Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Management at Universities: The Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator at Work 1st ed. Edition Poul Erik Mouritzen full chapter instant download
Performance Management at Universities: The Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator at Work 1st ed. Edition Poul Erik Mouritzen full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-handbook-of-mentoring-at-work-
theory-research-and-practice-1st-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/evaluating-campus-climate-at-us-
research-universities-opportunities-for-diversity-and-
inclusion-1st-ed-edition-krista-m-soria/
https://ebookmass.com/product/organizational-behavior-human-
behavior-at-work-human-behavior-at-work-14th-edition-ebook-pdf-
version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-palgrave-handbook-of-
creativity-at-work-1st-ed-edition-lee-martin/
The Paramedic at Work: A Sociology of a New Profession
Leo Mccann
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-paramedic-at-work-a-sociology-
of-a-new-profession-leo-mccann/
https://ebookmass.com/product/database-performance-at-scale-a-
practical-guide-1st-edition-felipe-cardeneti-mendes/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-palgrave-handbook-of-
disability-at-work-sandra-fielden/
https://ebookmass.com/product/mastering-communication-at-
work-2nd-edition-ethan-f-becker/
https://ebookmass.com/product/everyday-gender-at-work-in-
taiwan-1st-edition-ting-fang-chin-auth/
PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS
Performance Management
at Universities
The Danish Bibliometric Research
Indicator at Work
Series Editors
B. Guy Peters
Department of Political Science
Pittsburgh University
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Geert Bouckaert
Public Management Institute
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
Organizations are the building blocks of governments. The role of
organizations, formal and informal, is most readily apparent in public
bureaucracy, but all the institutions of the public sector are comprised of
organizations, or have some organizational characteristics that affect their
performance. Therefore, if scholars want to understand how governments
work, a very good place to start is at the level of organizations involved
in delivering services. Likewise, if practitioners want to understand how
to be effective in the public sector, they would be well-advised to con-
sider examining the role of organizations and how to make organizations
more effective. This series publishes research-based books concerned with
organizations in the public sector and covers such issues as: the autonomy
of public sector organizations; networks and network analysis; bureau-
cratic politics; organizational change and leadership; and methodology
for studying organizations.
Performance
Management
at Universities
The Danish Bibliometric Research
Indicator at Work
Poul Erik Mouritzen Niels Opstrup
Department of Political Science Department of Political Science
Aarhus University and Public Management
Aarhus, Denmark University of Southern Denmark
Odense, Denmark
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and
information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied,
with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
This book is dedicated to Sebastian, Bertram, David, Miriam and Rebecca.
Preface
vii
viii Preface
considerably and now form part of Chapter 5. Almost all other chapters
have been rewritten, and new analyses have been added. Some sections
of the book are translated directly, such as the empirical analyses of mis-
representation (or ‘gaming’) in Chapter 5.
The book is the product of almost nine years of research. The project
started in 2010, and the last interviews were conducted in 2017 while
some of the hard data were collected in late 2018. During that period,
we were rather hesitant to publish results since too much public debate
could influence our main sources, namely the many scholars and univer-
sity leaders who willingly set aside time to complete our questionnaires
and participate in interviews. In the course of this long project, many
people were involved as research assistants. We wish to thank all of them
for their invaluable work throughout.
Professors Peter Munk Christiansen and Jørgen Søndergaard gave
valuable comments on the first book. Our colleague Professor Jesper
Schneider has been an invaluable advisor throughout the project and
kindly supplied us with the data and analyses presented in Chapter 13.
A special thanks should be given to our co-author on the Danish book,
Pernille Bak Pedersen, who contributed tremendously to that manuscript.
We are thankful to the members of our advisory board, Professors
Margit Osterloh, Barry Bozeman, Ivar Bleiklie, Bruno S. Frey and Paul
Wouters. Since its establishment, we have held four meetings with the
board in addition to several one-to-one meetings.
We also want to give a special thanks to academic editor Kate Thulin,
who did a painstaking and wonderful job copy editing the manuscript.
Finally, we thank the two foundations which made the research pos-
sible. A large grant from The Velux Foundation financed most of the
expenses of the project while The Carlsberg Foundation supported the
project with a two-year postdoctoral fellowship.
Reference
Mouritzen, Poul Erik, Niels Opstrup, and Pernille Bak Pedersen. 2018. En fremmed
kommer til byen. Ti år med den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Odense:
Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Contents
Part I Introduction
ix
x Contents
Part IV Conclusions
Literature 283
List of Figures
Fig. 1.1 University revenues from 2007 to 2016 (fixed prices, 2016
level, million Euro) 11
Fig. 2.1 Analytical scheme 25
Fig. 3.1 Soft and hard implementation at universities
and in the main fields of science 2015 (0–100 scale) 46
Fig. 3.2 Implementation at universities and main fields of science
2011 and 2015 (0–100 scale) 51
Fig. 3.3 Implementation at departments and universities 2011
and 2015 (0–100 scale) 53
Fig. 5.1 Level of implementation and problematic contributions
2015 (faculty level) 94
Fig. 6.1 Distribution of articles by Danish researchers by number
of pages, 2009 and 2015 121
Fig. 11.1 Development in BRI points, research personnel
and productivity from 2009 to 2015 (index) 207
Fig. 11.2 Development in productivity at the universities,
2009–2015 (index) 208
Fig. 12.1 Share of Level 2 points 2010–2016 (per cent) 221
Fig. 13.1 Growth in number of WoS articles for the world, OECD,
Denmark and Norway from 1990 to 2016 (3-year averages) 233
Fig. 13.2 Citations per article, selected countries, 1990–2016
(MNCS, 3-year averages) 235
Fig. 13.3 Profiles of Danish WoS articles according to mean
normalized journal score, 2001–2016 (per cent of articles
in five classes, 3-year averages) 237
xi
xii List of Figures
Fig. 13.4 Citations per article for each university and the country
as a whole, 2006–2008 to 2014–2016 (MNCS) 238
Fig. 13.5 Proportion of articles belonging to the top 10% most
frequently cited 2006–2008 to 2014–2016 (per cent) 240
List of Tables
xiii
xiv List of Tables
Table 12.4 Share of BRI points and contributions and BRI points per
contribution by language and main field, 2009 and 2015 224
Table 12.5 Share of BRI points and contributions based on collabora-
tion by main scientific field, 2009 and 2015 (per cent) 225
Table 13.1 Rank based on top 1% and top 10% publications,
2006–2009 to 2013–2016 (Leiden Ranking) 241
List of Boxes
xvii
PART I
Introduction
CHAPTER 1
Contents
The Prime Minister Goes to China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
The International Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Goals and Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
The National Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Streamlining Management and Consolidation of Universities . . . . . . . . 9
Increased Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Increased Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
The Universities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Main Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Strength of the Incentive System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Structure of the Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1. The egg may be laid outside a larva, and the embryonic and larval
developments may both be passed on the exterior.
2. The egg may be laid and the embryonic development passed
through, outside the host, but the parasite on hatching may enter the
host, so that the post-embryonic development is passed in the lymph
of the host.
3. The egg may be laid inside the host, both embryonic and post-
embryonic developments being gone through in the fluids of the
host.
4. The egg may be laid inside another egg, the embryonic and post-
embryonic developments being passed therein.
We shall find that all these conditions exist in the Insects we are
about to consider.
Fam. I. Cynipidae—Gall-flies.
Wings with very few cells, with no dark patch (stigma) on the
anterior margin; pronotum fixed to the mesonotum, and at each
side extending back to the point of insertion of the front wing.
Antennae not elbowed but straight, composed of a moderate
number (12-15) of joints. Early stages passed either in galls or
as parasites in the bodies of other Insects.
The wings frequently bear fine hairs; the paucity of nervures and the
absence of the "stigma" are of importance in the definition of the
family. The most important of the cells is one called the radial cell,
situate just beyond the middle of the front part of the wing.
The exact mode in which the egg is brought to the requisite spot in
the plant is still uncertain. The path traversed by the ovipositor in the
plant is sometimes of considerable length, and far from straight; in
some cases before it actually pierces the tissues, the organ is thrust
between scales or through fissures, so that the terebra, or boring
part of the ovipositor, when it reaches the minute seam of cambium,
is variously curved and flexed. Now as the canal in its interior is of
extreme tenuity, and frequently of great length, it must be a very
difficult matter for the egg to reach the tissue where it should
develop. The eggs of Cynipidae are very remarkable bodies; they
are very ductile, and consist of a head, and of a stalk that in some
cases is five or six times as long as the head, and is itself somewhat
enlarged at the opposite end. Some other Hymenoptera have also
stalked eggs of a similar kind (Fig. 357, A, egg of Leucospis). It has
been thought that this remarkable shape permits of the contents of
the egg being transferred for a time to the narrower parts, and thus
allows the broader portion of the egg to be temporarily compressed,
and the whole structure to be passed through a very narrow canal or
orifice. It is, however, very doubtful whether the egg really passes
along the canal of the borer. Hartig thought that it did so, and Riley
supports this view to a limited extent. Adler, however, is of a different
opinion, and considers that the egg travels in larger part outside the
terebra. It should be remembered that the ovipositor is really
composed of several appendages that are developed from the
outside of the body; thus the external orifice of the body is
morphologically at the base of the borer, the several parts of which
are in longitudinal apposition. Hence there is nothing that would
render the view of the egg leaving the ovipositor at the base
improbable, and Adler supposes that it actually does so, the thin end
being retained between the divisions of the terebra. Riley is of
opinion that the act of oviposition in these Insects follows no uniform
system. He has observed that in the case of Callirhytis clavula,
ovipositing in the buds of Quercus alba, the eggs are inserted by the
egg-stalk into the substance of the leaf, and that the egg-fluids are at
first gathered in the posterior end, which is not inserted. "The fluids
are then gradually absorbed from this exposed portion into the
inserted portion of the egg, and by the time the young leaves have
formed the exposed [parts of the] shells are empty, the thread-like
stalk has disappeared, and the egg-contents are all contained within
the leaf tissue." He has also observed that in Biorhiza nigra the
pedicel, or stalk, only is inserted in the embryonic leaf-tissue, and
that the enlarged portion or egg-body is at first external. The same
naturalist also records that in the case of a small inquiline species,
Ceroptres politus, the pedicel of the egg is very short, and in this
case the egg is thrust down into the puncture made by the borer, so
that the egg is entirely covered.
Some Cynipidae bore a large number of the channels for their eggs
before depositing any of the latter, and it would appear that it is the
rule that the boring of the channel is an act separate from that of
actual oviposition. Adler distinguishes three stages: (1) boring of the
canal; (2) the passage of the egg from the base of the ovipositor,
where the egg-stalk is pinched between the two spiculae and the
egg is pushed along the ovipositor; (3) after the point of the
ovipositor is withdrawn, the egg-body enters the pierced canal, and
is pushed forward by the ovipositor until it reaches the bottom.[436]
About fifty years ago Hartig reared large numbers of certain species
of gall-flies from their galls, obtaining from 28,000 galls of Cynips
disticha about 10,000 flies, and from galls of C. folii 3000 or 4000
examples of this species; he found that all the individuals were
females. His observations were subsequently abundantly confirmed
by other naturalists, among whom we may mention Frederick Smith
in our own country, who made in vain repeated attempts to obtain
males of the species of the genus Cynips. On one occasion he
collected in the South of England 4410 galls of C. kollari (at that time
called C. lignicola), and from these he obtained 1562 flies, all of
which were females. A second effort was attended with similar
results. Hartig, writing in 1843, after many years' experience, stated
that though he was acquainted with twenty-eight species of the
genus Cynips, he had not seen a male of any one of them. During
the course of these futile attempts it was, however, seen that a
possible source of fallacy existed in the fact that the Insects were
reared from collected galls; and these being similar to one another, it
was possible that the males might inhabit some different gall. Adler
endeavoured to put the questions thus raised to the test by means of
rearing females from galls, and then getting these females to
produce, parthenogenetically, galls on small oaks planted in pots,
and thus completely under control. He was quite successful in
carrying out his project, and in doing so he made a most
extraordinary discovery, viz. that the galls produced by these
parthenogenetic females on his potted oaks, were quite different
from the galls from which the flies themselves were reared, and
were, in fact, galls that gave rise to a fly that had been previously
considered a distinct species; and of this form both sexes were
produced. Adler's observations have been confirmed by other
naturalists, and thus the occurrence of alternation of generations,
one of the two generations being parthenogenetic, has been
thoroughly established in Cynipidae. We may mention one case as
illustrative. A gall-fly called Chilaspis lowii is produced from galls on
oak-leaves at Vienna at the end of April, both sexes occurring. The
female thereafter lays eggs on the ribs of the leaves of the same
kind of oak, and thus produces a different gall from that which
nourished herself. These galls fall off with the leaves in the autumn,
and in July or August of the following year a gall-fly is produced from
them. It is a different creature from the mother, and was previously
known to entomologists under the name of Chilaspis nitida. Only
females of it occur, and these parthenogenetic individuals lay their
eggs in the young buds of the oak that are already present in the
autumn, and in the following spring, when the buds open and the
leaves develop, those that have had an egg laid in them produce a
gall from which Chilaspis lowii emerges in April or May. In this case
therefore the cycle of the two generations extends over two years,
the generation that takes the greater part of the time for its
production consisting only of females. Adler's observations showed
that, though in some species this alternation of generations was
accompanied by parthenogenesis in one part of the cycle, yet in
other species this was not the case. He found, for instance, that
some gall-flies of the genus Aphilothrix produced a series of
generations the individuals of which were similar to one another, and
were all females and parthenogenetic. In some species of the old
genus Cynips no males are even yet known to occur. A very curious
observation was made by the American, Walsh, viz. that of galls
gathered by him quite similar to one another, some produced
speedily a number of both sexes of Cynips spongifica, while much
later on in the season the remainder of the galls gave rise to females
only of an Insect called Cynips aciculata. It is believed that the galls
gathered by Walsh[437] were really all one species; so that parts of
the same generation emerge at different times and in two distinct
forms, one of them parthenogenetic, the other consisting of two
sexes. It has, however, been suggested that Cynips spongifica and
C. aciculata may be two distinct species, producing quite similar
galls.
Bassett recorded the first case of the kind in connexion with a North
American species, Cynips (Ceroptres) quercus-arbos Fitch. He says:
"On the first of June galls on Quercus ilicifolia had reached their full
size, but were still tender, quite like the young shoots of which they
formed part. Examining them on that day, I discovered on them two
gall-flies, which I succeeded in taking. They were females, and the
ovipositor of each was inserted into the gall so deeply that they could
not readily free themselves, and they were removed by force."
The great resemblance of the inquiline gall-fly to the fly that makes
the gall both dwell in, has been several times noticed by Osten
Sacken, who says "one of the most curious circumstances
connected with the history of two North American blackberry galls is,
that besides the Diastrophus, which apparently is the genuine
originator of the gall, they produce another gall-fly, no doubt an
inquiline, belonging to the genus Aulax, and showing the most
striking resemblance in size, colouring, and sculpture to the
Diastrophus, their companion. The one is the very counterpart of the
other, hardly showing any differences, except the strictly generic
characters! This seems to be one of those curious instances, so
frequent in entomology, of the resemblance between parasites and
their hosts! By rearing a considerable number of galls of D.
nebulosus I obtained this species as well as its parasite almost in
equal numbers. By cutting some of the galls open I ascertained that
a single specimen of the gall frequently contained both species, thus
setting aside a possible doubt whether these Insects are not
produced by two different, although closely similar galls."[438]
Not more than 500 species of Psenides and Inquiline Cynipidae are
known from all parts of the world; and of described Parasitic
Cynipidae there are only about 150 species. The British forms have
recently been treated by Cameron in the work we have already
several times referred to.[439]