RCD SOIL REPORT AT 300M

RNOSC261223D
REPORT ON
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
WORK NAME
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD ALIGNMENT FOR 2 LANE 2 LANE WITH
PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET TO FIRING
RANGE (BARIATU) INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF
NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING OWNERSHIP
DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER LATEST GUIDELINES, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION
PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION PROPOSAL ETC AS REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND.
TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
LOCATION
BRIDGE AT 300 M
BH.NO LATITUDE LONGITUDE

1 23.42035793° 85.34944633°
2 23.420430° 85.34907°
CLIENT NAME
ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARMENTFIELD SURVEY DIVISION, ADVANCE PLANNING,
ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT RANCHI.
GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
SUBMITED TO
MARS PLANNING & ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.
287/C YASH PADM BESIDE HILL TOP MOTORS ASHOK NAGAR, RANCHI 834002, JHARKHAND,
INDIA. JHARKHAND@MARSCONSULTANCY.COM
DEC-,2023
INVESTIGATION DONE BY
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
(AN ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 CERTIFIED, NABL ACCREDITED LAB)
Of f i c e- B a n k o f I n d i a C ol o n y, N e a r J a i Sh r e e G a s G o d o w n , S o u t h D / S S, P .O . - B . V . C o l l e g e R a j a B a z a ar ,
P a t na - 8 0 0 0 1 4 , M ob + 9 1 947 2 9 0 9 2 8 7 . I GS T N o: - 1 0 B ZI P P 5 8 5 8 H 2Z 4, P A N N o:- B Z I P P 58 58H
Email-info@omsaiconsultantsandlaboratory.com, Gmail- omsaiconsultantspatna@gmail.com
This document is the property of Om Sai Consultants

Any unauthorized employment or reproduction, in full or part is forbidden.
CONTENTS
Sr
Description Page No.
No
1. Introduction 1
2. Scope of work 1
3. Execution of field work 1-2
4. Sampling 3
5. Laboratory tests 3
6. Presentation of test results 4
7. Soil stratification 4
8. Foundation analysis 4
9. Recommendations & calculation 4-9
10. Abbreviation & i.s classification 10-11
11. Side Photograph 12-13
Appendix-B,C,D
[Containing Figures and Tables]
Appendix Description
B. Field Test Observations & Laboratory Test Results
C. Graph of Grain size Analysis
D. Tri-axial shear / Direct shear strength test curves
E. e-log p’ Curves from Consolidation Tests .(Not Required)
Certified that this report contains pages l to ------- and further all the test has been conducted
with high degree of reliability .and accuracy
Signature of Authorized ------------------------------------
0fflce Seal of Soil Consultant

Report on Sub Soil Investigations for the
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN
FIELD ALIGNMENT FOR 2 LANE 2 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET
TO FIRING RANGE (BARIATU) INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND
BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING OWNERSHIP DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER LATEST GUIDELINES,
RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION PROPOSAL ETC AS REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF
JHARKHAND. TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
INTRODUCTION
The Geotechnical Investigation work was entrusted and the ground sample collection and
laboratory tests and report preparation were completed work was conducted by
M/S Om Sai Consultants, Patna/Ranchi (Bihar/Jharkhand) .
The subsoil investigations reported herein were taken up to find out the nature of subsoil at the
site of the proposed construction and to recommend the capacity and type of its foundation. After
certain tests on the soil, as detailed below, the desired recommendations have been start on
page 4 of this Report.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

2.1 To investigate the subsurface soil conditions at the proposed Two point is carried out at the
Construction area. The detailed scope of investigation for this site is as follows.
2.2 Setting up boring rig at each bore hole location and boring 150 mm diameter bore holes through all
kinds of soils.
2.3 Conducting Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) at an interval of 1.50m and collecting soil samples
from split spoon sampler.
2.4 Arranging all soil samples in the core boxes as per the borehole logging, labeling sealing properly
in sequence indicating number of SPT sample, depth, and number of blow of each SPT samples.
2.5 Transporting the selected soil samples to the laboratory for conducting tests as per the scope of the
work.
2.6 Analysis and interpretation of field & laboratory test data for the preparation of Geotechnical
investigation report.
3.0 EXECUTION OF FIELD WORK

3.1 Location: The borehole is executed as per the Client’s location plan.
3.2 Period of Execution: The fieldwork was commenced on Dec-2023.
3.3 FIELD METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION
3.3.1 Erecting and setting up of Boring rig

At each bore hole location as per the Client’s location plan, Rotary type boring rig was shifted,
assembled and erected
1
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
BANK OF INDIA COLONY, NEAR JAI SHREE GAS GODOWN,
SOUTH D/SS P.O. B.V. COLLEGE,RAJA BAZAR PATNA, BIHAR-800014
3.3.2 Boring in Overburden

Boring was done in accordance with IS: 1892 -1979. Standard rotary type drilling rig
coupled with 8 H.P capacity diesel engines, which is fitted to a tripod frame and with all drilling
accessories was used for boring. The rig deployed was generally suitable for all Geotechnical
Investigation work and had an arrangement for driving and extraction of casing, boring and drilling by
mud circulation method. Collecting D/S, UDS, conducting SPT test with this rig was possible.
Rotary method of boring was used for boring in soil. Boring was commenced by driving a SX
casing. Boring was carried out in soil using 6” dia core barrel up to the top of the hard surface.
Diameter of the borehole in soil was 150mm. SX casing was lowered in overburden as boring
progressed. Advancement of borehole in soil was done by removing soil with help of water circulation
under rotary action of the Core barrel.
Boring in all types of soil was continued till the hard stratum was met with. Standard
penetration tests were conducted at an interval of 1.50m.
3.3.3 IN –SITU TESTS IN OVERBURDEN
During investigation Insitu tests were carried out. Standard penetration tests were conducted in
overburden. Undisturbed and Disturbed soil samples were collected by split spoon sampler in SPT test
for field observations and to determine the index properties from laboratory tests. The methodology of
conducting SPT test was described below.
3.3.4 Standard Penetration Test (SPT):
SPT’s were conducted as per IS 2131-1981.Disturbed Samples were collected through Split
Spoon Sampler at 1.5m interval. A standard split spoon sampler was driven at the bottom of the hole.
The penetration resistance in terms of blows for300mm penetration of the split spoon sampler was
measured as ‘N’ Value.
The blowswere imparted by a standard weight of 63.5 kg falling through a height of 750
mm.The resistance was measured for 150 mm, 300 mm and 450 mm penetrations. The resistance of
first 150 mm was ignored and the resistance of next 300 mm was recorded as standard penetration
value ‘N`. If the sampler was driven less than 450 mm (total) then the penetration resistance was given
for the last 300 mm of penetration. If the penetration depth was less than 150 mm and the blow count
was more than 50 then the ‘N’ value was considered as ‘Refusal’ or more than 100 blows for less than
30cms penetration.
3.3.5 INDIAN STANDARD CODES USED FOR THE FIELD INVESTIGATION
Field Geotechnical investigation was executed in accordance with the Indian standard
Codes listed below.
a) IS: 1892: Code of practice for subsurface investigation of foundation
b) IS: 1498: Classification and identification of soil for general engineering purpose.
c) IS: 2131: Method for standard penetration test for soil
d) IS: 6926: Code of Practice for Diamond Core Drilling for Site Investigations
e) IS: 4464: Code practice for Presentation of drilling information and core description
in foundation investigation.
f) IS: 10208: Specification for diamond core drilling equipment.
g) IS: 6935: Method of Determination of water level in boreholes.
2
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
4.1.1 Sampling
4.1.2 Undisturbed Soil Samples
Open drive samplers of 100-mm diameter and about 450-mm length were used for
obtaining undisturbed samples of cohesive soils. The collection, sealing, labeling and
transportation of the samples to the laboratory were done as per the IS guide-lines.
4.2.3 Disturbed Soil Samples
Disturbed soil samples were collected at suitable intervals of depth (not more than
2.5 m) and at all depths of change in the nature of the subsoil. These samples were
sealed in polythene bags with proper identification labels.
5. LABORATORY TESTS
Some or all of the following laboratory tests, as necessary, were done on the collected
soil samples. Representative soil samples were selected for this from the different soil
strata encountered during boring. The tests were performed as per the relevant Indian
Standard Codes of Practice.
(a) Natural moisture content

(b) Bulk density
(c) Grain size analysis (using sieves and / or hydrometer)
(d) Specific gravity of soil solids
(e) Atterberg’s limit tests (liquid, plastic and shrinkage limits)
(f) Shear Tests :
 [I] Triaxial compression test (unconsolidated – undrained), generally for fine-

grained soils
 [II] Unconfined compression tests, only on cohesive soils
 [III] Direct shear tests, generally for coarse-grained soils
(g) Other tests as and when required.
3
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
6. PRESENTATION OF TEST RESULTS

The field and laboratory test are given in the Appendix B.
7. SOIL STRATIFICATION
The Two bore holes sunk at the site and the results of field and laboratory tests
conducted on the collected soil samples indicate that the soil stratification at the site
is as describe below.
The sub soil is Greyish Clayey Silt Mix With sand , Greyish silty Fine Sand,(CL-
ML/SM) Soft Weathered Rock & Hard Rock up to the investigated depth of 15m, below
GL.
Ground water table is struck 3.4m, & 7.7m, bgl in Dec 2023.
8. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
The safe bearing capacity of foundation of any type and size may be determined on
the basis of the soil data given in this Report by using the standard methods of
foundation design and following the relevant Indian Standard Codes. In the present
case, shallow foundations may be provided.
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed structure may be provided with shallow foundation as per soil bearing
capacity. [Strip, square or raft].& Plane Pile Capacity
The net allowable bearing pressure of a footing of any size and depth may be
calculated by standard methods using the relevant BIS Code and soil properties
reported herein.
The values of net allowable bearing pressures of foundations of certain sizes have
been calculated [vide sample of Calculation in Appendix - F] and are tabulated below.
4
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
SAMPLE CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION

The determination of the net safe bearing capacity, qns, is done on the basis of the shear failure
criterion after dividing the value of the net ultimate bearing capacity qnf , calculated as described below, by
a suitable factor of safety. The net soil pressure, q s , for a given permissible settlement is then calculated as
explained in the next section. The lower of the two values, qns and q s , thus determined is taken as the
allowable bearing capacity of the soil.
1. Shear Failure Criterion :

The net ultimate bearing capacity qnf (t/m2) of a shallow foundation of breadth B (m) and
depth D (m) is given as per IS:6403-1981 (Sec.5.1.2) by the following equation :
qnf = c Nc sc dc Ic + q (Nq - 1) sq dq Iq + 0.5  B N s d I w

where c = cohesion (t/m2 )
 = unit weight of subsoil (t/m 3 ) [submerged unit weight, ’, is taken where so applicable]
q = effective surcharge (t/m 2 ) =  D
Nc ,N,Nq = bearing capacity factors, which are functions of  the angle of internal friction of the
soil. s c ,sq ,s = shape factors
dc ,dq ,d  = depth factors related to cohesion, surcharge and density of subsoil
respectively
Ic ,Iq, I = inclination factors
w = water table factor (= 0.5 to 1.0 ) depending on the depth, Dw of water table [vide Table below].
The bearing capacity factors (N’s) are functions of  the angle of internal friction of the soil. The values
of these factors are found for general shear failure by referring to standard tables. If subsoil conditions are
such as to lead to local shear failure, the values of these factors are found for a reduced value of angle of
internal friction ( ’) given by the equation : tan ’ = 0.67 tan  The value of cohesion is also reduced to
c’ = 0.67 c.
The values of the other factors in the above equation for usual conditions are as tabulated below :
0.5
sc = 1.3 1+0.2B/L 1 dc = 1+ 0.2 (Nf ) D/ B Dw at G.L. Fou'dn.Level
o
sq = 1.2 1+0.2B/L 1 dq =d 1 for f<10 w = 0.5 1
0.5 o
sg = 0.8//0.6 1-0.4B/L 1 dq =d 1+ 0.1(Nf ) D/ B f>10 Interpolation between
FOR sq.// O Rect. STRIP Ic ,Iq, I = 1 for vertical load these values is linear.
In the present case, the representative values of cohesion © and angle of internal friction (
may be obtained from the soil data given earlier. Full submergence of the soil has been assumed. The safe
bearing capacity, qns has been obtained by dividing qnf by a safety factor, 3.
One example of calculation of safe bearing capacity for a certain shape, depth and width of a footing
is given in Table A on the next page. The net safe bearing capacity for the footing is entered in the last
column of Table A. Calculations for other depths and widths of footings are done similarly.
The value of net safe bearing capacity (qns ) calculated for each set of values of B and D is used for
calculating the consolidation settlement s as explained in Sec. 2 below.
5
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
One example of calculation for a certain depth and width of a strip or square footing is given
in the Table A on the next page. Full submergence of the soil has been assumed. The safe bearing
capacity, qns has been obtained by dividing qnf by a safety factor, 3. The net safe bearing capacity for
a footing of the selected size and depth of footing is to be seen in its last column. Calculations of safe
bearing capacities for other depths and widths of footings are done similarly.
2 Calculation of allowable bearing capacity based on settlement criterion
The net soil pressure, qs (t/m2) for a permissible settlement of 25 mm is give by Teng’s formula:
2
qs = 3.5 [N’’ – 3] [ (B + 0.3)/ 2 B] w’ Fd t/m2
where N’’ = corrected value of N from SPT
Fd = [1 + D/B] < or = 2
D, B and w’ are as defined before.
For a permissible settlement of S mm, the allowable bearing capacity
q’s = S qs /25
The corrected SPT N” values used in the calculations based on the above formula for different
depths below G.L. may be found from the recorded data.
The N” value used in any case is to be for the influence zone below the footing, which depends
on its width. A sample of calculation of the allowable soil pressure for the chosen size and depth of
footing and for the permissible settlement is given in Table B in the next section
6
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Table 1 : Allowable Net Bearing Pressures [ qna ] and Settlements Expected [s]
Net allowable bearing pressure (t/m2) for

Maximum expected
Depth (m) Width (m)
settlement (mm)
Strip footing Square footing Raft footing
2.0 50
12.2 14.9 --
3.0 3.0 50
11.8 14.1 --
10.0 15.3 75
-- --
2.0 -- 50
14.5 17.7
4.0 3.0 50
13.7 16.5 --
10.0 75
-- -- 17.0
2.0 50
17.0 20.7 --
5.0 3.0 50
15.8 18.9 --
10.0 75
-- -- 18.6
Notes :
1. If a subsoil condition much different from those reported herein is met with during foundation
trenching or piling, suitable steps should be taken.
FOR OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Authorize Signatory
(Er. K.N. Parihar)
7
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
* SAMPLE CALCULATION
The net safe bearing capacity for the footing is to be seen in the last column of the above Table
Aand B. This value is checked for settlement as shown below.
Table A Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Shape of F.S.= , t/m3= c= = Nc = Nq = N
Foundation: Square 3 1.89 1.3 16.2 11.77 4.42 3.15
D [m] B [m] dc dq = dg c q I Term II Term III Term qnf qnf /F
3 2 1.40 1.1996 1.3 2.835 27.83 13.95 2.86 44.63 14.88
Table B Calculation of Settlement

The adjoining Table and the
D B Fd = N" w' qs =25 S qs = S comments
2 2
m m t/m mm t/m below it are for a footing of depth, D=
3 2.0 2 16 0.5 15.0434 50 24.0695 3 m, and width, B [m] = 2.0
2
The value of allowable bearing pressure from the above Table for s = 50 mm is = 24.1 t/m
2
The value of safe bearing capacity from shear criterion as found from Table A = 14.9 t/m
2
Hence the allowable bearing pressure for settlement, s= or < 50 mm will be = 14.9 t/m
8
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Table 1 : Safe capacities of Plane Piles (Tones)

Pile length below
GL (m)
0.9 m 1.0m 1.2 m
6.0 32.8 39.2 53.7
8.0 47.9 57.0 77.5
10.0 67.2 79.6 107.6
12.0 155.2 187.0 259.9
Notes:
.
1. If a subsoil condition much different from those reported herein is met with during foundation
trenching or piling, suitable steps should be taken.
2. DMC and tremie method of pile concreting should be adopted as the water table is near the
ground surface.
3. If u/r piles are provided, care should be taken to ensure proper formation of bulbs.
4. Shallow foundations or pile caps should be isolated from the surrounding expansive
soil of type CI by layers of compacted local sand.
5. As per the provisions of the IS Code, an appropriate number of piles must be subjected to routine
load tests to check the veracity of the above recommended values of the safe capacities of piles.
FOR OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Authorize Signatory
(Er. K.N. Parihar)
9
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
I.S.CLASSIFICATION
GW: Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixture or no fines.
GP: Poorly graded gravels or gravel sand mixture, little or no fines.
GM: Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures.
GC: Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-clay mixtures.
SW: Well-graded sands, gravely sands; little or no fines.

SP: Poorly graded sands or gravely sands, little or no fines.
SM: Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures.
SC: Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures.
ML: Inorganic silt and very fine sands rock flour; silty or clayey fine sands or
clayey silts with non-to low plasticity.
CL: Inorganic clays, gravely clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays of low plasticity.
OL: organic silts and organic silty clay of low plasticity.
MI: Inorganic silts, silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts of medium plasticity.
CI: Inorganic clays, gravely clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays of medium
plasticity.
OI: Organic silts and organic silty clays of medium plasticity.
MH: Inorganic silt of highly compressibility, micaceous or diatomaceous fine

sandy or silty soils, elastic silts.
CH: Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays.
OH: Organic Clays of medium to high plasticity.

Pt: Peat and other highly organic soil with very high compressibi
10
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
ABBREVIATIONS
EGL Existing Ground Level
SPT Standard Penetration Test
GWT Ground Water Table
BH Bore Hole
m Meter
mm Milli Meter
m3 Cubic Meter
HR Hard Rock
ksf Silt Factor
dsm Mean Scour Depth
m Mean Particle Size
Db Design discharge per m width
Leff Effective Linear Waterway flow
PP Passive Resistance
Kp Coefficient of Earth Pressure
t/ m Ton per meter
t/ m2 Ton per square meter
SPT ‘N’ Standard Penetration Test ‘N’ value
C Cohesion
RL Reduced Level
PI Plasticity Index
LL Liquid Limit
PL Plastic Limit
D Depth
Kg Kilograms
MPa Mega Pascal
11
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
12
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
13
RNOSC261223D
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
CALCULATION OF CAPACITY OF PLANE PILE for C/O BRIDGE AT 300 M
Based on IS:2911 (Part I, Sec. 2) 1979, Appendix B, Clause 5.3.1.1,
using both cohesion (c), in t/m2 and angle of internal friction ( fo ).
WHEN Pile diameter, D ( m)= 1.20 Area of pile base, Ap (m2) = 1.13 & circ'mf'r'nce ( in m) of pile base, j = 3.14 x D3.768
=
Surface area of pile's contact with soil, A (m2) = j x t where t = thickness of soil layer in contact with pile.
In CLAY: Skin friction in clay, Qs =acA, End bearing, Qb= Ap cp Nc, In SAND: Skin friction, Qs = KPmidA tan d, where K= 1
where Reduction factor, a,depends on N :-- where Nc=9 and d = f. End bearing, Qb = Ap(0.5 Dg Ng + PtipNq),
N= <4 4 to 8 8 to 15 >15 where P = overburden press.at mid-layer or pile tip , as the case be,
a= 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 and the values of Nq and Ng are to be taken from the IS Code.
*Max'm permissible P[t/m2] = 15 to 20 X pile diameter (D) X gsub
2
Total Ultimate capacity of pile, Qu = Qs + Qb. If factor of safety = 2.5 = 18 to 24 X gsub t/m .
Safe capacity of pile, Qsf = Qu / 2.5 16.38 to 21.84 t/m2.
Depth of Soil type p= Ptip Permissible A= Qs' (for Qs = Qb Qu (t) Qsf (t) Pile
o
soil layer gsub c a f t gxt =Sp Ptip Pmid jxt 1 layer) SQs' Uplift Uplift
Length
Compressi Compre
without without
on ssion
(m) t/m3 t/m2 [m] t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 m 2
t t t pile pile m
0.0 - 0.5 Clayey Silt weight
Not considered due to cut-off and very soft layers. weight
0.00 1.0 0.5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.5
0.5 - 2.0 Clayey Silt 0.89 1.3 1.0 16.2 1.5 1.34 1.34 1.3 0.7 5.65 8.44 8.44 2.0
2.0-4.0 Silty Fine Sand 0.91 1.7 1.0 16.9 2.0 1.82 3.16 3.2 2.2 7.54 17.95 26.39 4.0
4.0-6.0 Silty Fine Sand 0.86 0.0 1.0 28.1 2.0 1.71 4.87 4.9 4.0 7.54 16.13 42.52 91.68 42.52 134.20 17.0 53.7 6.0
6.0-8.0 Silty Fine Sand 0.86 0.0 1.0 28.6 2.0 1.72 6.59 6.6 5.7 7.54 23.51 66.03 127.71 66.03 193.74 26.4 77.5 8.0
Silty Fine Sand With
08.0-10.0 soft weathered rock
0.86 0.0 1.0 29.3 2.0 1.72 8.31 8.3 7.4 7.54 31.47 97.49 171.42 97.49 268.92 39.0 107.6 10.0
10.0-12.0 soft weathered rock 0.88 0.0 1.0 36.6 2.0 1.76 10.07 10.1 9.2 7.54 51.37 148.86 500.76 148.86 649.63 59.5 259.9 12.0
Qb for f Qb for c
Depth,d gsub fo * Ng * Nq # Qb c # Qb
6.0 0.86 28.1 16.96 14.88 91.68 0.0 0.00
8.0 0.86 28.6 18.24 15.73 127.71 0.0 0.00
10.0 0.86 29.3 20.21 17.00 171.42 0.0 0.00
12.0 0.88 36.6 62.03 40.76 500.76 0.0 0.00
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
SOUTH D/SS P.O. B.V. COLLEGE, RAJA BAZAR PATNA, BIHAR-800014
RNOSC261223D Appendix F1
Field TesT ObservaTiOns
&
labOraTOry TesT resulTs
(aPPendiX b)
Table 1 : FIELD TEST RESULT & OBSERVATIONS Table 1 : RESULT OF LAB TEST
Start Date : 24/12/2023 CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD ALIGNMENT FOR 2
LANE 2 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET TO FIRING RANGE (BARIATU) INCLUDING
Bore Hole No:-01 Latitude:23.42035793° REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING
longitude85.34944633° OWNERSHIP DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER LATEST GUIDELINES, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION PROPOSAL ETC AS
REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
Termination Depth:-15. m Depth of Water Table :-3.4m BGL
Method of Drilling: Rotary Drilling Dia of Bore Hole: 150mm Nominal
Compression Index (Cc )

(N/mm2)P/(D1.5D*½ ) IN
Particle Size Analysis Atterberg Limits In-Situ Triaxial /DS Test Rock sample test
UCS qc = 23*Is50 N/mm2

Moisture Content (%)
Dry Density (g/cm³)
PLS INDEX
Density (gm/cm³)
Plastic Limit (%)
Liquid Limit (%)
N- Value
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
IS
N/mm2
Type of Test
Notation of
Ø in Degree
Gravel (%)
Depth (m) Description of Strata Classificat
C Kg/cm²
Sand (%)
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
RQD %
TCR %
Soil Strata
ion
0.5
1.0
CL-ML
Graeyish Clayey Silt Mix

1.5 16.0 1.8 15.0 55.5 27.7 23.5 18.1 5.4 1.89 21.6 1.55 2.67 UU 0.13 16.2
With Sand
2.0
3.0 19.0 1.91 22.1 1.56 2.69 UU 0.17 16.9
3.5
4.0
4.5 23.0 0.0 73.8 17.5 8.7 1.85 22.4 1.51 2.63 DS 0.00 28.1
5.0
SM
6.0 Grayish Silty Fine Sandy 29.0 1.86 23.14 1.51 DS

7.0
7.5 38.0 0.00 28.6
8.0
9.0 45.0 0.0 72.4 18.4 9.2 N.P 1.86 22.43 1.52 0.00 29.3
10.0
WS (WASHOUT SAMPLE)
10.5 100.0 1.88 0.32 2.67 0.00 36.6

Soft Weathered Rock
11.0
27
12.0 >100
13.0
65 34 35 1.5
13.5 2.48 0.28 2.76
Harrd Rock
14.0
72 52 71.3 3.1
15.0
WS (WASHOUT SAMPLE) NP = Non Plastic, DS = Direct Shear Test, UU = Unconsolidated Undrained Test
CLAY SAND ROCK
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
RNOSC261223D BANK OF INDIA COLONY, NEAR JAI SHREE GAS GODOWN, SOUTH D/SS P.O. B.V. COLLEGE,RAJA BAZAR PATNA, BIHAR-800014 Appendix- B
FIELD N-Value Graph
Bore Hole No:-01
0.0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100
-1.5
-3.0
FIELD N- Depth in m below
Value Ground Level
-4.5
19 -3.0
-6.0
23 -4.5
29 -6.0 -7.5
38 -7.5
45 -9.0 -9.0
100 -10.5
>100 -12.0 -10.5

>100 -13.5
>100 -15.0
-12.0
-13.5
-15.0
-16.5
-18.0
-19.5
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Table 1 : FIELD TEST RESULT & OBSERVATIONS Table 2 : RESULT OF LAB TEST
Start Date :- 27/12/2023 CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD
ALIGNMENT FOR 2 LANE 2 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET TO FIRING RANGE
Bore Hole No:-02 Latitude:23.420430° (BARIATU) INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND
ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING OWNERSHIP DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER LATEST GUIDELINES, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION
longitude85.349077°
PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION PROPOSAL ETC AS REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
Termination Depth:-15m Depth of Water Table :-3.7m BGL
Method of Drilling: Rotary Drilling Dia of Bore Hole: 150 mm Nominal
(N/mm2)P/(D1.5D*½
Notation of Soil Strata
Particle Size Analysis Atterberg Limits In-Situ Triaxial /DS Test Rock sample test
UCS qc = 23*Is50
IS Classification
PLS INDEX
) IN N/mm2
N- Value
N/mm2
Compression Index
Plastic Limit
Type of Test
Content (%)
Depth (m)
Liquid Limit
Description of Strata
Dry Density
Ø in Degree
Gravel (%)
(gm/cm³)
C Kg/cm²
Plasticity
Sand (%)
(Cc )
Moisture
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
(g/cm³)
Density
Specific
Gravity
RQD %
TCR %
Index
(%)
(%)
0.5
1.0 Graeyish Clayey Silt
CL-ML
1.5 Mix With Sand 19.0 0.0 11.64 58.9067 29.4533 23.7 19.1 4.6 1.91 19.5 1.60 2.68 UU 0.16 16.8
2.0
3.0 25.0 0.0 74.8 16.8 8.4 1.84 19.8 1.54 2.62 UU 0.18 17.2
4.0
4.5 31.0 1.85 20.5 1.54 2.62 DS 0.0 28.4
5.0
SM
Grayish Silty Fine Sand

6.0 39.0 0 73.13 17.9133 8.95667 1.85 21.1 1.53 2.63
7.0
7.5 42.0 1.86 22.4 1.52 DS 0.0 29.2
8.0
9.0 100.0 N.P 37.1
10.0
10.5 Soft Weathered Rock >100 1.90 0.42 … 2.68
11.0
32.0
WS
12.0
13.0
68.0 37.0 50.6 2.2
13.5
Hard Rock
14.0
78.0 55.0 71.3 3.1
15.0 1.96 0.47 2.71
NP = Non Plastic, DS = Direct Shear Test, UU = Unconsolidated Undrained Test
CLAY SAND ROCK
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
FIELD N -Value Graph
Bore Hole No:-02
0.0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108
-1.5
FIELD
Value
N- Depth in m below
Ground Level
-3.0
25 -3.0
-4.5
31 -4.5
39 -6.0
42 -7.5
-6.0
100 -9.0
>100 -12.0 -7.5

>100 -13.5
>100 -15.0
-9.0
-10.5
-12.0
-13.5
-15.0
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
Graph of Grain size analysis
(appendix- C)
Report on Sub Soil Investigation for the proposed C/O
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD
(BARIATU) INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND
Table 2 [part B]: Grain Size Analysis Results [ for Bore hole No./ Depth in m shown thus: 1/1.5 ]
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
BH/depth,m Gravel, % Sand,% Silt, % Clay%

1/1.5 1.79 14.97 55.49 27.75
1/4.5 0.00 73.76 17.49 8.75
1/9.0 0.00 72.42 18.39 9.19
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
RNOSC261223D Appendix - C1
Report on Sub Soil Investigation for the proposed C/O
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD
(BARIATU) INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, COMPLETE LAND
Table 2 [part B]: Grain Size Analysis Results [ for Bore hole No./ Depth in m shown thus: 1/1.5 ]
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
BH/depth,m Gravel, % Sand,% Silt, % Clay%

2/1.5 0.0 11.6 58.9 29.5
2/3.0 0.0 74.8 16.8 8.4
2/6.0 0.0 73.1 17.9 9.0
OM SAI CONSULTANTS
RNOSC261223D Appendix - C2
TRIAXIAL / DIRECT SHEAR TEST PLOTS
BORE HOLE NO:- 01
Depth - 1.5m Depth - 3.0m Depth - 4.5 m

3.0 3.0 3.0
Cohesion - 0.13Kg/cm² Cohesion - 0.17Kg/cm² Cohesion - 0.00Kg/cm²
Angle of Internal Friction - 16.2° Angle of Internal Friction - 16.9° Angle of Internal Friction - 28.1°
Shear stress kg/cm²


2.0 2.0 2.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Normal stress kg/cm² Normal stress kg/cm² Normal stress kg/cm²
Depth - 10.5
m
Cohesion - 0.00Kg/cm²
Angle of Internal Friction - 36.6°
Depth - 7.5 m
3.0
Depth - 9.0 m 3.0
3.0 Cohesion - 0.00Kg/cm²
Angle of Internal Friction - 28.6° Angle of Internal Friction - 29.3°

2.0 2.0
2.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Normal stress kg/cm²
Normal stress kg/cm² Normal stress kg/cm²
OM SAI CONSULTANTS Proposed Construction Of

CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Office :- Bank of India Colony , Near jai Shree Gas OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD ALIGNMENT FOR 2 LANE 2 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR
Gowdon South D/SS P. O. - B.V. College Raja LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET TO FIRING RANGE (BARIATU) INCLUDING
Bazaar , Patna - 800014. REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES,
COMPLETE LAND ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING OWNERSHIP DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER
LATEST GUIDELINES, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION
PROPOSAL ETC AS REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
TRIAXIAL / DIRECT SHEAR TEST PLOTS
BORE HOLE NO:- 02
Depth - 3.0m
Depth - 1.5m
3.0
3.0
Cohesion - 0.16Kg/cm² Angle of Internal Friction - 17.2°

Shear stress kg/cm² Angle of Internal Friction - 16.8°
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Normal stress kg/cm²
Depth - 9.0 m
Depth - 7.5 m Angle of Internal Friction - 37.1°
Depth - 4.5 m 3.0 3.0
3.0 Cohesion - 0.00Kg/cm²

2.0 2.0
2.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Normal stress kg/cm²
OM SAI CONSULTANTS Proposed Construction Of

CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Office :- Bank of India Colony , Near jai Shree Gas OF EXISTING ROAD/ GREEN FIELD ALIGNMENT FOR 2 LANE 2 LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDER/ FOUR
Gowdon South D/SS P. O. - B.V. College Raja LANE CONFIGURATION ROAD FROM ASHIRVAD BANQUET TO FIRING RANGE (BARIATU) INCLUDING
Bazaar , Patna - 800014. REPLACEMENT OF CULVERTS AND BRIDGES, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CULVERTS AND BRIDGES,
COMPLETE LAND ACQUISITION PLAN INCLUDING OWNERSHIP DETAILS ALL COMPLETE AS PER
LATEST GUIDELINES, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN AND FOREST DIVERSION
PROPOSAL ETC AS REQUIRED, IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. TENTATIVE LENGTH -2.52KM
END OF THE REPORT

RCD SOIL REPORT AT 300M

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

RCD SOIL REPORT AT 300M

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RCD SOIL REPORT AT 300M

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RNOSC261223D

BH.NO LATITUDE LONGITUDE

This document is the property of Om Sai Consultants

3. Execution of field work 1-2

6. Presentation of test results 4

9. Recommendations & calculation 4-9

10. Abbreviation & i.s classification 10-11

11. Side Photograph 12-13

B. Field Test Observations & Laboratory Test Results

C. Graph of Grain size Analysis

D. Tri-axial shear / Direct shear strength test curves

E. e-log p’ Curves from Consolidation Tests .(Not Required)

Signature of Authorized ------------------------------------

0fflce Seal of Soil Consultant

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

3.0 EXECUTION OF FIELD WORK

3.3 FIELD METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION

3.3.1 Erecting and setting up of Boring rig

3.3.2 Boring in Overburden

(a) Natural moisture content

 [I] Triaxial compression test (unconsolidated – undrained), generally for fine-

6. PRESENTATION OF TEST RESULTS

SAMPLE CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION

1. Shear Failure Criterion :

qnf = c Nc sc dc Ic + q (Nq - 1) sq dq Iq + 0.5  B N s d I w

2 Calculation of allowable bearing capacity based on settlement criterion

where N’’ = corrected value of N from SPT

D, B and w’ are as defined before.

For a permissible settlement of S mm, the allowable bearing capacity

Net allowable bearing pressure (t/m2) for

FOR OM SAI CONSULTANTS

Table A Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Capacity

Shape of F.S.= , t/m3= c= = Nc = Nq = N

Foundation: Square 3 1.89 1.3 16.2 11.77 4.42 3.15

D [m] B [m] dc dq = dg c q I Term II Term III Term qnf qnf /F

3 2 1.40 1.1996 1.3 2.835 27.83 13.95 2.86 44.63 14.88

Table B Calculation of Settlement

3 2.0 2 16 0.5 15.0434 50 24.0695 3 m, and width, B [m] = 2.0

Table 1 : Safe capacities of Plane Piles (Tones)

6.0 32.8 39.2 53.7

8.0 47.9 57.0 77.5

10.0 67.2 79.6 107.6

12.0 155.2 187.0 259.9

FOR OM SAI CONSULTANTS

GP: Poorly graded gravels or gravel sand mixture, little or no fines.

GM: Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures.

GC: Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-clay mixtures.

SW: Well-graded sands, gravely sands; little or no fines.

SM: Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures.

SC: Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures.

OL: organic silts and organic silty clay of low plasticity.

OI: Organic silts and organic silty clays of medium plasticity.

MH: Inorganic silt of highly compressibility, micaceous or diatomaceous fine

OH: Organic Clays of medium to high plasticity.

GWT Ground Water Table

ksf Silt Factor

dsm Mean Scour Depth

m Mean Particle Size

Db Design discharge per m width