AGENDA: ADDRESSING RELOCATION WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON

REHABILITATION POLICY FOR KASHMIRI PANDITS

1. Letter from the Executive Board

2. Introduction of the Committee
3. Basic History of Kashmir 1947
4. The Kashmiri Pandits Exodus
a. The 1975 Indira-Sheikh Accord and the Early 1980s.
b. 1986: Kashmir Riots & Farooq Abdullah Re-Installation.
c. 1987-1990: J&K Elections Rigged, Militant Movement Rises.
d. 19 January 1990 & What Followed: The Darkest Night and the Exodus.

5. Relocation Policy
a. Importance of Refugee Issues in India
b. Understanding Refugees
c. Distinction Between Refugees and Other Foreigners
d. The Refugee Scene in India
e. Kashmiri Pandits
f. Refugee Status in India
g. Examples of Refugee Recognition and Policy
h. Evidence Required for Refugee Claims
i. India’s International Commitments
j. Refugees and the Indian Legal Framework

6. Otherways
7. Previous Efforts for Rehabilitation
8. Conclusion
 LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE BOARD
Greetings Delegates

The Executive Board welcomes you to NMIMS MUN. We want to thank

you in advance for the time and effort that you will put into this
committee. We look forward to an enriching and rewarding experience.

This guide will give you a brief about the agenda and the history of this
committee. This committee is yours, and the decisions it makes will be
yours as well. This background guide only acts as the starting point for
your research and we urge you to go above and beyond the limitations
that the guide contains. Such research combined with good
argumentation and a solid representation of facts is what makes an
excellent performance. In the session, the executive board will
encourage you to speak as much as possible, as fluency, diction or
oratory skills have very little importance as opposed to the content you
deliver. The foremost thing we expect from you is diplomacy.

All the best and feel free to contact us for any doubt and clarifications

Best,
Executive Board | Lok Sabha
Aditya Bhatt
Aman Khan
 INTRODUCTION OF THE COMMITTEE
The Lok Sabha, often referred to as the House of the People, is the lower
house of India's bicameral Parliament, with the Rajya Sabha being the
upper house. Established under the Constitution of India, the Lok Sabha
represents the democratic foundation of the country, embodying the
voice of the Indian populace.

Comprising elected members, the Lok Sabha serves as the primary forum
for legislative debates, policymaking, and the enactment of laws that
shape the nation's socio-economic and political landscape. Each member
represents a specific geographic constituency, elected through a process
of universal adult suffrage, where citizens aged 18 and above exercise
their right to vote in periodic general elections held every five years.

The Lok Sabha's composition is designed to reflect the diverse

demographic and cultural tapestry of India. With a total strength
determined by the Constitution, the house accommodates members
from various political parties and independent representatives, fostering
a pluralistic approach to governance. The Speaker, elected by the
members, presides over the Lok Sabha's proceedings, ensuring decorum,
fairness, and adherence to parliamentary norms.

The Lok Sabha exercises its legislative authority by deliberating on bills

proposed by the government or private members, scrutinizing them
through parliamentary committees, and ultimately voting for or against
their passage. Additionally, the house plays a crucial oversight role,
holding the executive branch accountable through question hours,
debates, and discussions on matters of public interest.

Furthermore, the Lok Sabha serves as a platform for representing the

concerns, aspirations, and grievances of the Indian populace, providing a
forum for elected representatives to articulate the needs of their
constituents and advocate for appropriate policy interventions.

In essence, the Lok Sabha stands as the cornerstone of India's

democratic framework, embodying the principles of representation,
accountability, and participatory governance. Through its deliberations
and actions, the house endeavors to uphold the democratic ideals
enshrined in the Constitution, thereby contributing to the nation's
progress, unity, and inclusive development.
 BASIC HISTORY OF KASHMIR 1947
British rule ended in the Indian subcontinent in 1947 . The Indian
subcontinent parted into three nation , Pakistan , India and Jammu
Kashmir.
Kashmir , at the moment, was ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh . A Hindu
emperor who decided to stay independent and not merge with neither
Pakistan nor India . The largest princely state had a predominantly
Muslim population . Pakistan made various efforts to persuade Hari Singh
to join Pakistan , followed by Mohammad Ali Jinnah who is believed to
write a letter to the maharaja in July 1947 promising “every sort of
favourable treatment”.

Faced with the Maharaja's indecision on accession, the Muslim League

agents worked in Poonch to encourage the local Muslims to an armed
revolt, exploiting an internal unrest regarding economic grievances. The
authorities in Pakistani Punjab waged a 'private war' by obstructing
supplies of fuel and essential commodities to the State. The Pashtun tribe
invaded Jammu and Kashmir in the beginning on October 22 1947
This made Maharaja Hari Singh helpless and request military assistance
from the government of India . To come up with an agreement , the
Maharaja signed an Instrument of Accession on October 26 1947which
was accepted by the governor later on. The Indian troops, which were
airlifted in the early hours of 27 October secured the Srinagar airport.
The city of Srinagar was being patrolled by the National Conference
volunteers with Hindus and Sikhs moving about freely among Muslims.

Article 370 was a provision in the Indian Constitution that granted

special autonomous status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir. It
allowed the state to have its own constitution, flag, and autonomy over
internal matters, except for defence, foreign affairs, finance, and
communications. Indian leaders, such as Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar
Patel, enacted Article 370, which conferred special status to Kashmir as
part of a negotiated agreement. The implementation of Article 370 was
deemed necessary to prevent the potential integration of Kashmir into
Pakistan. Without this provision, there was a risk that Kashmir, with its
predominantly Muslim population, might have chosen to accede to
Pakistan during the partition of India in 1947 or in subsequent years.
 THE KASHMIRI PANDIT EXODUS
The 1975 Indira-Sheikh Accord and the Early 1980s

An agreement, popularly known as the 1975 Indira-Sheikh Accord, was

signed between Kashmiri politician Sheikh Abdullah and the Prime
Minister of India Indira Gandhi.

It laid down measures for the integration of Jammu and Kashmir to

India, ensuring that it will continue to be governed under Article 370
of the Constitution, which gave the state an autonomous status as a
constituent of India

With the support of the Indian National Congress, National

Conference leader Sheikh Abdullah formed a government as chief
minister in 1975.

Shortly afterwards, Amanullah Khan and Mohammad Maqbool Bhat

gave birth to the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) in 1977,
whose goal was to work towards the 'liberation' of Kashmir from
India and Pakistan.

In 1982, Sheikh Abdullah died, and his son, Dr Farooq, succeeded him
as chief minister.

However, Farooq Abdullah's first stint as chief minister was short-

lived; he was defeated after an Indira Gandhi-led political coup in
1984. Jammu and Kashmir Governor Jagmohan Malhotra, dictated by
the Centre, orchestrated the replacement of Abdullah with his
brother-in-law Ghulam Shah, who had rebelled against his family and
pioneered another faction of the National Conference

Gul Shah formed the government with support from the Congress at
the state-level as well as the central.

The year 1984 also saw another crucial event that contributed
significantly to the rise of separatist insurgency in Jammu and
Kashmir: the hanging Maqbool Bhat, JKLF co-founder and a pioneer of
the secessionist movement.
 Jammu and Kashmir saw a pronounced rise in separatist violence
following the execution of Bhat. Public anger with the prevailing
regime also fueled the growth of the JKLF, which was supported by
Pakistan.

The Pakistani military and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) are said to

have provided weapons, training, and logistical support to the JKLF. A
section of Kashmiri Muslim youth was radicalized, armed, and tutored
in Islamic fundamentalism.

1986: Kashmir Riots & Farooq Abdullah Re-Installation

In 1986, during Ghulam Shah's tenure as Chief Minister, the

government ordered the construction of a mosque at the Civil
Secretariat premises in Jammu, reportedly on the site of an ancient
Hindu temple. This decision ignited protests among Jammu citizens,
who opposed what they saw as a violation of the site's historical and
religious significance. The incident emphasized the need for inclusive
decision-making and sensitivity to diverse heritage to foster social
harmony.

Further, in the same year, the Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress government

at the Centre unlocked the gates of the disputed Babri Masjid-Ram
Janmabhoomi temple for Hindu worship. Ripples of the move were
seen in Kashmir as well.

Consequently, riots broke out in Jammu and Kashmir. A large number

of Hindu houses were attacked, shops looted, and temples vandalized
in Vanpoh, Anantnag, and Sopore, among others. Anantnag, the
constituency of then Congress leader Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, bore
the brunt of the violence. Several Hindu temples and houses were
targeted in the city.

Following the communal riots, Governor Jagmohan dismissed the Gul

Shah government; Farooq Abdullah was subsequently re-installed as
chief minister.
1987-1990: J&K Elections Rigged, Militant Movement Rises

The 1987 Jammu and Kashmir Assembly elections are widely believed
to have been rigged to favor the Farooq Abdullah-led National
Conference government, supported by the Congress.

This electoral manipulation disillusioned many Kashmiri youth and

served as a catalyst for further insurgency in the region.

The founding of Hizbul Mujahideen in 1989, sponsored by Pakistan's

ISI, marked a significant shift in the nature of militancy in Kashmir.

Previously driven primarily by separatist sentiments, the emergence

of Hizbul Mujahideen introduced a more communal and jihadist
dimension to the conflict.

These developments contributed to the escalation of violence and

instability in Kashmir, with profound implications for the region's
political landscape and security situation.

In the same year, the JKLF abducted medical intern Rubaiya Sayeed,
the daughter of then Home Minister of the Janata Dal-led central
government, Mufti Mohammed Sayeed. In exchange for Rubaiya, five
JKLF associates were freed from jails.

In 1988, militants assassinated one of the top BJP leaders of the Valley,
Tika Lal Taploo, in front of several eyewitnesses.

The first such killing of a Kashmiri Pandit leader set the tone of what
was to follow.

In 1989, Neelkanth Ganjoo, the judge who had sentenced the JLKF's
Maqbool Bhat to death, was killed in a market near the Srinagar High
Court in broad daylight. Journalist-lawyer Prem Nath Bhat was shot
dead near his house in Anantnag shortly after.
19 January 1990 & What Followed: The Darkest Night and the Exodus

The VP Singh-led Janata Dal government at the Centre re-appointed

Jagmohan as the governor of Jammu and Kashmir, triggering his
political rival Farooq Abdullah's resignation from the post of chief
minister.

The first day of the governor's rule, 19 January 1990, saw the darkest
night in the history of the Kashmiri Pandit Exodus.That night, the
politically-disturbed Valley reverberated with war cries, communal
calls, and threats to Pandits.

"Ralive-Tsalive-Ya Galive" is a famous rallying call from the time,

translating to "convert-leave Kashmir-or perish."In a door-to-door
mission, Hindu homes were attacked, families killed, and many
women raped by militants.

With hastily packed belongings and terror in their hearts, Kashmiri

Pandits who survived the night fled the Valley on 20 January morning
and the weeks that followed, becoming refugees in their homeland.
As many as 75,343 Kashmiri Pandits are estimated to have fled in
January 1990, with about 70,000 more following till March, as per the
Kashmiri Pandit Sangharsh Samiti. As per the estimates, 650 Pandits
were killed during this time. (could be more)

One of the deadliest attacks on Kashmiri Pandits in the Valley took

place in 2003, more than a decade after the peak of the exodus

Armed militants, dressed in army fatigues, infiltrated a colony of

Kashmiri Pandits in Pulwama's Nadimarg on 23 March 2003. Twenty-
four Hindus, including two children, were lined up outside their
houses and shot dead by terrorists who belonged to the outfit,
Lashkar-e-Taiba

At the time of the carnage, People's Democratic Party (PDP) leader

Mufti Sayeed was the chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir, while an
Atal Bihar Vajpayee-led BJP government was at the Centre.
 ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
In 1990, during the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley, a BJP-
supported Janata Dal government was in power at the Centre.

Governor Jagmohan, appointed by this administration, was criticized

for his handling of the situation, particularly for failing to ensure the
safety of fleeing Kashmiri Pandits.

Instead of guaranteeing security, Jagmohan suggested to the Pandits

that if they chose to leave, refugee camps were available, and
departing civil servants would continue to receive their salaries.

Senior Indian administrator Wajahat Habibullah, stationed in

Anantnag in 1990 as Special Commissioner, appealed to Jagmohan at
the request of some Kashmiri Muslims to dissuade the Pandits from
leaving.

However, Jagmohan did not heed this appeal and instead indicated
that those who stayed behind would not be assured of their safety.

Kashmiri journalist Gowhar Geelani, in his work "Insulting Facts with

Fiction to Suit One's Narrative," highlights these events and criticisms
of Jagmohan's actions.

Despite the outcry and criticisms, no formal investigative bodies such

as a police commission, special investigation team (SIT), or judicial
panel were established to probe the events surrounding the
genocide-triggered exodus of Kashmiri Pandits.

This lack of official investigation has contributed to ongoing debates

and narratives regarding the exodus and its aftermath.

The failure to address the grievances and concerns of Kashmiri

Pandits during this period has left lasting scars on the community and
the region.

The events of 1990 continue to be remembered and discussed within

the context of Kashmir's complex socio-political landscape.
 AFTERMATH
Militancy in Kashmir escalated following the exodus of Kashmiri
Hindus, with insurgents targeting Hindu properties.

Indian Home Ministry data records 1,406 Hindu civilian fatalities from
1991 to 2005 due to militancy.

The Jammu and Kashmir government stated that 219 members of the
Hindu Pandit community were killed between 1989 and 2004, with
none reported thereafter.

The Kashmir Pandit Sangharsh Samiti (KPSS) reported 399 Kashmiri

Hindus killed by insurgents from 1990 to 2011, with 75% of the deaths
occurring in the first year of insurgency.

Panun Kashmir, representing displaced Hindus, advocated for a

separate Union Territory in Kashmir, known as Panun Kashmir, for the
resettlement of Kashmiri Pandits.

In 2009, the Oregon Legislative Assembly recognized September 14,

2007, as Martyrs Day to acknowledge atrocities against non-Muslim
minorities in Jammu and Kashmir by militants.

Kashmiri Hindus continue to seek their return to the Valley but face
challenges due to instability and security concerns.

Many Kashmiri Hindus live as refugees, unable to return due to fear

for their safety and loss of property.

Displaced Hindu families struggle with education due to

discrimination and lack of access to quality schools.

During the 2016 Kashmir unrest, transit camps housing Kashmiri

Hindus were attacked by mobs, leading to protests and demands for
evacuation.

Over 1300 government employees belonging to the Kashmiri Hindu

community fled the region during the unrest.

Posters threatening Hindus to leave Kashmir or face consequences

were allegedly put up near transit camps by militant organizations.
 Roots of Kashmir filed a petition in 2017 to reopen cases of alleged
murders of Kashmiri Hindus, demanding a special crimes tribunal and
compensation for displaced individuals.

RELOCATION POLICY

Importance of Refugee Issues in India:

There are significant aspects concerning refugees important to both

India and the refugees, especially in law enforcement contexts.

Due to the security scenario in India, influenced by neighboring roles,

the humanitarian matter of refugees is intertwined with national
security.

The role of law and order is under State jurisdiction, while

international relations and borders fall under the Union government.

Various agencies, both Central and State, handle refugee matters

related to law enforcement.

Security and immigration personnel at international borders, land

check posts, airports, and seaports, along with state police, are
involved in refugee-related law enforcement.

These personnel are responsible for enforcing national and internal

security laws without neglecting humanitarian aspects.

Understanding Refugees:

Refugees are individuals forced to flee due to circumstances beyond

their control, such as human rights violations, political insecurity,
violence, civil war, or ethnic strife.

The legal definition of a refugee is outlined in the United Nations 1951

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol.

A refugee is defined as someone with a well-founded fear of

persecution based on race, religion, nationality, social group, or
political opinion, outside their country of nationality and unable or
unwilling to avail themselves of that country's protection.
 Dealing with refugees requires considering humanitarian and human
rights aspects

Distinction Between Refugees and Other Foreigners:

It's crucial to distinguish refugees from other categories of foreigners

in India.

Three distinct groups of foreigners are different from refugees:

1. Temporary Residents, Tourists, and Travellers
2. Illegal Economic Migrants
3. Criminals, Spies, Infiltrators, Militants, etc.

Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) fleeing persecution within their

country are not refugees but fall under a different category.

The Refugee Scene in India:

India has a history of hosting refugees for centuries, embracing

diverse communities.

The country has received refugees from various nations, not limited
to neighboring countries. Notably, there have been no instances of
refugees originating from Indian soil except during the 1947 partition.

India has welcomed refugees from diverse religions and sects,

upholding its secular policies.

Kashmiri Pandits:

Kashmiri Pandits are a group forced to flee from Jammu and Kashmir
due to persecution.

They have settled in other parts of India as Internally Displaced

Persons (IDPs).

These individuals are not categorized as 'refugees' since they haven't

crossed international borders but fall under the 'internally displaced
persons' category.
Refugee Status in India:

India has historically dealt with refugee issues on a bilateral basis

without a specific statute.

Refugees are considered ‘foreigners’ and are governed by existing

Indian laws applicable to all foreigners.

Refugee status cases are assessed individually, often with the

assistance of UNHCR for background verification.

A refugee is defined as someone outside their country of nationality

due to a well-founded fear of persecution based on specific grounds.

Various legal “tests” determine genuine fear of persecution, focusing

on objective evidence and the risk of persecution.

India’s approach to refugee status is bilateral, considering the merit

and circumstances of each case.

Examples of Refugee Recognition and Policy:

India has accepted refugees based on international norms, such as

Afghan refugees and Sri Lankan Tamil refugees.

The government’s policy towards refugees varies based on

circumstances, often involving UNHCR assistance.

Instances where refugees are officially recognized, they receive

minimal interference.

The National Human Rights Commission has advocated for refugees

facing legal issues.
India’s International Commitments:

India is not a signatory to the 1951 Convention on refugees but has

ratified various UN Conventions on Human Rights.

India’s obligations towards refugees arise from these international

commitments.

Refugee rights under international conventions include freedom of

movement, seeking asylum, nationality, health, education, and
juvenile justice.

Refugees and the Indian Legal Framework:

Refugees encounter Indian laws governing their entry, stay, and legal
issues.

Constitutional provisions such as Article 21 apply to refugees,

ensuring fundamental rights like the right to life and personal liberty.

Indian courts have recognized UNHCR’s role in protecting refugees.

There are instances of courts staying deportation of refugees,

ensuring adherence to non-refoulement principles.

Legal remedies for detained refugees in “International Zones” at

airports are limited, often requiring administrative relief.

International treaties must be transformed into domestic law to be

applicable in India, ensuring harmonious construction of laws.
 OTHER WAYS
Entry into India:
India has a fairly liberal policy of granting refuge to various groups of
refugees, including Buddhists from Tibet, Hindus and Christians from Sri
Lanka, Hindus and Muslims from East Pakistan, Hindus, Muslims,
Christians, and Buddhists from Bangladesh, and Sikhs and Muslims from
Afghanistan. Entry is not determined by reasons of religion or
discrimination.

Work Permits:
There are no concept of work permits in India for refugees. However,
refugees who are granted residence permits can find employment in the
informal sector. Tibetan refugees have been granted loans for self-
employment, and Sri Lankan Tamils have freedom of movement within
camp areas for work.

Freedoms:
Refugees generally have freedom of movement, practice of religion, and
residence, as long as their entry into India is legal or subsequently
legalized. However, those who enter illegally or overstay face restrictions
in accordance with Indian statutes governing refugees.

Handling Refugees Legally:

Refugees are subject to Indian laws from the moment of entry.
Enforcement and security personnel must adhere to legal requirements.
It's crucial to understand each refugee's background and circumstances
to apply the law appropriately.

Various Situations and Options:

At the Point of Entry- Refugees often enter without valid documents.

They may face arrest but should not be denied entry outright. The
agency in contact with them should verify their claims and seek
assistance from UNHCR for verification.

Detention- Refugees may face detention upon illegal entry.

Authorities should consider the traumatic background of refugees
and seek UNHCR assistance for legal help.
 Lack of Medical Aid- Refugees in detention needing medical attention
should receive necessary care. Authorities can seek help from NGOs
or UNHCR.

Detention of Women and Children- Courts may release women and

children on bail. UNHCR assistance can help in cases of separation
from families.

Release from Detention- Refugees should not become "untraceable"

upon release. Courts may allow handing over to UNHCR for care.

Re-arrest Risk- After serving a sentence, refugees without valid

documents risk re-arrest. Police escort can be provided to secure
their travel for obtaining necessary documents.

Timely Legal Process- Timely filing of charge sheets is crucial for

refugees to plead guilty and seek early disposal of their cases.

Conclusion:
India, despite security concerns and population pressures, takes a
humanitarian view of the refugee problem. While there's no specific
Refugee Law, India adheres to UN and International Conventions through
executive and judicial interventions. Balancing security and humanitarian
obligations remain a challenge for security and law enforcement
agencies.
 PREVIOUS EFFORTS FOR REHABILITATION
The Indian Government have made efforts to rehabilitate Kashmiri
Hindus and invite them back to the region.

Since 2008, 1,800 Kashmiri Hindu youths have returned to the Valley
under a government package, but criticisms exist regarding the
adequacy of assistance.

R.K. Bhat criticized the government's efforts, claiming many returning

youths lived in poor conditions, and job vacancies remained unfilled.

A play titled 'Kaash Kashmir' highlights government apathy towards

the sufferings of Kashmiri Hindus, as noted by journalist Rahul
Pandita.

Farooq Abdullah's controversial remarks suggested that Kashmiri

Hindus should take the initiative to return, sparking disagreement
among Kashmiri Hindu authors and leaders.

The proposal for separate townships for Kashmiri Hindus faces

opposition from various groups, including Islamists, separatists, and
mainstream political parties.

Hizbul Mujahideen's Burhan Wani threatened to attack proposed

Hindu townships, describing them as resembling Israeli designs,
despite his welcoming of Kashmiri Hindus to return.

Burhan Wani's death was mourned by Kashmiri Hindus, and his

successor Zakir Rashid Bhat promised protection to returning Hindus.

In 2010, the Government of Jammu and Kashmir noted 808 Hindu

families still residing in the Valley, with efforts to encourage further
returns proving largely unsuccessful.

The employment package was extended to Hindus who did not

migrate out of the valley, aiming to address their economic concerns.

The Indian Government has facilitated the education of displaced

Kashmiri students in various schools and universities across the
country.
Some view the now-abrogated Article 370 as a hindrance to the
resettlement of Kashmiri Hindus due to restrictions on outsiders
settling in Jammu and Kashmir.

Sanjay Tickoo of the Kashmiri Pandit Sangharsh Samiti argues that

Article 370's abrogation should be addressed separately from the
issue of Kashmiri Hindu exodus.

The issue of Kashmiri Hindu rehabilitation remains complex and

sensitive, requiring nuanced approaches and careful consideration of
various viewpoints.

Overall, efforts to rehabilitate Kashmiri Hindus face challenges such

as political opposition, security concerns, and bureaucratic hurdles,
highlighting the need for continued dialogue and comprehensive
solutions
 CONCLUSION
The Kashmir issue has been the bone of contention between two
countries for ages and the people most severely affected by it are the
Kashmiris and the worst has been seen by the Kashmiri Pandits. many
cannot even afford the necessities of life. The Government needs to find
ways to improve the condition of Kashmiri refugees. If the financial
resources are limited, perhaps a re-allocation of financial resources can
be done. Accounts from Pandits living in miserable conditions of
deprivation in camps suggest a variety of tolls taken on them as a
community that range from the decline in their birth-rates, since the
accommodation in these camps allow so little privacy, to large numbers
suffering from mental illnesses, such as depression and paranoia.

The mental toll has also taken the form of extreme insecurity. For many
of them the experience of living in exile has been a humiliating one of
being reduced to the status of refugees, a term that has connotations of
mendicancy and social dishonour.

This sense of humiliation is often fed by surrounding communities who

do not welcome them as exiles amidst them; they see them as
threatening their jobs (given the Pandit records of literacy) and as
competitors for the political, social and economic resources of the state.

Even for those who have managed to recover from the economic losses
of migration, there is the intangible but not less real sense of loss that
comes from their separation from their homeland; it has meant severing
them from access to the places that were associated with their
ancestors, their cultural legacies, their personal and familial memories
and their own sense of pride in belonging to a land so widely celebrated
for its beauty, its traditions of learning and its spiritual and religious
sanctity.
 REFERENCES
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/kashmiri-pandit-
anniversary-return-9116074/
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/4-reasons-why-minorities-
in-jk-are-fearing-for-their-lives/articleshow/95161623.cms
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/centre-not-in-favour-of-
moving-kashmiri-pandits-hindus-from-kashmir-valley-government-
official/article65487895.ece/amp/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=
17122500289922&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1705569
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/national-
conference-passes-resolution-for-return-and-rehabilitation-of-
kashmiri-pandits/article64843964.ece
https://www.jkmigrantrelief.nic.in/
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/centre-not-in-favour-of-
moving-kashmiri-pandits-hindus-from-kashmir-valley-government-
official/article65487895.ece/amp/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=
17122500289922&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com