Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download The Purposes of Education: A Conversation Between John Hattie and Steen Nepper Larsen 1st Edition John Hattie file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download The Purposes of Education: A Conversation Between John Hattie and Steen Nepper Larsen 1st Edition John Hattie file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/visible-learning-the-sequel-1st-
edition-john-hattie/
https://ebookmass.com/product/drega-an-alien-warrior-romance-
fated-mates-of-the-sarkarnii-book-3-hattie-jacks/
https://ebookmass.com/product/react-hooks-in-action-meap-03-john-
larsen-larsen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/commedia-dellarte-its-structure-
and-tradition-antonio-fava-in-conversation-with-john-rudlin-john-
rudlin/
Philosophy and Practical Education John Wilson
https://ebookmass.com/product/philosophy-and-practical-education-
john-wilson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/philosophy-and-engineering-
education-john-heywood/
https://ebookmass.com/product/what-lies-between-us-john-marrs/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-christian-academic-in-higher-
education-the-consecration-of-learning-1st-edition-john-sullivan-
auth/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-selected-letters-of-john-
berryman-1st-edition-john-berryman/
The Purposes of Education
What are the purposes of education and what is the relationship between educational research
and policy? Using the twin lenses of Visible Learning and educational philosophy, these are among
the many fascinating topics discussed in extended conversations between John Hattie and Steen
Nepper Larsen. This wide-ranging and informative book offers fundamental propositions
about the nature of education. It maps out in fascinating detail a coming together of Hattie’s
empirical data and world-famous Visible Learning paradigm with the rich heritage of educational
philosophy. Additionally, it explores the inevitable questions of the purpose of education and the
development of students in a learning society.
Part clash of cultures, part meeting of minds, always fascinating and illuminating, this intriguing
book will inspire teachers, students, and parents at all levels of the educational system – from
kindergarten through school to university.
Conversations include:
What are the purposes of education?
Does educational data speak for itself?
What is the role of the teacher?
Is learning a visible phenomenon?
Is it important to teach and learn specific subjects?
What is the role of neuroscience research?
What is the relationship between educational research and educational politics?
What is the role of the state in education?
John Hattie is Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne, Australia, and his Visible
Learning series of books have been translated into 23 different languages and have sold over
1 million copies.
Steen Nepper Larsen is Associate Professor in Education Science at the Danish School of
Education, Aarhus University, Denmark, and has published numerous academic books and
journal articles. He is a critic connected to the Danish newspaper Information, among other
organizations, and has worked on several popular philosophy programs for Danmarks Radio, P1.
The Purposes of Education
A Conversation Between John Hattie
and Steen Nepper Larsen
Introduction1
I The encounter 5
V How not to objectify the students and pupils you are studying 99
VIII Is it possible to revitalize the German concept of Bildung (i.e., the
formation of character and the higher ideas and ideals of education)? 175
IX How to differentiate between the how, what, and why of education 197
v
Contents
References 307
List of abbreviations 317
Glossary* 318
Index 325
* the magnifying glass icon and the use of a bold typeface in the text indicates that the word/phrase
concerned is included in the glossary with a brief explanation.
vi
Introduction
1
Introduction
by ignoring and misreading my corpus of work, not considering the actual impact
of the work in the many schools near you. . . . I would be happy to have a con-
versation through a rewriting and while I would respect your viewpoint at least a
subsequent article would be a critique of what I said and not what you would want
me to have said.” Whoops, perhaps it was harsh – but Steen rose to the occasion
and invited a more in-depth conversation.
Steen replied that the fundamental questions he was addressing were: “What
is the ontology of the learning effect? Can learning be grasped and understood as
a visible phenomenon? What happens to schools and pupils when the VL evidence
credo/‘package’ is being implemented by international, national, and local political
and educational managers? The first two profound questions are philosophical of
and in nature – the third deals foremost with Bildung concerns, and obvious threats
to freethinking, and the disappearance of autonomous schools.”
Already there are two cultures evident – the world of a philosopher and the
world of an educational psychologist and psychometrician. We had much to learn
about each other’s heritage and language. Steen also sent a wonderful exemplar
of a conversation between the musician Daniel Barenboim and professor of lit-
erature Edward Said (www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWQCy6_TU3A) and sug-
gested we may grow each other’s views via such a conversation. Book versions of
conversations are not uncommon in philosophy but are rarer in education. In Reso-
nance Education, the sociologist Hartmut Rosa talks with the pedagogue Wolfgang
Endres about the basic features of learning that are individualized and sustainable,
and how the idea of ‘resonance’ can be applied to the areas of school and education
(Rosa & Endres 2016). But such conversations do not happen via email, which
soon can move to “I say, no, I said” with little interaction or clarification, and too
often such exchanges harden positions with little listening. It can look harsh too
quickly. Sherry Turkle has written superbly on the flight from conversation into
the world of communication without eye contact, the reaching for the keyboard
not noticing the nuances of facial movements and eye gazes, and how too often
we are now alone together (Turkle 2017). We also note the powerful quote from
Michael Foucault (1984): “Thought is not what inhabits a certain conduct and
gives it its meaning; rather, it is what allows one to step back from this way of act-
ing or reacting, to present it to oneself as an object of thought and question it as
to its meaning, its conditions, its goals. Thought is freedom in relation to what one
does, the motion by which one detaches oneself from it, establishes it as an object,
and reflects on it as a problem.” So, Steen commented that he had “an idea brewing
in his mind”: Why not come together for some weeks to converse?
He outlined some key ideas: Let’s talk about the purpose of education, there are
many more than curious to come to know answers far beyond the Visible Learn-
ing paradigm and results – and most are now in this book. He wrote, “We could
challenge and irritate one another and it is likely that our intellectual exchanges
will force both of us to invent and ventilate self-critical and former unknown
perspectives on education. We could talk about the purpose of education, why
does mankind need education, the legacy of Bildung, autonomy in education, the
2
Introduction
relation between research and politics, the concept of learning, the (in)visibility of
learning, the role of education in society, the future of education, e-learning and
alienation, and so much more.”
We comment about current issues, although note that time can change, govern-
ments and ministers change, and this may need to be considered.
Steen packed his eleven-speed bike (so much thinking happens on the bike),
and flew to Melbourne, where we spent a few weeks in conversation from May to
June 2018. We recorded, then transcribed these conversations, and then worked,
reworked, had more discussions, reordered, explored, and created this book. It was
a labor of much love as both profited from learning the other’s language, ways of
thinking, and – we trust you will also see – different perspectives.
If there was ever an example of thinking aloud, this book aims to capture this
phenomenon.
Let me introduce the conversationalists: Mr. Visible Learning, John Hattie
(b.1950) meets Mr. Bildung, Steen Nepper Larsen (b.1958).
3
5
The encounter
John: Welcome to Melbourne, Steen. You’ll discover, over the next two weeks,
that I’m curious about most things. I know some things reasonably well,
some things hardly at all. I do not claim, like you can, to be an expert in
philosophy. . . . And, as I think I’ve mentioned to you, I had the luxury,
when I was a graduate student at the University of Otago, to sit in classes
on the philosophy of science. We had a brand new professor of philoso-
phy who was a philosophy of science expert. And he was this young guy
from England, Alan Musgrave (Musgrave 1993), and he was a brilliant
teacher and promoted a notion I have loved – theories should make
novel predictions – so that in Visible Learning, the underlying explanation
and theory should make predictions that were not used in the construc-
tion of the theory, but should follow from it. Many of us, including me,
snuck into his classes. During that time, his mentor, the Austrian-born
English philosopher Karl Popper, came on sabbatical to New Zealand.
He was then in his 70s, but wow what a thinker – he was one of those
rare academics who ‘thought aloud’. Have you ever heard Popper speak?
John: The way he lectured, in his very thick, Viennese voice, he read every
word. He never looked up once, and as he read it, we were spellbound.
He had this thing at the time. He hated social science (and smokers), but
he wouldn’t talk about it. “It’s not a science.”
Steen: I know.
John: And so I had to sit there, obviously, as a young 20-year-old social sci-
ence graduate student, spellbound by this man. You can imagine, he had
quite an impact.
He was working on his three worlds paper (Popper 1979). His mes-
sages about making bold claims and then attempting to refute them was
impressed upon us and became important through my career. I have
often cited his claim: “Bold ideas, unjustified anticipations, and specu-
lative thought, are our only means for interpreting nature: our only
organon, our only instrument, for grasping her.” This was, he argued,
because bold ideas propose and predict much, and thus are more easily
refutable. I made some “bold” predictions about the underlying story in
Visible Learning – of course others can refute them, of course they are
conjectures and tentative, of course they aim to explain a lot, make new
predictions, and of course they are open to counter arguments, falsifi-
ability, and I hope they lead to new ways of seeing the world and they
lead to new research. I know there’s a lot of criticism of him and he’s
almost forgotten in many ways now. I don’t know if that’s true, but many
people see him as a figment of history.
6
The encounter
Steen: It depends on where you go. But you are right, his 1953 lecture Conjec-
tures and Refutations (Popper 2002/1953) is still a classic worth consult-
ing if you want to reflect upon how to learn to ask critical questions to
scientific theories and falsify their results.
John: And so, the whole Visible Learning, it’s taken over in a way. I still work
at the measurement area, but not as much now as Visible Learning has
become more dominant.
In fact, I counted it up the other week. For 21 years, I’ve been a dean
or head of school in three universities, and deputy dean at another. As
you know, that just takes the life out of you, but I loved it. In fact, I was
deputy dean here last year for a year, after a 10-year break from these
kinds of duties.
Steen: Okay, but your Visible Learning programs also transformed into a busi-
ness program, I guess. You seem to have been all around the globe,
and many different schools have adopted your way of looking at and
evaluating things. But have you made and handled the data here in
Australia?
7
The encounter
John: Yes and no. What happened is that, when I went back to New Zealand
in 1999 (I’m originally from there but left in 1974), they were in an
interesting stage politically in that one political party said they wanted
national testing like America has, like England has. The other party said,
“No way.” The latter party won government.
And then they said, “Oh, my goodness. We haven’t a clue how we
will now know what is going on in the schools.”
So, they put out a bid for a large amount of money to create a year
five and year seven test in reading and writing, the usual nonsense. I was
quite opposed to this. I think national testing’s a disaster.
We put in a non-compliant bid and we won, and so we built the
New Zealand Assessment Scheme and I want to show it to you as it is
quite a different way of thinking about assessment (Hattie 2006).
And what we’re most proud of, it’s voluntary. No school has to use
it. Eighty percent of schools are using that assessment tool 17 years later.
Very successful.
John: Totally.
Steen: The OECD-invented PISA test system was launched in 2000. The idea
was to compare and hopefully strengthen the pupils’ skills in different
nations, and from the school year 2006 to 2007 Denmark has used a
mandatory national test program.
Steen: The PISA program was implemented via a so-called voluntary coordina-
tion program (see my colleague Krejsler et al. 2014). The different ministers
of education and their staff gathered and coordinated their test programs. It
thereby turned out to be more or less mandatory, and now they’re putting
out the figures for all these countries and for every ‘stakeholder’ to read.
But are you basically critical against all these national competitive
initiatives?
John: Yes, I am, and I want to show you the alternative, as it is key to claim it’s
all about the alternatives.
So, we built this system. In about 2008 we had spent six years build-
ing it, and we were turning from building it and doing the research to
becoming a maintenance-of-a-computer system. I didn’t want to do that.
So, I said to the government, “It’s time for me to hand it back to you
people.” And they were very reluctant to take it in the early days. They
didn’t have the expertise.
8
The encounter
John: New Zealand. I said, “It’s just not appropriate that I’m running a computer-
based company. It’s not my expertise. I don’t want to do it.” They took
it back and did a good job from then on running it. And then I had a
team and I was like, “What do you do with the team?”
Visible Learning had just come out and I said to them, “You’re very
good at translating. That’s your skill. I don’t want to spend my life going
out into schools. I’m not very good at it. I talk too much.” Schools like
when I go and talk but, as I’m sure you know, nothing happens. Next
day, forgotten. It was entertainment.
I said, “I don’t want to do that.”
So I said, “The task I want you to do is I want you to build the
resources around Visible Learning and implement the ideas in schools.”
And you can imagine we didn’t know a lot in those days as to how to
do this. We did it for about six months to a year and it was becoming
very successful in New Zealand.
6:34 p.m. one Saturday night, my dean emailed me without consulta-
tion, out of the blue, and said, “You have to close it. Close it by Monday.
It’s too successful. You’re killing part of the university that’s supposed to
deal with this, as the schools are all coming to you, not them.” And I was
quite distraught, as you can imagine. I was a reasonably senior person in
the place, but no consultation.
In retrospect, it was a very good decision because it allowed me
to seek other, more compatible homes to upscale the translation into
schools. So, various companies came to me and said, “We’ll buy these
people.”
I went to this one place and I was on the board of this company and
they said they’d take it. And I said, “I’ve got these ten people. They’re
out of a job.” They took them.
9
The encounter
impact on student learning, it’s not working. And three companies have
gone because they couldn’t show that.
Last year the base of the commercial operations switched from New
Zealand to a U.S.-based company (Corwin). Also, as I start retirement
from the university, I’m seriously thinking of giving extra days because
I’m quite happy with how they deliver Visible Learning across the world.
I’ve been very happy with what they’ve done and, as I’m sure you know,
it’s not easy as they had to undertake translation, adapt to the local cir-
cumstances, and hire local professional developers. There’s lots of things
to learn from it, but it’s going extremely well as I see from the evidence
on the students.
Like, I’ve seen all the data from the Skanderborg schools in your
country. It’s pretty impressive.
Steen: So, are you working with the Danish professor Lars Qvortrup, the leader
of National Centre for School Research at Aarhus University?
John: Yes.
Steen: In his old days, he was a Marxist, and then favored a system theoretical
approach inspired by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, and now
he is very much in favor of a so-called empirical turn in educational
research, implying that he’s also relying on and producing educational
statistics. That’s quite a big transformation.
John: I know, it’s crazy how we change over our careers. So, as you know, I’m
a statistician and, yes, I never imagined that the Visible Learning book
would ever be of interest. I wrote many versions of it. One version was
over 500 pages. It was resplendent with graphs, numbers galore, it had
every detail you could imagine, all the moderators, you name it.
My wife looked at it, she said, “Who would ever read this?” and
I realized maybe two people would. So I threw it out and she created
those dials to provide some flow. When she looked at the next version
and she said, “Maybe ten will read it now, as there are still too many
numbers.” So I made more revisions to make it less measurement-like
while aiming to retain the evidence in a more interpretative style.
Janet is a professor of evaluation here at the University of Melbourne.
Where are you based – at Aarhus or at Copenhagen?
10
The encounter
11
13
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
minute) and respirations (6 per minute) in connection with a mild
peritonitis, intestinal catarrh, colicy pains and diarrhœa. The
conjunctiva is pale, the pulse compressible, the respirations unequal
and accompanied by a moan, and the appetite impaired or lost.
If confined to mere spots on the liver, a restoration to apparently
vigorous health may take place, but if extensive it may lead to
compression and obstruction of the portal vein or bile duct, or to
compression and atrophy of the liver, with corresponding symptoms.
Treatment. As in other congestions of the liver, the use of salines
to deplete the portal system, and of alkaline diuretics are especially
indicated, to be followed by bitters and mineral acids. Sinapisms and
other counter-irritants to the region of the liver are of great service.
If not complicated with abscess, or microbian infection, cases of this
kind will often do well.
CIRRHOSIS OF THE LIVER. FIBROID
DEGENERATION.