Bar Council of India

All India Har Exart1ination - XV

24 11'-Jan-2021
[Set Code-DJ
LAN(;IJA(;E- HlNDI

1-- - - --·- · - -·. _

---- - -- --------- -----
=--=-1-· ·--·- .·- �,_;_=-=_·-_·-_·_-_·---__________
......
Name o/ the C��didat;

Roll Numbi,� .
--------------1
I
Enrollment Number :
- .
IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS
is question paper)
(Kindly rer,d these instructions carefully before attempting th

• This Booklet contains 100 questions and each question carries 1 mark. .. .
• In case of any confusion in translation, kindly refer to the English version for clarif,ca(io�.
• Make sure that same Question Booklet Set code is mentioned on all the sheets of question paper,
in case of any change immediately inform the invigilato r.
• There is no negative marking.
• Durat ion of this exam is 3 hours only.
• Fill in your Roll number and Question Booklet set code v ery carefully, ·as the ans�er sheet will be
evaluated as per the code you mention on the answer sheet.
• Under no circumstances will tiie ariswer sheet be evaluated with any other Question Booklet Set
code
• Only books and notes are allowed for this examination.
• Mobile phones, laptop, tabs and/or any other e�ectronic d ev�ces are strictly profiibited in the
examination hall.
• On possession of any electronic device inside the examination hall, the candidate will be
disqualified from the examination.
• Ca�didate shall not be allowed to leave the Ex�m_ination Hall be/ore the conclusion of the
examination.
• Do not forget to submit the answer sheet back to the invigilator. Failing to do so would lead to
disqualif ication.
• Use only bl ue/black ball pen to fill the OMR answer sheet.
• OMR filled with pencil or ink pen would be disqualified.
• Use of whitener/ eraser /blade or fluid is strictly prohi bited. It will lead to disqualification.
• Do not make any stray marks or t ear th e OMR answer sheet. It will lead to disqualification.
• Write your roll number carefully and dark en the correct corresponding ovals. In case wrong ovals
are darkened yo ur answer sheet will not be evaluated.
• Candidate must follow the instructions stri ctly as mentioned on the answer sheet.
• Make sure to get this question paper also signed by the invigilator this will be requ ired for any
,_ ___��if�������ro��

Invigilator's Signature
BCI-JAN-21 AIBE-XV HINDI-SET-D

1. fndemnity cont r act is defined under/�� ffl«f �� �� �r.t�� �

mM�ft!l11 A���� mn � 3ftfrrU��
a) Section 124 of the Indian Contrac t Act/ � d) ;.ff of the above� �aft
3r.J1"l�$UTU124 5. Under t he Paten t Act which o f the follo wing are not
b) Section 67 of the Indian Contract Act/� patentable?���� f;!J.ci�ft.11 �
��zmd,'tUTU67 � lf,t.Hrr fu � � *?

c) Section 127 of the Indian Contract Act/� a) a metho d of agriculture or horticulture/�· m

��®UTU127 ,11m11.fi � �
d) Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act/� bJ a presentation of information� <nt �
��ci\'tUTU128 c) topography of Integra ted circuits/��
®Faii11<£1m
2. Peek Vs Gu rney is a famous case related to/�
i1in1{��¢.t���-mmri d) Atrof the above��
6. Wo rld Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has
a) Coercion/JliiH!Rfi
replaced pre-existlng/fctJU' � � �
b) Fraud�
(WIPO)������q;r��f;
c) Mistake of fac� ® mrcft
a) GATT/ GATT
d) Mistake oflaw�di't� b) BIRPI/ BIRPI
3. .Pre Supreme Court invoked the principle of c) TPRM/TPRM
'Transformative Constitutionalism' in the case d ) �CT/ PCT
of��<);�-\� cm? q�4�if�ftc;J 7. �nuradha Bhasin Vs Union Of India on 10 January,
2020 relates to a challenge under Article 32 of the
���fc1,zrr? Constlt\Jtlon seeking issuance of an appropriate
a! Navtei Sin11h Johar Vs Union of India writ/� mfr-f ilifl1f lffel<1o1 n� 10
(2018)� �� � 3fu:J;
�- 2020l1i1'��$�32**
�(2018)
� � ftc (writ)�� c8I' Jmn'll'<Jiffii
b) Suresh Kumar Koushal Vs Naz Foundation
a) for setting aside orders'ofthe Government by
(20101Ajhr�c1l'h�ilc'im��c201O> which all modes of communication including
c) Naz Foundation Vs Government of NCT of Delhi, Internet have been shut down in J&K/lRiliR $
12009)/c'Jr;;nl� � • <,..,,�1;?1 l$r
3lJ �rltl) e.<Pcf;o11< q,Tc'l'f��3ltt
fficliR, �(2009)
d) Aruna Roy Vs Union of India, (2002)/� �
.rrrm � m �<2002 > ��mft'� ,.
<fi��-l�lmamnl$mf'r�QT

b) for setting aside orders of the Government by··

4, The provisions of Indian Penal Code apply also to any which private property was sought to be
offence committed by/� �� $� acquired in J&K� $��it �e.<fbklit
��,ft3mTt1c);fiwifl'N17J.��ft1;� ���Jftt��it��c);
�lft�tmr�mrr�;;h J<Rl�JE,01��11m���
a) any citizen of India in any place without and c) for setting aside orders of the Govern ment by
beyond lndia;/ffit'cf 1t m � tR � afr � which J&K was constituted as a UT�<); 3"
QT� 4Tc:rr � afr � iil•l�<fi •, ,.
�it � e.<fctii11< �� ��-3'tt
b) any person on any ship or aircraft registered in·
<fiQ� �� Q��r� � �i
India wherever it may be� aft� ml d) for setting aside orders of the Government by
mra 1l �� ,rr�mffmmtR, � which Ladakh was separated. /lf«fiR <); 3"
��3fr� �it<ma<fc)i.t1<l1i<'ifT��i-rtflD'�
c) any person in any place without and beyond
India comm itting offence targeting a computer
3tt-17T�mrri
8. �ection 66A of the Information Technology Act was
resource located in India. /W«" 1t 'll'T
3lm qt struck down under Art. 19(1) (a) read with Article 19
�ifl'�QT���aft�;;h (2) In the c.ise of/�Qi'Hilf�H'/[r/iff�
BCI-JAN-21 HINOI-SET•D
AIBE-XV
� "!'
l Review/ RJJftJ<h
rtk}j�W <li �{if
11#.mffi1;c;Tl9(1) (a) Jlk'
66A c) ExeIusIon of Judicia _ .,
�19(2) ,;;.JirPfa'.li/Tft.;rhlff.�flJrt/T <J�bQ,,tUT
a) Ju stice K
. s. Puttaswamy Vs Union of d) f;Jk)f the above/:J(Rtm
lr3lt
lndla�<)i. � ':Ji'llf<JIAI � � 13. <l'n and from commencement of the Hindu
Act, 2005, in a Joint Hindu
�� Succession (A::ndment) rring
Mitakshara law, confe
b) Kharak si"gh Vs State of U.P./� �� family governed by the . .
R new
status by subst ,tutln
on daughter coparCenarv .
� �� �
�3tRi;mr section for/fffin�ml'¥iITTT�
c) Govinda vs State of M.P.� ilc'lm � � )�, 2005
��- ��(��!Nvf
�T qi'
cf\'!' �3ffii �, <'lV Jfcj� Qfc?t:Pt
1Rlc1 � i)tr
d) Shreya SinghaI Vs Union of India/� ffimr 'Um$ �
��cffr�tRmfr�
��lrnii�
9. Article 1 4S(3) of the Indian ConstltutiS?n states that ¢:
The minimum number of Judges who are to sit for .a1 Section 6/ � 6
the purp ose of deciding any case involving a b) section 10/ URT 10·
substantial question of law as to the interpretation c) Section H/ Qf{T 11
of this Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any
d) .section 13/ URT 13
refere nce under Article 143 shall be .... /�
14. Section 5 of Hindu Marriage Act relates to/�f<rcm;
145(3) ����it� A.(•11'1.li �
��URTS���t: -·
-;;ir ��cm��$$�.�� t
a) Void marriages/��
����� aki��.
b) �oidable marriages/�� (<n$' lm')
'Q'.,rt� � 143 ��� �
c) Ceremonies of Hindu marriage/� � $
":f-'1<1141
a) Twom, �
. dl ,l,6nditions of Hindu marriage�� cf\'!' �Rf
b) .ihree�
15. � marriage between a girl of 22 years marries her
,
c) FiveitITTT . maternal uncles' son of 23 years in accordance with
d) 1"1ne� the Special Marriage Act. Such marriage is/ftr�N
10. M.C. M·ehta Vs Union of India 1986 Shrlram food and .fmlif;�c);�22�ct't�c1iTfcmlf
Fertilisers case relates-to�.�- � il<'fm �
� � c); 23 ?f(t c); tt-� � i m ��
30to� 1986 iilRm � tis q,ft�1$'11:A fll'rfr � a) Valid� WIT
��� ', b). Voidable/� W1T
a) Olieum Gas feak/30ft:rtm �cJiT fTI:m:f- c) Void�� WTT
b) Ganga water cleaning/mTT �cf1t �
d) Valid only in north India� � ffl«'f 'al.�
c) Child labour,'<ITR 'llii
.�
d) Bonded labour�3IT � 16. The principle of Res Judicata is dealt under Section -
1 J,. A. K. Kraipak Vs Union of India relates to/ Tt. <t;. � •• of CPC/l(�.-<IFQ � � � � �
i1illH Hr«r#u�f �URT----$��t
a) Likelihood of Bias/�;/i'/-� a) 9/9
b) 10/ 10
b) Delegated Legislation/ URJl<ll� !llilr,:r
c) 11/ 11
c) Administrative Discretion/ rn'"1'fii!f;,; fcretc1i d) 12/ 12
d) Notice/� 17, · Section 14 of the C.P.C. deals wlth/C.P.C. cf1t 'Um 14
l2. Judicial control of Delegated Leglslatton may be ����
exercised on the ground of/ URJl<llf.Jm fcJtn;:rc,;r a) Presumption as to decisions of
;:m'/jji/i f;rlflur �.HTflrr qrffiilff �7minT t tribunals/���;);���
_;,,( Doctrine of Ultravlres/� il'i7 � 'b) Presumption as to foreign judgments�ft
b) Malafides/Jf/iiflW$�R
�i)i�;l�
BCI-JAN-21 AIBE-XV HINOI-SET-D
_,.c)· Presumption as to Ju dgments of the lowe r
c) search �nd selzures,mmr 3ltt ii{ldi?;�fr
cou� �$�$�� �
dl p� bargaining� Jttnff�ao ;,fr
d) Presumptio n as to Judgments of High Cour t�
23. �curltV for good behaviour from habltual offenders
Hl\•Ui-44 .); �-ot.:p�; �1t � ls.dealt under/Jfm,rf �� 3r.:\lil"fflcl'cf:r
1a. A, residing in Delhi, publishes In Kolkata statemen t
s �ffl��i:
defamatory of B. B mav sue A/A, ��� llmf <1if
a) Section 109 ofCr.P.C./�� �
� � 8 fl m101f.!'Ucl' ;Jt1o1e,l�Q>F(q\ � 'Mi-i4\li:'fl
3fij9ITTT 109
���t;I B,A$��<ol�'t;
. /���cJiT
b) Section 110 ofCr.PC

a) Only in Delhi�� 1t J,.jawf 110

>c) Section 111 ofCr.P.c.;i;?; � � <1iT
b) Only in Kolkatafi)icr <'f q,)1'14ii<'U 1t
c) in both the place of Delhi and Kolkata/� � 3foijafl"JT111
dl Nooe of the above� ��
q,)i,iQ\lc1I M�q{
dl either in Kolkata or in Delhi. 24. �i:tion 105 (H) ofCr.PC
. deals/� l0SH ifi1
/ttT � � 'll'T
� f.?IM�ftia �� � t;
.il\)!'14ile1I A
19. Which provision underCriminal procedure Code, a) Forfeiture of property in certain cases. /'<Jf3
1973 deals with the procedure to be adopted by the �il�<li)'��
Magistrate to record confessions and statements? b) N�.ti_c�of forfeiture of property/���-
,���. 1973 q,f� mm- ���
� t; � 3'Qm°JI diQ4c. ml f4'14il{)f$ c) Management of properties seized or
3h�ct<l'ir.fc);fi:lv �;;rrcrrt,7. forfeited� m ��if$ tiQRl<il q,1 wrvr
a) Section 162/� 162 d) Identifying unlawfully.c1cquired property/3flhl
b) Section 164/Qm 164· �� ' �����
':, ! . ; . . . - ..
c) Section 163� 163A 25. r
Ba to taking cognizance after lapse ·of the period of
. .
d) S�tion 165/'qTU 165 limitation - is dealt under�� <flt R int
20. �ach'ment of property of person absconding can be ��<li)-�1t�����
done under Sectlon'-:7 ofCr.P.C. / .�,�� c); �i� �Qfrl;mmt'nld\'1-�mui);
�cf;'r�_JIIQ<1Rl4i��- cffitoo .......
·.:·,·��
��;;nmi:·,·
��� �� i a)• secti�n·i1s·�fCr. P.C./�U�niftc=n
a' ) 83/83 <fl't 'qTU 178,'
b) 82/U-
c) 85/85 bl.Aection 469 ofCr. P.C. /���
d) 8818'6 tr�469
21.. �agistrate may dispense with personal attendance c) Section 478 ofCr. P.C. /�qf/J;'lJT�
of accused under Section•··- ofCr.P.C/ JIIQ,(IRN;
��478
��. 'lfi'tmu---;); 3@7re1 tRQf?;c �
d) Section 16i!'�fCr. P.C./� ��
3!Bt.:jif><li)' air.t...1a � ;);�� �
�'qTU168
l!cl'ic'IT i
aJ 201/201
26., />ffecree-holder" means/"��• <liT �t
b) 204/204 a) any person in whose favour a decree. has been
c) 205/205 passed or an order capable of execution has
d) 200/200 been mader,mf aft�� tfa-1' if� ftsli'I'
22. Section 265A to 265L,Chapter XXIA of theCriminal � <flt � t; 'l1T f.?11Sq1ac1 � � "R$ �r
ProcedureCode deals with the concept of /�
� 1Tm t;
265A � � 26SL, � \Tft1;m mt;a'T, � XXIA lliT_ b) any person In whose favour a decree has been
��tmvrr�?,- passed or an order Incapable of execution has
a) Unlawful Assembly/Jhcf\1,J..fl � � ';;l"tRT � been made� aft�� qff 1l � �
bl Arrest without warrant/ftl;n'm 'fl, ni:i1h-11fl
 HINDI-SET-D
...
.BCI-JAN-2 AIBE•XV
1
. � ,tr-Ptril�tl!R��A�
rr
i:n1ti cftt- "It t;- m �itQlc..., -� fillv lf� �r
. � �� ���f;t<I;��
� 'J'Rn' i �t:R�""" t-,
) any Citiz e
. ..
i;en
_-""' .....=-ri-A*tr<fi 3ftm'll'c);�
en in whose favour a decre has b �f <(>Vl
1--..
c cm C(>I -f1d1

p of eKecutlon has
· assed or an order capable �-��'t;-
bee n made
,rcmt' aft
..,1a1�<li � trfl � "Qqi
. n 256
of IPC/IPC cl>'t � 256 � � .
a) Sectio
� qJfu:r <1;t ;rt � "lll �!tQlc.<1 <); � �-� . f IP C /IP C cl>'t � 192 � �
b) Section 19 2 °
�T��� of lPC�/IP. Ccfit�195A��
c) Sectio . n 195A .
d) any corporation in whose favour a decree has Ccnr � 201 l); � ,
of rP C/IP
been p asse d or an order capable of �Kecution . .on 2 01
d)· Secti
. Indian Contract Act, wher e a
has been 'tnade,rcmt aft f.:m1f �- q� � � 30.. Under se 70 of th e
. :t� does anything for another person, or
person la
� QJfra <1lt � � llT �Wlc..-l <); � �ft'm' u � · him' not intending to do so
deI.iver5 anyth1ng to
h 0 ther person enjoys the
Sl$r�-rm� gratu,·tously and sue
27. ' of, the latter is bound to make
�oluntarily throwing or attempting�!? throw acid is benefit th ere
. former 1n resp ect of, or to
an offence punishable under/�'ttJHf�� compensation to the . . . .
done or delivered. This pnnc1ple
· tore, the th'ng
res 1 so .
l!T��<lil����<);.3rcmn'(!'ili" �·.;fi't � 70 c);
is known as/3fl./.cft.!f �
� 3fQ"11lt;"- �
aml'i� ��$f'ffir
https://www.xamstudy.com
�' �cmf
a) --S�&tion 326 B of the Indian Penal Code/�
� 3fi cl'i«tT t m � WCJ 3ft � t ffi � W �
�
$fi:l'Q"��t-"R��$��
��cfit�3268
b) Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code/�­
��i"'����cm��
���� 120 B
1J"Q' <lirn <);� �3fTcwlT � $ fi:rlJ' � i. �
c) Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code/��
�c:ITT<RIT�i
�cfit�S09
a) A Contri!.��-o! Uberrimae fide/56'<i'ht1 �
d) Se<:.tion 295B of the Indian Penal Code/�
<hl.--t<R
-�-�<ffr'UTU 295 B
b) Implied Agency/$L<'ll$s �
28. �,is at work with a hatchet; the hea·d flies off and
kills a man who is standing by. Here, If there was no c) Quantum meruit� cRftc'
want-of proper caution on the part of A, hls act Is/ d) Oe nova contract/!l' .=mi, Cf\l.-�<fl
"A" 1>�1-� �<mf_cliH'�'Pc'!Ti-1 ��cf;{
3l, _Agreement is/t!cfl$1'1dl <Rl'T�?
3sc'ft � � �i:rn;-�cm �t :kmm­ .
a) � promise or set of p�omises forming
�i1' �"A"<); oo��<l'tl <R"ff-� consideration to each.ath.l?r� � llT i:rn; �
r.r-.m- � 7.1m' � mt
•' I •

�ifflt7T�"A"c);00�.1l<IT- tR
a) An Offence of murder� <lil� ;m.:JT b) en.forceable by law�gmarl_��
�I C)··· enforceable contract/� m �.
b) An offence of Culpable homicidefit-t $•Oc.c1c1
�cliT3{trotT11'1e'!T� d) Un enforceable by la:.V� ID'U ��
�
c) Not an offence/3l'tR'N � ;m.:JT � I -�
32. Under the land Acquisition
d) An Offence of causing grievous hurt� m?: Act, the eKpression
"land" in�ludes/a:@t � ��.Qcfl <)i �;
� cliT � ;m.:JT ;;inmr I
29,. A, with the intention of causing Z to be co_nvicted of
� "31Pr" � -HfRi� t
a criminal conspiracy, writes a letter in lmit,tion of a) benefits to arise out oT
land/� *
��
Z's handwriting, purporting to be addressed to an �<'11'3f
accomplice In such criminal conspiracy, and puts the
,b) th ngs attached to
let ter in a place which hlricnows that the officers of '. 'the earthflI�* �
�
the police are likely to search - A has committed an c) things permanently
fas tened to any thing
. to the
attachea
offence under/ A, z <ITT� mf�m c); fffir � earth�
;,n � � �
� 3fi���t��� �
� $ � �. Z <n'J �<lllc1l cffr � 1l, �
*�i
311QURM � c); c1R � � � c); i:rn; m� � d) All of the above� �aft
BCI-JAN-21 HINDl-SET-0

33. Temporary occupation of waste or arable land, a) Power of the Courts to engage experts/ftlfl)lr,m
procedure when diffe rence as to compensatio n
� ffl� � � l1iT r<ti<llc➔m <1if �
exists is provided under� m �
mTI? 3lf)t Q'{ bl Establishment of Special Coun/ftl�°'rr( r414,1Nli
�ll'it;;IT.��� t-'tiJl)tm $
ifll'f�
��i
cl Expeditious disposal of case/� <1iT ��
a) Section 32 of Land Acquisition Act/I��
�
mt�4"' �um 32
d) Specific perfor mance with regard to
b) Section 30 of und Acquisition Act/��
contracts/��� 1t ftlfm
JlojQli;j<1
mt�4il �� 30 37. In which of the followin� case the offence of sedition
c) Section 35 of Land Acquisition Act/�� was ln issue/f.)J.o1ft:lffl!c11t1"<o'tomf��
��4il �� 35 �ttkiRra°t;:
di Section 31 of Land Acquisition Act/�� al Queen Empress Vs Bal Gangadhar Tilak�
��4il �� 31 �ilraml'M�
3-4. X, Y, Zjointly promise to pay A an amount of Rs. b) Niharendu Dutt Mazumdar Vs Emper�r/�f,il«;
S0.000/- Subsequently X, Y became untraceab le. can � "'""'141< "� 'Q'1=Q'{{
t
A compel Z to pay?/ X, Y, Z � � 50,000 /.
c) Kedar Nath singh Vs State of Bihar � � �
�<fit�q;r�m<oTmc;T�i,i!TGJl
X, Y � � � °t;. � A � m c); fi:tq Z cl\i �mm�
d) · All of the above/3°CR'@i mft
���i , 38. �iberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage
a) A can, under Section 43 para 1/A, cum 43 reliRious feelinRs of any class by insulting its religion
qfh,3� 1 c); Cffi' � � � or religious beliefs. - is an offence under/:.,,icii(.$,t<fi<
bl A can under Section 49 para 1/A, CURT 49 Qfh&. m c;tnc1.-11q_ll'\ �. � 3t�lf f�;�fuft cm�
1 $ � cfit �?; •� � � jl QAl<'IJt<'lc:fi fr.r.lQ'm°t lJiT � cJil$
c) A cannot and will have to wait till X, Y become � aft�� �.mcl\i � �i.
tr�ceable/A m � � �. X JlR Y $ � f.).foift:lftl<9 ���cum��¥ i
���$TT. ;,)_ .itction 295/cum 295
d) Z can be compelled only for one third/Z cl\i � b) Section 29SA/qm 295A
�tft:tq����i c) Section 26SA/'llm 265A
35. -Delivery of goods by one person to another for some
d) Section 276/cum 276
purpose upon a contract that they shall, when the
purpose is accomplished, be returned or disposed of 39.. .Lk18er Section 29 of Cr.P.C. The Court of a C�ief
according to the directions of the person delivering Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence
them. This process is termed as� ��WU: authorized by law except/ .,IIQ{IRrc,i ,;ifl,;tjr �.
� 'Um 29 ��. � ,..,,U�c:fi iirJlt{c:. c8I'
'roll' c); fi:tq � � fflT � cl\i � cf;t ftc-flufl,
�ftl;�lf'FJ� �.����� ��ml�� 3ft �cl\i cnftn
3liJ'ffll �
$�It$ 'lll \;IQEltil � I � ?lil�f;.�.
�ZR��i a) A sentence of death���
a) Agency� b) Imprisonment for life/� ct\i<i<ll�
b) &ailment/� 9- I mprisonment for a term exceeding se11en years.

c) Guarantee/11l'm
/fl'Tc1' ri � � � � c); � c:fiFU<l.FH
d) All of the above/3llmti �
dl Contingency/lliclifl.J1ilic1i
40. Provision regarding filing of suits by an alie n under
36. Section 14A inserted by the THE SPECIFI C RELI EF
(AMENDMENT) ACT, 2018, relates to/ the Code of Civil procedure is dealt under/.-tiJl�<li
ftnW!
fl�lti?II !AMENDMENT) .lffllf.ili'1, 2018 Qi 1'1Um ����'C?'Qi�frmTlj<li4.RT�

� <fit 1T1ff QRT 14A � Qftlft �f; � t ant Jl �� � � f.'tcreT � t

a} Section 21A/tmT 21A
BCI-JAN-2l HINDI-SET-D
AIBE-XV
. the strike does not per se spell
b ) Se ction 1 � 15 45 · "Mere 11egallty".of stice Krishna
.
Iyer. Name the case·
S
unjust!f lablllty Ju
I

c) Sec tion 218� 21B

='77T'Tnt
=r::r<RJ'11f;f;rt/fJ(ff a?" J{'ff'R' JIRli<llJ.uf �
If'-''",,.,
'<><N <$Tif!HiRT{
t
rfft' llircft ;!: �F"JfZll?'.
d) Section 3 +-
8 /W<T 83
41. An Order tate Vs Its workmen/ iTt; Amf
iss
1908 as Per ued
by court under Civil Procedure Code a) Chandramalal Es
order XXI, rule 46, for recovery of
amount due to ju dRment creditor - is known crFtci!r111Tn,q;i/i14cticfl
bl Associated ce ment ltd., Vs Their
as��� 1908, � fc!lm:J 46 � 3{$r
workmen/ (R{)ffl< t°s
1 #t#c �{)/es RrH i1iT,f
XXI � ��ml'���ftl;m�i
��
����ifilITTTT����� Vs Gujarat Steel Tubes
. c) .Gd)arat Steel Tubes
�: Rft'N PF'��
Mazdoor Sabha/,prmr
a ) IT Ord er/�� Rfm'��NHT
b) Garnishee Order/11.ftQfi �r d) Indian General Navigation of Railway Co. Ltd., Vs
c) Decree Holder order��<l'iT 3{$1 . Their workmen/ tr;ru ci;rre:ft �{)/es $ HT7?f/7r
d ) � Order�<l'iT :H$r · ;;,;:rrr;r ;rcl'mtr;r, �:Rf;#ilil7I' cR'i1 cfl71
42. Section 88 read with Order XXXV of the Code of Civil 46. A workman aggrieved by the order of
Proced ure, 1908 deals withtff:ifc«;r � �� ....................................... may directly make an
application to the labour court or tribunal for
�r XXXV � Qm 88, 1908 RlJ.cif<:lnlla A 'R adjudication of the dispute and the court/tribunal is
fcm:m�� empowered to adjudicate such dispute as it had
al fnterpl eader suit/3ic1<ll�<.1 � been referred to it by the appropriate
government�q\14<1'ic'n ....................................... c);
b) Interlocutory Order/Jic1,M,)<.1 �I
c) Restitution Order� 3{$1 �r"R����c);�c);ft:rtr �

d ) Attachment Order/Jlcji-1• .-J<l'i J{T?Qf iA.11<.lli-lll <IT� 1.ln � � �� �

43. The national consumer dispute redressal commission ll I � cm � � c); � cm
3ft< A.II41i-l
-was constituted in the year/��� �mq;r�i<Rl'ifcl;���
I?!clHo1 3fl<IT3T <l'iT m5of<J� � f<om � � mr��mrrt;
a) 1988/1988 a) Dismissal, discharge and
b) 1998/1998 retrenchment/iilu/FHP1', � ��
c) 1999/1999
d) V¥.17/1997 b) Dismissai; disch;rge, �etrenchment or otherwise
44. What is the limitation period applicable to the three termi�ation of servlcei•lti.l'l@Jh, �- �<IT
forums in entertaining a complaint under The
Consumer Protection Act,1986� � .3fii-<I'� � � �
�.1986cl, ���m.lcflcl't c) 'Oischarge simpliciter exclusiveiy� � �

mif'q{����lRl'Tt?
a) 3 years from the date on which the cause of
action has arisen,'31l' n1i'ror � 3 <lit f;m �
<ITT � c/'iT ffiUr � f.3!T �
47.
b) 5 years from the date on which the cause of
action has arisen,'31l' � °8" 5 <lit� <1'rt'ra
<ITT� c/'iT ffiUr � sJfT �
c) 4 years from the date on which the cause of
action has arisen/311 nrt'n:l °8" 4 c7'6' � i'ITfror
<ITT� c/'iT ffiUr � s3fr �
��
d) Dismissal and retrenchment exclusively���
t�� ��
11s major means/�'li<'Hl'iT�i
a) Act of God/3t"J'T<Jr.; ml�� m·
b) Act of Individual� ID'U ftJ;m JTllT cfITTl
c) Act of othetpa rty/� tJ� mt R JTllT �
d) Act of plaintiff/� mt� JTllT '1ml'
48. According to Classical doctrine of Act of State in law

d} 2 years from the date on which the cause of of Torts means�������

action has arisen,'31l' nrt'n:l � 2 � � � 1); � � u;r � i
;.m � c/'iT coR'OT � f3fr � a) an act of the sovereign Pow er of a country, that
cannot be challenged, controlled or Interfered

.
 BCI-JAN-21 AIBE-XV HINDI-SET-D

with by municipal courts/ftlilft �I if.'t fflnj Qlfi!t; cl Dur d1•11 of �iroof �s to own,•,�h ip/f<llf.tt..-a <); l'l'.f
<J;T V<1i 31�. � <=13HQl�4il W.rnnl i:m 1t � 4il �
�-�m�W'.1����� d) Proof of guitl. /.}fQTI'U � UJIT17T
b) an act of the Jud iciary of a countr y, I hat carrnot
52. Ji((ctlOJl 113 (A) of lhc Evl denr.,i /\ct deal� with/ffl�<I'
be challenged, controlled or interfered with by
��<lill �!Um 113A f<f;lm��
municipal courts� � �
I .=mll� <J;T
ii) Presumption as to abetment of murder/rrlll
� ffl, � ;TTR � Hll <ll i-Flil iITTT �.
�i);�'llT�4il�
f.!l<iftc=rm�nt"t�:nr�t;
b) Presumption as to rape and abetment of suicide
cl an act of t he soverelsn powe r of a country, that
by a woman��$ <lr-11�1< )ft°{�
can be chal lensed . controlled or interfered with
ffi'IT <J;T
by municipal courts/fc1ilft �I�� �$�4\T�
c) Presumption as to abetment of kidnap of a
� �. �a�l<Ql�4il .-41<lli-t4l ml
girl��� ����4\T �
�.�m����� d) Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a
d) .f)lene ;f the above����� married woman� ftl<11fl;R � �
49. :iK1orts, all persons who a id, or counsel, or direct or
1 Jilc-11�?-1• ���r<m �
join in the committal of a wronsful act, are known
1'fie Supreme Court has legalised living wills and
as��- mn-� ��mrnm$�� passive euthanasia subject to certain conditions in
� ����?;. �t�f;. ��?; the case of/ 1JdtH ilitt-itPf� ;f� �rnfiii
m�.r.,-rai����;;fJv!T�i
a) Abettors /3ft4ilc'l<lll'tl
b) Joint tortfeasors� � �
iii(�,
;rvt;:,;;f!fc«:r illft'lR{J/tr f.'!t�4 $r;./J)J[<-j W tJw

a) Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug Vs Union c?f India

c) Tort holders/ift� (2011)/JRroi'T � f/'filZl17T iT,;T7r Hm1 #£1
d) Tort holders in commori/ift � � 4irnif (2011)
b) CoJ))fl'llfn cause Vs Union of India,. (2�18) S sec 1.
so. A is accused of wasing war against the Government
of India by taking part in an armed insurrection in ; wm:r m iT,;T7r mrrr#rJ, r2018J s scc1.
which property is destroyed, troops are attacked, c) Gian Kaur Vs State of Punjab (1996)/ fir.m;r fli'ft
and goals are broken open. The occurrence of these
iTrfl7{ rr.;rriT �(1996)
facts is relevant, as forming part of the general
transaction, though A may not have been present at d) D Chenna Jagadeeswar Vs State of A.P.
all of them. - under which section of the India (1988)/��,w.rrr,;, ;m,mr�
E�idence Act. / A Q"{ mi<!I' � � m«'I' m<1iR $ (1988)
S4. Article 310 of the Constitution mentions
�����i�����
ab-�ut�4iT�3lO�i!Tti�t
t �tn prc;IT � �t �"Ha-��� a) Doctrine of Immunities and Instrumentalities
�;;f@Jt;I�������
with reference to civil servants�� i);
��l-'Q'� Qltlf71<lit;, � A 3<,<'!'��� � 1' �lffiU3l't �< 3Q4i<on i1iT �
� � �t; . �� m«i ma-� �f.h,11 b) Doctrine of legitimate expectation with reference
z8I' � Qm c); � � t to civil servants��<); �-A�
a) Section 12/tmT 12 3'Qffll1il�
b) Section 6/UITI 6 c) Doctrine of natural justice with refer ence to civil

c) Section 3/UITI 3 servants��<);� j Qt<{i�cti �

lliT�
d) Section 5/URT 5
d) Doctrine of pleasure with reference to civil
51. �ion 110 ol the Evidence Act deals wlth/ftlt�
servants is� mrQ\'t l)i � 1' ctil lfl'I
Jifllf.)Zl'1 <-nt tmT 110 � � �
�
a) Documentary Evidence/a@1il:;t ftlt'l7
S5. Right to know the antecedents of the can didates in
b) Exclusion ol Oral Evidence/� mt� l1iT
the election flow from/'cfoiltr � � 31.Jflacll-U i);
ilf't.iS4i<DI
��llil�
a) Article 19 (l)(a)/�
19 (ll(a)
 HINOI-SET-0

j �m-�'tr �
b.l "ttrticle he r Sin gh vs State of Pun ab/
20/� 20 cl .81iams
c) Article
13/� 13 �rfJ(fd1¢
�
al Pradesh Vs Tara Dutta/
d) l\rticle 14/� 14 d) State of Himach
56· <n the fJ'ifT'71fRT c';ffT
Preamble of the Indian Constitution, the {?.JliiJR' �'
exp re ssion • er A owes 8 rupees 10,000
'liberty' is followed by the wor
ds/ 59. The quest·1on Is , wheth
wing statemen�are relevant
��dltuh'li<kll i ·�· � � Which of the follo
�"% i lf<ll A, B qi)
m� under Evidence Act;
ma-<1 � � �
c); ��1'7ui'l' it� lli't.m �Ii?:��
a) Of status and opportunity� 3ttl � � 10,000 � <1iT � i I
b) Of thou
ght. expression, belief, faith and ;l ��<TI� ll1'1ifJ14i �?
�k'lf"Afiifri
wo rship �.�.�.� Ji\"{ C to lend him money, �
a) The facts that A asked
� fi:n_r �
�� c'l'Uf ;;¢( A � C <1>1 � � �
c) Assu ring the dignity of the individual� <flt s presence and hearing- "I
b) D said to c in A'
murr � )IT� aclT advise you not to trust A,
rupees,"��
for he owes B 10,000
dlt��-����
d) Justice, social economic and political/�.
�IJll�<h � 3lh ,(1-:iicf!RM
n;ff ���mmr�����t
�3'fl$tlll'�<1iT10,000���t'
5 7, The Plea Bargaining is applicable only in respect of.
those offences for which punishment of c) A went away without making any answer/f.lc:rr
impri sonment is up to a period of/"Plea Bargaining"
�;;rar.J�m;IT�
�3.;JmMl);mit��t:��
d) � of the above���
<hl,(l<IH'l ��� 3fctRl ......... �c,qii- 60. ·so much of s�ch information, whether it amounts to
a) 7years./7� a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact
b) l0years/10 � thereby discovered by the police may be proved

c) llyears/11 � under��� il"f' mfl ::;tlc-14ilft, mt�

c:t1 � �ears/14 ri ",.l.i-tc11.i1 4,) u!JNIfac1 <li«fr � m <l't't. � f<I; tffera
58. "From a plain reading of Section 195 Cr.PC. it is oomm-r:rUf � ��. � icn'lo�<flt
manifest that it comes into operation at the stage :;rr �t;
when the Court intends to take cognizance of an
offence under Section 190(1) Cr PC.; and it has a) Section 25 of the Evidence Act/mt� �
nothing to do with the statutory power of the police ��2S
to investigate into an F.I.R. which discloses a
b) Section 26 of the Evidence Act/mt� �
cognizable offence.... In other words, the statutory
power of the Police to investigate under the Code is -�'i.TTn.26
not in any way controlled or circumscribed c) �ttion 27 of the Evidence Act/ID� �
by Section 195 Cr.PC." - This was held by the
�mTI27
Supreme Court in the case ofRft� �� 195
d) Section 29 of the Evidence Act/ID��
c:,q3Jm3'1WclQ����ffitrm�� �
�mTI29
t;fc:I;" � � � �� 3flcIT� Jl<l ,,-<U4i<-FQ 61. When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point
��$1'�190(l)l);�3m'T'U�� of foreign law or of scienc e, or
.. , art, or as to ·1dentity
��im����Qrftl;� 0 f han dwntmg or finger impressions the opinio ns
upon that point of persons
� �-ac!T � i ;;n �� 3fQ1ru � � specially ;killed in such
foreign law science or art
urrcrri. zyt Q� �. � � � :;im � l); �
, or in questions as to
1 en 1.1ty of h'andwrlting or 1.
'd
mger impressions are
qn:m-� � Qrftl; ftl;'lfl' � � � mTI 1952 relevant facts. - this is unde ..•.....•... ...... of
r the
Evidence Act0,ir r-lii<l!c-l<l en) � fl � m
��mr�m���k-trm Q
ftraror, m � � � � m �@�
� � .t t.mnrrAA � � RI. m � c);

a) Nalini Vs State of Tamilnadu/;rt;:r,t; iTifT1T -o.rm � � � � � � mr � � i. en�

� Ql" f<n� � � g;�rn � � �
?f{)ll'tr/1§ (r.;7/ � cni fll�'rfl
� � trR ftreQfl �. � m <MfT ·m � 41
b) Raj Singh v� State I( J 998)1/ n-:;, flir iTifT1T �
1(1998 ) �mm�� ;l g;�rn �- � u1,Hf31<h �
BCI-JAN-21
AIBE-XV HINDI-SET-0

.Jl'Tifl� 1-��m� �!);um----· llflnm;r3fll);ftw�m 3'ffltUr llttftte1fl1<�

·--�3nmi
�cl\T����i
a) �ctlon 42/� 42
a) section 3 of the Advocate Act, 1961/�
b) Section 4S/� 45 �fil.i11, 1961 ifil' um 3
c) Section SO/� 50 b) Section 7 (1) (b) of the Advocate Act,
d) Sectio n ss� 55 1961/3'ftmfiT �<l11', 1951 d!t mu 1 (11 (ifl'l
62 .. Xintentionally and falsely leads B to believ e that c) section 17 of the Advocate Act, 1961/3'ft«@;r
certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to Jffllfil.i11, 1961 � um 11
buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becom es the
prope rty of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on d) Section 18 of the Advocate Act, 1961/JfflrcraiT
the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had n o J@fil<lll, 1961 � � 18
title. He will not be allowed to prove his want of title. 66. ;.<"cording to Sec. 49 of the Advocate Act of 1961 the
• Which Section of the Evidence Act is applicable? /A bar Council of India has power to make
� lft°{ �� 8� t ftl'.\lrn' hctr� rules/��1961®�49��.
��ilil����ffiqfB�� iITT' ifil3�<'I 3IT'fi ��trm � f.!nm � cl\T
-��lltt��m�fi:tv� �i�
�i. itre;Jt� Acilt�ilvf�i 3ftt A� a) qualifications for membership of a Bar Council
for such
��U<Ji�i<llttmt�lr.R<f. m� and the disqualifications
membership/ilR 4\13�1'1 � fl�f<lcil � �
� .:rt;'t �- � � $lf ,Rl�ctilitl � �
� Jftt� f1C:f<le1I �fiw Jlll,•<le1I
-�m <l'i� ��tt-�­ bl the class or cateRorv of persons entitled to be
� �f.!l.i" lfi't m � mu � i1 enrolled as advocates/:mtc@;r3't � l>Q' 1l
.'
;>, Section 92/URT 92 c1111ifc1ie1 � � cq�dl ilil tlir <ll �
b) Section 124/mTI 124 c) the standards of legal education to be observed
bv universities in India and the inspection of
c) Section 115/URT 115
universities for that purpose. /m«f i
d) Section 101/QTU 101
fb�r.i<i1i-idl � � Wlffl <l'i � lftl �
63. The Arbitratio n Act 1996 repeals�
ffl'lf cb..� fb"lrci<lI<'Idi� f.!ltltf!JT��
.11ftfil<l.t1 1996 f.!rt@� �
d) �f the above,'3'Q'(rai � -
a) The Arbitration Act, 1940, � �fil<l.JI,
1940 . 67., fndla, that is Bharat, shall be a�, �fc1iffl«Jt
bl The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) A�t, t?'qi.
1937� 1tilclcrili-1 �- . �Jil') a) Federation of States� <Tfi
:,iftifil<l'1, 1937 b) q_uasi federal�� <Tf i
c) the Foreign Awards (Recognition and c) Union of states�ilillftl'�
Enforcement) Act, 1961. /�fl Cj<f<liFI. (�
d) Unitary state of a special type� ftr.l)"rf i;m;R c1iT
lln� 31Rlfil.i11, 1961
QctilfJ!cl\ Uf �
'E!.). .-ff' of the above,13'Cmifi d 6B. In M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, AIR 19B7 SC1086
64. 'f'arliament may by law esta�lish Administrative (Sri Ram Fertilizers case) the court held that/ "'1t
Tribunals under .•••••.....•....••• of the
Constitution��� ....,.••�� 1!1r. ?ft RFnT iTilT'HHmf Hf1, AlR 1987 SC l086 ( -,ft
1;11� r<ll<llillcl\,tul �lf?lrf 111'{ � f;
. m, l/if!rtf$,iNI � N�;t 'llr;lli71RT�
al �rticle 323B/� 323B fl,;
a) �e of toxic gas the enterprise is strictly
b) Article 323A/�.323 A and absolutely liable to compensate all those
c) Article 233/� 233 who are affected by the accident and such
d) Article 323/� 323 liability Is not subject to any of the exceptions
65. fhe Bar Council of India has to lay down the which operate vis-a-vis the tortlous principle of
standards of professional conduct and etiquette for strict llablllty./5<11.:itcri .)';l �� � �
the Advocates under/il'R cl\15�<'i J/tt1i � $ fiw � � lftl !{ft�� 5iH�lll"'J f;, ;;il'
 AIBE·XV HINDI-SET-0

nment/� 3ft 'llT

�- �
����d;'t���mf<t=rstr'f;I Injurious to enviro
����a<latfl�� �� �$
� �� � � � �t'll<IG / �- ;;rr
Q4\.F(l1f � fc:l"C1' �4il<<li � m � �
��i:m�atm�W<m"��
f,t ·-
sent
��$!�� i1 d) any solid, liquid p re in such concentration as
or tend to be, injurious to
b) In escap may be,
e of a dangerous ·animal the owner is q
strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all environme nt� 9ft o1lr llT ��� i
thos e who are affected by the accident and such
� �iillcli / �. ;m Q�q{Of � �
liab ilit y is not subject to any of the exceptions
�
Which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of t,lj;li:Jil«fi � 'llT � �
strict liability./ tJiff{ciIi:Ji .:,lfcicR" <m � 3<1" 70. tikt{ional Green Tribunal cannot exer cise Its
o/ cfi
Jurisdiction with reference t �� 31'R! {Uf
fflft���<);fi:l,:r���q_tt­ .
���$!��� ���
� � 3tHal4i �:;i)' � llli't<c1l<h·�c,; ¢,
� � ll �s°C' i I 3IR � �$t qi{�
Act,1972/cli-4,,lhr (m-a'f'Or)
�- ;;rr�m*i:JioR�<); �) Wildlife (Protection)
�,1972
3fF<l1<1rf1 � <oT �� i, � 3ft
b) .Scheduled Tribes and Other Tradition al Forest
� <); � � f; I Dwellers (Recol'!nition of Forest Rights} Act,
c) In escape of toxic gas, the enterprise is strictly
2006/�� � Q'!' � �l'rl'c; � �
liable to compensate all those who are affected
by the accident and such liability is subject to any (cr.=r���i�. 2006
· c) ffie Public Liability Insurance Act,
ac@i'.fmr �.
of the exceptions which operate vis:a-vis the
t_ort·lous principle of strict liability� 3<1" 1991/fttJ;,i�<ti 1991
mfrq;)'�mc);n:ro-�tJtRg_tt­ d) both A & ef<W=i't A & 8
�� 31-Hal./l"i �- ;;rr��<);fTilmd;'t 71. � attempt to acquire sensitive informatipn such as
usernames, passwords, and credit card details (and
�*�seri13l'!t����-
3<1" mfr�<);� i � �� � *� sometimes, indirectly,money) by masquerading as a
trustworthy entity in an electronic communication -
is known as/$1'i�l�<li ��'t:!'<fi ��
� i); 3lr41illfl �<of���I
d) A company or a corporation is not a state and $�*�<lR"'c), 3q:ii,Jtcoc1I iORT<im, �
hence not liable for leak ott-o�ic gas affecting the 3tll � i:Jir! fmRor-(� �-?li'Jft, �II'!'��­
health of the people/ {171;";i;Q';ff"l/Tf,;m1rr:re,; �<);�� ��I'm ;:;fl.-ii:filft Wll me);�
�"l/T��'!Jlfr�iW7!f'<S�l/it cm. c);��� ;;mui.: ·
f!HTflrc:r<R"if cll7fr��ilifh:rrcrilift:ltr a) f>fiarmlng/��-
JrM!14'4f{!;t b) Smishing/�r��
69. According to Environmental Protection Act, 1986,
.c) Phishing/rnw-"l/To,rr.:r,_
'e.nyironmental pollutant' means/ Qll\.:HOI � .
d) Didling/$M¼;lf;,q;;m;,��
,rttF.1<111, 1986 <); 3r.jm"{,·Q41<HOI �• � 72. Under Section 82 of the Indian Penal C ode,no· th'1ng
�t; 1s. an offence which Is done by 0
• � ch1.Id und er the age
a) any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in
- •
of.��<m'lli��82��
��
such concentration as may be, or tend to be,
helpful to environment� � tml', � 'll'f
�ITTrl�3di���'J'fV¥q;r��
�;:;f@T
� � ;,l � � f}i<41ae: I �. ;;IT
a) 14 years/14 �­
Q'lncl{OI i); � � � 'll'f �� �
� '7 years/07�
b) only gaseous substance present . in such
concentration as may be, or tend to be, Injurious c) 18 years/18 �
to environment� � <); � / � Jt d) 21 years/21 �
� '1n ���;;IT <31 Qll 1cl{Ot l);- flw
1 73. R. V. Oudlev & Stephen stand
,� � s for the principle
that/31T{ <ft'� .,,.�
ffF.f<liH4i p 'llT p � � "'-'floi�
�-c);�
c) -,PY solid, liquid or gaseous substance present In f:
,such concentration as may be, or tend to be,
BCI-JAN-21
AIBE-XV
a) Killi ng an innoceiit life to save hi� own I� not a
de fen c(' ann necessitv cannot be olraded as a
defence against murder /.wr.:fi � i':TQ� i), �
� � � � � 311rm1m � t 3lh r-c=m
� � Jllm� � f'Q iJl �� .HQ)� e'I�
���
bl �cessitv can be pleaded as a defence agalnM
murder , killi11A an innocent life to save his own
may become inevlt.able� � tR � �
� �c);�3l��;;;r�i.
����i)i���hf���
mcm����i
c) Killing out of mercy is a defence and neces5ity
cannot be pleaded as a defence aRainst murder.
/fttm�l);�������Jttl
c=nft�i��i[.mJi);ft:ro��
��;;ii�
d) Nooe-of the above,1'5'Q'Um � � �
74. ™·utility of Public Interest Litigation/�
� cfil 5Qlilfll<1I i
a) Liberalised locus standi/5c.1flq,r1 � �
b) The proceedings are Non-Adversarial�-�
Qil�cll�
requirements
c) Procedural are
liberalized/Qftl;<11Mcfi ��,,IT q;r 5c.lflq,r1
�;;ii.;r
d) All of the above/3tmm mft -
7S. The petitioner, a profe·ssor of political science who
had done substantial research and deeply interested
in ensuring proper implementation of the
constitutional provisions, challenged the practice
followed by the state of Bihar in repromulgating a
number of ordinances without getting the approval
of the legislature. The court held that the petitioner
a s a member of public has 'sufficient interest' to
maintain a petition under Article 32 - This relates to
the c.ase of/41Rl4iicficff, :t1;:,iJIQ � c)i' �
·,;nm.���c)j-�
clilcnrfl<1o1 � �fil�cil �l);�trlltRqJ\v�
qrlftl��TTJra�.�f1lm�mr�
��am��� 31UTitqr't � f.m=rr
�����:c!r1 ��11ra1ft)i
41Rlcrilcr\i'ff � � � � c)i' � � � 32
l}; � �.,., � m � � ·trlltR mtcliT{'
�1�1lT11r!l�
a) Pa£Pr.1nand Katara Vs Union of India · AIR 1989,
·sc 2039/QU11;.ic; l1imT i1vfT1I' � 3lTTri �
· AIR 1989, SC 2039
HINDI-SET-D
b) D.C. Wadhwa Vs State of Bihar, AIR 1987 SC
579/� . .ft. l1VcllT � � mtr, AIR 1987 SC
579
c) Neeraja Choudhari Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
AIH t984SCl099/� tl't'l.rtt � � ��
�!?I AIR 1984SC1099
d) Chamell Singh V<:. State of UP AIR 1996,
sc1 .os11.:rni:fl f#pr.:ffJf 11.,tft. AIR 1996, SC1051
76. 1/-J)'!(!re a leg al wrong or a leg al injury Is caused to a
person or to a determinate class of persons by
reason of violation of any constitutional or legal right
or any burden is Imposed in co111ravent ion of any
constitutional or legal provis ion or without authority
of law or any such legal wrong or legal injury or
illegal burden Is threatened and such person or
determinate class of persons by reasons of poverty,
helplessness or disability or socially or economically
disadvanta ged position unable to approach the coort
for relief, any member of public can maintain an
application for an appropriate direction, order or
writ in the High Court under Article 226 and in c.ase
any breach of fundamental rights of such persons or
determinate class of persons, in this court under
Article 32 seeking judicial redress for the legal wrong
or legal injury caused to such person or determinate
class of persons. " - Justice Bhagwati in the case of/
�fcf;lfi�'llT��'llT�
�<);3R,iQc1 �qiflVT��<1>1'llT�
���� ���'lll�m?<lil'
<1iRUT 'il'1'c'fT t'<IT � � � 'llT �
�'<IT·� bi�� f:raiy "llT � � �
c);3R;iQo1 ����-����mrc:r
'<IT��m���urcrni:m��
'<IT�. 31,Rt,14r1I_� Pcl<tii-iiJl<1I .QT .fl1'11Qcli qy
� �� tift@-rom c); � cR ��t'<r1 � ��
m;oc)i' ��qi]'� 1Jlc1rn �,.
�c)i' �aft� c)i' � � rn � t.
� 226 <);�� r<ll<ll\'lll A��
�Qrr, 3'$r '<IT� 3ftl � ..4fi),4' cl>�
�!); 5M'illc141 t<1�<1f clicn\'lliT�
�c)i'�i.�32c)i���i
�mra '<IT�� c)i' � � �
� 1fm� 41 C:<1�qj � � �!1ilcll�-·
�������
a) Yeoples Union for Democratic Rights Vs Union of
India�� q;t� �11,biftcli � �
ITT«fm:r
b) Ashok Kumar Pandey Vs State of west
8engal/lf�lmi � QT! i1rfrn �1 iit I I);�
 HINOI-SET-D
BCI-JAN-2l
..- (111)3tlm (iv)� (v) cilf1'.R<1f,
c) S, P, Gu lm. en. 'Jm � (I) Q':mcf (ii) ('!It'''
pta Vs UlliOII of indi�/
rr1v1.. Jltt
. � (vii) 3f'<A<'llqfrt
(v,) "'
�� urase ( 111) 1 n dus. try ('1v )
d) Janat ��� d) (I) HoneS!Y (ii) co uence, fvl) Jud11ment and Ml)'
a Oat Vs H. S. ChowdhMy/ seriousness (v � (.
) Eloa
. ..
�-lffi hi / (I ) ,,,,., ... " , i) � (111)3'<Jm (iv)
� Fell ows P·
77 of fillse
Imp osition of compensatory costs In respect ,(vi)� 3lh- (vii)
Jj3frrnr �(v)
or vexatious c dealt under� 'lfT
latn1s or defences Is
� c:rm � im<1 <); � � 1,1ffi_q3a; � q;r 81. �lnlmum
� number of
Dl(ectors in a Public

� fc:lQctzir JITffi � �lfvrtql<J\lc1:f

company��
a) Section 33. of CPC� � � <nt um r<j_ffr1'1 � � '#;
33� � f/3
b, Section 3SA �f CPC � � � 'Um b) 10/10
3SA c) 12/12
mu 30 dj S/ 5 .
c) Section 30 of CPC � � mt;m a n to another
82_ 11.n associate company, in rel tio
d) Section 35\,f CPC � � � � 35 tt�W•ft �. � �
company, meansflr<7i
�l);mitcnff�nrctri
7S.. Which provision under the Code of Civil Procedure
deals with substituted service of summons upon the t the comp any has a
defen dantJ;n,1fN, � � $ � � m � a ·company in which tha o
significant influence , but whic•h is a subsidiary
�offia1� CR�c1:f��t company of the. com pany having such influence
a y/Qi1i �
� .t and includes a Joint venture comp n
a) er.s R.19A/O.S R.19A � � � � lfiT Jlt,c-4C(in QlTT?f �
b) 0.5 R.19/0.S R.19
c) 0.5 R.20/O.5 R.20
t. � ��cir'(1?1) � � i. �
dl o.g R.21/0.5 R.21 °QmQ':i:rrn�illtt����
79, Among other things, the Function of Bar council of �� M i
India Includes laying down standards of professional b) a company in which that other company has a
conduct and etiquette for advocates. - Under which significant influence,' but which is not a subsidiary
section of theAdvocatesAct/� i!Tffii); 3fiimJT, iffi company of the company h'aving such influence
and Includes a Joint venture company��
i:nl3�i-1 3fi'tf; � cfTT 4il�•,IOIIcfJ A' 3ffmra;y3U i);
� inm 3ITTW7T ��� 1ITcii1\' Qnfm;ri. �� ���l"Q-q; 11e,c-<14.al mi<:r

� � 31Rl�q11 � fijqJ um c); � t �i.���-�c);-���cnt

al Section 7/1Jm7 - ���tlft{�ll<li�3-cm

b) Section 8/Vm 8 ��rrfmrt

c) a company in which that other company has a
c) Section /
9 Qm 9
significant influence, but which Is not a subsidiary
d) Section 6/Qm 6 company of the company having such influence
80. Accordinl7. to Justice A
' bbot Parry' what are the and do,s not Include a Joint venture
"Seven Lamps of Advocacy"./.-414� 1..iilk tl"ft '$ companyf"'1i��� 3fNJ��
�-,,��ffl<'f�"Q'qft � #1('.c-<lq;_a\ VWJ'lf � t � � � ��
a) (I) Honesty (II ) Courage (iii) professionalism (iv) �����
��tlft{
Wit (v) Eloquence. /vi) Jud11ment and (vii)
Fellowship./ (I) �'11ii!C:lfl (ii)� (Ill)
�������i
d) a company In which that other co, .
mpa ny has fuII
�icJ«iRl<l>rll (iv) ijft" (v) cJ11hir11, (vi)� 3ltt shares, and is a subsidia ry comp
any of the
(vii) ;t�r1,q_fR company having such Influenc
e and Includes a
Joint v enture companyfmli �
bl (i) Honesty (11) Courage (Iii) Industry (Iv) Wit (v) _ ��
Eloauence. (vi) Jud2ment and (vii) Fellowship./ �
{I) $#llo1c;1fl (ii)� {iii)3"0m (Iv)� (v)
c11fh1111, (vi)� 3/tT (vii)�
"_'i4t l1itlift ��������
�c);q_-ot��,.�$1l��Q'fflq

�3-.mcfil«ftq�* ·.
c) (I) influence (ii) Courage (iii) Industry (Iv) Wit (v)
Eloquence, (vi) Judgment and (vii} Fellowship./
 BCI-JAN-21 AIBE-XV HINDI-SET-0
structure capital company or
83. Section 66A of Informati on Technolo Rv Act was held a) Issued by any Jnfra
unconstitutlonal In the case of� Q'tm� Infrastructure capital fund or public sector
b
J<Rll';\lM iflt � 66 A i1>°l fbm � � � company or scheduled ank on or after the 1st
kl< �
day or June, 2005;� � $11il�•
���- � c:rr $rllilf'iff.ll � � c:rr �
a) Justice IC. S. Puita swamv Vs Union of
lndia/;jifRf! l);.�. q�U-OIJ(I irnm 3mnm7 �ci;q.:ftmq�tt.1;mr,�,2oosc);�
b) MP Sharma Vs Satish Chandra�. tft. �� <1J3"fl$���:rcTT�;
ay fit is
b) in respect of which no p ment and bene
iliim
�r�
received or receivable before maturity or
c) Shreya Singha! Vs Union of lndia/�ffitn;r redemption from infrastructure capltill. compa y
n
or infrastructu re capita l fund or public sector
�IJTIBmf
d) <.aRan Harsh Sharma Vs the State of company or scheduled bank/� ffl ;#
Maharashtra� pt �rffl ilc'Jm � UiNJ - < � cj;Q;ft cTT $rllil�<kl< �
$Uil�<HI
84. A Teacher is not a workman within the purvi ew of q;sm� ��m���a
Industrial Disputes Act, held in the case of/f!q; q�Qckln• c:rr ���emf :iprc,Tif m "<'fl1f
fmrcl;, Jtt<ilfJlq; � JfftQ4Jj c)i 00-� Clim mr.��i, https://www.xamstudy.com
mmro"'"°''���, w����11m cl '\IJhich the Central Government may, by
a) The Workmen Vs GreavesCotton & Co. Ltd. & notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this
Ors�or.:im�<li'rZil' �� �f.ti�s-"Qci behalf. /;;fr�� flr<m, m<1iTft � ;#
� �ij_ilc-11 .:m� (1;(" ��
bl John Joseph Khokar Vs Bhadange B. S. & ors/;;rri!' d) f'J,I en "the above,'31mm m1t
��.r.:l"m�ift.Qlf.�� 87, Provisions relating to GST are inserted in the
c) A Sundarambal Vs Government of Constitution by/GST � .tiiiRra
Qftl1't � 1t
Goa/��Miliifi<'f .r.:l"l7f 1ffiJT t!r<m � � cfi't mt i
d) Dinesh Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Bihar�T a) TheConstitution (one hundred and first) Act
2016� (�qq:l't t:?<1i c!T) � 2016
�rm�� ilc'Jm��
.. b). � Constitution (one hundred and second) Act
85. According to Factories Act/<lii<&litI $ 2016� IV<1> � en clT) � 2016
� c) TheConstitution (eighty fourth) Act
a) "child" means a person who has not completed 2016� � <lT) .ifftf.hl,R"2016
his fifteenth year of age;/ "�" c1iT mt
<lit� d) The Constitution (seventy seven) Act
��3fQc'ft'�ridlt3!Tlj��� 2 � (�<IT)� 2016
�t: 88. �its by indigent persons is dealt under/.lfm
b) "liHl'fd" means a person who has not completed a:il$41 IITTT �• f;\J.c-ifi:lnllc1 � c); cff<1"
t
his fourteenth year of age/"ilt:U" lJiT 3ft dlt
��t
� � � 3fQc'ft' � ridlt 3l1lj � �
a) Order 44 of C.P.C�-afs);c:rr � (� )
��i- - lf11'Qm44
cl ...child" means a person who has �ot comple ted
his eighteenth year of age/"� t1iT rt tdlt b) Orcfer 33 ofC.P.C�offmrr�(�)
Qc1i � � 3ft1.fl' � ri dlt 3!T'j � 4\'tQm 33
WT��� c) Order 5S of C.P.C�offmrr � (�)
d) "child " means a person who has not com pleted if\'J'�ss
his shcteenth year of age/"�' lJiT � i dlt (.'<1i" d) Order 22 of C.P.C�offmrr
� (�)
� � 3ftl'ifl #IHt,cfl Zllt if:r 3l1lj � � � lf11'� 22
�i 89" Res geStae, Relevancy of
facts forming part of same
86. Accordl nl( to I ncome Tax Act "zero coupon bond" transaction Is dealt under
/Res gestae, � �-�
means a bond /Jmlllil 31�f.l•M $ � "llJrl c1iT � � � <"urr
dlt qi'ff P,q;c-1, � �
��;,;r�ffl1iRi'itit:r f.lqel41;;n'nr�
 BCI-JAN-
21 AIBE-XV HINDI-SET-0 =-
a) Sectio
n 6 of the Evidence Act/ID«� �ffl1m � Jf'Clrt � ili m� � � i � q;r
��6 �
b) Sectio n c) Inheritance of the self-acquired agricultural land
17 of the Evidence Act/ffl� Jr�
� � c1:t
l#;'t � 17 of her deceased husband/� �­
c) Se ction � � ijflr � 3cHIRllril<
18 of Ihe Evidence Act/fflR �
3ft
��18 d) All of the above� �
d) Section 94. !ectlon 25 of the Hindu Marriaie Act Provides
20 of the Evidence Act/mR .Nftlf.l<111
for�� <!°Jf cftt
JJRlf;) um
25 CJ;T Q'R1\mf i-
�20 /il'i:m c1:t �
90· 'l"he defin
ition of 'money' under GST law does not a) Custody of the Children
inclu der-;nC!fll'I <1>"f<lC, � "�" � �
$ ;:t � b) P-1"manent alimony and maintenance�
q��t �<ti114
-� ffi'1' 31R
� letter of Credi� Jl'l'q; � - c) Maintenance Pendente lite/Hii«lllc7 Pendente
b) Currency held for numismatic valuePJW � � lite
� JII41Qc1 "ffe d) Division of matrimonial propertyfit<Jl�cri �
<61'�
c) Pay order/ *� 9S.. l(°Hindu wife had been living with he r children and
d) J.c.aveler cheque�mli
91. -tl'nder Article 279A GST Counci all the children had been brought up by her without
l is constituted any assistance and help from th e hus band many
by/� 279A i);� ;,ft(!fl� ��ml vears. The wife was entitled to separate residence
���i and maintenance under/f[lfi�Q'a't �oRml);
a) Prime Minister and his Council of Minlsters,'tltl'r.'T ����Jttl��imlfl1il'TIITIIT?f�
7m 3'rr� Ji�Qfhc: SJ<U'r����-_Jrtmqfi!t$��
b) Res�ctive Governors of the State/� �fJ4c11 � <fit <°t't �- Q(;ft � � J«iT2T firora
c);
llRH�H <i.r4QIi-1 ltt<<&;Allclcftt�i
'c) The Presldentj,(l�Qfi!I a). �ctlon 18 (2) (f) of Hindu Adoptions and
d) A collective body of Union and States/ml 3ftt Maintenance Act/� Gt'fc1i 3ftl HlH<lll<l
�<1il'�l�cri� �f.l411 � � 18 (2) (f)
b) Section 18 (2) Cd) of Hindu Adoptions and
92. . �e definition of Contract is defined under/lr.jiiv
Maintenance Act� � 3ftl -<<lH<lll<l
<1:t Qfhmu Qf\>t1�c1 41'!' 111ft i
31RJf.?1<1A cflt 'Um 18 (2) (d
a) Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act. /� )
c) Section 18 12) (a) of Hindu Ado
� 3t�f.hM 4lr ptions and
um
2 (a) ;l Maintenance Act� �
� Hi<till<l
.l2J _5ection 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act. /�
lfftlf.l41!' � t1RT 18 (2) (a
)
� .;t�f.l<111 $tum2 (h)1f d) Section 18 (2) Ii!) o Hin
f du Adoptions and
c) Secti on 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act. /� Maintenance Act�
Gt'fc1i � <Ul<till<l
� 3t�f.l<M J1t um � c1\'t um
2 (di ;l 13 (2J 18>
d) Section 2(g) of the Indian Contract Act. /� 96.. Requisites of a valid ado
ption·. n� adoption shall be
valid unless- (I) the erso
3r-jift1lt�f.l<11111lt um2 (gJ 1t n n has_ the capacity,
and also the right, t� ta k e
i��c;;i•
�pt g (11) the person
ion;
93. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act (HSAA)2005
provides for women:�3n<1ftltn1< (�qfl1r.J
)
giving In adoption has th
person adopted is capab� �i:c
� t y to do so; (iii) the
ein
adoption·' and (iv) the a g ta k en in_
Jffl1fi½411' (HSAA)2005 �lit i); � � � dOption Is ma de
compliance with the othe In
t: r condition s mentione
this Chapter. - mentione d in
a) coparcenary rights at par with men;/�� d underArcli
fflU � ��
3r.jml: � �� � � 1'TNJ $
a,;Mcii I({ lfftnm: � � � nifi.
. b! 'Inheritance rights In agricultural land fro (I)���,,,,__ "'"41ff'I��

parents at par with her brothers;/.MQ.\

m her
mnr.ftrc:rr
� 3ft (Ii) *; ���
��

� ��
�
ffirc=fr,�cftt
mfnTt(lll)�fc:tllr
������;
BCI-JAN-21 HINDI-SET-D
AIBE-XV
e ar � 00
3ltt (Iv) � 3n.lITTf � 3�fil1<1 � �f"1 l); a) ..-document signed by th P ties;
31cjQliilii A��mnt;1 -��� · �mrrnr� c:-@1� �
r.mn�i b) an exchange of let ters,
telex, telegrams or other
nica tion which provide a
a) Section 6 of Hindu Adop tions and Miilntenan
ce means of telecommu
$�q:"f.lc/i ��
Act��� <l<l<&IQ � ��rm 6 record of the agreement;/
b)_,...81fction 8 of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance 'ftml $ tA, �. �i;flm" 'll'1 e;_nhm <);'
Act�� �<tlH&IU �f.:lu;i, � tnu 8 31rlf � � _mzyr.� ;;il fl't'7ffil c,,l
c) Section 12 of H_lndu Adoptions and Maintenance
����
Act��� {Ul{t!IIQ � <f?t � 12 of c laim and defence
c) an exchange of statements
d) Section 10 of Hindu Adopt ons and Maintenance e
In which the existence of th agreement is
i
A� Jn< HiH:&IU � <f?t � 10 alleged by one party and not denied by the
97. M"cording to the Muslim women(protectl on of right other.� 3ltt .rmzJ <);' �� 11i1i �­
son marriage) act, 2019, any pronouncement of ,;re-r.:r � ff't¢� <1iT � 11i1i Q'ffl' 00
talaq as defined under the Act by a Muslim husband
upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or ���t;3l'R"�OO��
in electronic form or in any other manner fc1im � i I
whatsoever, shall be/ the Muslim women( protectlon
d) All,dtthe above��� 3fl"
of right son marriage) act, 2019 $ �. � n
100. W�er of right to object deviance from arbitratio
�mr�Qr.ft'��c);�� 'agreement is mentioned under --- of the
.t-
�m!'���$�'ilil 3t.ill·M, ��� �ti�
.....
Arbitration and Conciliation Act,'Jrt.,Zlfllictl :ff11"$i
� � m $�<k;;lf.:I4i "''tf if� 3r.=lJ � � �<ffqfclmrrr��cfftW:<1if�
� t � � m err �Jtn��;.fft�'aRT$'�
�idmrci;T���t - �.rm?;:
bl Cognizable���� a) Section 7/1/:lm 7
c) compoundable/.fiq,-,j.{IQ b) Section 4/'URT 4
d) All of the above,/3'Qmfi ll'� c) Section 20/'tlm 20
98. J:Re UNCITRAL Model Law and Rules do not become d) �n 22/'URT 22
part of the Arbitration Act so as to become an aid to
construe the provisions of the Act. - held in the case
of/UNOTRAL � tffl'¥ Jltt � 3=1't�
31ftf.:lll'1 �� ift,'ti, � ��
� ijft mi�cPJi� � f�"Q"(!"cfl .fl(.Illc1I ilil' � I
irar����a-nfl
a) Union of India Vs East Coast Boat Builders and
Engineers Ltd., j�Q.-l Jl'tq; � � �
�-fn1k � � $;,ft�ll� fc:l�es
b) Union of lndia\is M.C. MehtaJl@lll<i 3ITlfi �
--� inr:�. �
c) Tata Press Ltd Vs Union of lndia/llcT � fc:1!1its
�3mnm:r
d) Union of India vs Indian change Chrome
ltd� m����m
�11its
a(. According to Secti on 7(4) of th e Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, an arbitration agreement Is In
writing if It is contained in-/JlUTf
��
iffl UTtT 7(4) $ Jr,Jlm'. iraT �Ml�Ji t."l1i �
� � �� l1l- fi:fftlm �