Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture Jason Lustig file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture Jason Lustig file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/organized-time-rhythm-tonality-and-
form-jason-yust/
https://ebookmass.com/product/stability-control-and-application-
of-time-delay-systems-gao/
https://ebookmass.com/product/letting-go-of-laziness-7-habits-to-
control-your-time-boost-productivity-and-avoid-procrastinating-
ward/
https://ebookmass.com/product/academic-archives-managing-the-
next-generation-of-college-and-university-archives-records-and-
special-collections-ebook-pdf-version/
Game of Thrones - A View from the Humanities Vol. 1:
Time, Space and Culture Alfonso Álvarez-Ossorio
https://ebookmass.com/product/game-of-thrones-a-view-from-the-
humanities-vol-1-time-space-and-culture-alfonso-alvarez-ossorio/
https://ebookmass.com/product/archives-in-the-digital-age-
preservation-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten-abderrazak-mkadmi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-hebrew-bible-a-contemporary-
introduction-to-the-christian-old-testament-and-the-jewish-
tanakh-david-m-carr/
https://ebookmass.com/product/paul-and-the-resurrection-of-
israel-jews-former-gentiles-israelites-jason-a-staples/
https://ebookmass.com/product/global-practices-on-road-traffic-
signal-control-fixed-time-control-at-isolated-intersections-
keshuang-tang/
A Time to Gather
THE OXFORD SERIES ON HISTORY AND ARCHIVES
General Editors:
Francis X. Blouin Jr. and William G. Rosenberg,
University of Michigan
JA S O N LU S T IG
1
3
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197563526.001.0001
1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed by Integrated Books International, United States of America
Contents
Acknowledgments vii
Introduction 1
1. Archival Totality in the Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden 20
2. Ingathering the Exiles of the Past? Bringing Archives
to Jerusalem 52
3. An Archive of Diaspora at the “Jerusalem on the Ohio” 85
4. Making the Past into History: Jewish Archives and Postwar
Germany 116
5. Digitization, Virtual Collections, and Total Archives in the
Twenty-First Century 148
Conclusion 174
Notes 181
Bibliography 235
Index 261
Acknowledgments
This book is grounded in the principle that the study of the past is only
possible with the support of those in the present. It is true about histor-
ical research at large, which is built upon the tireless work of archivists and
librarians, both those of generations past who gathered and preserved histor-
ical material and those who continue to make sources accessible today. And
it is especially true for a book like this one, which over the years has been sus-
tained through a community of colleagues, mentors, friends, and loved ones
to whom I must offer my sincere gratitude.
This book began in my years at UCLA, where David N. Myers provided
constant support and guidance. David’s teaching was not just about Jewish
history itself. He also modeled what it means to be a historian and why what
we do matters, which has helped shape me into the kind of scholar I aspire to
be. Sarah Abrevaya Stein, Todd Presner, and David Sabean, along with many
others, also opened innumerable intellectual doors and pathways. Moreover,
I must express thanks to my teachers through the years who nurtured my
passion for Jewish studies, especially Eugene Sheppard and Jonathan Sarna.
A book like this one would have been impossible to write without research
support and fellowships from institutions that have believed in me and this
project. The Institute of European Studies at the University of California,
Berkeley, provided a fellowship that, together with the Elka Klein Memorial
Grant, underwrote my first research trips to Germany. Fellowships from
American Jewish Archives in 2012 and the Leo Baeck Institute and the YIVO
Institute for Jewish Research in 2013 brought me to Cincinnati and New York.
The Association for Jewish Studies’ Dissertation Completion Fellowship, a
Harry Starr fellowship at Harvard’s Center for Jewish Studies, and the Leo
Baeck Institute’s Gerald Westheimer Early Career Fellowship afforded me
opportunities to revise my dissertation and complete the book manuscript.
And I have been lucky to land at the University of Texas at Austin, where the
Schusterman Center for Jewish Studies has been a wonderful intellectual and
institutional home, which together with the Israel Institute has enabled me
to bring this work to fruition. In addition, the publication of this book has
viii Acknowledgments
Renton, Megan Raby, David Sclar, and David Stern, among countless others.
Michael Silber, Michael A. Meyer, Jason Kalman, Ben Outwaithe, and Roni
Shweka also have provided useful primary sources and secondary materials.
I am also grateful to my editor at Oxford University Press, Nancy Toff, who
championed the project and has helped shepherd it. Additionally, I should
thank Francis Blouin and William Rosenberg who, as academic editors of
the series, worked closely with me as I developed the book, read numerous
drafts, and offered their thoughtful comments. Further, I would like to ex-
press my appreciation to Suganya Elango and the whole production staff, and
also to Joseph Stuart for developing the index.
Finally, I must thank my wife and partner, Adra Lustig, who agreed to up-
root our lives and take on a peripatetic existence, when for years we did not
remain in the same place for more than a few months at a time. As I sit here
typing late at night, I am reminded of the sacrifices you have made over the
years, and I am ever grateful for the trust you’ve placed in me that in the end
it will have been worthwhile. Our daughters, Sylvie and Eleanor, who were
born in the midst of this project, have also grown as the book has come into
focus. Every day with them has been a blessing. It is to Sylvie and Eleanor that
I dedicate A Time to Gather: This book is about those who devoted their lives
and energies to preserving in some manner Jewish culture so that it might
be passed down from generation to generation—a task that, as I look to you,
I know is not in vain.
Introduction
In August 1945, Judah Magnes, the San Francisco-born rabbi and pres-
ident of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, asked the American mili-
tary to transfer to Jerusalem the historical files of the Jewish communities
of Italy. When Cecil Roth, the Cambridge historian of Italian Jewry, heard
of the plan, he wrote irately: “This is clearly a Time to Gather, not the re-
verse.”1 The sentiment highlights a red thread through twentieth-century
Jewish culture, an imperative to summon the forces of Jewish life, alongside
its fundamental contentiousness that one person’s gathering was another’s
scattering, or even looting. These impulses attained heightened urgency after
the Holocaust, when Jewish leaders looked to gather scattered survivors and
cultural remnants. It was a time to gather, a feverish era of collecting—and
conflict—when Jews turned to archives as sources of history, anchors of
memory, and arbiters of “authentic” Jewish history and culture. It was a time
when Jews around the world looked to preserve links with the past, pursuing
diverse archive projects and harboring dreams of total archives comprehen-
sively documenting Jewish life. And it was a time of struggle, when archival
centralization became one means of asserting dominance over Jewish life. In
such a time to gather, archives were powerful but contested symbols of con-
trol not just of the past but also of the present and future.
Jews’ archives became sites of struggle precisely because holding histor-
ical records stood for wide-ranging battles over the control of Jewish culture.
In fact, archives offer one organizing principle of modern Jewish life. They
constitute a concrete attempt to hold tight to the past in times of fast and far-
reaching change, and manifest a broader sensibility of gathering together the
scattered sources and resources of Jewish life, with archives offering a means
to rebuild and reconfigure Jewish life by bringing order to the past. The
power of archives in modern Jewish cultures drew from a deep well within
the Jewish tradition, and it also reflected the specific challenges and opportu-
nities of modern Jewish life: Piecing together the fragments of Jewish culture
held dynamic symbolism within Judaism, whether one looks to the image of
the fragments of the tablets of the Law, fractured by Moses, or the core notion
A Time to Gather. Jason Lustig, Oxford University Press. © Oxford University Press 2022.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197563526.003.0001
2 A Time To Gather
of Lurianic Kabbalah, the mystical idea of the scattering of the shards of the
universe and their reconstruction through tikkun ‘olam; the dispersion and
gathering of documents thus both resonated with the Jews’ long diasporic
history and also recent ruptures, which only heightened the impulse to bring
together the materials of Jewish history. In a century marked by the destruc-
tion of European Jewry and the rise of new cultural centers in the United
States and Israel/Palestine, the twinned reality of the written word—which,
as Bruno Latour noted, is simultaneously immutable and mobile—meant
archives presented a possibility to both link the past to the present and also
resituate it in new and sometimes surprising contexts.2 Consequently, ar-
chive making allowed for the recombination and relocation of the fragments
of history in the aftermath of destruction.
A Time to Gather excavates archives as battlegrounds over control of
Jewish culture from the turn of the twentieth century to the cusp of the dig-
ital era. It centers on a trio of monumental repositories—the Gesamtarchiv
der deutschen Juden, the central Jewish archive formed in Berlin in 1903, to-
gether with Jerusalem’s Jewish Historical General Archives and the American
Jewish Archives in Cincinnati, both opened to the public in 1947—to show-
case continual struggles over who might “own” the Jewish past. Both before
the Holocaust and especially in its aftermath, gathering archives desig-
nated cultural dominance by offering concrete evidence of ties to the past
and lending a sort of legitimization to communal life. Israel’s claims to be a
successor to European Jewry, the reality of American Jewry’s rising prom-
inence, and the question of the viability of Jewish life in Germany after
1945—in all these cases, possessing records represented a kind of “authen-
ticity” by holding on to history when what was to come was not at all cer-
tain. In other words, archives were about more than the past. Just as records
served as an arbiter of personal identity, repositories could establish identity
on a larger scale and even offer “birth certificates” for entire communities.
They marked epicenters of cultural hegemony and had the practical effect of
determining who might tell and house the story of the Jews. Such debates,
however, were not limited to the immediate post-Holocaust years. In fact,
archives have continually been a contested canvas upon which to inscribe
assumptions about the past and aspirations for the future. It was true in the
1980s and 1990s, when creating archives in Germany reflected the continu-
ation of Jewish life there. And it remains true even with digitization, which
might seem to resolve struggles over physical records but actually magnifies
the tantalizing fantasy of reassembling collections scattered by the winds of
Introduction 3
history, like the Cairo Genizah, as gathering historical materials stands for
the wider effort to piece together Jewish life. In the end, this history reveals
that archival struggle is not over. Instead, dreams of monumental archives
are continually amplified by the possibilities of such a time to gather.
This book emphasizes the active role of actually existing archive reposi-
tories and institutions, as opposed to “the Archive” as a construct of theory.3
It channels attention on ambitious total archive initiatives that sought to
centralize and take control of Jewish communal records, whose leaders spe-
cifically framed their activities as “archives.” But instead of a collection of in-
dividual archive stories, it offers a cohesive history that charts the functions
archives have played in Jewish life, their relation to the wider history of
archives, and the place of archives in structuring power dynamics and cul-
tural hegemonies, by arguing that archives can be sites of power for the pow-
erless while remaining sites of cultural domination.
Twentieth-century Jewish archiving underlines how archives are not neu-
tral oases of “objectivity” but instead are highly political sites. In creating
archives, Jews sought to take hold of their own history, offering illustrations
of what archival scholars have termed community-based archives, the en-
deavor to actively collect materials under the direct jurisdiction and man-
agement of communities who can thereby control their own history and
cultural heritage.4 This process, crucially, illustrates tensions between Jews’
aspirations for archives of their own and the reality that placing materials
under professional management often went hand in hand with their removal
from local control. Moreover, even after Jews received restitutable archives,
for instance, the matter of which groups, institutions, or locales should get
them was highly contested. The book thus underlines the consequence of
archives’ archival nature, which is not just an intellectual issue but also holds
real-world repercussions.
For Jews, archives offered one avenue to reshape Jewish life in their own
image. Archives—both records themselves and the institutions that hold
them—are thus not merely the results of history but are also active shapers
of the human landscape. The turn toward archive making and the struggles
over who might have them reflected a growing importance of archives and
the urgency of archival memory, both within Jewish culture and beyond it.
And what is more, this story about monumental archives and the struggles
that surrounded them channels our focus toward big data and its stakes prior
to the digital age: The impulse to gather, and to gather everything, gestures
at a genealogy of information totality and the power of knowledge—not just
4 A Time To Gather
to know but to “own” and control. Altogether, archival conflicts raise com-
plex questions about who could or should “own” history, thereby demon-
strating how Jews’ archival initiatives mirrored a claim that these scholars,
institutions, and communities owned not only the objects themselves but
also the history they represented.
The drive to secure the historical record of Jewish life and the struggles
over who should hold it reflected a turn to archives in Jewish culture, as
Jews increasingly viewed archives as valuable resources worth fighting
for. This turn to archives closely parallels the turn to history in modern
Judaism, when historical thinking became a baseline for communal and
individual standards of leadership and life.5 In modern times, many
Jews increasingly viewed religion and culture through a historical lens,
comprehending historical change that opened the horizons of cultural,
political, and religious transformation. Likewise, archives offered a
way to engage with tremendous change by protecting what many feared
was being lost, as Jews placed great value in physical objects as reposi-
tories of personal memory and communal identity. It is reminiscent of
Pierre Nora’s insight: Describing a deterioration of communal memory
supported by shared social contexts, Nora remarked that “modern
memory is, above all, archival.”6 In other words, memory is maintained
through preserved documentation, not lived experience. The twentieth-
century traumas that tore asunder the chain of Jewish life thus fostered
a dependence on recorded truth and an instinct to halt time’s arrow;
archives served as sites of Jewish memory that both preserved historical
sources and offered a way to link the generations in the face of history’s
elemental discontinuity. In one manifestation, we might chart this sensi-
bility from German Jewish leaders’ turn-of-the-century sense of the ero-
sion of provincial communities to the tragic destruction of Jewish life
in Europe. Given these other upheavals in modern Jewish life, collecting
offered a salve for a vanishing past, and archives could embody identity
on a communal level. If documents serve as prostheses for individuals’
memory, as Jacques Derrida reflected, then collecting and documenting
history could replace lost limbs of the body politic.7 In this respect, the
Introduction 5
turn to archives, and the value Jews assigned to them as part of it, set the
table for pitched battles over their control.
Archive making is, of course, not an exclusively modern phenomenon in
Jewish history. The sixth-century Babylonian Talmud prohibited Jews from
destroying holy books and Torah scrolls, prescribing that they be depos-
ited in a genizah (pl. genizot), a storage space that would be emptied peri-
odically and its contents buried.8 Of these, the Cairo Genizah is the most
famous. It was probably established in the eleventh century, and Cairo’s Jews
expanded the prohibition and preserved anything with Hebrew characters.
By the nineteenth century, this cache reflected a dynamic social history, and
its study has radically reformulated our understanding of the Middle Ages
across the Mediterranean world of North Africa, the Middle East, and the
Indian Ocean. The business of moneylending also relied on debt receipts,
which achieved especially mature form in medieval England when Richard
I (r. 1189–1199) insisted records be kept in triplicate.9 The 1290 expul-
sion of the Jews from England hinged partly on who held these records, as
nobles acquiesced to new taxes on the condition of the royal treasury’s sei-
zure and restructuring of outstanding debts to the Jews. But ironically, be-
cause the king possessed the debt receipts, and not the nobles, the barons and
knights paid far more in taxes than their previous liabilities.10 One can also
look to charters of Jewish settlement throughout medieval and early modern
Europe. The longstanding tradition of reissuing charters indicates how these
records continually secured Jewish communal life, undergirding a royal al-
liance between Jews and local rulers.11 In early modern Europe, too, Jews
kept books known as pinkasim (sing. pinkas), which compiled the records of
autonomous Jewish communal self-administration.12 And Jewish business
concerns also kept extensive records, especially with the rise of international
networks in the early modern period.13
All told, archives have been a continually important force throughout
all Jewish history, playing a role in religious practice, business, relations
to the state, and internal communal administration. Although the histo-
rian Markus Brann once claimed that a lachrymose history had left Jews
with “no leisure to create well-ordered archives,” in actuality the Jews’ dis-
persion corresponded with diverse collections reflecting the dynamism of
Jewish history.14 By the turn of the twentieth century, Jews the world over
pursued collecting activities ranging from historical societies in France
(1880), Germany (1885), the United States (1892), England (1893), and else-
where, to the folk collecting ethos of eastern European Jewry, which includes
6 A Time To Gather
this is not to mention the state’s claim to hegemony over the documentation
of daily life, with the authority to articulate and authenticate the recorded
reality of personal status, property ownership, and law and justice. In this
vein, a rising bureaucratic impulse—pushed by both the state and Jews’ own
self-interest in the management of their communal affairs—reflected Jews’
internalization of the state’s archival logic and its ability to make history,
whether in terms of historical agency itself or through the power to destroy
the past by absolving debt or pardoning crimes.26 This process swept from a
seemingly banal necessity to track and monitor the Jewish population to the
Israeli state’s documentary regime that adjudicates “proof ” of personal reli-
gious status, which marked a perverse pinnacle of this archival logic. There,
personal status has little to do with internal belief or external practice but is
instead tied to one’s parents’ marriage contract, a piece of paper produced
(and often misplaced) long before one’s own birth, in the absence of which
Jewishness is sometimes deemed dubitable. Consequently, the development
of archives in modern Jewish cultures ties together the relationship of Jews to
the state and its archival impulse—both to the states in which Jews have lived
in the diaspora and also to the pursuit of a state for the Jews.
The turn to archives in Jewish life lays bare the transformative, forward-
facing nature of archival activity and the struggle for control of Jewish cul-
ture. Archivists and scholars may have believed that by gathering historical
records, they were preserving the Jewish past for posterity as “neutral” actors.
Just as in the turn to history in Jewish culture—when scholars claimed to
pursue historical “objectivity” but actually lent ammunition to contempo-
rary debates about emancipation, nationalism, religious reform, and more—
so too was archiving never neutral. Neither was the act of calling something
an archive. If scholars and others hoped to preserve Jewish history as it really
was, the process of archiving actually transformed the past into new forms
that could be reordered to reflect their own sensibilities. In the end, if cre-
ating archives was about Jews taking control of their past, this rising archive
fever also led directly to the question of, and intense struggle over, how Jews
should direct their future.
as instruments for the control and expansion of social resources and pro-
cesses of the industrialized age. It is almost a truism that there have always
been bonds between knowledge and power, following Jacques Derrida and
Michel Foucault, who theorized the ties of archives, administration, and
governmentality, with representation (i.e., records) aiding in managing so-
ciety.27 But over the past few centuries, archives have held more forceful and
specific roles as bulwarks against what James R. Beniger termed a “crisis of
control” brought upon by the incredible masses of material and processes
in modern society.28 Archives are tools to bring society back under control
by assembling, organizing, and making available information—but, no-
tably, only to those properly authorized. Archives, then, reveal their nature as
institutions of control over society and government, over access, and thereby
over the narratives of history and culture that are produced on their basis.
For non-state or non-administrative actors too, archives represented
a means to control one’s own culture and history. And Jews, like other mi-
nority groups, wanted to hold their own archives as a way to preserve history
on their own terms and delineate how it could be told. In this way, Jewish
archive making is comparable to the efforts of nineteenth-century Jewish
scholars of Wissenschaft des Judentums and Hokhmat Yisra’el, who sought
to wrest the study of the Jewish past from Christian scholars.29 But while his-
torical scholarship is largely discursive, archives are eminently physical. They
consequently place the matter of Jewish culture in concrete terms. The relics
of the past stood for the possibility of controlling the present and marked the
ability of Jews to take possession of their own history. They were symbols for
groups, institutions, and communities to express claims of hegemony over
certain spheres of Jewish life, and also potent tools of practical power, like
when the Nazis commandeered Jewish archives to actively control Jewish
communities and lives. After the Second World War these debates reached
a fever pitch with the restitution struggles over who should receive the Jews’
looted archives and what all this might represent for the future.
The history of Jewish archives in the twentieth century, one might say,
tells a story of collecting historical materials outside the purview of state
archives. Or alternately, especially in light of post-Holocaust restitution, it
tells us about an attempt to remove looted records from a perpetrator state to
one that purported to represent, at least from the perspective of the Israelis,
the Jewish people at large. In this respect, Jews’ archival activities were not
dissimilar from other minority or disenfranchised groups who sought to
construct community- based archives, libraries, and museums. In fact,
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Freshfield, J. W. esq. New Bank Buildings.
Fry, Joseph, esq. Liverpool.
Fullarton, A. esq. 37, Brunswick-pl. Glasgow.
Fyffe, J. esq. 4, Buchanan st. Glasgow.
G
Graham, Sir J. Bart. M.P. 1, Portland-pl.
Gallemore, Liddel, Messrs. and Co. Manchester.
Gardin, Alex. esq. George-sq. Glasgow.
Gardner, J. esq. 39, Miller-street, Glasgow.
Garnett, Abraham, esq. Liverpool.
Geary, Thomas, esq. Manchester.
Geller, John G. esq. Liverpool.
Gibbins, Bruton, esq. Birmingham.
Gilfillan, J. esq. Liverpool.
Gillespie, A. esq. America-square.
Godmond, C. esq. Blackheath.
Gordon, A. esq. H.M. Consul, Havre de Grace.
Gordon, James, esq. Manchester.
Goring, Joshua, esq. Liverpool.
Gowen, John, esq. Mark-lane.
Gray, B. esq. Crescent, Ancoats, Manchester.
Graham, W. jun. esq. Cochrane-st. Glasgow.
Graham, William, esq. Liverpool.
Grant, D. esq. Manchester.
Grant, George, esq. Liverpool.
Grant, William, esq. Manchester.
Grant, John, esq. Manchester.
Greaves, John, esq. Banker, Manchester.
Greenough, Peter and Sons, Manchester.
Greenway, Charles, esq. Manchester.
Guimaraens, G. J. F. esq. Liverpool.
Gumpel, Gustavus, esq. Manchester.
H
Horrocks, Samuel, esq. M.P. 9, Bread-st.
Haddan, John, esq. 52, Wellclose-square.
Haffinden, J. esq. 28, Queen’s Sq. Bloomsbury.
Hamman, John, esq. Bow-lane.
Hancock, John, esq. Liverpool.
Hankey, W. Alers, esq. Fenchurch-street.
Hankey, Thomas, esq. Fenchurch-street.
Hardacre, George, esq. 23, Birchin-lane.
Hardie, David, esq. Liverpool.
Hardie, James, esq. Manchester.
Hardman, Thomas, esq. Manchester.
Hardy, William, esq. Mincing-lane.
Harrison, Anthony, esq. Penrith.
Harrison, J. esq. Marsden-sq. Manchester.
Harrison, William, esq. 13, Little Tower-st.
Haselden and Willis, Messrs. Liverpool.
Hatch, Oliver, esq. Ely-place.
Heale, Richard, esq. Mincing-lane.
Helps, Thomas, esq. Wood-street.
Hemsley, Henry, esq. Amsterdam.
Henderson, R. esq. Glasgow.
Henderson, G. esq. 6, St. Enoch’s Square, Glasgow.
Henderson, J. esq. 11, Great St. Helen’s.
Henderson, J. esq. Shap, Westmorland.
Henderson, W. esq. Lowthian Gill, Cumberland.
Henderson, Robert, esq. Lowthian Gill.
Heyworth, O. esq. Liverpool.
Heyworth, John, esq. Greev’s Nook, near Rochdale.
Heyworth, James, esq. Liverpool.
Hill, Thomas, esq. Manchester.
Hill, W. esq. 17, Old Mill Gate, Manchester.
Hitchen, Jonathan, esq. Bolton.
Hodgson, Thomas, esq. Euston-square.
Hodgson, T. esq. Church-lane, Whitechapel.
Holliwell and Highfield, Messrs. Liverpool.
Holme, W. esq. Sackville-st. Piccadilly.
Hornby, J. T. and W. Messrs. Liverpool.
Horridge, T. G. esq. Fountain-st. Manchester.
Horrox and Son, Messrs. Manchester.
Horrox, Jackson, Messrs. and Co. Manchester.
Howard, L. esq. Long Room, Custom-House.
Hoyle, Thomas, jun. esq. Manchester.
Hulme, John, esq. Manchester.
Hunter, And. esq. 11, Candlerigs, Glasgow.
Hurry, William, esq. Liverpool.
Hurst, John, esq. Manchester.
Husey, N. esq. 91, Watling-street.
Hutcheson, C. esq. George-sq. Glasgow.
I&J
Izon, Thomas, esq. Birmingham.
James, W. esq. M.P. Coulson’s Hotel, Brook-street.
Jackson, R. esq. Manchester. (2 copies.)
Jackson, John, esq. 1, Cannon-street, Manchester.
James, Thomas, esq. 17, Cheapside.
Jelf, George, esq. Norwood.
Jones, Richard, esq. 10, Aldgate.
Jones, Richard, esq. Four Yards, Manchester.
Josling, Thomas, esq. 34, Broad-street.
K
Kay, W. esq. Tring-Park, Hertfordshire, and Hampstead.
Kay, Joseph, Watling-street, Manchester.
Kearsley, John, esq. Liverpool.
Kemble, Henry, esq. Watling-street.
Kennedy, James, esq. Ancoats-lane, Manchester.
Kent, Samuel, esq. Mark-lane.
Kenworthy, W. esq. Pernambuco.
Kewley, P. esq. Liverpool.
Keymer, Titus, esq. Lawrence-lane.
Keyser, S. esq. 23, Finch-lane.
Kirtley, George, esq. Manchester.
Knight, James, esq. Rhual, near Mould, Flintshire.
Knight, Samuel, esq. Manchester.
Knight, Nathan, esq. Manchester.
Kolft, G. esq. Liverpool.
L
Lonsdale, The Right Hon. the Earl of, Charles-street, Berkeley-square.
Lonsdale, The Right Hon. the Countess of, Charles-street, Berkeley-square.
Lowther, The Hon. Col. M.P. Bruton-st.
Laing, Charles, esq. 26, Lawrence-Poulteney-lane.
Latham, Wm., esq. Liverpool. (2 copies.)
Lawrence, Isaac, esq. Balham-hill.
Lawrence, W. and E. and Co. Messrs. Liverpool, and 9, Trinity-sq. London.
Leake, L. and G. Messrs. Threadneedle-st.
Ledward, E. and C. Messrs. Liverpool.
Leech, Rev. J. L. A.M. Vicar of Askham.
Leigh, J. P. esq. Clapton.
Lewis, Edward, esq. and Co. Manchester.
Lindeman, Frederick, esq. H.M. Consul-General, Sicily.
Little, William, esq. Stock-Exchange.
Liverpool Union Book Society.
Lodge, H. R. esq. 11, Bow-church-yard.
Lomax, John, esq. Manchester.
Lomax, Richard, esq. 10, West-square.
Low, Andrew, esq. Liverpool.
Low, George, esq. Birmingham.
Lowe, John, esq. 5, Jeffrey’s Square.
Lowe, Arthur, esq. Liverpool.
Loyd, Edward, esq. Banker, Manchester.
Loyd, Lewis, esq. Lothbury.
Loyd, William, esq. Bread-street.
Lukin, C. jun. esq. 16, George-street, Mansion-house.
Lyne, W. and Sudell, T. Messrs. Liverpool.
M
Musgrave, Sir P. Bart. M.P. 39, Portland-p.
Macadam, P. esq. 26, Bell-street, Glasgow.
M’Cabe, Thomas, esq. Stoke-Newington.
M’Cartney, A. esq. Commercial Bank, Edinburgh.
M’Conochie, W. esq. Glasgow.
M’Farquhar, J. esq. York-st. Liverpool.
Macfie, D. esq. 36, Candleriggs, Glasgow.
Machell, John, esq. Low Plains, Penrith.
M’Keand, James, esq. Liverpool.
M’Keand, J. and J. Messrs. Manchester.
M’Kerrel, Henry, esq. Liverpool.
Maclachlan, D. esq. Parahiba.
M’Nair, John, esq. jun. Glasgow.
M’Neile, John, and Co. Messrs. Lawrence-Poulteney-lane.
M’William, R. esq. Liverpool.
March, William, esq. Broad-street.
March, T. and W. and Co. Messrs. 15, New Broad-street.
Marchant, Mr. W. Ingram-ct. Fenchurch-st.
Mardall, R. esq. 14, Little Tower-street.
Marris, Francis, esq. Manchester.
Marsh, John, esq. 66, Coleman-street.
Marshall, J. esq. York-street, Manchester.
Martin, William, esq. Hornsey.
Martindale, Richard, esq. 62, Cornhill.
Martindale, D. esq. Liverpool.
Masterman, John, esq. White Hart-court, Lombard-street.
Mathews, Samuel, esq. Salford.
Matley, Richard, esq. Manchester.
Matthie, H. esq. Liverpool.
Maubert, J. F. esq. Warnford-court.
Meirilles, A. esq. Liverpool.
Mellor, Thomas, esq. Liverpool.
Meyrick, E. esq. Spitalfields.
Middleton, R. D. esq. Wellington-place, Commercial-road.
Mieville, Andrew A. esq. Angel-court, Throgmorton-street.
Miles, Rev. John, St. Michael’s Rectory, Cornhill.
Miller, John, esq. Liverpool.
Miller, M. esq. Islington, Liverpool.
Milner, James, esq. Old Change.
Mitcalfe, William, esq. Gower-street, or Coal-Exchange.
Mitchell, William, esq. Mincing-lane.
Molyneux, Anthony, esq. Liverpool.
Monteath, J. esq. Buchanan-st. Glasgow.
Monteith, R. esq. Richmond-st. Glasgow.
Monteith, William, esq. 4, Blythwood-place, Glasgow.
Moon, Edward, esq. Liverpool.
Moore, Dr. Bolton.
Morgan, John, esq. ’Change-alley.
Morgan, W. esq. Pope’s Head-alley.
Morley, John, esq. West Smithfield.
Morrison, J. esq. 33, Glassford-st. Glasgow.
Morrison, W. esq. 14, Miller-st. Glasgow.
Moxon, J. D. esq. Liverpool.
Muir, J. esq. Ingram-Buildings, Glasgow.
Murphy, George, esq. Manchester.
Murray, G. esq. Ancoat’s Hall, Manchester.
N
Naylor, Jeremiah, jun. esq. Liverpool.
Needham, Samuel, esq. Liverpool.
Nesbitt, John, esq. Tokenhouse-yard.
Nevitt, William, esq. Liverpool.
Newall, A. esq. 4, Virginia-street, Glasgow.
Newman, Thomas, esq. Hertingfordbury, near Hertford.
Nicholson, William, esq. Lowther.
Noble, William, esq. 36, Foley-place.
Noble, J. esq. 8, Tokenhouse-yard.
Norris, Edward, esq. Manchester.
O
Oughton, James, esq. Manchester.
P
Packer, Richard, esq. Mile-end.
Packer, R. W. esq. Stepney-green.
Page, Charles, esq. 10, Austin-friars.
Park, John, esq. Liverpool.
Parker, W. esq. Manchester.
Parker, Robert, esq. Heaton Mersey, Manchester.
Parker, C. esq. Pettrill-green, Cumberland.
Parkins, J. W. esq. late Sheriff, Bridge-street.
Paterson, Alexander, esq. Manchester.
Paton, John, esq. Bow Church-yard.
Peck, Samuel, esq. Liverpool.
Peel, Edmund, esq. 30, Bucklersbury.
Penny, J. S. esq. Leaf-sq. Manchester.
Percival, R. jun. esq. 76, Lombard-street.
Pickering, Edward Rowland, esq. Clapham.
Platt, Dr. Bolton.
Pollard, J. esq. Manchester.
Potter, John, esq. Manchester.
Potter, Richard, esq. Manchester.
Powell, James, esq. Carey-street.
Price, Joseph, esq. 7, King-street.
Price, Buckley, esq. Manchester.
Pringle, George, esq. Stoke-Newington.
Pringle, Keneth, esq. Liverpool.
Pritt, G. A. esq. Liverpool.
Provand, Charles M. esq. 31, Miller-street, Glasgow.
Pullen, J. esq. late Under Sheriff, Fore-street.
R
Rainier, Daniel, esq. 11, ’Change-alley.
Rainforth, Dr. John, Bolton.
Ramsay, Dr. Pernambuco.
Ramsome, J. A. esq. Mosley-street, Manchester.
Ray, Joseph, esq. American Consul, Pernambuco. (20 copies.)
Reardon, Daniel, esq. Corbet-court, Grace-church-street.
Richardson, Christ. esq. Brunswick-sq.
Richardson, John, esq. Liverpool.
Richardson, Samuel, esq. Liverpool.
Ridgway, J. esq. Ridgmont, Lancashire.
Rigg, James, esq. King-st. Manchester.
Rignell, James, esq. Chelsea.
Rivaz, A. esq. Stoke-Newington.
Robinson, James, esq. Walbrook.
Rogers, S. esq. Watlands, near Newcastle, Staffordshire.
Roskell, R. and J. Messrs. Liverpool.
Rothschild, N. M. esq. Stamford-hill.
Row, J. esq. 2, Aldermary-church-yard.
Rowlandson, Rev. J. Shap, Westmorland.
Royle, Vernon, esq. Manchester.
Rushforth, Richard, esq. Manchester.
Rushton, W. esq. Liverpool.
Russell, Edward, esq. Maidstone.
S
Spencer, the Rt. Hon. the Earl of, St. James’s Place.
Strangford, the Rt. Hon. Lord, Minister, Constantinople.
Sadler, Joseph, esq. 2, Bow-lane.
Samuel, S. M. esq. 1, Hammet-street, America-square.
Samuel and Phillips, Messrs. 8, South-street, Finsbury-square.
Saner, James, esq. Sun-street.
Schwieger, G. E. F. esq. Highbury-terrace.
Scott, John, esq. Du Four’s Place.
Sealy, George T. esq. Liverpool.
Sheldon, S. esq. Milk-street.
Shepherd, H. esq. Union-street, Borough.
Sherman, J. R. esq. Lime-street.
Shore, Joseph, esq. Birmingham.
Slade, Rev. J. Bolton.
Smith, J. S. esq. Holloway-place.
Smith, R. esq. Finch-lane.
Smith, Charles, esq. High-street, Manchester.
Smith, John, esq. Piccadilly, Manchester.
Smith, Samuel, esq. 40, Commercial Sale Rooms, Mincing-lane.
Soulby, A. esq. St. Mary-hill.
Spenceley, J. H. esq. 20, Lawrence Poulteney-lane.
Spooner, T. esq. George-yard, Lombard-street.
Stable, Henry, esq. 115, Duke-street, Leicester-fields.
Stephenson, F. esq. Pope’s Head-alley.
Stevenson, George, esq. 42, Bow-lane.
Stirling, Charles, esq. Glasgow.
Stocks, Samuel, esq. Manchester.
Stuart, J. esq. St. Vincent-lane, Glasgow.
Stubbs, Thomas, esq. 16, Lad-lane.
Stwewardson, Thomas, esq. Adelphi.
Sydebotham, Charles, esq. Liverpool.
Symonds, John, esq. Old Jewry.
T
Thompson, W. esq. M.P. 12, Gloucester-place, Portman-square.
Tate, W. esq. Old Jewry.
Taylor, Thomas, esq. 7, Back-square, Manchester.
Taylor, J. esq. Bradford-house, Bolton.
Taylor, James, esq. Liverpool.
Tennant, John, esq. Henry-street, Liverpool.
Thomas, J. W. esq. Liverpool.
Thomas, W. esq. 1, Cateaton-street.
Thompson, J. esq. 44, Old Change.
Thorp, J. T. esq. Lord Mayor, London.
Thorp, Dr. King-street, Manchester.
Tinkler, W. esq. Putney, Surrey.
Tootal, Henry, esq. Manchester.
Townend, W. esq. Manchester.
Tristram, H. esq. 138, Leadenhall-street.
Turner, George, esq. Liverpool.
Turner, Brade, and Co. Messrs. Liverpool.
V
Varty, William, esq. Bishopsgate-street.
W
Waterhouse, Nicholas, esq. Liverpool.
Wemyss, General, 19, Cumberland-street.
Whalley, John, esq. 11, Bow Church-yard.
Wheeler, Samuel, esq. Surrey-square.
Wiegbers, J. esq. 23, Finch-lane.
Wilkinson, E. esq. Long Room, Custom-House.
Wilkinson, Thomas, esq. 8, Fitzroy-square.
Wilkinson, Robert, esq. Islington.
Wilde, James, esq. Manchester.
Williams, B. and T. Messrs. Manchester.
Williams, Thomas, esq. Liverpool.
Williamson and Watson, Messrs. Dublin.
Willis, Daniel, esq. Liverpool.
Wilson, Crighton, and Co. Messrs. Manchester.
Wilson, R. esq. Clement’s Lane.
Wilson, Thomas, esq. Staple Inn.
Wilson, Samuel, esq. Aldermanbury.
Windus, Thomas, esq. Stoke-Newington.
Winstanley, W. esq. 10, Paternoster-row.
Wingate, J. esq. 190, Trongate, Glasgow.
Wood, Philip, esq. Russell-square.
Woodhouse, W. esq. Liverpool.
Worthington, Thomas, esq. Mosley-street, Manchester.
Wright, George, esq. Birmingham.
Wright, Edmund, esq. Manchester.
Wright, H. esq. Ingram’s Buildings, Glasgow.
Wrighton, A. esq. Moor’s Place, Hope-street, Glasgow.
Wybergh, John, esq. Liverpool.
Wylie, John, esq. Liverpool.
Y
Yates, John, esq. Manchester.
A MAP of the BRAZIL
Designed by Jas. Henderson
From the Materials of his
HISTORY of the BRAZIL.
AN
BRAZIL.
CHAPTER I.
Voyage from England to Rio de Janeiro.
About this time we lost the north-east trade wind, which was
succeeded by calms and squalls, that detained us seven or eight
days near the Line. Nothing can be experienced in a voyage much
more unpleasant than this vicissitude of weather. The irksomeness
of a calm near the equator is rendered almost insupportable by the
ardent rays of the sun; every one seems to languish: several, and
often many hours drag heavily on, while the vessel makes no
progress, and only experiences a disagreeable motion by the
heaving of the glassy ocean, its surface not being in the least ruffled
by a breath of air. In the mean time, an elemental war is brooding. A
black and pitchy cloud is seen awfully and slowly moving on, with
fury in its train; all is alarm; with haste the sails are lowered. The
sullen langour of the atmosphere is succeeded by the “maddening
tempest,” so suddenly and with so little warning, that sometimes,
before every precaution can be taken, the sweeping impetuosity lays
the vessel instantaneously upon her side, and, in that situation, she
is hurried forward with immense velocity. These conflicting winds are
as quickly followed by solid torrents of rain. In a short period, all is
tranquillity again, and the returning sun, in burning radiance,
annihilates the last breeze that feebly curled the face of the ocean.
The same scenes alternately present themselves. During the night
these sudden squalls are the most dangerous, as their approach
cannot be so well ascertained.
On the first day that we were becalmed, notwithstanding the
advances we occasionally made by the transient operation of those
gusts, we found our latitude 1° 43′ north, and the preceding day it
was only 1° 23′. This can only be accounted for by the strong
northerly currents now prevailing here; and hence it would appear,
that the same invariable law of attraction governs them as well as
the winds. The squalls I have mentioned also came from the south
and south-east, and the winds beginning at this time to blow here,
issue from the same quarter, in consequence, no doubt, of the sun
being in the northern tropic. If he creates a vacuum in his vicinity by
the rarefaction of the air, which induces a great influx from the
southern and northern hemispheres of the atmosphere, in like
manner the exuberant evaporations from the sea may produce a
rushing of the waters to supply what is lost (pro tempore) by
vapours. Various causes, however, operate to prevent an uniform
appearance in this respect, such as the occasional counter-attraction
of the moon and other celestial bodies, of continents and other
lands, as well as a prevailing repulsive power in nature. Still if those
effects could be minutely followed through their various ramifications,
it might be found that the winds and currents originate in the
combinations I have ventured to suggest. Is it not possible, that the
calms near the equator at this period may arise from the equally
poised contention of the south-east and north-east winds meeting,
and that the former, in the sun’s march through the northern tropic,
will gradually gain upon the latter in extent of dominion proportioned
to the sun’s declination, and vice versa as he recedes through the
southern tropic, or, more properly speaking, in the earth’s oblique
revolution round the sun? The rust, which at this time constantly
showed itself upon my razors, was probably owing to some peculiar
corrosive properties in the atmosphere, or it might have arisen from
some saline moisture insinuating itself every where imperceptibly.
But to attempt to comprehend or explain the extraordinary
operations in the grand work of nature, in this and other latitudes,
has in many instances baffled the keenest sagacity and most
laborious research. Secondary causes of the phenomena in nature
are often beyond the clearest ken of human intellect, how then are
the faculties of the mind bewildered in the contemplation of the great
First Cause! How lost and absorbed in adoration of the Divine
source, the essence of all those wonderfully diversified appearances!
The hand moves the pen with which I now write; I can trace the
power that impels it—the cause of this effect, to the immediate
impulse only, that is, to the muscles in the arm, that, arising thence,
connect themselves with the hand. But can I go back any further?
Can I ascertain what it is that produces this admirable power in the
muscles, this secondary cause? Reason here discovers its confined
limit as to remoter and efficient causes, but, bounding at once over
these concealed regions of knowledge, sees and acknowledges the
great original source of all finite existence, and in the power of
thinking, and in the movement of his bodily frame, man feels that
“It is the Divinity that stirs within him.”