Professional Documents
Culture Documents
110309_2022_Exam Soln for Stream
110309_2022_Exam Soln for Stream
1
Question 2
• The impact of changes in the exchange rates on monetary assets and liabilities are
gains or losses that recognised in the profit and loss statement. (0.5 mark each, total
1 mark)
• The items at risk are the monetary items. (0.5 mark)
• The final financial statements, after translation, will reflect amounts that would be
recorded had the transactions or events been originally recorded in the functional
currency. (0.5 mark)
Applying the requirements of IAS 21 as they relate to translating the accounts from a local
currency to a
particular functional currency means that the final accounts, after translation, will reflect
amounts that would be recorded had the transactions or events been originally recorded in
the functional currency. As paragraph 34 states:
When an entity keeps its books and records in a currency other than its functional currency, at
the time the
entity prepares its financial statements; all amounts are translated into the functional
currency in accordance
with paragraphs 2~26. This produces the same amounts in the functional currency as would
have occurred had
the items been recorded initially in the functional currency. For example, monetary items are
translated into the functional currency using the closing rate, and non-monetary items that
are measured on a historical cost basis are translated using the exchange rate at the date of
the transaction that resulted in their recognition. (IAS 12)
2
• The exchange differences no direct effect on the present and future cash flows from
operations (0.5 mark)
• The exchange differences would be presented as a reserve- a foreign currency
translation reserve (1 mark)
Question 4
3
31 March 2021 Shares in Manuka Ltd 150,000
Gain on shares in Manuka Ltd (P&L) 150,000
(Gain on shares in Manuka Ltd
= 100 000 x ($6.50 - $5.00))
Question 5
This means that the bond will be issued at a premium and at an amount that causes the
effective interest rate provided by the investment to become equal to the rate of return
required by the market. This is because the market was requiring a lower rate (for example,
8 per cent), but the coupon rate was higher (for example, 10 per cent) which will cause
demand for the bond to be higher. This would push the price of the bond up to the point at
which the interest payments on the higher price, plus the repayment of the principal, provides
an effective rate of return equal to the rate required by the market. That is, the effective rate
of return will equate to the market’s required rate of return on the bond.
Yellow highlights represent main points of discussion: sub-total = 3 marks
Question 6
A financial instrument is defined in NZ IAS 32 as:
any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity
instrument of another entity (NZ IAS 32). 1 mark
c. Inventories
Not a financial instrument.
This is a physical asset, not a contract.
1 mark
4
There is no contract for tax.
1 mark
[TOTAL = 20 MARKS]
Question 7
This is a broad question and students could draw on a number of areas to earn the marks
allocated, but must include:
a) At least one of eight Institutional Factors.
b) At least one example of how religion influences accounting.
c) At least one of Hofstede’s ‘cultural dimensions’.
d) A forward-looking conclusion that indicates awareness of what Harari’s quotes warn
– essentially that our increasingly global culture needs to evolve and with it accounting
standards so that we move from an unsustainable continuous growth mindset to a
sustainable mindset, including actions which reverse global warming.
See below for some guidance as to what students can reasonably include in their discussions
on 1-3 above.
(Up to 2 marks for each of the above points and additional points, depending on quality of
answers, up to a maximum of 10 marks)
5
Code/Civil law – more statues; in most non-English speaking countries (Europe origin);
accounting rules in those countries tend to be legislated
2. Taxation: high (Europe) vs. low (UK/US) conformity in tax v book income
3. Corporate ownership: concentrated vs. dispersed ownership
Concentrated – few large shareholders; low disclosure/ transparency
Dispersed – many small shareholders; demand for disclosures/transp.
4. Capital markets/financing:
Debt - banks (Germany, Japan) or Gov (China) v equity - shareholders/families (UK/US)
5. Political
History; invasions; colonial heritage; political systems – capitalist v socialist v communist
6. Economic
Economic development; growth; inflation; agricultural v manufacturing v services …
7. Summary of Institutional Factors
6
c) Hofstede’s ‘cultural dimensions’
d) Conclusion
Examples of what students could refer to in their conclusion include:
• Growing calls and actions to incorporate indigenous cultural views in areas currently
dominated by western cultural beliefs (e.g., legal recognition of the rights of nature in
NZ in respect of the Te Urewera National Park and Whanganui River and similar Earth
Jurisprudence developments in Latin America – Barrett et al, 2020);
• Recent emphasis by accounting standards setters on the importance of External
Extended Reporting i.e., the need to integrate and report on more than just financial
aspects of the operations of entities (e.g., XRB’s recent work on standards concerning
TCFD requirements; IFRS Trustees formation of the ISSB).
SECTION D: GROUP/CONSOLIDATIONS
Question 8
7
Question 9
Question 10
8
(5a) Dr Profit on sale of plant 262,500
Dr Plant 144,000
Cr Accumulated depreciation 406,500
Adjustments for intragroup sale of plant
Allocate 1 mark for each correctly stated journal – that includes the correct amounts and
correct Dr or CR to the correct account. ½ mark can be allocated where the journal is partially
correct in those respects.
Summary/ Conclusion:
Both 'near cash' assets decrease while less liquid assets (especially inventory) increase 1
Inventory also increases in relation to TA's, so overall liquidity has deteriorated 1
Available marks 9
Maximum marks 5
9
Question 12
Segment Reporting
Question 13
Insurance, banking, and agriculture are reportable segments as their revenue is more than 10
per cent of total segment revenue, thus satisfying test (a). Insurance [1], banking [1] and
agriculture [1] qualify as material using test (b), as the absolute-amount total of the
profits/losses of the segments that earned a profit is $180 000, whereas the combined
reported loss of those that generated a loss totals $15 000. Hence for test (b) we need to
compare the absolute amount of the profit/loss with $180 000. Using these criteria,
Insurance, banking and agriculture are reportable operating segments. Using test (c),
Insurance and banking are reportable operating segments, as their assets are 10 per cent or
more of the total segment assets of all segments. Therefore, Insurance, banking and
agriculture are all reportable segments. Telecom is not a reportable segment [2], as it did not
pass any of the three tests.
Insurance, banking, and agriculture also generate more than 75 per cent of the entity’s total
revenues (510/555 x 100 = 92 per cent) [1], and so meet the test of paragraph 15 of IFRS 8.
Note that even though we have considered each segment under all three tests, the passing of
only one of the tests would be enough to establish a segment as reportable.
10
Related Party Disclosure
Question 14
a. Yes. Such persons are regarded as key management personnel of the entity. [1 mark]
b. Yes. Under IAS 24, paragraph 9, the children, spouse or domestic partner, other
children of the spouse or domestic partner, and dependents of the key
management person or of their spouse or domestic partner, are all regarded as related
parties of the entity. [1 mark]
c. Yes. IAS 24, paragraph 9 considers members of the same corporate group to be related
parties. [1 mark]
d. No. If the share investment made by the employee is an arm’s length transaction and
the terms and conditions are not more favourable than would occur with other non-
related parties, then the dividends on those share investments are not regarded as
related party transactions. If the employee is a key management person or their close
family members, then, yes, the dividend payment to that employee would be
considered a related party transaction. [1 mark]
Record harvested timber at fair value less costs to sell. An acceptable alternative is to credit
the Forest asset. This can also be done by including the above entry and Dr Profit or loss
150,000/Cr Forest 150,000. Either alternative would give an offsetting difference in the
change in fair value of the forest for part 4.
Profit or loss 60,000
Cash 60,000
[1 mark]
Cash 160,000
Sales revenue 160,000
11
Question 16
Profit = (1,700,000 – 1,600,000) [1] - 100,000 - 60,000 + 160,000 - 10,000 = $90,000 [1]
Alternatively, if the student credited the Forest asset in part 2, the adjusted value of the forest
is 1,600,000-150,000=1,450,000, and so the profit calculation is Profit = (1,700,000 -
1,450,000) [1] - 100,000 - 60,000 - 150,000 + 160,000 – 10,000 = $90,000 [1]
12