Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Russia Resurrected: Its Power and Purpose in a New Global Order Kathryn E. Stoner file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Russia Resurrected: Its Power and Purpose in a New Global Order Kathryn E. Stoner file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-politics-power-and-
purpose-in-global-affairs-4th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/germanys-role-in-european-russia-
policy-a-new-german-power-1st-edition-liana-fix/
https://ebookmass.com/product/power-transition-in-the-anarchical-
society-rising-powers-institutional-change-and-the-new-world-
order-tonny-brems-knudsen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/russias-invasion-of-ukraine-
economic-challenges-embargo-issues-and-a-new-global-economic-
order-paul-j-j-welfens/
Energy Culture: Work, Power, and Waste in Russia and
the Soviet Union Jillian Porter
https://ebookmass.com/product/energy-culture-work-power-and-
waste-in-russia-and-the-soviet-union-jillian-porter/
https://ebookmass.com/product/living-in-bonus-time-surviving-
cancer-finding-new-purpose-alec-hill/
https://ebookmass.com/product/dancing-on-bones-history-and-power-
in-china-russia-and-north-korea-2022-katie-stallard/
https://ebookmass.com/product/linear-algebra-and-its-
applications-global-edition-lay/
https://ebookmass.com/product/witchcraft-in-russia-and-
ukraine-1000-1900-a-sourcebook-valerie-a-kivelson/
Russia Resurrected
Russia Resurrected
Its Power and Purpose in a New Global Order
K AT H RY N E . S TO N E R
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190860714.001.0001
1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America
For my parents,
Joan Boyd and Norman Stoner,
with gratitude for inspiring a love of learning in me
“In just 30 years, we have undergone changes that took centuries
in other countries.”
—Vladimir Putin, March 1, 2018, Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments ix
List of Figures xiii
List of Tables xvii
Note on Transliterations xix
1. Is Russia Resurrected? 3
vii
viii Contents
Notes 269
Index 303
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ix
x Acknowledgments
I wondered how and why, and this study of Russia’s resurrection as a global
power is the result. The sober assessment it provides aims to convince the reader
that under Putin’s autocratic regime, Russian capabilities are beginning to ap-
proach its global aspirations.
This study could not have been completed without the opportunities that
I have gained from my position as a Senior Fellow and Deputy Director at the
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI) at Stanford University.
The intellectual environment in our seminars, and the brain trust in our building,
Encina Hall, proved invaluable to bringing this project to completion. I am par-
ticularly indebted to Ambassador Michael McFaul, the Institute’s Director, for
his patience in listening to me talk about this book for several years, providing
me with the time to actually write it, and his insightful comments on the draft
manuscript. Thanks also to my other Stanford colleagues Chip Blacker, David
Holloway, Stephen Krasner and Larry Diamond for attending and commenting
upon various presentations that I gave on the book here at Stanford. I owe a
great deal of gratitude too to my colleague Francis Fukuyama for helping me
to think more deeply about the concept of power, as well as to John Dunlop,
and Anna Grzymala-Busse for their careful reads of the manuscript, occasional
corrections and vital suggestions for improvement. Condoleeza Rice and Sheri
Berman (at Barnard College) read the prospectus for this book and I am grateful
for their enthusiasm for the project and encouragement. Secretary Rice also
generously shared some of her insights into the younger Vladimir Putin and
her experiences as Secretary of State with a few other members of his foreign
policy apparatus. Rose Gottemoeller, former deputy secretary general of NATO
generously reviewed chapters 3 and 6. Colleagues in Russia like Dmitri Trenin,
Andrei Kortunov, and Fyodor Lukyanov (among others) were extremely patient
in explaining the Russian perspective on global politics.
Back at Stanford, Tiffany Zhu provided outstanding research assistance in
the final stages of research and Alice Underwood provided fantastic editing and
thoughtful suggestions as well as good cheer as the project finally came to con-
clusion. My students in POLISCI 213C “Understanding Russia” in the winter
quarter of 2020 were among the initial readers of the manuscript and their feed-
back made for a more comprehensible book to be sure.
Finally, on the home front, my deepest thanks to my wonderful husband, Paul
Oyer, who was a constant source of encouragement and irrepressible humor.
Thank you as well to our children (David Oyer, Lucy Oyer, Adam Weiss and
Abby Weiss) for their patience as I wrote this book. They learned far more about
Russia than they probably ever wanted to know! The COVID-19 pandemic
brought Abby and Lucy even closer to this project at the bitter end as they were
forced to come home to shelter in place. I owe them a special thanks for their
Acknowledgments xi
provision of coffee (both hot and iced) from our favorite place to keep me tap-
ping away at the keyboard happily.
Finally, I am particularly grateful to David McBride, possibly the most patient
editor in the world, for sticking with me for the years it took to bring this pro-
ject to fruition! Holly Mitchell saw it through production efficiently and with
good cheer.
While all of these kind people helped me with various aspects of this project,
any errors and omissions are mine alone.
Stanford California,
October, 2020.
FIGURES
xiii
xiv Figures
xvii
N O T E O N T R A N S L I T E R AT I O N S A N D S O U R C E S
Throughout this book, I use the Library of Congress transliteration system from
Cyrillic to Latin scripts. In some cases, where there is a familiar spelling for a
word, however, I employ the more familiar spelling (thus, Yeltsin rather than
El’tsin, for example).
I have tried to use the most recent available sources and data for what follows.
Still, at the time of writing, there was variation in this regard for some of the ec-
onomic and demographic data. As a result, the reader will find one or two cases
where the most recent data available was 2015 as opposed to 2019 or 2020. In
all cases, links to where data sources can be found are provided, so that a reader
may go to look for updates.
xix
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Matonineae 355–363; Hymenophyllaceae 363–365; Cyatheaceae 365–
375; Polypodiaceae 375–380; Dipteridinae 380–394.
CHAPTER XXII
MARATTIALES (FOSSIL). Pp. 395–411.
CHAPTER XXIII
PSARONIEAE. Pp. 412–426.
CHAPTER XXIV
OPHIOGLOSSALES (FOSSIL). Pp. 427–431.
CHAPTER XXV
COENOPTERIDEAE. Pp. 432–472.
I. Botryoptereae 434–443
II. Zygoptereae 443–470
CHAPTER XXVI
HYDROPTERIDEAE AND SAGENOPTERIS. Pp. 473–483.
CHAPTER XXVII
GENERA OF PTERIDOSPERMS, FERNS, AND PLANTAE INCERTAE SEDIS.
Pp. 484–580.
Sphenophyllum.
The account of the Sphenophyllales given in the first volume[2] of
this work must be extended and somewhat modified in the light of
recent work on the fertile shoots of Sphenophyllum.
Sphenophyllostachys Dawsoni (Will.) was described as consisting
of an axis bearing superposed whorls of bracts connate at the base
in the form of a shallow funnel-shaped collar giving off from the
upper surface and close to the axis of the cone two concentric series
of sporangiophores. Occasionally there are three series, as
represented in fig. 112. In another type of strobilus,
Sphenophyllostachys Römeri[3] each sporangiophore terminates in
two pendulous sporangia (fig. 113, A; see also fig. 107, C, vol. i.). It
has already been pointed out that the common occurrence of
detached strobili necessitates their description under distinct specific
names; it is only by a rare accident that we can assign fossil cones
to their vegetative shoots. There are, however, reasons for believing
that Sphenophyllostachys Dawsoni is the strobilus of the plant
originally described by Sternberg[4] from impressions of foliage-
shoots as Rotularia cuneifolia. Another difficulty presented by
petrified material is that of determining, with certainty, whether two
imperfect specimens, differing from one another in features which do
not appear to be of sufficient importance to warrant specific
separation, are forms of one species or portions of specifically
distinct cones. It has been pointed out by Scott[5] that the strobilus
known as Sphenophyllostachys Dawsoni probably includes two
distinct species, one being the cone of Sphenophyllum cuneifolium
Sternb., and the other the cone of S. myriophyllum Crép[6]. The stem
of S. myriophyllum agrees anatomically with the type known as
Sphenophyllum plurifoliatum Will. and Scott[7].
Fig. 113.
A. Sphenophyllostachys Römeri. (Solms-Laubach.)
B. Sphenophyllum trichomatosum Stur.
C. Sphenophyllum majus. Bronn. (A–C. After Kidston.)