-edition-brendan-m-
howe/
https://ebookmass.com/product/design-and-analysis-of-security-
protocol-for-communication-first-edition-dinesh-goyal/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-security-in-china-a-post-
pandemic-state-1st-edition-chi-zhang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-fire-code-
international-code-council-series-2021-1st-edition-international-
code-council/
https://ebookmass.com/product/love-at-first-bark-debbie-burns-2/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
COURTNEY J. FUNG
1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Courtney J. Fung 2019
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2019
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019937227
ISBN 978–0–19–884274–3
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
For my parents
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
Acknowledgements
Despite presenting a set of neat explanations and insights in the book that follows,
I must recognize that the path to publication was nowhere as logical or clear.
Indeed, I was lucky with much good fortune. At just the right time, I received a
General Research Fund grant (#17612518) from the Research Grants Council of
Hong Kong to focus on finishing this book project. My grateful thanks to the RGC
for the award.
This book grew out of my doctoral thesis, though much of that text does not
remain here. It was my time working on my dissertation at The Fletcher School of
Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, that taught me to put less weight on
academic fads and work on intellectual projects in service to a greater, practical
good. My dissertation advisors—Alan M. Wachman, Daniel W. Drezner, Ian
Johnstone, and Alastair Iain Johnston—all deserve my deepest thanks for their
patience with me and my work. It was all the unanswered questions of my
dissertation—and in particular during my oral defense, where my committee
wanted to discuss the Chinese role in addressing the unfolding Syrian civil
war—which prompted me to change my research question entirely.
I am eternally grateful that Alan took me on as a doctoral advisee, and for
always encouraging me to move on to my next phase of research (“Why wait until
everyone says it’s your turn, Courtney? If you’re ready, you should try”). Alan was
not only generous enough to offer his own peers as initial points of contact during
my first round of fieldwork in Beijing, but then followed up with individual email
messages thanking them all for their time. A decade on from my first trip, and
I still meet those who remember me as Alan’s student, given his proper attention
to detail with those thank you messages. In Alan’s own unassuming sure-
handedness, he left a very high standard for me to aspire to as a productive and
thoughtful scholar. Dan offered succinct feedback during my numerous visits with
him (“You’ve mixed up variables and observable implications. What’s the next
question?”). I hope to impart insights the way he does in a ten-minute meeting;
one day! Dan’s argumentative curiosity, clear thinking and total impatience for
half-baked work are solid reminders for why we engage in social science to begin
with. Ian’s reputation as one of the most generous, kind, and thoughtful scholars is
entirely deserved. Ian’s introduction to the Center on International Cooperation
gave me the launch pad for fieldwork, and he always made time to read my
(many) drafts and meet in person. Those of you who know Ian will be unsur-
prised; and those of you who know what a scholar-practitioner’s schedule looks
like will be rightfully impressed. I’m grateful for Ian’s mentorship to say the least.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
viii
Iain’s work is a continual source of inspiration for me. Alan was right that while
others see the world in black and white, Iain is watching in color. Iain spent hours
discussing my Darfur case with me, and in asking probing questions about my
interview minutiae, he showed me first-hand how to actually do process-tracing.
The months (or let’s be honest here, years) spent reworking and rethinking this
single case, meant that the growing pains for the next case studies were nowhere
near as bad. I thank each of my teachers for letting me observe and learn as
I became my own independent researcher. I will always be a student in their
company, and their unanimous assumption that I would write a book was a
touchstone for me upon my departure from Boston for new responsibilities and
time pressures in Hong Kong.
A number of fellowships and visiting positions gave me respite to work on the
ideas contained here. Some of my initial fieldwork was supported by a Konosuke
Matsushita Memorial Foundation grant (#11-003), which enabled me to start data
collection. I was a research fellow in the International Security Program at the
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, under the
guidance of Steven E. Miller and Stephen M. Walt. The program provided an
intellectual environment to contemplate larger implications of my research, and
an excellent opportunity to present initial ideas to an audience skeptical that
China could be interested in such vague things as ‘status’ and ‘responsibility.’
I was a pre-doctoral research fellow at the Center on International Cooperation,
New York University, and thank Richard Gowan, Jake Sherman, and Ben Tortolani
in particular. They all nudged along my thinking and emphasized the policy
relevance of my research. I had an eye-opening summer serving in the UN
Department of Peacekeeping Operations–Policy and Best Practices Section under
the guidance of David Haeri, Roxaneh Bazergan, and Rebecca Jovin. It was there
that I truly realized that outcomes in the real world are idiosyncratic and fortuitous,
and that even apparently insignificant, private moments have ripple effects for
policy. Both Iain and Thomas J. Christensen supported me for a year-long fellow-
ship at the Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies, Harvard University through the
now Columbia-Harvard China and the World Program funded by the Carnegie
Corporation of New York. I am so grateful for that uninterrupted opportunity to
think, collect data, and write. I thank both Iain and Tom for the mentorship over the
years, and for reminding me of the importance of having work-life balance,
something not really valued in the academe. It was Tom who wisely reminded me
to work six days a week while I could still justify it, and then not to feel guilty when
other priorities prevailed. I am also glad for the CWP friendships and scholarly
network; the jolt of energy from the workshop sessions are always worth the
dreaded jetlag. Colin Wight had me as a visitor in the Department of Politics and
International Relations at the University of Sydney when I was rethinking the
research framework, and Jingdong Yuan was a generous host there too. I also
thank Young Hwan Shin of the East Asia Institute in Seoul for my fellowship in
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
ix
the Program on Peace, Governance, and Development in East Asia funded by the
Japan Foundation, the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly
Exchange of Taiwan, and YBM/KIS, which gave me the valuable opportunity to
think through background ideas for the project.
Many people have supported me, in big ways and small, and without them
I wouldn’t have figured out where I was going. Thanks go to my seniors—Steve
Chan, Rosemary Foot, and Ja Ian Chong—who offered encouragement for the
project and read various drafts along the way. Thank you to Jenifer Burckett-
Picker, Lydia M. Chen, Jessica Daniels, Ann Decembrele, Noah Gall, Laurie
Hurley, Susan Lynch, Ellen McDonald, Carol Murphy, Miriam Seltzer, Sharon
To, Daniel Tsang, and May Yim for all keeping the literal and figurative trains
running on time.
At Oxford University Press, Dominic Byatt was a joy of an editor to work with,
and I am so grateful that he saw promise in this project and kept up the hunt for
reviewers. Matthew Williams and Céline Louasli ably pulled together all the
different files and kept production humming. Rob Wilkinson admirably cleaned
my text. I am indebted to all four reviewers for their comments and queries that
undoubtedly improved this book. Some initial drafts of my research were pub-
lished as journal articles. My 2018 article, “Separating Intervention From Regime
Change? China’s Diplomatic Innovations at the UN Security Council Regarding
the Syria Crisis,” The China Quarterly, 235, 693–712 is reprinted with permission
from Cambridge University Press. My 2016 article, “Global South solidarity?
China, regional organisations and intervention in the Libyan and Syrian
civil wars,” Third World Quarterly 37: 1, 33–50, is reprinted by permission of
the publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd. Copyright © Southseries Inc., www.
thirdworldquarterly.com, reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Ltd,
www.tandfonline.com on behalf of Southseries Inc., www.thirdworldquarterly.
com. v1.9. My 2016 article, “Explaining China’s Deployment to UN Peacekeeping
Operations,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 16: 3, 409–41 is reprinted
by permission of Oxford University Press and the Japan Association of Inter-
national Relations. This project also benefited from a number of scholars who
gave their time to challenge my work. Thank you to the participants at seminars at
the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, the National University of Singapore,
the Saltzman Institute for War and Peace Studies at the School of International
and Public Affairs at Columbia University, the China and the World Center at the
Australia National University, the Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to
Protect at the University of Queensland, and the Security Studies Group at the
University of Sydney, Keio University, Peking University, Seoul National Univer-
sity, The University of Nottingham-Ningbo, and at NYU-Shanghai.
I am lucky to have a supportive research environment at the Department of
Politics and Public Administration at the University of Hong Kong. Thank you to
colleagues past and present, in particular John Burns, Joseph C. W. Chan, Peter
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
x
Cheung, Yvonne Chiu, James Gledhill, Enze Han, Will Hayward, Ian Holliday,
Inwook Kim, Danny Lam, Helen Liu, Kai Quek, Uwe Steinhoff, and Injoo Sohn
for discussing different phases of the project with me. Thank you to Thomas
S. Wilkins, who was visiting faculty in the Department, for so graciously facilitat-
ing my time at the University of Sydney. Thank you to Eliza W. Y. Lee for
supporting my mini-sabbatical and to Richard W. Hu for making my application
to the RGC possible. Thanks in particular to both Joseph and Ian for their sense of
perspective on academic life and mentorship over the years. Both believed in the
value of this monograph and gave steady guidance on managing my competing
professional demands as I embarked on this multi-year project. I am indebted to
Debby S. W. Chan, Christelle Chartrand, Yudi Feng, and Shing-Hon Lam for the
yeoman’s work of research assistance. This category of tasks included ferreting
down dead-ends, chasing winding paper trails, and forever explaining software to
this tech dinosaur. In particular, Debby and Shing-Hon dealt with the brunt of my
off-the-cuff and short-notice requests, of which there were many. I am honored to
have learned from such bright, young scholars and foreign-policy practitioners.
Many colleagues, friends, and family cheered me on along the way. Thank you to
Nichole Argo Ben Itzhak, Yan Bennett, Susanna P. Campbell, Jonathan T. Chow,
Enda Curran, Leif-Eric Easley, Joe Gagliano, Nancy W. Gleason, Elke Jahns-Harms,
Tiffany Kam, Jung Eun Kim, Jeehye Kim, Alanna Krolikowski, Jada Lam, Marc
Lanteigne, Tabitha Mallory, Ben Mazzotta, Elizabeth McClintock, Bex Metcalf,
Dipali Mukhopadhyay, Jenny Powlesland, Xiaoyu Pu, Ivan W. Rasmussen, Mihaela
Papa, Tracy Richardson, Daniel Suchenski, Sarah Teitt, Marina Travayiakis Melido-
nis, and Sean Wong for all of their support. I thank Wilfred Wan in particular for
reading drafts, putting up with all of my WhatsApp messages, and for always
making the time to call and commiserate. Thank you also to Jennifer L. Erickson
for offering frank insights on the book publishing odyssey and for all of her
encouragement via email, ISA catch-ups, and skype calls. Thanks to Kei Koga for
all of his sage advice over the years (“just write it, Courtney!”) and for always setting
a pace for me to follow.
The research that follows is impossible to do without the time and observations
from the decision-makers addressing these foreign-policy crises. I am indebted to
all of my interviewees for their insights, contacts, and reflections as to how foreign
policy actually happens. Numerous cigarette breaks, coffee and tea appointments
helped me understand just how complex, tenuous, and at times fortuitous, the
work of day-to-day international relations actually is. I left many Beijing and New
York research trips thinking it was frankly a marvel that any international response
is offered at all for crises in these perennially ‘far away places.’ Thank you to each of
my interviewees for their generosity and patience with my questions, and repeated
contact throughout the years. Many interviewees not only recommended others to
call on next, but actually vouched for me to facilitate my appointments.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
xi
Thank you to my two little loves for being the embodiment of joy and the best
form of distraction—two things that all writers need in great quantities. My real
commitment to work on this book began when my first was still teething, and
I was pregnant with our second. Never did I think I would write singing nursery
rhymes, bouncing a baby desperate to ‘help’ by jabbing at the keyboard—and
never did I think that I would find it hilarious to do so. My children, and their
curiosity, exuberance, and persistence (“I do it myself, Mama!”) have given me a
true sense of purpose about my day. My husband deserves much gratitude.
Writing is an inherently selfish task: staring into space, attempting to clear your
head, and dismissing wandering thoughts in order to type a few sentences. All of
this looks much like time-wasting to the untrained eye. My husband never once
asked if I could write faster. And he gave me the one thing I couldn’t find
anywhere else when the real crunch came: time. Time for me to think, write,
and sleep—a true luxury when you face a killer combination of writer’s block, half-
finished drafts, and a growing brood. My husband’s own curiosity and zest for life
keeps me buoyant when buffeted. I am so grateful that our stars aligned.
My deepest thanks go to my first teachers, my parents. My parents have always
encouraged me to believe in myself and to be unafraid of ‘stretch.’ They had faith
that I knew what I was doing—even as a 16-year-old choosing to move to London
to read the fuzzy stuff of International Relations. In particular, I will always be
grateful for my parents taking care of everything during my junior sabbatical, my
one precious opportunity to focus on the book’s foundation. Mom in particular
selflessly took care of me and my growing family—and kept me in good company
walking to the station and going for tea. Daddy was the first to read the whole
manuscript. Both my parents remain my most steady guides, listening to me
debate about how to proceed in work and life. I dedicate this book to my parents
with love.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
Table of Contents
List of Graphs xv
List of Tables xvii
List of Abbreviations xix
Introduction 1
I. BACKGROUND
II. THEORY
3. Theory and Empirical Strategy 39
III. CASES
4. Status and Intervention in Darfur, Sudan 2004–2008 63
5. Status and Intervention in Libya, 2011–2012 88
6. Status and Intervention in Syria, 2011–2015 108
IV. CONCLUSION
7. Conclusion 135
Endnotes 151
Bibliography 225
Index 275
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
List of Graphs
2.1. Chinese National Knowledge Index keyword search for “regime change”
in the core newspaper database for 2000–2015, without duplicates 30
2.2. Chinese National Knowledge Index keyword search for “regime change”
in abstracts of the academic journals database for 2000–2015,
without duplicates 30
4.1. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “Darfur”
and “regime change” within five words, 2004–2008, without duplicates 67
4.2. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “China”
and “Darfur” as headline/lead terms, 2004–2008, without duplicates 83
5.1. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “Libya”
and “regime change” within five words, 2000–2014, without duplicates 93
5.2. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “Libya”
and “regime change” within five words by month, 2011, without duplicates 93
6.1. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “Syria”
and “regime change” within five words, 2000–2014, without duplicates 112
6.2. Factiva database search of English-language sources regarding “Syria”
and “regime change” within five words by month, 2011–2014, without
duplicates 112
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/7/2019, SPi
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations
I say, Lord Sigismund who had given the expedition its decent air of
being just an aristocratic whim, stamped it, marked it, raised it altogether
above mere appearances. He was a Christian gentleman; more, he was the
only one of the party who could cook. Were we, then, to be thrown for future
sustenance entirely on Jellaby’s porridge?
That afternoon, dining in the mud of the deserted farmyard, we had
sausages; a dinner that had only been served once before, and which was a
sign in itself that the kitchen resources were strained. I have already
described how Jellaby cooked sausages, goading them round and round the
pan, prodding them, pursuing them, giving them no rest in which to turn
brown quietly—as foolish a way with a sausage as ever I have seen. For the
second time during the tour we ate them pink, filling up as best we might
with potatoes, a practice we had got quite used to, though to you, my
hearers, who only know potatoes as an adjunct, it will seem a pitiable state
of things. So it was; but when one is hungry to the point of starvation a hot
potato is an attractive object, and two hot potatoes are exactly doubly so.
Anyhow my respect for them has increased tenfold since my holiday, and I
insist now on their being eaten in much larger quantities than they used to be
in our kitchen, for do I not know how thoroughly they fill? And servants
quarrel if they have too much meat.
“That is poor food for a man like you, Baron,” said Menzies-Legh,
suddenly addressing me from the other end of the table.
He had been watching me industriously scraping—picture, my friends,
Baron von Ottringel thus reduced—scraping, I say, the last remnants of the
potatoes out of the saucepan after the ladies had gone, accompanied by
Jellaby, to begin washing up.
It was so long since he had spoken to me of his own accord that I paused
in my scraping to stare at him. Then, with my natural readiness at that sort of
thing, I drew his attention to his bad manners earlier in the afternoon by
baldly answering “Eh?”
“I wonder you stand it,” he said, taking no notice of the little lesson.
“Pray will you tell me how it is to be helped?” I inquired. “Roast goose
does not, I have observed, grow on the hedges in your country.” (This, I felt,
was an excellent retort.)
“But it flourishes in London and other big towns,” said he—a foolish
thing to say to a man sitting in the back yard of Frogs’ Hole Farm. “Have a
cigarette,” he added; and he pushed his case toward me.
I lit one, slightly surprised at the change for the better in his behaviour,
and he got up and came and sat on the vacant camp-stool beside me.
“Hunger,” said I, continuing the conversation, “is the best sauce, and as I
am constantly hungry it follows that I cannot complain of not having enough
sauce. In fact, I am beginning to feel that gipsying is a very health-giving
pursuit.”
“Damp—damp,” said Menzies-Legh, shaking his head and screwing up
his mouth in a disapproval that astonished me.
“What?” I said. “It may be a little damp if the weather is damp, but one
must get used to hardships.”
“Only to find,” said he, “that one’s constitution has been undermined.”
“What?” said I, unable to understand this change of attitude.
“Undermined for life,” said he, impressively.
“My dear sir, I have heard you myself, under the most adverse
circumstances, repeatedly remark that it was healthy and jolly.”
“My dear Baron,” said he, “I am not like you. Neither Jellaby, nor I, nor
Browne either, for that matter, has your physique. We are physically,
compared to you—to be quite frank—mere weeds.”
“Oh, come now, my dear sir, I cannot permit you—you undervalue—of
slighter build, perhaps, but hardly——”
“It is true. Weeds. Mere weeds. And my point is that we, accordingly, are
not nearly so likely as you are to suffer in the long run from the privations
and exposure of a bad-weather holiday like this.”
“Well now, you must pardon me if I entirely fail to see——”
“Why, my dear Baron, it’s as plain as daylight. Our constitutions will not
be undermined for the shatteringly good reason that we have none to
undermine.”
My hearers will agree that, logically, the position was incontrovertible,
and yet I doubted.
Observing my silence, and probably guessing its cause, he took up an
empty glass and poured some tea into it from the teapot at which Frau von
Eckthum had been slaking her thirst in spite of my warnings (I had, alas, no
right to forbid) that so much tea drinking would make her still more liable to
start when suddenly addressed.
“Look here,” said he.
I looked.
“You can see this tea.”
“Certainly.”
“Clear, isn’t it? A beautiful clear brown. A tribute to the spring water
here. You can see the house and all its windows through it, it is so perfectly
transparent.”
And he held it up, and shutting one eye stared through it with the other.
“Well?” I inquired.
“Well, now look at this.”
And he took another glass and set it beside the first one, and poured both
tea and milk into it.
“Look there,” he said.
I looked.
“Jellaby,” said he.
I stared.
Then he took another glass, and poured both tea and milk into it, setting it
in a line with the first two.
“Browne,” said he.
I stared.
Then he took a fourth glass, and filled it in the same manner as the
second and third and placed it at the end of the line.
“Myself,” said he.
I stared.
“Can you see through either of those three?” he asked, tapping them one
after the other.
“No,” said I.
“Now if I put a little more milk into them”—he did—“it makes no
difference. They were muddy and thick before, and they remain muddy and
thick. But”—and he held the milk jug impressively over the first glass—“if I
put the least drop into this one”—he did—“see how visible it is. The
admirable clearness is instantaneously dimmed. The pollution spreads at
once. The entire glass, owing to that single drop, is altered, muddied,
ruined.”
“Well?” I inquired, as he paused and stared hard at me.
“Well?” said he. “Do you not see?”
“See what?” said I.
“My point. It’s as clear as the first glass was before I put milk into it. The
first glass, my dear Baron, is you, with your sound and perfect constitution.”
I bowed.
“Your splendid health.”
I bowed.
“Your magnificent physique.”
I bowed.
“The other three are myself, and Jellaby, and Browne.”
He paused.
“And the drop of milk,” he said slowly, “is the caravan tour.”
I was confounded; and you, my hearers, will admit that I had every
reason to be. Here was an example of what is rightly called irresistible logic,
and a reasonable man dare not refuse, once he recognizes it, to bow in
silence. Yet I felt very well. I said I did, after a pause during which I was
realizing how unassailable Menzies-Legh’s position was, and endeavouring
to reconcile its unassailableness with my own healthful sensations.
“You can’t get away from facts,” he answered. “There they are.”
And he indicated with his cigarette the four glasses and the milk jug.
“But,” I repeated, “except for a natural foot-soreness I undoubtedly do
feel very well.”
“My dear Baron, it is obvious beyond all argument that the more
absolutely well a person is the more easily he must be affected by the
smallest upset, by the smallest variation in the environment to which he has
got accustomed. Paradox, which plays so large a part in all truths, is rampant
here. Those in perfect health are nearer than anybody else to being seriously
ill. To keep well you must never be quite so.”
He paused.
“When,” he continued, seeing that I said nothing, “we began caravaning
we could not know how persistently cold and wet it was going to be, but
now that we do I must say I feel the responsibility of having persuaded you
—or of my sister-in-law’s having persuaded you—to join us.”
“But I feel very well,” I repeated.
“And so you will, up to the moment when you do not.”
Of course that was true.
“Rheumatism, now,” he said, shaking his head; “I greatly fear
rheumatism for you in the coming winter. And rheumatism once it gets hold
of a man doesn’t leave him till it has ravaged each separate organ, including,
as everybody knows, that principal organ of all, the heart.”
This was gloomy talk, and yet the man was right. The idea that a holiday,
a thing planned and looked forward to with so much pleasure, was to end by
ravaging my organs did not lighten the leaden atmosphere that surrounded
and weighed upon Frogs’ Hole Farm.
“I cannot alter the weather,” I said at last—irritably, for I felt ruffled.
“No. But I wouldn’t risk it for too long if I were you,” said he.
“Why, I have paid for a month,” I exclaimed, surprised that he should
overlook this clinching fact.
“That, set against an impaired constitution, is a very inconsiderable
trifle,” said he.
“Not inconsiderable at all,” said I sharply.
“Money is money, and I am not one to throw it away. And what about the
van? You cannot abandon an entire van at a great distance from the place it
belongs to.”
“Oh,” said he quickly, “we would see to that.”
I got up, for the sight of the glasses full of what I was forced to
acknowledge was symbolic truth irritated me. The one representing myself,
into which he had put but one drop of milk, was miserably discoloured. I did
not like to think of such discolouration being my probable portion, and yet
having paid for a month’s caravaning what could I do?
The afternoon was chilly and very damp, and I buttoned my wraps
carefully about my throat. Menzies-Legh watched me.
“Well,” said he, getting up and looking first at me and then at the glasses
and then at me again, “what do you think of doing, Baron?”
“Going for a little stroll,” I said.
And I went.
CHAPTER XVII
M Y hearers will I hope appreciate the frankness with which I show them
all my sides, good and bad. I do so with my eyes open, aware that some
of you may very possibly think less well of me for having been, for
instance, such a prey to supernatural dread. Allow me, however, to point out
that if you do you are wrong. You suffer from a confusion of thought. And I
will show you why. My wife, you will have noticed, had on the occasion
described few or no fears. Did this prove courage? Certainly not. It merely
proved the thicker spiritual skin of woman. Quite without that finer
sensibility that has made men able to produce works of genius while women
have been able only to produce (a merely mechanical process) young, she
felt nothing apparently but a bovine surprise. Clearly, if you have no
imagination neither can you have any fears. A dead man is not frightened.
An almost dead man does not care much either. The less dead a man is the
more do possible combinations suggest themselves to him. It is imagination
and sensibility, or the want of them, that removes you further or brings you
nearer to the animals. Consequently (I trust I am being followed?) when
imagination and sensibility are busiest, as they were during those moments I
lay waiting and listening in my berth, you reach the highest point of
aloofness from the superiority to the brute creation; your vitality is at its
greatest; you are, in a word, if I may be permitted to coin an epigram, least
dead. Therefore, my friends, it is plain that at that very moment when you
(possibly) may have thought I was showing my weakest side I was doing the
exact opposite, and you will not, having intelligently followed the argument,
say at the end of it as my poor little wife did, “But how?”
I do not wish, however, to leave you longer under the impression that the
deserted farmhouse was haunted. It may have been of course, but it was not
on that night of last August. What was happening was that a party from the
parsonage—a holiday party of young and rather inclined to be noisy people,
which had overflowed the bounds of the accommodation there—was
utilizing the long, empty front room as an impromptu (I believe that is the
expression) ball-room. The farm belonged to the pastor—observe the fatness
of these British ecclesiastics—and it was the practice of his family during
the holidays to come down sometimes in the evening and dance in it. All this
I found out after Edelgard had dressed and gone across to see for herself
what the lights and stamping meant. She insisted on doing so in spite of my
warnings, and came back after a long interval to tell me the above, her face
flushed and her eyes bright, for she had seized the opportunity, regardless of
what I might be feeling waiting alone, to dance too.
“You danced too?” I exclaimed.
“Do come, Otto. It is such fun,” said she.
“With whom did you dance, may I inquire?” I asked, for the thought of
the Baroness von Ottringel dancing with the first comer in a foreign farm
was of course most disagreeable to me.
“Mr. Jellaby,” said she. “Do come.”
“Jellaby? What is he doing there?”
“Dancing. And so is everybody. They are all there. That’s why their
caravans were so quiet. Do come.”
And she ran out again, a childishly eager expression on her face, into the
night.
“Edelgard!” I called.
But though she must have heard me she did not come back.
Relieved, puzzled, vexed, and curious together, I did get up and dress,
and on lighting a candle and looking at my watch I was astonished to find
that it was only a quarter to ten. For a moment I could not credit my eyes,
and I shook the watch and held it to my ears, but it was going, as steadily as
usual, and all I could do was to reflect as I dressed on what may happen to
you if you go to bed and to sleep at seven o’clock.
And how soundly I must have done it. But of course I was unusually
weary, and not feeling at all well. Two hours’ excellent sleep, however, had
done wonders for me so great are my recuperative powers, and I must say I
could not help smiling as I crossed the yard and went up to the house at the
remembrance of Menzies-Legh’s glass of tea. He would not see much milk
about me now, thought I, as I strode, giving my moustache ends a final
upward push and guided by the music, into the room in which they were
dancing.
The dance came to an end as I entered, and a sudden hush seemed to fall
upon the company. It was composed of boys and young girls attired in
evening garments next to which the clothes of the caravaners, weather-
beaten children of the road, looked odd and grimy indeed. The tender lady, it