Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15348458.2020.1777872
15348458.2020.1777872
To cite this article: Gang Zhu , Mary Rice , Guofang Li & Jinfei Zhu (2020): EFL Student
Teachers’ Professional Identity Construction: A Study of Student-Generated Metaphors
Before and After Student Teaching, Journal of Language, Identity & Education, DOI:
10.1080/15348458.2020.1777872
Article views: 11
ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
Metaphors are powerful windows to gain insight into EFL teachers’ professional EFL student teachers;
identity constructions. This study examined 33 Chinese EFL student teachers’ metaphor; professional
(STs) self-generated metaphors about teaching before and after their student identity; teaching practicum
teaching. Before their teaching practicum experience, they were: (a) optimistic,
but had naïve perceptions about their roles, (b) worried about their inadequacy
to teach professionally, and (c) anxious about their relationship with cooperat
ing teachers. Post-practicum, we noted (a) increased transformative percep
tions about their role, (b) professional knowledge growth, (c) the participants
explicated a broad array of challenges of building good student relationships,
and (d) the placement-school contexts exert a significant influence on their
identity formation. Implications for facilitating EFL student teachers’ profes
sional identity (trans)formations during the field experiences are discussed.
Introduction
International scholars recognize the importance of student teaching and other practicum for building
professional identities as student teachers (STs) learn to teach (e.g., Meijer et al., 2011; Russell, 2005;
Yuan, 2016; Zhu & Zhu, 2018). The primary purpose of these experiences in classrooms is to provide
prospective teachers opportunities to learn about their responsibilities for future teaching, develop
repertoires of pedagogies, and construct professional identities (Lawson et al., 2015). During their
practicum, STs might encounter a number of challenges, including the immediacy of classroom
practice, the needs of placement schools, and the expectations of school-based mentors and university
supervisors (Buckworth, 2017). However, these experiences are also imbued with multiple layers of
learning and uncertainty regarding the transition to teaching from an identity perspective (Valencia
et al., 2009). These identities are defined as ideal selves that teachers aspire to become (Brickhouse,
2001; Tatto et al., 2018). Thus, prospective teachers ask themselves not just “Who am I?,” but also
“Who am I as a teacher?”
However, it is not always easy to describe one’s identity. Metaphors provide an avenue to probe
teachers’ developing professional identities. As Sumsion (2002) argued, metaphors are “constructions
of meaning that encapsulate our current understandings while extending and expanding them” (p.
870). Teacher education researchers have long recognized the intimate relationship between meta
phors and teacher identity construction (Farrell, 2006; Pinnegar et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2010). Even
with this emerging research base using metaphors in teaching, these studies have focused only on one
metaphor of teacher identity at a specific point and time. While this is useful in some ways, it is also
limiting because professional identity, especially as prospective teachers are learning to teach, could be
more dynamic (Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Beijaard et al., 2004). Examining whether and how
CONTACT Gang Zhu tamugz-2016@tamu.edu Liberal Arts Building 1522, Institute of International and Comparative
Education, East China Normal University, China, 200062.
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 ZHU ET AL.
metaphors shift may provide insights into the professional identity transformation of prospective
teachers as they move from being a student to becoming a teacher.
Expecting that professional identity does exist at some level before student teaching and that it does
shift during the experience, we ask, How do EFL STs express their professional identities through
metaphors at the beginning and after their teaching practicums? To address this overarching question,
we formulate two sub-questions:
(1) What do EFL STs’ written metaphors reveal about their professional identities at the start of the
teaching practicums?
(2) What do EFL STs’ written metaphors reveal about their professional identities towards the end
of the teaching practicums?
a cogent venue for researchers to probe into its connotations, pedagogical implications, and its
relevance to professional identity construction.
Methodology
Contexts and participants
This study was conducted in a four-year university-based EFL teacher education program in Zhejiang
Province, Mainland China. The fourth author, the director of the EFL teacher education program of
this study, distributed the written instructions on metaphoric professional identity to 40 EFL pre
service teachers within the English language education department (see Appendix). Overall, 33 EFL
preservice teachers, who undertook their teaching practicums from Fall 2017 to Spring 2018, agreed to
participate in this research. The participation rate is 82.5%. Among these participants, seven were male
and 26 were female. Eleven of them were placed in public middle schools for their teaching practicum
and twenty-two in public high schools in China. To maintain high ethical standards, we received the
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval both from one research-intensive university in the U.S. and
the Chinese university where we recruited the participants. During the research process, the authors
maintained the confidentiality of the participants’ private information according to the negotiated
protocol.
Data collection
Journaling has been championed as an effective tool for deep reflection (Boud, 2001; Craig et al., 2015).
Accordingly, the first author collected 33 pieces of written narratives at the beginning and at the end of
the teaching practicums from Fall 2017 to Spring 2018. The written narratives are intended to capture
the critical events, meaning-oriented professional learning experience that occurred during the
teaching practicums. The participants were required to compose concrete examples to elucidate
their chosen metaphors. The first author then translated all the written metaphors and the accom
panying reflections into English. Subsequently, all of us iteratively analysed the written metaphors and
the resulting explanations.
Data analysis
The authors adopted the grounded theory and constant-comparative approach (Cohen et al., 2011;
Miles et al., 2014) to analyse the written metaphors and the supporting written reflections. Specifically,
the authors conducted the three-level data analysis in an inductive manner: codes (basic transcript
unit), categories (emerging patterns), and themes (the major domain of categories). Regarding the
meta-analysis, the complete data analysis process involved the following four steps (see Table 1).
Over the course of the data analysis, we coded the metaphors in a recursive and iterative manner to
increase the reliability of the study (Marshall & Rossman, 2014). Initially, the authors coded the
metaphors and the written reflections independently. In case of disagreements, we double-checked the
accuracy of the categorizing process to increase the inter-reliability rate of the project. In this study, the
percentage of discrepancies in the analysis of the data is 10%. Finally, we negotiated and resolved the
discrepancies generated in the process of metaphor analysis until a joint consensus was reached.
Findings
The metaphors provided valuable insights into the EFL STs’ changes in their metaphoric perceptions
regarding EFL teaching and the resulting complexities of teacher identity construction. These meta
phors embodied the convergence and divergence of internal/external contextual dynamics that shaped
participants’ professional identity construction during the practicums (see Table 2). Specifically, the
internal dynamics mainly arise from the STs’ professional agency, capabilities, and professional
relationships with the students. Meanwhile, the external dynamics come from the collective influence
of the EFL teacher education program, field placements, and the different style of mentorships.
language teachers. For instance, S5 depicted her professional identity as “sunflowers under the sun.” In
this metaphor, students are the sunflowers that grow under the light of the teacher’s care. S5 further
explained that everything English teachers do should revolve around students’ varying learning needs.
Similarly, S9 considered himself as “sunshine and rain,” and his expected responsibility was to “irrigate
the young saplings like how I was.” S9 assumed his efforts alone would make a difference in his students’
English learning. While well-intentioned, these two pastoral metaphors from S5 and S9 are examples of
naïve understandings about English language teachers’ roles. These metaphors put the teacher at the
centre of the learning experience, even though the participants did not seem to realize this.2
Regarding English language teachers’ responsibilities, S6 and S7 assumed that the overarching
responsibility of English language teachers was to focus on the act of instructing. Hence, S6 described
herself as “a frog in a well” because she had a very narrow understanding of what instructing involved.
S6 further specified that “I think my job is to make the English class interesting and actively engage the
students in English learning.” From her standpoint, instructing looked like entertaining, but she was
not sure if she could do it. Against the backdrop of test-driven culture, S6 did not realize that she had
to follow the national curriculum guide and all kinds of tests in the school.
Another instance where a student emphasized aspects of personality as instructional capability
came from S7, who used the metaphor of an eagle to describe her professional identity at the start of
the teaching practicum. From S7’s perspective, an eagle is active and independent but not gregarious.
In this sense, S7 said that her overarching goal in the teaching practicum was to make her English
classroom engaging and effective. In the case of both S6 and S7, their metaphors distance them from
the students in that they think they are supposed to entertain. S21 and S28 described themselves as “a
bird feeder” and “a beautiful Christmas tree,” respectively:
A teacher should design, prepare, and provide the English learning materials. In the classroom learning settings,
I delivered the pre-packaged contents to the students, which rendered the students passive over the course of
English learning.
I have many well-designed gifts, candies, and colourful ornaments that I would like to share. I am always looking
forward to the family that I would serve. I shall greet all the family members with my inborn mission as
a Christmas tree.
Although S21 desired to serve her students in ways that required her to be close to them, her
metaphors continue to place the teacher at the centre of the activity. In these metaphors, the teacher
appears to be the only one who has anything to give. In accordance with her metaphor, S21 narrowly
focused on English knowledge, preparation, and delivery, which eventually disengaged the students. In
a similar vein, S16 reflected on her initial identity perception as mentioned below:
At the beginning of student teaching, I likened myself to a trainer in a zoo. I worked as a head teacher (banzhuren,
班主任) during my teaching practicum. I was very strict with my students and did not communicate enough with
them. Therefore, I was a distant manager and created a hierarchy between me and the students. I did not reveal
my authentic emotions and personality. Regarding my first-time English teaching, the students did not actively
participate in my classroom discussions.
S16 used the metaphor of a zoo keeper or trainer, which shows the same trend regarding students as
mentioned earlier. She is the person in charge. She was a distance manager. There is a hierarchy
wherein she is the giver and the students are the takers, and as part of the contract, they should accept
her will. When prospective teachers think of metaphors such as these, they can either retain these
metaphors or shed them in favour of more sociocultural definitions of teaching, which considers
teaching as a cultural activity in an interactive milieu.
Fear of inadequacy of professional capability in teaching. At the beginning of the teaching
practicum, S1 described herself as “a lonely shepherd.” To elaborate, S1 acknowledged that she was not
well prepared to assume the responsibility of an English language teacher. It was hard to develop
repertoires of pedagogies and routines. Meanwhile, S1 lacked the necessary professional support from
the placement school. Consequently, S1 stated:
8 ZHU ET AL.
I think I am a lonely shepherd. No one in the placement school understands my investment. I felt helpless when
I faced the students in the classroom, and I did not garner recognition from the students.
In this metaphor, the shepherd is with the students, albeit at their head. While it is positive that the
prospective teachers understood the seriousness of their obligations as teachers of young people, it is
unfortunate that their metaphors still focused on their learning as a student rather than on their
teaching.
In a similar fashion, S8 considered herself a “medium-cooked steak”; she had the basic qualification
for teaching but was too naïve. S8 said that the three-year teacher education coursework only enabled
her to forge her basic English teaching ability (i.e., how to design an English class with clear objectives
and vigour) and learn about the responsibilities of head-teachers (i.e., work as a bridge between the
head-teacher and the students). However, she lacked the confidence to consider herself a “well-
performing” teacher; instead, she wanted to be a student. S13 said she was“a nestling” at the beginning
of the teaching practicum:
After observing my cooperating teacher’s open class (a type of professional teacher development routine in
Chinese K-12 schools) on reading English newspapers, I came up with some innovative ideas on how to design
my English classroom instruction. On discussing them with my cooperating teacher, she said that my proposed
teaching activities were instrumental for igniting the classroom atmosphere but inhibited attaining the teaching
objective.
S13 realized that she looked like “a nestling.” Many of her teaching activities were not mature, and she
had a strong sense of lack of pedagogical knowledge. With the support of her cooperating teacher, S13
grew professionally, but continued to have limited confidence in her teaching ability. Similarly, S19
and S20 felt inadequate as STs. S19 chose “rookie” as her metaphorical identity and admitted:
It was my first encounter with students and the podium. As expected, I was nervous and had no idea what to do.
S24 chose “cocoon”to describe her initial professional identity. She found it challenging to integrate
theory and practice:
I mainly learned theory in the university. However, amidst the student teaching, I had to integrate theory and
practice. I felt like I was restricted in a cocoon because everything was covered in shells.
Some students found themselves stifled as they worked to apply their knowledge. S30 used the
metaphor of “a yacht without the propelling power of the wind” to describe her sense of powerlessness
and disorientation:
At the beginning of the teaching practicum, I was in a state of passivity. I did not understand the new teaching life.
Sometimes, I waited for the wind to stir me up and push me forward.
As shown in these examples, many STs’ beginning metaphors were mainly focused on themselves
rather than on their students. Their concerns varied from how they were going to provide students
what they thought they needed, to whether they would be recognized as a teacher.
Negotiating the professional relationship with the cooperating teacher and the student. Due to
the short teaching period, STs find it challenging to build a professional relationship with their
mentors and with their students, which confirms the previous conclusion (Deng et al., 2018).
Regarding the fragile and sometimes uneasy mentorship, S2 used the metaphor of “a clumsy parrot”
to elucidate her professional identity:
Most of the time, I observed my cooperating teacher’s instruction in the classroom. While communicating with
my cooperating teacher, I always followed the suggestions offered by her/him rather than confidently express my
personal opinions on teaching.
S2 felt that she was like “a clumsy parrot” in the Chinese sociocultural context; she only repeats what
others say without expressing her own opinions in teaching. Similarly, S12 was in a situation where her
cooperating teachers adopted the metaphor of “the little monk just down the hill” to describe her
professional identity:
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, IDENTITY & EDUCATION 9
Atthe first meeting with my cooperating teacher, she opposed my unsuitable dressing style. She asked me to dress
more formally as a teacher. On the second day, I changed my dressing style. From this experience, I learned that
teaching practicum enables preservice teachers to experience teaching jobs authentically. I need to position
myself as an adult.
This quote demonstrates that S12 lacked the necessary understanding about the social norms of the
community that she entered. By a similar token, S27 shared the following:
I was nervous when I learned that my mentor teacher was the head of the English teaching and research group.
I thought she was strict. To make things worse, I was not good at interpersonal communication. Overall, I felt
burdensome at the beginning of the student teaching.
Such narratives as these suggested that STs positioned their cooperating teachers as mentors rather
than as colleagues. They gave these mentors considerable authority in guiding them through the
practicum experience.
Regarding their professional relationship with the students, the participants acknowledged that it
was difficult to fit in the placement schools. As S32 reflected:
In fact, I looked more like a transfer student and a member of the classroom community. I studied with them
toward one communal direction—to build a better learning community. The students felt very strange on seeing
me as a “student teacher” during the initial student teaching period.
S32 specified that when she first entered the placement school, she was unfamiliar with the students
there. Consequently, it was an arduous task to become an authentic community member in the
placement school.
understand for ordinary people. From S12’s perspective, “elegant art and literature” exemplifies that
S12 has developed an idealistic professional identity by the end of the teaching practicum, which does
not necessarily fit the context of the placement school. Specifically, S12 said that she had paid excessive
attention to classroom teaching skills at the cost of ignoring after-school tutoring and facilitating
homework. S12 reflected now that these after-school teaching activities are also a constitutive part of
the teaching practicum:
[For] English teaching in China, EFL teachers should work as learning facilitators, which is in accordance with
my cooperating teacher’s pedagogies. However, I was very teacher-centred and traditional during the teaching
practicum.
S32 chose “student union president” to describe her transformative professional identity after the
teaching practicum:
After a two-month student teaching stint, I gradually found that teachers should play a larger role. A teacher is
not only a student’s friend and a member of the classroom community, but also a manager, an organizer, and
a servant. As head teacher, I should first guarantee that my class runs smoothly, ensuring efficient classroom
dynamics, morning reading, physical exercise, and rest.
In these metaphors and their explanations, STs expressed the understanding and awareness they had
gained of the various teaching responsibilities.
Professional knowledge growth in student teaching. While most of the students expressed
a feeling of success using metaphors, not all did so. S9 felt that he was “a gust of wind” after the
practicum—he could not make a real change in English teaching and only offered students support
when necessary. The STs’ professional growth centred on EFL pedagogy refinement and practical
knowledge development. S3 called herself “half a bucket of running water.” S3 explained this metaphor
from the Chinese idiom describing the role of teachers:
If a teacher wants to give a student a glass of water, he or she must possess a bucket of water.
In this sense, S3 admitted that she was inadequate for the teaching profession, considering her ill-
prepared professional knowledge and skills. S3 further reflected that to be a qualified English teacher
and teach the students in a better way, she needed to continually refine her professional competency.
As another example, S4 described himself as “bamboo sprouts after the rain” after he finished his
teaching practicum. This metaphor suggeststhat S4 experienced professional growth through the
teaching practicum. Specifically, S4 shared that he had undergone a “whole-persona education.” S4
also stipulated that he had become a reflective practitioner through continuously reflecting on his
classroom instructional goals, teaching activity designs, and instructional implementations.
S10 said she became “a young eagle in a hot air balloon” after two months of English teaching.
Specifically, S10 believed that she had accumulated more practical experiences compared to other
college students. Yet, she was less experienced than the formal teachers in the placement schools.
Regarding the hot air balloon metaphor, S10 clarified that she was now eligible for a teaching job that
required only a two-month teaching practicum experience. The teaching practicum experience
seemed to her like “a hot air balloon” that could take her to a new world.
The pedagogical orientation changing from more behaviourist to more constructivist. Some
STs shifted from behaviourist to constructivist orientations. Compared with her initial “bird feeder”
metaphor, S21 selected “road guide” to illustrate the change in her professional identity formation
after the English teaching practice:
After my student teaching, I realized that an English teacher needs to be a road guide. While guiding the students,
I should point the direction, provide necessary materials, and support the students whenever unexpected issues
occur. Learning is essentially a process of discovery, and teachers should guide students on their path of discovery
in the forest. This way, I can cultivate passion for learning among students.
Similarly, S24’s metaphors changed from “a cocoon” to “a butterfly” with respect to her professional
identity construction after the student teaching experience:
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, IDENTITY & EDUCATION 11
Regarding the change in my teaching philosophy, I would not only observe and learn from experienced teachers’
research-informed classroom instructions, but also integrate the cutting-edge theories that I learned from the
university coursework. When I designed my lesson plans, I take the students’ backgrounds into consideration,
rehearse my lessons, and teach students how to learn.
In other words, doing teaching work made students feel like teachers over time. Although not all the
metaphors reflect a radical transformation, the explanations of their metaphors showed a development
towards more sophisticated teaching.
Building relationships with students and their parents. When STs moved to more constructivist
perspectives, they became more concerned about building positive relationships with students and
their parents. When these relationships did not run smoothly, they caused distress to the STs. As S33
explained, she found it challenging to gain recognition from the parents:
Whether you are a novice teacher or a student teacher, it was always difficult to earn parents’ trust. Chinese
parents always assume that it was challenging for their children to achieve a higher academic performance in
unexperienced teachers’ classrooms. As a result, parents often distrust STs.
This alienation hindered the professional identity construction of the STs, as S27 mentioned:
On many occasions, I found I had to express my affection carefully. On the one hand, I wanted the students to
know that I cared about them. On the other hand, I was afraid that they would take advantage of my affection.
As noted, S27’s dilemma was how to keep an appropriate emotional distance with her students in the
practicum school.
The contextual influence of the placement school. A few STs also addressed the contextual
influence of the placement school on their professional identity transformation. In this section, S8
considered herself “a three-medium cooked steak”—mature and green simultaneously:
The placement school where I practiced my teaching emphasized students’ English test scores and high school
attendance. Under the circumstance, I had to give up my communicative English class that foregrounds students’
well-rounded development. Finally, I had to cater to test-oriented teaching—mechanical English grammar
practice and intensive test preparation.
As a head-teacher, S11 had to monitor students’ morning exercise, noon-breaks, and evening self-
study. S11 reflected on his post-practicum experience as mentioned below:
Apart from classroom teaching routines, I had to arrange students’ seats, organize classroom activities, and settle
the disputes among students. Frequently, I did not have enough weekend or holiday rests.
S11 therefore considered student teaching “a permanent revolving gyro” because of the external
pressures arising from the placement school and from his mission as an EFL teacher. In the case of
S7, the metaphor of “a wild goose” was used after the teaching practicum. Geese emphasize group
interests and normally migrate in flocks. S7 forged her personal fixed daily English teaching routi
neand found that her teaching mindset had to some extent become solidified and isolated. She
perceived that her English teaching style had become disintegrated with her colleagues in the field
placement.
Discussion
Through an examination of the metaphors they used about themselves before and after their teaching
practicum, this study aimed to learn about how EFL STs’ perceptions of themselves as teachers evolve.
Although STs’ professional identities, which were shaped long before they commenced their profes
sional experiences, might position them well on their career trajectory or place unrealistic expectations
on themselves and the surroundings. This study has demonstrated that metaphors act as a powerful
lens to understand STs’ tactic referential systems and serve as “filters” through which teachers can
clarify their own teaching practices (Saban, 2006). In this study, metaphors were constructed as
psychological modelling experiences, allowing reification of teachers’ prior experiences, leading to
12 ZHU ET AL.
new forms of conceptual knowledge. They also reduced teachers’ complex educational philosophies
and actions into comprehensible images (Martı́nez et al., 2001).
This inquiry revealed that there was a shift in the metaphors used by EFL STs to describe themselves
within the context of their work during their practicum assignments. Further, the shifts generally
reflected a more complex and sophisticated understanding, albeit a still emerging understanding of
their roles and responsibilities in teaching young people and displaying their own expertise. In this
study, the participating EFL STs transformed their perceptions about English language teachers’ roles
and responsibilities and continually cultivated their professional knowledge in student teaching.
Meanwhile, the post-practicum metaphors depicted shifts in pedagogical orientation changing from
more behaviourist to more constructivist. They also demonstrated identity ruptures and reconfigura
tions arising from the realization that they had to engage relationally with students and that these
relationships would require considerable effort on their part. All these changes support previous
conclusions from other research that STs’ professional identity is dynamic across a multitude of
professional contexts, especially in this uncertain learning-to-teach setting (Schultz & Ravitch, 2013;
Zhu, 2017b).
facilitating STs’ professional development (Meijer, 2011). In practice, teacher educators might
consider how STs can re-examine the beliefs underpinning their identity perceptions and further
modify their course of actions without losing confidence in their ability to teach (Yuan & Mak,
2018).
Conclusion
As English instruction continues to grow and evolve in international contexts, it is important to
develop a sophisticated repertoire of strategies for helping teachers develop their identities as
teachers and to accurately perceive their strengths and needs as beginning teachers (Zhu & Zhu,
2018). This study provided a glimpse into the thinking of Chinese EFL teachers before and after
their practicum assignment. The metaphors used are eloquent and interesting glimpses into these
teachers’ feelings about themselves as they participated in the learn-to-teach process. For future
research direction, it is advisable to conduct a longitudinal study on the evolution of the metaphors
used by these participants.
Note
1. In this paper, cooperating teachers are school-based mentors. In some literature, cooperating teacher and school-
based mentors are used interchangeably. In the Chinese educational context, cooperating teachers are usually
experienced teachers who teach one specific subject, such as Chinese language, mathematics, and English. In the
context of teaching practicum, cooperating teachers supervised student teachers’ lesson plans, pedagogical skills,
and other professional responsibilities in the field placements.
2. A frog in a well is a Chinese idiom that describes a situation in which individuals cannot see the big picture
because of their narrow minds.
14 ZHU ET AL.
ORCID
Gang Zhu http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-8424
Mary Rice http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-512X
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011a). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2),
132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011b). Learning at the boundary: An introduction. International Journal of Educational
Research, 50(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.002
Alger, C. (2009). Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.004
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.
4324/9781410617286
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and
implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/
03057640902902252
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2011). New teachers’ identity shifts at the boundary of teacher education and initial
practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.003
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Education, 90(90), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.16
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 38(3), 282–295
Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press.
Buckworth, J. (2017). Issues in the teaching practicum. In G. Geng, P. Smith, & P. Black (Eds.), The challenge of teaching:
Through the eyes of preservice teachers (pp. 9–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2571-6
Chen, D. (2003). A classification system for metaphors about teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance, 74(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2003.10608375
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
Craig, C. J., Zou, Y., & Poimbeauf, R. (2015). Journal writing as a way to know culture: Insights from a travel study
abroad program. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.968894
Deng, L., Zhu, G., Li, G., Xu, Z., Rutter, A., & Rivera, H. (2018). Student teachers’ emotions, dilemmas, and professional
identity formation in the teaching practicums. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s40299-018-0404-3
Erickson, B., & Pinnegar, S. (2017). Consequences of personal teaching metaphors for teacher identity and practice.
Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203774
Farrell, S. (2006). ‘The teacher is an octopus’: Uncovering preservice English language teachers’ prior beliefs through
metaphor analysis. RELC Journal, 37(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206067430
Gilmore, L. (1994). Autobiographics: A feminist theory of women’s self-representation. Cornell University Press.
Hong, J., Day, C., & Greene, B. (2018). The construction of early career teachers’ identities: Coping or managing?
Teacher Development, 22(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1403367
Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers’ professional identity. British Educational Research Journal,
39(4), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2012.679614
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching practicum: A systematic review.
European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.994060
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological analysis. University of Chicago.
Ma, X., & Gao, X. (2017). Metaphors used by preservice teachers of Chinese as an international language. Journal of
Education for Teaching, 43(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1182372
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Martı́nez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9
Meijer, P. C. (2011). The role of crisis in the development of student teachers’ professional identity. In A. Lauriala,
R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo, & O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä (Eds.), Navigating in educational contexts: Identities and cultures in
dialogue (pp. 41–54). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-522-2_3
Meijer, P. C., De Graaf, G., & Meirink, J. (2011). Key experiences in student teachers’ development. Teachers and
Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.538502
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, IDENTITY & EDUCATION 15
Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Nghia, T., & Tai, H. (2017). Preservice teachers’ identity development during the teaching internship. Australian Journal
of Teacher Education, 42(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n8.1
Nguyen, C. (2016). Metaphors as a window into identity: A study of teachers of English to young learners in Vietnam.
System, 60, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.004
Oxford, L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors
about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3–50. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7
Patchen, T., & Crawford, T. (2011). From gardeners to tour guides: The epistemological struggle revealed in
teacher-generated metaphors of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0022487110396716
Pinnegar, S., Mangelson, J., Reed, M., & Groves, S. (2011). Exploring preservice teachers’ metaphor plotlines. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 27(3), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.002
Russell, T. (2005). Using the practicum in preservice teacher education programs: Strengths and weaknesses of
alternative assumptions about the experiences of learning to teach. In F. Hoban (Ed.), The missing links in teacher
education design: Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework (pp. 135–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/
1-4020-3346-X_8
Saban, A. (2004). Prospective classroom teachers’ metaphorical images of selves and comparing them to those they have
of their elementary and cooperating teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 617–635.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.03.003
Saban, A. (2006). Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay. Teaching Education, 17(4),
299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601017386
Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed
through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.
003
Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2013). Narratives of learning to teach: Taking on professional identities. Journal of Teacher
Education, 64(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112458801
Sumsion, J. (2002). Becoming, being and unbecoming an early childhood educator: A phenomenological case study of
teacher attrition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00048-3
Tatto, M. T., Burn, K., Menter, I., Mutton, T., & Thompson, I. (2018). Learning to teach in England and the United States:
The evolution of policy and practice. Routledge.
Teng, F. (2017). Emotional development and construction of teacher identity: Narrative interactions about the
preservice teachers’ practicum experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 117. https://doi.org/
10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.8
Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007
Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8),
1563–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.008
Trent, J. (2018). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘being different’? Integration, separation, and identity construction during a teaching
practicum in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 22(4), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1466722
Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost
opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109336543
Yan, C., & He, C. (2015). ‘We are left in limbo!’: Chinese EFL student teachers’ teaching practicum experience. Frontiers
of Education in China, 10(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-004-015-0016-5
Yuan, E. R. (2016). The dark side of mentoring on pre-service language teachers’ identity formation. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 55, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.012
Yuan, R., & Mak, P. (2018). Reflective learning and identity construction in practice, discourse and activity: Experiences
of pre-service language teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.tate.2018.05.009
Zhao, H., Coombs, S., & Zhou, X. (2010). Developing professional knowledge about teachers through metaphor
research: Facilitating a process of change. Teacher Development, 14(3), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/
10476210601017386
Zhu, G. (2017a). “Traditional teaching method still holds water.” Narrative inquiry of student teachers’ professional
identities at the intersections of teacher knowledge and subject matter knowledge. In E. Chan, D. Keyes, & V. Ross
(Eds.), Intersections of teacher knowledge and subject matter knowledge: Narrative approaches at the crossroads of the
classroom (pp. 225–247). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720160000028018
Zhu, G. (2017b). Chinese student teachers’ perspectives on becoming a teacher in the practicums: Emotional and ethical
dimensions of identity shaping. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(4), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.
2017.1341162
16 ZHU ET AL.
Zhu, G., Iglesia, P., & Wang, K. (2020). Examining Chinese and Spanish preservice teachers’ practicum experiences: A
transformative learning perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/
02607476.2019.1708623
Zhu, J., & Zhu, G. (2018). Understanding student teachers’ professional identity transformation through metaphor: An
international perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(4), 500–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.
1450819