Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1990_Avdeevetal_PSE26n10_Spatial_filtering_local_MT-distortions
1990_Avdeevetal_PSE26n10_Spatial_filtering_local_MT-distortions
1990_Avdeevetal_PSE26n10_Spatial_filtering_local_MT-distortions
net/publication/269409305
CITATIONS READS
2 23
4 authors, including:
E. B. Fainberg
Russian Academy of Sciences
174 PUBLICATIONS 918 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by B. Sh. Singer on 12 December 2014.
0OOl-4354/91/2610-000~$18.00/1 813
814 D. B. AVDEYEV ET AL.
There also are schemes oriented on direct de- is related to the nature of the singularity of the
termination of the mean fields on the basis of da- admittance filter when ~ + O. In actuality,
ta from profile measurements of the electrical
field [5]. Below we will discuss the problem of
the extent of the spatial region within which aver-
aging must be carried out and also to what degree
the averaging operation makes it possible'to even- -2:ti<tl!loG'(r) ~ - ~ e
out the influence of surface inhomogeneities. For r_o r
this purpose we will examine a model of an Earth
consisting of an inhomogeneous surface S-layer un- where xo={ -iw!1oa{+O) }"', a( +0) is the conductivity of
derlain by a horizontally homogeneous section. the section at its top. Accordingly. f(r)-1/r
The model is excited by an arbitrary external when P + O. In a case when the electrical field is
field. It is known that the electrical field tan- constant along the Earth's surface or when the dif-
gential component E (r) remains continuous with ference E,(i)- E,(r) is an odd function of p' - p
'[
the integral term in (3) becomes equal to zero.
passage through the S-layer. whereas the magnetic
field tangential component experiences a jump de- since f(-r)=Y(r). and (3) is reduced to
termined by current density:
nXH,-(r) =E,(r)/Z.-,
nXH.(r) -nXH.-(r) =8 (r)E.(r) (2)
In actual practice, however, neither assumption is
where H is the magnetic field tangential compo-
satisfied.
T
nent at the top of the underlying S-layer of a Using (2), (3), it is easy to derive an ex-
horizontally homogeneous section. According to pression relating the electromagnetic field tangen-
[6], the magnetotelluric field tangential compo- tial components at the Earth's surface:
nents are related at the surface of the horizon-
tally homogeneous section as follows
nXH,(r)=E,(r)/Z.(r)+ fy(r-r') {E,(r')-E,(r)}dr', (9)
.
where
1 - Z.-
-~+S(r)
Z.(r)
(erl8ler)
{-+-
G'(r) dG'
}
tegral
term.
term in comparison with the nonintegral
The latter, obviously, is dependent on the
r dr' nature of behavior of both the electrical field and
the admittance filter. According to [6], the in-
which below will be called the admittance kernel. duction part of the admittance filter (that is, the
Here er = rlr, a@b is used to denote the tensor i
part related to the kernel G ) attenuates exponen-
product of the vectors a=ate,+a.e., b=b,e,+b.e., ct! e. tially at distances on the order of the effective
are horizontal unit vectors of a Cartesian coordi- depth of field penetration into the underlying
nate system: (a@b)m,=amb,. The functions section A 01.
I The latter value is directly re-
~
d ( 1 ) dk lated to the impedance of the underlying section:
Go (r)
" = -
.
dk Z' .
1.(kr)2nr (5)
~
Z.-=-iCJJ!1.}... (11)
S d dk However, for an underlying section in its up-
G'(r)= _I (6)
. dk per part having a high-impedance layer, the expo-
nential attenuation of the galvanic (related to
are determined using a Fourier-Bessel transform
dd) part of the admittance filter is characterized
through the spectral impedances Zki, zkg of the by the parameter
section for the induction and galvanic modes re-
spectively. In relation (3) integration is car-
ried out along the outer surface of a horizontally A'=-V~
homogeneous section; the integral is understood
It is easy to confirm that the IA I parameter in
in the sense of the main Cauchy value. The fact g
that expression of the contraction through an in- typical geoelectric situations substantially ex-
tegral in (3) has a form more complex than usual ceeds I A 01.
Using the enumerated results, it is possibl~ Denoting by <f> the result of averaging the com-
l'
to limit the integration in (3), (9) to the region ponent f<1"> within the limits of a circle Ir-r'I~11
Ir-r'I~A , where with its center at the point l' and taking into ac-
count that the averaging result represents a con-
A~ max {I".I. I",!} (13) traction of the filtered function with a spatial
filter, and also the commutativity of the contrac-
In this case relation (3) remains correct regard- tion, it is easy to confirm that the relation
less of how the horizontally homogeneous model is
excited. In the range of periods used for sound-
ing the primary field can be regarded as purely nX<H,->,=<E,>,/Z.-+fV(r-r') {<E,>,.-<E,>,}dr' (18
inductive. The presence of an inhomogeneous sur- .
face layer nevertheless leads to the appearance of follows from (3). If the extent of the region of
a galvanic mode of the field in a conducting Earth spatial averaing is
It was demonstrated in [7] that the anomalous gal-
vanic fields excited by surface layer inhomogenei- W>max{IA.I.li.LI} (JQ)
ties become negligibly small in comparison with
anomalous induction fields with withdrawal from condition (17) is obviously satisfied for the fil-
the inhomogeneity a distance on the order of I~LI. tered field <E >P and (18) is reduced to
where
nX<H,->,=<t~,>,IZo-. (;10)
"T
(14) Thus, averaging for a region with the extent W,
},L=V~
satisfying condition (10), guarantees the possi-
It therefore follows that the integration region bility of satisfying sounding of the underlying
in (3), (9) can be limited to Ir-il~A, where horizontally homogeneous section by the Tikhonov-
Cagniard method using averaged fields. Generally
A~ max(IA.I. IALI}, (15) speaking, condition (19) is not necessary. For
example, when the electromagnetic field changes
A precise idea concerning field behavior along the quasiperiodically in space, for the correctness of
surface of an inhomogeneous Earth can be obtained (20) it is adequate to ensure satisfaction of the
in part only as a result of nontrivial numerical condition W » L , where L is the spatial period.
computations. In order to give a qualitative in- p p
Averaging both sides of expression (2) for
homogeneous Earth, below we will use Lt, the "spa- the jump of the magnetic field tangential compo-
tial scale of field change," defined by the rela- nent in the S-layer, after addition with (20) we
tion find that the averaged electromagnetic field tan-
gential components at the Earth's surface satisfy
max I - a'E,
(16) the relation
~.'-I.' az~ az,
0
F;J W/jj ~~o.°,~~q250mho
V///d ~
.17. 48
mho/m
40,//
~~/
"/ /~/
~/////
% =00
(5"3
//~
/.
0,2
o;~
~6
0;8
~o
1.2
I<E~>/<~>I/IZ.I
. 0 500 W;km
actuality, if within the limits of the entire jump of the magnetic field tangential component in
averaging region the S-layer is small, and accordingly the correct-
ness of the similar relation for <H,), and <E,),
S(r)<t/IZ.-I. at the Earth's surface follows from (20). In this
case <1/Z.),~1/Z.-.
then S(r) <1/IZ.'1 will be all the more true for the Thus, averaging of the electromagnetic field
induction mode. If for a significant part of the tangential components for a spatial region of the
spatial spectrum (k~Lf-') a, similar relation also extent W, satisfying condition (19), makes it pos-
is correct for the galvanic mode S (r) <i/IZ.',. the sible to "normalize" the electromagnetic field at
- !jIj!C,"," -~-"C,,~.cc_~
a result of averaging (dashed curve). is proposed in [9] in place of (22). Simple trans-
formations make it possible to show that in this
case the averaged fields satisfy a relation coin-
ciding with (21), but with a displacement value
equal to
the surface of the underlying section. A similar
procedure, applied to surface fields, leads to
Q' SE,)," S>.-'(E,>, (23)
partial field "normalization." The relative mag-
nitude of the displacement arising in this case This displacement becomes equal to zero in a case
decreases with advance into the long-period part when the surface current does not change within
of the frequency-time spectrum. the averaging region, that is, if it is possible
Before proceeding to a numerical example we to neglect the effects of current leakage from the
will make one comment. As already emphasized, by ~urface layer and also the effects of flow around
the term "averaging" as used above is meant any
surface inhomogeneities.
low-frequency spatial filtering procedure. In
particular, averaging in the literal sense of the
word can be used: Conclusions
(f>,= j f(r')ds'
I'-"'<W
/ \ ds'
J
I,-"I<W
--.
fective
1. Low-frequency spatial
means for suppressing
filtering
distortions
in an ef-
of the
magnetotelluric field caused by local geoelectric
As an illustration of electromagnetic field nor-
malization as a result of averaging we cite the inhomogeneities.
2. The extent of the region of spatial aver-
results of computations for the two-dimensional aging Wensuring field normalization is defined by
model represented in Fig. 1a. In the model the the condition W> ffiliX {IAol. IALI}. where AL {T/(S-1+ =
inhomogeneous upper layer consists of alternating
bands with widths of 48 and 32 km with the conduc- Zo-)}.T is the Tikhonov-Cagniard impedance of the
tivities 250 and 1500 mho. A high-impedance in- underlying section, S is integral conductivity of
termediate layer with a specific conductivity the surface layer.
3. The displacement of "normalized" MT
10-3 mho/m and a thickness 40 km rests on an curves is minimal in the range of descending
"ideal" conductor. Computations were made for a asymptotes and is maximal in the range of ascend-
H-polarized field using the Varentsov-Golubev
program [8] in periods T = 40,80, 320, 1000, ing asymptotes.
3600 s. Figure 1b shows the pattern of distribu-
tion of the normalized electrical field along the
Earth's surface, typical for all the mentioned
periods, demonstrating manifestation of the S-
effect: the electrical field changes inversely
proportionally to the local S value. Figure 2
shows an evaluation of the impedance of the un-
derlying section, normalized to \zo-I, computed
using the averaged electrical and magnetic fields
as a function of W. The dependence of the rela-
tive degree of the displacement Q on W is illus-
trated in Fig. 3. It can be seen that with an
increase in the periods the displacement is re-
duced from 36% in a period T = 40 s to 3.5% in a Received August 18, 1988
818 D. B. AVDEYEV ET AL.
REFERENCES
1. Dmitriyev, V. I., M. N. Berdichevskiy, and G. 6. Avdeyev, D. B., B. Sh. Zinger, and E. V. Fayn-
A. Kokotushkin. Altbom paletok dlya magnito- berg. Prostranstvennoye povedeniye magnetito-
telluricheskogo zondirovaniya v neodnorodnykh telluricheskogo admitansnogo fil'tra (Spatial
sredakh. Ch. 4 (Album of Overlays for Mag- Behavior of Magnetotelluric Admittance Filter).
netotelluric Sounding in Inhomogeneous Media. Preprint No. 19(633). Moscow, IZMIRAN, 1986.
Part 4). Moscow, Izd-vo MGU, 1975. 7. Zinger, B. Sh. and E. V. Faynberg. Different
2 Zinger, B. Sh., and E. V. Faynberg. Elektro- response of MTS and space derivatives methods
magnitnaya induktsiya v neodnorodnykh tonkikh to influence of near-surface inhomogeneities.
sloyakh (Electromagnetic Induction in Inhomo- Izv. AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, pp. 107-112, 1985.
geneous Thin Layers). Moscow, IZMIRAN, 1985. 8 Varentsov, I. M. and N. G. Golubev. Direct
3 Berdichevskiy, M. N., L. L. Vanyan, V. A. and iteration methods for solving systems of
Kuznetsov, et al. Geoelectrical model of the linear equations in two-dimensional problems
Baikal region. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., of simulation of electromagnetic fields, In:
Vol. 22, pp. 1-11, 1980. Matematicheskiye metody v geoelektrike (Mathe-
4 Keller, G. V. Magnetotelluric survey of the matical Methods in Geoelectrics). Moscow,
Basin and Range Province in Western United IZMIRAN, pp. 27-46, 1980.
States, In: Eighth Workshop on Electromagne- 9. Dmitriev, V. I. and M. N. Berdichevskiy. The
tic Induction in the Earth and Moon. Neucha- static model of th~ S-effect, In: Workshop
tel, 1986. on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth and
5. Bostik, F. X. J. Electromagnetic Array Pro- Moon. Abstracts. Dagomys. Moscow, IZMIRAN, p.
filing; presented at the 56th Annual SEG 35, 1988.
Meeting. Houston, pp. 60-61, 1986.