Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12.Sustainabilityleadership
12.Sustainabilityleadership
Christoph Lueneburger
Egon Zehnder International, New York
christoph.lueneburger@ezi.net
+1.212.519.6020
Richard Murray-Bruce
Egon Zehnder International, London
richard.murray-bruce@ezi.net
+44 (0)207.943.1928
Sustainability Leadership Making Change Happen
Part I The Executive
After a period of corporate inertia and resistance in many sectors, more and more
businesses are recognizing the need to engage with the issue of sustainability. Calls
to action are coming from all sides, but how should companies respond? Corporate
approaches that relied either on minimum regulatory compliance or on public relations
initiatives are now seen to lack the broader strategic and commercial relevance required
for success. What does it take to lead an organization on this journey? What does it
take to define, promote and implement comprehensive, strategic, and commercially
relevant sustainability initiatives? And what experience and competencies should CEOs
look for when appointing senior executives to lead such initiatives?
From research conducted by our Global Sustainability Practice, it is clear that the
scope of the sustainability agenda itself is viewed differently not only by competitors in
the same industry, but also by different executives within the same organization (see
sidebar “Sustainability: A Working Definition”). Even senior sustainability leaders have
difficulty articulating what good looks like in this role. Because of these differences,
progress can be uneven, alignment elusive, and leading an organization on a
sustainability journey can be challenging.
F rontier
E fficient
T ime
Key Executive n
Change Leadership n
Results Delivery n
Strategic Orientation
Competencies n
Collaboration & Influencing n
Commercial Orientation n
Commercial Orientation
In our experience, companies that make the most rapid progress on this journey do
three things well:
■■ First, they determine the company’s state of organizational readiness for change – the
degree to which staff understand sustainability and are committed to achieving it.
■■ Second, they clearly define the mandate of the lead sustainability executive –
establishing their responsibilities and evolving these as key milestones are achieved
in the corporate sustainability program.
■■ Third, they ensure that the right executive is appointed to lead at each phase of the
program – selecting those who possess the right balance of competencies,
experience and personal characteristics to lead the organization through each phase.
Appointing the right sustainability executive for each phase of the program accelerates
an organization’s progress towards securing lasting competitive advantage from its
sustainability programs, but requires more than seeking professionals with subject-
matter expertise. Companies that fail to select the right executive can delay or de-rail
their efforts, running the risk that their sustainability programs are not aligned with
overall corporate strategy and lack commercial relevance.
C DE R
E
Y
L I V LT
HA S
A
NG H I P
RE
IP
LA
SH
ER M
A DT E A
RA I N
G N L
E
ER S
ER S
C DE R
E
Y
L I V LT
L I V LT
L I V LT
HA S
HA S
A
A
DE SU
DE SU
DE SU
NG H I P
NG H I P
RE
RE
E
C OL LU E
C OL LU E
INF
INF
INF
IP
IP
LA
LA
LA
SH
SH
ER M
ER M
5
BO NC
BO NC
BO NC
A DT E A
RA I N
RA I N
RA I N
O O O
TI
TI
TI
G N L G N L G N
E
COM COM C
M E RCIAL M E RCIAL
OR N OR N O
Sustainability Leadership: Making Change Happen
Although the lead sustainability executive will need a baseline of all these
competencies, each phase of the journey tests a different combination of dominant
competencies:
■■ In the intermediate phase, senior leadership is on board and the task is to translate
high-level commitments into a comprehensive change program with clearly defined
initiatives and hard commercial targets. To make this happen, the lead sustainability
executive must be good at delivering results and needs strong commercial
awareness. At the end of the intermediate phase, sustainability becomes an
organization imperative that is tracked through economic, environment and social
metrics over the business planning cycle.
By understanding how these key executive competencies play out in each of the three
phases, companies can make far better informed decisions about precisely what they
should look for in their lead sustainability executives.
ER S
C DE R
E
Y
L I V LT
HA S
A
DE SU
NG H I P
RE
Sustainability Leadership: Making Change Happen
E
Phase 1
C OL LU E
Making the Case for Change
INF
IP
LA
SH
ER M
BO NC
A DT E A
RA I N
O
TI
G N L
E
COM
M E RCIAL
OR I E
N TAT I O N
S T R AT E G I C Historically,STR nearly
A T E G I C every company has at some point been
S T R AT E G IC
E N TAT I O N E N TAT I O N I E N TAT I O N
OR I OR I
unconsciously reactive to sustainability: they notO Ronly were
L L L
unaware of the threats and opportunities resulting from
ER S
ER S
ER S
C DE R
C DE R
C DE R
E
E
Y
Y
L I V LT
L I V LT
L I V LT
HA S
HA S
HA S
A
A
sustainability, but they were unaware of this blind spot. But then
DE SU
DE SU
DE SU
NG H I P
NG H I P
NG H I P
RE
RE
RE
E
E
radar screen. The trigger can be an external event – competitor
activity, impending regulatory action, market, media or non
C OL LU E
C OL LU E
C OL LU E
governmental organization (NGO) scrutiny. More and more,
INF
INF
INF
IP
IP
IP
LA
LA
LA
SH
SH
SH
ER M
ER M
ER M
internal pressures, such as scarcity of a key manufacturing
BO NC
BO NC
BO NC
A DT E A
A DT E A
A DT E A
RA I N
RA I N
RA I N
O input,
G N force the issue. In our
O experience, one
G N of the most
O
TI
TI
TI
G N L L L
E
E
COM
M E RCIAL
frequent triggers
COM involves
M E RCIAL
a CEO, chairman or division
COM head
M E RCIAL
OR I E OR I E OR I E
N TAT I O N N TAT I O N N TAT I O N
realizing that the business is running a range of known and
unknown sustainability risks in its core operations and that
addressing those risks requires dedicated focus and resources.
■■ Change Leadership: the ability to understand and overcome the barriers to adopting
sustainability and to identify, define and develop a specific set of business processes
geared to manage previously un-quantified risks and to capture new opportunities.
strategy, highlighting the connections and not being afraid to call out, challenge and
bring innovative solutions to the table where there are major areas of difference. Some
organizations we looked at were willing to revise their overall corporate strategies early
in the process. Others preferred to see progress on discrete sustainability initiatives
before making more fundamental corporate strategic changes. All had some level
of strategic engagement in Phase 1 to ensure that initiatives launched in subsequent
phases were linked to the overall corporate strategy and delivered lasting and
commercially relevant change.
Recognizing and addressing major policy and regulatory issues that have the potential
to radically affect the organization’s economic sustainability are critical components
of the initial phase. While fundamental changes to corporate strategy and major new
initiatives take place in subsequent phases of corporate sustainability programs, early
identification of important, but as yet ill-defined risks and opportunities is important.
The challenge can be daunting. For example, one of our interviewees, the head of
sustainability for one of the world’s largest global banks, recalls a meeting in which
another executive stopped talking in mid-sentence, pointed at him and said, “I can’t say
anything more as long as he is in the room.”
The head of sustainability at a leading European retailer reports that this phase can
feel like “kicking at the door” in order to make senior managers understand the
challenges that sustainability poses to the business and recognize the need to engage
in a meaningful discussion. “You are a bit like the grit in the wheel – making things
uncomfortable for the senior team and helping to shake up their thinking,” he says.
“You have to walk a fine line between challenging senior leaders and pushing things
too far and getting rejected by the organization.”
However, even the most persuasive argument for sustainability is unlikely to have
lasting impact if the lead sustainability executive is unable to collaborate with and
influence others. He or she must be able to influence different parts of the business, as
well as external partners and stakeholders, to commit to the effort. They must be able
to listen, build alliances across the business, and align leadership. Further, the role
of the lead sustainability executive is often poorly understood in other parts of the
organization. Under those circumstances, the executive has to make up in collaborative
skills for what may be a perceived lack of clout. And he or she must do so from the
beginning. Says a US manufacturing head of sustainability, “You need to tell a story
that engages the general managers – not eventually, but the first time around.”
Executives who rate well on collaboration and influencing are, in our experience,
somewhat rarer than those who score highly on change leadership. The right leader
for this phase is driven by the need to change – supporting change, advocating it and
motivating others to initiate change. He or she knows how to get the support of others
and how to build enduring partnerships across organizations and geographies. Both
competencies are critical.
Although the first phase may already contain localized sustainability efforts, they will
typically be unconnected by an overarching strategy. By the end of the first phase,
however, the sustainability leader who can lead change and collaborate effectively will
have brought organizational capability from the state of unconscious reactivity to that
of conscious reactivity: the organization still lacks a comprehensive sustainability
program, but it knows this – and recognizes the need to develop one.
ER S
C DE R
E
Y
L I V LT
HA S
A
DE SU
NG H I P
RE
Sustainability Leadership: Making Change Happen
E
Phase 2
C OL LU E
IP
LA
SH
ER M
BO NC
A DT E A
RA I N
O
TI
G N L
E
COM
M E RCIAL
OR I E
N TAT I O N
EG IC S T R AT E G I C In the intermediate
S T R A T E G I C phase of organizational capability for
AT I O N E N TAT I O N E N TAT I O N
OR I OR I
sustainability, the mandate for change has been agreed upon by
L L L
the senior leadership team and communicated throughout the
ER S
ER S
C DE R
C DE R
C DE R
E
E
Y
Y
L I V LT
L I V LT
HA S
HA S
HA S
A
A
organization. People now view sustainability as an inevitable
DE SU
DE SU
NG H I P
NG H I P
NG H I P
RE
RE
E
E
thrust of the business. In terms of capability, the organization
is beginning to develop and implement programs that translate
vision into a series of discrete initiatives and tangible projects
C OL LU E
C OL LU E
INF
IP
IP
IP
LA
LA
SH
SH
SH
ER M
ER M
ER M
BO NC
BO NC
A DT E A
A DT E A
A DT E A
RA I N
RA I N
O Where
G N little data and no metrics
O existed before, there is now
TI
TI
L G N L L
E
E
RCIAL
COM
M E RCIAL
a concerted C Oeffort
M M E RCIAL to follow the management adage that “what
OR I E OR I E
AT I O N N TAT I O N N TAT I O N
gets measured gets done,” which includes hard financial,
environmental and social data. Sustainability initiatives
are regularly reassessed and, where appropriate, adjusted,
expanded, or curtailed. As organizational readiness and organizational capability rise
in tandem, the sustainability leader begins to hand off operational responsibility to
other areas of the business. Heads of business units, for example, adopt sustainability
metrics as an explicit part of their performance dashboards and make sustainability
part of their quarterly and annual focus.
At this phase of organizational readiness, the most important competencies for the
lead sustainability executive are:
■■ Commercial Orientation: the ability to focus and prioritize efforts that generate
the most value for the organization over the business planning cycle, and the
willingness to abandon initiatives that prove not to address sustainability issues.
To ensure that the corporate sustainability action plan addresses all of the major
issues facing the business, the executive should be able to fully appreciate how issues
as disparate as carbon pricing, resource limitations, and the social components
of sustainability affect the company. At all times, however, the lead sustainability
executive must be able to narrate the commercial relevance of these issues with a firm
focus on risk mitigation and value creation. To do so, he or she must be able to engage
and lead teams – both those who are dedicated and those who are disparate and often
virtual – to tackle complex issues.
We have found that executives who rate highly on results and commercial orientation
are consistently connecting market need to competitive advantage. They set aggressive
goals that have real economic impact, and track their progress against plan as they
strive to reach them. These executives are motivated by metrics, and they will drive
hard to deliver.
By the end of this phase, the organization will be conscious of sustainability and no
longer merely reactive to its implications; it will proactively leverage sustainability to
manage risks and create value.
For example, the role of Chief Information Officer (CIO) has evolved over the past 20 years from one defined by
technical mastery to a business leadership position. Successful CIOs who have taken this journey have combined
their technical skill with commercial acumen and strategic awareness to move from being functional specialists
to business partners. Based on our evaluation of 145 CIOs from 28 companies in 9 industry groups (benchmarked
to a control group of 146 CEOs and 110 COOs), the biggest differences between “good” and “outstanding” CIOs lies
in the superior strength of their change leadership and results delivery. In fact, a high level of technology expertise
was not a significant causal dimension of the profile of “outstanding” CIOs.
L
C DE R
E
HA S
A
NG H I P
Phase 3
Expanding Boundaries
IP
SH
ER M
A DT E A
L
E
CIAL
TION
C DE R
E
E
Y
L I V LT
HA S
HA S
A
NG H I P
RE
E
IP
LA
SH
SH
ER M
ER M
While much focus will fall on internal issues that can have
BO NC
A DT E A
A DT E A
RA I N
L G N L
E
CIAL
COM
M E RCIAL
be able to identify longer-term issues and opportunities that
OR I E
TION N TAT I O N
require a more sophisticated level of engagement with external
stakeholders – issues and opportunities that may have a more
fundamental impact on business strategy and operations. The
lead sustainability executive needs to bring strategic orientation and maintain and
extend the commercial orientation of the previous phase:
■■ Commercial Orientation: the ability to focus and prioritize efforts that generate
the most value for the organization over the medium to very long-term, and the
willingness to abandon initiatives that prove not to address sustainability issues.
Sustainability leaders in this phase are inquisitive and reflective, asking tough
questions that probe the core purpose of the organization. What are the ways in which
we can run our business without fear of environmental degradation or social inequity?
How can we anticipate, influence and benefit from regulatory changes that relate
to sustainability? How can we leverage those ways to create differentiation and
competitive advantage in our markets? The task for this executive is one of continually
enhancing organizational capability in sustainability. To do so, he or she will need
exceptional strategic orientation – in addition to resolute competence in commercial
orientation much like that in Phase 2. It is this combination that allows sustainability
leaders in Phase 3 to synthesize multiple and frequently conflicting trends in
developing a coherent long-term sustainability strategy, managing trade-offs, and
ensuring that the overall corporate strategy is aligned with key sustainability principles.
Thus the leader evolves into a futurist, pursuing long-term investments and
partnerships that strengthen and transform organizational assets ranging from
internal capabilities and target segments to supply chains and distribution channels.
He or she must be cognizant of new opportunities arising in the course of tackling
sustainability issues. For example, one client company we interviewed was struggling
to limit the impact of its waste in a traditionally asset-light industry. When their lead
sustainability executive reviewed the challenge through a strategic lens, the issue
appeared in a fundamentally new way. The lead sustainability executive helped
develop a new co-generation plant that used the waste as a fuel, thereby saving energy
costs and reducing carbon emissions. Another European retail client forged new links
with a charity where consumers could recycle their clothes in return for vouchers to
buy new clothes in stores. As is typical of Phase 3, the leaders of these efforts thought
intensely about overcoming challenges for business, but no less intensely about
creating businesses for challenges.
Such successes are a reminder that strategic orientation encompasses far more than an
abstract intellectual ability. It also means having the creativity to develop new approaches
to sustainability challenges and the courage to question the status quo. For example,
the lead sustainability executive might challenge the way the business typically looks
at investments, demonstrating how hurdle rates might be adjusted to take account of
initiatives that would generate a significant return, but over a longer time period.
As new directions become visible on the business planning horizon, the lead sustainability
executive must also be able to ensure that the appropriate changes are implemented at the
operational level. At the same time, the goal is to disseminate responsibility for generating
sustainability improvement from the corporate level to the business level by embedding
best practices throughout the organization. As the sustainability leader for one of the
world’s leading computer manufacturers succinctly puts it: “My job is to disassemble
my team and spread it across a bunch of P&Ls.” Once initiatives are under way, the
sustainability leader can become a key node for information exchange, facilitating
connections across international business units and functional areas, as well as forging
opportune – and sometimes non-obvious – external relationships.
Executives capable of developing long-term plans that shape corporate strategy can
move the organization to being unconsciously proactive with respect to sustainability.
Sustainability is symbiotically embedded in the operational processes and the long-
term strategy of the business.
An often repeated proverb holds that “it’s the journey that counts, not the destination.”
Not with sustainability. What counts here is very much the destination - the point at
which the organization can routinely and reliably extract the maximum value from its
sustainability efforts. But to get there, Boards of Directors and CEOs must first know
where they are on this journey. They can do so by asking some fundamental questions:
■■ If we are ready to pursue sustainability, what goals and metrics should we adopt?
The answers will provide a compass for the journey ahead and help to select the right
executive to make change happen.
Sustainability Teamwork
The Other Half of the Story Sustainability Leadership Making Change Happen
Part II The Team
Lead sustainability executives cannot go it alone. They need a strong team with the right
competencies for success around them. As with the lead sustainability executive, the
relative importance of these team competencies shifts as an organization moves through
the three phases of engaging with the sustainability agenda. How these competencies
change and the implications for organizations seeking to assemble the right sustainability
talent is the subject of Part II of this series.