Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.1.6 AP Psych Practice
5.1.6 AP Psych Practice
5.1.6 AP Psych Practice
Case 1: Kristin
Symptoms:
Rationale:
Kristin has sudden, very great fear with associated physical symptoms of panic attack: racing
heartbeat, chest pains, sweating, nausea, and dizziness. Thus, they are sudden panic attacks
with no previous history or concern for undervalued medical conditions. Also, her excessive
worrying about her family and concentration difficulties may point toward some underlying
anxiety disorder, but the primary diagnostic feature is that of panic attacks.
Case 2: Shelby
Symptoms:
Rationale:
Shelby's very rigid bedtime routine, with all the specifics and rituals to be conducted, like
checking on family members, is indicative of obsessive-compulsive behavior. The excessive
amount of time it consumes and the distress and disruption it causes are that which defines
OCD.
Case 3: Carl
Symptoms:
Rationale:
Clearly, Carl's blackouts, especially after a traumatic event, and an inability to remember
anything about such periods clearly point toward dissociative amnesia. The stress of his wife's
affair and insistence on divorce probably actuated this dissociative reaction. The recurrent
blackouts point to a chronic dissociative condition.
Case 4: Lyndsi
Symptoms:
Rationale:
Lyndsi presented with some auditory hallucinations ("people in the hamburgers"), delusional
thoughts, and suicidal behavior, which are some features of schizophrenia. Her
non-responsiveness, her agitation, led to a diagnosis of a severe psychotic disorder, although
schizophrenia was the most likely.
Case 5: Becky
Symptoms:
Rationale:
Becky expresses an extremely elated behavior, euphoria, and other erratic actions like running
naked and combative behavior that point out a manic episode. This is coupled with a history of
feeling down followed by a sudden period of elated mood thus meeting the criteria for bipolar
disorder. The sudden shift in mood and behavior is typical of manic episodes.
Part 2:
1.
Benefits:
Clearness and Communication: Diagnostic labels provide a clear, common language through
which mental health professionals convey the condition to a patient. This would ensure that
everyone knows what kind of disorder is in question and hence can plan effective treatment and
coordinate care.
Guidance for Treatment: Labels facilitate the identification of the most appropriate and
evidence-based treatment options. For instance, knowing that a patient actually has a major
depressive disorder will facilitate focusing on a more specialized level, say, on antidepressants
and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Disadvantages:
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Sometimes, the labeling of mental disorder provides the client with an
ascribed identity internalized by the individual, culminating in effects on self-esteem and
consequent behavior. This fulfils the prophecy in a self-supporting cycle where he starts living
by the expectations of others under the label attached.
Oversimplification: A diagnostic label oversimplifies the complexity of the mental condition. All
individuals who experience a disorder do so differently, and no label would ever be able enough
to account for all the fine lines of a condition; hence, it may amount to inappropriate or
insufficient treatment.
2.
Biological Factors:
Genetics: Evidence for heritability exists in family studies and twin studies. Individuals
whose family history includes depression are at an increased risk.
Brain Structure and Function: Changes in brain structure, for example, reduced
hippocampal volume, and malfunctioning in other areas, such as the prefrontal cortex
and amygdala, have been observed in people with depression.
Psychiological Factors:
Trauma and Stress: Experiences of trauma, abuse, or major life stressors like the loss of
a loved one or loss of job can precipitate depression. The way one perceives and
handles these events influences mental health.
Social factors :
Socioeconomic Status: Poverty, unemployment, and low SES are related to high levels
of depression resulting from increased stress and decreased resources.
Cultural Factors: The attitude one holds toward mental illness and the social
expectancies can influence the degree and expression of depression. Stigma and
discrimination may impede the search for help, arising from feelings of stigmatization
and discrimination.
3.
Genetic Factors:
Heritability: Very high degree of heritability. Having a first-degree relative with schizophrenia
Diagnosis increases the risk of developing schizophrenia. In the twin studies, there is higher
Concordance rate in monozygotic twins as compared to Dizygotic twins .
Neurobiological Factors:
Brain Structure Abnormalities: The common structural brain abnormalities found among
schizophrenic patients include enlarged ventricles, reduced volume of self-defined areas of the
brain, eg. the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus.
Environmental factors include prenatal and perinatal complications along with childhood trauma.
Known contributions to risk include prenatal stress, infections, malnutrition, and birth
complications such as hypoxia, which are precursors to schizophrenia.
Childhood trauma: An increased risk for predisposition to schizophrenia is associated with the
experience of abuse, neglect, and severe distressing events in childhood. These are some key
environmental factors that may aggravate genetic vulnerability in precipitating the disorder.
Psychosocial factors:
Stress and Coping: Extreme stress and poor adaptation to that stress may worsen the
symptoms and lead to the development of schizophrenia. The diathesis-stress model states that
individuals with a genetic risk may become schizophrenic from extreme stress.
Urbanicity and Social Environment: Urban upbringing and social adversity, such as social
isolation, discrimination, or unemployment, increase the risk of schizophrenic illness. In addition
to this, the social defeat hypothesis suggests that chronic social adversity helps contribute to the
development of the disorder.
Biological, psychological, and social elements interact in complex ways to facilitate being able to
diagnose and treat mental illness. Integrating the valuable insights from each of these
perspectives contributes to a comprehensive approach to mental health care.