Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

OPEN ACCESS
Computer Science & IT Research Journal
P-ISSN: 2709-0043, E-ISSN: 2709-0051
Volume 5, Issue 3, P.671-680, March 2024
DOI: 10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.927
Fair East Publishers
Journal Homepage: www.fepbl.com/index.php/csitrj

LEVERAGING QUANTUM COMPUTING FOR INCLUSIVE AND

RESPONSIBLE AI DEVELOPMENT: A CONCEPTUAL AND
REVIEW FRAMEWORK

Temidayo Olorunsogo1, Boma Sonimiteim Jacks2, & Olakunle Abayomi Ajala3

1
Independent Researcher, Colorado, USA
2
Independent Researcher, Nigeria
3
Indiana Wesleyan University, USA
_______________________________________________________________________________
*Corresponding Author: Temidayo Olorunsogo
Corresponding Author Email: temi.olorunsogo@colorado.edu
Article Received: 10-01-24 Accepted: 01-03-24 Published: 22-03-24

Licensing Details: Author retains the right of this article. The article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License
(http://www.creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction
and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified
on the Journal open access page
_______________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a novel conceptual framework that integrates the advanced capabilities of
quantum computing to address the urgent need for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence
(AI) development. It reviews current challenges in AI, such as bias, lack of inclusivity, and the
computational limitations faced by classical computing methods in solving complex societal
problems. By harnessing quantum computing, this framework aims to overcome these barriers,
enabling faster, more efficient AI solutions that are ethically grounded and universally accessible.
By adopting a holistic approach that integrates technical innovation with ethical considerations and
stakeholder engagement, we believe that quantum computing can serve as a catalyst for the
development of AI technologies that are not only more advanced but also more inclusive,
responsible, and beneficial for society as a whole. This concept paper serves as a foundational

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 671

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

framework for further research, collaboration, and action in the intersection of quantum computing
and AI, with the ultimate goal of harnessing the transformative potential of these technologies to
address pressing societal challenges and promote human well-being.
Keywords: Quantum Computing, AI, Development, Responsible.
_______________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The rapid advancement of AI technologies has underscored the importance of ethical
considerations and the potential for societal impact (Cova, et al., 2022; Pagano, et al., 2023).
However, the development of AI has also faced significant challenges, including biases in
algorithmic decision-making, accessibility issues, and the computational limitations of classical
computing systems (Domingo-Ferrer, et al., 2019; Andrew, and Karthikeyan, 2019).
These challenges necessitate a rethinking of AI development methodologies, with an emphasis on
inclusivity, responsibility, and the utilization of emerging technologies such as quantum
computing (Hagerty, and Rubinov, 2019; Hastuti, 2023; Konda, 2022).
In recent years, the fields of quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as
two of the most transformative and rapidly advancing areas of technological innovation. Quantum
computing, with its unparalleled ability to perform complex calculations at speeds far beyond the
reach of classical computers, holds the promise of revolutionizing numerous industries and
scientific disciplines (Aithal, 2023; Metawei, et al., 2022). Similarly, AI technologies, fueled by
vast amounts of data and sophisticated algorithms, are reshaping the way we interact with
technology, conduct business, and address societal challenges. As these two fields continue to
progress independently, there is a growing recognition of the potential synergies that could arise
from their convergence (Oriji, et al., 2023). The integration of quantum computing with AI has the
potential to unlock new frontiers of computational power and intelligence, enabling the
development of AI systems that are not only more capable but also more efficient, adaptive, and
context-aware (Bughin, et al 2017; Chui, 2017).
However, as we stand on the precipice of this technological revolution, it is imperative that we
approach the development and deployment of quantum-powered AI with a keen awareness of the
ethical, social, and economic implications involved. While the potential benefits of these
technologies are vast, there are also significant risks and challenges to consider, including issues of
fairness, transparency, privacy, and bias. Moreover, there is a pressing need to ensure that the
benefits of quantum-powered AI are accessible to all individuals and communities, regardless of
background, identity, or geographical location. As AI continues to permeate various aspects of
society, it is essential to guard against the exacerbation of existing inequalities and disparities, and
instead, strive to create AI systems that are inclusive, equitable, and beneficial for all. In light of
these considerations, this concept paper proposes a conceptual and review framework for
leveraging quantum computing to advance the development of AI in a manner that is both
inclusive and responsible (Fosch-Villaronga, and Poulsen, 2022). By integrating technical
innovation with ethical considerations, stakeholder engagement, and policy frameworks, we aim to
foster the creation of AI technologies that not only push the boundaries of what is possible but also
uphold fundamental principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability (Monlezun, 2023).

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 672

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

Through a multidisciplinary approach that brings together researchers, policymakers, industry

stakeholders, and the broader public, we seek to chart a path forward for the responsible and
ethical development of quantum-powered AI. By leveraging the transformative potential of
quantum computing in service of human well-being and societal progress, we aspire to shape a
future where AI technologies empower individuals, strengthen communities, and contribute to a
more just and equitable world (How, and Cheah, 2024; Aithal, 2023).
In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, the convergence of quantum computing and
artificial intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges. This concept paper
proposes a strategic framework for leveraging quantum computing to advance the development of
AI in a manner that is both inclusive and responsible (De Leon, et al., 2021; Córcoles, et al., 2019;
Ayeni, et al., 2024). The integration of quantum computing promises revolutionary advancements
in computational power and efficiency, offering the potential to solve complex problems that are
currently intractable for classical computing systems (Nofer, et al., 2023; Pal, 2023). However, as
AI continues to permeate various aspects of society, concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and
ethical decision-making have become increasingly prominent. This paper seeks to address these
concerns by providing a comprehensive conceptual and review framework that emphasizes
inclusivity and responsibility in AI development (Wong, 2020; Rai, 2022). By harnessing the
unique capabilities of quantum computing, such as quantum parallelism and entanglement, we aim
to foster the creation of AI systems that are not only more powerful and efficient but also more
equitable and ethically sound (Whittlestone, et al., 2019; Cockburn, et al., 2018).
Literature Review
The societal impact of artificial intelligence (AI) has been a topic of increasing concern and
scrutiny in recent years. Numerous studies have highlighted the ethical, legal, and socio-economic
implications of AI deployment across various domains (Stahl, and Leach, 2023; Taeihagh, 2021).
Ethically, AI systems raise concerns regarding bias, fairness, and accountability. Research has
demonstrated how algorithms can perpetuate and even amplify existing social biases, leading to
discriminatory outcomes in areas such as hiring, lending, and criminal justice. Moreover, the lack
of transparency and explainability in AI decision-making processes exacerbates these issues,
undermining trust and accountability (Lima, et al., 2024; von Eschenbach, 2021; von Eschenbach,
2021). Legally, the rapid advancement of AI has outpaced the development of regulatory
frameworks, raising questions about liability, privacy, and intellectual property rights. The
emergence of autonomous systems, such as self-driving cars and drones, poses new challenges for
existing legal frameworks, requiring adaptation to ensure public safety and consumer protection.
Socio-economically, AI has the potential to disrupt labor markets, exacerbate inequality, and
reshape industries. While AI technologies hold the promise of increased productivity and
efficiency, there are concerns about job displacement, particularly in low-skilled and routine tasks.
Moreover, the concentration of AI development in a few dominant companies raises questions
about market competition and economic concentration (Imre, 2014). Existing frameworks for
responsible AI seek to address these challenges by promoting principles of fairness, transparency,
accountability, and inclusivity. However, there are notable gaps in these frameworks, particularly
regarding inclusivity and fairness. Research has shown that AI systems often fail to account for

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 673

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to inequitable outcomes for marginalized groups
(Baumgartne, et al., 2023). Additionally, there is a lack of diversity in the AI workforce, limiting
the range of voices and perspectives shaping AI development (Shams, et al., 2023).
Quantum computing offers unprecedented potential to revolutionize computational capabilities,
with the ability to solve problems that are currently intractable for classical computers (Marella,
and Parisa, 2020; Weigold, M, et al., 2021). Quantum principles such as superposition and
entanglement enable the processing of vast amounts of data in parallel, leading to exponential
speedups in certain algorithms (Ramezani, et al., 2020; Jozsa, and Linden, 2003; Rieffel, and
Polak, 2000). Current research directions in quantum computing focus on improving qubit
coherence and scalability, developing error correction techniques, and exploring novel quantum
algorithms. In particular, the integration of quantum computing with AI holds promise for
enhancing machine learning algorithms, optimization problems, and simulation tasks (Brooks
2012; Pal, 2023).
Despite the potential benefits, combining AI with quantum computing presents significant
challenges. Technical challenges include the development of quantum algorithms robust to noise
and errors, the integration of quantum hardware with classical systems, and the scaling of quantum
computing resources. Ethical challenges center around issues of fairness, transparency, and
accountability in quantum-powered AI systems. The opacity of quantum algorithms and the
potential for unintended biases pose risks for equitable decision-making. Moreover, the complexity
of quantum systems raises questions about regulatory oversight and accountability mechanisms.
Implementation challenges include the accessibility and affordability of quantum computing
resources, the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between AI and quantum experts, and the
development of standards and best practices for quantum-powered AI development.
Interdisciplinary efforts and case studies demonstrate both the potential benefits and pitfalls of
leveraging quantum computing for AI development. While quantum-powered AI has shown
promise in certain applications, such as optimization and cryptography, there are challenges to
overcome before widespread adoption can occur.
The integration of AI and quantum computing holds great promise for advancing technological
capabilities and addressing complex societal challenges. However, addressing the ethical,
technical, and implementation challenges will require interdisciplinary collaboration, robust
regulatory frameworks, and a commitment to principles of inclusivity and fairness (Konda, 2022;
Li, 2023).
Problem Statement
Current AI development practices often overlook the importance of inclusivity and responsibility,
leading to the perpetuation of biases and exclusion of underrepresented groups. Moreover, the
complex nature of societal problems requires computational capabilities beyond what classical
computing can offer. This paper identifies the need for a framework that not only addresses these
challenges but also leverages the untapped potential of quantum computing to revolutionize AI
development.
Objectives
The objectives of this concept paper are as follows:

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 674

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

i. Conduct a comprehensive examination of the potential synergies between quantum

computing and artificial intelligence, identifying opportunities for leveraging quantum
principles to enhance AI capabilities.
ii. Propose a conceptual framework that integrates principles of inclusivity, fairness,
transparency, and accountability into the development and deployment of quantum-
powered AI systems.
iii. Evaluate current frameworks for responsible AI development, identifying gaps in
inclusivity, fairness, and ethical considerations, and propose enhancements to ensure
alignment with quantum-powered AI technologies.
iv. Identify and analyze the technical, ethical, and implementation challenges associated with
leveraging quantum computing for AI development, proposing strategies and best practices
to mitigate risks and maximize benefits.
v. Facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers,
policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the public to promote informed decision-making
and responsible AI development practices.
Expected Outcome
The expected outcome of this concept paper is to provide a comprehensive conceptual and review
framework for leveraging quantum computing for inclusive and responsible AI development.
Specifically, the anticipated outcomes include:
i. A Conceptual Framework for Responsible AI Development: A well-defined conceptual
framework that outlines principles, guidelines, and best practices for developing and
deploying quantum-powered AI systems that are inclusive, fair, transparent, and
accountable.
ii. Identification of Gaps and Opportunities: Identification of gaps in existing frameworks for
responsible AI development and opportunities for enhancing inclusivity, fairness, and
ethical considerations in the context of quantum-powered AI technologies.
iii. Insights into Technical and Ethical Challenges: Insights into the technical, ethical, and
implementation challenges associated with combining AI with quantum computing, along
with proposed strategies and solutions to address these challenges.
iv. Promotion of Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Promotion of interdisciplinary
collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers, policymakers, industry
stakeholders, and the public to foster a shared understanding of the societal implications of
quantum-powered AI and promote responsible development practices.
Overall, the expected outcome of this concept paper is to provide a roadmap for harnessing the
transformative potential of quantum computing to advance the development of AI technologies
that are not only more powerful and efficient but also more inclusive, fair, and beneficial for
society as a whole.
Conceptual Framework
The Quantum-Enhanced AI Development Process outlines a step-by-step methodology for
integrating quantum computing into AI development, with a focus on enhancing speed, efficiency,
and problem-solving capabilities. This process leverages the unique properties of quantum

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 675

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

computing, such as superposition and entanglement, to enable quantum-enhanced algorithms that

can tackle complex problems more effectively than classical approaches.
i. Problem Formulation:
Define the problem statement and objectives of the AI system development. Identify the
specific tasks or challenges that could benefit from quantum computing enhancements, such as
optimization, simulation, or pattern recognition.
ii. Quantum Algorithm Design
Explore existing quantum algorithms or develop new algorithms tailored to the problem
domain. Leverage quantum principles to design algorithms that exploit superposition and
entanglement to perform computations in parallel, leading to exponential speedups compared
to classical approaches.
iii. Quantum Computing Implementation:
Select suitable quantum computing platforms or technologies for algorithm implementation,
considering factors such as qubit coherence, error rates, and scalability. Develop or adapt
quantum circuits or software implementations of the chosen algorithms for execution on
quantum hardware.
iv. Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computation:
Integrate quantum-enhanced algorithms with classical AI techniques to leverage the strengths
of both approaches. Design hybrid quantum-classical algorithms that offload computationally
intensive tasks to quantum processors while utilizing classical resources for preprocessing,
post-processing, and optimization.
v. Evaluation and Optimization:
Evaluate the performance of quantum-enhanced AI models using appropriate metrics, such as
accuracy, speed, and resource utilization. Iteratively optimize the algorithms and parameters
based on feedback to enhance performance and address any limitations or bottlenecks.
vi. Ethical and Inclusive Design Principles
The Ethical and Inclusive Design Principles provide guidelines for embedding ethical
considerations and inclusivity at every stage of AI development, leveraging quantum
computing's capabilities to enhance fairness and accessibility. Fairness and Bias Mitigation:
Incorporate fairness-aware design principles to mitigate biases in data, algorithms, and
decision-making processes. Use quantum-enhanced algorithms to explore a broader range of
potential solutions and identify biases that may be overlooked by classical approaches.
vii. Transparency and Explainability:
Ensure transparency in AI systems by providing clear explanations of decision-making
processes and outcomes. Leverage quantum computing's ability to explore multiple pathways
simultaneously to enhance explainability and interpretability of AI models. Privacy
Preservation:
Implement privacy-preserving techniques to protect sensitive data and uphold individual
privacy rights. Explore quantum cryptography and secure multiparty computation to enable
privacy-preserving AI applications without compromising data confidentiality. Accessibility
and Inclusivity:

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 676

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

Design AI systems with accessibility features that accommodate diverse user needs and
preferences. Use quantum-enhanced algorithms to improve resource efficiency and reduce
computational barriers, making AI technologies more accessible to individuals with limited
computing resources.
viii. Stakeholder Engagement and Accountability:
Foster collaboration and engagement with diverse stakeholders, including communities
affected by AI technologies. Establish mechanisms for accountability and oversight to ensure
responsible use of quantum-powered AI systems and mitigate potential harms.
ix. Collaborative Ecosystem:
Proposal for a multidisciplinary collaboration framework, bringing together technologists,
ethicists, policymakers, and community stakeholders to ensure AI technologies are developed
in alignment with societal values.
By integrating the Quantum-Enhanced AI Development Process with Ethical and Inclusive Design
Principles, developers can create AI systems that not only push the boundaries of computational
capabilities but also uphold fundamental principles of fairness, transparency, and accessibility for
all users.
Implementation Strategy
Strategies for integrating quantum computing technologies into existing AI development pipelines,
including technical infrastructure, skill development, and research collaboration.
Recommendations for policy frameworks and governance models that support responsible and
inclusive AI development, facilitated by quantum computing advancements. Methods for engaging
with diverse communities to ensure their needs are addressed. Development of impact
measurement metrics to assess the social benefits of quantum-enhanced AI applications.
The implementation strategy is a comprehensive plan designed to translate the conceptual
framework into practical actions. It involves forming multidisciplinary task forces, conducting
research, developing ethical guidelines, engaging with industry and communities, fostering
collaboration, capacity building, monitoring progress, advocating for policy changes, and
continuously improving strategies based on feedback and evolving needs. By executing this
strategy, stakeholders aim to promote the responsible development of AI technologies that
prioritize inclusivity, fairness, transparency, and accountability, ultimately benefiting society while
upholding ethical principles.
CONCLUSION
The proposed framework aims to catalyze a shift towards more responsible and inclusive AI
development by leveraging the transformative potential of quantum computing. It calls for
interdisciplinary collaboration, policy innovation, and community engagement to ensure AI
technologies serve as tools for positive societal change.

Future Work
Directions for future research include the technical development of quantum algorithms for AI,
empirical studies on the social impact of quantum-enhanced AI applications, and the evolution of
ethical frameworks to guide this emerging field.

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 677

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

This concept and review paper serves as both a call to action and a foundational guide for
researchers, policymakers, and practitioners interested in shaping the future of AI towards a more
inclusive and responsible direction, powered by the groundbreaking possibilities of quantum
computing.

Reference
Andrew, J., & Karthikeyan, J. (2019). Privacy-preserving internet of things: techniques and
applications. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 3229-
3234.
Baumgartner, R., Arora, P., Bath, C., Burljaev, D., Ciereszko, K., Custers, B., Ding, J., Ernst, W.,
Fosch-Villaronga, E., Galanos, V., & Gremsl, T. (2023). Fair and equitable AI in
biomedical research and healthcare: Social science perspectives. Artificial Intelligence in
Medicine, 144, 102658.
Brooks, M. ed. (2012). Quantum computing and communications. Springer Science & Business
Media.
Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree Ramaswamy, P., DC, W., & Chu, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence the
next digital frontier.
Chui, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier. McKinsey and Company Global
Institute, 47(3.6).
Cockburn, I.M., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on
innovation: An exploratory analysis. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An
agenda (pp. 115-146). University of Chicago Press.
Córcoles, A.D., Kandala, A., Javadi-Abhari, A., McClure, D.T., Cross, A.W., Temme, K., Nation,
P.D., Steffen, M., & Gambetta, J.M. (2019). Challenges and opportunities of near-term
quantum computing systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(8), 1338-1352.
Cova, T., Vitorino, C., Ferreira, M., Nunes, S., Rondon-Villarreal, P., & Pais, A. (2022). Artificial
intelligence and quantum computing as the next pharma disruptors. Artificial Intelligence
in Drug Design, 321-347.
De Leon, N.P., Itoh, K.M., Kim, D., Mehta, K.K., Northup, T.E., Paik, H., Palmer, B.S., Samarth,
N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D.W. (2021). Materials challenges and opportunities for
quantum computing hardware. Science, 372(6539), eabb2823.
Domingo-Ferrer, J., Farras, O., Ribes-González, J., & Sánchez, D. (2019). Privacy-preserving
cloud computing on sensitive data: A survey of methods, products and
challenges. Computer Communications, 140, 38-60.
Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi,
R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., & Galanos, V. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI):
Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for
research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57,
101994.
Fosch-Villaronga, E., & Poulsen, A. (2022). Diversity and inclusion in artificial intelligence. Law
and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice, 109-134.

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 678

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI ethics: a review of the social impacts and ethical
implications of artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07892.
Hastuti, R. (2023). Ethical considerations in the age of artificial intelligence: balancing innovation
and social values. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(02), 76-87.
Imre, S. (2014). Quantum computing and communications–Introduction and
challenges. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(1), 134-141.
Jozsa, R., & Linden, N. (2003). On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-
up. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and
Engineering Sciences, 459(2036), 2011-2032.
Konda, S.R. (2022). Ethical Considerations in the Development and Deployment of AI-Driven
Software Systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 6(3), 86-
101.
Li, C. (2023). AI-powered energy internet towards carbon neutrality: challenges and
opportunities. Authorea Preprints.
Li, N. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Disccusion from
the Perspective of Computer Vision. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 179, p. 04024).
EDP Sciences.
Lima, G., Grgić-Hlača, N., Jeong, J.K., & Cha, M. (2022, June). The conflict between explainable
and accountable decision-making algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference
on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 2103-2113).
Marella, S.T., & Parisa, H.S.K. (2020). Introduction to quantum computing. Quantum Computing
and Communications.
Metawei, M.A., Eldeeb, H., Nassar, S.M., & Taher, M. (2022). Quantum Computing Meets
Artificial Intelligence: Innovations and Challenges. In Handbook on Artificial Intelligence-
Empowered Applied Software Engineering: VOL. 1: Novel Methodologies to Engineering
Smart Software Systems (pp. 303-338). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Monlezun, D.J. (2023). The Thinking Healthcare System: Artificial Intelligence and Human
Equity. Elsevier.
Nofer, M., Bauer, K., Hinz, O., van der Aalst, W., & Weinhardt, C. (2023). Quantum
Computing. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(4), 361-367.
Oriji, O., Hassan, A. O., Abitoye, O., Oladayo, G. O. (2023) Comparative analysis of parental
influence and formal education on financial literacy among early university students in
Nigeria: a review of home-based financial teachings and school-based accounting
education. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 5(12),
915-928
Oyebola, O.A., Al Hamad, N.M., Chisom, O.N., Osawaru, b., & Adewusi, E. (2024). AI in
education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology.
Pagano, A., Angelelli, M., Calvano, M., Curci, A., & Piccinno, A., 2023, December. Quantum
computing for learning analytics: an overview of challenges and integration strategies.
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming for Software
Engineering (pp. 13-16).

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 679

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2024

Pal, S. (2023). Quantum computing and algorithms: an exploration of the quantum frontier in data
analytics and computational intelligence. Juni Khyat, 13(10), 145-154.
Rai, S. (2022). Legal Liability Issues and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence.
Ramezani, S.B., Sommers, A., Manchukonda, H.K., Rahimi, S., & Amirlatifi, A. (2020, July).
Machine learning algorithms in quantum computing: A survey. In 2020 International joint
conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Rieffel, E., & Polak, W. (2000). An introduction to quantum computing for non-physicists. ACM
Computing Surveys (CSUR), 32(3), 300-335.
Shams, R.A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2023). AI and the quest for diversity and inclusion: a
systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 1-28.
Stahl, B.C., & Leach, T. (2023). Assessing the ethical and social concerns of artificial intelligence
in neuroinformatics research: An empirical test of the European Union Assessment List for
Trustworthy AI (ALTAI). AI and Ethics, 3(3), 745-767.
Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137-157.
von Eschenbach, W.J. (2021). Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust
AI. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1607-1622.
Walsh, T., Levy, N., Bell, G., Elliott, A., Maclaurin, J., Mareels, I., & Wood, F.M. (2019). The
effective and ethical development of artificial intelligence: an opportunity to improve our
wellbeing. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Weigold, M., Barzen, J., Leymann, F., & Salm, M. (2021). Encoding patterns for quantum
algorithms. IET Quantum Communication, 2(4), 141-152.
Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal
implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for
research. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Wong, A. (2020). The laws and regulation of AI and autonomous systems. Unimagined Futures–
ICT Opportunities and Challenges, 38-54.

Olorunsogo, Jacks, & Ajala, P. 671-680 Page 680