Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKOBRobesity reviews1467-78812005 The International Association for the Study of Obesity.

81310Review ArticlePrevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari

obesity reviews doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x

National Prevalence of Obesity

Prevalence of obesity, central obesity and the


associated factors in urban population aged
20–70 years, in the north of Iran: a population-based
study and regression approach

K. O. Hajian-Tilaki1 and B. Heidari2

1
Department of Social Medicine and Health, Summary
Babol Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Obesity is an undesirable outcome of changing of lifestyle and behaviours. It is
Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran; 2Department of also reversible predisposing factor for the development of several debilitating
Internal Medicine, Shahid Beheshti hospital, diseases. This study was aimed to determine the prevalence rate of obesity,
Babol Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of overweight, central obesity and their associated factors in the north of Iran. We
Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran conducted a population-based cross-sectional study with a sample of 1800
women and 1800 men with respective mean ages of 37.5 ± 13.0 and
Received 25 June 2005; revised 10 September 38.5 ± 14.2 years of urban population aged 20–70 years living in the north of
2005; accepted 14 September 2005 Iran. The demographic and lifestyle data, in particular, age, gender, marital status,
marriage age, family history of obesity, educational level, occupation, occupa-
Address for correspondence: KO Hajian-Tilaki, tional and leisure time physical activity, duration of exercise per week, parity and
Department of Social Medicine and Health, the number of children were collected with a designed questionnaire. Diagnosis
Babol Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of of obesity and central obesity were confirmed by the WHO standard recom-
Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. E-mail: mended method by determining of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumfer-
drhajian@yahoo.com ence (WC). Logistic regression model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio
(OR) and its 95% confidence interval. Over half of the study subjects were at
educational levels of high school or higher; 79.4% of population was married
and 35.3% had a family history of parental obesity. The majority of subjects in
particular women had none or low levels of physical activity. The overall preva-
lence rates of obesity and overweight were 18.8% and 34.8% respectively. The
overall prevalence rate of central obesity was 28.3%. The rate of obesity in
women was higher than men (P < 0.0001). In both genders, particularly in the
women, the rate of obesity was raised by increasing age. There was an inverse
relation between the risk of obesity and marriage age, the high level of education
(OR = 0.19, P < 0.0001), severe occupational activity (OR = 0.44, P < 0.0001),
the level of exercise (in subjects with 3–4 h exercise per week, OR = 0.58,
P < 0.001) and leisure time activity. Marriage, history of parental obesity and
parity ≥5 were associated with increased risk of obesity (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001 and
OR = 2.43, P < 0.0001 and OR = 3.73, P < 0.0001 respectively). The results of
this study indicate an increased rate of obesity and overweigh in the north
population of Iran. With respect to these findings, low level of activity and
education, parity, family history of obesity, marriage at earlier age and ageing are
responsible for both obesity and central obesity in the north of Iran. Therefore,
a community-based multiple strategies are required to combat with increasing
rate of obesity and its subsequent complications such as diabetes, coronary artery
disease, hypertension and osteoarthritis.

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10 3
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
4 Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari obesity reviews

Keywords: body mass index, central obesity, obesity, overweight, waist circum-
ference.

obesity reviews (2007) 8, 3–10

of Iran, situated at the Caspian see in 2004. With presump-


Introduction
tion of 15% obesity rate, the sample size was calculated to
Obesity is an undesirable outcome of changing in lifestyle estimate an obesity rate in which, with a confidence level
and behaviour. It is also a major risk factor for develop- of 95%, the maximum marginal error to be about 0.01.
ment of diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoarthritis (1–7). Since the population of each city was roughly equivalent,
Obesity may lead to early disability and loss of job in the an equal sample size of 900 was allocated for each city. We
majority of subjects because of osteoarthritis as well as conducted a cluster sampling techniques with 30 clusters
diabetes and coronary artery associated complications. The of equal size of 30 subjects for each city. At first step of
medical expense of obesity associated conditions is esti- sampling, the centres of 30 clusters were selected randomly
mated to be about one hundred milliard dollars annually using systematic sampling technique based on cumulative
in the USA (8,9). Although, the contribution of heredity frequency of family health number under coverage of urban
factor may account for about 30–70% of obesity (7), but health centres. In the second stage, around the centre of
intake of high caloric diets and reduced expenditure of each cluster, we selected 15 men and 15 women with rota-
energy in the form of low physical activities, changing tion from the right to the left of cluster centre. Thus,
lifestyle and behaviours, particularly, in the modern societ- on overall, the calculated total sample size was
ies, are also responsible for development of overweight and 4 × 2 × 15 × 30 = 3600 subjects for four cities.
obesity. We carried out indoor household survey, in subjects aged
The prevalence of obesity varies significantly across the 20–70 years. The study population were residence of the
world (10). The rate of obesity and overweight among study areas and were apparently in good health with no
adults population ranges from 15 to 60%. It is usually known systemic or debilitating conditions. Pregnant sub-
more common in women than men (10). According to jects and those on weight loosing diets programmes were
WHO report, obesity has become epidemic in the world excluded. The study proposal was approved by the ethical
(11). Therefore, preventive measures are required to com- committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences (Babol,
bat with obesity and its associated complications. Iran). The written informed consent was obtained from all
Planning health programmes and preventive projects subjects prior to their participation in the study.
require necessary information in the field of obesity for
different geographical areas. In the north of Iran, the prev-
Anthropometric measurements and data collection
alence of coronary artery diseases, hypertension, diabetes
and osteoarthritis is high. Despite the apparent affinity of After an interview and clinical examination, the anthropo-
obesity with these conditions, there is no documented metric measurement of height, weight and waist circumfer-
information in relation to prevalence rate of obesity or ence (WC) were measured by standard method. WC was
overweight in this region of Iran. For this reason the determined by measuring of waist diameter of the level of
present study was designed to determine the prevalence midpoint between iliac crest and lower border of tenth rib.
rates of obesity, overweight, central obesity and their asso- The average of three measurements was considered as WC.
ciated factors in an urban population aged 20–70 years in Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by weight in kilo-
the north of Iran. gram divided to square of height in meter (kg m−2). The
demographic and lifestyle data, in particular, age, gender,
marital status, marriage age, family history of obesity, edu-
Methods and Materials
cational level, occupation, occupational physical activities,
the level of leisure time physical activities, the duration of
Study design, subjects and sampling techniques
exercise per week by hours, the number of children and the
We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study parity were collected with designed questionnaire. The
with a sample of 3600 subjects (1800 women and 1800 diagnosis of obesity was confirmed by the WHO standard
men with respective mean ages of 37.5 ± 13 and recommended method (11–13) in which a BMI 25–
38.5 ± 14.3 years) of urban population aged 20–70 years 29.9 kg m−2 was regarded as overweight; BMI ≥ 30 kg m−2
living in four cities in Mazandran, a province in the north as obesity. Central obesity was diagnosed on the base of

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
obesity reviews Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari 5

WC with cut-off points of WC > 88 cm for women and education, over half of the study subjects were at educa-
WC > 102 cm for men. tional levels of high school or higher. Only 9% of subjects
were illiterate; 79.4% of population were married and
35.3% had a family history of obesity. The majority of
Statistical analysis
subjects, in particular, women had none or low levels of
In statistical analysis, we used SPSS software and chi- physical activity as exercise, occupational activity or leisure
square test used for bivariate data analysis and also we time activity. Low level occupational activity was also com-
applied the logistic regression analysis to estimate the crude mon in men.
and age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of obesity and central Among women the number of previous pregnancies var-
obesity risks for different levels of demographic and life- ied from none to higher than five; 19.9% of women had ≥ 5
style factors. We also estimated the 95% confidence inter- and 33.8% had 1–2 and the remainder had no history of
val of OR. The P-value less than 0.05 was considered as pregnancy (22.6%) or no parity (22.9%).
statistical significant level. The prevalence rates of obesity and overweight are pre-
sented in Table 2. The overall prevalence of obesity and
overweight were 18.8% and 34.8% respectively. The over-
Results
all prevalence rate of central obesity by WC criteria was
The characteristics of the study population who enrolled in 28.3% (women 46.2% and men 10.6%). The rate of obe-
the study are shown in Table 1. Regarding the levels of sity in women was roughly three times greater than men

Table 1 The distribution of demographic characteristics and lifestyle-related factors with respect to gender

Characteristics Male (n = 1800*) Female (n = 1800*) Total (n = 3600*)


n (%) n (%) n (%)

Age (years)
20–29 620 (34.0) 608 (33.8) 1228 (34.1)
30–39 392 (21.8) 447 (24.8) 839 (23.3)
40–49 347 (19.3) 373 (20.7) 720 (20.0)
50–59 245 (13.6) 254 (14.1) 499 (13.9)
60–70 196 (10.9) 118 (6.6) 314 (8.7)
Education
Illiterate 100 (5.6) 227 (12.6) 327 (9.1)
Primary level 233 (30.0) 338 (18.8) 571 (15.9)
Elementary level 311 (17.3) 326 (18.1) 637 (17.7)
High school and college 778 (43.3) 655 (36.4) 1433 (39.8)
University level 377 (21.0) 254 (14.1) 631 (17.5)
Marital status
Single 451 (25.1) 289 (16.1) 740 (20.8)
Married 1348 (74.9) 1511 (83.9) 2859 (79.4)
Parental obesity
Absent 1211 (67.3) 1116 (62.0) 2327 (64.7)
Present 588 (32.7) 683 (38.0) 1271 (35.3)
Exercise (h week−1)
None 942 (52.4) 1172 (65.8) 2114 (59.1)
1–2 h 352 (19.6) 367 (20.6) 719 (20.1)
3–4 h 209 (11.6) 140 (7.9) 349 (9.8)
≥5 h 294 (16.4) 103 (5.8) 397 (21.1)
Occupational activity
Low 1072 (59.6) 1241 (69.0) 2314 (64.3)
Moderate 618 (34.3) 529 (29.4) 1147 (31.9)
Severe 110 (6.1) 29 (1.6) 139 (3.9)
Leisure time physical activity
Very low 927 (52.0) 1101 (61.2) 2026 (56.6)
Low 450 (25.2) 435 (24.2) 885 (24.7)
High 290 (16.3) 211 (11.7) 501 (14.0)
Very high 117 (6.6) 53 (2.9) 170 (4.7)

*lack of corresponding of sum of frequencies of subgroups with sample size was due to the missing data.

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
6 Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari obesity reviews

Table 2 The prevalence of obesity and overweight based on the distribution of BMI and central obesity with respect to age groups and gender

BMI Age groups (years) Total


n (%)
20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–70
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

Male gender
Underweight (BMI < 18.5) 27 (4.4) 5 (1.3) 4 (1.2) 5 (2.1) 7 (3.6) 48 (2.7)
Normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.9) 397(64.1) 177 (45.3) 148 (42.7) 104 (42.4) 96 (49.0) 922 (51.3)
Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 29.9) 151 (24.4) 166 (24.4) 152 (43.8) 107 (43.7) 74 (37.8) 650 (36.2)
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) 44 (7.1) 43 (11.0) 43 (12.4) 29 (11.8) 19 (9.7) 178 (9.9)
Central Obesity 31 (5.0) 45 (11.5) 36 (10.4) 45 (18.4) 33 (16.8) 190 (10.6)
Inappropriate WC (WC > 102 cm)
Female gender
Underweight (BMI < 18.5) 56 (9.2) 15 (3.4) 2 (0.5) 3 (1.2) 1 (0.8) 77 (4.3)
Normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.9) 328 (53.9) 135 (30.3) 48 (18.9) 48 (18.9) 33 (28.0) 619 (34.5)
Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 29.9) 150 (24.7) 173 (38.8) 141 (37.9) 100 (39.4) 39 (23.1) 600 (33.5)
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) 74 (12.2) 123 (27.4) 154 (41.4) 103 (40.6) 45 (38.1) 499 (27.8)
Central Obesity 150 (24.7) 208 (46.5) 232 (62.2) 169 (66.5) 72 (61.0) 831 (46.2)
Inappropriate WC (WC > 88 cm)

BMI, Body mass index; WC, Waist circumference.

(P < 0.0001). The age distribution of BMI was also signif- (Adjusted OR = 0.22, P < 0.0001). Parity was also associ-
icantly different between two genders. In both genders, the ated with increased risk of obesity. In women with five or
rates of obesity raised by increasing age. The lowest obesity more pregnancies, the risk was increased by 3.73
rates in women and men were 12.2% and 7.1% for age (P < 0.0001).
groups of 20–29 years and the highest rates were 41.9% Regarding to central obesity, factors such as age, female
and 12.4% for age group of 40–49 years respectively. The gender, having five or more pregnancies, parental obesity
elevated rates persisted up to 60 years for both genders. were associated with increased risk of central obesity as
However, the rate of obesity was consistently higher in well. Whereas physical activity, occupational, exercise; or
women compared with men in all age groups. leisure time activity as well as higher educational levels and
In Table 3, the estimated OR (with 95% CI) of obesity marriage age at 30 years of old or older were associated
are presented. With respect to results derived from logistic with decreased risk of central obesity. The adjusted OR for
regression model compared with age group of 20–29 years, central obesity for women (compared with men) was 8.47
the OR has increased to 2.32, 3.55, 3.38 and 2.41 for age (P < 0.0001). The risk of central obesity was significantly
groups of 30–39, 40–49, 50–59 and 60–70 years respec- lower at marriage age of 30 years or higher compared with
tively. The age-adjusted estimates of OR for female subjects 20 years or less (OR = 0.18, P < 0.0001).
was 3.64 times greater than male subjects (P < 0.0001).
There was an inverse relation between the risk of obesity
Discussion
and the levels of education particularly at university levels
(OR = 0.19, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the risk of obesity was The findings of the present study indicate an overall prev-
decreased by 56% in subjects with severe occupational alence rate of 18.8% for obesity and 34.8% for overweight
activity (OR = 0.44, P < 0.001). Additionally, by increasing and 53.6% for both obesity and overweight in population
the levels of exercise, the risk of obesity was decreased. of Iranian aged 20–70 years who are living in north of Iran.
There was a significant decrease in OR for subjects with 3– The mean ages of both genders in the study population are
4 h exercise weekly compared with subjects with no exer- lower than expected. However, this sample truly reflects the
cise (OR = 0.58, P < 0.0001). Leisure time activity was also general population of Iran. Because, over the half of the
associated with non-significant decreased risk of obesity. adult Iranian population are younger than 40 years, owing
Marriage and history of parental obesity were associated to lack of birth control over the first decade after Islamic
with increased risk of obesity (adjusted OR = 2.2, revolution. Both obesity and central obesity were more
P < 0.0001 and OR = 0.43, P < 0.0001 respectively). In prevalent in women than men by age adjusted OR of 3.64
contrast, there was an inverse relationship between the and 8.47 for female gender. In general, 61.3% of women
marriage age and risk of obesity. Compared with marriage and 46.1% of men were fat or overweight.
at 20 years of age or lower, the risk of obesity decreased With respect to results derived from logistic regression
by 78% with marriage at 30 years of age or higher analysis, risk factors for obesity and central obesity are

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
obesity reviews Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari 7

Table 3 The estimated crude odds ratio (OR) of the risk of obesity and age adjusted odds ratio with different levels of demographic and lifestyle-related
factors with 95% confidence interval (CI) using logistic regression model

Variables Crude OR(95% CI) Age adjusted OR(95% CI)

Age group (years)


20–29 1.0 (–) –
30–39 2.32 (1.80, 2.99) –
40–49 3.55 (2.76, 4.56) –
50–59 3.38 (2.57, 4. 45) –
60–70 2.41 (1.73, 3.55) –
gender
Male 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Female 3.5 (1.73, 3.55) 3.64 (3.01, 4.40)
Education
Illiterate 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Primary level 1.07 (0.79, 1.43) 0.98 (0.72, 1.32)
Elementary level 0.59 (0.44, 0.80) 0.60 (0.43, 0.84)
High school and college 0.38 (0.29, 0.50) 0.41 (0.30, 0.56)
University level 0.16 (0.11, 0.24) 0.19 (0.12, 0.29)
Marital status
Single 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Married 3.69 (2.75, 4.96) 2.20 (1.56, 3.09)
Parental obesity
Absent 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Present 2.14 (1.80, 2.53) 2.43 (2.04, 2.90)
Occupational activity
Low 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Moderate 0.92 (0.77, 1.10) 0.91 (0.75, 1.09)
Severe 0.46 (0.26, 0.81) 0.44 (0.25, 0.77)
Exercise hour/w
None 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
1–2 h 0.81 (0.65, 1.01) 0.90 (0.72, 1.12)
3–4 h 0.58 (0.42, 0.81) 0.67 (0.48, 0.93)
≥5 h 0.68 (0.51, 0.92) 0.85 (0.63, 1.16)
Leisure time physical activity
Very low 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
Low 0.82 (0.66, 1.00) 0.87 (0.71, 1.07)
High 0.79 (0.61, 1.02) 0.86 (0.66, 1.12)
Very high 0.67 (0.43, 1.04) 0.71 (0.45, 1.10)
Parity
None 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
1–2 2.52 (1.73, 3.67) 1.92 (1.27, 2.88)
3–4 6.18 (4.26, 8.97) 3.44 (2.15, 5.49)
≥5 6.82 (4.61, 10.11), 3.73 (2.22, 6.27)
Marriage age (years)
<20 1.0 (–) 1.0 (–)
20–24 0.45 (0.37, 0.55) 0.46 (0.27, 0.56)
25–29 0.23 (0.23, 0.40) 0.28 (0.21, 0.37)
≥30 0.25 (0.15, 0.42) 0.22 (0.13, 0.37)

similar. Increasing age, marriage age, presence of parental The results of the present study are somewhat different
obesity, lack of exercise or having low level of physical from the results reported from other geographical areas of
activities and low level of education were the major respon- Iran. In a study of Tehranian population living in 17th
sible factors for both obesity and central obesity in women district of Tehran, the overall prevalence rate of obesity and
and men in north of Iran. However, the association of overweight were 30.5% and 37.8% respectively (14). The
marriage, parental obesity and parity with obesity was higher prevalence rate of obesity in the latter study may be
stronger than central obesity. attributed to lower level of activity in particular occupa-

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
8 Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari obesity reviews

tional physical activity in Tehranian population than north at younger age in women, compared with men. Because, in
population who frequently do agricultural activity. female population, marriage around the 20 years of age are
In another study of Iranian population living in central usual in the north of Iran. Additionally, sex hormone asso-
part of country (Arak and Isfahan) the prevalence rate of ciated factors may be also responsible in female obesity.
obesity and overweight were similar to ours. In the latter Because, body weight and BMI are inversely related to sex
study the respective prevalence rates of obesity and over- hormone binding globulin concentrations, both in pre-
weight in the female and male subjects were 27.1% and menopausal and post-menopausal women (34).
10.4%; and 35.2% and 35.4% (15). In this study we have also determined the prevalence rate
In another study of Tehranian adult population living in as well as the risk factors for central obesity. Since substan-
low socioeconomic area in south of Tehran during 1999– tial evidences indicate that increased WC or waist to hip
2001, Azarbakht et al. have reported an obesity rate of ratio (WHR) independently predict obesity associated
29.1% for women and 14.2% for men (16). In the latter comorbidities and mortality (4,12). In this study we deter-
study, the prevalence rate of obesity in Tehranian male mined central obesity based on WC criteria. In our study
population was higher than north population whereas the prevalence rate of central obesity by WC criteria was
the rate of obesity in female population were similar. In lower than those with WHR criteria used in Tehran Lipid
another study of Iranian population, living in an urban area Study (66.1% and 32.1% for women and men respectively)
in south of Iran, the prevalence rates of obesity and over- (29). However, in our study, the WC indices were corre-
weight were 12.5% and 36.5% respectively (17). The sponded to those reported by Ghaderipor et al. in a study
higher rate of obesity in the north may be explained by of Isfahan population in central part of Iran (35).
higher socio-economic condition in the north population, The association between central obesity and parity as
as well as the local eating habits in the north who custom- shown in our study was also observed by Kau et al. (36).
arily use high carbohydrate diets. Furthermore, jobs with In this study abdominal obesity was observed in 50.7% of
severe physical activity are more frequent in the south women aged ≥35 years who had ≥ 2 children (36). The
rather than in the north of Iran. overall prevalence rate of abdominal obesity in a study by
The prevalence of obesity in other parts of the worlds Ramos et al. was 39.2% (22). In another study be Riyami
varies according to geographical regions. The data from et al. in adult population of Oman country (31), 64.4% of
the present study are comparable to those studies that women and 31.5% of men had abdominal obesity (31).
included similar ethnic population or was performed in the The results of this study, in accordance with the previous
geographical areas similar to north of Iran. In the Euro- published studies, confirm an epidemic of obesity and over-
pean countries the lowest rate (7%) was reported from weight in both developed and developing countries
France. In general, the overall prevalence rate varies from (24,37,38). In the USA, the prevalence of severe obesity
10 to 20% in men to 15–25% in women (18,19). The (BMI ≥ 40 kg m−2) has increased from 1 in 200 to 1 in 50
prevalence rates of obesity and overweight in Spain were subjects during 1986–2000. Furthermore, the prevalence
40.6% and 56.6% respectively; however, there is a trend rate of obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg m−2) has roughly increased by
for raising (20). In Irish and Brazilian population, the prev- two times (24). In the developing countries, because of
alence rates of obesity were 18% and 32.8% respectively transition of population from rural to urban areas and
(21,22). In the USA, the prevalence of obesity and over- owing to changing in lifestyles, there is a trend for increas-
weight were 21.2% and 36% respectively (23,24). In a ing of obesity rate. For example, over a period of less than
study of Canadian population, 27% of women and 35% 5 years, there was a significant trend in increasing of obe-
of men were found to have a BMI > 27 kg m−2 (25). The sity and overweight in adult population of Tehran Lipid
respective prevalence rates of obesity in adult women and Study (29).
men in a number of Middle East neighbouring countries, In comparison to world wide statistics, the obesity rate
such as Lebanon (26), Saudi Arabia (27), and Bahrain (28), in north of Iran is slightly lower than those reported from
were 18.8% and 14.4 5, 26. 6% and 17.8%, 47.7% and neighbouring countries such as Saudi Arabia (27), Bahrain
21.2%. (28), as well as from Venezuela (37) and the USA (23,24).
The association between lifestyle and obesity as shown The different prevalence rates of obesity in different parts
in this study was also observed in studies from other coun- of the world may explained by changes in lifestyle pattern,
tries (22,26,27). The negative association between educa- nutritional status, physical activity and local eating habits
tion and obesity has been also shown in other studies from of different population.
Iran (29,30) and Oman (31). The association between low In this study, the pattern of obesity and overweight has
level of physical activity and obesity was also shown in a significantly increased by age. Similar patterns were
study from Iran (29) as well as in other countries (32,33). observed in other studies from Iran (15,29,35). Further-
The higher prevalence of obesity in female subjects in our more, age has been considered as a prognostic factor for
study can be explained by higher marriage rate particularly obesity in a setting of published studies (26–28,36).

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
obesity reviews Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari 9

During the two recent decades a significant transition of 8. Wolf AM, Coldiz GA. The cost of obesity: the US perspective.
rural population to urban areas has occurred in the geo- Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 5(Suppl. 1): 34–37.
9. Wolf AM, Colditz GA. Current estimates of the economic cost
graphical areas of the present study because of economical
of obesity in the United States. Obes Res 1998; 6: 9701–9706.
problems. Although, there was no baseline data in this 10. James PT, Leach R, Kalamara E, Shayeghi M. The worldwide
study area for comparison. It seems that this migration obesity epidemic, Obes Res. 2001; 9(Suppl. 4): 228S–233S.
resulted to lifestyle changes and subsequent increasing of 11. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Manag-
obesity rate in recent decades. On the other hand, changes ing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation of obe-
sity. WHO, Geneva, 3–5 June 1977.
in lifestyles may affect as well as physical activity and result
12. Khaodhiar L, Blackburn GL. Obesity assessment. Am Heart
to lower physical and occupational activities in urban com- J 2001; 142: 1095–1101.
pared with rural population. 13. World Health Organization. Obesity: Prevention and Manag-
Hence, in the north population of Iran, local eating habits, ing the Global Epidemic. WHO Obesity Technical Reports Series
lifestyle pattern and utilizing high caloric foods should be 894. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
14. Fakhrzadeh H, Pourebrahim R, Nouri M, Baradar-Jalili R,
also considered as predisposing factors of obesity. Because,
Javadi E, Rahimi E, Shoshtari-zadeh P, Larijiani B. Prevalence
high carbohydrate containing foods such as rice and bread of overweight and obesity in normal population of area of 17 in
are customarily utilized almost by the majority of popula- Tehran. Proceeding of 2nd congress of prevention of non-
tion in north of Iran. Therefore, in addition to above factors, communicable diseases, Tehran. J Med Res Shahid Beheshti
intake of high carbohydrates containing foods should be Univ Suppl 2003; Suppl. 27(4): 283.
15. Akhvan-Tiab A, Klishadi R, Sadri GH, Sabet B, Toloui R,
also considered as a cause of obesity in the north of Iran.
Baghai AH. Healthy heart project. Prevalence of obesity in central
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate an part of Iran. J Gazvin Univ of Med Sci 2003; 26: 27–35.
increased rate of obesity and overweigh in the north pop- 16. Azadbakht L, Mimiran P, Mhrabi Y, Azizi F. A survey of
ulation of Iran. With respect to these findings, several vari- trend of obesity prevalence in Tehranian Adults during 1999–
ables such as low level of physical activities and education, 2001. Tehran Lipid Study. Proceeding of 2nd congress of preven-
tion of non-communicable diseases, Tehran. J Med Res Shahid
parity, family history of obesity, and marriage at earlier age
Behesti Univ Suppl 2003; Suppl. 27(4): 131.
are associated with obesity. Therefore, a community-based 17. Salam Z, Shikh-Fathollhi M, Sajadi A. Prevalence of obesity
multiple strategies are required to combat with increasing and central obesity in adults aged >30 in Rafsanjan/Iran. Proceed-
rate of obesity and its subsequent complications such ing of 1st congress of prevention of non-communicable diseases,
as diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension and Tehran. J Med Res Shahid Beheshti Univ Suppl 2001; Suppl. 26(3):
105.
osteoarthritis.
18. Seidell JC. Obesity in Euroupe. Obes Res 1995; 3(Suppl. 2):
89S–93.
Conflict of Interest Statement 19. Varo JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA. Obesity prev-
alence in Europe. An Sist Sanit Navar 2002; 25(Suppl. 1): 103–
No conflict of interest was declared. 108.
20. Rodriguez AF, Lopez GE, Gutierrez-Fisac JL, Banegas JR,
References Lafuente UPJ, Dominguez RV. Changes in the prevalence of over-
weight and obesity and risk factors in Spain 1987–1997. Prev Med
1. Seidell JC. The impact of obesity on health status: some impli- 2002; 34: 72–81.
cations for health care costs. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 21. McCarthy SN, Gibney MJ, Flynn A. Overweight, obesity and
19(Suppl. 6): S13–S16. physical activity levels in Irish adults: evidence from the North/
2. Groessl EJ, Kaplan RM, Barrett-Connor E, Ganiats TG. Body South Ireland food consumption survey, Proc Nutr Soc 2002; 61:
mass index and quality of well- being in a community of older 3–7.
adults. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 126–129. 22. Ramos de Marins VM, Varnier Almedia RM, Pereira RA,
3. Ridker PM, Genest J, Libby O. Risk factors for atherosclerotic Barros MB. Factors associated with overweight and central body
disease. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P. (eds). Heart Disease: fat in the city of Rio de Janeiro: results of a two stage random
A Text Book of Cardiovascular Medicine, 6th edn. W.B. Saunders sampling survey. Public Health, 2001; 115: 236–242.
Co.: Philadelphia, PA, 2001, p. 1024. 23. Hassan MK, Joshi AV, Madhavan SS, Amonkar MM. Obesity
4. Rao SV, Donahua M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Fuster V. Obesity as a and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional analysis of the
risk factor in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2001; 142: US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 2003; 27: 1227–
1102–1107. 1232.
5. Eckel RH. Obesity and heart disease: a statement for health 24. Sturm R. Increases in clinically severe obesity in the United
care professional from the nutrition committee. Circulation 1997; States, 1996–2000. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2146–2148.
96: 3248–3255. 25. Macdonald SM, Reeder BA, Chen Y, Despres JP. Obesity in
6. Gaziano JM. Global burden of cardiovascular disease. In: Canada: a descriptive analysis Canadian Heart Health Survey
Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P. (eds). Heart Disease: A Text- Research Group. CMAJ 1997; 157(Suppl. 1): S3–S9.
book of Cardiovascular Medicine, 6th edn. W.B. Saunders Co.: 26. Sibai AM, Hwalla N, Adra N, Rahal B. Prevalence of and
Philadelphia, PA, 2001, p. 15. covariates of obesity in Labanon: finding from the first epidemio-
7. Eckel RH, Krauss RM. American heart association call to logical study. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1353–1361.
action: obesity as a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. 27. al-Nuaim AA, Bamgboye EA, al-Rubeaan KA, al-Mazrou Y.
Circulation 1998; 97: 2099–2100. Overweight and obesity in Saudi Arabian adult population, role

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10
1467789x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00235.x by COMSATS Inst of Info Techn - I, Wiley Online Library on [12/05/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
10 Prevalence of obesity K. O. Hajian-Tilaki & B. Heidari obesity reviews

of socio-demographic variables. J Community Health 1997; 22: choices, alcohol intake and smoking in the 1982–1997. Am J Clin
211–223. Nutr 2002; 75: 809–817.
28. Musaiger AO, Al-Mannai MA. Weight, height, body mass 34. Yoo KY, Kim H, Hang D, Ha M, Park SK, Lee BO, Cho SH.
index and prevalence of obesity among the adult population in Female sex hormones and body mass in adolescent and post meno-
Bahrain. Ann Hum Biol 2001; 28: 346–350. pausal Korean women. J Korean Med Sci 1998; 13: 241–246.
29. Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Prevalence and associates 35. Ghaderipour M, Mohamifard N, Asghari S, Naderi GA. Prev-
of obesity in Tehranian adults. Tehran Lipid Glucose Study. Int J alence of obesity and Cardiovascular risk factors in Esfahan. J
Endcorinol Metab 2004; 5(Suppl.): abstract. Ghazvin Univ Med Sci 2003; 26: 26–64.
30. Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Maddah M, Nagshpour P, 36. Kac G, Velasquez-Melendez G, Coelho MA. Factors associ-
Mohtasham-Amiri F. A study of obesity prevalence in middle age ated with abdominal obesity among childbearing-age women. Res
women in Rasht city/Iran. Proceeding of 2nd congress of preven- Saude Publica 2001; 35: 46–61.
tion of non-communicable diseases, Tehran. J Med Res Shahid 37. Delpeuch F, Maire B. Obesity and developing countries of the
Beheshti Univ Suppl 2003; Suppl. 27(4): 260. South, Med Trop 1997; 57: 380–388.
31. Al-Riyami AA, Afifi MM. Prevalence and correlates of obesity 38. Saw SM, Rajan U. The epidemic of obesity: a review. Ann
and central obesity in Omani Adults. Saudi Med J 2003; 24: 641– Acad Med Singapore 1997; 26: 489–493.
646. 39. Campos G, Ryder E, Diez-Ewald M, Rivero F, Fernanardez
32. Gutierrez-Fisac JL, Guallar-Castillon P, Diez-Ganan L, Lopez V. Raleigh, Arocha-Pinango CL. Prevalence of obesity and hyper-
Garcia E, Banegas JR, Rodriguez Artalejo F. Work- related phys- insulinemia. its association with serum lipid and lipoprotein con-
ical activity is not associated with body mass index and obesity. centrations in healthy individuals from Maracaibo Venezuela,
Obes Res 2002; 10: 270–276. Invest Clin 2003; 44: 5–19.
33. Lahti-Koski M, Pietinen P, Heliovaara M, Vartiainen E. Asso-
ciation of body mass index and obesity with physical activity, food

© 2006 The International Association for the Study of Obesity. obesity reviews 8, 3–10

You might also like