Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SIE-Chapter-3-Summary (1)
SIE-Chapter-3-Summary (1)
A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK
DIMENSION A: Creating inclusive cultures (Section A.1. Building community, and Section A.2. Establishing
inclusive values)
This dimension creates a secure, accepting, collaborating, and stimulating community, in which everyone is
valued as the foundation for the highest achievements of all.
It develops shared inclusive values that are conveyed to all new staff, students, governors, and
parents/carers.
The principles and values, in inclusive school cultures, guide decisions about policies and moment to moment
practice in classrooms, so that school development becomes a continuous process.
DIMENSION B Producing inclusive policies
Section B.1 Developing the school for all
Section B.2 Organizing support for diversity
This dimension makes sure that inclusion permeates all school plans. Policies encourage the participation of
students and staff from the moment they join the school, reach out to all students in the locality, and minimize
exclusionary pressures. All policies involve clear strategies for change. Support is considered to be all activities
which increase the capacity of a school to respond to student diversity. All forms of support are developed
according to inclusive principles and are brought together within a single framework.
Stakeholders are those who are invested in the welfare and success of a school and its students
These are the teachers, administrators, school staff, officials and other workers, the parents and their
families, the community, and the government.
They may also be collective entities like local businesses, advocacy groups, the media, sociocultural
institutions, and other organizations that may be directly or indirectly involved in education.
Stakeholders are important because they play a major role in connecting what is being taught in a school to its
surrounding community.
The following are some steps stakeholders can take to create inclusive cultures:
Set the parameters for inclusion; Build key people; And identify and eradicate barriers.
Common Barriers
Attitudes, values systems, misconceptions, and societal norms; Physical barriers; Curriculum;
Lack of teacher training and low teacher efficacy; Poor language and communication; Lack of
funding; Lack of policies; Organization of educational systems; And too much focus on
performance-based standards
Special Education vs. Mainstreaming vs. Inclusive Education
The following is a list of other possible steps that educators can take to facilitate the much-needed societal shift and
inform policy:
Involve other sectors of society; Collaborate; Recognize the shift in roles of the teachers; and Include
transitions in planning
A move that would greatly help in informing policy would be to examine different aspects of the school and the delivery of
its services. Specifically, schools may look at the following:
Student admissions; Accessibility to utilities and facilities; Supports available to students, parents, and school
personnel; Learner accommodations; Exclusionary or discriminatory incidents; Number of bullying cases; and Faculty
and staff promotions
A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK
In 2002, Booth and Ainscow came up with an Index for Inclusion,
It aims to direct educational institutions toward developing their own next steps and action plans if they want to restructure into becoming more
inclusive.
It takes on the social model of disability as its starting point, builds on good practice, and then organizes the index work around a cycle of
activities which guide schools through stages of preparation, investigation, development, and review” (UNESCO 2005:30).
A three-dimensional framework was created – creating inclusive cultures, evolving inclusive practices, and producing inclusive policies
– are interconnected and "chosen to direct thinking about school change” (2002:7). (See Figure 3.1).
Considered the backbone of the framework is the laying down and establishing of an inclusive culture.
Without this at the foundation, it will be quite difficult to get people to shift policies and practices.
A non – supportive culture would most likely result in resistance from the school’s direct stakeholders.
These three dimensions also branch out into sections to further guide schools into implementing more direct steps toward this paradigm
shift.
Figure 3.1. Three dimensions of the Index (Booth and Ainscow 2002:7).
This dimension creates a secure, accepting, collaborating, and stimulating community, in which everyone is valued as the foundation for the
highest achievements of all. It develops shared inclusive values that are conveyed to all new staff, students, governors, and parents/carers.
The principles and values, in inclusive school cultures, guide decisions about policies and moment to moment practice in classrooms, so
that school development becomes a continuous process.
This dimension makes sure that inclusion permeates all school plans. Policies encourage the participation of students and staff from the
moment they join the school, reach out to all students in the locality, and minimize exclusionary pressures. All policies involve clear
strategies for change. Support is considered to be all activities which increase the capacity of a school to respond to student diversity. All
forms of support are developed according to inclusive principles and are brought together within a single framework.
Attitudes, values systems, misconceptions, and societal norms – can lead to prejudices and/or actual resistance to implement inclusive
practices (UNESCO 2005).
Physical barriers – the lack of building, facility, transportation, or road accessibility are types of physical barriers that can literally affect one’s
mobility.
Curriculum – a rigid one size fits all curriculum does not allow room for individual differences can significantly stunt one’s learning and
opportunity for growth.
Lack of teacher training and low teacher efficacy – whether training in teaching strategies, using curriculum frameworks, or behavior and
classroom management, lack of training as well as low confidence in one’s own skills can directly affect how inclusive practices are
implemented.
Poor language and communication – language barriers may also directly have implications on how well inclusive practices are implemented.
Lack of funding – enough funding can allow for training more teachers as well as coming up with more appropriate programs, instructional
materials, or facilities; lack of funds can be limiting and debilitating to schools.
Lack of policies – policies have the ability to unify beliefs and mobilize resources; unfortunately, lack of it can become a convenient justification
for inaction.
Organization of educational systems – centralized systems may have some type of detachment in terms of implementing policies and seeing
the reality of how such policies are affecting learners and other stakeholders.
Too much focus on performance-based standards – schools have also reportedly refused inclusion because of fear that the presence of
learners with additional needs will pull down their rankings in standardized tests.
Part of what needs to occur when creating cultures is to also determine distinctions among frameworks and practices.
Most important in this scenario is to understand how different special education, mainstreaming, and inclusive education are from each other.
In the previous chapter, we discussed how special education is often regarded as segregated and exclusive.
It has to be noted, however, that this perception is entirely due to its nature of addressing cases in a highly individualized way.
This is not to mean that special education is an environment that violates human rights.
Because special education assesses, instructs, and evaluates students individually and intentionally, this type of educational setting is
beneficial to those with very unique needs as well.
Mainstreaming shares more similarities with inclusion than with special education. Both look at integrating the child with additional needs into
a general education setting.
There are, however, nuances between the two as well (see Table 3.1).
In architecture, universal designs refer to structures that were made in such a way that they can be used by customers or clients with a wide
range of needs (Dukes & Lamar-Dukes 2009 as cited in Salend 2011). Such designs ensure accessibility for all. For example, an architect
designs a commercial complex where ramps, elevators, escalators, handrails, wide doorways and sidewalks, and signs embossed in Braille
abound. It is a very user-friendly building. Obviously, the designer imagined that some customers might walk into the complex in wheelchairs or
white canes. The architect does not know if or when it's going to happen, but he anticipated it and incorporated it into his design anyway.
Such is the mechanics of a Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach to instruction. UDL refers to the design of instructional materials and
activities to make the content information accessible to all children (Rose & Meyer 2006 as cited Turnbull et al. 2013). It is best used in a
general education classroom where learners are different. Through the provision of delivering content and allowing student to construct learning
in more than one way, UDL ensures that all students learn genuinely.
There are three elements to UDL:
Multiple means of representation
Multiple means of action and expression
Multiple means of engagement
In UDL, teachers are supposed to present information and materials in many different ways, taking into consideration that some students may
have not fully absorbed the lesson the first time it was presented. The concept of multiple means of representation is meant to ensure that all
students are able to access and understand learning materials. After this, teachers allow students to express what they learned in various
ways, and finally, t h e teacher u s e s different techniques to reinforce learning at the students’ optimal levels. The principles of UDL, which
sometimes overlap are presented below with examples ( see Table 3.2).
Differentiated Instruction
According to Tomlinson (2010), differentiated (or differentiating) instruction is a teacher's response to students' varying needs, interests, and
learning styles. "It refers to a systematic approach to planning curriculum and instruction for academically diverse learners. It is a way of
thinking about the classroom with the dual goals of honoring each student’s learning needs and maximizing student’s learning capacity." When
teachers differentiate instruction, they use a variety of teaching and learning strategies that are necessary to meet the diverse needs of students
in any class (Friend & Bursuck 2009).
Why Differentiate Instruction?
All learners are unique and have varying interests, talents, strengths, as well as, needs. Hence, it is essential that teaching and learning
experiences reflect this diversity. To ensure engaged, successful, and flourishing learners, teaching and learning experiences need to be
designed in a way that provide opportunities for students to learn and demonstrate their understanding in varied ways. Thus, Differentiating
Instruction (DI) helps ensure that learners are engaged in respectful tasks and provide diverse means of learning that reflect their strengths
and address their needs simultaneously.
How instruction is differentiated?
Bender 2022 (as cited by Gentry et al., 2013) identified of the curriculum that can be differentiated: (1) content, (2) process, (3) product,
and (4) learning environment in response to the student’s characteristics: interests, readiness, and learning profile. As an overview,
differentiation is achieved by providing materials and tasks:
At varied levels of difficulty;
With varying levels of instructional support;
By using multiple grouping arrangement;
That involve student choice; and
Use varied evaluation strategies.
As teachers, you must know your curriculum. You are suggested to revisit or identify which are non-negotiable and negotiable learning
objectives and tasks. You are also expected to know your student’s interests, readiness level (based on diagnostic data), and learning
styles/profile (strengths and needs). You may create a class profile to provide an overview of the class’s characteristics and needs. Next,
you may have to identify and plan what and how to differentiate your material. The goal is to start small and make simple steps toward
differentiating instruction. Table 3.3 provides a guide on how to effectively differentiate in the classroom.