Assessment rubric for course code : CSC126

CLO 3: Demonstrate communication skills in tasks related to computer program solutions (PLO5, A3)

TYPE OF ASSESSMENT: Group Project

FULLMARK AS STATED IN JSUB: 35%

TITLE OF THE PROJECT

MEMBER 1 MEMBER 2 MEMBER 3 MEMBER 4

NAME:
STUDENT NO.:
GROUP:

Instruction to lecturers ➔ Simply put X in the provided yellow boxes

REPORT SCORING RUBRICS

No Submission Poor Fair Good Excellent

Attribute Sub-attribute Weight Marks
0 1 2 3 4
Excellent use of
No Submission Poor use of variables. Fair use of variables. Good use of variables.
Variables variables. 2 #N/A

The code is readable

The code is exceptionally
only by someone who The code is fairly easy to
The code is poorly well organized, well-
knows what it is read. Minimum
organized and very commented and very
supposed to be doing. comments are included.
No Submission difficult to read. easy to follow.
Readability 2 #N/A
White space makes Good use of white
Poor use of white space. Excellent use of white
program fairly easy to space.
space.
read.
 A logical solution, easy to
A difficult and inefficient Solution is efficient and Solution is efficient, easy
follow but not the most
solution. easy to follow (i.e. no to understand and
efficient.
confusing tricks). maintain.
Does not include
No Submission Partially include selection
Efficiency selection control Include selection control Include selection control 3 #N/A
control structure,
structure, repetition structure, repetition structure, repetition
repetition control
control structure, control structure, control structure,
structure, function and
function and array. function and array. function and array.
array.

User prompts are Excellent user prompts,

User prompts contain
Does not execute due to understandable, good use of symbols or
No Submission little information, poor
Input/Output errors. minimum use of symbols spacing in output (neatly 3 #N/A
design.
or spacing in output. displayed).

A very good
Poor introduction. Fairly good introduction. Good introduction. introduction.
No Submission
Introduction The problem-to-solve is The problem-to-solve is The problem-to-solve is The problem-to-solve is 2 #N/A
not well introduced. introduced. well introduced. well introduced with
supporting references.

Poor explanation of
Fairly good explanation Good explanation of Excellent explanation of
algorithm which does not
No Submission of algorithm based on algorithm based on algorithm based on
Documentation/ Algorithm reflex the program 3 #N/A
program developed. program developed. program developed.
Project Report developed.

Good and logical Well thought-out and

Unrelated discussion and Fairly good discussion
Discussion & No Submission discussion and logical discussion and
conclusion and conclusion 2 #N/A
Conclusion conclusion conclusion.

The report is delivered

Late submission (more Late submission (less than The report is delivered on
No Submission within a week of the
Delivery than 2 weeks overdue). 2 weeks overdue). time. 1 #N/A
due date.
 PRESENTATION SCORING RUBRICS - INDIVIDUAL

No Submission Poor Fair Good Excellent

Attribute Sub-attribute Weight Marks
0 1 2 3 4
Student did not speak in
Voice is acceptable - Student's voice was loud
a tone that could be
many gaps in flow of Voice is good with and clear.
No heard - too soft.
Voice/ information or times minimal gaps in flow of
Presentation 2 #N/A
Presentation voice could not be information. Information was easy to
Information too hard too
understood by all. understand.
understand.

Student occasionally Student's graphics

No Student uses superfluous uses graphics that rarely Student's graphics relate explain and reinforce
Overall Visual
Presentation graphics or no graphics. support text and to text and presentation. screen text and 2 #N/A
Appeal
presentation. presentation.

Presentation has no
Presentation has four or Presentation has three
Presentation more than two Presentation has no
more misspellings and/or misspellings and/or
misspellings and/or misspelling or gramatical
gramatical errors. gramatical errors.
No grammatical errors. erors.
Mechanics &
Presentation 1 #N/A
Length Presentation was 5 Presentation was 3 - 4
Presentation was 1 - 2 Presentation was within
minutes over specified minutes over or under
minutes over or under specified length.
length. the specified length.
the specified length.

Student presents
Audience cannot Audience has difficulty Student presents
information in logical,
No understand presentation following presentation information in logical
interesting sequence
Organization Presentation because there is no because student jumps sequence which 2 #N/A
which audience can
sequence of information. around. audience can follow.
follow.

TOTAL MARKS 100 #N/A