Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SENSITIVITY OF GRANULAR PILE DIMENSION PARAMETERS TO

DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF SOFT GROUND UNDER BUILDING


LOAD
CDB
Research
College of
Design and Built Adamu Beyene , Ruhama Beyene, Hailemariam Merka Day
Environment Citation: A. Beyene, R. Beyene and H . Merka (2023). Sensitivity of granular pile dimension parameters to deformation response
of soft ground under building load . Applications in Engineering Science 17, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apples.2023.100169

Introduction Methodology Results (Contd.)


• Granular pile (stone column) is one of the Materials used
Length • The deformation pattern
proven soil improvement mechanisms • Crushed aggregate and variation with depth
applied especially for reinforcement of Diameter • Clay soil and lateral offset is similar
compressible soils supporting light weight • Sand for all dimension
structures. The improvement performance Spacing
Methods applied parameters.
of granular piles is influenced by various
• Numerical (FEM)
• Variation in magnitude of
factors including the dimension parameters column length has minimal
• Site monitoring data
(length, spacing and diameter of the piles). effect on settlement
(Settlement gauges) Fig. 2. (a, b) Model geometry
• The effect of stone column dimension parameters (diameter, spacing Model processes and considerations
performance of stone
and length) on deformation performance of columns has been widely column reinforced soil mas.
documented in many literatures (Znamenskii et al. (2021), Wood et al. • Plaxis 3D model
(2000), Magnusson et al. (2015), Nehab et al. (2017), Znamenskii and • Geometry of the model (25m*50m*50m) Fig. 7. Spacing Vs Lat. deformation
Sayed (2019), Al-Obaydi1 and Al-Kazzaz (2020), Meshkinghalam et al. • Dimensions of the columns (spacing, diameter
and length) were varied with similar %.
(2017) , etc).
• Hardening Soil (HS) constitutive model
 However, the existing works on suitability of stone columns in
enhancing deformation performances of weak foundation soil are still
Simulation
limited to the following aspects: Clay without
Clay + Stone
of initial
stone column
 Superficial investigation of the effect of dimension parameters insitu columns +
+ Building
properties Building
on deformation responses. Fig. 3. (a, b,c) Deformed meshes

 No comparative analyses have been conducted on the clear


influence of variation in magnitude of the dimension Phase1 Phase2 Phase3
Fig. 11. % improvement in
parameters on deformation of the soft foundation soils. Fig. 10. % improvement in vertical
Results deformation
horizontal deformation
 None of the previously conducted studies has clearly identified
the most influential parameter to which deformation of the Conclusions
reinforced ground is most sensitive.
• Vertical deformation of the • Vertical deformation (settlement)
Aims and Objectives stone column reinforced of the stone column reinforced
clay mass is least sensitive clay mass is least sensitive to
to length of the columns. length of the columns.
Investigating the effect of variation in
magnitude of the dimension • In case of lateral displacement, minimal degree of improvement
parameters (spacing, diameter & was obtained at the depth where magnitude of deformation is
length) maximum which is roughly at one third of the column length.
 Conducting comparative analysis Fig.4. Diameter Vs deformation. Fig.9. Length Vs deformation. • For all considered • Column diameter is the second
between effect of the three dimensions of column, the influential dimension parameter in
Objectives
dimension parameters on  The three parameters (diameter,  The magnitude of lateral
bulging undergoes visible
highest degree of sensitivity affecting both vertical and lateral
deformation of the clay mass spacing and length) have no same
variation along the was observed for the depths deformation of stone column
effect on deformation magnitude.
ranging from 6 m to 10 m. reinforced clay ground.
 The magnitude of deformation is in embedment depth.
 Identifying the most influential a direct relationship with spacing  Maximum lateral bulging was
dimension parameter from • Deformation response of the reinforced soil mass entirely along
but not with diameter and length of observed at about one third of
deformation reduction perspective depth of the embedment is most significant for variation in
the stone columns the length from the surface.
spacing.
Research Day

You might also like