Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 1 Social Work Deviation (1)
Group 1 Social Work Deviation (1)
Group 1 Social Work Deviation (1)
Strain theory is a sociological concept that seeks to explain deviant behavior within society. It
was 昀椀rst developed by American sociologist Robert K. Merton in the 1930s and has since
been expanded upon by various scholars. The theory suggests that societal structures and
ins琀椀tu琀椀ons can create strains or pressures on individuals, leading them to engage in deviant
behavior as a means of coping with these strains.
Strain Theory is a criminological theory that suggests that people who experience strain or
stress are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. This strain can be caused by a variety of
factors, such as poverty, inequality, or discrimina琀椀on. According to this theory, when
individuals cannot achieve their goals through legi琀椀mate means, they may resort to criminal
ac琀椀vity as a way to cope with their frustra琀椀on and achieve their objec琀椀ves. Strain Theory has
been used to explain various forms of criminal behavior, including drug use, the昀琀, and
violence. (BRITANNICA.COM)
According to strain theory, there are various types of strain that individuals may experience:
1. Structural strain
This refers to the disconnect between societal goals (such as 昀椀nancial success, status,
etc.) and the legi琀椀mate means available to achieve these goals. When individuals are
unable to achieve success through conven琀椀onal means, they may resort to deviant
behavior.
2. Individual Strain
This relates to the internal pressures and con昀氀icts experienced by individuals when
they are unable to meet societal expecta琀椀ons or achieve their own goals. This could
include feelings of aliena琀椀on, frustra琀椀on, or anomie (a sense of normlessness or lack
of direc琀椀on).
3. Cultural strain
This refers to the disjunc琀椀on between cultural goals and the means available to
achieve them. When individuals are socialized to value certain goals but lack the
means to a琀琀ain them, they may experience strain.
Strain theory suggests that individuals respond to these strains in di昀昀erent ways, one of which may
be deviant behavior. Merton iden琀椀昀椀ed 昀椀ve possible modes of individual adapta琀椀on to strain:
1. Conformity
Individuals accept both societal goals and the means to achieve them, leading to
socially acceptable behavior
2. Innova琀椀on
Individuals accept societal goals but reject the legi琀椀mate means to achieve them,
leading to deviant behavior as they seek alterna琀椀ve means of success.
3. Ritualism
Individuals reject societal goals but con琀椀nue to adhere rigidly to the legi琀椀mate
means, resul琀椀ng in a sense of rou琀椀ne or ritualis琀椀c behavior without the aspira琀椀on
for success.
4. Retrea琀椀sm
Individuals reject both societal goals and the means to achieve them, o昀琀en
withdrawing from society and engaging in behaviors such as substance abuse or
homelessness.
5. Rebellion
Individuals reject both societal goals and the means to achieve them but seek to
replace exis琀椀ng societal structures with alterna琀椀ve ones.
CONCLUSION:
Overall, Strain theory is a useful tool for comprehending how societal structures and cultural
values can shape individual behavior, par琀椀cularly in the context of deviance and crime. Strain
theory posits that when individuals experience strain, they may experience frustra琀椀on and
resort to criminal ac琀椀vity as a means of achieving their objec琀椀ves
There are two keywords in the term that make its meaning clearer di昀昀eren琀椀al and associa琀椀on
Di昀昀eren琀椀al- The word di昀昀eren琀椀al implies that di昀昀erent kinds of associa琀椀ons will yield di昀昀erent
behavioral outcomes.
Cressey (1952) – “Persons acquire pa琀琀erns of criminal behavior in the same way they acquire
pa琀琀erns of lawful behavior- through learning in interac琀椀on with other persons. Contact with
delinquency or criminal behavior pa琀琀erns is the necessary condi琀椀on for criminality and that it is an
excess of contacts of this kind which causes criminality. “
The di昀昀eren琀椀al associa琀椀on theory was proposed by the American sociologist and
criminologist, Edwin Sutherland. Sutherland is associated with the in昀氀uen琀椀al Chicago School
of Sociology.
a) Learning the techniques of criminal behavior, which may some琀椀mes be very complicated.
b) Learning how to ra琀椀onalize or jus琀椀fy these acts to the self and to others.
5. The act of ra琀椀onalizing criminal behavior to the self (what Sutherland termed “speci昀椀c
direc琀椀on of mo琀椀ves”) 昀椀rst involves having an awareness of the law. It is only when
individuals understand that certain acts transgress the law, that they then begin to jus琀椀fy
such transgression to themselves. (for instance, by thinking that the act is a minor
transgression or it is a vic琀椀mless crime, and so on.
6. When the balance of such jus琀椀昀椀ca琀椀ons to the self of transgressions of the law (or legal code)
exceeds instances when one chooses to follow the law, a person becomes delinquent.
7. Learning by associa琀椀on is di昀昀eren琀椀al in nature, which is to say, the frequency, intensity,
dura琀椀on, etc. of such associa琀椀on varies, and is the deciding factor in the eventual in昀氀uence
of such associa琀椀on on a person.
8. Such learning of criminal behavior by associa琀椀on with others is no di昀昀erent than the manner
in which we learn all other pa琀琀erns of behavior in life. Which is to say, there is no special
manner in which criminal behavior is imbibed.
9. It is true that criminal behavior is driven by mo琀椀ves such as the need to ful昀椀l certain desires
and the cultural values one imbibes. However, this alone is not jus琀椀昀椀ca琀椀on enough as others
with similar needs and values may not engage in criminal behavior.
Social Control Theory suggests that people are naturally inclined to engage in criminal
behavior, and ins琀椀tu琀椀ons like the family, schools, and the criminal jus琀椀ce system, work
together to control individuals and prevent them from engaging in deviant behavior.
TRAVIS HIRSCHI
This theory was developed by Travis Hirschi in the late twen琀椀eth century and 昀椀rst published
by him in 1969. He stated that the presence or lack of e昀昀ec琀椀veness of social controls on
individuals were key in昀氀uences in their decisions to engage in criminal ac琀椀vity. Those who
commit crimes do so because they feel no obliga琀椀on to abide by the rules of a society to
which they have no allegiance or connec琀椀on.
Author of the Social Bond Theory • Hirschi was born in 1935 and graduated from University
of Arizona • His theories integrated di昀昀erent theories and a琀琀empted to disprove the
consistencies of other theories.
His theories show li琀琀le interest in race, gender, and class.
HIRSCHI'S PERSPECTIVES
BENEFITS
Consequences
ATTACHMENTS
The rela琀椀onships established with others, especially parents. A琀琀achments are formed
through the use of in琀椀mate communica琀椀on.
Parents can develop a method of indirect control. Which means, youngsters refrain from
deviant behavior because the parents rela琀椀onship is psychologically present. They do want
to disappoint.
People feel or would feel something they don't like. The cost of acquiring the want is severe
Social control strength a昀昀ects criminal ac琀椀vity. Social Bonds control the a琀琀rac琀椀on to illegal
tempta琀椀ons and ensure conformity. (Hancock, 2004)
COMMITMENT
The higher educa琀椀onal and occupa琀椀onal aspira琀椀ons an individual holds, the higher the cost
for turning to crime. Conforming to social standards becomes a higher priority in achieving
speci昀椀c set goals. (Lily, 2011)
It is only ra琀椀onal for a person to be concerned with his or her own self -interest.
INVOLVEMENT
People are less likely to be involved in criminal ac琀椀vity when involved in ac琀椀vi琀椀es such as
sports, school ac琀椀vi琀椀es, homework, and their recrea琀椀onal pursuits.
The less 琀椀me available for leisure equals less 琀椀me to get in trouble.
BELIEF
People with a strong moral belief in the law are less likely to engage in criminal ac琀椀vity.
Beliefs are based on a constant social reinforcement.
A fundamental understanding of right and wrong is crucial to reducing criminal ac琀椀vity.
Core Values
Social Control
Under the Social Control Theory, delinquency increases when the social bond between child
and society is broken.
The rela琀椀onship between the social environment and a琀�tudes contribute to adolescent
delinquent behavior.
Weakened social bonds are precursors to juvenile delinquency (Menasco, 2005).
Juvenile Delinquency
Crime rates are higher in juveniles and decline with age (Hopson, 2002).
There are at least 3 million juveniles under 18 arrested yearly of arrests (Menasco, 2005).
"A 70% increase of juveniles transferred to adult court between the late 1980s and the
beginning of the 1990s (Menasco, 2005 para3)."
Conclusion:
Juveniles need to be provided with the appropriate social bonds. Future crime rates can only
be a昀昀ected if the criminal jus琀椀ce system begins to apply the principles of the social control
theory. Give the youth of America set expecta琀椀ons, guidance, support, and the solu琀椀on
begins.