Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Turnback_Capacity_Assessment_at_Rail_Transit_Stub-end_Terminal_with_Multi_Tracks (1)
Turnback_Capacity_Assessment_at_Rail_Transit_Stub-end_Terminal_with_Multi_Tracks (1)
1329
---
ffi~ ,Jl ~~~~~ttw~•at~•~~§~e{; ••~~•
---
~.*~~~ttm~mn~~~~~~-A~#r
1. 2 i$JLt!MfB]
:Ji::,jtfj:c 1[~Sti'8J
t±J ~~{1;/Jlt ['a)
P3
b @ rill:Ji!irllft~ffifF1:.i¥JWi>'r~1~Sti'aJ
~ 2 t±l~~1~R1faJ~JtnliiJ($f:fl:s)
Fig. 2 Influence of departure waiting time(Unit: s)
1330 ~ 45~
TJliJ
f24+t46=t13+t35
IE 3 IU~;l:$JfjttX'lfilr~~JJIY-J~nioJ(~ffz::s)
Fig. 3 Influence of turn-back capacity under the homogeneity of arrival or departure interval (Unit: s)
2. 1 lltmi tlf iJH1 l.¥ 1Hlf ~Jtl:$:~:fi-;f;J.IJ!U C't!n:tt19!Ufi$) fnil!ft:$ flu (tjc
~$t1:$M~~~ttffl~mk¾~:$:~ffl:$:M ~i&tnmi&t
JE1tl$~:fi-:nrPJ) ~~n[riJ ,1tl$12Ml~!f!Lmffi%~2z ~1PJ!f!
*~atrsJJt;fp" ttffl' ~T TORNQUIST ,f!1 PERSSON t'tt±:l ~
Lm~~$~:fi-:1frPJW~t1::m7Jl.!q:i~-~JE, i!149"Mil!m; #,f!
N-Track :m7Jl.!C9 J, ~:$:Jri'J::frj;J* -=f1-IR~ ,~1-IR~EE*-
J:nrPJ~fflPJ~~~jgi!l5~~~ 11] :t ~ ~;j:}J.
=f1k!f!Lil) tllnx:, ~ 4 ~ yi'JfrJ~~yi'Jjgf7tl Cl!! 4), Pf ~~:
$:Jri'J::frjg 41-IR ~,Jt:q:iIR~ 1 ~ 21k!f!Lil!CA ,f!1 B), IR~ 2 ~
31k !f!Lil!(CE fn D), IR~ 3 ~ 2 1kti:Jtm (F ,f!1 G), IR~ 4 ~
S2 S3 S4
41k!f!Lil!CH,I, J ,f!1 K).
1331
*
0 60 120
2 ~lt:iE'.><.
4K
Tab. 2 Parameters
4D
41
nru :wHi'tYU
4H ~
not $1Sc ~-YU$¥14tt1:1Sc§ le
3G '
K 't'a<J~-~¥14J¥YU%,-tm00 6,llP-JJ fe=l K 't'a<J• E-
J.I.
3F
2E
I ~¥14J¥YU%.!m00 6,llP-JJ l,=nnTU l, d;n,j,, g-lfi[ j a<J!t'!Lil!
~
~
1B
there
I l"J@frHta<J•;NeJIWiHtlaJ ~-:<J14a< J:lf:!$H,f['B] irbegin,k ¥14 k
tb a<Jif:ll;U:lf*f'tHtlaJ
~
s g-lfi[ffi%; ST
g['Bj!t'fL:i]!g-!fitffi%,OO 4 't' ST=4 Sp :fJ!
l1i:IIi1ii,!t'JL:i]!a{Jg-lfi[ffi %, 00 4 't' Sp=4 SD :fJ!
l1i~:lfil!ft-a<Jg-!fitffi%,OO 4 't' SD=3 Sc :fJ!l1i-'F3'.t3'. Min(xend,le - Xbegin,j~) (L)
tJU)1'~a{Jg-!fitffi%, 00 4 't' Sc=3 Sw :JIU$:fJ!
2, 2, 3 f"J3R~{4 r"}}
l1i$~~1:/¥Hti'eJ~W:1¥/a{Jg-! fitffi%
R-: Bti'§Jf"JJR * C1)
¥14(Event,}ilJ$ r:1i" ffl!t'JL:ita<J:l:t~) tt1:ZXJ¥ffi% K=
[ Ci,j,in/out) ,iEU,jES] * jf,3iJJ$ ; :f=Eg-! ffl--{4 ~ ftft.14 ~it•~ *ftft Bt laJ if§ -3&, ~
fit J a<J:g;11':1f1"J .1t<mmI 6, YU$ 1 a<J K ¥ 14~i':rllP-JJ: K=
K
[Cl,1,in), Cl,2,in). Cl,3,in), (1,4,in), ( 1, 4, out), (1,3,out),
(1,2,out), Cl, l ,out) J . . YU$ i :f=Eg-lfi[j =
Xbegin,fe tb (2)
=EK't'~~$~-~:<J#J¥~%a<J1iff~i':r :f=EK't'~~$•E-
•{tt:~~*BtlaJ&,®f *r$--{4~£J !i3RBtlaJ .~ i E U, i < ( 5)
~¥#J¥~%a<J1iff ~ir
1332 ~ 45~
qk,z = qk-H,zH k
+
XenJ,k = Xbegin,k bk,jdin,j,t + O - bk,)dout,j," E Kout,i,j ,i E U,j E So,k < nnw 08) = l,2
kEK,j(/.Sw,tEPj (7) z
~$1Lil!,~ m = 2.3
qk,2 = qk--1,2
k EK ,k ,s; n(nTU - 4), (26)
k E Kn,i,j ,i E U,j E So,k < nnw 05)
k E Kout,i,j,i E U,j E Sp,k<nnw 06) iiE 4lf £Ji fl vF t~Bi at i'§J i¥J :hlJ ~ti:. llP ~ iiEffi 1
qk,y = qk-t-1,2
i¥JBti'sJ *ffit!'I~ , IJ!tl
k E Kout,i,j ,i E U,j E Sp,k < nnw 07) = 3.4 Xend,k--t4n - Xbegin,k--+-4n == Xend,k - Xbegin,k
1333
JU *~ 1±1 ~ at laJ laJ IWi if!'!~ ' -flllil ~ ~ r £"33R, IJ!U ft~Jll.~Uffi7Ji.!~3Jt-.IJ!.*1T3Jt •. ILOG CPLEX Pf ~;J£{:#;ffe.
i E U,i<nrn-1 (28)
Xend,Ji-t-2 - XenJ,ji-tl i
= Xend,ji - tl 3Jt - .I Jl. CTTC ( calculation tool for turnback capacity),
E U,i<nrn-1 2. 2. 4 tfijgjf. (29) it.IJ!.:ii:i:ff_[ 141$ift/1 ffl ILOG CPLEX 3t * 11..rl'.: 1:it 1t:ff ~ JJIL
J&m*fitfijg, -tin + = 1 k E Ks,j ,j E Sp k•ti:Jtili3'.t:im 16 %~, ::!~®:itJB~ir~, 1¥i (31) ~-1k$JH~, ~-K 58.
qk,l ~:121m
qk,2 r + J filtm*1'f tfijg, -tin = 1 k 96 km, jl:il, t$ir~ 13 ~- •1k fi';)lj}:~~ 16 %~~-1-£~,i~tfijgj}:~, ~ IIT[~j}:~frrtfijg
Ks,j ,j E Sp
qk,3 qk,4
X12K
G61K
--r1r*li1S' I ~99K
B
~
X04K
G05K
G08K
•
X97K
G62K
•
X93K
B 3 30 2 H.J. 2
3 H+HJ+K 4
VS 10 30
4 H+HJ+K 4
D 12 12 60 30
E 10 30 3. 2 ~;iBHJr ~-
F 3 3 60 30
~k:1f.,Pf~l±l~l!l8~7f-~~[P]m¾
G 3 3 60 30
tfijgffi.rl'.;r CxtIBL7f~ l ,2,3A) ~f'l~htitW:. 3. 2. , ~lr-
3. 1 JJ"~~it utfi;gfJ.ri'.:r~f'l~h%m JAi!! 8
tmJEtfijg~ffi.rl'.:r ,Jtl$tfi;g:ct~•-, tfijgf'I~ q=iPf~l±l ,:f:Eif!'IIP]~ir~atrsJ~14r .~IP] tfijg ffi.rl'.:r ~ tfijg
h*$~tt•1±1**~MJEm~%m~ ~:hlJ•2z rsJ IWi at rsJ ~~*~:ff = O) iU~:hlJfir·t::txttfi;gf'l~h
~:hlJfir~#r~~~tJr3g~m1t~m~#r~•* tfi;gf'l~h ,jl:i&tttY 41-:n.,JJl* ~~ufriJ~*- :f:E~~ tJrjgffi.ri'.:r, ~~ir~atrsJ1J\r 140
5. sat, :hl1fir~14r
Machine Translated by Google
1334 ~ 45~
K
B'-J~~jJ 1J\r ~:MJ&1k{4r B'-J~~jJ, mf *r 140s at,
J 140 295 450
jj;J;Jfift1k{4 r 8"J ~~jJ :H:flrtJ. tE Im ~ tlr:ilMlA r , ~if§ lpJ I 105 260 415
H
B'-J~Jt:$, {!3.11$cW,{i[~ 370 s. ffi;G l. 51 143 206 361 453
~D 48 463
203 358
168 323
1d5~s 91 31 31¾3346
40 80 120 160 200 240 280 220 360 400 440 480 Fig. 9 Track occupation under the disproportion of arrival
-WMBti'aJ/s or departure interval ( corresponding to
~s ~~m•m~~~~•MH~•#~~m•~~
Fig. 8-B) (Unit: s)
1335
K ....-------.304....-------- , 1,292
t'fL:it'.l(::i!l, 2012(5) , 64. MIAO Qin, ZHOU Tianxing. Analysis of turning-back capacity at
LIU Xun. Study on design of matching turn-back ability in urban rail urban rail transit station[]]. Urban Mass Transit, 2010, 13 (11), 57.
transit[J]. Modern Urban Transit, 2012(5) :64.
[ 2] JIANG Z, TAN Y, WANG F, et al. Turnback capacity assessment and [13] :lfts1J,'.l'li, ~IUL liU'i. !t!!.~YU$ti!imftfr:ig3):',($i;nl"Jffil~3t
delay management at a rail transit terminal with two-tail tracks [J ]. ffi'DJ. ~rn!t'!L:it3'.t®liJf1'E, 2014,1100 ),119.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(2015): 1. XU Xiaoliang, CHAI Huijun, XUE Qiang. Analysis of factors
influencing the front turnback efficiency of metro train [J].
[ 3] KFH Group. Transit capacity and quality of service manual, Urban Mass Transit, 2014, 17(10): 119.