Final Report on Gcf 2023

BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES, WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS, AND
ASSOCIATED CATCHMENTS IN UGANDA
Final Reporting Activity Template
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity
Title Physical restoration of the targeted degraded
(as is in the agreement) area of Kopege and Angod wetland system in
Odwarat Sub County
Focal Point of the AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICER
Responsible Party
Executing Institution NGORA DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Reporting Date 27th November,2023
Implementation Period: Start date 20th July, 2023

(include the start date of the End date 24th November ,2023
quarter and end date of the
quarter)
Total Activity Budget UGX; 37,800,000/= (THIRTY SEVEN MILLION
EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND SHILLINGS ONLY).
Project Site(s)/location . WETLAND SECTIONS FROM KOPEGE- ODWARAT
covered VILLAGE- AND ANGOD VILLAGE ALONG THE AGU
WETLAND SYSTEM
Number of Participants Age Group Sub

/ Beneficiaries Below 30 Above 30 Total
Sex Male 333
Female 101
Sub Total 434
2. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
Provide a narrative report describing the overall progress on the
implementation of the funded activity, focusing on
1|Page
A. Implementation achievements.
i) Wetland demarcation pillars planted along 1,963 kilometres of the

wetland boundary from Kopege-Odwarat village and Angod village
in Odwarat Sub County.
ii) 19,630 Ha in terms of km 1,963 of the degraded wetland were demarcated, restored
through blockage of drainage channels and removal of constructed bunds.
Note ;The targeted area of degraded wetland for restoration was 700Ha
iii) 199 affected farmers were profiled and their names to be submitted to MAAIF for
provision of alternative livelihoods under component 2 of the project.
iv) Enterprises engaged by the affected community members were identified as rice
cultivation, potatoes Millet ,Ground nuts ,grazing of cattle, fishing, papyrus
harvesting in areas of kopege growing of maize, tomatoes among others.
v) The technical team was able to meet the wetland users and compiled valuable
information concerning the targeted wetland.
vi) The targeted wetland users were provided information that guided all the
presentations during stake awareness meeting.
B) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include a
description of key milestones of the funded activity achieved during this reporting
period including any deviations from original expectations. Also describe challenges
encountered and actions undertaken to resolve these challenges)
i) The wetland area to be restored had immature crops planted and

destruction of these crops would have caused riots in the community.
ii) Funds were inadequate thus the target of restoring 700 Ha could not be
achieved.
iii) The wetland terrain was very difficult for transportation of the pillars and
this made the exercise very expensive.
iv) There was a fear among the local leaders that affected farmers would not
be provided with alternative livelihoods this negatively affected their
moral during the exercise.
(i) Funds were inadequate to procure personal protective gears such as gumboots
for all the participants especially the leaders, this made the movement of the
team difficult during the exercise.
(ii) Risks encountered, there were high chances of bush or wild snakes during the
rapid assessment and demarcation exercise.
(iii) Risks of community members and few local leaders with threatening
languages that interferes with the exercise in areas of wetland they fell belongs
to them the community members.
ix) Risk of high sunshine throughout the exercise causing headeque to the
technical team.
Actions undertaken to resolve the challenges;
i) The farmers were allowed to harvest their planted crops but not to replant
within the demarcated area after this season.
ii) Only 1,963 Kilometres of the wetland area were restored instead of the
targeted 700 Ha.
iii) The team managed to work through the difficult terrain.
2|Page
iv) Farmers were assured by the RDC that those affected would be given
alternative livelihoods by MAAIF under component 2 of the project. And
should live activities that degrades wetland.
v) RDC assured farmers that the restoration activities was good because it is a
presidential directive.
A) Lessons learned during implementation.(Include positive achievements and

better-than-expected results. If any risks have arisen during the implementation
period, please provide a description of those risks and how they have impacted their
implementation and final targets. Please provide information on key results and
deliverables within wider country context and connect the rationale of the activities
with the why and how results were achieved).
i) There is need to provide the affected farmers with alternative livelihood

immediately after the demarcation and restoration exercise is conducted to prevent
re-encroachment of the restored areas.
ii) Follow up monitoring and enforcement should be continuous to sustain the actions
taken.
iii) The wetland restoration activities should always be aligned after harvest season to
avoid destruction of the crops during restoration which attracts sympathy and
rioting.
iv) Profiling of the affected farmers should be conducted on the day of demarcation
and restoration this help get the actual affected persons on ground.
3. PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE FOLLOWING THE GCF INVESTMENT

CRITERIA
Provide a narrative report describing the progress on the funded activity’s performance
against the following.
3.1 Impact Potential (potential to achieve impact)
i) Demarcation of the wetland boundary helps to show where cultivation

and other developments should end; this will help the wetland vegetation
to naturally regenerate.
ii) The removal of the construct bunds and drainage channels will help to
restore the wetland hydrology.
iii) The recovery of the wetland hydrology and vegetation will also enhance
the biodiversity i
iv) Areas of degraded wetlands were sketched up during the field exercise
and final reports ,maps produced.
3.2 Paradigm Shift Potential
a) Potential for scaling up and replication

i) Prior to the actual restoration of the wetland, a rapid assessment of the wetland
area to be restored was undertaken and a map developed. The map made it easy
for the stakeholders to appreciate the need to restore the degraded wetland.
3|Page
ii) The stakeholder engagements from the district level, Sub County down to the
village level enhanced participation, support and ownership of the wetland
restoration activities.
iii) The locals in every village provided labor during the demarcation and did not
accept persons from outside their village to engage in carrying and planting of the
demarcation pillars.
iv) This practice was good because the locals obtained an income through provision
of the labor but it also enhanced ownership of restoration in each village.
These practices should be replicated and scaled up in other wetland restoration programs.
b) Potential for knowledge sharing and learning
The reports generated during stakeholder engagements and the actual restoration shall be
used to improve on the understanding amongst different stakeholders on wetland demarcation
and restoration in the district.
c) Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment
The different stakeholder engagements conducted helped to increase awareness of

stakeholders on issues of climate change adaptation and mitigation through wetland
restoration. This awareness created an enabling environment for wetland restoration in the
district.
The demarcation of the wetland boundary will enhance rejuvenation of the wetland
vegetation and hydrology.
d) Contribution to the regulatory framework and policies
The demarcation and restoration exercise improved awareness among the stakeholders of the
buffer distances for lakes, rivers and wetlands as specified in The Nationals Wetlands,
Riverbanks and Lakeshores regulations, 2000 (200M for lakeshores, 100M for riverbanks and
30M for wetlands).
These practices should be replicated and scaled up in other wetland restoration programs.
e) Contribution to climate-resilient development pathways consistent with relevant

national climate change adaptation strategies and plans.
Restored Kopege and Angod wetland system will enhance mitigation and adaptation to
climate change and improve the resilience of the community to climate change impacts.
3.3 District/ Community ownership
The land owners bordering the wetland systems of Kopege and Angod throughout the
demarcated sections were involved in the exercise to ensure ownership. In each village, the
labor was provided by the residents of that particular village so as to enhance.
4|Page
3.4 Efficiency and Effectiveness
Efficiency and Effectiveness (Give information on the delivery of activities, gaps, what
needs to be improved for better delivery, etc)
The preliminary activities conducted prior to the actual restoration were;

i) Rapid assessment of the wetland
ii) Stakeholder engagements from the district to the village level
This approach was effective in promoting stakeholder support and participation however,
more funds should be provided and other incentives to support the demarcation and
restoration exercise
Prepared by
Awekonimungu Margaret W
AG DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA DISTRICTS.
5|Page
ii) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title Activity 3.4.7: Conduct 2 Seasonal Weather forecast impact and
(as is in the agreement) performance assessments.
Ngora district sub county of Odwarat in the parishes of Kopege and
Angod .

Responsible Party
Reporting Date 28TH DECEMBER,2023
Implementation Period: Start Date 24th Aug,2023

(include the start date of the End Date 25th Aug 2023
quarter)
Total Activity Budget UGX 4,458,000/-
Project Site(s)/location Kopege and Angd Vikkge
covered
Sex Male 49
Female 22
Sub Total 71
iii) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

A) Implementation achievements.
 Farmers were able to get trained on related weather forecast
6|Page
 Knowledge regarding climate was delivered
 Timely information on rainfall pattern and outlook was
provided to farmers
 Feedback on the seasonal weather forecast impacts from the user community were
gathered through physical interactions with community of kopege, angod and other
opinion leaders.
 Community were able to know when to start planning for Agricultural activities
through the training by UNMA
 The community were able acquire knowledge on importance of using seasonal
weather forecast in planning and decision making given.
B) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

a description of key milestones of the funded activity achieved during this reporting
i) The activity days had other interference from different programs at the
District this delayed the implementation which led to re allocation of dates for
implementation.
Action taken
i) Other programme was created to ensure the implementation of activity took
place
C) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

i) Communities already know or have been following the traditional methods
for planning when it comes to agriculture
ii) Not all community members had access to weather information
iii) Community attitude on weather forecast information was good because they
learnt more and were interested in knowing what Elnino rains was and how it
comes about
iv) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

Provide a narrative report describing the progress on the funded activity’s
performance against the following.
i) Prior to the implementation of the weather forecast the UNMA team

visits the district to provide the leadership on the intended activity
this made it easy when it came to implementation period.
ii) Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity to
ensure that the are planned is delivered to the right persons.
.2 Paradigm Shift Potential
a)Potential for scaling up and replication

.
7|Page
i) The stakeholder engagements from the district level, Sub County down to the village
level enhanced participation, support the information sharing on weather forecast and its
usage.
ii)The locals in every village provided information on how they have been perceiving
weather information through different forum.
iii) Training was good because the locals obtained knowledge which will help them
plan and make decisions in relation to UNMA presentations. .
b) Potential for knowledge sharing and learning
The reports generated during stakeholder engagements shall be used to improve on the
understanding amongst different stakeholders on weather and climate information for further
dissemination and utilization among the participants.
c) Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment
The different stakeholder engagements conducted by UNMA will helped to increase

awareness of stakeholders on issues of climate change adaptation and mitigation measures
through wetland restoration in the district.
.
d) Contribution to climate-resilient development pathways consistent with

relevant national climate change adaptation strategies and plans.
The seasonal weather forecast and earl warning information will enhance mitigation and
adaptation to climate change and improve the resilience of the community to climate change
impacts.
3.3 District/ Community ownership
The communities’ involvement in the training exercise ensure ownership through right
planning for all the seasons forecasts by UNMA

Efficiency and Effectiveness (Give information on the delivery of activities, gaps, what
needs to be improved for better delivery, etc)
The preliminary activities conducted prior to the actual implementation of the seasonal
weather forecast impact and performance assessment were;
i) Stakeholder engagements from the district to the village level by UNMA
ii) Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity

to ensure that the are planned is delivered to the right persons.
This approach was effective and efficient in promoting stakeholder support and
participation.
Prepared by
8|Page
AG DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA DISTRICTS.

v) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN

(as is in the agreement)
Focal Point of the AG ; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA

Responsible Party
Reporting Date
Implementation Period: 24th July 2023, 26th July 2023
(include the start date of the
quarter)
Total Activity Budget SHS 1,458,000
Project Site(s)/location
covered KOPEGE AND ANGOD
Sex Male 33
Female 19
Sub Total 52
vi) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

D) Implementation achievements.
9|Page
 CFO guided the focal person to bring to the notice of DEC member on
utilization of funds since it was an off budget.
 CFO guided the work plan developed in soroti by technical officers must be
owned by DEC as a district work plan for implementation.
 A concern on inadequate awareness creation on restoration
activities specially in first villages at the onset of the project.
 -Issue of MOU with land lords was raised to be harmonized to ensure
sustainability of the project.
 Issue of MOU with land lords was raised to be harmonized to ensure
sustainability of the project.
 Information sharing to the public on wetland restoration should be a
must.
Commitment of the committee in awareness creation.
 Management plan for the site to be restored were generated and

committees were form to spear head the implementation
E) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

Poor turn up of the technical implementation team
High expectations from the team on the side of facilitation.
 Fear of meeting similar challenge when it comes to implementation like previous sites
F) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

 Information sharing was a road map for success of the project
objective,
 All stakeholders were in support of the project.
vii) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

 The reports generated during stakeholder engagements shall guide the actual
restoration to improve on the understanding amongst different stakeholders on
wetland demarcation and restoration in the district.
10 | P a g e
a. Potential for knowledge sharing and learning
 Awareness creation to prepare community to take up restoration activities
especially during demarcation exercise.
3.2 Country Ownership

The stakeholders involvement in the meeting exercise ensure ownership through right
planning for all project activities.

j) Stakeholder engagements from the district to the village level supported the success
of the activity implementation.
iii) Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity

to ensure that planned is delivered to the right persons.
participation in restoration project.
Prepared by
AG DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA DISTRICTS
11 | P a g e
viii) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title Activity 1.4.7: Establish and operationalize 24 gender

(as is in the agreement) responsive wetland user committees for the restored sites.
Focal Point of the AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER

Responsible Party
Reporting Date 19th Dec, 2023
Total Activity Budget 4,482,000/=

Project Site(s)/location Kopege ,Angod villages in Odwarat sub county
covered
Sex Male 180
Female 107
Sub Total 287
ix) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

G) Implementation achievements.
 Terms of References of the committee members
 Committee was to participate in all restoration activities
 Monitoring and registering issues on demarcated areas
 Having monthly meetings to share different findings on wetland restoration
activity.
12 | P a g e
 The committee is directed to participate during demarcation and have their
records on land ownership especially where concrete pillars were planted.
H) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

Fear of other wetland users who are difficult to relate with in the
community
 Fear of no tools for activity implementations like protective gears-Gumboots
I) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

 Willingness of the committee to support project activities
 The committee has positive response towards activities of restoration
especially demarcation exercise
 The formed committee were able to spear head demarcations right from day
one to the end.
x) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

 The targeted area for restoration had all been demarcated using
concrete pillars and all coordinate points taken for further
recording and reporting.

b. Potential for scaling up and replication
 Willingness of the committee to support project activities
c. Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

 Capacity building of the committee is required
 Continues to engage the committee in all activities;
 Have a modest budget to facilitate the team.
13 | P a g e
d. Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment
 The team existence will enable them handle issues arising and
come with proper solution to address related complaints on
ground in area of restoration.

 Stakeholder engagements from the the village ,parish level supported the
success of the activity implementation.
 Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity

to ensure that planned is delivered to the right persons.
This approach was effective and efficient in promoting stakeholder support
and participation in restoration project.
Prepared by
AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICER/NGORA
14 | P a g e
1) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title Activity 1.4.4: Operationalize Grievance Redress

(as is in the agreement) Mechanism/system (GRM) at the Village, Sub-County,
District and National levels to address complaints arising
out of implementation of Project Activities.

Responsible Party
Executing Institution NGORA
Reporting Date 19TH DEC 2023
Implementation Period: 16TH NOV ,2023

quarter)
Project Site(s)/location Kopege village,parish,Angod village,parish .dwarat
covered sub county

Sex Male 100
Female 81
Sub Total 181
xi) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

a) Implementation achievements.
15 | P a g e
 MOU was signed between district and land lords
 Hard copy of MOU was submitted to MWE for acknowledgement.
Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

 Complains on delayed signed MOU between the Land Lords and Ngora
District LG to guide farmers on usage of the irrigation scheme
 Delayed fencing off the retention facility by MWE which puts community at
Risks
J) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

No respond to delayed fencing by MWE for the last 5 years even when issues
raised directly to MWE
 Transport issues to facilitate the team in distanced places
 Having the team has help identified other complains which were not reported.
b) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA


 The committee formed are relevant to support implementation.

e. Potential for scaling up and replication
 If MWE should respond to the issue of fencing of the retention facility
this will prevent to risks of human and animal drowning.
 Timely disbursement of funds for implementation of activities
 Special budget and allocation of funds to the GRM committee to
facilitate their activities
f. Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

 Awareness creation and involvement of the committee will
guide in implementation
g. Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment
16 | P a g e
 The formation of this committee will enhance the community
participation in restoration activity in the area .
3.2 Country Ownership

The committee involvement in the will ensure ownership full participation of the
community for all project activities.

 community engagements from the village level supported the success of
the activity implementation.
 Community were mobilized to participate in the planned

activity to ensure that planned is delivered to the right
persons.
Prepared by
AG DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA DISTRICTS
17 | P a g e
c) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title Activity 3.1.15: Conduct 4 inspections on environment and

(as is in the agreement) social safeguards compliance to sites where the 1 hydro
meteorological stations were established
Focal Point of the AG;DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER
Responsible Party
Reporting Date 19TH DECEMBER, 2023
Implementation Period: 10/10/2023 – 14/10/2023

quarter)
Project Site(s)/location AGU, KOBWIN, ODWARAT
covered
Sex Male 07
Female 03
Sub Total 10
d) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
18 | P a g e
K) Implementation achievements.
 The place is well
maintained and  -The structure is well fenced
L) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

Political leaders in Kobwin Sub county want UNMA relocate the
site
 Stake holder in Kobwin sub county need direct benefit of the weather station
like other programs of restoration in Odwarat Sub County
 No action taken on this because stakeholder’s urges re allocation of
the site to protect the trees from being cut.
 -No welding of the structure done,
M) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

 Awareness creation on utilization of the structures and its benefit.
 The inspection enable the team to identify what was lacking.
e) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA


 The attendant is available at any time

 Potential for scaling up and replication
3.1 Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

 Issue registered at site obstruction of weather information by
grown up trees
 -Issue of broken door which needed welding
Prepared by
19 | P a g e
AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE

f) GENERAL INFORMATION
Funded Activity Title ACTIVITY 3.2.9: SENSITIZATION OF 20 COMMUNITY MEMBERS

(as is in the agreement) WITHIN THE AREAS WHERE THE 2 HYDROLOGICAL STATIONS ARE
INSTALLED
Focal Point of the AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES

Responsible Party
Reporting Date 19TH DEC 2023
Implementation Period: 24TH -25TH SEPT

quarter)
Total Activity Budget 1, 125,000sh
Project Site(s)/location
covered
Sex Male 12
Female 06
Sub Total 20
g) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
20 | P a g e
a) Implementation achievements.
 Training went on and the community attended in large
number as planned.
 People or community already had knowledge about the
hydrological station
Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

 Difficulty in bringing everyone on board most especially passers-
by who are sometime attracted by the structures since the
stations are located in remote areas.
N) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

 Willingness by community to protect the stations

 Availability of security tracking gadgets in the market
h) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA


 Willingness of the community to protect the site
 Presence of the attendant in place

h. Potential for scaling up and replication
 Awareness creation
 Capacity building of the local communities to protect the site
i. Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

 The districts/local government to always
consider/involve the elected committees to any project
activity in their districts as a way to operationalize the committee.
21 | P a g e
j. Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment
 The committee and all community members to continue raising
awareness on the use of the
hydrological stations.
3.3..Efficiency and Effectiveness
 community engagements from Agu village level supported the success of
the activity implementation.
 Community were mobilized to participate in the planned

activity to ensure that planned is delivered to the right
persons.
 The formation of committee is relevant to the project
Prepared by
AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER NGORA
22 | P a g e

Final Report on Gcf 2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Report on Gcf 2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES, WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS, AND

ASSOCIATED CATCHMENTS IN UGANDA

Final Reporting Activity Template

Reporting Date 27th November,2023

Implementation Period: Start date 20th July, 2023

Number of Participants Age Group Sub

i) Wetland demarcation pillars planted along 1,963 kilometres of the

i) The wetland area to be restored had immature crops planted and

A) Lessons learned during implementation.(Include positive achievements and

i) There is need to provide the affected farmers with alternative livelihood

3. PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE FOLLOWING THE GCF INVESTMENT

3.1 Impact Potential (potential to achieve impact)

i) Demarcation of the wetland boundary helps to show where cultivation

a) Potential for scaling up and replication

b) Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

c) Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment

The different stakeholder engagements conducted helped to increase awareness of

d) Contribution to the regulatory framework and policies

e) Contribution to climate-resilient development pathways consistent with relevant

The preliminary activities conducted prior to the actual restoration were;

Final Reporting Activity Template

ii) GENERAL INFORMATION

Focal Point of the AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICER

Reporting Date 28TH DECEMBER,2023

Implementation Period: Start Date 24th Aug,2023

iii) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

B) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

C) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

iv) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

3.1 Impact Potential (potential to achieve impact)

i) Prior to the implementation of the weather forecast the UNMA team

.2 Paradigm Shift Potential

a)Potential for scaling up and replication

b) Potential for knowledge sharing and learning

c) Contribution to the creation of an enabling environment

The different stakeholder engagements conducted by UNMA will helped to increase

d) Contribution to climate-resilient development pathways consistent with

3.4 Efficiency and Effectiveness

i) Stakeholder engagements from the district to the village level by UNMA

ii) Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity

BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES, WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS, AND

Final Reporting Activity Template

Funded Activity Title STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN

Focal Point of the AG ; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER/NGORA

vi) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

 Management plan for the site to be restored were generated and

E) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

F) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

vii) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

3.1 Impact Potential (potential to achieve impact)

3.2 Country Ownership

3.3 Efficiency and Effectiveness

iii) Community were mobilized to participate in the planned activity

Final Reporting Activity Template

viii) GENERAL INFORMATION

Funded Activity Title Activity 1.4.7: Establish and operationalize 24 gender

Focal Point of the AG; DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCE OFFICER

Reporting Date 19th Dec, 2023

Total Activity Budget 4,482,000/=

ix) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

H) Delays and challenges according to the planned sub-activities. (Include

I) Lessons learned during implementation. (Include positive achievements and

x) PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GCF INVESTMENT CRITERIA

3.1 Impact Potential (potential to achieve impact)