Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 9
Wi 4 Plant Pathology Journal ISSN 1872-5887 science alert Plant Pathology Journal 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 ISSN 1812-5387 © 2009 Asian Network for Scientific Information Effect of Combined Use of Bacillus subtilis CA32 and Trichoderma harzianum RUO1 on Biological Control of Rhizoctonia solani on Solanum melongena and Capsicum annuum S. Abeysinghe Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka Abstract: A combination of two compatible biological control agents, Bacillus subtilis CA32 and Trichoderma harzianum RUOI, both antagonistic to the pathogen Rhizoctonia salani, was used to control damping-off in Solanum melongena and Capsicum annuum. Radial growth of the mycelium of R. solani was inhibited by T. harzianum RUOL in dual Petri plate assay. T. harzianum RUOL was capable to invading the whole surface of the pathogen colony, sporulating on it and suppress the production of sclerotia of R. solani. Microscopic studies showed the hyphae of R. solani surrounded by the T. harzianum RUOL and subsequent disintegration. B. subtilis CA32 produced a zone of inhibition only with the pathogen and no sings of antagonism between the bacteria and 7. harzianwn RUOI on dual Petri plate assay. Significant plant protection was achieved when either B. subtilis added to the seeds or T. harzianum added to soil. However, when combine application of biocontrol agents, seed bacterization and T. harzianum application to soil, significantly enhanced the plant protection from R. solani. Soil application of B. subtilis and seed application of T. harzianum either singly or in combination did not protect from R. solani infection indicating that the importance of mode of application of biocontrol agents. Key words: Antagonism, aubergine, chili, mycoparasitism, synergism INTRODUCTION Solanum melongena L. (brinjal, aubergine or egg plant) and Capsicum annuum L. (chili or hot pepper) are important vegetable and spice crops especially in South East Asia. In general, these kinds of small seed crops are grown first in seed beds as nurseries and 3-4 weeks old seedlings are used to transplant in fields. Several fungal, bacterial and viral plant pathogens cause different diseases on both crops during the seedling stage therefore some times farmers confront with problems of getting healthy planting materials to establish on fields at suitable time. Among the fungal diseases, damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani is very common in nurseries and one of the most important soil-borne pathogens in Sri Lanka (Kudagamage er al., 2003). Currently, Rhizoctonia damping-off is managed by cultural practices and application of fungicides. However, these methods are not completely effective and Rhizoctonia disease remains a_ persistent problem in Sri Lanka (Kudagamage er al., 2003). Although, some fungicides offer significant protection against R. solani, their negative impacts on beneficial soil microorganisms and on environment can not be ignored. It is therefore necessary to develop alternative methods to control such soil-borne pathogens, One such alternative is biological control, in which microorganisms are selected for their ability to antagonize pathogens (Handelsman and Stabb, 1996). Biological control can be an effective means of control in many instance where chemical is not available or practical. Biological control of Rhizoctonia diseases has been demonstrated and represents as an additional strategy that may provide effective and sustainable management (Brewer and Larkin, 2005). Although biological control of different soil-borne pathogens on chili cultivars have been reported by Mao er al. (1998), Sid Ahamed er al. (1999), Ramamoorthy ef ai. (2002) and Nakkeeran et al. (2006) biological control of damping-off caused by R. solani on S. melongena has not been reported. It has been reported that application of a single strain of a biological control agent is less effective than chemical protection and its effect may not consistence (Weller, 1988). This low and unstable efficacy or variability of plant protection of biological control agents may be due to the complexity of the ecosystem (Guetsky et af., 2002). Possible approaches of enhancement of the efficacy of biological control agent against soil-borne pathogens has been reviewed and it has been identified that one way to improve biological control ability may be the use of mixtures or combinations of biocontrol agents (Spadaro and Gullino, 2005). Pierson and Weller (1994) reported that Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 combining different Pseudomonas fluorescens strains increased the control of wheat take-all compared to the strains used individually. Raupach and Kloepper (1998) showed that use of combined application of biocontrol bacteria significantly enhanced the plant protection against different cucumber pathogens. Apart from the some reports that combine of bacterial with biological control fungi especially Trichoderma sp. showed increased plant protection than they showed when used individually, For example, Brewer and Larkin (2005) reported that combination of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma virens ance against R. solani on potato than these biocontrol agents used individually. A positive, probably synergistic, interaction between Trichoderma sp. strains and bacterial species has been reported for combined applications in the control of plant pathogens (Fogliano et al., 2002). Ezziyyani et al. (2007) reported that the combined application of 7. harzianum and Streptomyces rechei was more effective in controlling Phytophthora root rot in bell pepper. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of B. subtilis CA32 andT. harzianum RUOL individually and in combinations with respect to the mode of application of biocontrol agents on protection of brinjal and chili seedlings against damping- off caused by &. solani during the seedbed stage under greenhouse conditions. bacterial combinations, indicated enhanced the re: MATERIALS AND METHODS Experiment sites and place: The experiments reported in this study were conducted at the Department of Botany, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka during the period of 2001-2005. Pot experiments were conducted in the greenhouse located at the department. Pathogen isolation and identification: Chili plants showing necrotic lesions at the crown or collar region were collected from commercial chili fields in Southern Province in Sri Lanka. The samples were washed under tap water, placed in 0.5% NaOCl for 2 min, rinsed twice in Sterile Distilled Water (SDW) and blotted on sterile paper towels. About 1 cm pieces having lesions were then placed on PDA plates amended with chlorampheni (100 pg mL~') to prevent growing of bacteria. After incubation over night at room temperature 254+2°C in the dark, agar plug containing actively growing mycelium was transferred to a fresh PDA plate and repeated this procedure till get a pure colony. R. solani was identified by using the colony characters and structure of sclerotia described by Sneh ef a/. (1991). The pathogenicity of the fungal isolates on brinjal and chili was confirmed by following Koch's postulates. Isolation of rhizospheric bacteria and Trichoderma: Rhizospheric bacteria were isolated healthy plants obtained from commercial chili fields in the southern Province of Sri Lanka. Roots from young (about 3-4 weeks old) healthy plants were selected and brought to the laboratory. Plants were gently shaken in order to remove large soil clumps and roots cut into about 2 cm pieces. Then the root pieces were macerated in 10 mL sterile saline (NaCI 0.85%, w/v). Serially diluted aliquots from the suspension were separately plated on Casamino acids medium (Casamina Acid Agar (CAA), 5.0 g Casamino acid, 1.20 g K,HPO, and 0.25 g MgSO,.7H,0 in | L H,0), King’s B medium (KB, 20.0 g protease peptone, 2.0 ¢ K,HPO,.3H,0, 1.5 ¢ MgSO,.7H,0 and 15 mL glycerol). Plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 days. One colony per colony type was purified on CAA plates. Strains were stored at -80°C in glycerol (20%, v/v). Trichoderma sp. were isolated from soil samples obtained from the same field by using dilution Petri plate technique on Trichoderma Selective Medium (TSM) (Askew and Laing, 1993) and maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Identification was performed by using colony characteristics described by Bissett (1991). Screening of antagonistic bacteria against R. solani in Petri plate assay: About 83 bacterial isolates were initially screened for the ability to inhibit R. sofani on CAA and KB plates. In the preliminary screening single colonies were selected and patched along the perimeters of plates and incubated overnight at 28°C. The following day each plate was inoculated with a R. solani plug (5 mm diameter) at the centre. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 2-3 days and observed for inhibition of fungal growth. The bacterial isolates positive for antagonism were selected based on the inhibition zone and the strains were ranked. The Gram test was performed to separate bacterial isolates according to their morphology and staining response. Antagonistic bacterial isolates were identified based on their physiological profiling according to Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Palleroni, 1984), Interaction between Trichoderma sp. and R. solani in Petri plate assay: Five millimeter diameter discs of Trichoderma sp. grown on PDA were removed and placed on one side of a Petri dishes containing PDA medium. Similar discs of R. solani isolate grown in the same Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 manner were placed on the opposite side of Petri plates. Cultures were observed daily while incubating at 28°C and recorded for antagonism or parasitism of Trichoderma isolates against R. solani. Three replicates were included. Seed bacterization and soil application; Among the bacterial isolates the most antagonistic bacterial isolate, according to the in vitro Petri plate assay, spontaneous rifampicin mutant of B. subtilis CA32 was selected for greenhouse pot experiments. Fresh cells of the bacteria were obtained from stock cultures stored at -80°C and grown in CAA broth for overnight at room temperature (2542°C) on a shaker at 80 rpm. From this 100 mL CAA broth in a 250 mL flask was inoculated and incubated for 48 h at room temperature (2542°C) on an orbital shaker (80 rpm). The bacterial culture was centrifuged (6000 g for 10 min at 4°C) and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was resuspended in sterile 0.85% NaCl and centrifuged again at the same conditions. The supernatant was discarded and washed bacterial cells were resuspended in Sterile Distilled Water (SDW). The concentration of cells in the suspension was adjusted to 10° cells mL“ by using a spectrophotometer at OD,,. by using a standardized graph used for bacterization or soil application. For seed bacterization, a batch of 50 seeds at a time was immersed in 100 mL of the bacterial suspension for 30 min, placed on a blotting paper and dried for 2 h in a laminar flow. Soil inoculation was performed by adding 100 mL. of the bacterial suspension (10 cell mL) as a soil drench to cover the whole soil surface of each pot. and seed Inoculum production of Trichoderma harzianum RUO1: Among the Trichoderma isolates, T. harzianum RUOL profusely growth on PDA plates, produced substantial amount of conidia and showed strong in vitro antagonism against R. solani. Therefore, T. harzianum RUO] was selected for further studies. Four discs (5 mm diameter) of actively growing T. harzianwn RUOL were cut out from the PDA plate and transferred to a glass Petri dish (90 mm diameter) containing a mixture of coir dust and rice bran (3:1, v/v) that had been moistened with 25 mL distilled water and autoclaved for 20 min at 121°C for two consecutive days. The dishes were incubated at room temperature (25+2°C) in darkness for 15 days. Viability of the inoculum was confirmed by plating on PDA. This inoculum was used for soil inoculation (approximately 10° cfu g soil). For seed inoculation, T. harzianum RUOL was grown on PDA in Petri plates for 7 days at room temperature (2522°C) under dark to allow profuse sporulation. Sterile distilled water was added to each plate and a conidial suspension was obtained by scraping the colony surface with a sterile spatula and filter through cheese cloth. Conidial was adjusted to 10° spores mL and mixed (0.01%) Tween-20 as a wetting agent, Inoculation of seeds was performed as mentioned for bacterization. suspension Preparation of R. se/ani inoculum used to infest the potting mix: To prepare the pathogen inoculum, Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) was used. One hundred milliliter of PDB in 250 mL flasks were inoculated with four mycelial dises (5 mm diameter) of R. solani on PDA. The flasks were incubated in the dark at room temperature (2542°C) for 7 days. The mycelium mat was separated and homogenated in SDW. The inoculum of the pathogen was introduced to the upper 5cm of soil (approximately 25 propagules of R. solani g™ soil), The infested soil was covered with paddy straw and incubated for 3 days at room temperature (25+2°C) to give appropriate conditions to the pathogen. Pot experiments under greenhouse conditions: The experiment was conducted in plastic pots (15 cm diameter) where the pots were filled with approximately 1200 g of soil (clay:sand:coir dust at 1:1:1, v/v), Fifty seeds per pot were sown in the pots 3 cm below the soil surface. Eight treatments were tested: T, = Healthy control (uninoculated) Diseased control (inoculated with R. solani) Bacterized seeds T. harzianum added seeds B. subtilis added to soil T. harzianum added to soil T, = B. subtilis to seed and T. harzianwm to soil T, =T. harzianum to seeds and B, subrilis to soil The pots were arranged on greenhouse benches in a completely randomized block design, The experiment was repeated three times and three replicates were included per treatment. Plants were grown in a greenhouse at the Department of Botany, University of Ruhuna for 30 days (The pots were watered every day (50 mL/pot), 28-30°C day and 24°C night temperature, 8045% relative humidity and 12 h light/dark photoperiod). The collar region (stem base) and the root system of each plant was evaluated to determine disease severity according to a 1-5 scale: 1 = No visible symptoms 2 = Light discoloration with one or two small lesions Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 3 = <25% stem base and root tissues covered with lesions; 25-50% stem base and root tissues covered with lesions 4 = 50-75% stem base and root tissues covered with lesions = >75% stem base and root tissues covered with lesions combined with a severe reduction in the root system or dead plants During this period, damping-off seedlings were randomly removed and plated on acidified PDA to determine the cause of damping-off. Number of RX, solani in soil and rhizosphere: Number of R. solani propagules in soil and on rhizosphere was assessed at the end of each experiment using Rhizoctonia selective medium according to Szezech and Shoda (2004). Five grams of soil were collected in flask from each pot representing different treatments closed to the root system and mixed thoroughly considered as the bulk soil. R. solani populations in the rhizosphere of both crops were assessed by macerating | g of fresh root in SDW and ten times serially diluted aliquots were plated on the above medium. Each sample was replicated three times. Statistical analysis: In all the experiments, treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Data were analyzed using SPSS 10.0 for Windows. Mean separation was accomplished using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The statistical significance was determined at (p = 0.05). RESULTS Pathogen identification and characteristics: Rhizoctonia isolate grown on PDA or CAA turned brown after about 7 days of incubation and the sclerotia were light brown and turned dark brown after few days. However, AG- group determination was not done. The pathogenicity of the Rhizoctonia isolate was performed with different local chili and brinjal cultivars. The Rhizoctonia isolate was pathogenic in all tested local cultivars of both plant species. Therefore, the isolate was identified as a virulent strain of R. solani. Identification and characterization of Trichoderma sp.: The highly antagonistic isolate of Trichoderma sp. grew rapidly at room temperature on PDA. The culture at first was white and cottony then turned to bright green, finally turned dark green. Chlamydospores were intercalary and/or terminal, globose and smooth walled. Single phialides arose laterally on the conidiophores in clusters Bissett (1991). Therefore, the Trichoderma sp. was identified as T. harzianwn and designated as RUOL and selected for further experiments. In vitro antagonism tests R. solani against T. harzianum RU@1: Antagonistic properties of T. harzianum RUOI was tested through dual Petri plate method. 7. harzianum RUOI inhibited the mycelial growth of R. solani but could not overgrow pathogen’s colony. However, several days later R. solani completely over grew by the Trichoderma mycelia. Furthermore, sclerotia formation did not observe compared to the control plates. B. subtilis CA32 against T. harzianum RUO1: Antagonistic properties of B. subrilis CA32 were tested by using dual Petri plate assay. B. subrilis CA32 did not show any antagonism against T. harzianum RUOL isolate. Indeed after 7 days, the Trichoderma isolate was over grown the bacterial colony (data not shown). R. solani against B. subtilis CA32: Number of bacterial isolates was isolated from C. annuum rhizosphere according to colony characters appeared on CAA, KB and water agar plates. From the preliminary round of screening for antagonism in Petri plate assay, only four isolates were selected for further study based on the inhibition zone (Table 1). Among these isolates, B. subtilis CA32 was selected for greenhouse pot experiments because CA32 was the most antagonistic isolate in terms of the inhibition zone in the plate assay. The inhibition of the mycelial growth was permanent. No: sclerotia were developed and the cytoplasm of the mycelium showed dramatic changes when observed under microscope (data not shown). Mycelium closest to the bacteria became yellow indicating some diffusible compounds from bacteria had reached this part of the mycelium (Fig. 1), Mycelial plugs obtained from the inhibition zone were not able to grow when transferred on to PDA plates thus indicating the fungi toxic nature of diffusible compound(s) produced by the bacterial strain CA32. Table [: Inhibitory activity of selected bacteria against R. solani on Petei plate assay Strains AB. subtilis CA32 14,240.52 14,540.32 CA28 4.10.25 CAMB 2.70.22 3. 12 CALO 5,540.30 3.80.28 ‘Inhibition zone is the distance of inhibition between growth of the fungal and bacterial colonies on plates. The values are the mean of 9 replications from 2 experiments Plant Pathol. J., 8 (1); 9-16, 2009 Effect of antagonists on Rhizoctonia disease of chili and brinjal: All the biological control treatments showed variation in plant disease severity compared to inoculated control (Table 2). In most of the treatments, the disease severity was reduced significantly (p = 0.05) in most of the biocontrol treatments compared to disease control. Bacterial seed treatment alone significantly reduced the disease severity on both chili and brinjal where the disease severity ratings were 2.20 and 2.15 for chili and brinjal, respectively. When 7. harzianum RUOI alone applied to seeds prior to sowing significant plant protection was not observed where disease severity rating was on average 4.25 and 4.80 for chili and brinjal, respectively after 30 days. However, when 7. harzianum RUOL was added to the soil disease severity was significantly reduced on both crops, Values observed for disease severity was a little bit higher in this case compared to that of the bacterial treatment although were not significant in all cases (Table 2). On the other hand, significant no protection was observed when Fig. 1: /n vitro antagonism of R. solani by Bacillus subtilis CA32 Table 2: Severity of root and collar rot (1-5) seale at 30 days okd chili and brinjal seedlings when the different treatment consisting of different mode of application of B. subsilixs CA32 and T. herziernuem RUOL Disease severity” Brinjal Treatments T, 1,000 T 485d Ty 2.20b T, 4.808 Ts 420d Ts. 2.55b T; 145a Ty 4.65d “The values representing disease severity are the means of 50 plants (data from three replicates were pooled and analyzed). The means followed by the same letters in cach column are not significantly different accordingly to Duncan's multiple range test at p = 0.05 B. subtilis CA32 was added to soil and values observed for disease severity were also similar in this treatment with T. harzianum RUOI applied to seeds. It was noticed that maximum disease suppression was observed when combined application of antagonists was used. Combine application of biocontrol agents, seed coating with B. subtilis CA32 and soil application of T. harzianum RUO1, resulted in the highest protection from R. selani in both crops where the lowest disease severity was recorded. However, combined seed application of T. harzianum RUOI with soil application of B. subtilis did not enhanced protection, being similar to that reached with seed application alone with T. harzianum RUO| (Table 2). Population dynamics of R. solani in soil and the rhizosphere: Application of either B. subtilis CA32 or T. harzianum RUO1 decreased population of the pathogen on the rhizosphere and in soil closer to the root system (bulk soil) respectively depending on the mode of application of the biological control agents. Application of B. subtilis CA32 alone on seeds significantly reduced the population of R. solani on roots (Table 3), However, T. harzianum RUO1 significantly reduced the population of R. solani in bulk soil (Table 4). The strongest reduction of R. solané in both rhizosphere and bulk soil was observed when two antagonists were applied in combination 8. subtilis CA32 and T. harzianum RUQI to seeds and soil respectively (Table 3, 4). ‘Table 3: A. solani population in the rhizosphere of chili and brinjal at day 30 Treatments Chili Brinjal_ Chili T, ND ND ND T: 5.50 5.008 Ts 2.50b - - Tt - - 4.508 4A85a Ts 4.95a 5.20a . Ts * * Tt 1.25¢ 1.10¢ Ty 4.250 385a_ ND: Not Detected, icates. Data followed by the same letters) in a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan's multiple range test at p = 0,05 alues are means of three rey Table 4: R. solani population in the bulk soil of chili and brinjal at day 30 Treaumems Chil Brinjal Chili Brinjal_ T ND ND ND ND T 7.250 6.508 6.008 7.280 3 6.20a 6.500 - - T - : 4.90b 4.850 Ts. 5.95a 5.20 - = Ts z : 1.20¢ 2.006 T; 2.100 2.28¢ 1.98 Ts 5.850 20 ib ND: Not Detected. Values are means of three replicates. Data followed by the same letler(s) in a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan’s multiple range test at p = 0.05 Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 DISCUSSION A few strategies have been suggested to reduce variability and enhanced the efficacy in biological control (Raupach and Kloepper, 1998; Guestsky er af., 2002). Among them applying several biocontrol agents simultaneously is one of them. Several reports have demonstrate the use of more than one biocontrol agents to control different plant pathogens in different crops (Sid Ahmed et al., 2003; Kim ef al., 2008). In this study, two beneficial microorganisms 8. — subtilis CA32 and T. harzianwn RUOL were tested for their ability to suppress damping-off of chili and brinjal caused by R. solani at the seed-bed stage under greenhouse conditions. R. solani strain used in the study significantly increased the disease severity. Results of the present investigation revealed potentiality of two biological control agents in reducing the disease severity in two Solanacious crops, chili and brinjal, caused by R. solani depending on their mode of applications. Bacterization of seeds resulted significant plant protection but seed application of T. harzianum RUOI did not provide significant protection although 7. harziamnum RUOI antagonizes R. solani in vitro. On the other hand soil application of B. subtilis CA32 was not effective for protecting both crops. However, 7. harzianuim RUOL when applied to soil gave better protection than seed bacterization. This indicated the importance of the mode of application of biological control agents in order to achieve in situ biological control ability. Some other reports also demonstrate bacterization of different seeds with rhizobacteria and application of Trichoderma sp. to provide disease suppression in chili including R. solani as the challenging pathogen (Sid Ahmed ef al., 2003; Rini and Sulochana, 2006) but to our knowledge no reports are available on brinjal and co-application of biocontrol agents in combination with Bacillus sp. and Trichoderma sp. isolates against R. solani. In the event of antagonism it is essential that growing together of antagonistic and target organisms at the near vicinity or interact each organism at least by means of antagonistic compounds produced by the biocontrol agent with the target organism. In this context, the population of the biocontrol agent should be maintained in the rhizosphere at least at the threshold level (Raaijmakers et al., 1995), In some cases, the population of biocontrol agent in the rhizosphere and the biocontrol activity seems to be directly correlated (Weller, 1988). Therefore, one of the possible explanations for the difference observed in this study could be due to the unavailability of suitable level of biocontrol agent at the suitable time in order to suppress the pathogen of BL subritis CA32 and at different time point after Table 5: Plant root colonization abi T. harzianum RUOL on ch application via different mode of application Logi, (CFU/g roots) B. subtilis CA32 Treatments - — Th 6.20b 8.254 ND ND ND Ty ND ND ND 4.25¢ 3.25¢ 4.50c Ts 3.80 3.20 3.25¢ ND ND ND Ts ND ND ND 6.25b 8.50 9,758 T 6.25b 9.254 9.00 6.50b 8.754 9.254 T, 3.25¢ 3.50 2.98 4.25¢ 3.50 3.80¢ ND: Not Detected, Walues are means of three replicates, Data followed by the same lewter(s) in a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan's multiple range test at p = 0.05 development. The population density differences of the two biocontrol agents used in this study supports this hypothesis because 8. subtilis CA32 maintained bacterial population around 10° cfu/plant but 7. harzianwmn RUOL population in the rhizosphere on both crops was much lower when conidia added to seeds prior to (Table 5). Most probably seed bacterization with physiologically active bacteria would take the advantage of vigorous root colonization of bacteria that did not happen when application in soil. Moreover conidia application to the seeds would take some time to germinate and colonize throughout the root system. Therefore, bacteria would take the advantage over the fungal biocontrol agent when applied them as seed treatment. On the other hand soil application of bacteria could have been disappeared from the rhizosphere via percolation or exclude by the niche due to the microbial competition thereby deprived from the biocontrol ability. Among the different strategies of application of biocontrol agents used in this study, seed bacterization with B. subtilis CA32 in combination with soil application of T. harzianum RUOL was found to be the most effective in terms of the lowest disease severity achieved by biocontrol agents. In this combination, apparently the bacterial biocontrol agent would be mainly responsible for rhizosphere protection while the fungal biocontrol agent responsible for providing the control effect in soil surrounding the root system rather than rhizosphere. To support this hypothesis the observation made this study on the population density of R. selani on rhizosphere and soil while adding bacteria and fungal biocontrol agent to seed and soil respectively alone and in combinations provides evidences to elucidate this effect. It has been observed that the number of &. solani propagules in the roots of the host plant is much lower when seeds were bacterized than that reached when added to the soil or also adding 7. harzianum to seeds. At the same time, . solani propagules in the bulk soil were much lower sown Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 when T. harzianwm applied to soil than that reached when bacteria was also applied to the soil. This effect would work synergistically when two biocontrol agents are applied in the appropriate combination and thus resulted in a better plant protection. The main conclusion of this study is that the biocontrol agents, B. subtilis CA32 and T. harzianum RUO1, despite of their different nature, are synergistic and can be added together via different mode of applications to produce a greater effect on the pathogen. The in vivo assay confirmed that the antagonists are more effective in combination than when acting individually if applied in proper manner to protect chili and brinjal from root and collar rot caused by R, solani. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This study was supported by research grant RG/B06/2001 from National Science Foundation (NSF) of Sri Lanka. REFERENCES Askew, D.G, and M.D. Laing, 1993. An adapted selective medium for the quantitative isolation of Trichoderma species. Plant Pathol., 42: 686-690. Bissett, J., 1991, A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Intrageneric classification. Can. J. Bot., 69: 2357-2372. Brewer, M.T. and R.P. Larkin, 2005. Efficacy of several potential biocontrol organisms against Rhizoctonia 24: 939-950. solani on potato, Crop Prot Ezziyyani, M., M.E, Requena, C.E. Gilabert and MLE. Candela, 2007. Biological control of phytophthora root rot of pepper using Trichoderma harzianum and Streptomyces rochet in combination. J. Phytopathol., 155: 342-349. Fogliano, V., A. Ballio, M. Gallo, S. Woo, F. Scala and M. Lorito, 2002. Pseudomonas lipopeptides and fungal cell ~—-wall-degrading = =enzymes act synergistically in biological control. Mol. Plant Micro. Interact. 15: 323-333. Guetsky, R.. D. Shtienberg, Y. Elad, E. Fischer and A. Dinoor, 2002. Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with — several mechanisms of disease suppression. Phytopathology, 92: 976-985. Handelsman, J. and E.V. Stabb, soilborne plant pathogens. 8: 1855-1869. 1996. Biocontrol of The Plant Cell, Kim, Y.C, H. Jung, K.Y. Kim and $.K Park, 2008. An effective biocontrol ~~ bioformulation —_ against Phytophthora blight of pepper using growth mixtures of combined chitinolytic bacteria under different field conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 120; 373-382. Kudagamage, C., IJ. De Zoysa and W-K.I. Priyadarshani, 2003. Identification and Management of Pests and Diseases of Low Country Vegetables. Horticultural Crop and Development _ Institute, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, pp: 127 (In Sinhala). Mao, W., J.A., Lewis, R.D., Lumsden and K.P. Hebbar, 1998. Biocontrol of selected soilborne diseases of tomato and pepper plants. Crop Prot., 17: 535-542. Nakkeeran, S., K. Kavitha, G. Chandrasekar, P. Renukadevi and W.G.D. Fernando, 2006. Induction of plant defence compounds by Pseudomonas chloreraphis PA23 and Bacillus subtilis BSCBE4 in controlling damping-off of hot pepper caused by Pythium aphanidermatum, Biocon. Sci. Tech., 16: 403-416, Palleroni, N.J., 1984. Bergy’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins. Pierson, E.A. and D.M. Weller, 1994. Use of mixtures of fluorescens pseudomonads to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology, 84: 940-947, Raaijmakers, J.M., M.M.P. Van Oorschot, I. Van der Sluis, B. Schippers and P.A.H.M. Bakker, 1995. Dose- response relationship in biological control of fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas sp. Phytopathology, 85: 1075-1081. Ramamoorthy, V., T. Raguchander and R. Samiyappan, 2002. Enhancing resistance of tomato and hot pepper to Pythium diseases by fluorescent pseudomonads. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 108: 429-441, Raupach, G.S. and J.W. Kloepper, 1998. Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology, 88: 1158-1164. Rini, C.R. and K. K. Sulochana, 2006, Management of seedling rot of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) using Trichoderma sp. and fluorescent pseudomonads (Pseudomonas fluorescens). J. Tropical Agric. 44: 79-82, Ahmed, A. C. Perez-Sanchez, C. Egea and M.E. Candela, 1999. Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum for controlling root rot caused by Phytphthora capsici in pepper plants. Plant Pathol., 48: 38-65. Research seed treatment with Sid Plani Pathol. J., 8 (1): 9-16, 2009 Sid Ahmed, A., M. Ezziyyani, C. Perez-Sanchez, C. Egea Szezech, M. and M. Shoda, 2004. Biocontrol of and M.E. Candela, 2003. Effect of chitin on biological Rhizoctonia damping-off of tomato by Bacillus control activity of Bacillus sp. and Trichoderma subtilis combined with Burkholderia cepacia. harzianum against root rot disease in pepper J. Phytopathol., 152: 549-556. (Capsicum annuam) plants, Eur. J. Plant Pathol., Weller, D.M., 1988. Biological control of soil borne 109: 418-426. pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu. Sneh, B., L. Burpee and A. Ogeshi, 1991. Identification of Rev. Phytopathol., 26: 379-407. Rhizoctonia Species. Ist Edn., St. Paul, Minnesotta, APS Press, USA., pp 133. Spadaro, D. and M.L. Gullino, 2005. Improving the efficacy of biocontrol agents against soilborne pathogens. Crop Protec., 24: 601-613.

You might also like