Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Strange Journey: John R. Friedeberg-Seeley and the Quest for Mental Health Paul Roberts Bentley file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Strange Journey: John R. Friedeberg-Seeley and the Quest for Mental Health Paul Roberts Bentley file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/building-american-public-health-
urban-planning-architecture-and-the-quest-for-better-health-in-
the-united-states-lopez/
https://ebookmass.com/product/lippincott-coursepoint-for-
videbecks-psychiatric-mental-health-nursing/
https://ebookmass.com/product/24-self-help-books-for-mental-
health-headway/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-long-grief-journey-how-long-
term-unresolved-grief-can-affect-your-mental-health-and-what-to-
do-about-it-blair/
On the Self: Discourses of Mental Health and Education
Julie Allan
https://ebookmass.com/product/on-the-self-discourses-of-mental-
health-and-education-julie-allan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-dead-letter-seeley-regester/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-healing-of-america-a-global-
quest-for-better-cheaper-and-fairer-health-care-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-0471705109-
consultation-skills-for-mental-health-professionals/
https://ebookmass.com/product/stem-h-for-mental-health-
clinicians-marilyn-weaver-lewis/
Strange Journey
John R. Friedeberg Seeley and the
Quest for Mental Health
North American Jewish Studies
Series Editor:
Ira Robinson (Concordia University)
Strange Journey
John R. Friedeberg Seeley and
the Quest for Mental Health
Boston
2020
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
press academicstudiespress.com
www.academicstudiespress.com
For my Family:
List of Illustrations 1
Prologue 3
Epilogue 233
Notes 242
Bibliography 260
Index 267
A slight thing, like a phrase or jest, often makes a greater
revelation of character than battles where thousands fall.
—Plutarch, Life of Alexander
List of Illustrations
Cover Photo: Dr. W. Line, OBE; Col. E. Bullis; John R. Seeley; CMHA
President, Dr. J. Griffin. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH)
Archives, CMHA fonds.
1. Letter from Dr. Spock to Seeley, 1952. Seeley Papers, Los Angeles,
California.
2. John R. Friedeberg Seeley, March 2007.
3. Death Notice of Else Wolff, 1922, Borchardt-Pincus-Peise, Family
Website.
4. Seeley’s Poetry, ca. 1952. Fischer Papers, Toronto, Ontario.
5. Lorneville JCT CNR, 1908. Courtesy of the Ross Gray Collection.
6. Dr. Clarence Meredith Hincks (1885–1964), co-founder of the
Canadian National Committee for Mental Hygiene (CNCMH) in 1918,
serving as its first Director General. During the 1930s Dr. Hincks was
also, conjointly, head of the National Committees for Mental Hygiene
in the United States. Courtesy of CAMH Archives.
7. Clarence Hincks’ 1946 Macleans Article. Courtesy of CAMH Archives.
8. In 1942 Dr. Brock Chisholm was photographed in his Canadian Army
General Staff uniform at National Defense Headquarter. Courtesy of
CAMH Archives.
9. Memo from Seeley to Chisolm, ca. 1945. Seeley Papers, Los Angeles,
California.
10. American sociologist, professor, and author David Riesman sits and
reads a book, early 1950s. Photo by Pictorial Parade, Courtesy of Getty
Images.
11. Flow Chart “Mental Health in Canada,” 1947. Seeley Papers, Los
Angeles, California.
2 List of Illustrations
12. Prof. John Seeley, 1950s. Photo by Jeff Goode, Toronto Star, Getty
Images.
13. Forest Hill Junior High School, 1948. Baldwin Collection, Toronto
Reference Library.
14. The Toronto Psychiatric Hospital opened in 1925 at 2 Surrey Place.
Its focus expanded to encompass all branches of psychiatry following
the arrival of Dr. Aldwyn Stokes in 1947 as its director and head of
psychiatry. Courtesy of CAMH Archives.
15. Exterior View of Holy Blossom Temple, Bathurst St., Toronto (ca.1956).
Ontario Jewish Archives, Blankenstein Family Heritage Center, Item
932.
16. Toronto Daily Star coverage of School “Regrouping,” October 14, 1950.
17. Forest Hill, Looking S.W. from Old Forest Hill Road, 1953. Photo by
James Victor Salmon, Baldwin Collection, Courtesy of the Toronto
Reference Library.
18. Beatrice Fischer and John R. Seeley in her Home, 1990s. Courtesy of
Beatrice Fischer.
19. Letter from Seeley to Fischer, 1952. Fischer Papers, Toronto, Ontario.
20. Fischer’s Appointment Book, Fischer Papers, Toronto, Ontario.
21. Letter from Fischer to his Brothers, March 31, 1941. Fischer Papers,
Toronto, Ontario.
22. Martin Fischer with Patient, 1950s. Photo by Graham Bezant, Toronto
Star, Getty Images.
23. Letter from Margaret Seeley to the Fischers, 1950s. Fischer Papers,
Toronto, Ontario.
24. An Example of Seeley’s “Time Budget,” 1960s. Clara Thomas Archives,
York U.
25. Aldwyn Stokes, 1957. Courtesy of CAMH Archives.
26. Crestwood Heights hits the front page of the Toronto Daily Star, May 3,
1956.
27. Clayton Ruby, ca. 1950s. Photo by Rick Eglinton, Toronto Star, Getty
Images.
28. Murray Ross. Photo by Annette Buchowski, Toronto Star, Getty Images.
29. The Bentley’s of Port Greville, ca. 1910 (my Grandfather, “Wicks,”
second from left, bottom row; and his father George E. Bentley, second
from right, bottom row). Courtesy of the Mariners Museum, Newport
News, Virginia.
Prologue
For almost twenty years I trudged down the halls of the Clarke Institute
toward my psychiatrist’s corner office, the very halls that Seeley once
walked, hoping this time I would make the final breakthrough. In the early
sessions, I rejected the medication that was recommended. In fact, I made
it a condition of my participation in long-term psychotherapy that there
would be “no drugs.” Eventually, I came to regret this naïve pride in my
freedom. I threw myself into psychotherapy, and as much as I attended my
sessions dutifully, I studied the works of Freud, Jung, Kohut and other writ-
ers in the psychoanalytic tradition. Freud said that all psychoanalyses come
to some form of tragic ending. My experience of this was to learn that,
while the process itself was therapeutic, no particular insight or temps ret-
rouve would bring an end to my suffering. My psychiatrist once applauded
my efforts by saying that my success in coping with Obsessive-Compulsive
Disorder (OCD) by therapeutic means alone was worthy of academic pub-
lication. But it was the hope of a final cure that drove me on. Such hope
is a cruel master. It is no wonder hope was the last affliction to fly from
Pandora’s box.
Yet, through it all I made certain beneficial changes in my life. I aban-
doned the political ambitions that had once driven me from the London
School of Economics to Law School at McGill University. The more
self-contained career of a high school history teacher proved an effective
antidote in my case of what Seeley would refer to as “floating anxiety.”1 As
I settled into teaching, I became convinced that the techniques of my psy-
chotherapist might prove useful in the classroom. Moreover, mental health
in schools had become a central public policy issue during the course
of my career which began in the 1990’s. For example, the CBC reported
on October 7, 2014 that recent studies in the field of pediatric psychi-
atry suggest “there may be a need for a national strategy to address the
4 Prologue
I was shocked to learn that there was a directly relevant history here
in Canada to what has been presented in the media and institutional dis-
course, in my experience, as a new frontier in social policy. At the same
time, however, I was relieved to discover an historical model of preventive
psychiatry in Canadian schools which might lend perspective to the efforts
of today’s policy-makers, if not in my own practice as an educator. Then the
question became whether a trail of historical documents leading back to
this overlooked episode in the history of mental health in Canada could be
found? This problem was solved by the rather prolix writings of the leader
of the project, John R. Seeley.
When I began my search for more information about Seeley, I found
that his importance as an author and educator was not to be underesti-
mated. Many of his academic colleagues thought very highly of him. For
example, Professor Leonard Duhl, M.D., of the University of California,
Berkeley, wrote of his career in the following superlative terms:
John R. Seeley is superb. He is truly a Renaissance man with deep
perceptions, understanding and scholarship in vast numbers of fields
ranging from philosophy to mathematics to sociology. He is a social critic
and teacher with little competition. In fact, I can find nothing but superb
adjectives to describe the mind, the heart and the soul of this man. Any
place that gets him as a professor will be getting one of the outstanding
people in the world.3
His protégé Clayton Ruby, a Toronto lawyer famous for his defense
of Guy Paul Morin and Donald Marshal Jr., both wrongfully convicted
of murder, claimed that Seeley was a “leading figure in Canadian edu-
cation.” Similarly, Professor Morris Schwartz, of Brandeis University in
Massachusetts, wrote of Seeley: “He is the most gifted all-around social
scientist I know (and I do not make such statements lightly). His book
Crestwood Heights is the most sophisticated study of a community extant.”4
Indeed, the scholarly consensus remains that Crestwood Heights,
Seeley’s sociological study of the community of Forest Hill where he
conducted his mental health project in schools, was a significant literary
achievement:
David Riesman’s The Lonely Crowd (1950), John R. Seeley’s, Crestwood
Heights (1956) and William H. Whyte, Jr’s, The Organization Man (1956)
were classics of 1950s social science that had a major impact on social
6 Prologue
Like David, Seeley was a small man, described by his friend Beatrice Fischer
as “fey,” but he thought of himself as a conqueror, and the power of sym-
bols to work their way through the life of a man should never be under-
estimated. He wrote in Strange Journey, “It was not just that I knew about
David—I had been David once.” And so, unbeknownst to me, I had set out
on the “road to Damascus” to meet a man whose greatness was possibly of
biblical proportions.
Prologue 9
When I arrived at his humble bungalow just off Pico Boulevard in Los
Angeles, Seeley was on his death bed at the age of 94. Despite the rather
unkempt environment of his home, into and out of which roamed a few
of his sons, grandsons and Hispanic nurses, a glimmer of the charisma for
which Seeley had been noted by his colleagues in Toronto in the 1950s still
shone through his aging body. His skill in articulation and his intellectual
versatility were an experience in themselves. We talked for hours at a time
over the course of my week-long visit. Though Seeley took little interest
in me, it was clear that I was to attend to his place in history with much
the same level of care that his nurses were expected to pay to his social
calendar.
After a few days of interviews, I was so impressed I asked Seeley if I
could write his biography. He said yes. This was the pact between us though
I underestimated how serious he was. In the moment, he complimented
me for the way I had been able to articulate the “central direction of his
career.” What he meant was that he appreciated my growing recognition of
the importance of his childhood and of his personal struggles with mental
illness to his adult projects. When I was not interviewing Seeley, I turned
to the task of digging through the piles of old junk in the alleyway garage
behind his house. I slowly dug through to the filing cabinets, like an archae-
ologist in some remote cave. Actually, I had to break into some of them
because the keys had been lost.
For all the miserable searching and sorting, pushing and pulling, it was
of course the very first file I came across which proved most useful. It was
marked, “Crestwood Heights: Staff Memos.”19 There were some other files I
felt were really interesting, like the correspondence I came across between
Seeley and Canadian philosopher George Grant. However, I regret to say
that I left them there because they did not seem chronologically relevant to
my topic. The Seeley–Grant correspondence took place in the sixties, some-
time after the Forest Hill Village Project, as did the letters he exchanged
with Anna Freud. This was my first mistake as a novice historian. Of course,
I never did return and have since learned not to be so linear in my approach
to historical research. But I did make one exception, which was to keep a
letter from Dr. Spock because it illustrated Seeley’s presence at the epicenter
of the early psychoanalytic movement.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Zarauz (Joaquin de), Contestacion á la vindicacion y Respuesta
que el capitan de navío de la Real armada Dn. Juan de Zarauz,
dió al suplemento del diario de Mexico del viernes, 8 de
Noviembre de 1805. Mexico, 1807.
Zarco (Francisco), Historia del Congreso Extraordinario
Constituyente de 1856 y 1857. Mexico, 1857. 2 vols.
Zarza (Juan A.), Siestas Dogmáticas. Mexico, 1765.
Zarzosa (Pedro), Representacion que eleva á la Cámara del
Senado. Mex., 1825.
Zavala (Lorenzo de), Dictámen sobre el proyecto de Ley. Mex.,
1834; Ensayo histórico de las Revoluciones de Megico. Paris,
etc., 1831. 2 vols.; Mex., 1845. 2 vols.; Manifiesto de los
principios políticos. Mex., 1828; Proyecto de reforma del
Congreso. Mex., 1822; Viaje á los Estados Unidos. Mérida,
1846; Voto del diputado sobre el proyecto de reglamento
político. [Mex., 1823.]
Zavala (Manuel Quixano), La venerable congregacion del oratorio
de Felipe Neri. Mexico, 1782.
Zelaa é Hidalgo (José María), Discursos panegíricos ó Sermones
varios. MS.; Glorias de Querétaro. Mex., 1803; Vida Portentosa.
Mex., 1812.
Zelaeta (Juan), Manifiesto á sus compatriotas. Mexico, 1837.
Zerecero (Anastasio), Memorias para la Historia de las
Revoluciones en Mexico. Mex., 1869. 2 vols.; Observaciones
del ciudadano á la constitucion. Mex., 1857.
Zevallos (Francisco), Vida del P. Fernando Konsag. Mexico, 1764.
Zomera y Piña (Manuel), Esposicion que hace de sus actos de la
invasion francesa. Mexico, 1867.
Zorilla (José), El Delator. Mex., 1857; Lecturas. Mex., 1864;
Traidor inconfeso y Mártir. Mex., 1850.
Zorita (Alonso de), Breve y sumaria relacion de los señores en la
Nueva España. In Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col. Doc., tom. ii.
Zozaya (José M.), Apelacion al Tribunal de la Opinion Pública.
Mexico, 1839.
Zuazo (Diego de), Oracion Evangélica y Panegyrica de la
Purificacion. Mexico, 1703. MS.
Zuazo (Licenciado), Carta al Señor de Xevres. In Pacheco and
Cárdenas, Col. Doc., tom. i.
Zumárraga, Carta á su Magestad del Obispo electo D. Juan de
Zumárraga, Agosto 27, 1529. In Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col.
Doc., tom. xiii.
Zumárraga (Juan), Pastoral sobre fundacion de la Catedral de
Mexico. Mexico, 1534. MS.
Zúñiga y Ontiveros (Felipe), Calendario Manual y Guia de
Forasteros de Mexico. Mexico, 1789.
Zurita (Ramon M.), Esposicion al Supremo Gobierno de la
República. Mexico, 1845.
NEW SPAIN AS KNOWN TO THE CONQUERORS IN 1521.
HISTORY OF MEXICO.
CHAPTER I.
VOYAGE OF HERNANDEZ DE CÓRDOBA TO YUCATAN.
1516-1517.
FOOTNOTES
[1] In the memorial of Antonio Velazquez, successor of the adelantado, Diego
Velazquez, Memorial del negocio de D. Antonio Velazquez de Bazan, in Mendoza,
Col. Doc. Inéd., x. 80-6, taken from the archives of the Indies, the credit of this
expedition is claimed wholly for the governor. Indeed, Velazquez himself
repeatedly asserts, as well as others, that the expedition was made at his cost.
But knowing the man as we do, and considering the claims of others, it is safe
enough to say that the governor did not invest much money in it. The burden
doubtless fell on Córdoba, who was aided, as some think, by his associates,
Cristóbal Morante and Lope Ochoa de Caicedo, in making up what the men of
Darien lacked, Torquemada, i. 349, notwithstanding the claims for his fraternity of
Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., i. Ogilby, Hist. Am., 76, says the three associates were
all Cuban planters; that they equipped three ships, Velazquez adding one. This
Hernandez de Córdoba was not he who served as lieutenant under Pedrarias,
though of the same name.
[2] Opinion has been divided as to the original purpose of the expedition. As it
turned out, it was thought best on all sides to say nothing of the inhuman and
unlawful intention of capturing Indians for slaves. Hence, in the public documents,
particularly in the petitions for recompense which invariably followed discoveries,
pains is taken to state that it was a voyage of discovery, and prompted by the
governor of Cuba. As in the Décadas Abreviadas de los Descubrimientos,
Mendoza, Col. Doc. Inéd., viii. 5-54, we find that ‘El adelantado Diego Velazquez
de Cuéllar es autor del descubrimiento de la Nueva España,’ so, in effect, it is
recorded everywhere. Indeed, Bernal Diaz solemnly asserts that Velazquez at first
stipulated that he should have three cargoes of slaves from the Guanaja Islands,
and that the virtuous one hundred indignantly refused so to disobey God and the
king as to turn free people into slaves. ‘Y desque vimos los soldados, que aquello
que pedia el Diego Velazquez no era justo, le respondimos, que lo que dezia, no
lo mandaua Dios, ni el Rey; que hiziessemos á los libres esclavos.’ Hist. Verdad.,
i. On the strength of which fiction, Zamacois, Hist. Méj., ii. 224, launches into
laudation of the Spanish character. The honest soldier, however, finds difficulty in
making the world believe his statement. Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 348, does not
hesitate to say very plainly that the expedition was sent out to capture Indians, ‘ir é
enviar á saltear indios para traer á ella,’ for which purpose there were always men
with money ready; and that on this occasion Córdoba, Morante, and Caicedo
subscribed 1,500 or 2,000 castellanos each, to go and catch Indians, either at the
Lucayas Islands or elsewhere. Torquemada, i. 349, writes more mildly, yet plainly
enough; ‘para ir à buscar Indios, à las Islas Convecinas, y hacer Rescates, como
hasta entonces lo acostumbraban.’ Cogolludo, Hist. Yucathan, 1-6, follows Bernal
Diaz almost literally. Gomara, Hist. Ind., 60, is non-committal, stating first ‘para
descubrir y rescatar,’ and afterward, ‘Otros dizen que para traer esclauos de las
yslas Guanaxos a sus minas y granjerias.’ Oviedo and Herrera pass by the
question. Landa, Rel. de Yucatan, 16, ‘a rescatar esclavos para las minas, que ya
en Cuba se yva la gente apocando y que otros dizen que salio a descubrir tierra.’
Says the unknown author of De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta,
Col. Doc., i. 338, ‘In has igitur insulas ad grassandum et prædandum, ut ita dicam,
ire hi de quibus suprà dictum est, constituerant; non in Iucatanam.’ It is clear to my
mind that slaves were the first object, and that discovery was secondary, and an
after-thought.
[3] Bernal Diaz holds persistently to 110. It was 110 who came from Tierra Firme,
and after divers recruits and additions the number was still 110.
[4] Authorities vary, from four days given by Las Casas, and six by Oviedo, to 21
by Bernal Diaz and Herrera. The date of departure is also disputed, but the
differences are unimportant. Compare Peter Martyr, dec. iv. cap. vi.; Dufey,
Résumé Hist. Am., i. 93; Clavigero, Storia Mess., iii. 3; Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv.
348-63; Cogolludo, Hist. Yucathan, 3-8; Gomara, Hist. Ind., 60-1; Bernal Diaz,
Hist. Verdad., 1-2; Herrera, dec. ii. lib. ii. cap. xvii.; Solis, Hist. Mex., i. 22-4; Vida
de Cortés, or De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i.
331-41; March y Labores, Marina Española, i. 463-8; Robertson’s Hist. Am., i.
237-40; Fancourt’s Hist. Yuc., 5-8.
[5] Though remarkably fair and judicious in the main, Mr Prescott’s partiality for a
certain class of his material is evident. To the copies from the Spanish archives,
most of which have been since published with hundreds of others equally or more
valuable, he seemed to attach an importance proportionate to their cost. Thus,
throughout his entire work, these papers are paraded to the exclusion of the more
reliable, but more accessible, standard authorities. In the attempt, at this point, to
follow at once his document and the plainly current facts, he falls into an error of
which he appears unconscious. He states, Conq. Mex., i. 222, that Córdoba
‘sailed with three vessels on an expedition to one of the neighboring Bahama
Islands, in quest of Indian slaves. He encountered a succession of heavy gales
which drove him far out of his course.’ The Bahama Islands are eastward from
Habana, while Cape San Antonio is toward the west. All the authorities agree that
the expedition sailed directly westward, and that the storm did not occur until after
Cape San Antonio had been passed, which leaves Mr Prescott among other errors
in that of driving a fleet to the westward, in a storm, when it has already sailed
thither by the will of its commander, in fair weather.
[6] Following Gomara and Torquemada, Galvano mentions the name of no other
place in this voyage than that of Punta de las Dueñas, which he places in latitude
20°. He further remarks, Descobrimentos, 131, ‘He gẽte milhor atauiada que ha
em neuhũa outra terra, & cruzes em q’ os Indios adorauam, & os punham sobre
seus defuntos quando faleciam, donde parecia que em algum tẽpo se sentio aly a
fe de Christo.’ The anonymous author of De Rebus Gestis and all the best
authorities recognize this as the first discovery. ‘Sicque non ad Guanaxos, quos
petebant, appulerunt, sed ad Mulierum promontorium.’ Fernando Colon places on
his map, 1527, y: de mujeres; Diego de Ribero, 1529, d’ mugeres, the next name
north being amazonas. Vaz Dourado, 1571, lays down three islands which he calls
p:. de magreles; Hood, 1592, Y. de mueres; Laet, 1633, Yas de mucheres; Ogilby,
1671, yas desconocidas; Dampier, 1699, I. mugeras; Jefferys, 1776, Ia de
Mujeres, or Woman’s I. It was this name that led certain of the chroniclers to
speak of islands off the coast of Yucatan inhabited by Amazons. ‘Sirvió de asilo en
nuestros dias al célebre pirata Lafitte.’ Boletin de la Sociedad Mex. de Geog., iii.
224.
[7] For a description of these people see Bancroft’s Native Races, i. 645-747.
[8] See Landa, Rel. de Yuc., 6. ‘Domum Cotoche sonat: indicabant enim domus et
oppidum haud longè abesse.’ De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta,
Col. Doc., i. 339. ‘Conez cotoche, q̄ quiere dezir, Andad aca a mis casas.’ Herrera,
dec. ii. lib. ii. cap. xvii. ‘Cotohe, cotohe,’ that is to say, ‘a house.’ Fancourt’s Hist.
Yuc., 6. ‘Cotoche, q̄ quiere dezir casa.’ Gomara, Hist. Ind., 61. ‘Con escotoch, con
escotoch, y quiere dezir, andad acá á mis casas.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 2.
This, the north-eastern point of Yucatan, is on Fernando Colon’s map, 1527,
gotoche; on the map of Diego de Ribero, 1529, p: d’cotoche; Vaz Dourado, 1571,
C:. de quoteche; Pilestrina, c:. de sampalq. Hood places a little west of the cape a
bay, B. de conil; the next name west is Atalaia. Goldschmidt’s Cartog. Pac. Coast,
MS., i. 358. Kohl, Beiden ältesten Karten, 103, brings the expedition here the 1st
of March. Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 350, confounds Córdoba’s and Grijalva’s
voyages in this respect, that brings the former at once to Cozumel, when, as a
matter of fact, Córdoba never saw that island.
[9] So called by the natives, but by the Spaniards named San Lázaro, because ‘it
was a Domingo de Lazaro’ when they landed. Yet Ribero writes chãpa, while Vaz
Dourado employs llazaro, and Hood, Campechy; Laet gives the name correctly;
Ogilby and Jefferys call the place S. Frco de Campeche. ‘Los Indios le deziã
Quimpech.’ Herrera, dec. ii. lib. ii. cap. xvii.
[10] Now Champoton, applied to river and town. Ribero writes camrõ; Hood,
Champoto; Mercator, Chapãton, and town next north, Maranga. Potonchan, in the
aboriginal tongue, signifies, ‘Stinking Place.’ Mercator has also the town of
Potõchan, west of Tabasco River. West-Indische Spieghel, Patõcham. Laet,
Ogilby, and Jefferys follow with Champoton in the usual variations. ‘Y llegaron á
otra provincia,’ says Oviedo, i. 498, ‘que los indios llaman Aguanil, y el principal
pueblo della se dice Moscoba, y el rey ó caçique de aquel señorio se llama
Chiapoton;’ and thus the author of De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, ‘Nec diu
navigaverant, cùm Mochocobocum perveniunt.’ Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., 340.
[11] Pinzon and Solis must have found alligators in their northward cruise,
otherwise Peter Martyr could not honestly lay down on his map of India beyond
the Ganges, in 1510, the baya d’ lagartos north of guanase. Mariners must have
given the coast a bad name, for directly north of the R. de la of Colon, the R:. de
laḡ r̄ tos of Ribero, the R:. de lagarts of Vaz Dourado, and the R. de Lagartos of
Hood, are placed some reefs by all these chart-makers, and to which they give the
name Alacranes, Scorpions. The next name west of Lagartos on Map No. x.,
Munich Atlas, is costanisa, and on No. xiii. Ostanca. Again next west, on both, is
Medanos. On No. x., next to costa nisa, and on No. xiii., west of Punta de las
Arenas, is the name Ancones. Ogilby gives here B. de Conil, and in the interior
south, a town Conil; east of R. de Lagartos is also the town Quyo, and in large
letters the name Chuaca.
[12] ‘Dezian los Españoles q’ estavan hablãdo con el Diego Velazquez, y con los
Indios: Señor estos Indios dizen, que su tierra se llama Yucatã, y assi se, quedò
cõ este nõbre, que en propria lengua no se dize assi.’ Hist. Verdad., 5. Gomara,
Hist. Ind., 60, states that after naming Catoche, a little farther on the Spaniards
met some natives, of whom they asked the name of the town near by. Tecteta, was
the reply, which means, ‘I do not understand.’ The Spaniards, accepting this as the
answer to their question, called the country Yectetan, and soon Yucatan. Waldeck,
Voy. Pittoresque, 25, derives the name from the native word ouyouckutan, ‘listen
to what they say.’ The native name was Maya. See Bancroft’s Native Races, v.
614-34. There are various other theories and renderings, among them the
following: In answer to Córdoba’s inquiry as to the name of their country, the
natives exclaimed, ‘uy u tan, esto es: oyes como habla?’ Zamacois, Hist. Mej., ii.
228. ‘Que preguntando a estos Indios, si auia en su tierra aquellas rayzes que se
llama Yuca.... Respondian Ilatli, por la tierra en que se plantan, y que de Yuca
juntado con Ilatli, se dixo Yucatta, y de alli Yucatan.’ Herrera, dec. ii. lib. ii. cap.
xviii. Whencesoever the origin, it was clearly a mistake, as there never was an
aboriginal designation for the whole country, nor, like the Japanese, have they
names for their straits or bays. For some time Yucatan was supposed to be an
island. Grijalva called the country Isla de Santa María de Remedios, though that
term was employed by few. In early documents the two names are united;
instance the instructions of Velazquez to Cortés, where the country is called la
Ysla de Yucatan Sta María de Remedios. On Cortés’ chart of the Gulf of Mexico,
1520, it is called Yucatan, and represented as an island. Colon, 1527, and Ribero,
1529, who write Ivcatan; Ptolemy, in Munster, 1530, Iucatana; Orontius, on his
globe, 1531, Iucatans; Munich Atlas, no. iv., 1532-40, cucatan; Baptista Agnese,
1540-50, Iucatan; Mercator, 1569, Ivcatan; Michael Lok, 1582, Incoton; Hondius,
1595, Laet, Ogilby, etc., Yucatan, which now assumes peninsular proportions.
[13]
Arms of the Republic of Mexico.