Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional and Global Security 1st ed. Edition Paweł Frankowski full chapter instant download
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional and Global Security 1st ed. Edition Paweł Frankowski full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/covid-19-epidemiology-evolution-
and-cross-disciplinary-perspectives-jiumeng-sun/
https://ebookmass.com/product/huawei-goes-global-volume-ii-
regional-geopolitical-perspectives-and-crisis-management-1st-ed-
edition-wenxian-zhang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/interdisciplinary-and-global-
perspectives-on-intersex-1st-ed-2022-edition-megan-walker/
https://ebookmass.com/product/cross-disciplinary-cross-
institutional-collaboration-in-teacher-education-cases-of-
learning-and-leading-cheryl-j-craig/
Global Perspectives on Stem Cell Technologies 1st
Edition Aditya Bharadwaj (Eds.)
https://ebookmass.com/product/global-perspectives-on-stem-cell-
technologies-1st-edition-aditya-bharadwaj-eds/
https://ebookmass.com/product/words-music-and-the-popular-global-
perspectives-on-intermedial-relations-1st-edition-thomas-gurke/
https://ebookmass.com/product/regional-water-security-robert-c-
brears/
https://ebookmass.com/product/comparative-homeland-security-
global-lessons-wiley-series-on-homeland-defense-and-security-
ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/bioeconomy-and-global-inequalities-
socio-ecological-perspectives-on-biomass-sourcing-and-
production-1st-edition-edition-maria-backhouse/
Cross-Disciplinary
Perspectives on
Regional and
Global Security
Edited by
Paweł Frankowski
and Artur Gruszczak
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional
and Global Security
Paweł Frankowski · Artur Gruszczak
Editors
Cross-Disciplinary
Perspectives on
Regional and Global
Security
Editors
Paweł Frankowski Artur Gruszczak
Jagiellonian University Jagiellonian University
Kraków, Poland Kraków, Poland
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2018
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and
information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied,
with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.
v
vi Contents
Index 247
List of Tables
vii
Introduction
ix
x Introduction
state competences. Moreover, the editors believe that the idea of the
market, as important for any kind of security works as a strategic idea of
building a repertoire of innovative political strategies used by any actor
who adopts market ideas to compensate for a lack of power and polit-
ical resources. The idea of the market or market ideas are designed to
transform existing security institutions, but also have a normative ele-
ment, assuming competition and efficiency for the benefit of citizens of
particular region. Market ideas embrace also the promise of develop-
ment, welfare and economic prosperity; the members of editorial team
argue that security issues are subordinated to market ideas, even logic of
political actions stem from the idea of deeper integration. The second
part of every chapter is devoted to interests pursued by regional actors,
including security issues in particular policies. The concept of interest
is based on the assumption that the state is a system whose purpose is
control and efficiency, which is acceptable from normative and empirical
point of view. Interests, important for understanding regional security are
analyzed from the perspective of active players redefining the borders of
security and political spaces. Apart from states, three types of actor are
particularly important: supranational institutions, subnational actors and
private actors interacting in regional and global scale. All three actors act
in a stream of changes in global security, and with their actions empha-
size a pursuit for global common goods. For the purpose of this book,
all three actors will be analyzed in detail, and regional interests in pro-
moting the security issues are of primary importance. Nevertheless, when
the regional systems are considered as strategic constellations, there are
a good number of interests and ideas behind the proposed policies on
security issues.
Since aforementioned actors operate in a real world their ideal goals
cannot be fully realizable, and are constrained by regional powers, but
also by preferences declared by actors themselves. It is remarkable that
from 1945 onwards traditionally accepted instruments of security, as
preventive war, lost their place in a dictionary of international relations.
Absence of such conflicts provides the basis for new preferences, where
perceptions of regional security have been embedded into domestic
orders and preferences of particular governments. Therefore, interests
will be analyzed in terms of the preferences of participants, which are
dealt with in three different dimensions. Subjective dimension of pref-
erences allows to indicate who are the actors declaring and implementing
their preferences regarding security. In this group following actors will
xii Introduction
Paweł Frankowski
Artur Gruszczak
References
Campbell, John L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Cox, Robert W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond
International Relations Theory. Millennium—Journal of International Studies
10 (2): 126–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501.
Daviter, Falk. 2011. Policy Framing in the European Union. Palgrave Studies in
European Union Politics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins
and Change. Governance 13 (4): 475–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-
1895.00142.
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rhinard, Mark. 2010. Framing Europe: The Policy Shaping Strategies of the
European Commission. Dordrecht and Boston: Republic of Letters and
Martinus Nijhoff.
Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
EUROscepticism and Monetary
Security in Europe
Rafał Riedel
Introduction
The objective of the paper is to investigate the correlations between
the phenomenon of EUROscepticism (understood as a negative atti-
tude towards the monetary integration on a supranational level1)
and the monetary security in Europe. By doing so this study sees
EUROscepticism both as dependant and independant variable, which
positions itself very well in the most recent trend of the European stud-
ies. The so called third generation of Euroscepticism studies postulates
to treat it not only as an explanatory variable but also as an explaining
factor—not just a phenomenon which needs to be explained, but also
towards the European integration as a whole or some of its aspects or ideas. These two
terms are conceptualised more in details in the further parts of this article. See also Zuba
and Riedel (2015).
R. Riedel (*)
University of Opole, Opole, Poland
e-mail: riedelr@icloud.com
EUROscepticism as an Idea
Euroscepticism is generally and conventionally understood as a negative
attitude towards the European Union, European integration process in
general, some of its aspects or just the idea of uniting the continent in
any respect. More specifically EUROscepticism is defined as a negative
attitude towards the Eurozone, monetary integration on the suprana-
tional level, some of its aspects or ideas and concepts related to it.
Such conceptualising of EUROscepticism and Euroscepticism posi-
tions these two terms/categories in a rich scholarly literature, which
became even more important in the context of the economic crisis that
hit Europe in 2008 as well as the so called “Brexit” referendum (2016)
and its consequences. Therefore the deep understanding of the phenom-
enon, its determinants, mechanisms, effects and side-effects is central in
contemporary research on the European Union. Euroscepticism is not
any longer just an aberration of the mainstream politics in the EU. It
has become an element of the mainstream, at least, after the most recent
elections to the European Parliament (2014) and the “Brexit” referen-
dum (2016). As a result, also scientifically, it is not any more a contextual
EUROSCEPTICISM AND MONETARY SECURITY IN EUROPE 3