Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IV Restriction

Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers in Replicated


Meat-Type Chicken Lines Divergently Selected for
High or Low Early Immune Response

ZEHAVA UNI,1-2 MICHAL GUTMAN,3 GABRIAL LEITNER,1 ESTHER


LANDESMAN,1 DAN HELLER,1 and AVIGDOR CAHANER3
Department of Animal Science and Department of Genetics,
Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Rehovot 76100, Israel
ABSTRACT Information on MHC may improve the efficiency of selection for
immunological traits via the application of marker assisted selection or by
selecting directly for a specific restriction fragment length polymorphism
(RFLP) band or MHC haplotype. An experimental procedure is presented here
for identifying MHC genes that are related to early immune response. A Class
IV cDNA clone was used to probe Southern blots of erythrocyte genomic DNA
from chickens. Chickens were taken from the second (S2) and third (S3)
generations of replicated lines divergently selected for high antibody response
(HC1, HC2) or low antibody response (LCI, LC2) to Escherichia coli vaccination
at 10 days of age. These selection criteria have been found to be associated with
other immunological parameters. The hypothesis that these selected lines differ
in their MHC loci was evaluated by comparing the frequencies of MHC RFLP
markers (single RFLP bands) and haplotypes (patterns of RFLP bands). The
significant differences between LC and HC in the frequency of many MHC
RFLP bands and of five MHC haplotypes indicate that early antibody produc-
tion is influenced by MHC genes. The reliability of the association between the
selection and frequency differences was tested and proven in most cases by
analysis of the replicated lines. These differences in RFLP markers represent a
change in allelic frequencies in MHC genes, probably due to selection. The
results imply a connection between the Class IV genes and early antibody
production, and they show the potential of prospective breeding not only by
immunological phenotype but also by genotype (i.e., using RFLP markers of the
MHC).
(Key words: chicken, restriction fragment length polymorphism, major
histocompatibility complex, Class IV, immune response)
1993 Poultry Science 72:1823-1831

INTRODUCTION order to avoid economic loss. It is clear


that immunocompetence and resistance to
The incidence of disease in commercial many infectious diseases is in part geneti-
chicken flocks is of major economic con- cally determined (Gavora and Spencer,
cern. Vaccines, antibiotics, and other drugs
are being used in the poultry industry in 1983). Consequently, there has been in-
creasing interest, in the identification of
genetic and immunological markers that
could be used in breeding programs to
Received for publication January 4, 1993. improve immunocompetence.
Accepted for publication June 10, 1993. The usefulness and limitations of
iDepartment of Animal Science.
2
To whom correspondence should be addressed. marker-assisted selection (MAS) have
3
Department of Genetics. been discussed by Soller and Backmann
1823
1824 UNI ET AL.

(1986) and Smith and Simpson (1986). The Different B-G haplotypes have been num-
more markers identified and the closer bered from Ba to Bn (Briles and Briles,
they are to quantitative trait loci, the more 1982) and used for genetic studies. Most of
efficient MAS is likely to be. When a those studies have been conducted in
certain marker or group of markers is White Leghorn (WL) populations, using
associated with a quantitative trait that is serological tools for B-G haplotype iden-
important to the breeder, MAS is more tification. Several studies have demon-
advantageous than conventional selection. strated the association between the MHC
Developments in molecular biology and oncogenic diseases (Bacon et al, 1981)
techniques have enabled more efficient or bacterial disease challenge survival
evaluation of potential markers in the (Lamont et al, 1987). Nordskog (1983) and
genome. In some species of farm animals, Pevzner et al. (1975) reported different
strong evidence has been found for the levels of antibodies in different B haplo-
linkage between restriction fragment types. Based on all of the above, the MHC
length polymorphism (RFLP) and prolac- region is a natural candidate for MAS,
tin (Cowan et al, 1989), production traits especially for immunological traits.
(Jung et al, 1989), and disease resistance In the present study, cDNA clone bg
(Lunden et al, 1990). However, in chick-
ens, polymorphisms identified by the use 32.1 (Miller et al, 1988) was used to probe
of DNA technology and associations be- Southern blots of erythrocyte genomic
tween RFLP markers and quantitative DNA from chickens. The examined chick-
traits have hardly been described. High ens were taken from the second (S2) and
polymorphism of RFLP markers was re- third (S3) generations of replicated lines
vealed in the MHC Class IV (B-G) region divergently selected for high antibody
following digestion of DNA from layer response (HC1, HC2) or low antibody
chickens (Miller et al, 1988) and meat-type response (LCI, LC2) to Escherichia coli
chickens (Uni et al, 1992). These RFLP are vaccination at 10 days of age (Leitner et al,
potential markers for MHC genes. 1992). These selection criteria have been
The MHC genes play an important role found to be associated with other im-
in immune system functions (reviewed by munological parameters, such as antibody
Bacon, 1987). In chickens, the MHC (B response to Newcastle disease virus
complex) is located on an 8 million bp (NDV) inactivated vaccine, SRBC, in-
microchromosome, of which 6 million bp creased phagocytic activity, and prolifera-
code for ribosomal RNA in the nuclear tive response to antigens or mitogens
organizer (Bloom and Bacon, 1985). The (Pitcovski et al, 1987; Heller et al, 1992).
MHC contains tightly linked genes B-L, B- The selection therefore most probably
V, and B-G (Hala et al, 1988; Kaufman et affects a general component of early
al, 1989) that code, respectively, for Class immiinocompetence, possibly by changing
I, Class II, and Class IV glycoproteins on allelic frequencies in MHC genes. The
the cell surface. The B-F and B-L antigens hypothesis that these selected lines differ
are similar to their mammalian homo- in their MHC loci was evaluated by
logues in structure, function, and tissue comparing the frequencies of MHC RFLP
distribution (Guillemont and Auffray, markers (single RFLP bands) and haplo-
1989). The B-G antigen, however, is unique types (patterns of RFLP bands).
to avian species and was originally
described as limited to erythrocytes and
their precursor cells (Pink et al, 1977). MATERIALS AND METHODS
Recent publications, however (Miller et al,
1990; Salomonsen et al, 1991a) have Birds
shown that members of this superfamily
of immunoglobulins are also found on The analysis included 102 chickens from
thrombocytes, lymphocytes, and certain the S2 generation and 102 chickens from the
epithelial cells in the bursa of Fabricius, S3 generation of Lines HC1, HC2, LCI, or
thymus, and intestine. LC2. The immunological parameters of
The grouping of these genes on one these selection lines are presented in Heller
chromosome is termed a B-haplotype. et al. (1992).
CLASS IV MARKERS AND CHICKEN IMMUNE RESPONSE 1825
Restriction Fragment Length verify the consistency of the selection effect
Polymorphism of Class IV Major in those replicated lines.
Histocompatibility Complex
The DNA was extracted from samples of RESULTS
heparinized whole blood collected from
each chicken (Hillel et d., 1989). Genomic Frequencies of Restriction Fragment
DNA (10 /xg) was digested with the restric- Length Polymorphism of Class IV
tion endonucleases Pvull (83 chickens from Major Histocompatibility Complex
S2 generation and 100 chickens from S3
generation) or Bglll (102 chickens from S2 Digestion of DNA with Restriction
generation and 100 chickens from S3 genera- Enzyme Pvull. An RFLP analysis following
tion) prior to electrophoresis on a 1% digestion with the restriction enzyme Pvull
agarose gel. The DNA was transferred to revealed high levels of polymorphism and
nylon filters according to the method of complexity at the Class IV region. A total of
Southern (1975), hybridized (Hillel et ah, 31 polymorphic bands (1.6 to 8.0 kb) were
1989) with the 32P-labeled chicken Class IV observed in 183 chickens, taken at random
cDNA probe bg 32.1 (Miller et al., 1988), and from S2 and S3 generation birds of lines LCI,
subjected to autoradiography. LC2, HC1, and HC2. Twelve of these RFLP
bands were analyzed statistically.
Statistical Analysis In S2, five RFLP bands (P2, P4, P6, P24,
P25) had significantly different frequencies
Differences of band and haplotype fre- in the HC versus LC lines (Table 1). In S3, six
quencies between the pooled, divergently RFLP bands (P3, P4, P22, P23, P24, P25)
selected lines (LC and HC) were analyzed were found to have significantly different
by chi-square test using PROC FREQUEN- frequencies in the divergent lines (Table 2).
CIES (SAS Institute, 1987). In those cases in For Band P22, the significant difference
which LC differed significantly from HC, between HC1 and HC2, and the similarity
the differences between replicated lines between HC2 and LCI, suggests that the
were also analyzed by chi-square test to difference between pooled LC and HC was

TABLE 1. Frequency of 12 RFLP1 bands obtained using restriction enzyme PPWII


in the second generation of chicken lines selected for high (HC) or low (LC)
antibody response to Escherichia coli

Replicated lines Pooled lines


RFLP band 2 LCI LC2 HC1 HC2 LC HC P(X2)
(30)3 (30) (48) (58) (60) (106)
(kb) C°'1
(—)
8.0 PI 23 16 14 12 20 13 NS
7.5 P2 26 20 4 12 23 9 .004
5.2 P3 0 0 8 3 0 6 .056
4.7 P4 16 20 2 4 16 2 <.0001
4.5 P5 100 94 100 90 97 94 NS
4.3 P6 47 37 33 28 41 27 .020
2.3 P20 33 13 23 24 23 24 NS
2.0 P21 20 33 12 20 27 17 .085
1.9 P22 18 13 23 24 27 23 .067
1.8 P23 16 10 16 5 13 10 NS
1.7 P24 17 27 12 4 22 7 .004
1.6 P25 13 16 0 7 15 2 .001
Restriction fragment length polymorphism.
2P1... P25 designate the different RFLP bands.
32n.
1826 UNI ET AL.

TABLE 2. Frequency of 12 RFLP1 bands obtained using restriction enzyme PPMII


in the third generation of chicken lines selected for high (HC) or low (LC)
antibody response to Escherichia coli

Replicated lines Pooled lines


RFLP band 2 LCI LC2 HCl HC2 LC HC P(x2)
(52)3 (58) (32) (58) (110) (90)
(kb) (°/,^
8.0 PI 19 14 22 13 16 17 NS
7.5 P2 26 12 6 20 14 16 NS
5.2 P3 4 2 9 22 3 18 <.0001
4.7 P4 15 12 0 5 14 4 .008
4.5 P5 100 82 100 86 89 91 NS
4.3 P6 37 44 25 38 40 33 .082
2.3 P20 27 7 25 33 17 33 NS
2.0 P21 30 37 50 36 34 41 NS
1.9 P22 19 10 37* 19 14 25 .025
1.8 P23 2 7 13 19 4 17 .003
1.7 P24 21* 36 9* 0 29 3 <.0001
1.6 P25 13 7 0 0 20 0 .001

'Restriction fragment length polymorphism.


2
P 1 . . . P25 designate the different RFLP bands.
32n.
'Indicates a significant difference (P < .05) between a pair of replicated lines.

random and not due to selection. Although and HC in RFLP Band B20 could be random
the replicated lines differed significantly in and not due to selection. In S3 generation
the frequency of Band F24, its frequency in birds, the frequency of these RFLP bands
LCI and LC2 was much higher than that in and of another band (B25) were found to be
HCl and HC2 (Table 2). significantly different in the divergent lines
Digestion of DNA with Restriction (Table 4).
Enzyme BgMI. The use of a second six-
cutter restriction enzyme revealed a similar Frequencies of Major
degree of polymorphism and complexity at Histocompatibility Complex Class IV
the Class IV region. A total of 25 poly- Restriction Fragment Length
morphic bands (2.0 to 9.5 kb) were observed Polymorphism Haplotypes
in an experimental population of 202 chick-
ens taken at random from the S2 and S3 Haplotypes were determined according
generations of the replicated divergent to their "restriction pattern" and by family
lines. Seven of the 25 RFLP bands were group analysis, as described by Uni et al.
analyzed statistically. In S2, four RFLP (1992) and Landesman et al. (1993). A total
bands (B19, B20, B21, and B24) had signifi- of 14 different haplotypes (A, C, D, E, F, G,
cantly different frequencies in LC and HC H, K, L, R, T, U, V, and X) were identified
birds (Table 3). For Band B19, the significant and designated by letters in 102 chickens
difference between HCl and HC2, and the from the replicated divergent lines (LCI,
similarity between HCl, LCI, and LC2 LC2; HCl, HC2) of S3 generation birds.
suggest that the difference between pooled Among the chickens examined, a large
variety of B-G haplotypes in all kinds of
LC and HC was random and not due to combinations was found. Only 14% of the
selection. Although the HC replicated lines chickens were homozygous. Figure 1 ex-
differed significantly in Band B20, its fre- hibits a representative Southern blot depict-
quency in LCI and LC2 was much higher ing the RFLP pattern of 19 chickens from
than that in HCl and HC2. Statistical two selection lines (LCI; HCl), after diges-
analysis of pairs of replicated lines showed tion with Pvull (Figure la) or BglU (Figure
that the difference between the pooled LC lb) and hybridization with Class IV probe
CLASS IV MARKERS AND CHICKEN IMMUNE RESPONSE 1827
TABLE 3. Frequency of seven RFLP1 bands obtained using restriction enzyme BglU
in the second generation of chicken lines selected for high (HC) or low (LC)
antibody response to Escherichia coli

Replicated lines Pooled lines


RFLP band* LCI LC2 HC1 HC2 LC HC P(x2)
(52)3 (52) (42) (58) (104) (100)
(kb) (°',\
2.9 B18 40 24 43 21 33 30 NS
2.8 B19 24 24 24* 7 24 14 .037
2.5 B20 25 17 8* 0 21 4 .004
2.4 B21 42 35 48 44 39 46 .012
2.2 B23 0 7 4 5 4 5 NS
2.1 B24 6 7 30 35 7 32 <.O01
2.0 B25 26 24 31 20 25 25 NS
Restriction fragment length polymorphism.
2
B18...B25 designate the different RFLP bands.
32n.
'Indicates a significant difference (P < .05) between a pair of replicated lines.

bg 32.1. This figure also demonstrates the haplotypes of the MHC region were fol-
designation of the B-G haplotypes and some lowed by evaluation of their frequencies
of the restriction fragment bands that were within the selection lines. Only haplotypes
analyzed statistically. Among the seven that were found in at least 8 birds out of the
chickens from the LC line, five chickens 102 examined chickens were analyzed
were carrying Haplotype K in different statistically. Several haplotypes (A, C, F, K,
combinations (with Haplotype R, A, or G). U, and X) appeared only or mainly among
Among the 12 chickens from the HC line, either LC or HC birds (Table 5). With the
six were carrying Haplotype D in different exception of Haplotype K (statistical analy-
combinations (with Haplotype V or R). Of sis between pairs of replicated lines showed
these 19 chickens, 5 were homozygous. The that the difference between the pooled LC
interpretation of these RFLP patterns as and HC could be random and not due to the

TABLE 4. Frequency of seven RFLP1 bands obtained using restriction enzyme BglU
in the third generation of chicken lines selected for high (HC) or low (LC)
antibody response to Escherichia coli

Replicated lines Pooled lines


RFLP band* LCI LC2 HC1 HC2 LC HC P(x2)
(54)3 (58) (32) (56) (112) (88)
(kb) (o/\

2.9 B18 43 25 38 44 34 42 .074


2.8 B19 22 30 11 7 23 8 <.001
2.5 B20 7 18 4 0 13 1 <.001
2.4 B21 33 26 37 50 29 47 <.001
2.2 B23 6 6 6 3 6 4 NS
2.1 B24 9 7 40 38 8 38 <.O01
2.0 B25 22 31 15 16 26 16 .046
Restriction fragment length polymorphism.
2
B18 . . . B25 designate the different RFLP bands.
32n.
1828 UNI ET AL.

LC HC

Kt 1 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

5.1-

4.2-

3.5-

2-
Ml U p . ,

KR AK AC KK KG KG DO DV DV XV CC DD GX UG VX TU DD DR
1
LC HC
1 2 3 4 5 6 V •8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

!liifflt*S|
6

4-

• . B ir • - W ^ ^ 5 •
820 B21
2.3-
• • - i " f I - £ •
W — # •B24 # • w w

KR AK AC KK KG KG DD DV DV XV CC DD GX UG VX TU OD DR
FIGURE 1. A representative Southern blot depicting the restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns
obtained following digestion with PvuU (a) and BglTl (b) of genomic DNA (from chicken lines selected to high
(HC) or low (LC) antibody response to Escherichia coli (LC = 7 and HC = 12 chickens) and hybridization with Class
IV probe bg 32.1. Restriction fragment sizes were estimated on the basis of Hmdm-digested 5-phage DNA
fragments. Some RFLP fragments are marked. P2, P3, P17, P20, P24, P25 on Figure la and B19, B20, B21, B24, B25
on Figure lb are Class rv RFLP fragment numbers (P for PuuII and B for Bg/II). Class IV Haplotype designation is
indicated at the bottom of each lane.
CLASS IV MARKERS AND CHICKEN IMMUNE RESPONSE 1829
TABLE 5. Frequency of B-G haplotypes in the chicken lines selected for high (HC) or low
(LC) antibody response to Escherichia coli

Replicated lines Pooled lines


Haplotypes LCI LC2 HCl HC2 LC HC P(x2)
(54)1 (58) (34) (58) (112) (92)

\'u)
A 16 7 0 2 11 1 .005
C 12 15 0 0 13 0 <.001
D 30 18 6 28 24 20 NS
E 16 15 20 8 15 12 NS
F 6 0 10 14 3 12 .025
G 8 9 16 18 8 17 NS
K 12* 30 10* 0 21 4 <.001
R 0 7 23 4 4 11 NS
U 0 0 6 14 0 11 <.001
X 0 0 6 12 0 9 .005
Ln titer 2 .9 1.3 3.5 3.8 1.2 3.6
i2n.
2
Line means of antibody response to E. coli vaccination at 10 days of age.
'Indicates a significant difference (P < .05) between a pair of replicated lines.

selection), all those haplotypes were signifi- Miller et al. (1991) recently explained
cantly different in their frequency in the the nature of the high degree of polymor-
selection lines. phism in B-G antigens. They found that
the B-G polypeptides are composed of
single extracellular domains and single
DISCUSSION membrane-spanning domains (all of them
The field of molecular biology has with sequence diversity) and long
provided new tools and approaches to cytoplasmic tails, which are made up
animal breeding, including identification entirely of differing numbers of units, each
of genes influencing quantitative traits. An consisting of seven amino acid residues
important condition for finding a marker (heptads), which may themselves vary in
for a given trait is to use a probe that sequence. The large number of RFLP
reveals a high level of polymorphism in bands obtained in the current study agrees
the gene region examined. The bg 32.1 with their findings. Moreover, A PvuU
probe, which binds to the B-G genes, restriction site was located in the sequence
reveals a very high degree of polymor- of multiple short (42 bp) repeats that had
been reported by Kaufman et al. (1989).
phism (Miller et al, 1988; Uni et al, 1992) These repeats have been suggested to
and is therefore a suitable marker. have a function in the size heterogeneity
Based on serological and biochemical of B-G molecules, due to variation of their
information, B-G genes appear to exist cytoplasmic tail length.
within a subregion that is physically The most polymorphic genes known in
separated from B-F/B-L genes (Briles and eukaryotic organisms are associated with
Briles, 1982; Miller et al, 1988). However, the immune system functions of antigen
Kaufman et al (1989) raised the question presentation and recognition. The findings
of whether all B-G genes are separated of Miller et al. (1991) revealed that the B-G
from all B-F/B-L genes. His evidence genes are similar to immunoglobulin,
indicates that some B-G genes are located having extracellular domains with varia-
within the B-F/B-L subregion. His model ble sequences. Examination of the immune
introduced the possibility that RFLP frag- function of B-G antigens (Salomonsen et
ments include Class I or Class II and Class al, 1991b) showed an "adjuvant effect" of
IV genes and can therefore be identified chicken MHC polymorphic B-G antigens
by a Class IV probe. ' and suggested rules for the polymorphic
1830 UNI ET AL.

B-G molecules, particularly for the genera- munological phenotype but also by geno-
tion of B cell diversity, in the immune type (i.e., using RFLP markers of the
systems of birds. The recent information MHC).
about the function of B-G antigens empha-
sizes the potential usefulness of B-G RFLP ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
markers in selection for improved im-
munocompetency. The authors thank M. M. Miller (Beck-
The significant differences between LC man Research Institute, Duarte, CA 91010)
and HC in the frequency of many MHC for the bg 32.1 probe and J. Pitcovski
RFLP bands and of five MHC haplotypes (Megal Technology Center, Kiriat-Shmona,
indicate that early antibody production is Israel) for his contribution. This work was
influenced by MHC genes. The reliability funded by Bundesministerium fur For-
of the association between the selection schung und Technologie, Germany; Minis-
and frequency differences was tested and try of Science and Technology, Israel; and
proven in most cases by analysis of the Joint German Israel Research Projects.
replicated lines. These differences in RFLP
markers represent a change in allelic
frequencies in MHC genes, probably due REFERENCES
to tie selection. The increase in frequency Bacon, L. D., 1987. Influence of the major histocom-
differences between LC and HC from S2 to patibility complex on disease resistance and
S3 observed for most RFLP bands provides productivity. Poultry Sci. 66:802-811.
an additional indication of the association Bacon, L. D., R. L. Witter, L. B. Crittenden, A. Fadly,
and J. Motta, 1981. B-haplotype influence on
between the selection and the change in Marek's disease, Rous sarcoma and lymphoid
band frequencies. leukosis virus-induced tumors in chickens.
Information on MHC may improve the Poultry Sci. 60:132-139.
Bloom, S. E., and L. D. Bacon, 1985. Linkage of the
efficiency of selection for immunological major histocompatibility complex and the
traits, via the application of MAS or by nucleolar organizer in the chicken. J. Hered. 76:
selecting directly for a specific RFLP band 146-154.
or MHC haplotype. The use of two Briles, W. E., and R. W. Briles, 1982. Identification of
restriction enzymes increased the number haplotypes of the chicken major histocompati-
bility complex (B). Immunogenetics 15:449-459.
of RFLP markers, improved the definition Cowan, C. M., M R. Dentine, R. L. Ax, and L. A.
of MHC haplotypes (unpublished data), Schuler, 1989. Restricted fragment length poly-
and increased the chances of identifying morphism associated with growth hormone and
an association with immune traits. If a prolactin genes in Holstein bulls: evidence for a
certain fragment or group of fragments novel growth hormone allele. Anim. Genet. 20:
157-165.
(i.e., a haplotype) were to be associated Gavora, J. S., and J. L. Spencer, 1983. Breeding for
with a trait and if its effect were to be genetic resistance: specific or general. World's
large enough, MAS would be more advan- Poult. Sci. J. 43:137-148.
tageous than conventional selection. Guillemont, F., and C. Auffray, 1989. Molecular
biology of the chicken major histocompatibility
Analyses of the duplicated selection complex. Crit. Rev. Poult. Biol. 2:255-275.
lines, which differ significantly in several Hala, K., A.-M. Chausse, O. Bourlet, O. Lassila, V.
immunological parameters at young age Hasler, and C. Auffray, 1988. Attempt to detect
(Heller et ah, 1992), enabled us to compare recombination between B-F and B-L genes
within the chicken B complex by serological
the frequencies of RFLP markers. For the typing, in vitro MLR and RFLP analyses.
first time in meat-type chickens, a signifi- Immunogenetics 28:433-438.
cant association between frequency of Heller, E. D., G. Leitner, A. Friedman, Z. Uni, M.
Class r / MHC RFLP markers and immune Gutman, and A. Cahaner, 1992. Immunological
response was found. Differences between characteristics of meat-type chicken lines diver-
gently selected by antibody response to Es-
LC and HC lines suggest some linkage cherichia coli vaccination at 10 days of age. Vet.
between the RFLP markers and the im- Immunol. Immunopathol. 34:159-172.
mune characteristics of the lines. The Hillel, J., Y. Plozky, A. Haberfeld, U. Lavi, A.
results imply a connection between the Cahaner, and A. J. Jeffreys, 1989. DNA finger-
Class IV genes and early antibody produc- prints of poultry. Anim. Genet. 20:25-35.
tion, and they show the potential of Jung, Y. C, M. F. Rothschild, M. P. Flanagan, L. L.
Christian, and C. M. Warner, 1989. Association
prospective breeding not only by im- of RFLP of swine leucocyte antigen class I genes
CLASS IV MARKERS AND CHICKEN IMMUNE RESPONSE 1831
with production traits of Duroc and Hampshire Nordskog, A. W., 1983. Immunogenetics as an aid to
boars. Anim. Genet. 20:79-91. selection for disease resistance in the fowl.
Kaufman, J., J. Salomonsen, and K. Skjodt, 1989. B-G World's Poult. Sci. J. 39:199-209.
cDNA clones have multiple small repeats and Pevzner, I., A. W. Nordskog, and M. L. Kaeberle,
hybridize to both chicken MHC regions. Im- 1975. Immune response and the B blood group
munogenetics 30:440-451. locus in chickens. Genetics 80:753-759.
Lamont, S. J., C. Bohn, and N. Cheville, 1987. Genetic Pink, J.R.L., W. Droege, K. Hala, V. C. Miggiano, and
resistance to fowl cholera is linked to the major A. Ziegler, 1977. A three-locus model for the
histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 25: chicken major histocompatibility complex. Im-
284-289. munogenetics 5:203-216.
Landesman, E., Z. Uni, and E. D. Heller, 1993. Pitcovski, J., E. D. Heller, A. Cahaner, and B. A.
Classification of Major Histocompatibility Com- Peleg, 1987. Selection for early responsiveness of
plex class IV haplotypes by RFLP, in meat-type chickens to Escherichia coli and Newcastle dis-
chickens. Anim. Genet, (in press). ease virus. Poultry Sci. 66:1276-1282.
Leitner, G., Z. Uni, A. Cahaner, and E. D. Heller, Salomonsen, J., D. Dunon, K. Skjodt, D. Thorpe, O.
1992. Replicated divergent selection of meat- Vainio, and J. Kaufman, 1991a. Chicken major
type chickens for high or low early antibody histocompatibility complex-encoded B-G anti-
response to E. coli vaccination. Poultry Sci. 71: gens are found on many cell types that are
27-37. important for the immune system. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 88:1359-1363.
Lunden, A., S. Sigurdardottir, I. Edfors-Lilja, B.
Danell, J. Redel, and L. Andersson, 1990. The Salomonsen, J., H. Eriksson, K. Skjodt, T. Lundgreen,
effect of bovine major histocompatibility com- M. Simonsen, and J. Kaufman, 1991b. The
plex on bull breeding values for clinical mastitis "adjuvant effect" of the polymorphic B-G anti-
gens of the chicken major histocompatibility
and somatic cell counts in milk. Pages 497-500 complex analyzed using purified molecules
in: Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on incorporated in liposomes. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:
Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. XVI, 649-658.
Edinburgh, UK, July 23-27.
SAS Institute, 1987. SAS/STAT® Guide for Personal
Miller, M. M., H. Abplanalp, and R. Goto, 1988. Computers. 6th Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary,
Genotyping chickens for the B-G subregion of NC.
the major histocompatibility complex. Im- Smith, C, and S. P. Simpson, 1986. The use of genetic
munogenetics 28:374-379. polymorphism in livestock improvement. J.
Miller, M. M., R. Goto, S. Young, J. Chirivella, D. Anim. Breed. Gen. 103:205-217.
Hawke, and C. C. Miyada, 1991. Immunoglobu- Soller, M., and J. S. Backmann, 1986. Restriction
lin variable-region-like domains of diverse se- fragment length polymorphism in poultry
quence within the major histocompatibility breeding. Poultry Sci. 65:1474-1488.
complex of chicken. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Southern, E., 1975. Detection of specific sequences
88:4377-4381. among DNA fragments separated by gel elec-
Miller, M. M., R. Goto, S. Young, J. Liu, and J. Hardy, trophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503-517.
1990. Antigens similar to major histocompatibil- Uni, Z., J. Hillel, R. Vaiman, A. Cahaner, and E. D.
ity complex B-G are expressed in the intestinal Heller, 1992. Restriction fragment length poly-
epithelium in the chicken. Immunogenetics 32: morphism of MHC class-rV (B-G) genotypes in
45-50. meat-type chickens. Anim. Genet. 23:319-324.

You might also like