Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Scheduling and Planning
2. Scheduling and Planning
2. Scheduling and Planning
Maintenance Planning and scheduling of work orders is the hub of a well-functioning maintenance
organization. In order for maintenance planning and scheduling to work many other systems need
to work well. Most importantly equipment inspections through preventive maintenance, technical
database such as bill of materials, work order history, and standard job plans. Maintenance spare
part stores have to function well, see Figure 2-1.
Figure 2-1: The various arms involved in Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
1
But when the objective is define and the problem studied on a combined basis, it is possible to
develop a unified maintenance plan that will give the best overall results.
Where a policy of planned replacement is practised, the planning is mainly of a financial nature –
ensuring money is available for the purchase of new equipment, balancing depreciation costs
against tax allowances, negotiating the sale, or trade-in, of old equipment at the most favourable
price. But by the far, the greater part of planned maintenance is concerned with the organisation
of the engineering aspect of maintenance and its relationship to production.
This maintenance may be affected in different ways; when the facility is running, when it has
stopped, before it breaks down, after it breaks down, it can be planned or it can be done as and
when the need arises, without any prior planning.
2.1.1 Fundamentals of Planned Maintenance
The fundamental basis of any planned maintenance system is deciding in advance:
1. The individual items of plant and equipment to be maintained,
2. The form, method and details of how each item is to be maintained,
3. The tools, replacement, spares, tradesmen and time that will be required to carry out this
maintenance,
4. The frequency at which these maintenance operations must be carried out,
5. The method of administering the system,
6. The method of analysing the results.
In order to express these basic essentials in a way that will form the structure of a practical system,
there must be;
1. A schedule of all the plant and equipment to be maintained,
2. A complete schedule of all the individual tasks that must be carried out on each item of
plant,
3. A program of event indicating when each task must be carried out,
4. A method of ensuring that the work listed in the programme is carried out,
5. A method of recording the results and assessing the effectiveness of the programme.
Even the simplest of planned maintenance schemes must be controlled, and certain facts need to
be readily available to the person in control if this is to be effective. As the human memory cannot
retain more than a very limited amount of information with any guarantee of accuracy, and as
scribbling of notes on odd scraps of paper, which are often lost, is equally unreliable, a more
organised system of documentation is essential.
There are many basic documentation systems available that have been designed specifically for
the control and support of the planned maintenance schemes. These are all capable of being tailored
to suit the individual requirements of any company or organisation. Frequently, these basic systems
are elaborated to provide information on costs, man hour, repair time, materials and replacements
used or any other relevant data that are considered helpful. But any system that is installed should
be easy to operate, involve the maintenance staff in the minimum of paper handling and recording
but must be capable of indicating clearly:
• What is to be maintained?
• How it is to be maintained?
• When it is to be maintained?
2
• Effectiveness of the maintenance activities.
The initial organisation and subsequent operation of any planned maintenance system will involve
time, money and usually a considerable amount of hard work. For a company to justify this
investment there must be substantial benefits. Therefore, any company considering the
introduction of planned maintenance will of necessity want to know
• Can it be successfully applied to our particular case?
• What benefits will result?
Planned maintenance can be successfully applied to all types of industry but its ultimate effects
and benefits will differ. They depend upon the industry, the local conditions, the depth and scope,
and form of application.
Planned maintenance is not the fundamental solution for every maintenance problem. It will not
compensate for poor workmanship, lack of tools, bad design or mal-operation of machinery by the
personnel, nor will it convert worn out obsolete equipment into modern, high efficient units.
However, the mere fact that maintenance is being considered and controlled in a systematic,
constructive manner must lead to some positive benefits which are the direct result of this planning.
The essence of company planning is the optimisation of its resources – labour, money, materials
and machinery. Planned maintenance can contribute to this objective as follows:
a) Improved budgetary control – realistic budget can be formulated and subsequently
controlled,
b) Improved stock control of spares – realistic quantities of spare parts are stocked and
ordered,
c) Provision of information upon which management can make realistic forecasts and
decisions,
d) Focusing attention on frequently occurring jobs and types of defects, and the type,
frequency and cost of individual repairs.
To provide these extra facilities, additional documentation and tabulation, over and above that
normally required for basic planning, will be necessary. The nature if this paper work will depend
upon individual circumstances and the benefits in view. Although the practical benefits may be
readily recognised, the financial advantages may be less obvious, and also difficult to assess until
the scheme has been running for some time.
Initially, the maintenance costs may rise as extra work is involved to catch up with the backlog, to
overcome the ravages of past neglect and to bring the equipment to the required operational
standard. When this initial work is completed and the scheme is functioning normally, the costs
will fall but there is no guarantee that they will fall below those prior to the commencement of the
scheme. The true measure is reflected only in the ultimate overall cost of the product.
Even this ultimate cost may require careful scrutiny and adjustment as various factors affecting
production costs – higher level of production, new machines, increased labour and materials costs
and modifications in product design and specification – may have occurred in the meantime.
2.2 Scheduling
3
Maintenance scheduling is the process by which jobs are matched with resources and sequenced
to be executed at certain points in time. A reliable schedule must take into consideration of the
following:
1. A job priority ranking that reflects the urgency and the criticality of the job
2. Whether all the materials needed for the work order are in the plant (if not, the work order
should not be scheduled)pri
3. The production master schedule and close coordination with operation
4. Realistic estimates and what is likely to happen rather than what the scheduler desires
5. Flexibility in the schedule (the scheduler must realise that flexibility is needed, especially
in maintenance; the schedule is often revised and updated)
The maintenance can be prepared at three levels, depending on the horizon of the schedule:
1. The long-range master schedule, covering a period of three months to 1 year,
2. The weekly schedule covering one week, and
3. The daily schedule covering the work to be completed each day
The long-range schedule is based on existing work orders, including blanket work orders,
backlogs, preventive maintenance and anticipated emergency maintenance. It should balance long-
term demand for maintenance work with available resources. Based on long-term schedule,
requirements for spare parts and materials could be identified and ordered in advance. The long-
range schedule is usually subject to revisions and updating to reflect changes in plans and realised
maintenance work.
The weekly maintenance schedule is generated from the long-range schedule and takes into
account current operations schedules and economic considerations. The weekly schedule should
allow for about 10% to 15% of the workforce to be available for emergency work. The planner
should provide the schedule for the current week and the following one, taking into consideration
the available backlog. The work orders that are scheduled for the current week are sequenced based
on priority. Critical path analysis and integer programming are techniques that can be used to
generate a schedule. In most small- and medium-sized companies, scheduling is performed based
on heuristic (a commonsense rule (or set of rules) intended to increase the probability of solving
some problem) rules and experiences.
The daily schedule is generated from the weekly schedule and is usually prepared a day before.
This schedule is usually interrupted to perform emergency maintenance. The established priorities
are used to schedule the jobs. In some organisations, the schedule is handed to the area supervisors,
who assign the work according to the established priorities.
2.2.1 Elements of Sound Scheduling
Planning the maintenance work is a prerequisite for sound scheduling. In all types of maintenance
work, the following are necessary requirement for effective scheduling:
1. Written work orders that are derived from a well-conceived planning process. The work
orders should explain precisely the work to be done, the methods to be followed, the crafts
needed, spare parts needed and priority.
2. Time standards that are based on work measurement techniques
3. Information about craft availability for each shift
4. Stocks of spare parts and information on restocking
4
5. Information on the availability of special equipment and tools necessary for maintenance
work
6. Access to the plant production schedule and knowledge about when facilities will be
available for service without interrupting the production schedule
7. Well-defined priorities for the maintenance work. These priorities must be developed
through close coordination between maintenance and production
8. Information about jobs that are already scheduled and are behind schedule (backlog)
The scheduling procedure should include the following steps as outlined
1. Sort backlog work order by crafts
2. Arrange orders by priority
3. Compile a list of complete and carryover jobs
4. Consider job duration, location, travel distance, and possibility of combining jobs in the
same area
5. Schedule multi-craft jobs to start at the beginning of every shift
6. Issue a daily schedule (except for project and construction work)
7. Authorise a supervisor to make work assignments (perform dispatching)
These elements provide the scheduler with the requirements and the procedures for developing a
maintenance schedule.
For large jobs or maintenance projects, especially shutdown maintenance jobs, the scheduler can
use available quantitative techniques for generating the schedule and balancing manpower
requirements. These techniques include the critical path method (CPM), program evaluation and
review technique, integer programming and stochastic programming.
5
2 Urgent Work should start within 24 Work that is likely to have an impact
hours on safety, environment, quality or will
shut down the operation
3 Normal Work should start within 48 Work that is likely to impact
hours production within a week
4 Schedule As scheduled Preventive maintenance and routine;
all programmed work
5 Postponable Work should start when Work does not have an immediate
resources are available or at impact on safety, health, environment
shutdown or production operations
The ultimate objectives of scheduling is to construct a time chart showing the start and finish time
for each job (activity), the interdependencies among jobs, and the critical jobs that require special
attention and effective monitoring.
In the past, the scheduling of jobs in a project was based on heuristic techniques and the first known
scheduling tool was the Gantt Chart developed by Henry Gantt during World War II. This is a
bar chart that specifies the start and finish time for each activity on a horizontal time scale. Its
principal disadvantage is that it does not show interdependencies among different jobs. The Gantt
chart can be modified to show interdependencies by noting milestones on each job timeline. The
milestones indicated the key time periods in the duration of each job. Obvious milestones for any
job are the starting time for the job and the required completion point. Other important milestones
are significant points within a job, such as the point at which the start of the other jobs is possible.
Project planning and scheduling techniques have evolved over time and two analytical techniques
are widely used for planning and scheduling. These are the critical path method (CPM) and the
project evaluation and review technique (PERT).
6
A sample of a work order is shown in Figure 2-2. In addition to data taken from the work request,
the work order must show the approval signature of the person approving the order. A typical daily
schedule sheet is shown in Figure 2-3. A typical weekly schedule is shown in Figure 2-4.
Scheduling of work is done on a priority basis. Occasionally, it is necessary to generate an
emergency work order, Figure 2-5
7
Figure 2-3: Typical Schedule Sheet
8
Figure 2-4: Sample Mechanical Area Work Schedule
9
Figure 2-5: Typical Emergency Repair Order
Since maintenance expenditures are significant, then it is important that they receive a lot of
attention during the budgeting process from those that put the budget together. An oversight or
miscalculation in an area that consumes as much of the total budget as does maintenance could
have a devastating effect on an organization. Since the, so to speak, is focused on the maintenance
budget, then adequate preparation should be made so as to prepare an accurate budget for the
organisation.
11
price increase? How about a labour rate or benefit increase? These are just a few of the
many assumptions that you would probably make during the building of the budget. And
if you’re like me remembering something for more than a month is a real
challenge. Record your assumptions somewhere, on paper or in the computer. You may
be required to submit some of the more significant ones with the budget but take the time
to also record the less significant ones for your own files.
Documenting your assumptions is important. They can help you answer questions at a
later time that refer to the basis of the numbers in your budget. If conditions change and
you are forced to revisit your budget, you will have a resource that will refresh your
memory about the original budget. Assumptions should not hurt you. Remember they
represent your best estimate about an uncertain future.
3. Explain the nature of maintenance costs – As I’ve already established, maintenance costs
are a significant portion of the budget. Maintenance costs can occur in significant amounts
(engine overhauls) and at unpredictable times (unscheduled removals). Both are difficult
traits to grasp for the person in executive management that has to manage the cash flow of
an organization. Normally this person is in accounting or finance and is typically
conservative. This means the person doesn’t like big surprises, which is
understandable. Which would you rather manage a cash flow that is unpredictable and has
peaks and valleys or one that is constant and predictable? Of course it would be the
latter. (Explains somewhat why guaranteed maintenance programs have become more
popular.)
You can help that person who is unfamiliar with the behaviour of maintenance costs by
taking the time to explain the nature of these costs. Remember, often their point of
reference is auto maintenance. You may not be able to change the behaviour or the amount
of the maintenance costs but a better understanding may help the person manage the cash
flow of your organization more efficiently.
4. Sell your budget – Frequently maintenance folks go to great lengths to build their
budgets. They’ve taken all of the right steps, put together the package of information, and
then submitted it. And that’s it. And in many cases that’s the only chance the maintenance
department has to convince others of the legitimacy of the submitted budget. However if
you have the opportunity, visit with the person that you have submitted the budget to. Try
to learn if that person is the type who automatically cuts everything by a certain
percentage. Remember, if the person changes the budget it’s better to know that fact ahead
of time rather than later when the situation may be more difficult or you are caught by
surprise. Let them know about you and the process that you went through to build the
budget. Learn more about how the budget is used so in the future you can create a more
useful budget.
That’s not all there is to know about budgeting but hopefully you have a better understanding about
its importance within the organization and how important maintenance is to the process. Although
frequently viewed as a meaningless exercise, budgeting’s true purpose is vital to your
organization’s long-term health.
12
2.4 Human Resource Planning
2.4.1 Maintenance Organisation Chart
A maintenance organisation chart (organ-gram) which can be used as a discussion base for
different types and sizes of factory signifies an approach in terms of the necessary functions which
must be assured. For that purpose, it should be understood that a function on the chart can be
carried out by one or several people, or conversely one person can assume several functions. It
also depends on the size. For small and medium-scale enterprises, the compilation of an organ-
gram can be taken in successive stages:
a) The first step a simple organisation chart for a small factory showing the basic functions
indispensable for an efficient maintenance operation,
b) The second stage concerns a bigger factory with one single production area and working 8
hours a day,
c) The third stage is for a new factory with several production areas and working on a
continuous basis (24 hours a day),
d) Finally, the fourth stage concerns the evolution of the proceeding organisation chart
towards alternatives depending on various particularities of plants.
In a maintenance department, five groups of function should be present in order to cover all the
tasks required
Job descriptions should be defined accordingly. In medium and large-size factories, this result in
one (or several) team(s) working a normal day and carrying out tasks exclusively. As to the team(s)
in shifts, they should take care of breakdowns and minor repairs. The latter case is only relevant
when the factory is working around the clock. For a factory which works only eight hours a day,
the above teams in shifts will do the normal timetable, but will still be in charge of corrective
maintenance exclusively.
Logistics support should be centralised: central workshop, spare parts, store, planning office, etc.
Independent decentralisation in the production areas should be avoided especially for small plants.
For bigger plants, the setting-up of communication links between each of the above services in the
main production area could be helpful, particularly for the planning office. Nevertheless, workshop
in this case should only be equipped with basic equipment, as it would not be efficient to have a
double set of equipment from the central workshop located in the production area.
13
The most efficient organisation is not the one that is perfect from the design point of view, but the
one that is applied correctly. This normally means a simple organisation at the initial stage. Clear,
concise explanations of the various mechanisms and information routings are necessary for the
personnel to fully understand the interdependencies. After the introductory period, the chosen
organisation is adapted step by step so that it may be improved and completed. The fundamental
principles for the organisation of maintenance are:
2.4.3 Position of the maintenance department in the organisation structure of the plant
The hierarchical position which should be assigned to the maintenance department is illustrated in
Figure 2-6, the general organisation chart.
Factory
Management
Figure 2-6: Position of the maintenance department on the plant organisation structure
As the objective the production and maintenance department is the same, i.e production at
minimum cost under good quality and safety conditions, it is indispensable that both departments
are placed on the same hierarchical level in order to allow interrelations, based on an equivalent
decision-making power.
The role of maintenance during acquisition of new equipment or plant extensions is of utmost
importance. During preparation of a project or contract negotiations, the purchaser must not only
be represented by production or commercial people, but also by maintenance, whose opinion must
be a deciding factor.
14
The centralisation of maintenance has a number of advantages. The most important are:
1. Keeping the board of directors advised by means of one source of information,
2. Efficient use of personnel and sound job preparation,
3. Avoidance of non-respect of procedure due to personnel turnover, by means of written
procedures and a central storage of information,
4. Better supervision and optimisation of maintenance costs through a clear separation
between “clients” and “suppliers”,
5. Better use of specialists, machines-tools and specific tools,
6. Optimisation and better follow-up of sub-contracted work,
7. The possibility of reducing down time for yearly overhauls and major repairs through
the concentration of all available resources,
8. The improvement of quality and efficiency of maintenance work through the
centralisation of experience gained in repair and trouble shooting for the whole plant,
9. An easier setting-up of adequate technical specifications for the purchase of new
equipment, taking into account better maintainability and measures to ensure proper
maintenance (such as technical documentation, training, spare parts, etc)
2.4.4 Maintenance Personnel Training
What is meant by “training programs” for maintenance employees? These are the instructional
programs that will enable employees to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to perform
planned, preventive, and predictive maintenance tasks.
Training programs are important because they help the employee better accomplish his or her job
with quality and efficiency. Training should not be thought of as remedial learning to correct some
deficiency in a worker’s skills, nor should it be considered a process that ends when the worker
reaches a certain predetermined level of knowledge or skill. The most productive, satisfied workers
tend to be those who continually grow with their jobs, developing new talents over time, and
training can be a part of that continual growth. Managers can create an atmosphere in which
employees will want to learn and grow.
The companies that recognize the need for ongoing training stand a better chance of surviving and
prospering. Those that don’t run the risk of technological obsolescence, decreased productivity,
and increased costs. Training of maintenance employees should represent a significant part of the
maintenance department’s activity and should be included in planning for plant or equipment
upgrades.
The continuous training of maintenance workers is a necessity in a quality maintenance
organization. In fact, a new worker’s training needs should be assessed when the worker is invited
to join the maintenance department. During the hiring process, management may administer
aptitude tests to determine whether the candidate has the capability to do the job he or she is
seeking, psychological tests to determine a candidate’s temperament, and interviews to gage the
candidate’s level of commitment to the job. Obviously, the candidate who is hired will perform
fairly well on all these tests, but the tests should reveal areas in which training will benefit the new
employee.
Ideally, after all tests and interviews are completed, an individual training program (ITP) should
be developed for the new employee. Here, an attempt is made to match the skills of the employee
against specific job assignments. Job task analysis is a significant help in the identification of skills
15
needed to perform a specific job. Job assignments and position descriptions will change with time,
and the constant updating of the ITP is essential to the career growth of each maintenance
employee. It is suggested that this information be reviewed with the employee every year.
Training skilled support is key to best practices. One issue receiving a considerable amount of
concern by production operation and maintenance managers is improving and maintaining the skill
set needed by the support staff to maintain equipment and systems. Manufacturers have established
training programs to keep their support staff current on emerging technologies. However, there is
a growing concern that as the complexity of automation systems steadily increases, the availability
of qualified technicians will diminish. Training support staff is essential as companies upgrade
automation systems and equipment, but the very training that is required makes them vulnerable
to staff attrition.
In terms of asset management, some companies consider maintenance and support of their
operations as a core competency. This implies more internal training and limiting outsourcing
maintenance to very complex systems and equipment. A best practice approach would be to foster
a lifetime career attitude through a continuous training program. Training involves two main
forms:
2.4.4.1 Methods
The methods used for training maintenance workers are varied and diversified, but the two main
categories are the traditional lecture/demonstration and practical “hands-on,”.
16
or skills learned and retained. If this method is compared to that of the interactive video, a much
higher retention rate can be seen in the latter.
Hands-on training may be conducted in a variety of settings. The science laboratory may have
been the first attempt at hands-on instruction. It must be stated that to develop a hands-on
classroom/laboratory is a very expensive undertaking. In addition to equipment costs, the ratio of
students to instructors must be low, allowing lots of individual help from the instructor. Some
skills are best taught in the laboratory or plant process center. Although the cost of hands-on
training is high, it is still the preferred method for skills training. In apprentice training the
laboratory exercises are generally followed up by field training with more senior mechanics or
technicians.
What is the best way to schedule training? This is a much-debated question. Some union contracts
demand a certain number of hours of training each month. A more practical approach is to schedule
training as needed, with the amount of time not fixed but flexible. The trainee should take enough
time to master the new skill to the appropriate level of competence.
Certainly not all training can be delivered this way. Some must be much more structured. For
example, training might be needed on a new piece of process equipment, with this training to be
supplied by the equipment vendor. The vendor decides on a specific day for two sessions of four
hours each to be delivered on the plant site. The maintenance department proceeds to schedule two
groups in four hour blocks. Training costs are paid to the vendor in accordance with the contracted
prices for the training.
This is an example of training that is expedient and easy to schedule, but is it cost effective in
terms of what is learned by each of the maintenance workers who attended the training? An
alternate approach to meeting the training needs would be to select three lead mechanics to meet
with the vendor. In this approach, after orientation to and discussion of the new piece of equipment,
the lead mechanics work on the unit in the plant and perform the required maintenance under the
supervision of the vendor. Each of the three mechanics performs the operation to the satisfaction
of the vendor and the customer. At a later time each of the three leaders forms groups of three
mechanics to perform the skill training required. This activity is rotated until all the mechanics are
able to perform the required skill to the satisfaction of the customer. This might be a more effective
way to schedule training and meet the needs of the customer and to motivate the employees.
Evaluating a training course after it has been given is time-consuming and can be tedious, but it is
very important. The lack of evaluation of a training experience can be frustrating to management
and to trainees. Frequently, the numbers of hours employees spend in training are noted and
checked off, but that should not be the extent of the evaluation. It is important to determine how
well the objectives of the training have been achieved. Otherwise, no one may know whether an
important skill has been learned correctly until the skill has to be applied, and by then it may be
too late.
17
One simple test is to have immediate supervisors review skill competence by observing a
demonstration by the employees who have just received training. Cumulative training evaluation
reports can be helpful to management at annual evaluations of employees.
Instructors also should be made accountable in the evaluation process. Employees should have an
opportunity to make criticisms or suggestions regarding the quality of the course and the skill of
the instructor, and to give this feedback on a confidential basis if they prefer.
Conventional wisdom regarding the outsourcing decision states that you should outsource your
"non-core" business activities. The difficulty with this approach, however, is that it provides no
guidance for deciding which activities are "non-core". Ultimately, in many organizations adopting
this approach, the discussion about what is "core" and what is "non-core" ends up being highly
subjective, and in the end, one person’s opinion ends up prevailing over another’s.
A better approach, and the one that Price Waterhouse Coopers typically adopts in advising clients
about the outsourcing decision is to look at the decision in terms of a two-by-two matrix, as in
Figure 2-7.
In this diagram, we consider the outsourcing decision along two dimensions. The first, Strategic-
Non Strategic, considers how important the activity proposed for outsourcing is to the organization
in achieving long term strategic competitive advantage in its chosen marketplace. In terms of
18
maintenance, this will clearly vary from organization to organization, depending on the industry
that it competes in, and its chosen strategy for competing in that industry. For example, for a
contract mining organization, where competitive advantage in the industry is largely driven by
being the lowest cost producer (and in which maintenance and asset ownership costs typically
equate to 55-60% of total costs), maintenance clearly is of strategic competitive importance to the
firm. Outsourcing maintenance in this environment would, in effect, be handing over control of
this potential source of competitive advantage to an external party. On the other hand, maintenance
to a hospital may be of less strategic importance, and therefore could, potentially be a candidate
for outsourcing.
The second dimension, Competitive-Non Competitive, relates to how competitively the function
being considered for outsourcing is currently being performed compared to the external
competitive marketplace. This relates primarily to the cost of the service, but could also be
extended to include service elements such as response time. Putting the two elements together
gives four possible outcomes.
1. Those functions that are of Strategic importance to the firm, and which are currently being
performed competitively require no further action - the status quo should be retained.
2. Those functions that are of Strategic importance to the firm, but which are not currently
being performed competitively with the external marketplace should not (in the long run)
be outsourced. Instead, a better long-term option is to re-engineer them to ensure that they
are performed at a competitive cost. It is possible that, as an interim measure to speed the
transition process, a tactical decision is made to outsource the function in the short term,
but as stated previously, in the long term the function, as a source of potential competitive
advantage, should be retained in-house.
3. Those functions that are not of Strategic importance to the firm, and which are not currently
being performed competitively with the external marketplace should be outsourced. There
is little value in investing in improving this function.
4. The final combination, those functions that are not of Strategic importance to the firm, but
which are being performed competitively with the external marketplace is more interesting.
A number of options exist for this function, including
o selling the function as a going concern,
o extending the function to provide services to external customers,
o outsourcing the function, or
o raise the profile of the function to turn it into a source of strategic competitive
advantage.
The preferred option depends largely on the function being considered. Does a competitive
outsourcing market exist?
A second consideration for outsourcing, that is related to the above model, is to decide whether a
competitive market for the outsourced services actually exists. In particular, when dealing with
highly specialized maintenance services (such as specialized turbine maintenance) or maintenance
occurring in remote areas (such as at remote mine sites), once an outsourced maintenance service
provider has been selected, this may create large barriers to entry for other potential maintenance
service providers wishing to enter into this market. While these barriers may be overcome, by
adopting an appropriate outsourcing strategy (such as letting work to two or more contractors,
rather than to one exclusively), awareness of this possible outcome prior to establishing the
19
outsourcing strategy is vital if the outsourcing organization is not to find itself "locked in" to a sole
provider.
2.5.2 How much maintenance to outsource
An important consideration in making the maintenance outsourcing decision is what aspects of
maintenance to outsource. If we consider the maintenance management process as consisting of
six major steps, as shown below, then a number of options exist.
20
Figure 2-9: Asset management strategy of an organization
For example, one challenge that needs to be met is how the maintenance contractors will interface
with the production operators, and the relative responsibilities and duties of each party. Many
organizations today are adopting Total Productive Maintenance principles, which encourage
Production operators to take a higher level of responsibility for equipment performance, and also
encourage them to perform many minor maintenance tasks. There is also a growing realization
that the manner in which equipment is operated can have a huge bearing on maintenance costs and
the maintenance activities required to be performed if equipment performance targets are to be
met. A high level of teamwork between the Maintenance contractors and the Production operators
is, therefore, vital to the successful completion of the contract. This leads to the view that an
alternative, and possibly better, approach to the outsourcing of maintenance is to include plant
operation in the scope of the contract. Hence the letting of Operations and Maintenance contracts,
particularly in the Power Generation industry.
Finally, taking things one step further again, there is also a growing realization that maintenance
is limited in achieving higher equipment performance by the fundamental design of the equipment
being maintained. The best that maintenance can achieve is the inherent reliability and
performance of the equipment that is built in by design. There is, therefore, a school of thought
that says that the best way to overcome this limitation, in an outsourcing environment, is to also
give the contractor responsibility for the design of the equipment. This can be done either by giving
him responsibility for ongoing equipment modifications, or by giving him responsibility for the
initial design of the equipment, as in a BOOM (Build, Own, Operate and Maintain) contract, which
is gaining favour in many infrastructure projects.
2.5.3 Establishing an appropriate tendering process
The tendering process for a major outsourcing contract is likely to be different to the contracting
process for major capital works in a few key aspects. Of particular importance will be the explicit
consideration of risk at various key points in the contracting process, and the identification of
appropriate strategies for managing those risks. These could take the form of either shaping or
hedging actions. Shaping actions are those actions undertaken to minimize the likelihood of the
risk factor occurring. Hedging actions are those actions undertaken to minimize the impact of the
risk factor, should it occur. In addition, the evaluation criteria for the selection of an appropriate
maintenance contractor are likely to be quite different from those for a major capital project. It is
likely that significant work will be required to develop appropriate criteria, and to ensure that
sufficient information is obtained from tenderers to be able to make an informed decision.
21
also, potentially, a huge undertaking. For example, in one recent outsourcing contract, a desired
outcome was the achievement of long-term plant integrity. Deciding how to measure that was a
difficult process.
2.5.5 Establishing an appropriate contract payment structure
There are a number of alternative contract payment structures. These include:
1. Fixed or Firm price
2. Variable Price
3. Price ceiling incentive
4. Cost plus incentive fee
5. Cost plus award fee
6. Cost plus fixed fee
7. Cost Plus Margin
Each of these price structures represents a different level of risk sharing between the contractor
and the outsourcing organization, and a number of considerations will need to be made in
determining the most appropriate payment structure. These include:
• The extent to which objective assessment of contract performance is possible
• The ease with which realistic targets can be set for contractor performance
• The administrative effort involved with each payment option
The degree of certainty with which the desired contract outcomes can be specified. Transition
arrangement may be put in place to gradually transfer the payment structure from one method to
another over time, as a greater degree of certainty over the requirements of the contract, and more
accurate knowledge of target levels of performance is established.
2.5.6 Establishing an appropriate contract administration process and structure
Before the contract is let, the client will need to have decided on the appropriate contract
administration process, and the roles and responsibilities of his own staff in managing the contract.
S/He will also need to establish the structures, processes and equip his people with the skills to
perform the required duties. Many potentially successful outsourcing contracts fail, simply because
the client did not manage those contracts effectively.
2.5.7 Establishing an appropriate structure for the contract document
In experience, most standard contracts in place at most organizations are not appropriate for large
outsourcing contracts. Many Standard Terms and Conditions are inappropriate for large, long-term
service-related contracts - particularly those that are of a partnering or gain-sharing nature. It has
been found that it is best to combine Special Conditions of Contract with revised Standard
Conditions of Contract to develop a new contract structure that is appropriate for the particular
contract being let.
22
• Computer systems - will the contractor have access to the client’s Computerized
Maintenance Management system? Will they maintain their own computerized
Maintenance records? Who is responsible for ensuring that all data in the Computerized
Maintenance Management systems are accurate?
• Materials Management - will the contractor provide his own materials, or will the client
provide these?
• Workshop facilities and tools - who owns and maintains these?
2.5.9 Agreeing contract termination arrangements
Another critical issue that needs to be addressed before the contract is let is how the situation will
be managed if the decision is made to terminate the existing contract. In particular, agreement
needs to be reached regarding the duties and obligations of the outgoing contractor in handing over
to the incoming contractor (or the client organization, should they decide to bring maintenance
back in-house).
2.5.10 Conclusion
While these are some of the major considerations for organizations considering outsourcing
maintenance, there are many others that are not covered in this course. Needless to say, the decision
to outsource any major function, such as maintenance, is not one that should be taken lightly, and
careful consideration of all major issues is vital, if the transition to contracted maintenance is to be
smooth and satisfactory to both parties.
23