Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Term 2 Assignment
Term 2 Assignment
argument for your stance on using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. (600-800)
One of the primary arguments for the integration of AI in education is its ability to enhance
personalized learning experiences. AI can analyze vast amounts of data to tailor educational
content to individual students' needs, learning styles, and progress. This capability is
highlighted in the ELM Week 11 document, which discusses the concept of rhizomatic
learning—a metaphor derived from botany, emphasizing dynamic, open-ended, and self-
adjusting learning pathways . AI can facilitate such personalized and adaptive learning
environments by continuously assessing students' performance and providing customized
resources and feedback.
Moreover, AI-powered tools like ChatGPT can support students in various learning activities.
The Feldman ChatGPT document underscores how AI chatbots can simulate real
conversations, helping students develop their writing and critical thinking skills through
interaction with AI . These tools can offer immediate feedback, assist with research, and
provide explanations, thus supporting independent learning.
Despite the potential benefits, the use of AI in education also raises significant challenges and
ethical concerns. One major issue is the threat to academic integrity. AI tools can be misused
for cheating and plagiarism, as they can generate essays, solve problems, and produce
assignments that students might submit as their own work. The Feldman document discusses
this concern, noting that some educational institutions have banned AI-generated texts to
prevent academic dishonesty .
Additionally, there are concerns about the digital divide and accessibility. Not all students
have equal access to advanced technologies and the internet, which can exacerbate
educational inequalities. The conceptual framework in the Feldman document addresses the
digital divide, highlighting the disparities in access, use, and benefits of digital tools among
different student populations . AI's effectiveness in education depends on students' ability to
access and utilize these technologies, which can be hindered by socioeconomic factors.
Ethical implications regarding data privacy and security also need to be considered. AI
systems often require access to sensitive student data to function effectively. Ensuring the
protection of this data and preventing unauthorized access or misuse is crucial. The UNESCO
concerns mentioned in the Feldman document emphasize the need for robust regulations and
ethical guidelines to safeguard students' privacy and maintain academic integrity .
To harness the benefits of AI while mitigating its risks, a balanced and thoughtful approach is
essential. Educators and policymakers need to develop frameworks that incorporate AI
ethically and responsibly into educational practices. One such approach is the concept of
"accountable writing" proposed by Beetham (2023) in the Feldman document. This concept
suggests designing assessment tasks that require students to engage critically with AI-
generated content, thereby promoting ethical use of AI and enhancing critical thinking skills .
Furthermore, fostering digital literacy among students and educators is vital. Understanding
how AI works, its capabilities, and its limitations can help users make informed decisions and
use AI tools effectively. The ELM Week 11 document advocates for a reduction in hierarchy
and the promotion of diverse, interconnected learning experiences, which can be supported
by AI while encouraging critical and independent thinking .
Conclusion
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant inroads into various sectors, including
education. The integration of AI tools, such as ChatGPT, into the educational process has
sparked a vigorous debate about its benefits and drawbacks. This essay critically analyzes the
role of AI in education, drawing on the insights from the provided documents, particularly the
research on AI's impact on assessment and learning conducted by Feldman in "ChatGPT and
Assessment in Higher Education."
The allure of AI in education lies in its potential to revolutionize teaching and learning. AI
systems, trained on extensive datasets, can analyze large volumes of data to identify patterns
and make informed decisions, mimicking human intellectual processes like reasoning and
generalization. ChatGPT, a generative AI model, can produce human-like text, answer
questions, assist with translations, and generate content such as essays and research
summaries. These capabilities present unique opportunities for enhancing educational
practices by automating administrative tasks, creating learning materials, and providing
personalized learning experiences.
One of the primary arguments in favor of AI in education is its ability to offer personalized
learning experiences. AI tools can adapt to individual students' needs, providing tailored
feedback and support. This personalized approach can help address diverse learning styles
and paces, making education more inclusive and effective. For instance, ChatGPT can assist
students in understanding complex concepts by generating explanations that cater to their
specific queries, thereby enhancing their learning experience.
However, the integration of AI in education is not without its challenges. One significant
concern is the potential for AI tools to undermine academic integrity. The ease with which
students can generate AI-assisted content raises the specter of plagiarism and cheating.
Feldman’s research highlights that while AI tools like ChatGPT can produce well-written
essays and research summaries, they can also generate incorrect or misleading information.
This inconsistency poses a risk to the quality of education and the reliability of assessments.
Furthermore, the reliance on AI in education exacerbates the digital divide. Not all students
have equal access to digital resources and the internet, which can lead to disparities in
learning opportunities. Feldman emphasizes the need to consider the different levels of digital
capital that students possess. Access to AI tools does not guarantee that all students can
equally benefit from them, as varying levels of digital literacy and access can influence the
effectiveness of AI-assisted learning.