ACA Asset Condition Operations Guide v1.0

Asset Condition Assessment
Asset Condition Operations Guide

2
Version History
Version Date Comments

1.0 21 April 2023 Initial Release
3
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6
1.1 Background ..........................................................................................................................................6
1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................6
1.3 Reasonable Adoption ...........................................................................................................................6
1.4 Change Management ...........................................................................................................................6
3 Document Structure.....................................................................................................................................7
3.1 General Guidelines (Section 4) ............................................................................................................7
3.2 Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines (Section 5) ..................................................................................7
3.3 Technical Performance Measures Library (Section 6) .........................................................................7
4 General Guidelines for all Asset Subclasses ..............................................................................................8
4.1 Work Health & Safety ...........................................................................................................................8
4.2 Qualifications ........................................................................................................................................8
4.3 Condition Assessment Process ...........................................................................................................8
4.4 General TPM Definitions & Process Guidance ................................................................................. 11
4.5 Undertaking the ACA Analysis Requirements .................................................................................. 12
5 Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 40
5.1 IS-001 Buildings ................................................................................................................................ 40
5.2 IS-003 Tram Track ............................................................................................................................ 64
5.3 IS-004 Tram Overhead Wiring .......................................................................................................... 70
5.4 IS-010 Bridges, Subways & Culverts ................................................................................................ 73
5.5 IS-025 Platforms................................................................................................................................ 83
5.6 IS-029 Lifts & Escalators ................................................................................................................... 97
5.7 IS-030 Fire Hydrants & Pump Systems .......................................................................................... 101
5.8 IS-032 Retaining Walls .................................................................................................................... 102
5.9 IS-035 Buffer Stops ......................................................................................................................... 111
5.10 IS-039 At Grade Carparks ........................................................................................................... 112
5.11 IS-041 OHWS, Attachments & Signal Gantries ........................................................................... 113
5.12 IS-042 Poles ................................................................................................................................ 114
5.13 IS-050 Level Crossings & Protection ........................................................................................... 117
5.14 IS-051 Drainage .......................................................................................................................... 125
5.15 IS-053 Embankments and Cuttings ............................................................................................. 127
5.16 IS-058 Signals ............................................................................................................................. 128
5.17 IS-061 Power Supply & Signalling Enclosures ............................................................................ 131
5.18 IS-063 Signal Points – Manual & Spring Loaded ........................................................................ 132
5.19 IS-064 Signal Points – Powered Machines ................................................................................. 136
5.20 IS-065 Signal Points – Point Controller ....................................................................................... 140
5.21 IS-067 Switches ........................................................................................................................... 142
5.22 IS-068 Section Insulators ............................................................................................................ 143
5.23 IS-069 Earthing & Bonding .......................................................................................................... 144
5.24 IS-071 HV AC Switchgear ........................................................................................................... 146
4
5.25 IS-072 Transformers .................................................................................................................... 147

5.26 IS-073 Rectifiers .......................................................................................................................... 148
5.27 IS-074 DC Switchgear ................................................................................................................. 149
5.28 IS-075 Large Power Cables ........................................................................................................ 150
5.29 IS-077 LV Switchgear .................................................................................................................. 153
5.30 IS-078 Small Power & Control Cables ........................................................................................ 154
5.31 IS-079 DC Battery & Charger Systems ....................................................................................... 157
5.32 IS-081 Protection Relays & Systems .......................................................................................... 158
5.33 IS-083 Lighting ............................................................................................................................ 159
5.34 IS-095 UPS Systems ................................................................................................................... 160
5.35 OC-001 Software & Applications ................................................................................................. 162
5.36 OC-003 Workstations, Servers and Storage ............................................................................... 163
5.37 OC-004 Cabinets ......................................................................................................................... 164
5.38 OC-005 Passenger Information Systems .................................................................................... 165
5.39 OC-010 SCADA ........................................................................................................................... 167
5.40 OC-012 AVM System .................................................................................................................. 168
5.41 OC-017 Telephony ...................................................................................................................... 169
5.42 OC-022 Video Surveillance ......................................................................................................... 170
5.43 OC-027 Local and Gateway Communications ............................................................................ 171
5.44 RS-002 Bogie .............................................................................................................................. 172
5.45 RS-003 Main PSU ....................................................................................................................... 173
5.46 RS-004 Traction System ............................................................................................................. 174
5.47 RS-005 Auxiliary PSU ................................................................................................................. 175
5.48 RS-006 Instruments, Controls & Monitoring ................................................................................ 176
5.49 RS-007 Communication .............................................................................................................. 177
5.50 RS-008 Lighting ........................................................................................................................... 179
5.51 RS-009 Climate Control ............................................................................................................... 180
5.52 RS-010 Auxiliary Equipment........................................................................................................ 181
5.53 RS-011 Doors .............................................................................................................................. 182
5.54 RS-012 Pneumatics (Other than braking) ................................................................................... 183
5.55 RS-013 Braking ........................................................................................................................... 184
5.56 RS-014-4 Intercar Connectors (Trams) ....................................................................................... 185
6 TPM Library ............................................................................................................................................ 186
6.1 Battery Current Float ....................................................................................................................... 186
6.2 Battery Resistance .......................................................................................................................... 186
6.3 Boom Gate / Pedestrian Gate Operation (Timing) .......................................................................... 186
6.4 Chipping .......................................................................................................................................... 186
6.5 Collapse .......................................................................................................................................... 187
6.6 Corrosion ......................................................................................................................................... 187
6.7 Cracking .......................................................................................................................................... 188
6.8 Deflection ........................................................................................................................................ 190
6.9 Differential Settlement ..................................................................................................................... 190
5
6.10 Electrical Arcing / Burning ........................................................................................................... 191

6.11 Erosion / Scour ............................................................................................................................ 191
6.12 Flashover ..................................................................................................................................... 191
6.13 Fraying ......................................................................................................................................... 192
6.14 Impact Damage ........................................................................................................................... 192
6.15 Mechanical Damage .................................................................................................................... 192
6.16 Missing Bricks / Mortar Loss ........................................................................................................ 192
6.17 Mould ........................................................................................................................................... 193
6.18 Oil Leakage.................................................................................................................................. 193
6.19 Overheating ................................................................................................................................. 193
6.20 Over-temperature ........................................................................................................................ 193
6.21 Pipe Rot ....................................................................................................................................... 194
6.22 Pollution ....................................................................................................................................... 194
6.23 Potholes ....................................................................................................................................... 194
6.24 Resistance / Continuity Testing ................................................................................................... 194
6.25 Rising Damp ................................................................................................................................ 196
6.26 Rotting Timber ............................................................................................................................. 196
6.27 Rutting ......................................................................................................................................... 196
6.28 Scouring....................................................................................................................................... 196
6.29 Settlement.................................................................................................................................... 197
6.30 Snipe ............................................................................................................................................ 197
6.31 Spalling ........................................................................................................................................ 197
6.32 Splitting ........................................................................................................................................ 198
6.33 Surface Rot .................................................................................................................................. 198
6.34 Termite Attack.............................................................................................................................. 198
6.35 Thermal Degradation ................................................................................................................... 199
6.36 Tilting ........................................................................................................................................... 199
6.37 Timber Loss ................................................................................................................................. 200
6.38 Uplift/heave .................................................................................................................................. 200
6.39 Vegetation Health ........................................................................................................................ 200
6.40 Water Damage............................................................................................................................. 200
6.41 Wear ............................................................................................................................................ 201
6
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
The Asset Condition Assessment (ACA) process captured within this document is to deliver a
consistent assessment of the condition of the assets within the metropolitan rail networks of Victoria. It
builds upon the work of the Asset Condition Assessment Project (ACAP), describing the requirements
for the capture of asset condition data to the Franchisees. Upon collection of this asset condition data,
analysis will be required against a series of condition scores, which will be reported to the Department
of Transport and Planning (DTP) on an agreed periodical basis.
The ACA process identifies the key life-defining performance requirements of a system, capturing the
physical defects, supportability, regulatory and overall system performance issues. These issues may
generate the requirement for renewal by means of non-routine major overhaul, system replacement or
extraordinary intervention, and require future capital expenditure. Within this framework, this is
referred to as “renewals”, as opposed to “operational maintenance” which represent the ongoing and
routine efforts to retain assets in a serviceable condition. These renewals are generally outside the
scope of Franchisee maintenance activities (except possible inspections/checks) and occur only rarely
or not at all within a single franchisee period.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of the Asset Condition Operations Guide (ACOG) is to provide context and guidance in
implementing the ACA Minimum Data Requirements (MDR).
The information in this document should be taken as a guide on the potential processes and
methodologies which can be used; but not considered to be the only method in which the required
data can be acquired and analysed. Alternative methodologies, such as the technologies used to
capture the data, are encouraged to take into account evolving best practices and alignment with any
established processes that Franchisees may have in order to provide the required data as specified
within the MDR.
1.3 Reasonable Adoption

The ACOG operate in combination with Franchisee Standards, contractual requirements,
specifications, and operational requirements along with compliance to relevant Acts, Legislation
Australian Standards, and Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport (DSAPT). Where a
conflict arises or clarification as to the applicability of a Standard or a part of a Standard is required,
the matter must be referred to DTP for determination.
Note: The ACOG should be read in conjunction with the MDR for complete view of the ACA processes
and requirements.
1.4 Change Management

The change management process is essential to ensure currency and traceability for the changes to
this document. This includes any changes to processes, guidance and other changes relevant to any
of the section in this document.
In the event of changes or updates to this document and the requirements within, this is to be
managed in accordance with relevant DTP change process standards and procedures.
7
3 Document Structure
This document has three main sections that act as a guide to support the MDR document, the General
Guidelines, the Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines and the Technical Performance Measures Library.
3.1 General Guidelines (Section 4)

In the General Guidelines, all general information that are applicable across all asset subclasses is
contained. This includes details such as general Work Health & Safety (WHS) requirements, required
qualifications and a general asset condition assessment process.
3.2 Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines (Section 5)

In this section, all asset subclasses within the scope of this document are listed along with their
specific information. A corresponding section for each Asset Subclass can be found in the MDR with
the main data requirements that are supported with the information in this section.
The general structure for each Asset Subclass is as follows:
• Scope – Brief scope of the Asset Subclass and what is included.
• Condition assessment process – Some Asset Subclasses have specific processes which
differ from the general process in section 4.3. The details of these, when required, are detailed
within this section of the Asset Subclass guideline.
• Technical Performance Measures (TPM) – This lists the relevant TPMs for the Asset
Subclass where required.
• Asset Subclass Specific Analysis – Some Asset Subclasses have additional analysis
methodologies in addition to the standard analysis as specified within the MDR. This is detailed
within this section where applicable.
• Defect Pictures/Photographs – This contains example defect pictures/photographs for the
Asset Subclass.
3.3 Technical Performance Measures Library (Section 6)

The TPM Library (Section 6) is referenced in the Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines where there are
measurements required for each Asset Subclass. The TPM library describes the process to be
followed for some measurements that are required in the MDR document for each asset subclass.
8
4 General Guidelines for all Asset Subclasses

This contains all the ‘general’ guidelines which are common to all Asset Subclasses.
4.1 Work Health & Safety

It is the responsibility of all personnel conducting activities related to this document to follow all
respective Work Health & Safety (WHS) or Occupational Health & Safety (OHS) procedures as
required by all organisations including DTP and Franchisees. For example, this may include but is not
limited to:
• Review and follow all guidance in relevant safety management plans
• Pre-activity checks and documentation (i.e., Safe work method statements) are completed
• If any access to the rail corridor is required, relevant approvals and processes are followed
• Correct Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) is supplied and available to all staff conducting
work
• Reporting of incidents to be completed in a timely manner.
4.2 Qualifications
It is expected that all personnel carrying out work in relation to the collection and analysis of data are
appropriately qualified for the task. The required qualifications are to be identified by the Franchisees.
4.3 Condition Assessment Process

The following is the general condition assessment process to be used as a guide for all Asset
Subclasses as applicable.
9
Start
1. Complete pre-assessment checks
2. Check Section 4 for Asset

Subclass specific condition
assessment process requirements
3. Determine Asset Subclass data input and

analysis requirements (Refer MDR)
4. Collate data and QA (Refer MDR)

Physical System
Supportability Regulatory
(Defect Performance
Analysis Analysis
Assessment) Analysis
5. Undertake analysis requirements for Asset

Subclass (Refer MDR)
6. Verify and submit
Figure 1. General Condition Assessment Process
Detail of each step of this process is contained within the following table:
Table 4-1: General Condition Assessment Process Description
Step Description
1. Complete pre- This may include activities such as:
assessment checks • Completing pre-work documentation
• Completing all WHS/OHS related activities (i.e.: Safe Work Method
Statement (SWMS))
• Confirming that personnel conducting the activity have the
appropriate skills
• Confirming that all equipment, tools & PPE are available
• Ensuring all documentation in regards to the required checks and
assets are available
• Obtaining pre-analysis or data required for the task.
2. Check Section 4 for Check the “Condition Assessment Process” section of the Asset Subclass
Asset Subclass Specific Guideline and follow any specific instructions (if applicable)
specific condition relating to the Asset Subclass in addition to this general guidance.
assessment process
requirements
10
3. Determine Asset Refer to the MDR for the required data inputs and subsequent analysis for
Subclass data input the Asset Subclass under consideration.
and analysis
requirements
4. Collate data & Collate the data depending on the type of analysis that is required by the
Quality Assurance Asset Subclass.
(QA) Physical (Defect Assessment)
A physical defect assessment is carried out to identify potential defects
and failure modes on an asset which may require intervention or lead to
degradation of the functionality of the asset.
During the conduct of an inspection and recording information, the
following actions should be taken:
• Documenting any limitations of recording information (i.e. Inability to
access all elements/components of a system).
• Identifying all defects on the assets.
• Referring to the necessary TPMs for guidance on measuring and
recording defects.
• Making sure measurements where required are to an appropriate
level of accuracy (and record the devices used to make the
measurement).
• Taking photographs the overall asset/element/component as well
as closeups of any identified defects to clearly identify the location
of a defect on the asset/element/component.
• Assessing defects according to defect condition ratings where
applicable.
• Updating the element/component model is where applicable.
Supportability Analysis
A supportability analysis is undertaken for assets that have been identified
as having dependence on external support or specialist skill sets. This
represents an assessment of the level of obsolescence exhibited by an
asset. The following general steps should be followed to collate the data
for a supportability assessment.
• Identify the grouping at which the analysis will be performed.
• Identify and obtain a copy of the required questionnaire (refer to
MDR).
• Ensure access to relevant information on the asset (supply
contracts, supplier/OEM information, etc).
System Performance Analysis
A system performance analysis is based on an assessment of historical
failure data to determine if the system is degrading over time.
The following general steps should be followed to collate the data required
for assessment.
• Identify the grouping at which the analysis will be performed.
• Collect all available historic failure data relevant to the method of
failure analysis specified for the Asset Subclass in the MDR.
Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis is based on compliance to specific regulation which
may be applicable to the Asset Subclass (such as compliance to DSAPT
requirements). Noting the variability in regulatory requirements, no general
guidance can be provided. Consult the respective sections within the
Asset Subclass in the MDR for specific guidance on collating data for
regulatory analysis.
5. Undertake analysis Refer to the MDR for the relevant analysis methodology that is required to
requirements for Asset be followed and calculated for the Asset Subclass. Where the Franchisee
Subclass has an alternative methodology, this is to be discussed with DTP for
consideration.
6. Verify and Submit Franchisee to perform final checks on data and analysis undertaken and
then submit to DTP as per the data transfer requirements outlined within
the MDR.
11
4.4 General TPM Definitions & Process Guidance

Within the ACA framework, the focus is on identifying the failure modes causing life-ending failures
which would drive renewals. These failure modes are then selected for further analysis to determine
the underlying failure mechanisms and the Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) which directly
measure the progression of the assessed failure mechanism. These TPMs may either directly
measure “functional performance” or represent “risk of performance”. The TPMs generally require
physical inspections and measurements to be taken.
Detailed measurements provide additional information on the scale of the defect and allow tracking of
changes in defects over time. It is therefore critical that measured data points are adequately
documented so that further measurements can be carried out on the same point during future
inspections.
The following table details the general steps required to conduct measurements of each of the
prescribed defects.
Table 4-2: Generic TPM Process
Step Action
1 Identify data point or points to be measured on each element / component.
2 Identify type of measurements to be completed from TPM.
3 Complete measurements ensure data points are assigned to either:
• Component type.
• Component as per element model.
• Element as per element model.
Include sufficient dimensions to ensure data point traceability.
Further defect specific TPM processes relating to Asset Subclasses have been collated in section 6 as
an overall TPM library. The TPM library is called out by the individual Asset Subclasses as required for
defects relevant to that Asset Subclass.
These are to be read in conjunction with the measurements, measurement accuracy (and devices),
and measurement units outlined in MDR.
12
4.5 Undertaking the ACA Analysis Requirements

This section contains some worked examples for conducting the Physical, Supportability and System
Performance analysis.
4.5.1 Physical (Defect Assessment) Worked Examples

The examples in this section show how a final Asset Condition Rating (ACR) is calculated for an Asset
which has had physical inspection (defect) data captured against it.
4.5.1.1 Example 1: Simple Asset - Poles (IS-042)

A pole is inspected against the requirements of IS-042. The requirements of the MDR requires the
following steps:
Step 1:
Identify the asset; then populate & verify the asset attributes as per Section 4.3 of the MDR.
This results in the following asset attributes being recorded and verified:
Table 4-3: Worked Example – Pole Asset Attributes to be recorded
Attribute Name Value
Location (-37.776941, 144.997463)
ACA Asset Subclass Poles
ACA Asset Type Poles
Construction date 01/01/1965
Asset ID 1001
DTP Asset ID 300001
Franchisee Tram
Table 4-4: Worked Example – Pole Asset Attributes to be verified
Structure Type Steel
Pole Number 66
Step 2:
Identify Simple or Complex Asset as per IS-042 in the MDR.

It has been identified that Poles are to be analysed as a “Simple” asset, therefore element definition is
not required.
Step 3:
Identify and record defects – noting Simple Asset.

• Conduct the physical inspection and identify defect type in line with the guidance in IS-042 of
the MDR.
• Identify component type (on which the defect is identified) as per the matrix provided in IS-042
of the MDR.
• Identify Component Criticality (CC) as per Section 4.4 of the MDR.
• Measure defects as per Section 4.4 & IS-042 of the MDR.
o Assign Defect Condition Rating (DCR) to defect (and TPM where applicable)
o Record measurement approach and assign uncertainty
o Assign Renewal Mode Criteria (RMC).
13
Table 4-5: Worked Example – Pole Asset identification of defects
Rating (DCRraw)
Criterion (RMC)
Renewal Mode
Criticality (CC)
Measurement
Measurement
Component
Uncertainty
TPM Units
Approach
Condition
Defect Type
Component
Defect
TPM
Asset Sub
Defect ID
Asset ID
Class ID
1001 IS-042 2001 Corrosion Pole / 4 3 Marginal 3 Visual 10%

(Section Column Estimation
loss)
1001 IS-042 2002 Corrosion Pole / 4 2 Adequate 2 Visual 10%
(surface) Column Estimation
1001 IS-042 2003 Impact Pole / 4 1 8 mm 1 Tape 2%
Damage Column Measure
Step 4:
Conduct Analysis and calculate ACR.

Follow rules for analysis of a Simple Asset as per Section 4.4 of the MDR.
The steps required to calculate the ACR for a Simple Asset are as per the following steps from the
MDR:
1. Assign the Defect Condition Rating (DCRraw) as per the guidelines for the Asset Subclass
2. Adjust the DCRraw for Component Criticality (CC) as follows:
0 , 𝐶𝐶 < 3
Equation 1: 𝐷𝐶𝑅𝑐𝑐 = {
𝐷𝐶𝑅𝑟𝑎𝑤 + 1, 𝐶𝐶 ≥ 3
Note: for Asset Subclasses with no criticality ratings, DCR CC = DCRraw +1
3. Adjust DCRCC based on the RMC (See table in Section 4.4 of the MDR) to obtain DCRadjust
4. Repeat the above steps for each defect.
5. Calculate the ACR:
Equation 2: 𝐴𝐶𝑅𝑆𝐼𝑀𝑃𝐿𝐸 = max(𝐷𝐶𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 )
Table 4-6: Worked Example – Pole Asset Defect Analysis

Asset ID Asset Sub Defect ID DCRraw CC DCRCC RMC DCRadjust
Class ID
1001 IS-042 2001 3 4 4 3 4
1001 IS-042 2002 2 4 3 2 2

1001 IS-042 2003 1 4 2 1 0
The ACR is then the maximum of DCRadjust which for this example is equal to 4.
4.5.1.2 Example 2: Complex Asset with Construction Element Definition - Buildings (IS-001)
This example is for a station building of timber construction with a metal sheeting roof. It is inspected
against the requirements of IS-001. The requirements of the MDR requires the following steps:
Step 1:
This results in the following asset attributes being recorded & verified:
14
Table 4-7: Worked Example – Building Asset Attributes to be recorded

Location (-37.776941, 144.997463)
ACA Asset Subclass Buildings
ACA Asset Type Station
Construction date 01/01/1965
Asset ID 10001
DTP Assset ID 400001
Franchisee Train
Table 4-8: Worked Example – Building Asset Attributes to be verified
External Wall Material Timber
Roof Material Steel
Station classification Premium
Number of Levels 1
Step 2:
Identify Simple or Complex Asset as per IS-001 in the MDR. If Complex – identify element
definition.
It has been identified that Buildings are to be analysed as a “Complex” asset and the required element
definition is “Construction”.
This requires an element model to be created for the building following the guidance within IS-001:
Table 4-9: Worked Example – Building Element definition breakdown
Element Constituent Element Number
External Wall Each Wall 4
Concourse Each Area 2
Floor Each Floor 1
Foundations n/a 1
Freestanding Walls Each wall 0
Internal Elements Each room 3
Roofing and Canopy Each roof structure 2
Miscellaneous Each item 0
The element attributes are then also recorded as per Section 4.3 of the MDR.
Table 4-10: Worked Example – Building Element Attributes
Asset Element Element Element Constructio Constructio Start Node End Node Length
ID ID Name Type n Date n Material (m)
1002566 23001 Wall 1 Walls 1965 Timber (-37.776941, (-37.776941, 10
144.997463) 144.997473)
144.997473) 144.997473)
144.997473) 144.997463)
144.997463) 144.997463)
1002566 23005 Concourse 1 Concourse 1965 Timber (-37.776941,
144.997463)
1002566 23006 Concourse 2 Concourse 1965 Timber (-37.776941,
144.997463)
1002566 23007 Floor 1 Floors 1965 Concrete (-37.776941,
144.997463)
1002566 23008 Floor 2 Floors 1965 Concrete (-37.776941,
144.997463)
1002566 23009 Foundation Foundations 1965 Concrete (-37.776941,
144.997463)
1002566 23010 Room 1 Internal 1965 Timber (-37.776941,
Elements 144.997463)
1002566 23011 Room 2 Internal 1965 Timber (-37.776941,
Elements 144.997463)
1002566 23012 Roof 1 Roofing and 1965 Steel (-37.776941,
Canopy 144.997463)
15
Step 3:
Identify and record defects – noting complex asset with a construction element definition
For each element identified in the previous table, inspect for defects:
• Conduct the physical inspection and identify defect type in line with guidance in IS-001 of the
MDR
of the MDR.
o Assign DCR to defect (and TPM where applicable)
o Assign Renewal Mode Criteria
o Where the element(s) could not be inspected this should be noted. In this worked example,
all elements were inspected.
Table 4-11: Worked Example – Building Asset identification of defects

Defect Condition
Rating (DCRraw)
Criterion (RMC)
Renewal Mode
Criticality (CC)
Measurement
Measurement
Component
Uncertainty
TPM Units
Element Name
Approach
TPM
Defect Type
Component
Defect ID
Asset ID
1002 1000 Wall 1 Rotting Cladding 3 2 18 % 2 Visual 10%

566 1 Estimation
566 2 Estimation
566 3 Estimation

566 4 Estimation

566 5 Estimation

566 6 Estimation
1002 1000 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 4 % 2 Visual 10%

566 7 fascia Estimation




1002 1001 Roof 1 Rotting Cladding 3 2 19 % 2 Visual 10%

566 2 Estimation

566 3 Estimation

566 4 Estimation
16
Defect Condition
Rating (DCRraw)
Criterion (RMC)
Renewal Mode
Criticality (CC)
Measurement
Measurement
Component
Uncertainty
TPM Units
Element Name
Approach
TPM
Defect Type
Component
Defect ID
Asset ID

566 5 Estimation

566 6 Estimation

566 7 Estimation

566 8 Estimation

566 9 Estimation

566 0 Estimation

566 1 Estimation

566 2 Estimation

566 3 Estimation

566 4 Estimation
Step 4:

Follow rules for analysis of a Complex Asset with Construction Element definition as per Section 4.4 of
the MDR.
The steps required to calculate the ACR for a Complex Asset with Construction Element definition
from the MDR is as follows:
1. Assign the Defect Condition Rating (DCRraw) as per the guidelines for the Asset Subclass.
2. Adjust the DCRraw for CC as follows:
𝐷𝐶𝑅𝑟𝑎𝑤 , 𝐶𝐶 < 3
Note: If DCRraw was originally 4, no adjustment is needed as the maximum value of DCR CC is 4.
3. Adjust DCRCC based on the RMC (See table in Section 4.4 of the MDR) to obtain DCRadjust.
4. Repeat the above steps for each defect identified for the element.
See Table 4-12 for the results of this exercise.
5. Calculate the Asset Element Condition Rating (AECR) as follows:

Equation 4: 𝐴𝐸𝐶𝑅 = max (𝐷𝐶𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 )
6. Repeat the above steps for each element.
7. For all elements where no defects were identified, the AECR for these elements are to be set to
0.
17
8. For all elements which could not be inspected, the AECR for these elements are to be set to -1
and not considered in the calculation of ACR.
9. Plot a cumulative distribution function (CDF) for all the AECR values.
10. Take the 80%tile AECR value as the Asset AECR as per
11. Convert to ACR for the asset as follows:
Equation 5: 𝐴𝐶𝑅 = 𝐴𝐸𝐶𝑅80% + 1
See Table 4-13 for the summary of the AECRs for the elements and the CDF calculation which
shows an overall outcome of ACR = 2 for this Asset.
Table 4-12: Worked Example – Building Asset Defect Analysis

Asset ID Element Defect ID DCRraw CC DCRCC RMC DCRadjust
Name
1002566 Wall 1 10001 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 1 10002 2 3 3 2 2

1002566 Wall 1 10003 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10004 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10005 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10006 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Roof 1 10007 1 2 1 2 0
1002566 Roof 1 10008 1 2 1 2 0
1002566 Roof 1 10009 1 2 1 2 0
1002566 Roof 1 10010 1 2 1 2 0
1002566 Roof 1 10011 1 2 1 2 0
1002566 Roof 1 10012 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10013 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10014 2 3 3 2 2
1002566 Wall 2 10015 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 4 10016 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 4 10017 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 4 10018 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 4 10019 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 3 10020 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 3 10021 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 3 10022 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 3 10023 1 3 2 2 1
1002566 Wall 3 10024 1 3 2 2 1
Table 4-13: Worked Example – Building Asset AECR Calculation and ACR Rollup
Element Element Element Max AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR
ID Type DCR 0 1 2 3 4
23001 Walls Wall 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0
23002 Walls Wall 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0
23003 Walls Wall 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
23004 Walls Wall 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
23005 Concourse Concourse 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
18
Element Element Element Max AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR
ID Type DCR 0 1 2 3 4
23006 Concourse Concourse 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
23007 Floors Floor 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
23008 Floors Floor 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
23009 Foundations Foundation 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
23010 Internal Room 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Elements
23011 Internal Room 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Elements
23012 Roofing and Roof 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0
Canopy
AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR

0 1 2 3 4
# of Elements 7 2 2 0 0
Cumulative # of Elements 7 9 11 11 11
Cumulative % of Elements 64% 82% 100% 100% 100%
Is CDF > 80% N Y N N N
Asset Condition Rating 1 2 3 4 5
4.5.1.3 Example 3: Complex Asset with Linear Element Definition – Retaining Walls (IS-032)
This example is for a 100m long retaining wall that is of timber construction. It is inspected against the
requirements of IS-032. The requirements of the MDR requires the following steps:
Step 1:
Table 4-14: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset Attributes to be recorded
Location (-37.776941, 144.997463)
ACA subclass Retaining Wall
ACA Type Retaining Wall
Construction date 1965
Asset ID 10001
DTP Asset ID 500001
Franchisee Train
Table 4-15: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset Attributes to be verified
Maximum Height 2
Length 100
Material Timber Column and Timber Slab
Step 2:
definition.
It has been identified that Retaining Walls are to be analysed as a “Complex” asset and the required
element definition is “Linear”.
This requires the retaining wall to be segmented into 50m elements and the start & end position of
these recorded. The element attributes are then also recorded as per Section 4.3 of the MDR.
19
Table 4-16: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Elements & Attributes

Asset Element Element Element Constructio Constructio Start Node End Node Length
ID ID Name Type n Date n Material (m)
1002568 1 Section 1 Section 1965 Timber (-37.776941, (-37.776941, 20
144.997463) 144.997473)
144.997473) 144.997483)
144.997483) 144.997493)
144.997493) 144.997503)
144.997503) 144.997513)
Step 3:
Identify and record defects – noting complex asset with a linear element definition
MDR.
of the MDR.
o Where the element(s) could not be inspected this should be noted. In this worked example,
all elements were inspected.
Table 4-17: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset identification of defects

Defect Condition
Rating (DCRraw)
Criterion (RMC)
Renewal Mode
Criticality (CC)
Measurement
Measurement
Component
Uncertainty
TPM Units
Approach
TPM
Defect Type
Component
Element ID
Defect ID
Asset ID
6029 11 1 Differential Columns 3 2 Mode 2 Visual 10%

2057 settlement / posts rate Estimation
6029 12 1 Rotting Sleepers 2 2 17 % 2 Visual 10%
2057 Estimation
2057 Estimation
6029 14 2 Splitting Sleepers 2 2 13 % 2 Visual 10%

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation
6029 16 2 Differential Columns/ 3 2 Mode 2 Visual 10%

2057 settlement posts rate Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation
20
Defect Condition
Rating (DCRraw)
Criterion (RMC)
Renewal Mode
Criticality (CC)
Measurement
Measurement
Component
Uncertainty
TPM Units
Approach
TPM
Defect Type
Component
Element ID
Defect ID
Asset ID

2057 Estimation
6029 21 3 Differential Column 3 1 Minor 2 Visual 10%

2057 Settlement Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation

2057 Estimation
Step 4:

Follow rules for analysis of a Complex Asset with Linear Element definition as per Section 4.4 of the
MDR.
The steps required to calculate the ACR for a Complex Asset with Linear Element definition from the
MDR is as follows:
Note: If DCRraw was originally 4, no adjustment is needed as the maximum value of DCRCC is 4.
5. Calculate the AECR as follows:

0.
8. For all elements which could not be inspected, the AECR for these elements are to be set to -1,
and therefore not considered in the calculation of ACR.
21
Table 4-18: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset Defect Analysis
Asset ID Element ID Defect ID DCRraw CC DCRCC RMC DCRadjust
60292057 1 11 3 3 4 2 2
60292057 1 12 1 2 1 2 0
60292057 1 13 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 2 14 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 2 15 4 2 4 2 2
60292057 2 16 3 3 4 2 2
60292057 2 17 1 2 1 2 0
60292057 2 18 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 3 19 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 3 20 4 2 4 2 2
60292057 3 21 3 3 4 2 2
60292057 3 22 1 2 1 2 0
60292057 3 23 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 4 24 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 4 25 4 2 4 2 2
60292057 4 26 3 2 3 2 2
60292057 4 27 3 2 3 2 2
Table 4-19: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset AECR Calculation and ACR Rollup
Element Element Type Element Name Max AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR
ID DCR 0 1 2 3 4
1 Section Section 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0
AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR

0 1 2 3 4
Is CDR > 80% N N Y Y Y

22
4.5.1.4 Example 4: Complex Asset with Component Element Definition – Bridges (IS-010)
This example is for a predominantly concrete bridge. It is inspected against the requirements of IS-
010. The requirements of the MDR requires the following steps:
Step 1:
Table 4-20: Worked Example – Bridge Asset Attributes to be recorded
Location (-37.776941, 144.997463)
ACA subclass Bridges, Subways & Culverts
ACA Type Underbridge
Construction date 1950
Asset ID 78050
DTP Asset ID 600001
Franchisee Train
Table 4-21: Worked Example – Bridge Asset Attributes to be verified
Type Rail over Road
Superstructure type Deck/Slab
Substructure type Concrete
No. of spans 2
Overall width 20
Overall length 100
Deck Construction Concrete Deck
Deck Material Concrete
Step 2:
definition.
It has been identified that this bridge is to be analysed as a “Complex” asset and the required element
definition is “Component” (each component is considered its own element).
This requires an element (component) model to be created for the bridge. The element attributes are
then also recorded as per Section 4.3 of the MDR.
Table 4-22: Worked Example – Bridge Element definition breakdown
Element (Component) Number of
Components
Deck / slab 2
Kerb 0
Railings / Barrier 2
Safety Screen 0
Girder / Beam 6
Truss 0
Arch 0
Cable / Hangers 0
Corbel 0
Crossbeam 0
Diaphragm / Bracing 4
Bearing 0
Deck joint 3
Stringer 0
Headstock 2
Column / Pile / Pier wall 1
Abutment 2
23
Wingwall / Retaining 4
wall
Footing / Pile cap 1
Deflection Walls 0
Bracing / Waler 0
Anchorage 0
Table 4-23: Worked Example – Bridge Elements & Attributes

Asset ID Element ID Element Element Type Construction Construction Start Node End Node Length (m)
Name Date Material
78050 123 Deck 1 Deck / slab 1950 Concrete (-37.776951, (-37.776941, 20
144.997462) 144.997464)
78050 124 Deck 2 Deck / slab 1950 Concrete (-37.776941, (-37.776931, 20
144.997462) 144.997464)
78050 125 Railing 1 Railings / 1980 Steel (-37.776951, (-37.776931, 40
Barrier 144.997462) 144.997462)
78050 126 Railing 2 Railings / 1980 Steel (-37.776951, (-37.776931, 40
Barrier 144.997464) 144.997464)
78050 127 Beam 1 Girder / Beam 1950 Steel (-37.776951, (-37.776941, 20
144.997462) 144.997462)
78050 128 Beam 2 Girder / Beam 1950 Concrete (-37.776951, (-37.776941, 20
144.997463) 144.997463)
144.997464) 144.997464)
144.997462) 144.997462)
144.997463) 144.997463)
144.997464) 144.997464)
78050 133 Bracing 1 Diaphragm / 1950 Steel (-37.776951, (-37.776941,
Bracing 144.997462) 144.997463)
Bracing 144.997463) 144.997464)
Bracing 144.997462) 144.997463)
Bracing 144.997463) 144.997464)
78050 137 Joint 1 Deck joint 2000 (-37.776951, (-37.776951, 25
144.997462 144.997463)
78050 138 Joint 2 Deck joint 2000 (-37.776941, (-37.776941, 25
144.997462) 144.997464)
78050 139 Joint 3 Deck joint 2000 (-37.776931, (-37.776931, 25
144.997463) 144.997464)
78050 140 Headstock 1 Headstock 1950 Concrete (-37.776951, (-37.776951, 25
144.997462 144.997463)
78050 141 Headstock 2 Headstock 1950 Concrete (-37.776931, (-37.776931, 25
144.997463) 144.997464)
78050 142 Column 1 Column / Pile / 1950 Concrete (-37.776941, (-37.776941, 1
Pier wall 144.997462) 144.997464)
78050 145 Wingwall 1 Wingwall / 1950 Concrete (-37.776931, (-37.776928, 5
Retaining wall 144.997463) 144.997463)
78050 146 Wingwall 2 Wingwall / 1950 Concrete (-37.776951, (-37.776956, 5
Retaining wall 144.997463) 144.997463)
78050 147 Footing / Pile Footing 1 1950 Concrete (-37.776941, (-37.776941,
cap 144.997462) 144.997464)
78050 148 Abutment 1 Abutment 1950 Concrete (-37.776931, (-37.776931, 25
144.997463) 144.997464)
Step 3:
Identify and record defects – noting complex asset with a component element definition
MDR.
of the MDR.
o Where the component(s) could not be inspected this should be noted. In this worked
example, the Footing component of the bridge was inaccessible.
24
Table 4-24: Worked Example – Bridge Asset identification of defects
Renewal Mode Criterion
Measurement Approach
Defect Condition Rating
Component Criticality
Measurement
Uncertainty
TPM Units
(DCRraw)
(RMC)
TPM
(CC)
Defect Type
Component
Element ID
Defect ID
Asset ID
78050 101 Beam 1 Spalling Girder / 4 3 5 % 3 Visual 10%

904 Beam Estimation
904 Beam Estimation
78050 103 Headstock 1 Spalling Headstock 4 3 7 % 1 Visual 10%
904 Estimation
78050 104 Bracing 1 Cracking Diaphragm / 3 3 0.25 mm 3 Crack Width 5%

904 (shear) bracing Gauge

904 Beam Estimation

904 Beam Estimation

904 Beam Estimation

904 Beam Estimation
78050 109 Headstock 2 Cracking Headstock 4 3 0.5 mm 2 Crack Width 5%

904 (concrete) Gauge
78050 110 Headstock 2 Spalling Headstock 4 4 14 % 1 Visual 10%

904 Estimation

904 Beam Estimation
78050 112 Railing 1 Cracking Railings / 2 1 0.05 mm 1 Crack Width 5%

904 (shrinkage) Barrier Gauge

904 Beam Estimation
Step 4:

Follow rules for analysis of a Complex Asset with Linear Element definition as per Section 4.4 of the
MDR.
The steps required to calculate the ACR for a Complex Asset with Component Element definition from
the MDR is as follows:
Note: If DCRraw was originally 4, no adjustment is needed as the maximum value of DCR CC is 4.
25
5. Calculate the AECR as follows:

0.
8. For all elements which could not be inspected, the AECR for these elements are to be set to -1,
and therefore not considered in the calculation of ACR.
Table 4-25: Worked Example – Bridge Asset Defect Analysis

Asset ID Element Component Defect ID DCRraw CC DCRCC RMC DCRadjust
Name Type
78050904 Beam 1 Girder / Beam 101 2 4 3 3 3
78050904 Beam 2 Girder / Beam 102 1 4 2 1 0
78050904 Headstock 1 Headstock 103 1 4 2 1 0
78050904 Bracing 1 Diaphragm / 104 3 3 4 3 3

bracing
78050904 Beam 3 Girder / Beam 105 1 4 2 2 0
78050904 Beam 3 Girder / Beam 106 1 4 2 2 0
78050904 Beam 4 Girder / Beam 107 1 4 2 1 0
78050904 Beam 4 Girder / Beam 108 1 4 2 2 0
78050904 Beam 5 Girder / Beam 111 1 4 2 1 0
78050904 Railing 1 Railings / Barrier 112 2 2 2 1 0
78050904 Beam 6 Girder / Beam 113 2 1 2 3 2
Table 4-26: Worked Example – Bridge Asset AECR Calculation and ACR Rollup
Element Element Type Max DCR AEC AECR0 AECR1 AECR2 AECR3 AECR4
R
Deck 1 Deck / slab 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Deck 2 Deck / slab 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Railing 1 Railings / Barrier 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Railing 2 Railings / Barrier 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Beam 1 Girder / Beam 3 3 0 0 0 1 0
26
Element Element Type Max DCR AEC AECR0 AECR1 AECR2 AECR3 AECR4
R
Bracing 1 Diaphragm / Bracing 2 2 0 0 0 1 0
Joint 1 Deck joint 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Headstock 1 Headstock 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Headstock 2 Headstock 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
Column 1 Column / Pile / Pier wall 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Wingwall 1 Wingwall / Retaining 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
wall
Wingwall 2 Wingwall / Retaining 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
wall
Footing 1 Footing 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0
Abutment 1 Abutment 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Abutment 2 Abutment 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
AECR0 AECR1 AECR2 AECR3 AECR4

Is Cumulative Density > 80%? Y Y Y Y Y
4.5.2 Supportability Analysis Worked Examples

The examples in this section show how a Supportability DCR is calculated for eligible components.
A Supportability Assessment is to be undertaken for components that have been identified as having
dependence on external support (Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or approved) or specialist
skill sets; for example:
• Ongoing replacement / repair of a component can only be provided by a specialist 3 rd party
• Underlying technology becoming obsolete
• Replacement / maintenance of the component costs escalate to an unacceptable level
• Component no longer produced and cannot be replaced by a like product.
A Supportability Assessment represents an assessment of the level of obsolescence exhibited by a

system.
Referring to OC-022 Video Surveillance, a Supportability Assessment is to be undertaken.
The decision flow for identifying eligible components conducting a Supportability Assessment is
outlined in Figure 2.
27
Is the component N Assessment not

likely to have a required.
supportability issue?
Y
Is the component Y
readily available off-
the-shelf?
Conduct supportability
assessment
Figure 2: Supportability Assessment Decision Framework

A supportability assessment is used to determine the Supportability DCR for eligible components
identified using Figure 2.
For each component, eligibility for the Supportability Assessment was identified using Figure
2. The core components of this asset subclass that are in scope are:
Eligible for Supportability Assessment Not eligible for Supportability Assessment
Specific Cameras Generic Cameras
• Is the component likely to have a •
Is the component likely to have a
supportability issue: Yes supportability issue: Yes
• Is the component readily available • Is the component readily available
off-the-shelf: No off-the-shelf: Yes
• Supportability Assessment to be • Supportability Assessment is not to
conducted. be conducted.
Specialist Servers Workstation (Viewing footage for Operators)
• Is the component likely to have a • Is the component likely to have a
Specialist Servers #2 Server
• Is the component likely to have a
supportability issue: Yes
• Is the component readily available
off-the-shelf: Yes
off-the-shelf: No
• Supportability Assessment is not to
• Supportability Assessment to be
be conducted.
conducted.
Camera Hardware and Support Local and gateway communications
off-the-shelf: Yes
off-the-shelf: No
• Supportability Assessment is not to
• Supportability Assessment to be
be conducted.
conducted.
Bespoke Software Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) Software
• Is the component likely to have a • Is the component likely to have a
28

4.5.2.1 Calculation Summary

Data collected by the assessor as part of the supportability assessment represents the inputs used to
calculate TTISUP.
Table 4-27: TTISUP Description
Item Description
TTISUP Function of the Time to Supportability Expiry (TSETime) and the Years of Available
Spares Stock (SYears)
TSETime Represents obsolescence and a critical decision point regarding the sustainment of
an asset.
Note: Must be understood as a priority due to potential consequences of exceeding
this point without considering the impact of obsolescence.
SYears An estimation of the time remaining until an asset can no longer be supported after
TSETime
The Supportability DCR is then determined by bandings of TTISUP as detailed in Figure 3.

The Supportability Assessment Methodology assumes that all applicable lead times have been
appropriately considered and do not hinder the availability of components. Further, where there is an
end-date for the supply of new components, as advised by an OEM or Distributor, the supply is
assumed to completely and immediately cease thereafter.
4.5.2.2 Calculation Process

Where an Asset Subclass is determined to require a supportability analysis – the following steps are to
be followed.
1. The level of analysis which will be carried out per Asset Subclass is to be determined. Some
guidance may be provided within the Asset Subclass specific requirements in Section 8 of the
MDR, however, this may change over time as equipment becomes obsolete and is replaced.
Where there is no guidance provided, the Franchisee shall determine at what level the analysis
will be carried out and seek agreement with DTP. At a minimum it is expected to be conducted
at the Asset Subclass level. Potential options for grouping are:
a. At the Asset Subclass level.
b. At the Asset Type level.
c. Per make/model of assets.
2. Fill out the questionnaire for each component of the system under consideration. Note that
software must also be considered as a separate ‘component’ if relevant to the system under
analysis and the questionnaire contains a different set of questions when considering software.
3. Using the outputs of the questionnaire – determine the inputs to the calculation of TTISUP.
4. Calculate the Objective Supportability Time to Intervention (TTISUP) using Equation 12 for each
component.
Equation 12: 𝑇𝑇𝐼𝑆𝑢𝑝 = (𝑇𝑆𝐸𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 ) + 𝑆𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
5. Record the TTISUP for each component of the system, the minimum TTISUP is then recorded as the
“System TTISUP”.
6. Determine the Supportability DCR of the system based on the following bandings of System
TTISUP:
29
1 2 3 4 5
TTISUP > 20yrs 20 ≥ TTISUP > 14 14 ≥ TTISUP > 8 8 ≥ TTISUP > 3 TTISUP ≤ 3yrs
Figure 3: Supportability DCR Bandings
4.5.2.3 Worked Example for Specialist Servers

Step 1:
The level of analysis which will be carried out per Asset Subclass is to be determined.
Supportability Analysis was conducted per make/model of asset for this Asset Subclass.
Step 2:
Fill out the questionnaire for each component of the system under consideration. Note that
analysis and the questionnaire contains a different set of questions when considering
software.
Answer the questions in the Supportability Questionnaire below and record each outcome, as
required.
The Supportability Questionnaire from Section 9 of the MDR was answered and the outcomes are
shown in blue below for Specialist Servers.
Table 4-28: Supportability Questionnaire for Specialist Servers
Question Question – Physical Asset Question – Software Answer & Recording Next Step
No. and Applications Instruction
Q1 Is the component available, N/A for software and Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to Q2,
as new, from the OEM or applications or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 if ‘No’ progress to Q4
Distributor? under A1
Q2 Is there an end-date for the N/A for software and Record either ‘Yes’ or If ‘Yes’ progress to Q3,
supply of new components, applications ‘No’ in Table 4-30 if ‘No’ progress to Q4
as advised by the OEM or under A2
Distributor?
Q3 When is the end-date for the N/A for software and Record the time Progress to Q4
supply of new components? applications remaining until the
end-date for the supply
of new components
relative to the date of
assessment (in years)
in Table 4-29 under A3
Q4 Is a contract established Is the software or Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to
with the OEM or Distributor application covered by a or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 Q5, if ‘No’ progress to
for the continued support contract with the under A4 Q8
supply/replacement of OEM or an endorsed
components? support agency?
Q5 When does the When does the support Record the time Progress to Q6
supply/replacement contract expire? remaining until
contract expire? supply/replacement
contract end date
assessment (in
years) in Table 4-29
under A5
Q6 Does an option exist to Is there an option to Do not record A6 If ‘Yes’ progress to Q7,
renew the renew the support if ‘No’ progress to Q8
supply/replacement contract?
contract?
30
Q7 What is the length of the What is the length of the Record the length of Progress to Q8
extension option? extension option? the extension option
relative to the existing
supply/replacement
contract end-date (in
under A7
Q8 Is a repair/renewal contract Is there an internal Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to
in place which covers support team who have or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 Q9, if ‘No’ progress to
component renewal? the ability to make: under A8 Q12
• User changes
• Configuration changes
• Integration changes
Architectural changes
Q9 What is the end date for the What are the dates at Record the time Progress to Q10
repair/maintenance which there is an remaining until
contract? anticipated system repair/renewal
change that the internal contract end date
support team can no relative to the date of
longer make: assessment (in
• User changes years) in Table 4-29
• Configuration changes under A9
Q10 Does an option exist to N/A for software and Do not record A10 If ‘Yes’ progress to
renew the repair/renewal applications. Q11, if ‘No’ progress
contract? to Q12
Q11 What is the length of the N/A for software and Record the length of Progress to Q12
extension option? applications the extension option
repair/renewal
under A11
Q12 What is the quantity of N/A for software and Record Average Progress to Q13
Average Stock on Hand for applications. Stock on Hand (qty)
the component? in Table 4-29 under
A12
Q13 What is the component N/A for software and Record Usage Rate
Usage Rate? applications. (qty/year) in Table
4-29 under A13
Step 3:
Using the outputs of the questionnaire – determine the inputs to the calculation of TTISUP.
For Specialist Servers, the Supportability Questionnaire (Table 4-28) was followed, and the answers
are recorded in Table 4-29 and Table 4-30 below:
Table 4-29: Supportability Questionnaire Answers (TTISUP Calculation Inputs)
Component A3 A5 A7 A9 A11 A12 A13
[years] [years] [years] [years] [years] [qty] [qty/yea
r]
Specialist Servers N/A -2 N/A 4 N/A 2 1
Note A5 is negative for this example which indicates that there is no existing contract in place and the
previous contract has already lapsed for a number of years.
Table 4-30: Supportability Questionnaire Answers (TSETime Inputs)
31
Component A1 [Yes/No] A2 [Yes/No] A4 [Yes/No] A8 [Yes/No]

Specialist Servers NO NO YES YES
Using the values in Table 4-29, calculate each of the below and record in Table 4-31.
A. End of OEM/distributor availability (N/A for software/applications) = A3
B. Supply/replacement contract expiry (end of application/software support by OEM) = A5 + A7
C. Repair/maintenance contract expiry (end of internal team ability to accommodate user changes,
configuration changes, integration changes, architectural changes) = A9 + A11
D. Years of Available Spares Stock (SYears) (N/A for software/applications) = A12/A13
Specialist Servers:
A. End of OEM/distributor availability = N/A
B. Supply/replacement contract expiry (end of application/software support by OEM) = A5 + A7 = -
2 + 0 = -2
configuration changes, integration changes, architectural changes) = A9 + A11 = 4 + 0 = 4
D. Years of Available Spares Stock (SYears) = 2/1 = 2
Table 4-31: Raw TTISUP Calculation Inputs
Component A [years] B [years] C [years] D [years]
Specialist Servers N/A -2 4 2
Determine Time to Supportability Expiry in accordance with Figure 4-4. For Specialist Servers, the
steps followed to Determine Time to Supportability Expiry are shown in red below:
32
Start
Y
A1 TSETime = 0
N
N
N N
A2 A4 A8
Y Y Y
Y Y
Is ‘C’ greater
A8
than ‘B’?
N N
Record ‘A’ as the Limitation Record ‘B’ as the Limitation Record ‘C’ as the Limitation
Criteria in Table 1-6 and Criteria in Table 1-6 and Criteria in Table 1-6 and
record the corresponding record the corresponding record the corresponding
value from Table 1-5 as value from Table 1-5 as value from Table 1-5 as
‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-6 ‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-6 ‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-6
Record ‘B’ as the Limitation Record ‘C’ as the Limitation
Record ‘D’ from Table 1-5

as ‘SYears’ in Table 1-6
Figure 4-4: Time to Supportability Expiry for Specialist Servers
The answers from the Time to Supportability Expiry are filled out below:
Table 4-32: TTISUP Calculation Inputs (Equation 12)
Component Limitation Criteria (A, B or C) TSETime SYears (D)
Specialist C 4 years 2 years
Servers
Step 4:
Calculate the Objective Supportability Time to Intervention (TTI SUP) using Equation 13 for each
component.
Specialist Servers:
𝑇𝑇𝐼𝑆𝑢𝑝 = 4 + 2 = 6 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
33
Step 5:
Record the TTISUP for each component of the system, the minimum TTI SUP is then recorded as
the “System TTISUP”.
Component TTISup (years)

Specialist Servers 6
Step 6:
Determine the Supportability DCR of the system based on the following bandings of System
TTISUP:
1 2 3 4 5
TTISUP > 20yrs 20 ≥ TTISUP > 14 14 ≥ TTISUP > 8 8 ≥ TTISUP > 3 TTISUP ≤ 3yrs

Component TTISup (years) Supportability DCR
Specialist 6 4
Servers
4.5.2.4 Worked Example for Specific Cameras

Step 1:
The level of analysis which will be carried out per Asset Subclass is to be determined.
Supportability Analysis was conducted per make/model of asset for this Asset Subclass.
Step 2:
Fill out the questionnaire for each component of the system under consideration. Note that
analysis and the questionnaire contains a different set of questions when considering
software.
Answer the questions in the Supportability Questionnaire below and record each outcome, as
required.
The Supportability Questionnaire from Section 9 of the MDR was answered and the outcomes are
shown in blue below for Specific Cameras.
Table 4-33: Supportability Questionnaire for Specific Cameras
Q1 Is the component available, N/A for software and Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to
as new, from the OEM or applications or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 Q2, if ‘No’ progress to
Distributor? under A1 Q4
Q2 Is there an end-date for the N/A for software and Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to Q3,
supply of new components, applications or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 if ‘No’ progress to Q4
as advised by the OEM or under A2
Distributor?
Q3 When is the end-date for the N/A for software and Record the time Progress to Q4
supply of new components? applications remaining until the
end-date for the supply
of new components
assessment (in years)
in Table 4-29 under A3
34
Q4 Is a contract established Is the software or Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to
with the OEM or Distributor application covered by a or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 Q5, if ‘No’ progress to
for the continued support contract with the under A4 Q8
supply/replacement of OEM or an endorsed
components? support agency?
Q5 When does the When does the support Record the time Progress to Q6
supply/replacement contract expire? remaining until
contract expire? supply/replacement
contract end date
assessment (in
under A5
Q6 Does an option exist to Is there an option to Do not record A6 If ‘Yes’ progress to
renew the renew the support Q7, if ‘No’ progress to
supply/replacement contract? Q8
contract?
Q7 What is the length of the What is the length of the Record the length of Progress to Q8
extension option? extension option? the extension option
relative to the
existing
supply/replacement
under A7
Q8 Is a repair/renewal contract Is there an internal Record either ‘Yes’ If ‘Yes’ progress to Q9,
in place which covers support team who have or ‘No’ in Table 4-30 if ‘No’ progress to
component renewal? the ability to make: under A8 Q12
• User changes
Q9 What is the end date for the What are the dates at Record the time Progress to Q10
repair/maintenance contract? which there is an remaining until
anticipated system repair/renewal
change that the internal contract end date
support team can no relative to the date of
longer make: assessment (in years)
• User changes in Table 4-29 under A9
Q10 Does an option exist to renew N/A for software and Do not record A10 If ‘Yes’ progress to
the repair/renewal contract? applications. Q11, if ‘No’ progress to
Q12
Q11 What is the length of the N/A for software and Record the length of Progress to Q12
extension option? applications the extension option
repair/renewal
under A11
Q12 What is the quantity of N/A for software and Record Average Progress to Q13
Average Stock on Hand for applications. Stock on Hand (qty)
the component? in Table 4-29 under
A12
Q13 What is the component N/A for software and Record Usage Rate
Usage Rate? applications. (qty/year) in Table
4-29 under A13
35
Step 3:
Using the outputs of the questionnaire – determine the inputs to the calculation of TTISUP.
For Specific Cameras, the Supportability Questionnaire (Table 4-33) was followed and the answers
are recorded in Table 4-34 and Table 4-35:
Table 4-34: Supportability Questionnaire Answers (TTISUP Calculation Inputs)
Component A3 A5 A7 A9 A11 A12 A13
[years] [years] [years] [years] [years] [qty] [qty/yea
r]
Specific Cameras N/A 3 3 N/A N/A 23 2
Table 4-35: Supportability Questionnaire Answers (TSETime Inputs)

Component A1 [Yes/No] A2 [Yes/No] A4 [Yes/No] A8 [Yes/No]
Specific Cameras YES NO YES NO
Using the values in Table 4-34, calculate each of the below and record in Table 4-36.
A. End of OEM/distributor availability (N/A for software/applications) = A3
B. Supply/replacement contract expiry (end of application/software support by OEM) = A5 + A7
configuration changes, integration changes, architectural changes) = A9 + A11
D. Years of Available Spares Stock (SYears) (N/A for software/applications) = A12/A13
Specific Cameras:
A. End of OEM/distributor availability = N/A
B. Supply/replacement contract expiry (end of application/software support by OEM) = A5 + A7 = 3
+3=6
configuration changes, integration changes, architectural changes) = A9 + A11 = 0
D. Years of Available Spares Stock (SYears) = 23/2 = 11.5
Table 4-36: Raw TTISUP Calculation Inputs

Component A [years] B [years] C [years] D [years]
Specific Cameras N/A 6 0 11.5
Determine Time to Supportability Expiry in accordance with Figure 4-6. For Specific Cameras, the
steps followed to Determine Time to Supportability Expiry are shown in red below:
36
Start
Y
A1 TSETime = 0
N
N
N N
A2 A4 A8
Y Y Y
Y Y
Is ‘C’ greater
A8
than ‘B’?
N N
Record ‘A’ as the Limitation Record ‘B’ as the Limitation Record ‘C’ as the Limitation
Criteria in Table 1-11and Criteria in Table 1-11 and Criteria in Table 1-11and
record the corresponding record the corresponding record the corresponding
value from Table 1-10 as value from Table 1-10 as value from Table 1-10 as
‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-11 ‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-11 ‘TSEtime’ in Table 1-11
Record ‘B’ as the Limitation Record ‘C’ as the Limitation
Record ‘D’ from Table 1-10

as ‘SYears’ in Table 1-11
Figure 4-6: Time to Supportability Expiry for Specific Cameras
The answers from the Time to Supportability Expiry are filled out below:
Table 4-37: TTISUP Calculation Inputs (Equation 12)
Component Limitation Criteria (A, B or C) TSETime SYears (D)
Specific Cameras B 6 years 11.5 years
Step 4:
Calculate the Objective Supportability Time to Intervention (TTI SUP) using Equation 14 for each
component.
Specific Cameras:
𝑇𝑇𝐼𝑆𝑢𝑝 = 6 + 11.5 = 17.5 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
37
Step 5:
Record the TTISUP for each component of the system, the minimum TTI SUP is then recorded as
the “System TTISUP”.
Component TTISup (years)

Specific Cameras 17.5
Step 6:
Determine the Supportability DCR of the system based on the following bandings of System
TTISUP:
1 2 3 4 5
TTISUP > 20yrs 20 ≥ TTISUP > 14 14 ≥ TTISUP > 8 8 ≥ TTISUP > 3 3yrs ≤ TTISUP

Component TTISup (years) Supportability DCR
Specific Cameras 17.5 2
4.5.3 System Performance (Failure Rate) Worked Examples

The examples in this section show how a System Performance Condition Rating is calculated for a
Signal Points Asset Subclass.
Worked Example: “Route A”

This example is for a signal point asset type of a particular make and model which was then chosen to
be grouped based on routes.
Step 1:
Identify how the asset will be grouped – for example, by Location / Asset Subclass / Asset type.
This asset type will be grouped by train line in order to analyse what is happening on one particular
train route. The train line to be analysed will be labelled “Line A”.
Step 2:
Collect the failure data as required by the grouping.

In total, 70 failures were recorded on the following dates:
Table 4-38: Failure times (date) of the asset type
11/01/2016 3/06/2016 10/02/2017 12/12/2017 12/02/2018 12/06/2018 25/01/2019
13/01/2016 23/09/2016 24/03/2017 14/12/2017 13/03/2018 14/06/2018 21/02/2019
15/02/2016 26/09/2016 5/05/2017 27/12/2017 13/03/2018 17/06/2018 22/02/2019
9/03/2016 21/10/2016 8/05/2017 22/01/2018 20/03/2018 20/06/2018 27/02/2019
22/03/2016 23/11/2016 9/06/2017 24/01/2018 10/04/2018 2/08/2018 27/02/2019
3/04/2016 30/11/2016 27/08/2017 25/01/2018 20/04/2018 31/10/2018 1/03/2019
27/04/2016 1/12/2016 5/10/2017 5/02/2018 16/05/2018 20/11/2018 4/03/2019
29/04/2016 30/12/2016 13/10/2017 5/02/2018 24/05/2018 11/12/2018 22/03/2019
7/05/2016 30/12/2016 23/10/2017 6/02/2018 28/05/2018 21/12/2018 13/05/2019
12/05/2016 15/01/2017 19/11/2017 6/02/2018 4/06/2018 4/01/2019 31/05/2019
38
This is then converted to a time unit (in this case ‘000 hours) to enable the analysis to be conducted
with reference to the first failure (which set set to 0). This first value is then removed from the data set
for the analysis as a zero value will cause an error in subsequent calculations. The total number of
failures for subsequent calculations is then also considered to be 69.
Table 4-39: Failure times (‘000 hrs) of the asset type
0 3.456 9.504 16.824 18.312 21.192 26.64
0.048 6.144 10.512 16.872 19.008 21.24 27.288
0.84 6.216 11.52 17.184 19.008 21.312 27.312
1.392 6.816 11.592 17.808 19.176 21.384 27.432
1.704 7.608 12.36 17.856 19.68 22.416 27.432
1.992 7.776 14.256 17.88 19.92 24.576 27.48
2.568 7.8 15.192 18.144 20.544 25.056 27.552
2.616 8.496 15.384 18.144 20.736 25.56 27.984
2.808 8.496 15.624 18.168 20.832 25.8 29.232
2.928 8.88 16.272 18.168 21 26.136 29.664
Step 3:
Solve for the Power law parameters θ and β

In order to calculate β, the following equation is used:
𝑚
𝛽̂ =
𝑚 ln 𝑡𝑘 − ∑𝑚
𝑖=1 ln 𝑡𝑖
Where:
𝑚 Is the total number of failures over the study period
𝑡𝑘 Is the total life (or operating cycles) observed for the asset to the end of the study period
𝑡𝑖 Is the time (or operating cycles) elapsed since the last failure
𝒎 (#) = 69
𝒕𝒌 = 29.664 (‘000 hrs)
Solve for β
𝜷 = 1.093
This then allows θ to be calculated using the following equation:

𝑚
𝜃̂ =
(𝑡𝑘 )𝛽
𝜽 = 1.698
As the value of β > 1, this suggests the system is degrading.
Step 4:
Calculate the chi-squared statistic

Solve for 𝜒 2 according to the following equation.
𝑚−1
2
𝑡𝑘
𝜒2(𝑚−1) = 2 ∑ ln
𝑡𝑖
𝑖
𝟐
𝝌 =0.286
39
Step 5:
Calculate the p-value and determine System Performance Condition Rating.

Calculate the p-value using the following equation.
𝑝 = min (𝜒 2 , 1 − 𝜒 2 )
𝑝 = 0.286
From the p-value, a rating can be determined using the following table.
Table 4-40: System Performance Condition Rating
System 1 2 3 4 5
Performance
Condition p≥0.2 or β≤1 0.2>p≥0.1 0.1>p≥0.05 0.05>p≥0.02 p<0.02
Rating β>1 β>1 β>1 β>1
General Statistically Weak evidence Some evidence Evidence exists Strong
Narrative significant exists to exists to to suggest an Evidence exists
evidence does suggest an suggest an increase in to suggest and
not exist to increase in increase in failure rate. increase in
suggest an failure rate. failure rate. failure rate.
increase in
failure rate.
As β>1 and p>0.2, the System Performance Condition Rating for “Line A” is 1. This indicates that
there does not exist statistically significant evidence that suggests an increase in failure rate.
Repeating this analysis for this asset type for a couple of other routes and the entire network
yields the following results:
Table 4-41: Summary of results
Route A Route B Route C Route D Entire Network
m 69 9 212 144 2104
tk 29.664 29.616 29.712 29.928 30.264
θ 1.698 6.52E-16 13.542 3.190 60.798
β 1.093 10.968 0.811 1.121 1.039
χ2 0.286 2.47E-06 0.109 0.0420
P 0.286 2.47E-06 0.109 0.0420
CR 1 5 1 (β<1) 2 4
These results highlight the importance of grouping on the data as different sub-populations within the
overall network may have significantly different results to each other, and the network as a whole.
40
5 Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines

5.1 IS-001 Buildings
5.1.1 Scope
Buildings are defined as any structure intended to provide shelter, service and facilities as part of the
public transport system. The following is a list of assets in scope:
• Amenity buildings
• Awnings & shelters
• Communication huts
• Depots
• Maintenance facilities
• Signalling huts
• Station buildings including kiosks, shops, administrative buildings, protective service offices and
ticketing buildings
• Substations.
5.1.2 Condition Assessment Process

Follow the general condition assessment process (Figure 1).
5.1.3 Technical Performance Measures

The following defect specific TPM processes apply to this Asset Subclass as per the TPM library.
Table 5.1-1: TPMs relevant to Asset Subclass
TPM Description TPM Library Reference
Corrosion (Section Loss) - Option 1 Table 6-7
Corrosion (Surface) Table 6-9
Cracking (Concrete) Table 6-12
Cracking (Brick / Masonry) Table 6-13
Differential Settlement (Options 1 & 2) Table 6-18 & Table 6-19
Missing Bricks / Mortar Loss Table 6-27
Mould Table 6-28
Rising Damp Table 6-37
Rotting Timber Table 6-38
Spalling - Option 1 Table 6-44
Splitting Table 6-46
Termite attack Table 6-48
Tilting (Options 1 & 2) Table 6-50 & Table 6-51
Water Damage Table 6-57
41
5.1.4 Defect Pictures/Photographs

Corrosion
Defect 1 Minor Defect
Condition
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
42
Corrosion
3 Major Defect
4 Severe
Defect
43
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
44
Cracking (Concrete)
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
45
Cracking (Masonry)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
46
Cracking (Masonry)
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
47
Deflection (sag or bow of structural component)

Defect 1 Minor Not available
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate Not available
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe Not available

Defect
48
Missing/failed elements/connections
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
49
Missing/failed elements/connections
4 Severe
Defect
50
Missing or loose bricks/tiles/Mortar loss

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
51
Missing or loose bricks/tiles/Mortar loss

3 Major
Defect
4 Severe Not Available

Defect
52
Mould
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
53
Rising Damp
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
54
Rising Damp
4 Severe
Defect
55
Rotting
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
56
Rotting
4 Severe
Defect
Spalling
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate Not Available

Defect
3 Major Not Available
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
57
Splitting/Splintering
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
58
4 Severe
Defect
Termite Attack
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
59
Termite Attack
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
60
Termite Attack
4 Severe
Defect
Tilting / Differential Settlement

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
61

2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
62

4 Severe
Defect
Water Damage
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
63
Water Damage
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
64
5.2 IS-003 Tram Track

5.2.1 Scope
The purpose of this ACA is to outline the method associated with determining the current condition of
the overall tram track network based only on data obtained from a survey tram which measures track
geometry. It differs from most of the other Asset Subclasses, which describe a process to perform
manual inspections. As such, this Asset Subclass does not follow the same structure or ACA process
due to its unique requirements.
5.2.2 Pre-assessment Checks

Prior to the conduct of analysis, the following tasks are to be undertaken:
• Track attribute data is to be obtained.
• Network configuration attribute data is to be obtained.
• Survey data is to be obtained.
• Utilisation data is to be obtained.
• Asset, utilisation and network configuration data is to be reviewed for completeness by ensuring
the required attributes are available.
• Survey data is to be checked for completeness by ensuring the required attributes are available.
• Alignment of the asset, utilisation & network configuration data with survey data is checked to
ensure alignment of geographic co-ordinates.
• Frequency of survey data points across the network is to be checked, the track data should be
provided for every 10cm of track.
• Null and potential out of range values to be checked and excluded from the analysis.
5.2.3 Methodology
The methodology for determining the asset condition is to follow the process detailed by the following
sub-sections. This is intended as guidance to support the calculation steps in IS-003 in the MDR.
5.2.3.1 Inputs
Obtain and check all the latest required input data in accordance with the requirements contained in
IS-003 in the MDR for inputs.
In addition to the inputs identified in the MDR, the Junctions have been segmented but the asset
condition analysis has been conducted at a junction level primarily due to concerns about the ability to
accurately map survey data to the correct segment within a junction. If location accuracy of survey
data could be improved, it may be more appropriate to conduct the analysis at the segment level
within junctions to enable greater fidelity in the analysis of junctions.
5.2.3.2 Element Definition - Linear

Prior to the conduct of the analysis:
• Obtain the latest segmentation layer that describes the elements in the network.
• Review the against the current network. This is to include a review to ensure alignment of the
latest segmentation with the asset register.
• If there is misalignment, the affected sections of the network are to be updated and re-
segmented in accordance with the segmentation rules contained within IS-003 in the MDR.
If a previous segmentation exists, check if either the network, or the definitions of track types across
the network has changed, as this may negate the need to completely re-segment the network. Where
previous segmentation exists, updates to the segmentation shall retain the same segment
identification as the previous segmentation where there have been no changes to the network to allow
for the comparison of asset condition over time.
Apply data to network segmentation
• Apply asset attributes, utilisation attributes and network configuration attributes to the network
segmentation.
• Apply track survey data attributes to the network segmentation.
65
The required attributes & data to be applied to the segmentation can be found in IS-003 in the MDR
under the inputs requirements.
Example diagrams of the track types for segmentation are provided below to support the requirements
in the MDR.
Figure 5.2-1: Examples of CT Crossings (light green)
Figure 5.2-2: Example of H-Crossing (dark green)
Figure 5.2-3: Example of Crossover (Orange)

66
Figure 5.2-4: Example of Terminus (Purple)
Figure 5.2-5: Examples of Curves (Light Blue)
5.2.3.3 Asset Condition Analysis

The detailed methodology including background, explanations and formulae are contained within IS-
003 in the MDR. The following is a brief outline of the steps required to calculate the asset condition
for the network.
Table 5.2-1: Outline of asset condition methodology
Step Description
Defect Condition Ratings DCRs are calculated according to the following steps:
(DCR)
a. Calculate deflection of individual survey measurements vs the
nominal values (found in the MDR).
b. Calculate the mean deflection over a single segment.
c. Calculate the standard deviation of the deflection over a single
segment.
d. Calculate the DCR from a combination of the mean & standard
deviation.
e. Normalise the DCR between 1 and 5.
Asset Condition Ratings (ACR) The ACR combines the normalised DCR values for each segment:
a. Calculate an ACR for rail health.

b. Calculate an ACR for geometry health.
c. Calculate an overall ACR for the segment.
Assign calculated data All means, standard deviations, DCRs, normalised DCRs and ACRs are
then to be assigned to the network segmentation.
67

The below information is provided to support the required calculations outlined in IS-003 in the MDR.
Recommended Strategy for setting weighting confidence k:
1. When there is no prior knowledge about the track, this parameter can be set to 0.5.
2. The parameter can be adjusted based on historical data or Subject Matter Expert (SME)
knowledge. The tuned parameters should account for the method of degradation and the
expected mathematical outcome of a single defect.
3. When historical data shows that the i-th parameter deflection represents significant variation
over many track segments (number of segments to be set by SME) one can set k to be less
than 0.5.
4. When historical data suggests that the i-th parameter deflection has a large mean over many
track segments (number of segments to be set by SME) one can set k to be greater than 0.5.
5. For example:
6. Shock is likely to be more visible in standard deviation, whilst the mean may tend to zero. Shock
is likely to be best set on a k value less than 0.5.
7. Gauge defects are more likely to be charactered by a biasing in the deflection over the segment.
Gauge is likely to be best set on a k value greater than 0.5.
8. Overall, the purpose of k is to maximise the range, variability and resolution of the DCR over the
population.
Recommended Strategy for setting weighting confidence 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝒊 and 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒎𝒊𝒏

𝒊
• 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒊 𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝒎𝒊𝒏
and 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒊 should be populated in line with the exceedance values defined within
the asset class strategy for the i-th parameter.
• 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒎𝒂𝒙𝒊 should align with maximum exceedance before emergency work is required.
• 𝑫𝑪𝑹𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊 should align within the accepted tolerance of the i-th parameter.
Asset Condition Rating

The below information is provided to support the required calculations outlined in IS-003 in the MDR.
Recommended Strategy for setting ai, bi, w1 and w2:
1. Respective ai and bi should initially be set equal.
2. coefficients w1 and w2 should also be initially set as equal.
3. Based upon the analyst’s judgement, ai and bi should later be set when sufficient interventions
have occurred to enable an understanding of the primary driver of intervention for rail and
geometry based interventions respectively. This will weigh the respective (geometry or rail) ACR
towards the DCR which most likely to generate the intervention. The analyst may set these to
be zero for particular parameters if there is a view that the measurements for one or more
parameters are inaccurate and therefore should not contribute to the overall ACR ratings.
4. The coefficients w1 and w2 can be set upon the proportions at which interventions for geometry
versus rail ACR. This will weigh the overall ACR towards the defects most likely to generate an
intervention.
Note: The above strategy requires review, validation and adjustment against track survey data and
any additional SME guidance at the time of analysis. The analyst will need to consider the reciprocal
effect of biasing metrics towards interventions and increasing interventions for that parameter based
upon the updated metric.
Within the proposed methodology the auxiliary parameterisation act as data-driven probes that in turn
provide detailed insight into the condition of the underlying rail infrastructure. This supports data-driven
and informative asset management strategy.
68
5.2.4 Assurance
Review the outputs of the analysis, as specified in IS-003 in the MDR, to check for potential errors and
unexpected results, for example:
1. Missing calculated values.
2. Poor condition track which is new and subject to low usage.
3. Isolated single segments of poor condition – particularly straights.
4. Segments within a polygon have all been assigned the same unique polygon identifier.
If a future works plan exists, compare the worst-case sections identified by this analysis with the
proposed sections being renewed for alignment.
In some instances, it may be warranted to perform a limited physical inspection on specific sections of
the track with unexpected results to confirm the accuracy of the analysis.
5.2.5 Defect Guidance Information

The following diagrams provide guidance on the parameters used for this analysis.
Figure 5.2-6: Rail head wear diagram

69
Figure 5.2-7: Track twist diagram

70
5.3 IS-004 Tram Overhead Wiring

5.3.1 Scope
The purpose of this ACA is to outline the method associated with determining the current condition of
the overall tram overhead wire network based on data obtained from a survey tram which measures
wire geometry. It differs from most of the other Asset Subclasses, which describe a process to perform
manual inspections. As such, this Asset Subclass does not follow the same structure or ACA process
due to its unique requirements.
5.3.2 Pre-assessment Checks

• Overhead attribute data is to be obtained.
• Network configuration attribute data is to be obtained.
• Survey data is to be provided.
• Utilisation data is to be provided.
• Asset, utilisation and network configuration data is to be reviewed for completeness by ensuring
the required attributes are available.
• Survey data is to be checked for completeness by ensuring the required attributes are available.
• Alignment of the asset, utilisation and network configuration data is to be checked to ensure
alignment of geographic coordinates.
• Frequency of survey data points across the network is to be checked, the wire data should be
provided for every 1cm of wire.
• Null and potential out of range values to be checked and excluded from the analysis.
5.3.3 Methodology
The methodology for determining the asset condition is to follow the process detailed by the following
sub-sections. This is intended as guidance to support the calculation steps in IS-004 in the MDR.
5.3.3.1 Inputs
Obtain and check all the latest required input data in accordance with the requirements contained in
IS-004 in the MDR for inputs.
In addition to the inputs identified in the MDR, the following will also be considered where available:
• Cross-sectional area was not used due to current limitations in validating the survey data with
human inspections. It also did not have an available degradation relationship that provides high
confidence in the analysis as remaining thickness did. Cross section would provide a better
capture of the actual condition of the wire as opposed to the remaining thickness as it takes a
snapshot of the wire diameter.
• The Junctions have been segmented but the asset condition analysis has been conducted at a
junction level primarily due to concerns about the ability to accurately map survey data to the
correct segment within a junction. If location accuracy of survey data could be improved, it may
be more appropriate to conduct the analysis at the segment level within junctions to enable
greater fidelity in the analysis of junctions.
5.3.3.2 Element Definition - Linear

• Obtain the latest segmentation layer.
• Review the segmentation layer against the current network. This is to include a review to ensure
alignment of the latest segmentation with the asset register.
• If there is misalignment, the affected sections of the network are to be updated and re-
segmented in accordance with the segmentation rules contained in IS-003 Tram Track.
71
If a previous segmentation exists, check if either the network, or the definitions of track types in IS-003
across the network has changed, as this may negate the need to completely re-segment the network.
Where previous segmentation exists, updates to the segmentation shall retain the same segment
identification as the previous segmentation where there have been no changes to the network to allow
for the comparison of asset condition over time.
Apply data to network segmentation
• Apply asset attributes, utilisation attributes and network configuration attributes to the network
segmentation.
• Apply track survey data attributes to the network segmentation.
These can be found in the MDR under the inputs requirements.
5.3.3.3 Asset Condition Analysis

The detailed methodology including background, explanations and formulae are contained within IS-
004 in the MDR. The following is a brief outline of the steps required to calculate the asset condition
for the network.
Table 5.3-1: Outline of asset condition methodology
Step Description
Defect Condition Ratings DCRs are based on using ‘remaining wire thickness’ taken from the
(DCR) collected monitoring data by the Franchisee. The classification of the
thickness data can be found in the MDR. The following is a description
of the three DCRs used, with more detail available in the MDR.
• Average thickness of segment: This DCR captures uniform wear
over the segment length.
• Noise-reduced minimum thickness value: This DCR shows a
conservative ‘minimum’ thickness value, while limiting the impact of
noise in the data.
• Dynamic distancing: This DCR determines whether present thin
spots in a segment are clustered and can therefore be spliced
locally or they are dispersed, and an intervention is required.
Asset Condition Ratings The ACR combines the three DCR assignments in order to determine
(ACR) an overall asset health. More detail is available in the MDR.
Assign calculated data All calculated values, DCRs, and ACRs are then to be assigned to the
network segmentation.

The calculation steps for determine the DCRs are outline in IS-004 in the MDR. The following DCRs
will be calculated:
• Average thickness of segment
• Noise-reduced minimum thickness value
• Dynamic distancing.
Asset Condition Rating

The calculation steps to determine the ACR are outlined in IS-004 the MDR.
5.3.4 Assurance
Review the outputs of the analysis, as specified in IS-004 the MDR, to check for potential errors and
unexpected results, for example:
• missing calculated values.
• poor condition overhead wire which is new and subject to low usage.
• isolated single segments of poor condition.
• Segments within a polygon have all been assigned the same unique polygon identifier.
72
If a future works plan exists, compare the worst-case sections identified by this analysis with the
proposed sections being renewed for alignment.
In some instances, it may be warranted to perform a limited physical inspection on specific sections of
the Overhead Wires with unexpected results to confirm the accuracy of the analysis.
5.3.5 Defect Guidance Information

The following diagrams provide guidance on the parameters used for this analysis.
Figure 5.3-1: Overhead Wire: Remaining wire thickness

73
5.4 IS-010 Bridges, Subways & Culverts

5.4.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect bridges, subways, and culverts. Bridges include rail bridges
(underbridge), road bridges (overbridge), and footbridges, and are a structure built to span a physical
obstruction. Road bridges are characterised by enabling traffic to cross them and may be
accompanied by pedestrian walkways. A culvert is a tunnel or structure which allows water to flow
under an obstruction. A subway is a large culvert (not conveying water) or bridge type structure which
allows pedestrian traffic to travel under an obstruction. The following is a list of assets in scope:
• Bridges and Culverts
• Overbridges
• Underbridges
• Footbridges
• Tunnels
• Subways
• Culverts.

Asset Subclass specific instructions are as per below, to be followed in conjunction with the general
condition assessment process (Figure 1).
In addition to the general inspection instructions, it is recommended for this Asset Subclass to take
general photographs of the asset – elevation from each side, soffit view, deck view and view from
bridge looking left and right.

The following defect specific TPM processes apply to this Asset Subclass as per the TPM library:
Corrosion (Pitting / Section Loss) Option 1 Table 6-6
Cracking (General) Option 2 Table 6-11
Cracking (Welds) Table 6-15
Differential Settlement Option 2 Table 6-19
Pipe Rot Table 6-32
Scouring Table 6-40
Snipe Table 6-43
Spalling Option 2 Table 6-45
Surface Rot Table 6-47
Termite Attack Table 6-48
Tilting Option 2 Table 6-51
74

Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
75
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
76
Cracking (Concrete)
4 Severe
Defect
Cracking (Masonry)
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
77
Cracking (Masonry)
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
Cracking (Shrinkage)
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
78
Cracking (Shrinkage)
3 Major
Defect

Defect
Deformation
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate Not available

Defect
3 Major Not available
Defect
Defect
79
Mortar Loss
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
80
Spalling
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
81
Spalling
4 Severe
Defect
Splitting / Splintering
Condition Defect
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
82
Surface Rot
Condition Defect
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
83
5.5 IS-025 Platforms

5.5.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect the Asset Subclass of Platforms. A Platform is defined as a structure that
allows the embarking and disembarking of passengers from trains or trams, and a passageway to the
station or stop exit. Types of platforms include:
• Elevated platforms (EP): Platforms that are supported by framing, usually either concrete, steel
or timber, this includes platforms on elevated rail structures.
• Retained earth platforms (REP): platforms consisting of retaining walls containing earth fill and a
paved or unpaved surface. The type of retaining wall varies throughout the network and within
stations. Most platforms on the rail and tram networks are of the retained earth type.
• Raised platforms (RP): platforms that are raised platforms on a road (commonly known as Tram
Super Stops) are considered to be retained earth platforms. Tram stops that are unformed at
roadside kerbs or at-grade on roads are not considered.
Additional structures built on top of the platform (e.g., awnings and non-protective fences/handrails)
are not components of this Asset Subclass and are not included in this inspection. Barriers that protect
against falls greater than 1m are included.

In addition to the general inspection instructions, the following additional steps are recommended for
this Asset Subclass:
• It is anticipated that most platform inspections will be able to be conducted from other platforms
or vantage points without requiring line occupations or Track Force Protection.
• However, inspection of elevated platform substructures may require line occupations with
support of a Track Force Protection Coordinator.

Corrosion (Section Loss) Option 1 Table 6-7
Differential Settlement Options 1 & 2 Table 6-18 & Table 6-19
Tilting Options 1 & 2 Table 6-50 & Table 6-51
84

Corrosion (Section Loss)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
85
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
86
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect
Cracking (Masonry)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
87
Cracking (Masonry)
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
88
Differential Settlement
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
89
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
90
Missing/Failed Elements (connections)

Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
Missing or Loose Bricks/tiles/Mortar Loss

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
91
Missing or Loose Bricks/tiles/Mortar Loss

3 Major
Defect

Defect
Rotting
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
92
Rotting
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
Spalling
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
93
Spalling
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
94
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
Tilting
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
95
Tilting
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
96
Tilting
4 Severe
Defect
97
5.6 IS-029 Lifts & Escalators

5.6.1 Scope
Lifts and Escalators provide vertical transport for passengers between platforms, concourses, and
street levels. Each asset is required by law to be maintained by licenced contractors (service provider)
through regular maintenance plans. Assets covered under the scope of this document are:
• Electric Lifts
• Hydraulic Lifts
• Escalators.

In addition to the general inspection instructions, regular maintenance routines are to be conducted
and documented for this Asset Subclass. These maintenance details are used to support the System
Performance Analysis on all lift and escalator types to help separate actual failures vs routine
preventive maintenance tasks. The following maintenance items are recommended for maintenance of
both hydraulic and electric lifts and escalators:
Electrical Lift Maintenance Items
Electric lifts
Area • Component – Check.
General • Housekeeping - All components are clean; free from dust and corrosion.
• Electric wiring – Insulation.
• Pit area - For excess oil/grease at bottom of guides; area is clean, dry and free
Pit from debris.
• Anti-rebound device and switch - For free movement and operation; for equal
tension of ropes; switch (where fitted); lubrication.
• Buffers - Oil level; lubrication; switch (where fitted); fixings; operation.
• Electric safety devices – Operation.
• Drive motor/generator - Bearings for wear; lubrication; commutator condition.
• Gear box - Gear for wear; lubrication.
• Traction sheave - Condition and grooves for wear.
Machine
• Brake - Braking system; parts for wear; stopping accuracy.
Room
• Controller - Cabinet is clean, dry and free from dust.
• Overspeed governor and tension pulley - Moving parts for free movement and
wear; operation; switch.
• Main rope diverter pulley(s) - Condition and grooves for wear; bearings for
abnormal noise and/or vibrations; guarding; lubrication.
• Suspension ropes/chains - For wear, elongation and tension; lubrication only
where intended.
• Rope/chains terminations - For deterioration and wear; fixings.
• Safety gear(s)/ascending car overspeed - Moving parts for free movement and
wear; lubrication; fixings; operation; switch protection means.
• Motor run time limiter – Operation.
• Electric safety devices - Operation; electric safety chain; correct fuses are fitted.
• Car/counterweight guides - For film of oil where required on all guide surfaces,
fixings.
• Car/counterweight guide shoes - Guide shoes/rollers for wear; fixings;
Well lubrication where necessary.
where intended.
• Rope/chains terminations - For deterioration and wear; fixings.
• Final limit switches – Operation.
• Well lighting – Operation.
• Electric safety devices - Operation; electric safety chain.
98
Electric lifts
• Lift car - Emergency lighting, car buttons, key switches; fixings of panels and
ceiling.
• Landing entrances - Operation of landing locks; doors for free running; door
guiding; door gaps; wire rope, chain or belt when used, for integrity; emergency
External unlocking device; lubrication.
• Car door - Door closed contact or lock; doors for free running; door guiding;
door gaps; wire rope or chain when used for integrity; passenger door protective
device; lubrication.
• Floor level - Stopping accuracy at landing.
• Emergency alarm device – Operation.
• Landing controls and indicators – Operation.
99
Hydraulic Lift Maintenance Items

Hydraulic lifts
General • Housekeeping - All components are clean; free from dust and corrosion.
• Electric wiring – Insulation.
• Pit area – For excess oil/grease at bottom of guides; pit area is clean, dry and
Pit free from debris.
• Buffers - Oil level; lubrication; switch where fitted; fixings.
• Electric safety devices Operation.
Machine • Tank unit - Hydraulic fluid level; tank and valve unit for leakage.
room • Controller - Cabinet is clean, dry and free from dust.
• Pressure relief valve – Operation.
• Manual lowering valve – Operation.
• Hand pump – Operation.
• Motor run time limiter – Operation.
• Electric safety devices - Operation; electric safety chain; correct fuses are fitted.
• Hose/pipe work - For damage and leakage.
• Jack - For oil leakage.
• Telescopic jack - For synchronisation.
• Overspeed governor - and tension pulley Moving parts for free movement and
wear; operation; switch.
• Main rope pulley(s) - Condition and grooves for wear; bearings for abnormal
noise and/or vibrations; guarding.
Well • Car Balancing weight/jack guides - For film of oil where required on all guide
surfaces; fixings.
• Car Balancing weight/jack shoes - Guide shoes/rollers for wear; fixings.
• Safety gear/pawl/clamping devices - Moving parts for free movement and wear;
fixings; operation; switch.
where intended.
• Ropes/Chains terminations – For deterioration and wear; fixings.
• Lighting – Operation.
• Limit switch – Operation.
• Electric safety devices - Operation; electric safety chain.
• Anti-creep device – Operation.
• Rupture valve/One way - restrictor Operation.
• Hose/Pipe work - For damage and leakage.
• Lift car - Emergency lighting, car buttons, key switches; fixing of panels and
ceiling.
• Landing entrances - Operation of landing locks; doors for free running; door
guiding; door gaps; wire rope.
• Chain belt when used, for integrity; emergency unlocking device; lubrication.
External • Car door - Door closed contact or lock; doors for free running; door guiding; door
gaps; wire rope when used for integrity; passenger door protective device;
lubrication.
• Floor level - Stopping accuracy at landing.
• Emergency alarm device – Operation.
• Landing controls and indicators – Operation.
100
Escalator Maintenance Items

Escalators
• Controller - Cabinet is clean, dry and free from dust.
Machine • Gear box - Gear and associated parts; lubrication.
• Drive motor - Bearings for wear; lubrication.
• Brake - Braking system; parts for wear.
• Auxiliary brake - Braking system; parts for wear.
• Intermediate gear box - Gear and associated parts; lubrication.
• Main drive chain - For tension and wear; lubrication.
• Step/Pallet chain - For tension and wear; lubrication.
• Step/pallet - Step/pallet and step/pallet wheels for integrity.
• Conveyor belt - For condition and tension.
• Drive - belt - For condition and tension.
• Track - system - For condition and wear; fixings.
• Safety devices – Operation.
• Clearances - Step to step and step to skirting clearances.
External • Combs - Condition; meshing with steps, pallets or belt.
• Combs plate - Clearances and operation.
• Handrails - For free running and condition; tension; synchronisation.
• Safety devices – Operation.
• Deflector devices – Condition.
• Display – Operation.
• Lighting – Operation.
• Signs/Pictograms – Condition.
• Balustrade - Condition of panels; fixings of interior claddings.
• Controls – Operation.
• Unobstructed access – Availability.

No Technical Performance Measures are applicable to this Asset Subclass.

No example defect pictures/photographs are available for this Asset Subclass.
101
5.7 IS-030 Fire Hydrants & Pump Systems

5.7.1 Scope
Fire Hydrants and Pump Systems are Life Safety Systems that is designed to provide water at
sufficient pressure and flow for firefighters to effectively fight fires from hydrant positions. This is to be
used to assess the following elements:
• Fire water tank
• Pump set enclosure (outdoor canopy).

In addition to the general inspection instructions, if any LV Switchgear is identified alongside the
inspection of assets these are to be assessed in accordance with IS-077.


102
5.8 IS-032 Retaining Walls

5.8.1 Scope
A Retaining Wall is defined as a structure that prevents a mass of soil from eroding, sliding or
collapsing. Retaining Walls may employ various mechanisms such as soil anchoring, self-weight and
cantilever designs to resist the pressure exerted by soil. Apart from fences or barriers, additional
structures built on top of the Retaining Wall (e.g. signage) are not components and are not to be
included in the inspection of Retaining Walls.


Water Behind Structure Table 6-56

Corrosion
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
103
Corrosion
Defect
Defect
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect Not available
Defect
104
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
105
Erosion
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
106

2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
107
Missing or Loose Bricks/Tiles/Mortar Loss

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
Overturning (Tilting)
Condition Defect
rating 2 Moderate
Defect
108
Overturning (Tilting)
3 Major
Defect

Defect
Rotting
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
109
Rotting
3 Major
Defect

Defect
Spalling
Condition Defect
Defect
3 Major
Defect

Defect
110
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
111
5.9 IS-035 Buffer Stops

5.9.1 Scope
Buffer stops are defined as a structure erected across and at the end of a track at main line terminals
or dead-end sidings which is intended to stop overrunning rolling stock. Buffer Stops also can provide
protection for infrastructure and are a safety feature for nearby persons. The Train and Tram
Franchisees use a variety of different end protection that can be placed into two categories, steady
resistance, and sudden impact.


Cracking (General) Option 2* Table 6-11
Rotting – Timber Option 1 Table 6-38
*For IS-035 (Buffer Stops): In addition, use the tape measure to obtain the distance from the stress
raised point such as bolt holes, welds, connections.

112
5.10 IS-039 At Grade Carparks

5.10.1 Scope
At grade carparks are associated with all car parks that accompanying the buildings or otherwise.
The elements of the car park are:
• Kerbs and Channels
• Surface.


Cracking (General) – Option 1 Table 6-10
Potholes Table 6-34
Spalling – Option 2 Table 6-45
Uplift / Heave Table 6-54

113
5.11 IS-041 OHWS, Attachments & Signal Gantries

5.11.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect Overhead Wiring Structures (OHWS), Signal Gantries and Attachments.


Deflection Option 1 Table 6-16
Deflection Option 2 Table 6-17
Fraying Table 6-24
Impact Damage Table 6-25
Settlement Option 1 Table 6-41
Settlement Option 2 Table 6-42

No example defect pictures are available for this Asset Subclass.
114
5.12 IS-042 Poles

5.12.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the condition of Poles. Poles are defined as a long and slender structure
that is erected to support equipment at height. Poles can be partially buried in the ground using the
soil to provide bearing support or fixed to foundations using structural fasteners.
The following are included in the scope of this document:
• Electrical Poles (Low Voltage, High Voltage, Electrolysis)
• Light Poles
• Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Poles
• Overhead Support Poles
• Signal Poles/Posts
• Support structures and anchors for poles.


Impact Damage Table 6-25
Settlement Option 1 or Option 2 Table 6-41 or Table 6-42
Tilting Option 1 or Option 2 Table 6-50 or Table 6-51
Timber Loss Table 6-53
115

Corrosion
Defect 1 Minor Defect
Condition Painted/coated surface
rating in cracked or bubbly.
Powdery deposits
present.
Surface coating has
been comprised.
2 Moderate Defect Not Available

Rusty red, black or white
corrosion deposits are
present.
Minor flaking.
3 Major Defect Not Available
Etching and pitting
present.
Granular condition.
4 Severe Defect Not Available
Metal penetrated
through.
116
Cracking (Concrete)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
117
5.13 IS-050 Level Crossings & Protection

5.13.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect the asset class of Level Crossings and Protection. Level crossings are
defined as any at-grade crossing of an active rail corridor and are a combination of boom gates,
crossing road surface and other components that are critical to the safe running of a level crossing.
Protection is categorised into alarm systems and security access gates. An alarm system is defined
as a system of electrical and electronic devices collectively designed to detect the presence of an
intruder and alert or warn as part of an emergency response system and also to alert traffic and
pedestrians at a level crossing of the presence of a train. A security access gate is defined as any gate
or barrier that limits or restricts public access to a property.


Boom Gate / Pedestrian Gate Operation (Timing) Table 6-3
Differential Settlement Option 1 or Option 2 Table 6-18 & Table 6-19
Rutting Table 6-39
Splitting / Splintering Table 6-46
Uplift / Heave Table 6-54
118

Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
119
Corrosion (Surface)
4 Severe
Defect
Cracking (concrete/asphalt)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
120
Cracking (concrete/asphalt)
2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
121
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect
122
3 Major
Defect

Defect
Missing/Failed Elements/Connections
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
123
Missing/Failed Elements/Connections
4 Severe
Defect
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
124
UV Damage (Plastic/Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Enclosures)

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
125
5.14 IS-051 Drainage

5.14.1 Scope
Drainage assets are defined as any structure or system intended to provide collection or diversion of
stormwater for removal from station, track or tram facilities, including platforms, buildings, pedestrian
paths, rail infrastructure and car parks. Examples include but are not limited to:
• Cess drains
• Culverts (<300mm)
• Gross pollutant traps
• Headwalls
• Permeable pavements
• Pit and pipe networks
• Rain gardens
• Strip drains
• Subsurface drains
• Swales and catch drains
• Tree pits.


Collapse Table 6-5
Erosion / Scour Table 6-22
Mould / Algae Table 6-28
Vegetation Health Table 6-55
Water Damage / Ponding Water Table 6-57
126

Missing/Failed Elements
Condition Defect
Defect
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
127
5.15 IS-053 Embankments and Cuttings

5.15.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect the asset class of Embankments & Cuttings. Embankments are defined
as a bank of earth or stone built to carry a road or railway over an area of low ground. Cuttings are
defined as a narrow valley cut through the earth to carry a road or railway below the adjacent ground
level.
The following elements are considered in scope where applicable:
Embankments:
• Embankment Face
• Erosion Control Grid / Layer
• Open Channel Drainage – both of earthen and non-earthen material, which are integral to the
function and stability of the embankment.
• Vegetation.
Cuttings:
• Cutting Face
• Erosion Control Grid / Layer
• Ground Anchors / Rock Bolts
• Open Channel Drainage – both of earthen and non-earthen material, which are integral to the
function and stability of the embankment.

In addition to the general inspection instructions, it is recommended for this Asset Subclass that if the
component is associated with Drainage, refer to IS-051 Drainage.


128
5.16 IS-058 Signals

5.16.1 Scope
Signals are the visual display that communicates driver instructions in the system used to manage rail
traffic. Signals are a system used to direct railway traffic and keep trains clear of each other at all
times. Railway signals are a visual display device that conveys instructions or provides advance
warning of instructions regarding the driver’s authority to proceed. The driver interprets the signal's
indication and acts accordingly. Both the Train and Tram Network Franchisees use several different
signals of mechanical, incandescent, and Light Emitting Diode (LED) variety. Signals are controlled by
train detection systems, which detect the presence of trains to determine movement authority and alter
signal aspect display accordingly.
The components associated with Signals are detailed in Table 5.16-1 below. This table provides for
each component, the guidelines that are to be used for the condition assessment of the component,
and which asset that the outputs of the assessment should be reported against.
Table 5.16-1: Signals Components
Component Defect, System Performance and Asset that the analysis
Supportability Assessment outputs are to be
Guidance reported against
Small Power & Control Cables IS-078 IS-078

• Refer to IS-078 Small Power & Control Cables to perform a detailed condition assessment
regarding suitable wiring protection.

129

Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Conditio Defect
n rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
Mechanical Damage / Thermal Degradation

Defect 1 Minor
Conditio Defect
n rating
130
Mechanical Damage / Thermal Degradation

2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
131
5.17 IS-061 Power Supply & Signalling Enclosures

5.17.1 Scope
Power Supply & Signalling Enclosure assets in the train and tram network consist of enclosures
supplying power to signalling and communications equipment (refer this section), and the cabling
between the enclosures and field equipment (refer IS-078 Small Power and Control Cables).



132
5.18 IS-063 Signal Points – Manual & Spring Loaded

5.18.1 Scope
Manual & Spring-Loaded Points are Tram Network assets that form a critical part of the tramway
signalling infrastructure, they enable safe guidance of trams from one track to another and allow
selection of routes by point blade positioning. The Manual & Spring-Loaded Points components
assessed are:
• Mechanical parts (Springs, lever, drive rod and blades/points)
• Road box and road box cover.



Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
133

2 Modera
te
Defect
3 Major
Defect
134

4 Severe
Defect
Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
135
Corrosion (Surface)
2 Modera
te
Defect

Defect
Defect
136
5.19 IS-064 Signal Points – Powered Machines

5.19.1 Scope
Signal Points – Powered Machines are a critical part of the tramway signalling infrastructure as they
enable safe guidance of trams from one track to another and allow selection of routes by point blade
positioning. The Tram Network Franchisee uses a variety of Signal Points – Powered Machines in the
network. This assessment will not include manual and spring-loaded machines (see IS-063 Large
Power Cables) or auto point controllers (see IS-065 Signal Points – Point Controller).

The following photographs can be used as a guide to aid in the identification of components during an
inspection. Figure 5.19-1 and Figure 5.19-2 are the current models that are being installed when
possible on the network.
Figure 5.19-1: Powered Machine Guidance Photograph 1 taken from MR4 – Technical Maintenance Plans –
Infrastructure
137
Figure 5.19-2: Powered Machine Guidance Photograph 2 taken from MR4 – Franchise Infrastructure
Management Plan


Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
138

2 Moderate
Defect
3 Major
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
139
Corrosion (Surface)
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating
2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
140
5.20 IS-065 Signal Points – Point Controller

5.20.1 Scope
The Tram Network Franchisee’s Autopoint Controllers are a critical part of the tramway signalling
infrastructure, they enable the automated switching of a point from one route to another. This
assessment will not include the powered machine power supply, Signal Points - Powered Machines
(IS-064) or Signal Points - Manual & Spring-Loaded (IS-063). The Point Controller components
assessed are:
• Above Ground Autopoint Equipment
o Controller Unit (Microprocessor only. All relay controllers currently in service are to be
renewed)
o Autopoint Cabinet (IS-061 – Power Supply & Signalling Enclosures for trains)
o Cable Management and Wiring (IS-078 Small Power and Control Cables)
o Autopoint on-tram transponder (supportability check).
• In Ground Autopoint Equipment
o Track Circuit (supportability check)
o Mass detector (supportability check)
o Transponder loop (supportability check).
The components associated with Signal Points – Point Controller are detailed in Table 5.20-1 below.
This table provides for each component, the guidelines that are to be used for the condition
assessment of the component, and which asset that the outputs of the assessment should be reported
against.
Table 5.20-1: Components
Small power and control cables IS-078 IS-078
Cabinets OC-004 OC-004

• Refer to OC-004 Cabinets for detailed condition assessment of the Cabinet condition if the initial
cabinet inspection determines any signs of degradation.
• Refer to IS-078 Small Power & Control Cables to perform a detailed condition assessment
regarding suitable wiring protection.

141

Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
Defect
142
5.21 IS-067 Switches

5.21.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect the Asset Class of Switches associated with the Overhead wiring.
Switches (Overhead wiring) are defined as the electrical isolation devices that are intended to switch
power from the feeders in a substation to the overhead wiring conductors that provide power to the
rolling stock. Examples include but are not limited to:
• Isolation switches
• Bypass switches
• Jumper switches.


Flashover Table 6-23
Overheating Table 6-30

143
5.22 IS-068 Section Insulators

5.22.1 Scope
Section insulators are defined as overhead line components intended to provide electrical isolation
between sections of the overhead network while allowing trains or trams to move between them
without hindrance. This asset class is applicable to both the train and tram network.


Over-Temperature Table 6-31
Pollution Table 6-33
Wear Table 6-58

144
5.23 IS-069 Earthing & Bonding

5.23.1 Scope
This section is used to assess the condition of the earthing and bonding systems at facilities and
stations, isolating transformers, line side power equipment huts, pole and station bonding, sidings,
traction Substations, within the Melbourne Underground Rail Loop (MURL), and at workshops.

MURL:
1. A representative section of each tunnel shall be walked and the condition of twin tunnel earth
bonding cables recorded at each cross bond and terminations for the defined tunnel section.
2. Note GPS coordinates are not applicable in the MURL. However, recording the location of the
earthing bonding cables can be done by recording the metres from Flinders Station. The
distance is marked on the walls.
Earthing System:
1. Source drawings/documentation of the earthing system of the given asset to understand and
locate the main components of the earthing system such as the earthing electrode(s), earthing
system connections in the earth rod pits, the main earth bar, the Voltage Limiting Device (VLD)
(traction substations only) – if installed, other equipotential earth bonds such as security fencing,
framework, and other metallic components.
2. Note that VLDs will be located in all traction substations on the train network, and some traction
substation for the Tram network. They will not be present in tram network areas where the rail is
earthed (i.e. uninsulated rail cast in concrete or asphalt.)
3. The inspector shall also record the manufacturer of the VLD.
Spark Gap (Train Network):

1. A system containing a spark gap will contain the following components: bonding cable, spark
gap, spark gap housing and bonds to rail and structure.
2. The inspector shall also record whether the spark gap fitted is the Victorian Railways Type or
the Dehn type.
Pole Bonds (Tram Network):

1. Pole bonds are a bonding cable (or cables) from the base of a metal pole to rail. These bonds
are found at each pole with electrical equipment attached (e.g. Aerial Switches, Automatic
Sectionalising Switches and Surge Diverters) and every ten poles in plain track (every
approximately every 300m). There are no bonds on timber poles including timber poles with
electrical equipment. Pillar boxes are also bonded to rail.
2. Pole ponds will also be found at Tram Super stops.
3. The bond to rail will only be visible on plain ballasted track. All bonds are welded to the foot of
the rail.
145

Fraying Table 6-24
Resistance / Continuity Testing – Earthing System Table 6-35
Resistance / Continuity Testing – Tram Pole Bonds Table 6-36

146
5.24 IS-071 HV AC Switchgear

5.24.1 Scope
High Voltage Alternating Current (HV AC) Switchgear operates at high voltage (above 1.0 kV AC) and
consists of HV AC switchboards, and the equipment contained therein. The following are included in
the scope of this document:
• Enclosure
• HV Connection
• Switching Mechanism.


Chipping Table 6-4

147
5.25 IS-072 Transformers

5.25.1 Scope
This is to be used to inspect the Asset Subclass of Transformers. Transformers can be applied to
either oil or dry insulation type with various inputs (primary) and outputs (secondary) voltages. Types
of transformers include:
• Auxiliary transformer
• Essential services transformer
• Isolating transformer
• Rectifier transformer
• Signal transformer.

In addition to the general inspection instructions, the following is recommended for this Asset Subclass
as part of the general visual inspection:
a. Transformer housing – take note of:
o Visible corrosion and foreign containments on the outside surface of the tank such as,
welds joints, nuts, bolts, metal corrosion.
o Visible signs of cracking or metal fatigue
o Evidence of water ingress.
b. Conservator & Radiator Cooling System
o Visible sign of oil leakage. Attention should be provided to areas around gaskets, flanges,
pumps, pipe joints, and welds
o Visible corrosion and foreign contaminants on the outside surface of the system such as
weld joints, nuts, bolts, metal corrosion.

Chipping Table 6-4
Electrical Arcing / Burning Table 6-21
Oil Leakage Table 6-29

148
5.26 IS-073 Rectifiers

5.26.1 Scope
The train and tram Franchisees have numerous rectifiers within the rail network. Rectifiers are located
in substations and function to rectify Alternating Current (AC) supply into the appropriate Direct
Current (DC) traction power voltage to the respective tram/train overhead wire network. The
components which will be assessed include:
• Diodes
• Diode fuses (where fitted)
• Heat Sinks
• Monitoring control cables (refer IS-078 Small Power and Control Cables)
• Rectifier Unit cabling and Terminations (refer IS-075 Large Power Cables)
• Rectifier Unit cabinets (refer OC-004 Cabinets).



149
5.27 IS-074 DC Switchgear

5.27.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess Direct Current (DC) Switchgear with respect to the following elements:
• Switching Mechanism.



150
5.28 IS-075 Large Power Cables

5.28.1 Scope
The Large Power Cables distribute large quantities of electrical power within the train and tram
network, which includes:
• 1500 Volt (V) and 600V Direct Current (DC) Traction (including Traction Negative Return)
• 650V, 1000V, 2200V, 3300V and 6600V signal or essential services power distribution
• 6.6kV, 11kV and 22kV feeders
• Rectifier AC Cables
• Any other equipment operating at the nominal voltages of 650V or above.

In addition to the general inspection instructions, the following additional guidance is given for this
Asset Class when performing visual inspections for inspectors to take note of which may indicate signs
of failure.
• Colour. Discolouration of the cable can be an indication of exposure to excessive heat. Key
metrics for identifying discolouration include;
o Deviation from the original sheath colour,
o Change in shape and texture of the sheath (bubbling, elongation).
• Sheath damage. Degradation of the sheath can be attributed to atmospheric ozone, oxygen
and ultraviolet light, which breaks down the polymer bonds. The addition of heat to any of these
will act as a catalyst. Damage to the sheath is an indication of performance or mechanical
degradation that could lead to the future failure along the cable insulation. Key metrics for
identifying sheath damage include:
o Cracks
o Perforations rubbing
o Embrittlement of the sheath.

Mechanical Damage Table 6-26
Thermal Degradation Table 6-49
151

Mechanical Damage
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
152
Thermal Degradation
Condition Defect
Defect
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
153
5.29 IS-077 LV Switchgear

5.29.1 Scope
Low Voltage (LV) Switchgear include the elements of switchboard assemblies, electrical main
switchboards (MSBs), distribution boards (DBs) and external pillars.


Cracking (Busbar Insulation) Table 6-14

Cracking
Condition Defect
Rating 2 Moderate
Defect

Defect
Defect
154
5.30 IS-078 Small Power & Control Cables

5.30.1 Scope
Small power and control cables include:
• AC Cables between 0V and 500V
• Ripple free DC voltage cables between 0V and 1500V
• State DC Control Cables – 400/415V.

Small Power and Control Cables are to be visually examined for damage and deterioration of the
sheath as far as reasonably practicable. Visual inspection is performed using the naked eye to assess
the physical condition of the asset, identify the location of the damage, degradation type and severity
or other signs of wear in the appearance.
Colour
Discolouration of the cable can be an indication of exposure to excessive heat. Key metrics for
identifying discolouration include:
• Deviation from the original sheath colour,
• Change in shape and texture of the sheath (bubbling, elongation).
Sheath damage
Degradation of the sheath can be attributed to atmospheric ozone, oxygen and ultraviolet light, which
breaks down the polymer bonds. The addition of heat to any of these will act as a catalyst. Damage to
the sheath is an indication of performance or mechanical degradation that could lead to the future
failure along the cable insulation. Key metrics for identifying sheath damage include:
• Cracks
• Perforation rubbing
• Embrittlement of the sheath.

Mechanical Damage Table 6-26
Thermal Degradation Table 6-49
155

Mechanical Damage
Defect 1 Minor
Condition Defect
rating

Defect
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
156
Thermal Degradation
Condition Defect
Defect
Defect
4 Severe
Defect
157
5.31 IS-079 DC Battery & Charger Systems

5.31.1 Scope
DC Batteries and Charger Systems are defined as a standby source of energy to the primary AC
supply system. The assets under management that are considered in scope are located predominately
within substations which include 24V, 32V, 50V, 110V and 125V substation ancillary services. This is
to be used to assess the following elements:
• Battery
• Charger.


Battery Resistance Table 6-2

158
5.32 IS-081 Protection Relays & Systems

5.32.1 Scope
Protection Relays and Systems monitor electrical systems and trip a circuit breaker when a fault
condition is detected. Protection relays monitor the voltage, current and in some cases the load within
the network via the outputs of current transformers and voltage transformers. This is to be used to
assess the following element:
• Protection relays.



159
5.33 IS-083 Lighting

5.33.1 Scope
Lighting refers to all lights associated with infrastructure, and not Rolling Stock (see RS-008 Lighting
for Rolling Stock).
This includes the following elements:
• Fittings
• Mounting accessories
• Lighting control systems (including standalone lighting control systems, such as motion sensors
and photoelectric (PE) cells, and networked lighting control systems).
The components associated with Lighting are detailed in Table 5.33-1 below. This table provides for
Table 5.33-1: Lighting Components
LV Switchgear IS-077 IS-077
Small Power and Control Cables IS-078 IS-078
Poles IS-042 IS-042

• If any lighting is mounted to a pole, the pole itself needs also needs to be assessed against IS-
042.


160
5.34 IS-095 UPS Systems

5.34.1 Scope
Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems are defined as a system that provides stored 400/230v
AC emergency power to a load when the input power source (usually the mains power) fails. A UPS
also continually provides ‘clean’ power regulating the voltage and frequency of the electricity supplied
to the load. The assets under management that are considered in ACAP scope include 400/230v UPS
systems as part of major control rooms (eg Centrol, Electrol) and the train network Essential Services
Distribution System (ESDS).
The UPS system comprises:
• Batteries
• Electronic Assembly – comprised of electronic components to convert the input supply to DC,
charge the battery, and invert the battery supply to AC as well as provide monitoring and control
functions
• External maintenance bypass switch
• Miscellaneous components such as: external battery enclosure / supports; and cables / link bars
connecting the batteries to each other and to other parts of the UPS, circuit breakers,
switchboard controls.

• Assess whether the cabinet is free from signs of damage, corrosion, and deformation.
• Assess whether batteries are bulged/deformed
• Assessment of battery post tops for corrosion.

Battery Float Current Table 6-1
Battery Resistance Table 6-2
161

Damage type Damage Rating Sample Photographs
Terminal 0
corrosion/electrolyte
leakage
No evident electrolyte leakage noticeable in the battery room.

2
Small quantities of electrolyte observed. Spill area less than 5cm

dia. No more the one location.
3
Multiple quantities on electrolyte observed. Spill area less than

5cm dia.
4
Any quantities of electrolyte observed greater than 5cm dia.

162
5.35 OC-001 Software & Applications

5.35.1 Scope
Software and applications are defined as a set of instructions, data or programs used to execute
specific tasks. This definition includes Operating Systems (e.g. Windows and Linux) and Asset
Information Management Systems (e.g. Ellipse and Maximo).
This is used to assess the condition of both:
• An individual software asset
• Software components at a subsystem level that contribute towards deriving a system level asset
condition of a ‘parent’ system. For these ‘parent’ systems there are separate, dedicated
available Asset Subclasses (e.g. Train Control and Monitoring System (TCMS) and Automated
Vehicle Monitoring (AVM) system) which outline the decision framework and method for the
entire system and refer to this document to complete the condition assessment of the software
components of the system. The results shall be incorporated into the ‘parent’ system condition
assessment.



163
5.36 OC-003 Workstations, Servers and Storage

5.36.1 Scope
Workstations are defined as a computer, display, keyboard, mouse, and associated local cabling.
Servers and storage are defined as the infrastructure that hosts and stores applications and data.
This document is to be used to assess the following:
• Specialised computers used for workstations supporting operational systems (e.g. Digital Train
Radio System (DTRS) and AVM System)
• All servers and storage maintained by the Franchisees, including those located in externally
managed commercial data centres. These may also be referred to as:
o Storage Area Network
o Virtualisation
o Backup and Recovery.



164
5.37 OC-004 Cabinets

5.37.1 Scope
Cabinets are defined as a housing containing storage racks for protecting and managing network,
electrical and electronic devices. Franchisees use a variety of Operational Control and Management
Systems (OCMS) equipment which are housed in and protected by cabinets. The purpose of a cabinet
is to provide a secure and suitable environment to promote reliable operation of the contained asset in
accordance with the asset’s Certifiable Life. Cabinets achieve this by protecting assets from exposure
to dust, moisture, heat, vandalism, UV, and other adverse environmental conditions with the potential
to damage assets.
This is to be used to assess the following elements:
• Cabinet Structure and Fittings
• Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shield.

• Refer to IS-078 Small Power & Control Cables for detailed condition assessment of cables.


165
5.38 OC-005 Passenger Information Systems

5.38.1 Scope
Passenger Information Systems (PIS) consists of visual and voice information systems located at
stations. This guidance is to be used to physically inspect the following equipment:
• Passenger Information Display (PID)
• Customer Help Points (CHP).
The components associated with PIS are detailed in Table 5.38-1 below. This table provides for each
component, the guidelines that are to be used for the condition assessment of the component, and
which asset that the outputs of the assessment should be reported against.

Component Defect, System Performance and Asset that analysis
Customer Information Software OC-001 OC-005
(CIS) (Train only)
TramTracker software - Tram only OC-001 OC-005
Servers and storage OC-003 OC-003
Local and gateway communications OC-027 OC-005
Customer Help Points (CHP) - OC-005 OC-005
Train only
PID - Screen OC-005 OC-005
PID – Housing OC-005 OC-005
Anchor Points OC-005 OC-005
Anchored Structure OC-005 OC-005
Local power and control cables IS-078 IS-078
Poles IS-042 IS-042

Follow the generic process outlined in Figure 1with the following additional considerations:
• If the asset has any of the following types of components, they are to be assessed against their
respective Asset Subclasses.
o Software
o Workstations, Servers & Storage
o Cabinets
o Local & Gateway communications
o Small power and control cables.
• Additional details surrounding the inspection of specific components are detailed below:
o PID Housings – Not all PIDs have housings, however for PIDs that do, damage to the
housing could result in the accelerated failure of critical internal equipment due to
corrosion and loss of ingress protection. The displays and their housings will usually be at
a height making close inspection from ground level unachievable. Assessing the condition
of the housings may still be possible, with the use of binoculars, by looking for indications
of failure on visible areas of the asset. However, closer inspection is recommended if
permitted. If the housing quality is poor across the asset base, then this reflects a likely
166
point of intervention.
o PID Anchor Points – The PID housing is most commonly suspended via anchorage
points to the support structure. This inspection looks at the anchorage points on the top
surface of the housing to assess their condition and potential for failure. Adequate
inspection of this component would require direct access to the anchor point of the PID
housing and consequently appropriate working at heights certification, access equipment
and PPE. Failure of this component would risk the safe anchorage of the unit to the
structure, potentially resulting in harm to anyone directly impacted by the failure moment.
o CHP – CHP include electrical, speaker and button circuitry. Damage to the externals of
the CHP could result in the accelerated failure of the CHP due to ingress of dust,
moisture, vermin etc.

Corrosion (Surface)* Table 6-9
*PID Housing Only: Using a measuring device, measure the proximity of corrosion to the nearest
seal(s) and edge(s).

167
5.39 OC-010 SCADA

5.39.1 Scope
Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) is a control system architecture comprising computers,
networked data communications and graphical user interfaces for high-level supervision of machines and
processes.
The components associated with SCADA are detailed in Table 5.39-1 below. This table provides for each
component, the guidelines that are to be used for the condition assessment of the component, and which
asset that the outputs of the assessment should be reported against.

Component Defect, System Asset that the analysis
Performance and outputs are to be reported
Supportability against
Assessment Guidance
Programmable Logic Computer (PLC) OC-010 OC-010
Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) OC-010 OC-010
Workstations, Servers and Storage OC-003 OC-010
Local and Gateway communications OC-027 OC-010
Software OC-001 OC-010

Follow the generic process outlined in Figure 1 with the following additional considerations:
If the asset has any of the following types of components, they are to be assessed against their
• Software
• Workstations, Servers & Storage
• Cabinets
• Local & Gateway communications
• Small power and control cables


168
5.40 OC-012 AVM System

5.40.1 Scope
The Automated Vehicle Monitoring (AVM) system and Radio Dispatch System (RDS) are used by tram
Franchisees in the tram operational control centre to communicate with drivers and monitor tram
location and status. The systems include components in data centres, in operational control centres,
along the tram lines and on-board trams.
The components associated with AVM are detailed in Table 5.40-1 below. This table provides for each
component, the guidelines that are to be used for the condition assessment of the component, and
which asset that the outputs of the assessment should be reported against.
Component Defect, System Asset that the analysis outputs
Performance and are to be reported against
Supportability
Assessment Guidance
On-tram radio unit OC-012 OC-012
On-tram radio data transceiver OC-012 OC-012
Drivers control head OC-012 OC-012
Base stations OC-012 OC-012
AVM Sign-Post Beacons OC-012 OC-012
Portable handheld radios OC-012 OC-012
Server OC-003 OC-003
Workstation OC-003 OC-003
Gateway communications OC-027 OC-012

• Software
• Cabinets
• Small power and control cables


169
5.41 OC-017 Telephony

5.41.1 Scope
Telephony assets include various voice communications systems including the Voice Logging System
and Advanced Communications (ACOM) systems.
This Asset Subclass consists of the components identified in Table 5.41-1. This table provides for
Table 5.41-1: Telephony Components
Component Defect, System Performance Asset that the analysis
and Supportability Assessment outputs are to be reported
Guidance against
Local and gateway OC-027 OC-017
communications

• Software
• Cabinets
• Small power and control cables.


170
5.42 OC-022 Video Surveillance

5.42.1 Scope
Video surveillance includes all cameras and supporting communication equipment, such as CCTV,
which is used to monitor the assets within the network.
This Asset Subclass consists of the components as defined in Table 5.42-1. This table provides for
Table 5.42-1: Video Surveillance Components
Component Defect, System Performance Asset that the analysis
and Supportability Assessment outputs are to be reported
Guidance against
Cameras OC-022 OC-022
Local and gateway OC-027 OC-022
communications

• Software
• Cabinets
• Small power and control cables.


171
5.43 OC-027 Local and Gateway Communications

5.43.1 Scope
Local gateway and communications equipment operated and maintained by train and tram network
Franchisees are always sub-system components of a ‘parent’ system. This section shall be used to
assess the condition of the local gateway and communications equipment within the ‘parent’ system to
support the condition analysis of the ‘parent’ system.
The components in scope for condition assessment are:
• Firewalls
• Load balancers
• Modems
• Routers
• Switches
• Wireless access points.



172
5.44 RS-002 Bogie

5.44.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Bogie components:
1. Bogie structure (e.g., bolsters)
2. Axle box
3. Antiroll bar
4. Traction links
5. Wheelsets
a. Axles.



173
5.45 RS-003 Main PSU

5.45.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Main Power Supply Unit (PSU)
components:
1. Current Collection
a. Pantograph Assembly
b. Earth return.
2. Power Supply
a. Surge Arrester
b. High Speed Circuit Breaker (HSCB)
c. Line Filter
d. High Voltage Box (HV Box)
e. Main Isolating Switch.



174
5.46 RS-004 Traction System

5.46.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Traction System components:
1. Traction
a. Traction Motor
b. Gearbox.
2. Drive Control
a. Camshaft
b. Chopper
c. Traction Inverter
d. Brake Resistor
e. Wheel Spin/Slide unit.



175
5.47 RS-005 Auxiliary PSU

5.47.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Auxiliary Power Supply Unit
components:
1. Auxiliary Power Conversion
a. Motor Alternator (MA)
b. MA Voltage and Frequency Regulator
c. Auxiliary Power Converter
d. Auxiliary Converter Inverter
e. Battery Charger
f. Auxiliary Power Storage
g. Batteries/Battery Box.



176
5.48 RS-006 Instruments, Controls & Monitoring

5.48.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Instruments, Control &
Monitoring components:
1. Measuring and Protective Devices
a. Speedometer
b. Tachogenerator.
2. Indicating, recording, display devices
a. Central control device
b. Display device
c. Fault storage device
d. Odometer
e. Smoke detector
f. Speed indicator
g. Speed recorder
h. Standstill monitor.
3. Safety equipment
a. Deadman’s handle
b. Driver’s safety device
c. Horn
d. Warning bell
e. CCTV system.



177
5.49 RS-007 Communication

5.49.1 Scope
This includes the following Rolling Stock Communication components (as per EN 15380-2):
1. Communication Equipment
a. Communication Clock
b. Emergency Intercom
c. Radio Installation
d. Shunting Radio
e. Special Radio
f. Digital Train Radio System
g. Position of Train System (POTS)
h. Global Positioning System
i. Passenger Emergency Intercom.
2. Visual Information Facilities
a. Destination Indicators
b. Line Indicators
c. Passenger Information System
d. Station Indicator
e. Technical Information System
f. Train Destination Indicator
g. Train Number Indicator.
3. Audible Information Facilities
a. Loudspeaker System
b. Telecommunications
c. Telephone Facility.

Although this Asset Subclass has no physical inspection requirements for the purposes of identifying
physical defects, some inspections are likely required to assess compliance with DSAPT.
The following additional steps are recommended for this Asset Subclass:
Table 5.49-1: Visual Information Facilities Inspection
Step Action Ref
1. From the boarding point, visually identify that a Destination Indicator Board
is visible or available.
2. Take a picture from all boarding points of any available Destination
Indicator Board.
3. Assess the regulatory compliance of the Destination Indicator Board DSAPT Part
according to the Regulatory Analysis section in the MDR. 17.4.
178
Table 5.49-2: Audible Information Facilities Inspection

Step Action Ref
1. Play a test tone through the Public Address (PA) system.
2. Using a Redback Q 2012 or similar, determine in which parts of the vehicle
a hearing loop is effective.
3. Using a tape measure, measure the approximate floor space that the
hearing loop is effective in.
4. Referring to the appropriate drawing of the rolling stock, determine the
percentage of floor space that the hearing loop is effective in.
5. Assess the regulatory compliance of the PA System according to the AS1428.2
Regulatory Analysis section in the MDR. Clause
21.1.


179
5.50 RS-008 Lighting

5.50.1 Scope
This section is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Lighting components:
1. Exterior Lighting Equipment
a. External Lights (Marker/Tail/Direction/Brake/Indicator)
b. Head Lights.
2. Interior Lighting Equipment
a. Saloon/Passenger Exit/Cab/Next Stop Indicator
b. Light Diffusers.



180
5.51 RS-009 Climate Control

5.51.1 Scope
This section is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Climate Control
equipment as two main modules (Driver cab unit & Saloon unit) which encompass the following
components:
1. HVAC body
a. Case body
b. Subcomponent mounting brackets
c. Access panels.
2. Refrigeration System
a. Compressors
b. Pipe work
c. Condenser and evaporator coils
d. Valves.
3. Air Handling
a. Fan assemblies including motors (condenser, evaporator)
b. Damper assemblies
c. Air filters.
4. Electrical
a. Circuit breakers
b. Contactors
c. Relays
d. Thermostats/klixons
e. PLC
f. Converters
g. Heater elements
h. Cabling
i. Connectors
j. Smoke detector (if incorporated in HVAC unit).



181
5.52 RS-010 Auxiliary Equipment

5.52.1 Scope
This section is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Auxiliary Equipment
components (as per EN 15380-2):
1. Sanding equipment (Trams & Siemens)
2. Lubrication equipment (C1, C2, D, E class Trams only)
3. Points operating equipment (Trams only)
4. Passenger counting devices (some E class Trams only).



182
5.53 RS-011 Doors

5.53.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Door components:
1. Sliding, Sliding Plug, Swinging Plug or Folding Door (powered, Bodyside or Intercar)
a. Drive Mechanism
b. Door Leaf and Guide
c. Door Control Unit
d. Bowden Cable
e. Emergency Egress Device.
2. Swinging Hinged Door (manual, Bulkhead or Intercar)
a. Door Leaf
b. Door Closer
c. Locking Device
d. Limit Switch.
3. Disabled Access Equipment
a. Portable Ramp
b. Gap Bridge
c. Sliding Step.



183
5.54 RS-012 Pneumatics (Other than braking)

5.54.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train) Pneumatics (other than braking)
components:
1. Air Supply Compressor
2. Main reservoir
3. Auxiliary Reservoir
4. Main reservoir Pipe
5. Flexible hoses (body to bogie and inter-car)
6. Auxiliary hard piping (horn/doors)
7. Couplings (gladhands)
8. Pantograph Compressor
9. Piping
10. Pipe fixtures
11. Sensors, indicators & signage.



184
5.55 RS-013 Braking

5.55.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Train or Tram) Braking components:
1. Body Mounted Brake Equipment (Train)
a. Electronic Brake Control Unit
b. Brake Control Module
c. Isolating Cocks
d. Pressure Gauges
e. Pressure Governors
f. Pressure Sensors
g. Solenoid Valves
h. Check Valves
i. Anti-Skid Valves
j. Sanding Unit.
2. Body Mounted Brake Equipment (Tram)
a. Electronic Brake Control & Wheel Slide Protection Unit
b. Hydraulic Power Unit
c. Hydraulic Auxiliary Release Unit
d. Track Brake Control Unit
e. Sanding Unit.
3. Bogie Mounted Brake Equipment
a. Brake Discs
b. Brake Caliper Units (Disc Brakes only)
c. Brake Cylinder/Tread Brake Unit (Tread Brakes only)
d. Auxiliary Release Device
e. Speed Sensors
f. Brake Hoses
g. Magnetic Track Brake (Tram only)
h. Emergency Trip (Train only).



185
5.56 RS-014-4 Intercar Connectors (Trams)

5.56.1 Scope
This is to be used to assess the following Rolling Stock (Tram) Intercar Connectors components:
1. Tow Bars (all Classes)
a. Support Structure
b. Tow Point.
2. Gangway (B/C/D/E Class)
a. Articulation Components
b. Bellows.



186
6 TPM Library
This section contains a library of Defect Specific TPM Processes that are applicable to one or more
Asset Subclasses.
The Asset Subclass specific guidelines in Section 5 will reference these specific TPM processes
where relevant.
6.1 Battery Current Float

Table 6-1: Battery Float Current Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify the indicator panel on the UPS Device.
2 Use the menu buttons on the UPS control panel to identify, note, and record the battery float
current.
6.2 Battery Resistance

Table 6-2: Battery Resistance Measurement Process
Step Action Ref
1 Measure and record the connection resistance (micro-ohmic reading) of IEEE Std
each battery in accordance with the diagrams below. Measure the 1188-2005
micro-ohmic resistance between the post-top terminals of each battery
using a meter specifically designed to measure resistance in micro-
ohms.
6.3 Boom Gate / Pedestrian Gate Operation (Timing)

Table 6-3: Boom Gate / Pedestrian Gate Operation (Timing) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Wait until the level crossing activates.
2 Begin stopwatch as boom gate begins to lower.
3 Stop timing when boom gate is fully lowered and record time.
6.4 Chipping
Table 6-4: Chipping Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess for chipping.
2 Using a measuring device, measure extent of chipping.
3 Ensure data points are assigned to either:
• Component type.
187
6.5 Collapse
Table 6-5: Collapse Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use the tape measure to measure the area of the component affected. Calculate the
percentage area affected.
• Component type.
6.6 Corrosion
6.6.1 Corrosion (Pitting / Section Loss)
Table 6-6: Corrosion (Pitting / Section Loss) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess areas for extent of section loss.
2 Identify section of member with significant pitting corrosion.
3 Using a measuring device to measure the corroded section dimensions at data point.
4 Measure the length of member affected by pitting corrosion.

• Component type.
6.6.2 Corrosion (Section Loss)

Table 6-7: Corrosion (Section Loss) Option 1 Measurement Process
Step Action
2 Select data point/s with the most significant loss of section.
3 Using either a measuring device (or estimate if not accessible), measure the section
loss.
4 From the data point measured, measure the length of the corroded area to either side.
• Component type.
Table 6-8: Corrosion (Section Loss) Option 2 Measurement Process

Step Action
1 Assess for section loss due to corrosion.
2 Using a measuring device, measure extent of section loss due to corrosion.
• Component type.
188
6.6.3 Corrosion (Surface)

Table 6-9: Corrosion (Surface) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess areas for surface corrosion.
2 Using a measuring device, measure extent of surface corrosion on member using a
measuring device or estimate visually if inaccessible.*
• Component type.
*For OC-005 (Passenger Information Systems) PID Housing Only: Using a measuring device,
measure the proximity of corrosion to the nearest seal(s) and edge(s).
6.7 Cracking
6.7.1 Cracking (General)
Table 6-10: Cracking (General) Option 1 Measurement Process
Step Action
1 For each defect identified, record the number, direction and average spacing of cracks
on the component.
2 Use the crack width gauge to measure the width of each nominated crack where safe to
do so.
3 Use a measuring device to obtain the overall length of each nominated crack where safe
to do so.
• Component type.
Table 6-11: Cracking (General) Option 2 Measurement Process

Step Action
on the component. If the number of cracks exceeds three, complete steps 2 to 5 for the
three cracks that best represent each defect. If the number of cracks is three or less,
complete steps for any cracks identified.
2 Use the crack width gauge to measure the width of each nominated crack.
3 Use the tape measure to obtain the overall length of each nominated crack.*
• Component type.
5 Photograph the crack pattern marking up the crack locations if not visible from the
photograph.
*For IS-035 (Buffer Stops): In addition, use the tape measure to obtain the distance from the stress
raised point such as bolt holes, welds, connections.
189
6.7.2 Cracking (Concrete)

Table 6-12: Cracking (Concrete) Measurement Process
Step Action
on the component. If the number of cracks exceeds three, complete the following steps
for the three cracks that are the best representation of each defect. If the number of
cracks is three or less, complete steps for any cracks identified.
3 Use a measuring device to obtain the overall length of each nominated crack.
• Component type.
6.7.3 Cracking (Brick/Masonry)

Table 6-13: Cracking (Brick/Masonry) Measurement Process
Step Action
on the component. If the number of cracks exceeds three, complete the following steps
for the three cracks that are the best representation of each defect identified. If the
number of cracks is three or less, complete steps for any cracks identified.
3 Use a measuring device to obtain the overall length of each nominated crack.
• Component type.
6.7.4 Cracking (Busbar Insulation)

Table 6-14: Cracking (Busbar Insulation) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess the busbar insulation for cracking.
2 Measure the number of discrete crack in the insulated busbar chassis.
• Component type.
6.7.5 Cracking (Welds)

Table 6-15: Cracking (Welds) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify and record location of crack. E.g. crack in tension zone of girder web
2 Use a crack width gauge to measure the width of the crack.
3 Use a tape measure to obtain the overall length of the crack.
• Component type.
5 Photograph the crack pattern marking up the crack locations if not visible.
190
6.8 Deflection
Table 6-16: Deflection (Option 1) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Set up the tripod and laser distance meter.
2 Record vertical height of structure (l1) and angle () by pointing laser at the bottom and
move to the top of the structure.
3 Point the laser distance meter at the top of the hold down bolts and point the laser to the
end of the cantilever post or nominated feature.
4 Record distance (l2) and angle () measured from the laser distance meter.
• Component type.
Table 6-17: Deflection (Option 2) Measurement Process

Step Action
1 Set up the tripod and total station theodolites.
2 Identify nearby survey reference points and establish benchmark.
4 Point the laser distance meter at the top of the hold down bolts and point the laser to the
end of the cantilever post or nominated feature.
5 Record distance (l2) and angle () measured from the laser distance meter.
• Component type.
6.9 Differential Settlement

Table 6-18: Differential Settlement (Option 1) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Place a laser level immediately adjacent to the structure and orientate the laser
horizontally.
2 Use a measuring device to measure the distance from the laser line to a common point
at the base of the structure on one side of the structure (e.g. bottom course of bricks,
top of footing etc.). Repeat the measurement at a corresponding point on the opposite
side of the component.
3 Calculate the alignment difference. Ensure data points are assigned to either:
• Component type.
191

Step Action
1 Place a digital spirit level immediately adjacent to the structure and orientate
horizontally.
2 Use digital spirit level to calculate angle.
• Component type.

Step Action
1 Assess for areas affected by ground movement or impact.
2 Use a tape measure, spirit level, or visual inspection to measure the difference
between points.
• Component type.
6.10 Electrical Arcing / Burning

Table 6-21: Electrical Arcing / Burning Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify components that appear to have been affected by arcing.
2 Take images of areas of deposition of pollutants on the components.
3 By visual observation estimate the percentage of area of the element / component
covered by pollutants (whichever is smaller).
• Component type.
6.11 Erosion / Scour

Table 6-22: Erosion / Scour Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a tape measure (or estimate if not accessible) to measure the area of the
component affected. Calculate the percentage area affected.
• Component type.
6.12 Flashover
Table 6-23: Flashover Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess for flashover – looking for black/white flash marks on the insulator.
2 Using a measuring device, measure the extent of flashover across the component
length.
• Component type.
192
6.13 Fraying
Table 6-24: Fraying Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Count the number of frayed strands that are visible.
2 Identify if the second layer of the conductor/rope is exposed.
• Component type.
6.14 Impact Damage

Table 6-25: Impact Damage Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify and record location of impact damage.
2 Use a tape measure to obtain the overall depth of the impact damage.
3 Use a tape measure to obtain the overall cross section depth of the component and
calculate the percentage of cross section affected by impact damage.
• Component type.
6.15 Mechanical Damage

Table 6-26: Mechanical Damage Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess for sheath/conductor mechanical degradation in the form of cracks, cuts, and
perforations.
2 Using a measuring device, measure extent of mechanical damage.
• Component type.
6.16 Missing Bricks / Mortar Loss

Table 6-27: Missing Bricks / Mortar Loss Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a measuring device to obtain the face area of a single brick.
2 Count the number of bricks/tiles missing or number of bricks affected by mortar loss
within the component. Calculate the percentage area of missing bricks within the
element or component (whichever is smaller).
• Component type.
193
6.17 Mould
Table 6-28: Mould Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a measuring device to measure the area of the component affected. Calculate the
percentage area affected within the element / component (whichever is smaller).
• Component type.
6.18 Oil Leakage

Table 6-29: Oil Leakage Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify the sealing faces of the transformer.
2 Examine the extent of the sealing faces and determine if oil leakage has occurred.
3 Determine if the leak is active of non-active and the severity of the leak.
6.19 Overheating
Table 6-30: Overheating Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Locate an area within the parameters of the thermal imaging camera where a clear
line-of-sight is available to the switch
2 Using the thermal imaging camera, pointing its laser to various locations on the switch
including the terminals, identify any locations exhibiting significantly higher
temperatures than the ambient
4 Take a minimum of two thermal images of the switch exhibiting higher than ambient
temperatures
• Component type.
6.20 Over-temperature
Table 6-31: Over-temperature (Uninsulated Conductors) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 For each defect identified, record the component type that has been identified as over
temperature.
2 Use a thermography camera to measure the temperature of the component and
calculate the temperature rise above that of the surrounding components.
3 Take thermal and visible light photographs of the component.
• Component type.
194
6.21 Pipe Rot

Table 6-32: Pipe Rot Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Perform hammer testing to determine the presence of internal deterioration. Strike the
member with the hammer, and if a hollow sound can be heard, move to next step.
2 STOP POINT – Review with Franchisee to determine whether pipe rot boring is
allowable for the asset, or whether existing data is available. If pipe rot boring is
allowable, proceed to step 3, otherwise proceed to step 6 using the information
provided from previous Franchisee inspection. If no data is available and the test is
not allowed, then record the presence of expected pipe rot and end the pipe rot
inspection.
3 Drill members at locations of maximum stress with a 10-12 mm drill bit using a
suitable sized drill so that the resistance to drilling can be felt. Boring must not go
completely through the member and should be slightly inclined to allow drainage.
4 Probe down the bore holes using the feeler gauge to feel the extent of defect.
5 Measure and record length of Solid, Soft and Rotten timber to the nearest 5 mm. Also
measure width of member to document original size. Calculate percentage of solid,
soft and rotten timber.
6 Holes are to be sprayed with a preservative treatment and plugged with a 60 – 80 mm
deep plug. Plugs should be flush with the surface.
7 Document location of data points measured.
6.22 Pollution
Table 6-33: Pollution Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify components that appear to have been affected by arcing.
2 Take images of areas of deposition of pollutants on the components.
3 By visual observation estimate the percentage of area of the components covered by
pollutants.
• Component type.
6.23 Potholes
Table 6-34: Potholes Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess for potholes.
2 Select data point/s with the deepest point.
3 Using a straight edge, lay the straight edge across the rut and measure and record the
depth of the pothole.
6.24 Resistance / Continuity Testing

6.24.1 Earthing System
This TPM covers all earthing systems on the train and tram networks, including but not limited to
traction substations, and earthing systems at stations, equipment cases and facilities.
195
Table 6-35: Resistance / Continuity Testing – Earthing System Resistance Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Record location earthing system.
2 Locate the main components of the earthing system such as:
• the earthing electrode(s),
• earthing system connections in the earth rod pits,
• the main earth bar,
• other equi-potential earth bonds such as security fencing, framework and other
metallic components.
3 For all low voltage installations (Multiple Earth Neutral (MEN) earths), perform a check
of the resistance of the earthing cable from any earth electrode to the main earth bar
using a low voltage ohm-meter.
If – >0.5 ohm record defective. If =<0.5 ohms the earthing system complies with
Australian Standards.
Do not undertake this test on high voltage systems and traction substations as it is
being undertaken by the Franchisee.
4 Testing which is not visual in nature must be undertaken by the Franchisee
representative(s).
Test the resistance of all substation security fencing to earth. Perform a check of the
resistance of the earthing cable from any earth electrode to the main earth bar using a
low voltage ohm-meter.
If – >0.5 ohm record defective. If =<0.5 ohms the earthing system complies with
Australian Standards.
• Component type.
6.24.2 Tram Pole Bonds

This TPM covers determining if the pole bond to rail is still fit for purpose. It is understood that pole
bonds are installed on all poles fitted with equipment, and every 10th pole in standard track. All
metallic equipment cases are also bonded to rail and should be checked.
Table 6-36: Resistance / Continuity Testing – Tram Pole Bonds Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Record location of the pole or equipment case.
2 Perform a check of the resistance of the bond cable from the pole to nearest tram rail
using a low voltage ohm-meter.
• Component type.
4 If 0.1 ohm record the bond meets Tram Franchisee requirements. If open circuit the
cable or bond to rail has failed.
196
6.25 Rising Damp

Table 6-37: Rising Damp Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a measuring device to measure the vertical length and horizontal width of rising
damp or powdering/spalling of brickwork.
• Component type.
6.26 Rotting Timber

Table 6-38: Rotting Timber Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a measuring device (or estimate if not accessible) to measure the area of the
component affected by rotting timber. Calculate the percentage area of the element /
component affected by rotting timber (whichever is smaller).
2 Use tape measure to measure/estimate percentage of element or component effected
by rot.
• Component type.
6.27 Rutting
Table 6-39: Rutting Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess areas for extent of rutting.
2 Select data point/s with the deepest point.
3 Using a tape measure (or estimate if not accessible), calculate the area/length of rut.
Calculate the percentage of rutting on component.
4 Using a straight edge, lay the straight edge across the rut and measure and record
the depth of the rutting.
• Component type.
6.28 Scouring
Table 6-40: Scouring Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Measure length and width at scour location using laser or tape measure, documenting
the area of the element / component affected by scour.
2 Estimate average depth of lost material and maximum depth to nearest 0.2 m. String
line and tape measure may be used subject to safe access.
197
6.29 Settlement
Table 6-41: Settlement (Option 1) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use the permanent marker to mark four quadrant points on the circumference of the
pole.
2 Use a tape measure to measure the height of the points with reference to the ground.
• Component type.
Table 6-42: Settlement (Option 2) Measurement Process

Step Action
1 Set up a tripod and total station theodolites.
3 For boxed pedestal footings, point laser to the top for corner and record Reduced
Levels and height.
4 For circular footings, mark out quadrant points on the top of the footing with crayon.
point laser to the quadrant points and record Reduced Levels and height.
• Component type.
6.30 Snipe
Table 6-43: Snipe Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use the tape measure (or estimate if not accessible) the depth of snipe.
• Component type.
6.31 Spalling
Table 6-44: Spalling (Option 1) Measurement Process
Step Action
3 Using a measuring device (or estimate if not accessible), calculate the area/length of
spalling. Calculate the percentage of the element / component affected by spalling.
• Component type.
198
Table 6-45: Spalling (Option 2) Measurement Process

Step Action
1 Assess areas for spalling.
3 Using a tape measure (or estimate if not accessible), measure length and width of
spalling.
4 Calculate area of spalling. Calculate the percentage of spalling on component.
5 Measure diameter of any exposed corroded reinforcement bars using a Vernier
calliper.
6 Ensure spalling areas and measurements are assigned to either:
• Component type.
6.32 Splitting
Table 6-46: Splitting Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Using a measuring device, measure length and width of split.
• Component type.
3 Photograph the split(s) and highlight the affected area if not visible from the
photograph.
6.33 Surface Rot

Table 6-47: Surface Rot Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess areas for surface rot.
2 Use the tape measure (or estimate if not accessible) to measure the length and
perimeter of the component affected by surface rot.
3 Calculate surface area of the element / component damaged by rot and record the
percentage of surface area affected.
4 Ensure affected surface area are assigned to either:
• Component type.
6.34 Termite Attack

Table 6-48: Termite Attack Measurement Process
Step Action
component affected by termite attack. Calculate the percentage area affected by
termite attack within the element / component (whichever is smaller).
• Component type.
199
6.35 Thermal Degradation

Table 6-49: Thermal Degradation Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess for sheath/conductor thermal degradation in the form of colour change,
bubbling, and elongation.
2 Use IR thermal imaging device to record the cable sheath temperature. This is
preferably at a time that the cable is expected to be operating at peak load.
Temperature and Insulation class are to be recorded by the inspector.
3 Using a measuring device, measure extent of thermal damage.
• Component type.
6.36 Tilting
Table 6-50: Tilting (Option 1) Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Place the laser level immediately adjacent to the structure and orientate the laser
vertically upwards.
2 Use a measuring device to measure the distance from the laser line to a building
corner at two points.
• Component type.

Step Action
1 Place the digital spirit level immediately adjacent to the structure and orientate
vertically on wall.
2 Use digital spirit level to calculate angle.
• Component type.

Step Action
1 Set up the tripod and total station theodolites.
• Component type.
200
6.37 Timber Loss

Table 6-53: Timber Loss Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a hammer to softly knock out any loose material.
2 Use a tape measure to measure the pole circumference.
3 Use a tape measure to measure the timber section loss.
• Component type.
5 Photograph the affected area and highlight the section if not visible from the
photograph.
6.38 Uplift/heave
Table 6-54: Uplift/Heave Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Place the straight edge on the surface horizontally.
2 Use a tape measure to measure the distance from the laser line to a common point at
the base of the surface on one side of the surface (e.g. the railway track). Repeat the
measurement at a corresponding point on the opposite side of the surface.
• Component type.
6.39 Vegetation Health

Table 6-55: Vegetation Health Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Use a tape measure to measure the area of the component affected. Calculate the
percentage area affected.
• Component type.
6.40 Water Damage

Table 6-56: Water Behind Structure Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Assess areas for blockage of weep holes.
2 Visually estimate the percentage section loss of capacity of weep holes relative to the
overall weep hole size.
• Component type.
201
Table 6-57: Water Damage Measurement Process

Step Action
component affected. Calculate the percentage area affected within the element or
component (whichever is smaller).
• Component type.
6.41 Wear
Table 6-58: Wear Measurement Process
Step Action
1 Identify areas of wear along the runner
2 Measure or estimate the minimum thickness of the runner.
• Component type.

ACA Asset Condition Operations Guide v1.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACA Asset Condition Operations Guide v1.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Asset Condition Assessment

Asset Condition Operations Guide

Version Date Comments

5.25 IS-072 Transformers .................................................................................................................... 147

6.10 Electrical Arcing / Burning ........................................................................................................... 191

1.3 Reasonable Adoption

1.4 Change Management

3.1 General Guidelines (Section 4)

3.2 Asset Subclass Specific Guidelines (Section 5)

3.3 Technical Performance Measures Library (Section 6)

4 General Guidelines for all Asset Subclasses

4.1 Work Health & Safety

4.3 Condition Assessment Process

1. Complete pre-assessment checks

2. Check Section 4 for Asset

3. Determine Asset Subclass data input and

4. Collate data and QA (Refer MDR)

5. Undertake analysis requirements for Asset

6. Verify and submit

Figure 1. General Condition Assessment Process

4.4 General TPM Definitions & Process Guidance

Include sufficient dimensions to ensure data point traceability.

4.5 Undertaking the ACA Analysis Requirements

4.5.1 Physical (Defect Assessment) Worked Examples

4.5.1.1 Example 1: Simple Asset - Poles (IS-042)

Identify Simple or Complex Asset as per IS-042 in the MDR.

Identify and record defects – noting Simple Asset.

Table 4-5: Worked Example – Pole Asset identification of defects

1001 IS-042 2001 Corrosion Pole / 4 3 Marginal 3 Visual 10%

Conduct Analysis and calculate ACR.

Table 4-6: Worked Example – Pole Asset Defect Analysis

1001 IS-042 2002 2 4 3 2 2

Table 4-7: Worked Example – Building Asset Attributes to be recorded

Table 4-11: Worked Example – Building Asset identification of defects

1002 1000 Wall 1 Rotting Cladding 3 2 18 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 2 10 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 2 12 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 2 17 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 4 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 1 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1000 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 3 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 4 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Roof 1 Rotting Eave / 2 1 5 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Roof 1 Rotting Cladding 3 2 19 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 2 14 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 2 16 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 2 Rotting Cladding 3 1 1 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 4 Rotting Cladding 3 1 3 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 4 Rotting Cladding 3 1 6 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 4 Rotting Cladding 3 1 4 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1001 Wall 4 Rotting Cladding 3 1 9 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1002 Wall 3 Rotting Cladding 3 1 8 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1002 Wall 3 Rotting Cladding 3 1 9 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1002 Wall 3 Rotting Cladding 3 1 5 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1002 Wall 3 Rotting Cladding 3 1 4 % 2 Visual 10%

1002 1002 Wall 3 Rotting Cladding 3 1 9 % 2 Visual 10%

Conduct Analysis and calculate ACR.

5. Calculate the Asset Element Condition Rating (AECR) as follows:

Table 4-12: Worked Example – Building Asset Defect Analysis

1002566 Wall 1 10002 2 3 3 2 2

AECR AECR AECR AECR AECR

Asset Condition Rating 1 2 3 4 5

Table 4-16: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Elements & Attributes

Table 4-17: Worked Example – Retaining Wall Asset identification of defects