Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IB YR 1 2024_MICRO_SL
IB YR 1 2024_MICRO_SL
Quantity Quality
Land
Labour
Capital
How do economists approach the world?
- Economic methodology
- The role of positive economics
- The use of logic
- The use of hypotheses, models, theories
- The ceteris paribus assumption
- Empirical Evidence
- Reputation
- The role of normative economics
- Value judgements in policy making
Economic thought
- 18th century: Adam Smith and laissez faire
- 19th century: Classical microeconomics, Marxist critique
- 20th century: Keynesian revolution, rise of macroeconomic policy, monetarist /
new classical counter revolution
- 21st century: increasing dialogue with other disciplines such as psychology
and the growing role of behavioural economics; increasing awareness of the
interdependencies that exist between the economy, society and environment
and the need to appreciate the compelling reasons for moving toward a
circular economy
Microeconomics
How do consumers and producers make choices in trying
to meet their economic objectives?
- Interaction between consumers and producers in a market is the main
mechanism through which resources are directed to meet the needs and
wants in an economy.
- Consumer and producer choices are the outcome of complex decision-making.
- Welfare is maximized if allocative efficiency is achieved.
- Constant change produces dynamic markets
Demand
- Definition: the willingness and the ability to
purchase at a given price at a given time
- The law of demand: inverse relationship
between price and quantity demanded
- Assumptions underlying the law of demand
- The income effect
- The substitution effect
- The law of diminishing marginal utility
- Each individual consumer’s demand curve
accumulated becomes a market demand
Movements along the curve vs. Shifts of the curve
- Movement along - Shift (factors affecting demand)
- Income
- Tastes and preferences
- Future price expectations
- Price of related goods
- Substitutes
- Complements
- Number of consumers
Supply
- Definition: the willingness and the ability to sell at a given price at a given time
- The law of supply: direct relationship between price and quantity supplied
- The law of diminishing marginal returns
- Increasing marginal costs
Movements along the curve vs. Shifts of the curve
- Movement along - Shift (factors affecting supply)
- Changes in costs of factors of production
- Productivity
- Prices of related goods
- Joint supply
- Competitive supply
- Indirect taxation
- Subsidies
- Future price expectations
- Number of firms
Disequilibrium
- Excess Demand (Shortage) - Excess Supply (Surplus)
Price mechanism
- Signalling function: prices perform a signalling function (they adjust to demonstrate where resources
are required)
- Prices rise and fall to reflect scarcities and surpluses
- If prices are rising because of high demand from consumers, this is a signal to suppliers to
expand production to meet the higher demand
- If there is excess supply in a market, the price mechanism will help to eliminate a surplus of a
good by allowing the market price to fall
- Incentive function
- Through choices consumers send information to producers about their changing nature of
needs and wants
- Producers/consumers are incentivized to increase/decrease their Qs/Qd
- Rationing function
- Prices ration scarce resources when demand outstrips supply
- When there is a shortage, price is bid up - leaving only those with willingness and ability to pay
to buy
Competitive market equilibrium
- Excess Demand (Shortage) - Excess Supply (Surplus)
Consumer and Producer Surplus
- Market Equilibrium: Achieved at the price at
which quantities demanded and supplied are
equal. Also known as the state of no change.
- Consumer Surplus: Consumers’ willingness and
the ability to purchase minus the actual price
they pay.
- Producer Surplus: The actual price producers
receive minus producers’ willingness and the
ability to supply.
- Social welfare = consumer surplus + producer
surplus
- Social welfare is maximized at the equilibrium (Qd =
Qs)
- When social welfare is maximized = allocative
efficiency
- Loss of social welfare = deadweight loss
- DWL represents the losses to buyers and sellers
Elasticities
- Concept of elasticity
- Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)
- Price Elasticity of Supply (PES)
- Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)
Price Elasticities of Demand [1]
- Formula:
- Degrees of YED
- YED < 0
- 0 < YED < 1
- 1 < YED
Price Elasticity of Supply [1]
- Formula
- Consumers
Price Floors (Minimum Prices)
- To be effective, the price control has to be
above the equilibrium price
- Aim:
- Impact on:
- Producers
- Consumers
Indirect Taxation
- Producers
- Consumers
- Government
Tax burden
- The incidence of taxes and subsidies depends on the elasticity of supply and
demand
→ More inelastic party (consumers/producers) will be burdened with a higher incidence
Evaluation
- Time: in the short run, firms/consumers may not respond as much - firms may
not exit the market/consumers may continue to purchase a similar amount
- Magnitude: this fall in TR, profit and income would depend on the extent of
change in taxation
- Elasticity: if PED is inelastic, firms can pass on the increase in taxation to
consumers in a form of higher price → limited contraction in the Qd and TR
- Burden: producer/consumer burden depends on the relative elasticity of PED
and PES - more inelastic party will bear a higher burden
- DWL
- Government
- If PED is elastic, ineffective in raising tax revenue
- If PED is inelastic, ineffective in reducing the market output
Subsidies
- Aim:
- Impact on:
- Producers
- Consumers
- Government
Evaluation
- Time: in the short run, firms may not respond as much
- Magnitude
- Gain: producer/consumer gain depends on the relative elasticity of PED and
PES - more inelastic party will bear a higher burden
- DWL (a loss to social welfare)
- If PED is inelastic, ineffective in increasing the market output
- The burden of subsidy - opportunity cost arising → the government could
have spent the money elsewhere
- burden on taxpayers
Microeconomics
Market Failure - Externalities
Socially Efficient and Inefficient Market Outcomes
- Social efficiency
- the optimal quantity of a good occurs where the marginal benefit of consuming the last unit equals the
marginal cost of producing that last unit, thus maximizing total economic surplus. The market
equilibrium quantity is equal to the socially optimal quantity only when all social benefits and costs are
internalized by individuals in the market. Total economic surplus is maximized at that quantity.
- Private incentives can lead to actions by rational agents that are socially undesirable
(inefficient) market outcomes
- Rational agents can pursue private actions to exploit or exercise market characteristics known as
market power. Rational agents make optimal decisions by equating private marginal benefits and
private marginal costs that can result in market inefficiencies.
- Policymakers use cost-benefit analysis to evaluate different actions to reduce or
eliminate market inefficiencies
- Market inefficiencies can be eliminated by designing policies that equate marginal social benefit with
marginal social cost.
Equilibrium allocations being inefficient
- Market failure happens when the price mechanism fails to allocate scarce
resources efficiently or when the operation of market forces lead to a net
social welfare loss
- Market failure exists when the competitive outcome of markets is not
satisfactory from the point of view of society. What is satisfactory nearly
always involves value judgements
- Equilibrium allocations can deviate from efficient allocations due to situations
such
- Externalities: positive/negative externalities in production or consumption
- Merit/demerit goods
- Insufficient production of public goods
- Common pool resources
- Known as “Market Failures”
Externalities
- Spill-over effect to the third party arising from consumption and / or production
of goods and services without an appropriate compensation is paid
- Negative externalities: causing the social cost of production / consumption to
exceed the private cost
- Positive externalities: causing the social benefit of production / consumption
to exceed the private benefit
Terminology
- Marginal Private Cost: Per unit change in cost arising to producers from producing
- Marginal External Cost: Per unit change in cost arising to the third party (externalities)
- MEC > 0: external cost (negative externalities)
- MEC < 0: positive externalities
- Marginal Social Cost: Per unit change in cost arising to the society.
- MPC + MEC = MSC
- MSC > MPC
- MSC < MPC
- Marginal Private Benefit: Per unit change in benefit arising to consumers from consuming
- Marginal External Benefit: Per unit change in benefit arising to the third party (externalities)
- MEB > 0: external benefit (positive externalities)
- MEB < 0: negative externalities
- Marginal Social Benefit: Per unit change in benefit arising to the society.
- MPB + MEB = MSB
- MSB > MPB
- MSB < MPB
Equilibrium points
- Market Equilibrium: MPB = MPC
- Socially Optimal Output: MSB = MSC
- Allocative efficiency; social / community surplus maximized
Negative Externalities of Production
NEP - Government intervention [1]
● Indirect taxation: increasing the cost of production → decrease in supply
○ Internalizing the cost
○ Making the polluters pay
○ MPC + unit of taxation (MEC) = MSC
■ Evaluation
● Assigning the right of taxation is impossible
● Placing a monetary value on externalities is difficult
● Consumer welfare effect: if PED is inelastic, producers may pass on the burden to consumers →
regressive effect
● If PED is inelastic, limited contraction
● Regulation (Tradable pollution Permit)
○ limiting the total amount of emission and distributing permits to each firms → allow to trade
○ Firms have an incentive to invest incentive to invest in clean technology, firms are able to bank their permits for
future use
■ Evaluation
● Firms may pass the cost of purchasing permits on to their consumers leading to higher price
● Cost of enforcement (regulation) → burden on taxpayers
● Difficulties in establishing the “right” level of permits
NEP - Government intervention [2]
● Limit/Ban
○ Decreasing the supply/demand curve
● Price control (maximum/minimum price)
Negative Externalities of Consumption
Government intervention
● Indirect tax
● Regulation
● Public Campaign
Positive Externalities of Production
Government intervention
● Subsidies
● Direct provision from the government
Positive Externalities of Consumption
Government intervention
● Subsidies
● Direct provision from the government
● Provision of information (public campaign)
○ Provision of information (public campaign)
■ Arguments for ‘advertising’
● transmission (chain of reasoning): advertisement showing the benefits/positive spill-over effect to
the society may positive alters consumers’ taste and preferences → increase the demand curve
→ (ideally) MPB + information = MSB
● advertising can create a wider understanding to the impacts → Can arouse wise expenditure of
the society → ultimately change the behaviour of consumers (long-term benefit)
● this could be less costly compared to a direct provision/ subsidy
■ Arguments against ‘advertising’ (evaluation)
● consumers/public may already be aware of the consequences (third party effect) → ineffective
● Costly → burden on taxpayer
● unlike regulation or taxation, reaching the socially optimal point is harder (hard to measure the
‘right’ amount of the provision of information)
Steps of drawing an externality diagram
1. Production (2 cost curves, 1 benefit curve) vs. Consumption (2 benefit curves,
1 cost curve)
2. Negative (Private on the right side) vs. Positive (Social on the right side)
3. Market equilibrium: MPC = MPB
4. Socially optimal point: MSC = MSB
Broad government intervention in response to externalities
- Indirect (Pigouvian) taxes
- Carbon taxes
- Legislation and regulation
- Education—awareness creation
- Tradable permits
- International agreements
- Collective self-governance
- Subsidies
- Government provision
Strengths and limitations of government policies to correct
externalities
- Challenges involved in measurement of externalities
- Degree of effectiveness
- Consequences for stakeholders
Public Goods
- Non-rivalrous
- consumption of a good by one person does not reduce the amount available for others
- Non-excludable
- The benefits derived from pure public goods cannot be confined solely to those who have paid
for it. Indeed non-payers can enjoy the benefits of consumption at no financial cost –
economists call this the ‘free-rider’ problem. With private goods, consumption ultimately
depends on the ability to pay
- Free-rider Problem
- Government intervention
- Direct provision
- Contracting out to the private sector
Public goods - direct provision for/against
● Arguments for
○ as non-excludability shows, the private sector won’t be willing to provide yet the society needs such
product (application) - and it is the government’s role to correct allocations within the market
○ with the problem of being unable to charge consumers at the point of usage, the government has the
ability to impose taxation on consumers after the use (many public goods are provided free at the
point of use and then funded by taxation or a charge)
○ State provision may help to prevent under-provision and under-consumption which may lead to an
improvement of social welfare - the government can solve inequality as well - provision to those
needed (providing essential public goods helps affordability and access to important services for lower
income households and therefore help to address inequalities of income)
● Arguments against
○ burden on taxpayers
○ efficiency: the governments may lack efficiency compared to a private sector business due to a lack of
profit incentive
○ information failure: the government do not possess perfect information - hard to correctly decide the
socially optimal point of output
Common Pool or Common Access Resources
- Characteristics
- Rivalry
- Non-excludable
- “Tragedy of commons”
- Threats to sustainability
- extraction of non-renewable resources → external cost (such as air pollution) →
environmental damage
- extraction of non-renewable resources → resource depletion of limited resources
- agriculture → soil erosion, deforestation, desertification
- Unsustainable production creating negative externalities
Government intervention
● Licensing (private ownership/ allocation of property rights)
● International agreement (cap)
● Subsidising
● Regulating the total amount (fishing permit)
● International aid to support LEDCs
Evaluation
● cost of administering
● imperfect information possessed by the government
● cost of subsidy/aid → dependency culture may arise/ burden on tax payers