Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Based Costing - Notes
Activity Based Costing - Notes
WHAT R IT?
A different method of allocating fixed overheads to inventory (takes into account batch related costs)
The problem with absorption costing (traditional costing system (TCS)) allocation is fixed costs that could be
product specific are allocated equally to all products
These two processes will not have the same fixed costs. Factory 2 will have additional costs relating to the
different products, for example set up costs required to prepare for the production of a different product
In absorption costing these costs will be allocated to the products evenly, however, this is incorrect. 4 set up
costs are incurred, if allocated evenly 80% of these costs will be allocated to red pens, however, only 25% of
the costs relate to red pens.
Here costs are allocated based on activities, activity in question here is setup of production for a different
colour. Total costs of setup are divided between the four set up activities. Therefore, each pen colour
receives 25% of the costs.
Notice that with ABC red pens will be the cheapest and black/green the most expensive. (25% of costs
spread over 800 pens vs 25% of costs spread over 50 pens)
ABC therefore provides more valuable inventory valuations for managers to make decisions. ABC highlights
areas where inefficiencies / excessive costs are being incurred. Management can then take actions to
address these.
Under absorption costing this information would not be available, management would make incorrect
decisions sending them into a “death spiral”
ACTIVITIES
These are actions taken within the production process, e.g. set up costs, cleaning costs.
In TCS these costs are assigned to each cost centre (eg manu 1 (labour intensive) manu 2 (machine
intensive)). Then allocated along with the cost centre fixed overheads based on labour hours or machine
hours
- This can relate to overheads being allocated to products which do not actually incur any of these
costs. Such as packaging costs getting allocated to a product that is transferred internally and does
not require packaging costs
In ABC more detailed activities are determined. The costs centres will most likely remain the same but only
the overheads incurred in those processes will be allocated. Additional activities will be created eg
packaging, cleaning, set up. Costs are allocated to these activities and then to the products based on the
amount of time spent in this activity
- Now no packaging costs will be allocated to a product unless that product actually spends time in
that activity
- Also, think pen example. The set up costs will be allocated to each colour separately, spreading it
evenly over the different colour options instead of over all pens produced
WHY ABC?
In historical times:
• Overheads minimal
• Modern times due to manufacturing processes direct costs are less and overheads are more,
therefore, a need arises to better track the usage of overheads
• Fewer products
• A company would focus on one / two products meaning allocation of o/hs was less
important. The more products the more important correct allocation is
• Low competition
• Think original ball point pen producer. No one else was there to compete, therefore, the
price charged was not important, as long as costs were covered. Modern days its highly
competitive, therefore, companies need to know the lowest price they can charge while still
achieving an acceptable margin
• Prior to technology it was very hard to keep track of detailed information in manufacturing
processes. Everything would have to be tracked manually. Now computerized systems
automatically track manufacturing information, it is therefore, much cheaper to have
detailed information on which to base allocations
• Service organisations are very overhead driven. Prior it was government run, they only cared
about providing the service and covering costs. As privatization occurred it became more
important to maximise profit and stay competitive, therefore, a need for accurate allocation
methods arose
COST v BENEFIT
Very important to consider if the benefit of tracking activities is greater than the cost. This
determines how much detail activities will be tracked in. The more activities the more accurate the
valuation
STAGE 1
Identify activities within the organisation
STAGE 2
Assigning costs to activity centres
STAGE 3
Select appropriate cost drivers
- Measurable
- Obtainable
- Identifiable with products
o Transaction driver (frequency of activity)
o Duration driver (time used for activity)
STAGE 4
Assigning activity costs to products
Activity hierarchy:
BENEFITS
• Great in service organisations – where most costs are fixed
• Better understanding of the various costs accumulated in completing the value chain
• Focused around the customer – cost accumulation in the value chain identifies non-value-added
activities
PITFALLS
• It is an absorption costing system, as it entails the allocation of fixed overheads