during proposal preparation to effectively coordinate the design process. This plan should include the scope, budget, and schedule for performing the work, integrating and interfacing work by various design disciplines. The scope of work defines design deliverables, drawings, and specifications for each discipline. DESIGN WORK PLAN The design cost is typically measured in work- hours, and a milestone bar chart is used to schedule the work packages. A work breakdown structure is then developed, defining the various work packages required to generate design deliverables. The number of design-hours is assigned to each work package for each discipline, and a milestone bar chart is created. DESIGN WORK PLAN The cost-loaded bar chart is produced weekly for monitoring and coordinating the project. A earned-value analysis can be performed for each week during the design process, comparing actual design-hours billed to the job and planned design- hours to measure the performance of the design process. PRODUCING CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The use of computers in design evaluation and contract document production offers numerous design alternatives that were once prohibitive. However, excessive computer use can lead to overdesigning, overwriting, and overdrafting, which can result in errors in contract documents. To prevent this, lead designers should develop a system to monitor design efforts, ensuring progress without excessive billable hours while producing well-defined plans and specifications for contractors. This will reduce complaints of errors and lack of constructability in construction drawings. MANAGING SCOPE GROWTH DURING DESIGN Some designers make design changes to please clients without considering the impact on the project's cost and schedule. These changes can be categorized as project development or scope growth. Project development involves changes needed to accommodate the current defined scope, while scope growth alters the project's original scope. A process to control scope growth is necessary for any design effort, with both the owner and engineer committed to scope and change control. The owner must be serious about freezing project scope after the conceptual design stage. Every proposed change must undergo a formal review and approval process considering cost and schedule implications and consequential effects on other activities. The owner and engineer should agree on a change management philosophy and plan. For example, under what conditions will changes be considered: If it won't work? If there are legal implications? If there are environmental impacts? When changes are proposed, there must be an answer to such questions as: Does the change add value and is the change necessary? A "no- later-than" date for freezing scope should be agreed to by the owner and the engineer. In a competitive market, the owner may want to modify the project scope during design and construction to suit the functionality of the completed project. This requires more collaboration between the design team and the owner, who must be informed of the full impact of scope changes. The cost of engineering and construction must be evaluated against future financial benefits, including revenues, operations, and maintenance of the facility. The project budget should include a contingency for changes in scope and a management reserve for scope growth. Proposed changes must be transmitted to all discipline managers, who must determine and report the cost and schedule impacts. Work must not proceed until these impacts are reviewed and approved by the owner's representative, engineering manager, and project manager. MANAGING SMALL PROJECTS MANAGING SMALL PROJECTS A project manager often has multiple projects at once, but the challenge lies in managing each project with the necessary attention, complicating schedule and resource control. Due to minimal staff, the project manager must share resources with other managers, requiring them to take responsibility for multiple functions. Time management is crucial, as the project manager may find themselves waiting for information or addressing pressing needs of multiple projects simultaneously. MANAGING SMALL PROJECTS TABLE 10-1 ATTRIBUTES OF SMALL PROJECTS TEAM PERSONNEL Have a "can do" attitude Prefer a hands-on approach to work Dislike bureaucracy Are decision makers Need little or no supervision Have a value system to make the customer satisfied Are good communicators Prefer to talk out problems Know when to stop an activity when things are going wrong Has the personality and people skills to coerce people to be responsive to his or her needs Has the ability to navigate through the various departments of his or her company to get things done paragraph text PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS Design is a creative process involving diverse expertise and numerous decisions that impact a project. Interfacing related work is crucial for project compatibility, and this can only be achieved through effective communication at weekly team meetings. These meetings should be held weekly throughout the project to maintain team unity and ensure continuous information exchange. Conflicts can be resolved through open discussions and compromise, and the project manager should not dominate discussions. Team members may be assigned to lead discussions based on their expertise. PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS
An agenda should be prepared to direct meetings, including a
list of items discussed, including work completed, in progress, scheduled, and special problems. Attendees should participate in meetings, and the project manager should prepare and distribute minutes. Meetings should be productive, but they can be a source of irritation and wasted time if not properly planned and conducted. Table 10-2 provides guidelines for conducting team meetings. PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS TABLE 10-2 GUIDELINES FOR PRODUCTIVE MEETINGS Develop and publish an agenda in advance to permit better participation by attendees. List unfinished items from previous meetings on the agenda, including the names of individuals who are responsible for reporting on status. Restrict attendance only to individuals who need to attend. Don't waste time by discussing events that do not pertain to the purpose of the meeting. Pick a meeting leader who is a leader and facilitator, not a dictator, to ensure the meeting is conducted In an informative environment. Maintain strict agenda control; follow the items in order with set time limits for discussions. Avoid interruptions, such as phone calls, as much as possible. WEEKLY/MONTLY REPORTS WEEKLY/MONTHLY REPORTS Project management involves preparing regular reports that are beneficial to the receiver. A project manager should prepare two routine reports: a weekly highlight report and a monthly report for each project. The weekly report should include work completed, work in progress, work scheduled, and special problems. The monthly report should include milestones, cost comparisons, and time schedules. Trend reports should show the anticipated project completion date and total cost forecast. WEEKLY/MONTHLY REPORTS
The monthly report is used by upper management and the
owner's representative as a permanent record for the project file. A consistent format for both reports is essential for comparisons, evaluation of progress, and individual accountability. Reports serve as a means of recognition of good performance and serve as a means of communication. DRAWING AND EQUIPMENT INDEX DRAWING AND EQUIPMENT INDEX The final product of design work is a set of contract documents, including drawings and specifications, that guide the physical construction of the project. A project manager must develop a work plan, which includes work packages prepared by each designer. Each package includes a list of anticipated drawings and expected completion dates. A drawing index, created by assembling the list of drawings from all team members, is valuable for design coordination and scheduling construction. DRAWING AND EQUIPMENT INDEX
The drawing index is constantly changing as design
progresses, with the number of drawings varying depending on the final design configuration. Each designer must revise the list as needed and keep the project manager informed. DRAWING AND EQUIPMENT INDEX An equipment index is a valuable tool for project managers, listing major equipment to be installed in a project. It serves as a reference document for tracking equipment purchases and deliveries, scheduling field installation during construction. The index includes drawing numbers, vendors, purchase orders, and expected delivery dates. It helps the project manager contact vendors in advance to ensure timely delivery, reducing delays caused by late equipment and material delivery. DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS The design process necessitates timely document distribution and information exchange among team members. Inefficient distribution increases work load, productivity, and frustration. A project manager can create a distribution of documents key sheet to show document routing among team members and other participants. This communication tool verifies recipients, eliminating the need to contact unavailable individuals. DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS
It differs from traditional company routing slips by having the
project title and team member names at the top, making it easier to identify which project the document is directed to and who is receiving it. A unique distribution of documents key sheet is essential for each project, easily prepared, duplicated, and bound in a tablet form. AUTHORITY/RESPONSIBILITY CHECK LIST AUTHORITY/RESPONSIBILITY CHECK LIST A project manager dealing with multiple projects often faces the challenge of managing all projects simultaneously. To manage this, they can create an authority/responsibility check list for each project, which is updated to show the status of completed, active, and pending work. This helps in organizing team meetings, organizing work, and preparing reports for upper management and the owner's representative. AUTHORITY/RESPONSIBILITY CHECK LIST The list can be prepared as a computer word processing file for each project, allowing easy addition, deletion, or modification. A more effective method is using a computer electronic spreadsheet, which allows the project manager to perform any desired sort and is a valuable tool for managing any single or multiple projects. The spreadsheet also provides a thorough documentation of the project's history, useful for future reference and retracing events. CHECKLIST OF DUTIES FOR DESIGN CHECKLIST OF DUTIES FOR DESIGN Table 10-3 lists duties for the design phase of a construction management (CM) contract project. For non-CM contracts, duties are distributed between owner and designer, depending on the contract arrangement. The architect is the principal design professional for building projects and the engineer for heavy industrial projects. TEAM MANAGEMENT TEAM MANAGEMENT
Effective teamwork is crucial for successful project
management. A project manager has three responsibilities: within the team, between the team and the client, and between the team and other management. They must coordinate the team to minimize disruptions, identify problems immediately, and act quickly to resolve them. Table 10-4 lists typical problems related to team management. TEAM MANAGEMENT A team is a group of individuals responsible for performing work on multiple projects, and as the number of projects increases, the risk of losing priorities increases. The project manager must set priorities at the start of the project and ensure that project objectives are clear and understood by team members. Poor communication is a common issue, and meetings should be held regularly to keep team members informed and to resolve problems. TEAM MANAGEMENT
Scope changes by the owner can negatively affect the project
budget and schedule, so team members should be cautious of expanding the scope without a written agreement. The project manager is responsible for overall coordination of the entire team, as well as individual coordination between team members. They must instill an environment of cooperation and management support from their organization, keeping management informed of the team's status and needs. EVALUATION OF DESGIN EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS
Design is a complex process that involves applying technical
knowledge to creative ideas to produce specific construction instructions. It significantly impacts cost and schedule, making it essential to have the most effective design possible. The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has sponsored research and published papers on project management, including the Evaluation of Design Effectiveness. EVALUATION OF DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS This method is not intended to evaluate a designer or the design process but rather measure design effectiveness and outputs. Measurement of design productivity is more difficult than in the construction phase due to variations in drawing size and content. To improve the total design process, researchers suggest using an objectives matrix for productivity evaluation. The matrix consists of criteria, weights, performance scale, and performance index. The performance index is calculated to indicate and track performance. The seven criteria of design effectiveness are represented by an "X" in the appropriate box. EVALUATION OF DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS
The performance index is a matrix that represents the sum of
all values for a criterion. Scores can be obtained in three ways: judgmental, based on a single quantitative measurement, or a combination of several subcriteria represented by a matrix. Judgmental scoring can be used for some or all criteria, while quantitative measures can be used for some criteria. Benchmark values are entered into boxes representing appropriate scores for each criterion, with a score of 3 being considered normal or average. EVALUATION OF DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS
The performance value attained is entered at the top of each
column, and a lower score is used if a performance level falls between two scores. A submatrix can combine subcriteria into a single criterion score. This method can be used to develop a common understanding between the owner, designer, and contractor about design effectiveness, compare similar projects, and identify opportunities for improvement. CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSTRUCTABILITY
The integration of engineering and construction in
construction projects has increased due to new technologies like 3DCAD, robotics, and automation. These innovations enable designs to be configured for efficient construction, promoting the exchange of ideas between construction and design before and during design. The Constructability Institute (CII) has sponsored research and published reports on constructability concepts, including a Constructability Concepts File. CONSTRUCTABILITY
Five factors should be considered in constructability
decisions: simplicity, flexibility, sequencing, substitution, and labor skill/availability. Simplicity is crucial for constructable designs, as it avoids unnecessary complexity and increases the probability of unsatisfactory results. Flexibility allows field construction personnel to select alternative methods or innovative approaches. Sequencing of installation is essential, and design should consider layout and spacing of facilities. Substitutions and alternatives should be considered during the design phase to minimize costs. Labor skill/availability should be fully explored early in the project life cycle. POST DESIGN REVIEW POST DESIGN REVIEW
Evaluation is crucial for improving project management. The
project manager must identify necessary modifications and improvements at the start of each project. After design completion, the manager and team conduct a candid evaluation, including team members and key participants. A checklist should be prepared to assess scope growth, quality match, owner expectations, conflicts, schedule changes, and budget comparison. A summary report with recommendations for future improvements should be prepared. THANK YOU!
Brian Sheppard v. Leon Beerman, As An Individual and in His Official Capacity As Justice of The Supreme Court of The State of New York, 94 F.3d 823, 2d Cir. (1996)