3/9/24, 9:58 PM Thread: The 2017 WannaCry attacks have since been attributed ...

Select: ALL NONE

Thread 4 of 5
MESSAGE ACTIONS EXPAND ALL COLLAPSE ALL

2 Post(s) in this Thread 0 Unread 0 Unread Replies to Me

Adam Pullen 3 hours ago

The 2017 WannaCry attacks have since been attributed to the Lazarus Group; do
you think this could be considered a cyber terrorism event and why/why not?

Attributing the 2017 WannaCry attacks to the Lazarus Group raises essential questions about
whether this incident could be classified as cyber terrorism.
From a technical standpoint, the WannaCry attacks were devastating, causing widespread
disruption and financial damage across various sectors. The malware targeted critical
infrastructure, including healthcare systems and financial institutions, affecting millions of
individuals worldwide. However, whether these attacks constitute cyber terrorism depends on
the motives behind them.
Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta once remarked, "Cyber terrorism is the warfare of
the future." This statement underscores the potential for cyber attacks to inflict significant harm
and destabilize societies. While the Lazarus Group has been linked to state-sponsored cyber
operations, including those by North Korea, the primary objective of the WannaCry attacks
appears to have been financial gain rather than the promotion of political or ideological agendas
typically associated with cyber terrorism.
That said, the WannaCry attacks did share some characteristics with cyber terrorism, such as their
indiscriminate targeting and disruptive impact on critical infrastructure. However, without clear
evidence of political motives or intent to cause fear and panic, it may be more appropriate to
categorize these attacks as cyber crime rather than cyber terrorism.
In conclusion, while the WannaCry attacks were undoubtedly significant and emblematic of the
evolving cyber threat landscape, whether they constitute cyber terrorism hinges on the
perpetrators' underlying motives and objectives.

REPLY

Redwan Ahmed 1 hour ago

RE: The 2017 WannaCry attacks have since been attributed to the Lazarus Group;
do you think this could be considered a cyber terrorism event and why/why not?

Your analysis of the WannaCry attacks and their potential classification as cyber terrorism is well-
reasoned and thorough. You effectively explore both technical aspects and motives, providing a
nuanced perspective on a complex issue.
The inclusion of a quote from former U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta adds depth and
relevance to your discussion, connecting the events to broader discussions on the future of cyber
warfare. Your consideration of the Lazarus Group's potential state-sponsored affiliations and the
primary objective of financial gain contributes to a balanced examination of the incident.
Your conclusion succinctly summarizes the key points and emphasizes the importance of
understanding the perpetrators' motives in determining the nature of the attack. It reflects a
thoughtful and measured approach to a topic that involves intricate intersections of technology,
geopolitics, and criminal intent.
Overall, your write-up is well-crafted and informative. It contributes to a better understanding of

https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_72363_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&… 1/2
3/9/24, 9:58 PM Thread: The 2017 WannaCry attacks have since been attributed ...

the complexities surrounding cyber incidents and their classification and serves as an insightful
exploration of the blurred lines between cybercrime and cyber terrorism.

Select: ALL NONE

MESSAGE ACTIONS EXPAND ALL COLLAPSE ALL

← OK

https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_72363_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&… 2/2