Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Women’s Domestic Activity in the Romantic-Period Novel, 1770-1820: Dangerous Occupations 1st Edition Joseph Morrissey (Auth.) full chapter instant download
Women’s Domestic Activity in the Romantic-Period Novel, 1770-1820: Dangerous Occupations 1st Edition Joseph Morrissey (Auth.) full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/see-you-again-dangerous-blooms-
book-3-a-romantic-suspense-novel-kate-breitfeller/
https://ebookmass.com/product/dangerous-women-1st-edition-mark-
de-castrique/
https://ebookmass.com/product/living-as-an-author-in-the-
romantic-period-palgrave-studies-in-the-enlightenment-
romanticism-and-cultures-of-print-1st-ed-2021-edition-matthew-
sangster/
https://ebookmass.com/product/women-writing-the-neo-victorian-
novel-erotic-victorians-1st-ed-edition-kathleen-renk/
Plants and Politics in Padua During the Age of
Revolution, 1820–1848 1st Edition Ariane Dröscher
https://ebookmass.com/product/plants-and-politics-in-padua-
during-the-age-of-revolution-1820-1848-1st-edition-ariane-
droscher/
https://ebookmass.com/product/pretty-guilty-women-a-novel-gina-
lamanna/
https://ebookmass.com/product/when-the-light-went-out-bridget-
morrissey/
https://ebookmass.com/product/constructions-of-the-irish-child-
in-the-independence-period-1910-1940-1st-ed-edition-ciara-boylan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/women-in-johns-gospel-susan-miller/
Women’s Domestic Activity
in the Romantic-Period Novel,
1770–1820
Dangerous Occupations
Women’s Domestic
Activity in the
Romantic-Period
Novel, 1770–1820
Dangerous Occupations
Joseph Morrissey
Coventry University
Coventry, UK
Cover illustration: Lebrecht Music and Arts Photo Library / Alamy Stock Photo
vii
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1 Introduction 1
6 Conclusion 215
Index 221
ix
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
of the Body (Leppert 1993), continues to offer the most thorough exami-
nation we have available of women’s domestic engagement with music in
the period. Leppert approaches the musical act primarily as an ideologi-
cally informed practice, and he is mainly interested in exposing the social
inequality which determines music in ways beneficial to the status quo.
Second, feminist literary critics and historians have emphasised wom-
en’s agency and have shown that ideological discourses did not in fact
determine subjects and practice to the degree suggested by conduct books,
periodicals and novels (among other things). For example, Jennie
Bachelor’s (2010) Women’s Work: Labour, Gender, Authorship, 1750–1830
places the stress on the ways in which women’s engagement with work
shaped their lives as autonomous subjects and writers, highlighting resis-
tance to apparently entrenched gendered conventions rather than confor-
mity. Similarly, Amanda Vickery’s (1998) The Gentleman’s Daughter has
forced an ongoing revaluation of the assumption that women’s sphere of
activity was almost entirely determined by gender and class formations,
which shut women off from public endeavours, as well as enclosed them
rigidly within the confines of their class.
In many ways, this book departs from both the broad perspectives out-
lined above because it is ultimately less concerned with how women’s
activities intersected with the productive relations which partly constituted
them (although this does play a subordinate role), and rather more inter-
ested in day-to-day pursuits on an intimate personal and interpersonal
level. That is, there is rather less emphasis in the following chapters on
whether women’s actions were the consequence of subjection or rather
resistant to it, and a greater emphasis on how domestic activity informed
and was informed by experiences of self, how it felt and how it moulded
friendships and romantic relationships.
A third approach to the topic has been to emphasise how women’s tasks
in the home, sometimes regarded as frivolous or at least only of marginal
social value, actually contributed to broader socioeconomic structures in
important ways, such as seen in Davidoff’s and Hall’s (1987) detailed his-
tory of domesticity in the period, Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the
English Middle Class 1780–1850. This type of analysis is mostly concerned
with the products of women’s endeavours, whether material, cultural or
even political. Because of this, such scholarship is typically less interested
in what motivates women to act, how their actions related to and consoli-
dated their sense of self, and how these actions had profound and often
unanticipated consequences in interpersonal relationships and the wider
INTRODUCTION 3
domestic sphere. The chapters that follow, conversely, aim to offer some
suggestions along these lines.
It might seem that my approach converges in some respects with Nancy
Armstrong’s (1989) Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the
Novel, a book which locates the domestic sphere, female activity and
female subjectivity as key mechanisms in forging the later Victorian ‘Angel
of the House’, and the increased consolidation of male- and female-
defined spheres of activity. I think, however, that the analyses I offer differ
quite markedly from those of Armstrong. My localised studies of select
novels focus less on attempting to understand the female self in relation to
a broad metanarrative of historical change as they do, through a close
focus on domestic action as it unfolds moment by moment, instead offer
ways of understanding women’s day-to-day pursuits at the personal and
interpersonal level. For example, my analysis of needlework in Chap. 1
functions not so much to articulate the practice within an emerging his-
torical experience of subjectivity as to illustrate how the activity might
inform and be informed by the worker’s momentary thoughts and feel-
ings, as well as how it might impact the cognitive-affective processes and
behaviours of immediate observers.
It is this focus on domestic activity as a function of fluctuating psycho-
logical processes and interpersonal relationships from which the book
derives its subtitle, Dangerous Occupations. I consider women’s occupa-
tions as, first and foremost, types of human action. That is, I emphasise
the human messiness and unpredictably of the activities examined here.
The authors I analyse alternatively attempt to articulate women’s domes-
tic pursuits as functions of cultural ideals, as subversive of these ideals, or
simply as vehicles for personal satisfaction. Yet in all cases the presented
activities frequently exceed the parameters set out for them. Sometimes
this plays out as a self-conscious narrative strategy in which a writer
attempts to stake a claim for women’s occupations in opposition to spe-
cific cultural codings which attempt to cast them in specific ways. At
other times, the activities escape the authors’ own control, drawing atten-
tion to the complexity and unpredictability of all human endeavours,
however much cultural values may attempt to maintain control over the
meanings and uses they ostensibly align with. Women’s day-to-day tasks
in the period can be considered as ‘dangerous’ precisely because of the
frequently unanticipated interventions they make into the formation of
self and the forging of agency, intimacy, enmity and romantic attraction,
among other things.
4 J. MORRISSEY
As alluded to, the value of this focus, I think, is that it enables a better
appreciation of women’s work and leisure activities as functions of human
experience. All of the three broad approaches to the topic of women’s
domestic activity outlined at the beginning of this introduction have a
tendency, in my view, to erase the relationship between domestic activity
and the human capacities of, for example, joy, sympathy, self-doubt and
desire. Thus this book participates in the ongoing revaluation of women
in history but does so by examining representations of women in terms of
their individuality and humanity as expressed in their domestic occupa-
tions, rather than seeing them in more general terms as products and pro-
ducers of history.
If, however, activity in this book is primarily defined as human action,
then what exactly is meant by ‘domestic’? How does the notion of domes-
tic relate to concepts such as ‘home’, ‘house’, ‘private’ and ‘public’? John
Tosh (1999, 4) defines domesticity in the nineteenth century as
credible historical narrative, one must work with broad strokes, but at
the expense of relegating to a secondary status the acute feelings that
might arise when one encounters gothic literature for the first time
(Chap. 4), or realises with deep ambivalence the feminine sexual power
inherent in the simple act of spinning linen (Chap. 2). On the other
hand, of course, none of my tightly focused areas of study can make the
claim for broad historical truth. Moreover, the study concentrates on
novels, a form of aesthetic representation with a far from straightforward
relationship with the ‘lived’ reality it alternatively represents, idealises,
critiques and creates. Nevertheless, I do believe that my analyses of how
women writers engaged the themes of domestic activity provide us with
new ways of thinking about women’s daily actions at the most intimately
subjective level.
In the same vein, I do not claim that my particular selection of authors
and texts offers a representative view of the topic. Even so, through the
literature covered, I engage alternatively with the novel of manners, melo-
drama, parody and the sentimental/gothic traditions. Similarly, my selec-
tion of authors (Jane Austen, Charlotte Smith, Francis Burney) bring to
bear specific personal narratives and approaches to the novel which create
a multiplicity of perspectives and offer suggestive lines of thought in inter-
preting the reality of women’s domestic pursuits at the level of personal
engagement.
For example, in the case of Jane Austen, her particular way of engaging
fictional themes coincides with my approach in this book. Critics have
long debated how far Austen’s ostensibly domestic and women-centred
fictional worlds engage wider sociopolitical concerns, with scholars alter-
natively arguing that she sensibly restricts herself to all she has first-hand
knowledge of (the domestic sphere); or that she does indeed probe
broader societal concerns but from a coherent conservative perspective; or
that she is in fact deeply subversive, concealing astute critique of the status
quo beneath the polished veneer of her playful literary interventions.
In my view, all of the above views hold some weight, but it is the hier-
archy in which they ordered which is most decisive, and which makes her
most valuable for our purposes. I would suggest that, primarily, Austen’s
novels are about the day-to-day concerns of genteel women, but that she
is nevertheless alert to the fact that domesticity is both a product and a
producer of wider social institutions (whether material or ideological).
Further, I think a moderate conservatism informs her work, but that this
is a very self-conscious political position which by no means suggests that
INTRODUCTION 7
everything is just as it should be, and which also, moreover, tends to locate
itself within the primary theme of domesticity. Austen, that is, certainly
does not shy away from exposing social contradictions, but she tends to do
so at the level of quotidian subjectivity and interpersonal relationships
rather than at the political level as such.
For instance, in Mansfield Park, Austen’s representations of needlework
often support ideological constructions of the domestic genteel lady, but
they also stake a claim for the female agency and social value that the activ-
ity encodes, often in direct contrast to misogynistic views which tend to
cast needlework as frivolous. Thus her focus is primarily on needlework as
a function of genteel domesticity, but it explores the implications of the
work act in the context of the differing ideologies which inform the
thoughts, feelings and behaviours that constitute domestic life. This
approach maps almost exactly onto the stated aims of this book.
Charlotte Smith, by contrast, was a vocal contributor to radical politics
and the theorisations of feeling and reason which underwrote radical views
of gender, race, nationalism and other social structures. At the same time,
she suffered greatly at the hands of patriarchal law, which gifted her prof-
ligate husband, Benjamin, rights over her person and finances, and which
also embroiled her in a life-long battle to obtain an inheritance willed to
her in lieu of Benjamin, but which, because of legal technicalities, she was
unable to lay her hands on until very close to her death. For Smith, writing
was a way of providing the means of subsistence for her large family, and
her family life was itself marked by suffering: Smith was seriously affected
by the deaths of several of her children.2
Unsurprisingly, the potent mix of deep sociopolitical engagement and
personal tragedy (the latter created in part by the status quo itself) seems to
find its way into Smith’s treatment of women’s daily endeavours. Thus
women’s domestic activity in Smith’s work is presented with biting c ynicism.
Less interested, as Austen is, in recovering the inherent value of embroider-
ing a dress or reading a gothic novel, Smith mobilises female occupations as
damning indictments against the status quo. They are double-edged liter-
ary representations, at once emblematic of women’s subjection and also the
means of exposing the harsh realities of gender inequality. Through Smith,
therefore, this book is able to consider women’s domestic occupations at
their most subversive. For example, needlework in The Old Manor House is
powerfully implicated in male desire, but this desire is sublimated in the
mind of the text’s hero into the sentimental narrative of paternalistic male
protection. Through this, the text destabilises Burkean ideology by e xposing
8 J. MORRISSEY
the sexual energy which underwrites it, and which women’s work with
spinning wheels and needles puts into motion.
Frances Burney, the final author studied in this book, also brings a unique
perspective to the table. Her father, Charles, gave birth to the study of music
as a serious academic discipline, and her sister, Esther, was nothing short of
a genius in virtuoso musical performance. But Frances’ familial relationships
are almost textbook studies in psychoanalytical repression, deeply divided
between love and resentment, deference and defiance. As one might expect,
Burney’s treatment of musical accomplishment is marked by deep contra-
diction. Unlike the balance of Austen or the cynicism of Smith, Burney
alternatively presents music at the polar extremes. It is a source of profound
joy and agency, and she argues for the value of music beyond purely ideo-
logical functions. At the same time, music represents intolerable alienation
and the repression of real personal needs, and it is ultimately pressed, with
deep ambivalence, into the service of the status quo.
My selection of female authors, therefore, does not provide a systematic
approach to the topic but rather seeks to acknowledge the importance of
subjective difference. Nevertheless, all three of the writers examined self-
identified with the genteel class (however tenuously), allowing for some
stability and coherence of argument. This is not to suggest, though, that
the genteel class is a special case in point: complementary analyses of
women in the labouring, working-middle or aristocratic classes would cer-
tainly be welcome. In terms of the literary texts themselves, decisions here
were based on which novels engage the domestic activities I examine most
productively. Specifically, the chapters discuss Austen’s Mansfield Park
(1814) and Northanger Abbey (1817), Smith’s The Old Manor House
(1793) and Ethelinde (1789), and Burney’s The Wanderer (1814).
Regarding the domestic activities themselves, I wanted to explore occu-
pations central to women’s lives in the period, as well as a range of activi-
ties which engaged the concept of work as well as leisure, which were
related to privacy as well as to sociability, and which were alternatively
thought of as practical, artistic or functions of mind. No activity was per-
haps more central to the lives of women of all classes than needlework, so
this seemed an obvious starting point. Accomplishment in music was also
a common feature of a genteel lady’s repertoire, but it encodes a perfor-
mative element which distinguishes it from work with needles and pins
(although I will argue that needlework, too, is in some ways better thought
of as a public endeavour). Moreover, the two activities situate—in differ-
INTRODUCTION 9
experiences which inform those acts, which are transformed by them and
which impact the subjectivities of observers.
In this context, however, stage plays might seem just as fruitful.
Nevertheless, I would suggest that they are not as suitable for my purposes
because of their relatively limited capacity to narrate the internal world.
The character monologue of the stage play lacks the nuance available to
narrators in novels. The latter are able to move quickly from one charac-
ter’s thoughts and feelings to those of another, and are also able to explain
the internal world of several characters during the same event in the time
of the story. In other words, a narrator in a novel could describe in detail
the subjective responses of several characters all watching the same young
lady play the piano. Such insight into multiple internal worlds is less easily
available in drama (especially when read rather than performed).
Four chapters and a conclusion follow this introduction. Chapter 2
focuses on needlework through readings of Smith’s The Old Manor House
and Austen’s Mansfield Park. In terms of the former, I challenge the dis-
missal in criticism of the novel’s heroine, Monimia, as an uninteresting
archetype of female subservience by demonstrating that it is this very gen-
erality which reveals the possible effects of needlework on the social econ-
omy. Specifically, the chapter argues that Monimia’s character is heavily
defined by the image of her at work, and that through this, Smith is able
to expose the idealised romance and sexual desire which underwrites the
feelings of the text’s hero, Orlando. In this way, The Old Manor House
configures the spinning and sewing of a female dependent as a potent
force in structuring the social and economic relations of the country
estate, Rayland Hall, around which most of the action revolves.
In Mansfield Park, needlework is also presented as a subtle but potent
force in creating social relations, but here the emphasis is rather less on
exposing the contradictions of gender ideology than it is on constructing
women’s work as a function of agency. For example, Fanny is able to
cement her relationship with Lady Bertram through her work, as well as
smooth relations with her Aunt Norris and cousins. In a similar if less posi-
tive vein, Mrs Norris employs needlework to consolidate her power over
Fanny and the social economy of Mansfield Park more generally.
Austen also emphasises needlework as an intensely private activity
which provides women with time to think and reflect—that is, to soothe
the anxieties of day-to-day life. Even so, these moments of personal
autonomy are consistently threatened by the pervasive view of women at
work as silently crying for male attention, demurely signifying their sexual
INTRODUCTION 11