Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UAS Metodologi Pemikiran Islam
UAS Metodologi Pemikiran Islam
22410179@students.uii.ac.id
Abstract
1
Student of Faculty of Law UII
1
A. Problem Statement
In this book, the debate around religious pluralism and tolerance in the Islamic
context is one of the main issues discussed in depth. Several thinkers highlight the
importance of understanding diversity of beliefs and accepting religious differences as an
integral part of an inclusive society. They emphasize that Islam, as a religion that carries a
message of peace and justice, must be able to adapt to this diversity. However, there are
also critical views of the concept of religious pluralism, which highlight the analytical
shortcomings and difficulties in distinguishing between individual beliefs and the teachings
of Islam as a universal religion.2 These critical views reflect the complexity of addressing
diversity of beliefs in contemporary Muslim societies, where the line between tolerance
and maintaining the purity of religious teachings is often blurred.
The issue of human rights was also a major focus of the discussion. Some thinkers
emphasized the need for reforms in Islamic law to ensure that human rights standards are
respected and properly implemented. This involved in-depth discussions on topics such as
gender equality, religious freedom, and other civil rights. The main challenge at hand is
how to integrate universal human rights values into the existing Islamic legal framework
without compromising fundamental religious principles. These thinkers argue that
inclusive and dialogical reforms can help bridge the gap between universal values and
traditional Islamic teachings.
In addition, the book also highlights the role of women in Muslim societies. The
discussion on gender equality and women's rights in Islam illustrates the complexity of the
relationship between religious teachings and social reality. Some thinkers emphasize the
importance of reinterpreting Islamic sacred texts to ensure the recognition and
implementation of gender equality and the protection of women's rights. They argue that
efforts to address gender disparities and champion women's rights must be undertaken
within the framework of Islamic values, taking into account the existing social and cultural
context. This reflects an ongoing effort to harmonize religious traditions with the demands
of social justice.
Overall, the book addresses the complex dynamics of contemporary thought in the
Islamic world. The challenge of integrating universal values such as pluralism, human
2
Carool Kersten, “Dealing With Difference And Plurality: Emancipation, Toleration, And Human Rights”,
(New York: Routledge, 2019)
2
rights and gender equality into traditional Islamic frameworks requires an inclusive and
dialogical approach. The book provides an in-depth insight into the various perspectives
that exist in dealing with changes and challenges in the contemporary Islamic world, as
well as highlighting the importance of dialogue and reform in creating a more just and
harmonious society.
Previous research conducted on the topics in the book "Contemporary Thought in the
Muslim World" by Carool Kersten includes various studies that enrich the discussion on
pluralism, human rights and gender equality in the Islamic context.
b. Human Rights
Research on human rights in Islam has been widely discussed by scholars such as
Abdolkarim Soroush and Khaled Abou El Fadl. Soroush argued that Islamic law should
not only focus on legal aspects, but also on descriptive and epistemological aspects.
This makes it possible to combine modern concepts of human rights with traditional
Islamic principles.
Khaled Abou El Fadl assessed the suitability of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR) with Islamic views. He emphasized that the sanctity of human life,
which is the main principle in the goals of sharia (maqasid al-shari'a), is in accordance
with the basic moral commitment of human rights. Abou El Fadl argues that while there
is a specific view of human rights in Islam, it must be understood in a broader
philosophical and religious context.
3
c. Gender Equality
Discussions on gender equality and women's rights in Islam were strengthened by the
contributions of Muslim feminists such as Amina Wadud, Fatima Mernissi, and Ziba
Mir-Hosseini. These scholars proposed a reinterpretation of Islamic texts to address and
remedy gender inequality. Wadud focuses on the Qur'an and encourages an analytical
approach to text to challenge patriarchal interpretations. Mernissi critically examines
the hadith to expose and counter traditions that are detrimental to women. Mir-Hosseini
spoke about Islamic law and the importance of a more progressive interpretation of
sharia to ensure women's rights are respected.
Islamic feminism has flourished since the early 20th century with figures such as Qasim
Amin and Huda Sha'arawi championing women's education and rights from a
nationalist and religious perspective. This initial effort became the basis for
contemporary feminist studies that continue to challenge and reinterpret traditional
Islamic teachings in favor of gender equality in Muslim society.
Overall, previous research on these topics has shown a dynamic interaction between
tradition and modernity. This highlights the potential for a progressive interpretation of
Islamic thought in favor of pluralism, human rights, and gender equality. This academic
effort is important to address the complexities and challenges faced by Muslim society
today.
In the book "Contemporary Thought In The Muslim World: Trends, Themes, And
Issues" by Carool Kersten, there are three main approaches used to analyze contemporary
Islamic thought, especially in the context of social, political, and intellectual change. Here
are three approaches explained more simply:
4
1. Deontology-Revelatorial Approach
This approach focuses on moral obligations derived from sacred texts and sharia law.
That is, all moral rules are taken directly from God's revelation. Scholars who support
this approach believe that human moral obligation derives from theological doctrines
such as 'barā'a asliyya' (fundamental rejection). However, this approach has its
drawbacks because it does not recognize moral obligations that are not stated in the text
of revelation. This makes moral dialogue difficult because all commands are thought to
come from revealed texts, which do not always provide specific guidance for the rights
and obligations of Muslims outside of Islamic government.
2. Contractualist-Constructivist Approach
This approach emphasizes the importance of contracts and social agreements in
determining moral obligations. The value of shared security is often used in classical
Islamic law to respect the interests of non-Muslims living in non-Muslim lands.
However, this approach is also limited because it only focuses on fulfilling the contract
literally. That is, moral obligations and care for others are based only on the agreed
contract.
3. Consequentialist-Utilitarian Approach
This approach is more pragmatic and tries to work together socially in a broader way.
This approach centers on how accepting certain social and political facts can benefit
Muslims. For example, the concept of 'fiqh al-muwazanat' (the law of balance)
developed by Yusuf al-Qaradawi tries to manage relations with non-Muslims not only
on a contractual basis but also through the teaching of Islam (daʿwa). This approach
tries to expand relations with non-Muslims outside the contract, but remains limited in
terms of full recognition of the rights of religious minorities in the Muslim world.
Overall, the book uses a variety of approaches to understanding moral obligations and
social relations in the context of today's Muslim world. This book provides an in-depth
analysis of how various theological and jurisprudential approaches attempt to address the
challenges of religious pluralism and social interaction in an ever-changing society. This
approach helps us understand the complexity and diversity in contemporary Islamic
thought.
5
D. The Result Of The Research
a. Human Rights in an Islamic Perspective
Khaled Abou El Fadl examines human rights from an Islamic point of view, comparing
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) with the Cairo Declaration on
Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI). He emphasized that the UDHR is a positive law that
applies through agreement between countries, while the rights in it have strong moral
values, similar to natural law. According to him, human rights have a greater normative
value than just a political process, and because this concept respects human life, there
is harmony with the goals of Islamic law (maqasid al-shari'a).
This highlights that the principles of universal human rights do not contradict the
teachings of Islam. Some scholars argue that values such as justice, freedom, and
equality are integral to Islamic teachings and should be applied in a modern context to
ensure that individual rights are respected and protected.
In Islamic studies, Abou El Fadl found that human rights (huquq al-ʿibad) are often
considered more important than the rights of God (huquq Allah). This is in contrast to
the view that puts revelation first in Islamic law. In the 12th century, Islamic
philosophers and jurists debated whether basic human rights came from man's ability
to distinguish right from wrong, or whether they all came from divine command. This
debate also appears in other philosophical and religious traditions.
This shows that in Islam, the fulfillment of human rights is often prioritized, reflecting
that the principles of justice and social welfare can be found in Islamic teachings. This
supports the argument that human rights can be integrated with Islamic law.
6
This highlights the growing support among Muslim intellectuals for a democratic
system and inclusive political participation. They argue that democratic principles can
be found in the shura (consultation) tradition advocated in Islam and encourage the
active participation of Muslims in the political process.
Nur Khalik Ridwan criticized the way pluralism is often used in Islam, which he calls
"bourgeois pluralism". Ridwan argues that pluralism is often used by the bourgeois elite
to maintain the status quo, not as a sincere effort to achieve social justice and equality.
He emphasized the need for a new approach in Indonesia's Islamic society that is more
pro-people and focuses on social justice.
This research also shows how contemporary thinking in the Islamic world seeks to
answer the challenges of modernity, democracy, human rights, and pluralism.
Contemporary Islamic thinkers seek to combine traditional Islamic values with modern
principles, with the goal of creating a more just and inclusive society.
7
show the diversity and development of modern Islamic scholarship, showing how
traditional Islamic values can be adapted to modern principles to create a more just and
inclusive society.
3
Mashood A. Baderin, International Human Rights and Islamic Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2003), 302.
4
Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, Islam and the Secular State Negotiating the Future of Shari'a." (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 2008)
5
Mohammad Hashim Kamali, “Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence”, (Malaysia: Islamic Texts Society, 2003)
6
Khaled Abou El Fadl, “Islam and the Challenge of Democracy”, (Boston: Princeton University Press, 2004)
8
3. Reformation of Islamic Thought on Democracy and Human Rights
John L. Esposito and John O. Voll in their book "Islam and Democracy" discuss various
reform efforts in the Muslim world to integrate democratic principles with Islamic
values. They emphasized the importance of separation of powers and the protection of
individual rights as key components in Islamic democracy.7 This view is in line with
the views of al-Jabri and An-Na'im who show that the principles of democracy can be
found in the Islamic tradition and that modernity does not have to be contrary to Islamic
values.
Robert W. Hefner in his book "Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia"
explores the democratization process in Indonesia, highlighting how inclusive Islamic
thought has supported broader political participation and democracy. Hefner points out
that the shura tradition in Islam can support democratic principles.8 This reinforces the
view that democracy and inclusive political participation can be in line with Islamic
values, such as those endorsed by al-Jabri and An-Na'im.
4. Pluralism and Interreligious Solidarity
Osman Bakar in his book "The Qur'an on Interfaith and Inter-Civilizational Dialogue:
Interpreting a Divine Message for Twenty-First Century Humanity" examines how the
Qur'an supports interfaith dialogue and cooperation to achieve social justice. Bakar
pointed out that the principles of pluralism in the Qur'an encourage cooperation and
respect for religious differences.9
Farid Esack in his book "The Qur'an: A User's Guide" highlights that the Qur'an
encourages dialogue and solidarity between religions as a way to confront social
injustice. He also emphasized that pluralism and respect for differences are at the core
of Islamic teachings.10 It reinforces the view that efforts to build solidarity should be
based on respect for religious differences, as advocated by Esack.
5. Criticism of the Reason of Pluralism
Abdullah Saeed in his book "Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a Contemporary
Approach" offers a contemporary approach in interpreting the Qur'an, criticizing
7
John. L Esposito, John. O Voll, “ Islam And Democracy, (New York : Oxford University Press, 1996)
8
Robert. W Hefner, “ Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia”, (Princenton: Princenton
University Press, 2000)
9
Osman Bakar, “The Qur'an on Interfaith and Inter-civilization Dialogue: Interpreting a Divine Message for
Twenty-first Century Humanity”, (Malaysia: International Institute of Islamic Thought Malaysia and Institute for
Study of the Ummah and Global Understanding, 2006)
10
Farid Esack, “The Qur’an: A User’s Guide”, (England: Oneworld Publications, 2005)
9
traditional and conservative ways of understanding pluralism. Saeed emphasized the
need for a more inclusive approach and relevant to the modern social context.11 It
supports Ridwan's criticism of "Bourgeois Pluralism" and highlights the need for a
more pro-people approach and a focus on social justice in Islamic society.
Fazlur Rahman in his book "Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual
Tradition" explores how Islamic intellectual traditions can be adapted to respond to the
challenges of modernity, including in terms of pluralism and social reform. Rahman
emphasized the importance of critical and contextual thinking in interpreting Islamic
teachings.12 It supports the view that Islamic law must be updated to reflect social and
cultural changes, supporting Ridwan's criticism of pluralism that is only used to
maintain the status quo.
The book "Contemporary Thought in the Muslim World: Trends, Themes, and Issues"
by Carool Kersten makes a significant contribution to the understanding of human rights
and pluralism in the context of Islam. The exploration of these themes is essential to address
contemporary issues faced by Muslim societies, especially regarding women's legal and
social positions, gender equality, and acceptance of religious diversity.
The book discusses the position of Muslim law in minority situations and broader issues
related to freedom of religion, belief, and expression, all of which are important for
human rights. Khaled Abou El Fadl's criticism of conservative views on women
highlights the tension between traditional jurisprudence and modern human rights
standards. This chapter emphasizes the debate about whether the liberation of
11
Abdullah Saeed, “Interpreting the Qur'an Towards a Contemporary Approach”, (London: Routledge, 2005)
12
Fazlur Rahman, "Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition.", (London: Chicago
Press, 1982)
10
marginalized groups should be guided by universal human rights standards or by the
various Islamic Declarations of Human Rights issued since 1981.
Muslim feminists such as Amina Wadud, Fatima Mernissi, and Ziba Mir-Hosseini have
contributed substantially to the discourse on women's rights in Islam. Their work
challenges the traditional interpretations of Islamic texts that have been used to justify
gender inequality. Wadud's "tawhidic" paradigm and Mernissi's critique of the
misogynistic narrator of hadith are examples of how these scholars used Islamic sources
to fight for gender equality.
Carool Kersten's book "Contemporary Thought in the Muslim World: Trends, Themes,
and Issues" provides a comprehensive overview of the schools of thought that shape
the Islamic world today. However, there are several things that can be criticized,
including:
a. While Kersten provides a broad overview of various themes and issues, some parts feel
in-depth. For example, the discussion of pluralism and human rights is quite long but
sometimes lacks the details and complexities that exist in this debate.
11
b. This book seeks to cover a wide range of perspectives, but it may not yet fully represent
the diversity in the Muslim world. Some important voices, especially from non-Arab
territories, may be less visible. This can make the picture of contemporary Islamic
thought a bit biased.
c. Kersten manages to connect contemporary debates with his historical context.
However, sometimes historical narratives are more dominant than current analysis, so
it may be difficult for readers to see a direct connection between past and present
developments.
d. The book's approach to combining various disciplines is good, but sometimes it makes
the narrative feel disjointed. The integration of these various scientific insights,
although enriching, sometimes interferes with the flow and clarity of arguments.
e. Although Kersten strives to make complex ideas easier to understand, the book still
feels heavy and difficult to follow for readers who do not have a background in Islamic
studies. Simplifying some of the theoretical discussions could make this book more
appealing to more people.
12
References
An-Na'im, A. A. (2008). Islam And The Secular State Negotiating The Future Of Shari'a. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Baderin, M. A. (2003). International Human Rights And Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakar, O. (2006). The Qur'an On Interfaith And Inter-Civilization Dialogue: Interpreting A Divine
Message For Twenty-First Century Humanity . Malaysia : IITM And Institute For Study Of The
Ummah And Global Understanding.
Fadl, K. A. (2004). Islam And The Challenge Of Democracy. Boston: Princenton University Press.
John. L Esposito, J. O. (1996). Islam And Democracy . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kersten, C. (2019). Dealing With Difference And Plurality: Emancipation, Toleration, And Human
Rights. New York: Routledge.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam And Modernity: Tranformation Of An Intellectual Tradition. London: Chicago
Press.
Saeed, A. (2005). Interpreting The Qur,an Towards A Contemporary Approach . London: 2005.
13