Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 66

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region I
PANGASINAN DIVISION II
Binalonan

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: ROSARIO O. CABRERA/ WILFRE


Position: Position: Assistant Schools Division Supe
School: Rating Period: August 2022 - July 2023
District:
Date ofMidyear
Bureau/Center/Division: Schools Division Office PANGASINAN II Review: March - April 2023

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness
I. LEADING 1.1.2 Communicated the DepEd Year Round 20% 5 – All tasks were met 5 – All were completed 5 – All tasks were
STRATEGICALLY vision, mission and core values subscribing to standards using the required completed 3-5 days
I.1. Vision, Mission, & to the wider school community 4 – 3 tasks were met resources before the set
Core Values (10%) to ensure shared understanding subscribing to standards 4 – 3 tasks were schedule
& alignment of school policies, completed using the 4 - All tasks were
programs, projects and required resources completed 1-2 days
activities. before the set
schedule
3–2 3 - All tasks were
tasks were met 3–2 completed on the set
subscribing to standards tasks were completed schedule
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

using the required


Tasks: resources
a. Presented approved SIP/AIP

2–1
tasks was met subscribing 2 – 1 task was 2 - All
to standards completed using the tasks were
1 – No task was done required resources completed 3-5 days
b. Formulated 1 – No task was after the set
BE-LRCP with stakeholders completed using the schedule
c. Identified PAPs with plans of required resources 1- All tasks were
implementation completed woneeek
d. Submitted accomplishment or more after the
reports with pictures or videos time frame
I.2. School Planning & 1.2.2 Developed and Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 – 4 or more projects 5-submitted plan/s
Implementation (5%) implemented with planning team subscribing to standards aligned to institutional 3-5 days before the
(SGC) school plans aligned with 4 – 3 tasks were met goals & policies were target date
institutional goals and policies subscribing to standards implemented
Tasks: 3 – 2 tasks were met 4 -3 projects aligned to
a.Crafted/Updated the SIP/ AIP subscribing to standards institutional goals &
w/ School Planning Team/SGC 2 – 1 task was met policies were
duly approved by Authorities subscribing to standards implemented
b. Dessiminated/ communicated 1 – No task was done 3 – 2 projects aligned to 4-
plans to stakeholders thru institutional goals & submitted plan/s 1-2
letters/ school policies were days before the
memoranda/meetings. implemented target date
c. Gathered feedback/s from 2 - 1 project aligned to
stakeholders that served as basis institutional goals &
for adjustment. d. policies was implemented
Prepared planning results/ 1 - No project aligned to
outcomes with narrative reports the institutional goals &
& pictures (e.g. Project policies was implemented 3-
Workplan With Budget submitted plan/s on
Proposal) the target date 2-
e. Submitted pictures/ videos if submitted plan/s 3-5
there’s any during the conduct days after the target
of planning conferences date

1-submitted
plan/s 1 week after
the target date
I.3. Policy 1.3.3 Engaged stakeholders in Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 – 4 or more memoranda, 5-submitted plan/s
Implementation (5%) the implementation of policies subscribing to standards communicaton letters, 3-5 days before the
to ensure consistency of school 4 – 3 tasks were met meetings were conducted target date
operations with national & local subscribing to standards to engage stakeholders
laws, regulations & issuances. 3 – 2 tasks were met 4 – 3 memoranda,
Tasks: subscribing to standards communicaton letters,
a. Crafted Student Handbook 2 – 1 task was met meetings were conducted
b. Dessiminated information subscribing to standards to engage stakeholders
thru communication letters/ 1 – No task was done 3 – 2 memoranda, 4-
school memoranda communicaton letters, submitted plan/s 1-2
c. Prepared minutes of meetings/ meetings were conducted days before the
conferences with stakeholders to engage stakeholders target date
and recorded attendance. 2 – 1 memorandum,
d. Prepared and submitted communicaton letter,
accomplishment reports on the meeting was conducted to
implementation of policies with engage stakeholderspolicy
pictures during meetings/ group 1 – No memorandum,
chats with stakeholders communicaton letter, 3-
meeting was conducted to submitted plan/s on
engage stakeholderspolicy the target date 2-
submitted plan/s 3-5
days after the target
date

1-submitted
plan/s 1 week after
the target date
I.4 Research & 1.4.1 Identified relevant research Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - 4 or more basic or 5 - implemented
Innovation (5%) findings from reliable sources in subscribing to standards action research/innovative research/workplan
facilitating data-driven and workplan were conducted 3-5 days before the
evidence-based innovations to 4 - 3 basic or target date
improve school performance. action research/innovative
Tasks: workplan were conducted
3 - 2 basic or
action research/innovative
4 - 3 tasks were met workplan were conducted
subscribing to standards 2 - 1 basic or 4-
action research/innovative implemented
workplan were conducted research/workplan
a. 1 - No basic or 1-2 days before the
Gathered and compiled school action research/innovative target date
data workplan were conducted

3 - 2 tasks were met


subscribing to standards

b. Analyzed 3-
school data implemented
research/workplan
on the target date

2 - 1 task was met 2


suscribing to standards - implemented
c. Conducted & research/workplan
implemented Basic and Action 3-5 days
Research and or Innovative implemented
Work Plan

1 - No task was 1-
done implemented
d. Prepared research/workplan 1
accomplishment report on week after the target
I.5 Program design and 1.5.1 Displayed understanding Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - All of the data/records 5-Data/records were
implementation (5%) of the implementation of subscribing to standards were accurately filed both submitted/issued to
programs in the school that hard and soft form interested parties on
support the development of 3 to 5 days before
learners the set time

Tasks:
4 - All of the
4 - 4 tasks were met data/records were
subscribing to standards accurately filed both hard
and soft form with 1 or 2
mistakes 4-Data/records were
submitted/issued to
a. Crafted action plans on interested parties on
different child development 1 to 2 days before
programs and projects the set time
3 - 3 tasks were met 3 - All of the data records
subscribing to standards were accurately filed both
b. hard and soft form with 3
Implemented the approved child or 4 mistakes
development program plans
(SNED, CPP, Pupil/Student 3-
Government/ Guidance Data/records were
Counselling) submitted/issued to
2 - 2 tasks were met interested parties on
suscribing to standards the set time
c. 2-Data/records were
Monitored and evaluated the submitted/issued to
program implementation 2- interested parties on
All of the data/records 1 to 2 days after the
were accurately filed both set time
hard and soft form with 5
1 - only 1 or No or more mistakes
d. task was done
Submitted approved
accomplishment report with 1-Data/records were
proofs of evidences on improved submitted/issued to
II. MANAGING 2.1.3 Capacitated school Year Round 20% 5 – All tasks were met 5 - All the documents are 5 – All of the data/
SCHOOL personnel in managing school subscribing to standards complete, filed on both records were
OPERATIONS & data and information using 4 – 4 tasks were met hard and soft form with no submitted on time
RESOURCES technology, including ICT, to subscribing to standards report on inaccuracy 4 – 3 of the data/
ensure efficient and effective 3 – 3 tasks were met records were
II.1. Records
school operations. subscribing to standards submitted on time
Management (5%) Tasks: 2 – 2 tasks were met 3 – 2 of the data/
subscribing to standards records were
1 – only 1 or No task was 4 - All the documents submitted on time
done are complete, filed on 2 – only 1 of the
both hard and soft form data/ records was
with 1 or 2 mistakes submitted on time
1 – No data/ record
a. Maintained an updated Data was submitted on
Information Board (e.g. LIS- time
EBEIS)
b. Utilized e-SRC to record data 3 - All of the
& accomplishments data records are complete,
c. Prepared & submitted records filed on both hard and soft
of KPIs form with 3 or 4 mistakes
d. Utilized e-class records
e.Conducted InSeTs/ LAC
Sessions on managing school
data using technology

2 - All of the
data/records are complete,
filed on both hard and
soft form with 5 or more
mistakes
II.2. Financial 2.2.3 Exhibited efficient and Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 - All the documents are 5 - MOOE reports
Management (10%) effective practices in the subscribing to standards complete, filed on both were submitted 3
management of finances 4 – 3 tasks were met hard and soft form with no weeks after receipt
consistently adhering to policies, subscribing to standards report on inaccuracy or earlier
guideines and issuances in 3 – 2 tasks were met 4 - MOOE reports
allocation, procurement, subscribing to standards were submitted 4
disburesement and liquidation 2 – 1 task was met weeks after receipt
aligned with the school plan subscribing to standards 3 - MOOE reports
Tasks: 1 – No task was done 4 - All the documents were submitted 5
a. Crafted Annual are complete, filed on weeks after receipt
Procurement Plan (APP) and Work both hard and soft form 2 - MOOE reports
and Financial Plan (WFP) with 1 or 2 mistakes were submitted 6
duly approved by Authorities
weeks after receipt
b. Submitted MOOE
Liquidation Report with 1- MOOE reports
certification of liquidation and were submitted 7
Summary of LRs weeks after receipt
c. Maintained updated transparency 3 - All of the or later
board data records are complete,
d. Managed the filed on both hard and soft
uploading of outsourced resources form with 3 or 4 mistakes
in theDPDS

2 - All of the
data/records are complete,
filed on both hard and
soft form with 5 or more
mistakes
II.3 School Facilities & 2.3.3 Established shared Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 - 4 or more facilities/ 5-submitted
Equipment (5%) accountability in managing subscribing to standards equipment were required repor/s 3-5
school facilities and equipment 4 – 4 tasks were met purchased/ repaired, days before the
in adherence to policies, subscribing to standards constructed/ acquired target date
guidelines and issuances 3 – 3 tasks were met
on acquisition, recording, subscribing to standards
utilization, repair and 2 – 2 tasks were met
maintenance, storage and subscribing to standards
disposal 1 – 1 or no task was done 4 - 3 facilities/ equipment
were purchased/ repaired, 4-
constructed/ acquired submitted required
Tasks: repor/s 1-2 days
a. Prepared list of purchased before the target
equipment , constructed/ date
repaired/ improved facilities
with pictures 3 - 2 facilities/
equipment were
purchased/ repaired,
b.Summary of Liquidation constructed/ acquired
Reports showing the purchased 3-submitted
equipment, required repor/s on
construction/repaired/ improved the target date
facilities 2-submitted
c. Filed a copy of National 2 - 1 facility/ required repor/s 3-5
School Building Inventory equipment was purchased/ days after the target
(NSBI) repaired, constructed/ date
d. Prepared copy of School acquired
Inventory of Properties
e. Reports on waste material
disposal for repairs/ replacement 1-submitted
if there’s any required repor/s 1
1 - No facility/ week after the target
equipment was purchased/ date
repaired, constructed/
acquired
II.4 Management of 2.4.2 Managed staffing such as Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - All forms were 5-submitted
Staff (5%) teaching load distribution and subscribing to standards prepared & implemented required repor/s 3-5
grade level and subject area 4-3 forms were prepared days before the due
assignment in adherence to laws, & implemented date
policies, guidelines and 3-2 forms were prepared
issuances based on the needs of & implemented
the school 2-1 form was presented &
implemented
4 - 3 tasks were met 1 - No form was presented
subscribing to standards & implemented 4-submitted
required repor/s 1-2
days before the due
date

3 - 2 tasks were met


subscribing to standards
Tasks: 3-submitted
required repor/s on
the due date
2-submitted
required repor/s 3-5
days after the due
2 - 1 task was met date
subscribing to standards

1-submitted
required repor/s 1
week after the due
a. Updated school plantilla date
1 - No task was done
II.5 School safety for 2.5.2 Managed school safety for Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - All forms were 5-submitted
disaster preparedness, disaster preparedness, mitigation subscribing to standards prepared & implemented required repor/s 3-5
mitigation and and resiliency to ensure 4-3 forms were prepared days before the due
resiliency (5%) continuous delivery of & implemented date
instrucction 3-2 forms were prepared
& implemented
Tasks: 2-1 form was presented &
implemented
4 - 3 tasks were met 1 - No form was presented
subscribing to standards & implemented 4-submitted
required repor/s 1-2
days before the due
date
a. Organized school-based
DRRM Team

3 - 2 tasks were met


subscribing to standards
3-submitted
b. required repor/s on
Presented approved School the due date
Contingeny Plan 2-submitted
required repor/s 3-5
days after the due
2 - 1 task was met date
subscribing to standards
c. Implemented
activities imbeded in the plans
1-submitted
required repor/s 1
week after the due
date
d. 1 - No task was done
Submitted accomplishment
report
III. FOCUSING ON 3.1.3 Worked with teams in the Year Round 20% 5 – All tasks were met 5 – 100% crafted 5 - Reviewed IMs
TEACHING & conduct of review, subscribing to standards Instructional Materials were submitted 3-5
LEARNING contextualization and were used days before the due
III.1. School-based implementation of learning 4 – 75% crafted date 4-
standards to assist teachers in Instructional Materials Reviewed IMs
Review,
making the curriculum relevant were used were1-2 days before
Contextualization, & for learners (School, District, 3 – 50% crafted the due date
Implementation of Division) Instructional Materials 3 - Reviewed
Learning Standards Tasks: 4 - 3 tasks were met were used IMs were submitted
(5%) a. Facilitated the conduct of review subscribing to standards 2 – 25% crafted on time
of Instructional materials like Instructional Materials 2 - Reviewed IMs
SLMs, VLs and AS's were used were submitted 1-2
b. Issued School Memorandum 1 – 0% crafted days after the due
where names are indicated as EWC Instructional Materials date 1-
member/ validator or other
were used Reviewed IMs were
functions related to it
submitted 3-5 days
c. Compiled list of SLMs/ VLs/
3 - 2 tasks were met after the due date
Test Questions/ Assessment
subscribing to standards
items/Activity Sheets reviewed/
validated in
School/District/Division
d. Updated inventory of SLMs/
VLs/ASs reviewed/validated
(samples only)
e. Pictures during
2 - 1 task was met
review/validation
subscribing to standards

1 - No task was
done
III.2. Teaching 3.2.2 Provided technical Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 – provided 5 - provided
Standards & assistance to teachers on subscribing to standards TA/Coaching and coaching and
teaching standards and Mentoring to 100% of the mentoring on
Pedagogies (10%) immediately after the
pedagogies with in and across Mentees
monitoring 4-
learning areas to improve their 4 – provided
provided coaching and
teaching practices. TA/Coaching and mentoring 3-5 days
Tasks: Mentoring to 75%-99% of after monitoring
a. Consolidated Reports on e- the Mentees 3 - provided
SAT and other assessment tools 4 – 3 tasks 3 – provided coaching and
b. Prepared and submitted were met subscribing to TA/Coaching and mentoring 3-5 days
Supervisory Plan and Report standards Mentoring to 50%-74% of after monitoring
c. Accomplished Performance the Mentees 2 - provided
monitoring and coaching 2 – provided coaching and
mentoring 3-5 days
form/mentoring plan TA/Coaching and after monitoring
d. Submitted reports on Mentoring to 25%-49% of 1- - provided
Performance Monitoring and the Mentees coaching and
Coaching 3 - 2 tasks 1 – provided mentoring 3-5 days
e. Prepared summary of IPCRF were met subscribing to TA/Coaching and after monitoring
standards Mentoring to 1%-24% of
the Mentees

2 - 1 task
was met subscribing to
standards

1 - No
task was done
III.3. Teacher 3.3.2 Used validated feedback Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5- Utilized the feedback
Performance Feedback obtained from learners, parents subscribing to standards to improve 100% of the
(5%) and other stakeholders to help teachers concerned 4-
teachers improve their Utilized the feedback to
performance. improve 75%-99% of the
Tasks: teachers concerned
a. Prepared Feedback 3- Utilized the feedback
Mechanism that helps teachers to improve 50%-74% of
improve their performance 4 – 3 tasks the teachers concerned
b. Conducted the were met subscribing to 2- Utilized the
evaluation of teachers' standards feedback to improve
performance during Card Day 25%-49% of the teachers
and other stakeholders assembly concerned 1-
c. Validated the feedback Utilized the feedback to
result and submitted report improve 1-24% of the
d. Reported the feedback to teachers concerned
concerned teachers. 3 - 2 tasks
were met subscribing to
standards

2 - 1 task
was met subscribing to
standards
III.4 Learner 3.4.2 Utilized learning outcomes Year Round 5- 4 tasks were met 5 - Utilized 4 or more 5 - All of the
achievement and other in developing data-based subscribing to standards interventions data/records were
performance indicators interventions to maintain learner prepared on time
(5%) achievement and attain other 4 - 3 of the
performance indicators data/records were
submitted on time
Tasks: 3 - 2 of the
data/records were
4 - 3 tasks were met 4 - Utilized 3 submitted on time
subscribing to standards interventions 2 - only 1 of the
data/records were
submitted on time
a. 1 - No data/records
Checked quarterly MPS/ was submitted on
Reading /Numeracy results time

3 - 2 tasks were met 3-


subscribing to standards Utilized 2 inteventions

b.
Presented summary of least &
best mastered competencies per
learning and per grade level

2 - 1 task was met


subscribing to standards 2 - Utilized 1 intervention

c.
Assisted in the conduct of
remediation/intervention
III.5 Learning 3.5.1 Demonstrated knowledge Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - Checked & utilized 5 - All of the
Assessment (5%) and understanding of learning subscribing to standards learning assessment tools data/records were
assessment tools, strategies and in 4 quarters prepared on time
utilization of results consistent 4 - Checked & utilized 4 - 3 of the
with curriculum requirements learning assessment tools data/records were
Tasks: in 3 quarters submitted on time
3 - Checked & utilized 3 - 2 of the
learning assessment tools data/records were
4 - 3 tasks were met in 2 quarters submitted on time
subscribing to standards 2 - Checked & utilized 2 - only 1 of the
learning assessment tools data/records were
in 1 quarter submitted on time
a. Checked 1 - No learning 1 - No data/records
constructed teacher-made test w/ assessment tools checked was submitted on
TOS & utilized time

3 - 2 tasks were met


subscribing to standards
b.
Provided TA in the utilization of
learning assessment tools

2 - 1 task was met


c. Checked & analyzed subscribing to standards
submitted test results
IV. DEVELOPING 4.1.2 Set personal and Year Round 20% 5 - All Tasks were met 5 - Attended 4
SELF & OTHERS professional development goals professional development
IV.1. Personal & based on self-assessment aligned activities
Professional with the PPSSH. 4 - Attended 3
Tasks: professional development
Development (5%)
a. Aligned crafted OPCRF with activities
PPSSH professional goals & 3 - Attended 2
objectives professional development
b. Prepared IPDP 4 - 3 tasks were met activities
c. Attended outside school subscribing to standards 2 - Attended 1
seminars and trainings (list professional development
seminars attended evidenced by activity
certificates) 1 - No significant
d. Initiated/conducted school professional development
LAC sessions on professional activity attended
development
3 - 2 tasks were met
subscribing to standards

2
– 1 task was met
subscribing to standards

1 - No task was done


IV.2. Professional 4.2.2 Applied professional Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 – 5 or more trainings 5 -Trainings to assist
others to improve
Reflection & Learning reflection and learning to subscribing to standards w/c contributed to ones performance were
(5%) improve ones practice. professional improvement conducted on or before
Tasks: were conducted/ attended the set schedule
a. Presented approved Action 4 – 4 trainings w/c 4 – Trainings to assist
others to improve
Plan/ Re-entry plan contributed to ones performance were
b. Conducted re-echo trainings professional improvement conducted 1 week after
c. Prepared approved Activity 4 were conducted/ attended the set schedule
Request to conduct InSeTs/ - 3 tasks were met 3 – 3 trainings w/c 3 – Trainings to assist
others to improve
SLACs/ FGD subscribing to standards contributed to ones performance were
d. Provided TA to teachers as an professional improvement conducted 2 weeks after
application of professional were conducted/ attended the set schedule
learnings 2 – 2 trainings w/c 2 – Trainings to assist
others to improve
contributed to ones performance were
professional improvement conducted 3 weeks after
were conducted/ attended the set schedule
3 - 2 tasks were met 1 - 1 or No training w/c 1 – Training to assist
others to improve
subscribing to standards contributed to ones performance was
professional improvement conducted 1 month after
was conducted/ attended the set schedule

2 - 1 task was met


subscribing to standards

1 – No task was done


IV.3. Professional 4.3.2 Participated in professional Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5-Participated to at least 4
Networks (5%) networks to upgrade knowledge subscribing to standards relevant trainings
and skills and to enhance 4 – 3 tasks were met conducted by professional
practice. subscribing to standards organization/s
Tasks: 3 – 2 tasks were met
a. Compiled memorandum of subscribing to standards
trainings from proffessional 2 – 1 task was met 4-
organizations/ communities subscribing to standards Participated to 3 relevant
1 – No task was done trainings conducted by
professional
organization/s

b. Obtained Certificates of
Participation to trainings
conducted by professional 3-Participated to 2
organizations relevant trainings
conducted by professional
organization/s
c. Prepared
summary of trainings/
orientations attended to
professional organization 2-
d. Received Certificate of Participated to 1 relevant
Membership to professional training conducted by a
organizations professional organization

1- No
participation at all
IV.4 Performance 4.4.1 Demonstrated knowledge Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - All programs/activities
Management (5%) and understanding of the subscribing to standards were aligned w/
implementation of the organizational strategic
performance management goals
system in improving school 4 - 3 programs/activities
personnel and office were aligned w/
performance Tasks: organizational strategic
goals
4 - 3 tasks were met 3 - 2 programs/activities
subscribing to standards were aligned w/
organizational strategic
goals
2 - 1 program/activitiy
a. Ensured 100% was aligned w/
assessment of teachers' organizational strategic
performance (summary of goals
IPCRF) 3 - 2 tasks were met 1 - No programs/activities
subscribing to standards

b. Utilized the results of the


assessment tool (Part 4/ IDP)

2 - 1 task was met


subscribing to standards
c. Proposed
programs on the results of the
assessment tool (Action Plan,
LAC Plan, AR, IWP)
IV.5 Professional 4.5.1 Demonstrated knowledge Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 – 5 or more trainings
development of school and understanding of subscribing to standards w/c contributed to ones
personnel (10%) professional development in professional improvement
enhancing strengths and in were conducted/ attended
addressing perfromance gaps 4 – 4 trainings w/c
among school personnel contributed to ones
Tasks: professional improvement
were conducted/ attended
4 - 3 tasks were met 3 – 3 trainings w/c
subscribing to standards contributed to ones
professional improvement
were conducted/ attended
a. 2 – 2 trainings w/c
Compiled Individual contributed to ones
Performance Development Plan professional improvement
of teachers were conducted/ attended
3 - 2 tasks were met 1 - 1 or No training w/c
subscribing to standards contributed to ones
professional improvement
was conducted/ attended

2 - 1 task was met


subscribing to standards
b. Consolidated e-
SAT results of teachers
V. BUILDING 5.1.2 Built constructive Year Round 20% 5 – All tasks were met 5 - Gained support from 5 5-submitted
CONNECTIONS relationships with authorities, subscribing to standards stakeholders required repor/s 3-5
V.1. Management of colleagues, parents and other 4 – 4 tasks were met 4 - Gained support from 4 days before the
Diverse Relationship stakeholders to foster an subscribing to standards stakeholders target date
enabling and supportive 3 – 3 tasks were met 3 - Gained support from 3
(5%)
environment to learners. subscribing to standards stakeholders
Tasks: 2 – 2 tasks were met 2 - Gained support from 2
a. Initiated partnership through subscribing to standards stakeholders
meetings/ 1 – 1 or no task was done 1 - Gained support from 1
conferencies/MOA/MOU stakeholder 4-
b. Printed copies of the quarterly submitted required
DepEd Partnership Data-based repor/s 1-2 days
System (DPDS) before the target
c. Filed BE Form 5 (Records of date
Donations)
d. Prepared Programs/
attendance sheets/ minutes of
meetings
e. Recorded activities thru
pictures/ videos 3-submitted
required repor/s on
the target date 2-
submitted required
repor/s 3-5 days
after the target date

1-submitted
required repor/s 1
week after the target
date
V.2. Management of 5.2.2 Managed school Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 – 3 School 5-submitted
School Organizations organizations such as learner subscribing to standards Organizations applied required repor/s 3-5
(5%) organization, Faculty Clubs and 4 – 3 tasks were met relevant policies & days before the
Parent-Teachers Associations subscribing to standards guidelines to support target date
by applying relevant policies 3 – 2 tasks were met institutional goals
and guidelines to support the subscribing to standards 4 – 2 School
attainment of institutional goals. 2 – 1 task was met Organizations applied
Tasks: subscribing to standards relevant policies &
a. Organized relevant school 1 – No task was done guidelines to support
organizations: institutional goals 4-
•Teachers’ Club 3 – 1 School Organization submitted required
•Supreme Pupil-Student applied relevant policies repor/s 1-2 days
Government (SPG/SSG)) & guidelines to support before the target
•General PTA institutional goals date
b. Prepared minutes of meetings 2 – Policies & guidelines
with the school organizations were irrelevant to support
c. Listed Action plan/activities institutional goals
conducted with the 1 – No Organization
organizations applying relevant implemented relevant
policies & guidelines policies & guidelines 3-submitted
d. Prepared accomplishment required repor/s on
reports on activities w/ the the target date 2-
stakeholders submitted required
repor/s 3-5 days
after the target date

1-submitted
required repor/s 1
week after the target
date
V.3. Inclusive Practice 5.3.2 Exhibited inclusive Year Round 5 – All tasks were met 5 – 4 or more practices
(5%) practices such as gender subscribing to standards were exhibited thru
sensitivity, physical & mental 4 – 3 taskswere met activities
health awareness & culture subscribing to standards 4 – 3 practices were
responsiveness, to foster 3 – 2 tasks were met exhibited thru activities
awareness, acceptance and subscribing to standards 3 – 2 practices were
respect. 2 – 1 task was met exhibited thru activities
Tasks: subscribing to standards 2 – 1 practice was
a. Prepared list of activities on 1 – No task was presented exhibited thru activities
inclusive practices such as 1 – No activity conducted
GAD, Women’s Month, Career
Guidance, SNED, Mental Health
Enhancement, IP's Reading &
Art Exhibits, etc.
b. Conducted programs w'
invitation/ letter of
communication

c.
Prepared accomplishment report
on the conduct of inclusive
practices activities
d. Documented activities thru
pictures/ videos during the
activities / posted materials
V.4 Communication 5.4.1 Demonstrated competent Year Round 5 - All tasks were met the 5 - All different
(5%) skills in speaking and writing, as required communication communication platforms
well as in utilizing standards were utilized
communication platforms, in 4 - 3 communication
communicating with teachers, platforms were utilized
learners, parents and other 3 - 2 communication
stakeholders platforms were utilized
2 - 1 communication
4 - 3 tasks platform was utilized
were met the required 1 - No prepared
communication standards communication

Tasks:

3 - 2 tasks were met


the required
a. Prepared school communication standards
memorandum (Samples only)

b. Maintained 2 - 1 task was met


functional social media page the required
(FB, GC) communication standards

c. Utilized
MOA/resolutions to
V.5 Community 5.5.1 Involved the community Year Round 5 - All tasks were met 5 - Gained support for 5 - Involved
Engagement (10%) such as parents, alumni, subscribing to standards learner development as parents/stakeholders
authorities, industries, and other well as school and across 4 quarters
stakeholders, in school community improvement 4 - Involved
programs, projects and activities 4 - Gained support for parents/stakeholders
to gain support for learner learner development as across 3 quarters
development as well as school well as school 3 - Involved
and community improvement improvement parents/stakeholders
4 - 3 tasks were met 3 - Gained support for across 2 quarters
subscribing to standards learner development in the 2 - Involved
classroom parents/stakeholders
2 - Gained support for across 1 quarter
Tasks: learner development 1 - No involvement
1 - No relevant learner
improvement gained

3 - 2 tasks were met


subscribing to standards

a. Prepared communication
letters/or any other forms of
communication for stakeholders
support

2 - 1 task was met


subscribing to standards

b. Involved
parents and alumni and other
partners/stakeholders in
planning school
programs/activities/projects 1 - No task was
done

Overall Rating for Accomplish


Adjectival R
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.50-5.00 Outstanding
3.50-4.49 Very Satisfactory
2.50-3.49 Satisfactory
1.50-2.49 Unsatisfactory
below 1.49 Poor

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

RUSSEL JIM V. TAMAYO, PhD, CESO VI


Principal __/HT __/OIC/TIC Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
ublic of the Philippines
tment of Education
Region I
ASINAN DIVISION II
Binalonan

D COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

ROSARIO O. CABRERA/ WILFREDO E. SINDAYEN, CESO VI


Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
August 2022 - July 2023
TO
BE
March - April 2023 FILL
ED
IN
DUR
ING
EVA RATING
Actual Results LUA SCORE
Q E T Ave.
TIO
N
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Overall Rating for Accomplishments 0.000


Adjectival Rating POOR
Approving Authority:

VIVIAN LUZ S. PAGATPATAN, PhD, CESO VI


Schools Division Superintendent
Editable

NOTE:
Accomplish only
the white cells
NOTE:
Accomplish only
the white cells
under Q, E, and T
Editable
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater:
Position: 0 Position:
School: 0 Rating Period:
District: 0
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Schools Division Office PANGASINAN II Date of Midyear Review:

Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Q E T
Objective
I.1 10.0% 0 0 0
I.2 5.0% 0 0 0
KRA 1 20% I.3 5.0% 0 0 0
I.4 5.0% 0 0 0
I.5 5.0% 0 0 0
II.1 5.0% 0 0 0
II.2 10.0% 0 0 0
KRA 2 20% II.3 5.0% 0 0 0
II.4 5.0% 0 0 0
II.5 5.0% 0 0 0
III.1 5.0% 0 0 0
III.2 10.0% 0 0 0
KRA 3 20% III.3 5.0% 0 0
III.4 5.0% 0 0 0
III.5 5.0% 0 0 0
IV.1 5.0% 0 0
IV.2 5.0% 0 0 0
KRA 4 20% IV.3 5.0% 0 0
IV.4 5.0% 0 0
IV.5 10.0% 0 0
V.1 5.0% 0 0 0
V.2 5.0% 0 0 0
KRA 5 20% V.3 5.0% 0 0
V.4 5.0% 0 0
V.5 10.0% 0 0 0
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

0 RUSSEL JIM V. TAMAYO, PhD, CESO VI VIVIAN LUZ S. PAGATPATAN, PhD, CESO VI
Principal IV Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent
REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent


August 2022 - July 2023

March - April 2023

Numerical Ratings
Ave Score
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Final Rating 0.00
Adjectival Rating POOR

VIVIAN LUZ S. PAGATPATAN, PhD, CESO VI


Schools Division Superintendent
PART II- COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES
Self- Managemenrt Teamwork Leading People
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 4 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. Use basic persuasion techniques in a discussion or presentation

Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and puposive and Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and e.g.,staff mobilization, appeals to reason and/or emotions, uses data and

takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the goal accomplishment across the organization. 4 examples visual aids.
organization. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. Persuades, convinces or influences others, in order to have specific
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. impact or effect.
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through GANT chart, checklists,etc.) to Drives consensus and team ownership of decissions "Sets a good example", is a credible and respected leader; and
achieved goals. Work constructively and collaboratively with others and across demonstrates desired behavior
Sets high quality, challenging realistic goals for self & others. organization to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. Forwards a personal, professional and work unit needs an interest
in an issue.
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation Assumes a pivotal role in promoting the development of an inspiring ,
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and relevant vision for the organization and influences others to share
Ethical Standards for public officials and employees(RA 6713). problems. ownership of DepEd goals, in order to create an effective work environment.
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the Takes personal resposibility for dealing with and / or correcting People performance Management
impact of his/her actions and decissions. customer service issues and concern. Makes a specific changes in the performance management system or
Maintains professional image being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women in own work methods to improve performance(e.g. does something
punctuality, good grooming and communication. empowerment. better, faster at lower cost, more efficiently; improves quality, customer
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. Paricipates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and satisfaction, morale, revenues.
Acts with a sense of urgency and resposibility and to meet the organization's needs strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions. Sets performance standards and progress of employees based on
improve systems and help others improved their effectiveness. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through office and department targets.
simplified procedures that will further enhnce service delivery. provides feedback and technical assistance such as coaching for
Innovation performance improvement and action planning.
Result Focus Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective States performance expectations clearly and checks understanding
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. solutions . Foster new ideas ,processes and suggest better ways and commitment.
Avoids network mistakes and wastages through effective work methods by placing to do things (cost and / or operational efficiency. Performs all the stages of result-based performance management
Organizational needs before personal needs. Demostrates an ability to think" beyond the box" . Continously system supported by evidence and required documents/ forms.
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher People development
operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce every value results. Improves the skills and effectiveness of individuals through employing
satisfactory quality of work in terms of usefulness/ acceptability and completeness promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop a range of development strategies.
with no supervision required. original ideas or solutions. Facilitates work force effectivenessthrough coaching and motivating
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustrations at waste or Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions developing people within a work environment that promotes mutual
inefficiency . May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. that improve the work unit and organization. trust and respect.
Makes specific changes in the system or in own work method to improve Uses indigenous methods to accomplish responsibilities. Conceptualizes and implements learning interventions to meet identified
performance. Example may include doing something better,faster, at a lower Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with training needs.
cost,more efficiently; or improving quality , customer satisfaction,morale, minimal resources Does long term coaching or training by arranging appropriate and
without setting any specific goal. helpful assignments, formal training or other experiences for the purpose
of supporting a persons learning and development.
Cultivates a learning environment by structuring interactive experince
such as looking for future opportunities that are in support of
achieving individual career goals.

OVERALL COMPETENCY
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 0.00

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES 0.00

OVERALL RATING 0.000

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:


0 RUSSEL JIM V. TAMAYO, PhD, CESO VI VIVIAN LUZ S. PAGATPATAN, PhD, CESO VI
Principal __/HT __/OIC/TIC Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region I
Pangasinan Division II
0
0

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater: ROSARIO O. CABRERA/ WILFREDO E. SINDAYEN, CESO VI


Position: 0 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: August 2022 - July 2023 Date of Review: March - April 2023

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives


0.00 POOR

Rater - Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior


0 RUSSEL JIM V. TAMAYO, PhD, CESO VI
Signature Signature

Date Date
March - April 2023 March - April 2023
NDAYEN, CESO VI
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region I
Pangasinan Division II
0

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Review Period: August 2022 - July 2023 Date of Review: March - April 2023

Action Plan
Strengths Developmental Needs Timeline
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

RATEE: RATER: APPROVING AUTHORITY:

0 RUSSEL JIM V. TAMAYO, PhD, CESO VI VIVIAN LUZ S. PAGATPATA


Principal __/HT __/OIC/TIC Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Sup
Resources Needed

S. PAGATPATAN, PhD, CESO VI


s Division Superintendent

You might also like