Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VAT Administration
VAT Administration
VAT
VAT Administration
5.0 Introduction
This chapter focuses on VAT administration. It explains the VAT assessments, VAT accounts,
corrections of errors and VAT returns. It further talks about penalties and interest for tax
noncompliance, VAT tax evasion, VAT tax avoidance and how to deals with tax
noncompliance. Finally, it discusses the procedures and challenges brought by VAT refunds.
OBJECTIVES
1. adding all output tax that becomes payable by the person in that tax period
2. subtracting all input tax credits allowed in that tax period, and
3. adjusting the resulting amount by-
i. adding all increasing adjustments required to be made in that tax period; and
ii. Subtracting all decreasing adjustments allowed in that tax period.
These adjustments are made in the tax period in the tax period in which the taxable person
becomes aware of the adjustment event (Section 73(1) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
Example 1
Suppose that there is Tshs 10,000,000 output tax, and Tshs 7,000,000 input tax in the current
month. Also, there was negative amount of the Tshs 200,000 for the previous month, and Tshs
300,000 for the month before previous month.
Required
Compute net amount of the current month is there is no adjustments in the current month.
Solution
Similarly, where an adjustment event has the effect that the value added tax previously
accounted for by the supplier exceeds the value added tax properly payable on the supply the
supplier be allowed a decreasing adjustment equal to the amount of the difference; and
issue a valid adjustment note to the customer within seven (7) days of becoming aware of
the event; and where the customer is a taxable person, is required to make an increasing
adjustment (Section 71(1) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
The amount of a decreasing adjustment allowed to customers when the value added tax
previously accounted for by the supplier is less than the value added tax properly payable on
the supply (when the price paid by the customer (Tshs 100)) is less than the correct price
(Tshs 150) so the customer make addition payment (Tshs 50); or an increasing adjustment
the customer makes when an adjustment event has the effect that the value added tax
previously accounted for by the supplier (when the price paid by the customer (Tshs 150)
exceeds the value added tax properly payable on the supply ((Tshs 100) so the customer get
refunded (Tshs 50)) after a post supply adjustment is equal to:
1. if the customer is entitled to a full input tax credit for the original acquisition, the
amount of the difference (150-100) x18/118= Tshs 7.63;
2. if the customer is entitled to a credit for only part of the input tax on the original
acquisition (partial exempt suppose T/A =0.6), an appropriate proportion of the
amount of the difference; the adjustment is (150-100) x18/118 x .06 = Tshs 4.57; or
3. If the customer is not entitled to an input tax credit for only acquisition, nil (Section
71(3) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
Nonetheless, a customer can make decreasing adjustment only when he holds a valid
adjustment note issued by the supplier at the time when the customer submits value added
tax returns for the tax period in which the adjustment is claimed. Whereas, a supplier makes
a decreasing adjustment when he has issued an adjustment note to the customer and retained
a copy for his own records; and if the customer is not a registered person, he has repaid the
excess value added tax to the customer, whether in cash or as a credit against any amount
owing to the supplier by the customer.
Moreover, where a supplier refunds part or all of the price paid to a non-taxable person due
to: a cancellation of the supply, an alteration in the consideration for the supply or the return
of the thing supplied or part thereof to the supplier, the amount refunded shall, unless there is
evidence to the contrary, be presumed to include an amount of value added tax equal to
the tax fraction of the amount refunded. But, when a supplier refunds an amount because
a variation of, or alteration to, all or part of the supply and which h a s the effect that the
supply becomes or ceases to be a taxable supply the amount refunded would be presumed
to be the amount of value added tax that is no longer payable, unless there is evidence to
the contrary (Section 72 and 3 of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
1) the amount of the input tax credit the person was allowed for the acquisition or import
of the goods: supposed it was Tshs 9,000,000; or
2) if the property has been used in the person’s taxable activity before it is applied to private
use, the tax fraction of the fair market value of the property at the time it is first applied
wholly to a private use, reduced to reflect the extent to which no input tax credit was
allowed (Section 75(3) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014). This reduction of input tax
happens when a taxable person was not allowed all input tax due to being a partial exempt
supplier. Supposed, that a fair price of the property was Tshs 118,000,000 at the time of
changing uses of the property, and the person was not allowed deduction of input tax of
1,000,000. So the amount is 118,000,000 x 18/118 -1,000,000 = Tshs 17,000,000.
An insurer makes an increasing adjustment if: he recovers an amount, other than the
aggravated or exemplary damages, as a result of the exercise of rights acquired by subrogation
under a contract of insurance; and a decreasing adjustment is allowed to the insurer for the
payment to which the recovered amount relates (Section 77(3) of the Value Added Tax Act
2014). The amount of the increasing adjustment is equal to the tax fraction of the amount
recovered and the adjustment must be made in the value added tax return for the tax period in
which the amount is received (Section 77(4) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
Example 2
Bibi wewe Ltd sold Tshs 3,000,000 to Dada Ltd on credit on 1st July 2015. Since then Dada
Ltd has closed the office and its director went into hiding. Bibi wewe Ltd decided to write-off
the debt on 1st January 2016 after taking necessary steps as required the Value Added Tax laws.
Required
Solution
There is a decreasing adjustment when a balance of debt is not recovered, as debtor fails to pay
consideration of the supplies supplied including the value added tax now is Tshs 3,000,000
composed of output tax of Tshs 457,627 from Tshs 3,000,000 x18/188 and selling price
exclusive of value added tax Tshs 2,542,373.
However, the decreasing adjust of Tshs 457,627 is only available after the date has been
overdue for more than 12 more months in this case, the allowance is available after 1st July
2016. So, the company cannot deduct the decreasing adjustment and the customer cannot make
an increasing adjustment of Tshs 457,627.
Example 3
Bibi wewe Ltd sold Tshs 3,000,000 to Dada Ltd on credit on 1st June 2014. Since then Dada
Ltd has closed the office and its director went into hiding. But, Bibi wewe Ltd did not write-
off the debt as it hopes the customer will pay one day.
Required
Solution
There is a decreasing adjustment when a balance of debt is not recovered. The debt is assumed
irrecoverable after being overdue for more than 18 months: in this case is in February 2016.
At that time, the company will make decreasing adjust of Tshs 457,627 after writing-off the
debt and the customer has to make an increasing adjustment of Tshs 457,627.
However, when the bad debt is recovered, the supplier should account output tax equal to
the tax fraction of the consideration actually received, and the customer, is allowed input tax
credit is the appropriate proportion of the tax fraction of the consideration actually paid
(Section 74(4) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014; Regulation 25(4) of the Value Added Tax
(General) Regulations, 2015). This adjustment (bad debt recovered) must be made in the tax
period in which the customer first becomes aware of the adjustment event or in any period
only of the subsequent six tax periods (Section 73(2) (b) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
Example 4
Assume that in July 2016 Bibi wewe Ltd recovered all of the bad debt written in February i.e.
Tshs 3,000,000 from Dada Ltd on credit.
Required
Compute the increasing adjustment required and state when the adjustment has to be made in
the Bibi wewe Ltd’ books of accounts and those of the customers.
Solution
The total debt to be written off was Tshs 3,000,000 including output tax Tshs 457,627 (Tshs
3,000,000x18/118). Now it has recovered, there is an increase adjustment of the same amount
i.e. Tshs 457,627 to BiBi wewe Ltd, and the decreasing adjustment of Tshs 457,627.
BiBi wewe Ltd and the supplier will make the increasing adjustment in the period of receipt of
the balance i.e. July 2016, but Dada Ltd may make the decreasing adjustment any period
between July to December 2016 (tax period in which the customer first becomes aware of the
adjustment event or in any period only of the subsequent six tax periods.
VAT repayments cause several challenges. First, the potential for VAT refunds may increases
tax evasion in which taxpayers may overstate their input taxes deduction. Second, corruption
practice can go high as tax officials have authorities to allow or disallow input tax deduction.
Third, it is common for refunds to be made after long time has passed since claims have been
filed. This delay may lead taxpayers into financial stress as input taxes represent their working
capital tight up waiting for refunds.
Repayment of tax occurs where input taxes claimed in a period exceeds output taxes collected
in the same period. There are many reasons for VAT repayments. VAT tax repayment might
occurs when a taxable person exports taxable goods and services which are zero rated supplies
or when are sold at reduced rate to special relief persons. It is also possible that in particular
month taxable purchases and therefore input tax exceeds supplies of taxable goods and services
and then output tax in that month. This section, however, deals with refund to diplomats,
international bodies and non-profit organization. The Commissioner General within one tax
period after receiving the application for refund may refund part or all of the input tax
incurred on an acquisition or import by:
Yet, the person may apply for a refund of the amount; or choose to carry the amount forward
until such time as the person applies for a refund of the amount (Section 82(2) of the Value
Added Tax 2014). Nevertheless the application for refunds must be made not more than three
years after the end of the tax period to which the negative net amount relates (Section 83(2)
of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
Example 5
When a taxable person can be refunded negative net amount each month by the commissioner?
Solution
When a taxable person who has negative net amount may get refund without carry forward
when: fifty percent or more of the person’s turnover is or will be from supplies that are zero-
rated, fifty percent or more of the person’s input tax is incurred on acquisitions or imports
t h a t relate to making supplies that are or will be zero-rated; or in any other case, the
Commissioner General is satisfied that the nature of the person’s business regularly results in
negative net amounts
Additionally, The Commissioner General refunds if he is satisfied that the person is entitled to
a refund of the amount requested; or a lower amount represents the person’s actual entitlement
to a refund. Nevertheless, The Commissioner General does not refund the person if he is
satisfied that such person is not entitled to a refund. Also, the refund should not be paid unless
t h e applicant has filed all value added tax returns which the applicant is required to file; and
the Commissioner General may apply the refund first in reduction of any outstanding liability
of the person for value added tax or under another tax law, including any interest, penalties, or
fines payable under this Act or under that tax law. Also, if the amount remaining after deduction
of the existing liabilities does not exceed the minimum amount i.e. Tshs 100,000, the
Commissioner General may refund the amount or require the taxable person to take the
refund as a decreasing adjustment in a tax period prescribed by the Commissioner General.
Also, any allowed refund with the agreement of the Commissioner General, may be used as a
decreasing adjustment in a tax period agreed with the Commissioner General (Section 84 of
the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
It is mandatory that all taxable persons keep VAT account and accompanied records to show
how the input taxes, output taxes, adjustment were made (Government Notice NO. 177
Regulation 12(1)). There is no unique format of the VAT account but it is important to have
one that is appropriate to your business and must be kept monthly but is permanent account.
The connection between input taxes in VAT account and input taxes on VAT return must be
proved by records showing how deductible input taxes has been calculated. Furthermore, VAT
account shows any correction of errors that have happened in or in previous prescribed
accounting periods.
Taxable persons also are allowed to make adjustments for any discount allowed or received,
bad debt in the VAT account. Additionally, annual adjustments for input taxes for partial
exempt traders, issues or receiving of credit and debit notes, pre-registration and post
deregistration expenses can all affect the VAT account.
Once the VAT account is completed information can be shifted direct to VAT return and then,
the return must be filed and any payment due no later than one month after the end of your
accounting period.
VAT ACCOUNT
Tshs Tshs
Input tax –January XX Output tax-January XX
Bad debt relief XX Errors XX
VAT on discount received XX VAT on discount allowed XX
Annual adjustment-input tax XX Annual adjustment-input tax XX
Cash paid to TRA XX Refund received from TRA XX
Balance c/f YY Balance c/f ZZ
Xx XX
Balance b/f 1st February ZZ Balance b/f 1st February YY
Input tax-February Xx Output tax- February Xx
5.8 Correction of errors
Taxable persons normally prepare VAT returns themselves or through their tax agents. So it is
possible that they can make errors in computation of input taxes, output taxes and then VAT
liability or VAT repayment. Since commissioner has power to enter business premises, inspect
documents, including profit and loss accounts and balance sheets, take samples, and inspect
computers records taxable persons need make correct tax returns and correct their errors as
they find them (Section 42 of the Tax Administration Act 2015).
It is important for taxable persons to correct errors as soon as they are discovered to avoid
penalties and possibly criminal prosecution. Errors are inadvertent over declaration or under
declaration of the tax due. Separate records must be kept to show when the error was
discovered, the period in which the error occurred, any related document, and whether the error
was related to output or input taxes.
Correction of minor errors, are just made in a tax period in which the errors are discovered
by making an increasing adjustment or decreasing adjustment (Regulation 22(1) of the Value
Added Tax (General) Regulation, 2015; Section 78 of the Value Added Tax Act 2014). The
amended are made in the value added tax account and reflected in the value added tax return
of the subsequent tax period Regulation 22(3) of the Value Added Tax (General) Regulation,
2015). Then, the person amending a minor error should in writing notify the Commissioner
General for such correction (Regulation 22(2) of the Value Added Tax (General) Regulation,
2015). The treatment of errors can be summarized as follows.
Errors
The taxable persons are liable for interest when they do not correct discovered errors neither
notify the commissioner (Section 66(6) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014). Specifically, the
section provides that person who reports errors before the receipt of a notice of audit or
investigation, if any, shall pay the unpaid tax and the applicable interest for late payment. In
the notification taxpayer might inform the office about the following issue:
Max is a taxable person; on 12th March 2012 he discovered the following errors made in the
previous periods.
1. He transposed the figure of output tax from Tshs 33,000,000 to 3,300,000 on the VAT
return of December 2011.
2. Input VAT on motor car of Tshs 4, 000, 0000, was wrongly reclaimed as input tax in
February 2011.
3. He did not deduct input tax in respect of business entertainment of employee costing Tshs
2,000,000 VAT inclusive.
Required
Solution
The net amount of errors is Tshs (33,000,000 - 3,300,000) + Tshs 4,000,000 - Tshs 2,000,000x
18/118= Tshs 33,394,915. Since the net amount of errors, Max should apply for amending the
error to the commissioner general and the commissioner shall dictate how errors should be
amended and when.
Example 6
Mandago Co. Ltd was registered for VAT in 2011. It sells domestic and office supplies. For
the month of January 2012 it made the following transactions:
1. On 2nd January 2012 the company paid Tshs 1,000,000 to EXZ Ltd for purchase of
photocopy machine. The machine was delivered on 21st December 2011.
2. On 8th January 2012 the company’s customer from Zanzibar bought goods worth Tshs
4,000,000 and exported the goods to Zanzibar on the same day. In addition the company
purchased standard rated goods of value Tshs 5,000,000 before 18% VAT from Zanzibar
and imported them to its head office located in Dar es Salaam city.
3. On 9th January 2012 the company paid Tshs 3,000,000 for laptops from ABC Co. Ltd.
It also made donation of taxable goods amount to Tshs 1,000,000 to Inspire training
center- an education establishment.
4. On 15th January 2012 the company received Tshs 2,360,000 for sales of used laptops.
5. On 20th January 2012 standard rated goods were sold to one company who was given
10% discount. The value of goods before discount was Tshs 5,000,000.
6. On 25th January 2012 the company received an electronic fiscal receipt from Z Ltd a UK
company for importation of services worth Tshs 20,000,000. The service will be provided
in September 2012.
7. On 29th January 2012 the company received invoices for electricity (Tshs 200,000) and
telephone (Tshs 100,000). These bills were paid on 2nd February 2012.
8. On 31st January 2012 a customer returned goods worth Tshs 300,000 and the company
issued a credit note to acknowledge the return
9. On 31st it made a credit sales to her prominent customer of Tshs 4,000,000 and the
company offered him 10% discount if the balance is paid within 1 month.
10. Finally, it written off a bad debt of Tshs 400,000 after a customer went on hiding for 13
months.
Required
Solution
a) Computation of input taxes - since the person only sells taxable supplies computation of
input taxes is simple (summing all input taxes). The transaction values with exception of
goods from Zanzibar and exempt supplies are assumed to include value added tax. So
VAT fraction of 18/118 is applicable to compute input taxes and 100/118 to eliminate
output taxes taxable supplies made. Note that the value of imported service represents
reverse charge in which the person claims input tax in normal way and account for the
output tax collected.
b) Adjustment for bad debt written-off is Tshs 400,000x18/118 = Tshs 61,017 and the
adjustment for credit note is Tshs 300,000x18/118=Tshs 45,763.
c) VAT account in Tshs '000'
VAT account
Items Tshs Items Tshs
Input tax 5155.93 Output tax 6,019.38
Adjustment-bad debt 61
Adjustment- credit note 46
VAT payable for the month 756.45
6,019.38 6,019.38
d) Most information in VAT return is taken directly from the VAT account.
TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY
VALUE ADDED TAX RETURN / RITANI YA KODI YA ONGEZEKO LA THAMANI
Note / Tanbihi Before filling this form please read carefully instructions provided overleaf.
Kabla ya kujaza fomu hii tafadhali soma kwa uangalifu maelezo yaliyopo
nyuma ya fomu
For NIL return tick (ü) here 01 Kwa ritani isiyo na malipo weka alama (ü)
hapa
Declaration /Tamko
I hereby certify that the information given in this form is true and complete. / Nathibitisha kuwa
taarifa niliyotoa kwenye fomu hii ni sahihi na kamili
Note that the adjustments are only shown in the VAT account as the official VAT return does
not provide a place for that adjustment. The discrepancy between input taxes deducted and a
total of item 13 and 16 is because of the adjustments; consequently it is important to keep your
VAT account accurate and update.
The deferment is given by treating tax payable on taxable imports by the p e r s o n as if it were
output tax payable by the person in the tax period in which the goods were entered for home
consumption (Section 11 (9) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014). So, when the importer defers
payment of input tax on importation, the amount must be shown in the current tax return, the
VAT applicable both as a VAT liability (as output taxe because are not paid) and, tax credit
(input tax deduction). So where the importer is entitled to 100 percent, the input tax credit
reported as a liability will be completely offset by the corresponding input tax credit
(Regulation 8 of Value Added Tax Regulation (General) 2015).
Taxable person who import capital goods may be given deferral of payment of value added
tax for 10 years. (Section 11 (11) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014; Regulation 7 of Value
Added Tax Regulation (General) 2015). The Commissioner General approves an application
of the deferral of payment of value added tax when satisfied that-
The decisions applications for deferment are made within fourteen (14) days of receiving the
application, notify the applicant of the decision to approve or reject the application, and when
the applications for the deferments are rejected the Commissioner General states the reasons
for such rejection, and afford the applicant the right to object and appeal against the
decision (Section 11 (6) of the Value Added Tax Act 2014).
However, the deferment ceases to have effect and the value added tax becomes due and
payable as if the deferment had not been granted if the applicant fails to account for deferral
import value added tax, the said goods are transferred, sold or otherwise disposed-off in any
way to another person not entitled to enjoy similar privileges. Moreover, this deferment may
be cancelled when: the person no longer meets the requirements for approval, the security
provided by the person has expired; or the person becomes liable to fines or penalties, or is
prosecuted for or convicted, under any other tax law (Section 11 (9) of the Value Added Tax
Act 2014). Moreover, when the period of deferment lapses, the deferred taxes on capital goods
is not payable (Regulation 9 of Value Added Tax Regulation (General) 2015). Thus, the
deferment of value added tax on capital goods intends to encourage long terms investments.
5.10.1 Interest for failure to pay tax on due date (section 76 of the Tax
Administration Act 2015)
All taxes must be paid on due dates which is on or before the last working day of the month
following the month of transaction. Late payment of tax is liable for interest for each month or
part of a month for which any of the tax is outstanding calculated at the statutory rate
compounded monthly, applied to the amount outstanding at the start of the period (Section
76(1) of the Tax Administration Act 2015).
Example 7
Tanzania prime product ltd, had estimated value added tax payable of Tshs 8,000,000 in March
2015. Which was paid on 1st July 2015.
Required
Determine the interest for failure to pay tax on due date if the statutory rate is 12% per annum.
Solution
(a) fails to apply for registration as required under the Value Added Tax Act;
(b) fails to notify the Commissioner General of ceasing to be liable for value added tax as
required under the Value Added Tax Act;
(c) fails to notify the Commissioner General of a change in circumstances as required under
the Value Added Tax Act;
(d) Fails to notify the Commissioner General the change in interest or ownership of
property or control of business by reason of death, bankruptcy, winding-up or other
legal process that vests in another person interest or ownership of property as required
under the Value Added Tax.
(e) fails to notify the Commissioner General of a transfer as required under the Value
Added Tax Act; or
(f) Holds himself out as a taxable person under the Value Added Tax Act, where that
person is not.
The person who commits an offence among these are liable, on conviction:
(a) where the failure or holding out is made knowingly or recklessly, to a fine of not less
than 100 currency points and not more than 200 currency points or imprisonment for a
term of not less than one year and not more than two years, or to both; or
(b) in any other case, to a fine of not less than 50 currency points and not more than 100
currency points or imprisonment for a term of not less than one month and not more than
three months, or to both.
In situation of multiple tax rates or supplies misclassification of goods and services might
reduce or eliminate tax liability. For example, VAT is completely evaded is the goods is
classified as zero rated or exempt supplies.
Taxable persons can collect VAT from customers and fail to remit them to Tanzania Revenue
Authority. In that case the person will be stealing both from customers and Tanzania Revenue
Authority.
Use of fake electronic receipt is said to be very common way of evading VAT. The fake
electronic fiscal receipts might be issued to customers showing the amount collected thereafter,
the person records lower amount in another electronic fiscal device. The uses of audit trail that
cross check electronic fiscal receipts of suppliers and purchasers may reduce this problem but
only mostly to registered person.
Not all input taxes are deductible. Claiming input taxes on private goods, some of business
entertainment, purchase of motor car and exempt input tax is tax evasion. Legal all these input
tax are not deductible.
Summary
This chapter focused on VAT administration. It explained the VAT assessments, VAT
accounts, corrections of errors and VAT returns. It further talked about penalties and
interest for tax noncompliance, VAT tax evasion, VAT tax avoidance and how to deals
with tax noncompliance. Finally, it discussed the procedures and challenges brought by
VAT refunds.
Exercises
Question 1
In order to promote both local and foreign investment in Tanzania the Government has enacted
the Tanzania investment Act, 1997.
Required
(a) Are fiscal and tax incentives really necessary in the investment decision making process?
( CPA (T) May 1999)
(b) Specify two incentives under the VAT Act 1997 ( CPA (T) May 1999)
(c) Define and distinguish between tax avoidance and tax evasion (CPA (T) May 2001)
(d) Discuss three main causes of VAT tax avoidance and evasion and suggest appropriate ways
and means to minimize them. (CPA (T) May 2001)
Question 2
The VAT system involves refunds of input taxes however there is a risk of false claims and
deductions.
Required
Question 3
a) Value Added Tax (VAT) refers generally to a tax charged on value added on goods and
services at various stages of business transactions.
Required
(a) Mwendapole Co. Ltd. deals with garments and was registered for VAT since July, 2003.
The company accurately lodged the respective VAT returns up to October 2004.
However, the returns for November 2004 to April to April 2005 were all submitted on 1st
May 2005. The VAT due for each month were as follows:
Month Amount in Tshs
November, 2004 400,000
December, 2004 800,000
January, 2005 500,000
February, 2005 Nil
March, 2005 600,000
Required
Question 4
Mr. Alvin is the owner of ABC Co. Ltd. a VAT registered Company with VRN 27J and TIN
0032H that deals with purchasing and selling different articles locally and overseas. The
following purchases and expenses were made during the month of March, 2005
1) Imported human medicines containing antibiotics that have been approved by
the Minister for Finance and recommended by the Tanzania Food and Drugs
Authority for Tshs. 1.5 million C.I.F value.
2) Purchased Journals and Newspapers to be used by the International Academy
owned by him for Tshs. 350,000/= and Tshs. 300,000/= respectively.
3) Acquired residential building for Tshs. 3.5 million that has to be used for the
similar purposes.
4) Imported an “automatic” Toyota Mark II for Tshs. 8 million to be used by the
disabled employees of his Company free of charge.
5) An International NGO has provided the business a subsidy of Tshs. 20 million,
two quarters (2/4) which represent CIF value has been used to purchase one
minibus for official use and one quarter (1/4) for the purchase of computers and
printers.
6) Paid Tshs. 1.7 million as park fee in respect of the tourists that have commercial
interest with the Company in the United Kingdom.
7) Mr. Alvin is also a Sub-Contractor of the Project under the International Donor
Agencies a relieved entity under the Third Schedule of the VAT Act, 1997. He
therefore purchased motor vehicle for the project in his name for Tshs. 25
million CIF Value. Form VAT 220A has not been filed for that purposes.
8) Paid electricity Tshs. 750,000/=, telephone bills Tshs. 250,000/=, and owned
refrigerators for official use of Tshs. 450,000/=.
9) Given sanitary pads worth Tshs. 560,000/= by one of the NGOs to be allocated
to employees of the Company.
In the same period, the following supplies were made:
Items Tshs.
Cooking Oil 600,000/=
Beer and Spirits in one of his Groceries 290,000/=
Soft Drinks (supplied free to employees) 750,000/=
Fresh Milk 400,000/=
Transportation of Goods 360,000/=
Toilet Soap 890,000/=
Mosquito Coils 700,000/=
The following additional information is also available:
(i) There was an opening stock of Tshs. 3,290,000/= which is the closing stock for
the month of February 2005.
(ii) Crates of beer worth Tshs. 180,000/= was taken for personal consumption in the
Extra-Ordinary meeting of the Company. The amount was not included as part
of stock in the month of February.
(iii) No cash discount was given during the month.
(iv) All values are VAT inclusive except imports.
Required
By using the Second Method of apportionment, compute input tax to be claimed or credited
during the month of March 2005.
(Note: The importation is subject to 25% import duty, 10% excise duty and 18 % VAT and
ignores the issue of depreciation.) (CPA (T) November 2005)
Question 5
(a) Write short notes on the following categories of untaxed goods and services:
(i) Zero rated
(ii) Exempt
(iii) Special relief
(iv) Outside the scope
(v) Partially exempt
(b) The operation of VAT system depends very much on declaration made by VAT
registered person that is done on monthly basis. To ensure compliance from registered
taxpayers, the VAT law does provide punitive measures for the person who does not
comply with the law.
Required
What are the measures are taken against a person who fails to submit a return or pay tax within
the time allowed under the law?
(c) Compute penalty and interest and final liability from the given information that ABC
is a registered taxpayer that did submit a return for June 2005 on 30th October, 2005 with the
payment of Tshs. 650,000 as VAT payable. The prevailing rate of interest was 10%.
(CPA (T) November 2007)
Question 6
Shimbo Ltd commenced trading as a wholesaler and retailer of electronic sound equipment and
music systems on 1 July, 2006. The company registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) on 1
March 2007. Its inputs for each of the months of July 2006 to February 2007 are as follows:
During February 2007, Shimbo Ltd sold all of the fixed assets purchased during October 2006
for Tshs. 12,000,000. On 1 March 2007, Tshs. 92,000,000 of the goods purchased were still
in stock under FIFO Method. The above figures are all exclusive of VAT. Shimbo Ltd’s sales
are all standard rated and all inputs are also taxable.
Shimbo Ltd pays all of its input tax one month after receiving the purchase invoice. However,
many customers are not paying Shimbo Ltd until four months after the date of the sales invoice.
In addition, several customers have recently defaulted on the payment of their debts. In order
to encourage more prompt payment, Shimbo Ltd is considering offering all of its customers a
5% discount if they pay within one month of the date of the sales invoice.
Required
(i) Explain whether and how much Shimbo Ltd. Was able to recover input VAT in respect
of input incurred prior to registration for VAT on 1 March, 2007.
(ii) Explain the VAT implications of Shimbo Ltd. Offering its customers a 5% discount for
prompt payment. (CPA (T) November 2007)
Question 7
The figures provided below were extracted from the cashbook of the VAT registered trader for
the month of August 2006.
Required
From the information provided above, as an Auditor, calculate the amount of VAT due to TRA
or due to be refunded to the trader. Assume 18% VAT rate.