Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRAMMAR
GRAMMAR
Grammar
This page is a bird’s eye view of Na’vi grammar. It’s just to give you a feel for how Na’vi
works, focusing on things that are probably unusual to most readers. It will not teach you
the language. If you want to learn more you should check out the many resources
offered here at LearnNavi.org
Tripartite
In English, we mark the role a noun is playing in a sentence by word order. A sentence like
a dog bites the man is quite a different state of affairs from the man bites a dog. In Na’vi,
the role a noun or pronoun plays in the sentence is marked by changing the ending of the
word rather than by word order.
These endings, called “cases,” are fairly common in Human languages, too. What is more
unusual, though, is that in Na’vi the subject of a transitive verb, such as frìp to bite, is
marked differently than the subject of an intransitive verb, such as hahaw to sleep.
There are other case endings for different syntactic roles in Na’vi, for possession, for
indirect objects and for topics. The forms of the endings change according to both fixed
sound rules and style. See one of the fuller references for all the forms that can appear.
In English, nouns and pronouns can be either singular (house, dog, I) or plural (houses,
dogs, we). Na’vi has these, but also has the dual for when there are two of something and
the trial for when there are three. Plenty of Human languages have a dual (even English
once had dual pronouns), but the trial is rarer.
The Verb
The verb is perhaps the most complex part of Na’vi grammar, not only because of the
different ways its meaning can be extended, changed and refined, but also because the
form these changes take: infixes. Rather than adding to the beginning or end of words,
such as the noun case and number markers, Na’vi verbs get syllables inserted into them
to express different grammatical ideas and to extend the meaning of the verb. For
clarification, infixes can be highlighted with angled brackets around them, as in, for
example, ‹ìm›, the near past marker.
Na’vi verbs can be marked for tense, which will be very familiar to speakers of European
languages, including English. What is less familiar to anyone who hasn’t studied, say,
Native American Indian languages, is that Na’vi doesn’t simply mark past and future, but
distinguishes the recent past from the general past, and the near from the general future.
Both of these future tense forms mark a prediction about a future event.
Na’vi also has a set of infixes which mark how the speaker feels about the state of affairs
they are describing. For example, the infix ‹ei› indicates the speaker feels good about what
they’re saying, while ‹äng› means they’re unhappy.
As hinted at in the discussion on noun cases, Na’vi word order can be very flexible
because the case endings let us know who’s doing what to whom. Since word order
generally isn’t needed for syntax, Na’vi uses it for style and emphasis. For example,
Frommer has said that the end of the sentence is “where the ‘punch’ is,” making it like
English and Latin in putting emphasis at the end of a phrase.
However, though the order of subjects, verbs and objects is free, within noun phrases
Na’vi word order is more strict. For example, an adjective that’s modifying a noun has to
stay right next to the noun, to which it is connected by attaching an a to the adjective on
the side closest to the noun.
References