Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lehal Leadership Reflection Self-Evaluation 570
Lehal Leadership Reflection Self-Evaluation 570
Lehal Leadership Reflection Self-Evaluation 570
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION/SELF-EVALUATION
Leadership Reflection/Self-Evaluation
Navjeet Lehal
Leadership Reflection/Self-Evaluation
The IPE session that I am referring to is the Error Disclosure case scenario. In this
scenario there was a client who came to the ER after having complications due to an STI. She
did not know that she had it at the time, and the diagnosis got delayed because of negligence of
healthcare providers. She ended up having critical symptoms due to this misdiagnosis. The
awkward interprofessional communication that occurred during this IPE was figuring out how to
tell the client or a family member of the client how everything happened. We were not sure what
we could say after making such a big mistake, it affects the life of the client and everyone around
them. A big principle of leadership that applies in this situation is effective communication. The
error occurred because the healthcare team did not communicate properly before and once the
mistake had been made. They did not realize they incorrectly inputted the client’s number in
wrong. If the clinic supervisor had tried to reach the client by other means, since she didn’t
answer her cell, the situation could have been avoided altogether. This is also a place for better
directed collaboration. In this case, the clinic supervisor could have contacted another member of
the team and asked what they should do in this case. Instead they documented it and moved on.
If there was another person they could have gone to and taken guidance from, the situation
would be different. Sometimes the healthcare offices will have liaisons for these kinds of
reasons. Observation/analysis could also have been improved because if we noticed how the
client’s father was getting worked up, we could have started deescalating sooner. There was also
a fault in planning on the healthcare staffs side. They could have a plan in place if they are not
able to contact a client, but need to tell them of a diagnosis that they have. Having a plan in place
3
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION/SELF-EVALUATION
to contact them or getting an emergency contact would have proved to be beneficial for the client
I think the theoretical perspective that resonates with me the most for guiding
the path-goal theory of leadership. There are four main types of leadership that go along with the
path-goal theory. The types include directive, supportive, participative, and achievement oriented
(Dunbar-Smalley & Winston, 2022). The directive approach consists of telling the professional
exactly what to do by giving them clear guidelines of what to do. The supportive approach
consists of being friendly and supportive and could mean thinking of each other as equals. The
participative approach consists of the professional being a part of big decisions in the work
environment. The achievement approach consists of setting high goals and providing challenges
for the professional. This theory of leadership is very beneficial for collaborative processes
relationships between the professional and the organization. Having a positive relationship with
the organization increases motivation, effort, and a better work environment. This theory of
leadership also promotes satisfaction, abilities of professionals, provides guidance, and provides
resources. I believe satisfaction is a very important part of making a better working environment
for someone. To love what you do; you need to be satisfied with what you do.
The theoretical perspective that I would use for guiding effective client and population-
centered care in that IPE session is servant leadership. According to Dunbar-Smalley & Winston
(2022) the six key disciplines of servant leadership consist of placing value on people,
providing leadership, and finally by sharing leadership. In this situation, the mistake was all the
4
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION/SELF-EVALUATION
professional’s fault. The client did everything they were meant to do, so I don’t think the other
theories apply. I think that we would need to nurture and empower them by telling them about
our mistake and making sure they get the proper care that they need. This would also be a good
lesson for self-advocacy, the client probably felt that something was wrong but didn’t act because
the professionals never got back to her. I would need to put the needs and interests of this clients
above my own.
I think I could have taken more of a leadership role in the Error Disclosure IPE than what
I ended up doing. I chose to be the person that started the talk with the client, in this case the
client’s father. I basically stated that we made a mistake and that we were sorry. I didn’t go into
detail very much. I got a little flustered and didn’t state everything that I wanted to state. The
client’s father seemed to get riled up and at this point, I didn’t know what to tell him. I stayed
quiet and let the others talk for me. I regret not speaking up as much as I should have. If I were to
take a leadership role in this IPE the next time, I would speak up. Even if I didn’t know exactly
what to say, I could still empathize with him. Having a support person and having someone to
validate his feelings would most likely make him feel better. I would want him to know it wasn’t
his fault or his daughter’s fault, it was all on us. I would put their needs and interests above my
References