Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order 6703923
Order 6703923
Order 6703923
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code
Instructor
Date
2
Regression Statistics
0.42791599
Multiple R 3
0.18311209
R Square 7
Adjusted R 0.15393752
Square 9
Standard Error 30060.4762
Observations 30
ANOVA
Significance
df SS MS F F
6.27642873 0.01832730
Regression 1 5671583293 5671583293 8 9
Residual 28 25301702423 903632229.4
Total 29 30973285716
Based on the simple linear regression summary output, there is a significant difference in
salary between male and female non-production workers at Columbus Custom Carpentry, F =
6.28, p < 0.05. Variable 'Gender_Female' has a coefficient of -27,747.04, with p < 0.05. We
reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in salary between genders. The negative
coefficient suggests that female non-production workers earn, on average, $27,747.04 less than
their male counterparts. This points towards a gender pay gap among non-production workers at
the company.
3
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.81773271
R Square 0.668686785
Adjusted R Square 0.599663199
Standard Error 20677.94605
Observations 30
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 5 20711426851 4142285370 9.687801224 3.67068E-05
Residual 24 10261858866 427577452.7
Total 29 30973285716
The multiple linear regression analysis results for the non-production workers at
Columbus Custom Carpentry suggest several insights into factors affecting salaries. Notably, the
regression model has a high R Square value of 0.668686785, indicating that approximately
66.87% of the variability in salary is explained by the model's predictors. After controlling for
other factors in the model, the coefficient for Gender_Female is not statistically significant (p =
0.509). This suggests that the observed pay difference in the simple linear regression may be due
The variable 'Job Type_Managerial' has a statistically significant positive effect on salary
(coefficient = 50027.03, p < 0.0001). However, the variables 'Age,' 'Race_NonWhite,' and 'Years
of Service' did not significantly predict salary, p > 0.05. This suggests that these factors do not
4
significantly impact salary differences when other variables are considered within this non-
Opinion: The data analysis indicates no statistically significant difference in salary between
male and female non-production workers when controlling for other factors such as years of
service. This suggests that gender alone does not significantly predict salary disparities within
this group.
Suggestions:
Maintain Pay Equity: Given that gender does not appear to be a significant driver of salary
differences in non-production roles, continue to ensure that the company maintains pay equity
policies. Regularly review and update compensation structures to ensure that all employees,
regardless of gender, are compensated fairly for their roles and contributions.
Focus on Other Factors: While gender does not seem to be a significant factor, the analysis
highlights the importance of job type. Employees in managerial positions earn significantly
higher salaries. Consider conducting a thorough review of the promotion and career development
processes to ensure that opportunities for managerial roles are accessible to all employees,
irrespective of gender.
Regular Pay Audits: Implement regular pay audits and reviews to monitor and address any
emerging pay disparities. This includes assessing compensation based on variables other than
gender, such as job performance, education, and experience. These audits can help identify and
rectify any unintended pay gaps that may arise over time.
5
Training and Education: Provide training and education programs on diversity, inclusion, and
unconscious bias to all employees. Awareness and education can contribute to a more inclusive
workplace culture.
Regular Data Analysis: Conduct regular data analyses to identify any changes or trends in pay
disparities. Monitor the impact of implemented strategies and adjust them as needed to ensure