Professional Documents
Culture Documents
unit-1 Notes-
unit-1 Notes-
unit-1 Notes-
MEANING OF FINANCE
Finance may be defined as the art and science of managing money. It includes financial
services and financial instruments. Finance also is referred as the provision of money at the
time when it is needed. The finance function is the procurement of funds and their effective
utilization in business concerns.
The concept of finance includes capital, funds, money, and amount. But each word is having
unique meaning. Studying and understanding the concept of finance become an important
part of the business concern
According to Khan and Jain, “Finance is the art and science of managing money”.
According to Wheeler, “Business finance is that business activity which concerns with the
acquisition and conversation of capital funds in meeting financial needs and overall
objectives of a business enterprise”.
According to the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, “Corporation finance deals with the
financial problems of corporate enterprises. These problems include the financial aspects of
the promotion of new enterprises and their administration during early development, the
accounting problems connected with the distinction between capital and income, the
administrative questions created by growth and expansion, and finally, the financial
adjustments required for the bolstering up or rehabilitation of a corporation which has come
into financial difficulties”.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Sources Of Finance:
1. Based on the Period
(1) Long-term sources of finance include:
• Equity Shares
• Preference Shares
• Debenture
• Long-term Loans
• Fixed Deposits
(2)Short-term source of finance include:
• Bank Credit
• Customer Advances
• Trade Credit
• Factoring
• Public Deposits
• Money Market Instruments
2. Based on Ownership
(1) An ownership source of finance include
• Shares capital, earnings
• Retained earnings
• Surplus and Profits
(2) Borrowed capital include
• Debenture
• Bonds
• Public deposits
• Loans from Bank and Financial Institutions.
3. Based on Sources of Generation
Sources of Finance may be classified into various categories based on the period.
The risk/return tradeoff only indicates that higher risk levels are associated with the
possibility of higher returns, but nothing is guaranteed. At the same time, higher risk also
means higher potential losses on an investment.Higher risk is associated with greater
probability of higher return and lower risk with a greater probability of smaller return. This
trade off which an investor faces between risk and return while considering investment
decisions is called the risk return trade off.
• Higher risk is associated with greater probability of higher return, lower risk with a
greater probability of smaller return.
• This trade off which an investor faces between risk and return while considering
investment decisions is called the risk return trade off.
Risk and return
Every saving and investment product involves different risks and returns. The investors are
exposed to both systematic and unsystematic risks.
1. Systematis risk is the risk inherent to the entire market or market segment, and it can
affect a large number of assets. Also known as undiversifiable risk, volatility and market risk,
systematic risk affects the overall market – not just a particular stock or industry. This type of
risk is both unpredictable and impossible to avoid completely. Examples include interest rate
changes, inflation, recessions and wars.
2. Unsystematic risk on the other hand, risk affects a very small number of assets. Also
called non-systematic risk, specific risk, diversifiable risk and residual risk, this type of risk
refers to the uncertainty inherent in a company or industry investment. Examples include a
change in management, a product recall, a regulatory change that could drive down company
sales and a new competitor in the marketplace with the potential to take away market share
from a company in which you’re invested. It’s possible to mitigate unsystematic risks through
diversification.
Market risk: The risk of investments declining in value because of economic developments
or other events that affect the entire market. The main types of market risk are equity risk,
interest rate risk and currency risk.
• Equity risk – applies to an investment in shares. The market price of shares varies all
the time depending on demand and supply. Equity risk is the risk of loss because of a
drop in the market price of shares.
• Interest rate risk – applies to debt investments such as bonds. It is the risk of losing
money because of a change in the interest rate. For example, if the interest rate goes
up, the market value of bonds will drop.
• Currency risk – applies when you own foreign investments. It is the risk of losing
money because of a movement in the exchange rate. For example, if the U.S. dollar
becomes less valuable relative to the Canadian dollar, your U.S. stocks will be worth
less in Canadian dollars.
2. Liquidity risk: The risk of being unable to sell your investment at a fair price and get your
money out when you want to. To sell the investment, you may need to accept a lower price.
In some cases, such as exempt market investments, it may not be possible to sell the
investment at all.
3. Concentration risk: The risk of loss because your money is concentrated in 1 investment
or type of investment. When you diversify your investments, you spread the risk over
different types of investments, industries and geographic locations.
4. Credit risk: The risk that the government entity or company that issued the bond will run
into financial difficulties and won’t be able to pay the interest or repay the principal at
maturity. Credit risk applies to debt investments such as bonds. You can evaluate credit risk
by looking at the credit rating of the bond. For example, long-term Canadian government
bonds have a credit rating of AAA, which indicates the lowest possible credit risk.
5. Reinvestment risk: The risk of loss from reinvesting principal or income at a lower
interest rate. Suppose you buy a bond paying 5%. Reinvestment risk will affect you if interest
rates drop and you have to reinvest the regular interest payments at 4%. Reinvestment risk
will also apply if the bond matures and you have to reinvest the principal at less than 5%.
Reinvestment risk will not apply if you intend to spend the regular interest payments or the
principal at maturity
6. Inflation risk:The risk of a loss in your purchasing power because the value of your
investments does not keep up with inflation. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of money
over time – the same amount of money will buy fewer goods and services. Inflation risk is
particularly relevant if you own cash or debt investments like bonds. Shares offer some
protection against inflation because most companies can increase the prices they charge to
their customers. Share prices should therefore rise in line with inflation. Real estate also
offers some protection because landlords can increase rents over time.
7. Horizon risk:The risk that your investment horizon may be shortened because of an
unforeseen event, for example, the loss of your job. This may force you to sell investments
that you were expecting to hold for the long term. If you must sell at a time when the markets
are down, you may lose money.
8. Foreign investment risk:The risk of loss when investing in foreign countries. When you
buy foreign investments, for example, the shares of companies in emerging markets, you face
risks that do not exist in Canada, for example, the risk of nationalization.
Corporate Governance
Corporate governance is a system that guides the conduct of the people within an
organization, as well as the direction of the organization itself.
Corporate governance is altogether different from the daily operational decisions and
activities that are executed by the management of an organization. Corporate governance is
the domain of the Board of Directors, as opposed to its management team (such as
the CEO and other C-suite executives).
Corporate governance is a system (or a function); it’s not a job title or a specific role.
Some of the many domains for which the corporate governance function is respons-
ible include risk management, strategic planning, talent management, and succession
planning.
Evolving market dynamics and economic realities are putting pressure on the corpor-
ate governance functions at organizations around how stakeholder needs are identified
and managed.
A healthy corporate governance function requires a clear and formal separation of du-
ties between management and the Board.
PepsiCo
It's common to hear about examples of bad corporate governance. In fact, it's often why
companies end up in the news. You rarely hear about companies with good corporate gover-
nance because their corporate guiding policies keep them out of trouble.
One company that has consistently practiced good corporate governance and seeks to update
it often is PepsiCo. In drafting its 2020 proxy statement, PepsiCo sought input from in -
vestors in six areas:
Board composition, diversity, and refreshment, plus leadership structure
Long-term strategy, corporate purpose, and sustainability issues
Good governance practices and ethical corporate culture
Human capital management
Compensation discussion and analysis
Shareholder and stakeholder engagement5
The company included in its proxy statement a graphic of its current leadership structure. It
showed a combined chair and CEO along with an independent presiding director and a link
between the company's "Winning with Purpose" vision and changes to the executive com -
pensation program.
Current Trends & Corporate Governance Pressures
Beyond the expansion in scope from shareholder to stakeholder primacy, there are some in-
teresting, current trends that are putting significant pressures on the corporate governance
functions within organizations of all sizes.
Some examples are:
The “Great Resignation”
The so-called “Great Resignation” has created an environment where the very nature of work
(as we once knew it) has changed. Firms must consider remote and hybrid working arrange-
ments when planning to hire.
While this presents challenges, it has also opened the door to a much broader talent pool
since companies are no longer required to hire people that live within commuting distance of
the nearest office.
Climate change
Leadership at many organizations is realizing that climate change presents more than just en-
vironmental risks – it can present existential risks to business operations (due to physical cli-
mate impacts, regulatory-driven “transition risks,” and potential reputational damage).
With so many organizations making pledges to meet “Net Zero” or even carbon neutral emis-
sions targets, having BOD representation with some ESG experience has become paramount
in order to navigate the ESG disclosure landscape and to avoid the perception of green wash-
ing.
Agency Problem
An agency problem is a conflict of interest inherent in any relationship where one party is
expected to act in another's best interests. In corporate finance, an agency problem usually
refers to a conflict of interest between a company's management and the company's
stockholders.
The agency problem can be defined as a conflict when the agents entrusted with the responsi-
bility of looking after the interests of the principals choose to use the power or authority for
their benefits and in corporate finance. It is a conflict of interest between its management
and stockholders.
It is a common problem in almost every
organization, whether a church, club,
company or government institution. A
conflict of interest occurs when respon-
sible people misuse their authority and
power for personal benefits. However, it
can be resolved if only the organizations
are willing to fix it.
The management of an organization may have goals that are most likely derived to maximize
their benefits. On the other hand, an organization’s stockholders are most likely interested in
their wealth maximization. This contrast between the goals and objectives of the
management and stockholders of an organization may often become a basis for agency
problems. Precisely speaking, there are three types which are discussed below: –
Stockholders vs. Management – Large companies may have many equity holders. It
is always crucial for an organization to separate management from ownership since there is
no reason to form a management part. Segregating rights from management has endless ad-
vantages as it does not affect regular business operations. The company will hire profession-
als to manage the key functions of the same. But hiring outsiders may become troublesome
for stakeholders. The managers hired may make unjust decisions and misuse the sharehold-
ers’ money, which can be a reason for the conflict of interests between the two and agency
problems.
Stockholders vs. Creditors – The stockholders might pick up risky projects to make
more profits. This increased risk might elevate the required ROR on the company’s debt.
Hence, the overall value of the pending debts might fall. If the project sinks, the bondholders
will supposedly have to participate in losses, resulting in agency problems with the stock-
holders and the creditors.
ABC Ltd. sells gel toothpaste for $20. The company’s stockholders raised the selling price of
the toothpaste from $20 to $22 to maximize their wealth. This sudden unnecessary rise in the
cost of toothpaste disappointed the customers and boycotted the product sold by the com-
pany. Few customers who bought the product realized a fall in the quality and were utterly
disappointed. It resulted in agency problems between the stockholders and the loyal and regu-
lar customers of the company.
1. Transparency
To reduce the potential influx of agency problems, it is crucial for both the principal and the
agent to be completely transparent with one another.
Decisions and transactions that will be implemented must be agreed upon by each party and
must be reasonably fair.
Once transparency is present, conflict is reduced due to the fact that there is less confusion on
decision-making and fewer implications that one party is against the other.
2. Restrictions
Imposing restrictions or abolishing negative restrictions is a good way to significantly reduce
the effect of agency loss.
Setting specific restrictions on factors such as agency power allows the principal to feel more
confident in their relative agent.
Conversely, abolishing negative restrictions is beneficial because it instills trust within the
agent and allows them to make decisions freely on behalf of the principal.
3. Bonuses
Introducing and eradicating incentives and bonuses lessens the chances of a relationship that
consists of conflicts and disagreements.
Introducing bonuses is a good way to motivate an agent and will allow them to make deci-
sions with the best intentions of the principal in order to achieve their desired incentive.
Contrarily, bonuses may motivate the agent to make decisions just for financial gain, disre-
garding the best intentions of the principal to only achieve the incentive.
Each relationship between a principal and agent is different, it is crucial to choose the best-
fitted methods for each specific situation to ensure a positive, healthy relationship.