Justin Carlo Tojon

Case Digest: Reodica vs. CA, G.R. No. 125066, July 8, 1998, 292 SCRA 87

Facts

Dr. Rosario Reodica, the petitioner, was a physician sued by Jaime Dy, the private respondent, for
medical malpractice. Dy alleged that Dr. Reodica's negligence during a medical procedure caused him
severe injuries. The trial court found Dr. Reodica liable and awarded damages to Dy. Dr. Reodica
appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's decision. Dr. Reodica then brought the
case to the Supreme Court, contesting the findings of negligence and the award of damages.

Issues

1. Whether Dr. Rosario Reodica was negligent in her medical treatment of Jaime Dy.

2. Whether the award of damages to Jaime Dy was proper.

Crimes

The case involves allegations of medical malpractice, which is a form of professional negligence.

Rule

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals, affirming Dr. Reodica's liability for
medical malpractice. The ruling emphasized the standard of care required of medical professionals and
the necessity of proving a breach of this standard resulting in injury to the patient. The Court also
affirmed the award of damages, finding that the evidence presented sufficiently demonstrated Dr.
Reodica's negligence and the consequent harm suffered by Dy.