SENSITIVITY OF GRANULAR PILE DIMENSION PARAMETERS TO
DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF SOFT GROUND UNDER BUILDING
LOAD CDB Research College of Design and Built Adamu Beyene , Ruhama Beyene, Hailemariam Merka Day Environment Citation: A. Beyene, R. Beyene and H . Merka (2023). Sensitivity of granular pile dimension parameters to deformation response of soft ground under building load . Applications in Engineering Science 17, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apples.2023.100169
Introduction Methodology Results (Contd.)
• Granular pile (stone column) is one of the Materials used Length • The deformation pattern proven soil improvement mechanisms • Crushed aggregate and variation with depth applied especially for reinforcement of Diameter • Clay soil and lateral offset is similar compressible soils supporting light weight • Sand for all dimension structures. The improvement performance Spacing Methods applied parameters. of granular piles is influenced by various • Numerical (FEM) • Variation in magnitude of factors including the dimension parameters column length has minimal • Site monitoring data (length, spacing and diameter of the piles). effect on settlement (Settlement gauges) Fig. 2. (a, b) Model geometry • The effect of stone column dimension parameters (diameter, spacing Model processes and considerations performance of stone and length) on deformation performance of columns has been widely column reinforced soil mas. documented in many literatures (Znamenskii et al. (2021), Wood et al. • Plaxis 3D model (2000), Magnusson et al. (2015), Nehab et al. (2017), Znamenskii and • Geometry of the model (25m*50m*50m) Fig. 7. Spacing Vs Lat. deformation Sayed (2019), Al-Obaydi1 and Al-Kazzaz (2020), Meshkinghalam et al. • Dimensions of the columns (spacing, diameter and length) were varied with similar %. (2017) , etc). • Hardening Soil (HS) constitutive model However, the existing works on suitability of stone columns in enhancing deformation performances of weak foundation soil are still Simulation limited to the following aspects: Clay without Clay + Stone of initial stone column Superficial investigation of the effect of dimension parameters insitu columns + + Building properties Building on deformation responses. Fig. 3. (a, b,c) Deformed meshes
No comparative analyses have been conducted on the clear
influence of variation in magnitude of the dimension Phase1 Phase2 Phase3 Fig. 11. % improvement in parameters on deformation of the soft foundation soils. Fig. 10. % improvement in vertical Results deformation horizontal deformation None of the previously conducted studies has clearly identified the most influential parameter to which deformation of the Conclusions reinforced ground is most sensitive. • Vertical deformation of the • Vertical deformation (settlement) Aims and Objectives stone column reinforced of the stone column reinforced clay mass is least sensitive clay mass is least sensitive to to length of the columns. length of the columns. Investigating the effect of variation in magnitude of the dimension • In case of lateral displacement, minimal degree of improvement parameters (spacing, diameter & was obtained at the depth where magnitude of deformation is length) maximum which is roughly at one third of the column length. Conducting comparative analysis Fig.4. Diameter Vs deformation. Fig.9. Length Vs deformation. • For all considered • Column diameter is the second between effect of the three dimensions of column, the influential dimension parameter in Objectives dimension parameters on The three parameters (diameter, The magnitude of lateral bulging undergoes visible highest degree of sensitivity affecting both vertical and lateral deformation of the clay mass spacing and length) have no same variation along the was observed for the depths deformation of stone column effect on deformation magnitude. ranging from 6 m to 10 m. reinforced clay ground. The magnitude of deformation is in embedment depth. Identifying the most influential a direct relationship with spacing Maximum lateral bulging was dimension parameter from • Deformation response of the reinforced soil mass entirely along but not with diameter and length of observed at about one third of deformation reduction perspective depth of the embedment is most significant for variation in the stone columns the length from the surface. spacing. Research Day
Prediction of Permeability and Porosity From Well Log Data Using The Nonparametric Regression With Multivariate Analysis and Neural Network, Hassi R'Mel Field, Algeria