Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R_is_nen_Schr_der_Anna_Scharnschlager
R_is_nen_Schr_der_Anna_Scharnschlager
R_is_nen_Schr_der_Anna_Scharnschlager
fi
Räisänen-Schröder, Päivi
Fortress Press
2022-10-04
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/352517
publishedVersion
T
his chapter presents texts by two the established churches were tense, and
largely unknown female mem- Anabaptists were persecuted in the Holy
bers of sixteenth-century Ana- Roman Empire as both heretics and
baptist groups in German-speaking criminals. Especially after the turbulent
central Europe. Anabaptism is a generic 1520s, many groups were lay-driven, and
term coined by sixteenth-century oppo- at its best, the study of Anabaptism opens
nents of the movement to describe those extraordinary windows into the religiosity
groups in the Reformation who criticized of sixteenth-century laypeople and their
Luther’s and Zwingli’s reformations as aspirations for religious and social change.
half-hearted and sought a simple life in Anabaptists shared the Protestant fond-
accordance with what they understood as ness for the vernacular Bible. Depending on
the ideals of the early church. Anabaptism the group, greater emphasis was placed
was a highly heterogeneous phenomenon, on a literal or spiritualistic interpretation of
and despite some common basic princi- Scripture. Most Anabaptist groups, how-
ples, there were many doctrinal and prac-
valid arguments in favor of infant bap-
the mid-1970s, it has been common to tism, in contrast to Lutheran beliefs. With
divide the movement into three geograph- regard to the Lord’s Supper, they took a
ical strands with largely independent ori-
gins: the Swiss Anabaptists, the southern from Luther’s in rejecting the teaching of
German / Austrian Anabaptists, and Christ’s Real Presence in the sacrament.
the northern German / Dutch Anabap- Although oral communication was cen-
tists.1 Relations with secular powers and tral and at times vital among persecuted
groups such as the Anabaptists, the writ- the other hand, the persecutors had little
interest in preserving such texts beyond
a time where most people were illiterate, the immediate need of identifying, eval-
those who mastered the skill would read uating, and punishing the transgressors of
texts aloud and thus make the written norms. The Anabaptist groups themselves
word more widely available. The use mostly focused on preserving normative
of literature helped shape and main-
tain religious and group identity among
brothers and sisters who, at times, lived central religious practices. If texts by
far apart. When larger gatherings were women writers were preserved, we must
assume that they were considered espe-
and instruction in matters of faith could cially valuable for the community.
be replaced by reading devotional texts The bulk of information about
in small, trusted circles or even alone. In
addition, written treatises provided a basis was produced by their learned adversaries.
for discussion with possible proselytes or Main sources include theological and legal
religious antagonists. Among the literary texts, interrogation protocols, and other
administrational material. These adver-
the Anabaptists were lay prophesies, mar-
and their values distort the sources against
genres such as the Hutterites’ chronicles, the Anabaptists. Despite the challenges
with the sources, we should, in my view,
history or their extensive collections of try to make the common Anabaptists,
missionary epistles. As both a traditional women as well as men, visible as histori-
literary genre emulating apostolic episto- cal agents and to sound out as best we can
lary models and a form of commonplace what positions they took in faith and other
writing, letters played a central role for matters. If read carefully against the grain
the Anabaptists more broadly. Women and with an eye to the power imbalance,
participated in the letter-writing, which is the normative sources can yield glimpses
why the text samples in this volume draw into the lives and survival strategies of the
on this material and aim to showcase the Anabaptists or people suspected as such.
variety of Anabaptist women’s letters. As for the women, they were marginal-
While many of the leading men laid
out their theological views in writing, religious beliefs and, second, because of
their gender. Prevailing gender stereotypes
evidence of their lives and beliefs. Besides
living in a culture marked by oral com- were treated. As the “weaker vessel,” the
munication, it was often in the interest of authorities tended to regard women as
the Anabaptists not to leave incriminating easy prey for the conniving Anabaptist
written evidence about themselves. On preachers. At the same time, women were
for future research. At the same time, the Lutheran churches), bargaining with the
compilation only presents a small selec- authorities for leeway, engaging in reli-
tion of all the women active within early gious discussions, evangelizing, and as the
modern Anabaptism; archival records can sample texts exemplify, resettling in for-
provide clues to untold other destinies. eign places.8
A standard interpretation of the role Third, the two-phase model is
and participation of women in sixteenth- grounded in male perceptions and there-
century Anabaptism has been the so-called fore ignores the experiences and inter-
two-phase model. It describes the pro- pretations of the women themselves.9
cess by which women who were active in -
the early days of the movement were ership or gender equality is problematic
pushed aside as the organization of the because it too easily projects current ide-
movement became more established.6 als and concerns into early modern soci-
As attractive as this model seems, it does
not stand up to closer scrutiny, as Sigrun own. Even if Anabaptist women did not
Haude, for instance, has objected since usually hold formal leadership positions
early on. First, it is challenging to make within the movement, it does not mean
a clear distinction between “early” and that they were not actively involved and
“late” periods, because Anabaptism took
research should therefore strive to ana-
7
Second, the notion lyze in-depth the experiences and actions
of distinct periods may hamper our of the women themselves, whenever
interpretation of the sources. For exam-
ple, we might be inclined to downplay perspectives on the history of not only
the evidence of women’s activity in later Anabaptists but also Christian women
- more broadly. One recent opening in this
retical model. Moreover, the availability vein of research, extending the horizon
of relevant sources can vary considerably from sixteenth-century experiences into
depending on time and place, thus further the nineteenth century, is the collection
obscuring our view of the women. None- of essays tellingly entitled Sisters: Myth and
theless, Anabaptist women were active at -
all times, as, for instance, my own study .10 The essays
on Anabaptism in Württemberg in the seek to write history from the perspective
late sixteenth and early seventeenth cen- of the women themselves and to debunk
tury shows. I found women living out their long-standing myths.
beliefs by supporting their fellow believers, In addition to uncovering the stories of
hiding and feeding them, keeping the net- Anabaptist women, we should stop seeing
works alive, disseminating and reading men’s ideas and experiences as universal
literature, educating their children, yearn- and instead look into the constructions
ing to hear the word of God (just not in of Anabaptist masculinities. Examples of
best, letters can convey a lot about both they lived quietly for the rest of their lives.
the beliefs and the social and familial net- While Leupold acted as schoolmaster in
works of Anabaptist men and women. In Ilanz and elder to a widespread Anabap-
the “In Her Own Voice” section for this tist congregation, Anna took care of the
chapter, I will take a closer look at two 16
networks was based on a high degree of features of their own, especially with
trust, since such letters could bear signif- regard to their hierarchical community
icant danger if they landed in the wrong organization, community of goods, and
hands. Much was therefore communi- rich vernacular literature.20
cated orally, and hence we know only little Margarethe’s surviving letter is the
of it. Sometimes, however, the letters point only proof of her existence, since her
to the underground networks’ modes of name does not appear in the administra-
operation. Anna Scharnschlager’s letters tional records of Württemberg, nor do
to her niece Regina Anfang in 1546 (not any other letters to or from her survive.
translated here) ends with the note that This one, however, is preserved by both
Anna has provided the messenger—a her Hutterite community and the Würt-
trustworthy fellow Anabaptist—with a list temberg authorities who made a copy of
of names of those whom he should inquire it. It is one of the few epistles written by
about the assumed death and possible women that the Hutterites have deemed
inheritance of Anna’s uncle, information important enough to keep over the cen-
that Anna’s relatives had been unable or turies. And indeed, as Wes Harrison has
unwilling to convey.19 Similarly, Marga-
rethe Endris’s letter to her son indicates
that the letter should only be delivered in all Hutterite literature” of the breth-
by a trusted person and that some topics ren’s articles of faith and their main points
should be best discussed face to face, not of criticism toward the Lutherans.21
via letter. Further examples can be easily We can try to put Margarethe Endris
found in other letters by both male and into her historical context by examining the
female Anabaptists. situation of Anabaptists in both her native
About a generation after Anna Scharn- region and her later destination, Moravia,
schlager’s correspondence, Margarethe and by closely following the clues provided
Endris left her rural homelands and part in her letter. First of all, we can deduce that
of her family behind in Württemberg to she had left Württemberg and settled in
live among her fellow believers in Mora- Moravia before the writing of her letter
via. Especially Anabaptists from the Tirol, in 1574. Her emigration made her part
Switzerland, and Central Germany found of a growing trend in the early 1570s, at
their way into Moravia and established a a time when Württemberg was ridden by
number of close-knit religious communi-
ties known as Brüderhöfe. The Moravian harvests, and famine, while life in Mora-
Anabaptists are generally called Hutterites via was more secure in all respects. Mar-
after the Tirolean hatmaker Jakob Hutter garethe’s home village of Horrheim was
(d. 1536), and the movement traces its so struck by the hardships that the pastor
origins back to the South German / Aus- there was instructed to exhort the famish-
trian branch of Anabaptism in the 1520s. ing parishioners in his sermons not to emi-
However, the Hutterites also developed grate to Moravia in a too hasty manner.22
However, it seems clear that Margarethe their souls’ salvation. It comes as no sur-
had sound religious reasons to leave. notions of baptism and the Eucharist. In the
In her letter, Margarethe Endris hands of the Lutherans, Endris argues, bap-
expresses a vigorous missionary agenda. tism has become a meaningless act without
We have very little evidence about women a basis in Scripture or Apostolic practice.
acting as missionaries, although some The Lutherans have rendered the Lord’s
wives accompanied their husbands on Supper to shameful idolatry, endangering
missionary travels. Endris’s letter shows the salvation of the sinners who believe
falsely they will be saved by swallowing “a
had the required learning and zeal. Not piece of the sacrament,” whereas—in the
many letters by Hutterite women sur- Anabaptist interpretation—the Eucharist
vive, but those that do share Margarethe should be celebrated in remembrance of
Endris’s enthusiasm for her chosen path.
Hutterite women could thus use letters as She further places a strong emphasis
a means of proselytization, even if they on the conversion of a “new” Christian,
rarely embarked on missionary journeys necessitating a break with the old life.
themselves. The target audience was in Endris herself has taken that step and left
both cases largely the same—relatives, her old home behind to start a new exis-
friends, and neighbors in the native region. tence in Moravia. At the same time, the
Replying to an earlier inquiry of her fact that she is still corresponding with her
son as to why she rejects his Lutheran faith, son who clearly does not share her reli-
Endris outlines her views in sharp words, gious views indicates that not all family
creating a rigid division between the righ- ties were or indeed could be severed. On
teous and the unrighteous and their ways of the contrary, this letter can easily be read
life. She urges her son and daughters, still in
Württemberg, to separate themselves from also as the cry of a mother acutely wor-
the sinful world and join the Hutterites for ried about the eternal life of her children.
have been translated into English. Individual sources can be found in the Mennonite
Quarterly Review. Among newer English translations are also some concerning Ana-
baptist martyrologies.24
who is in your house. Dearest brother, I also ask you to write to me yourself how
you and your wife and other friends of ours have fared, so that I may know and be
of the sacrament.
Oh, it is a far cry.34 The Holy Scripture35 says whoever believes in Jesus Christ
wicked. They [false Christians] do not walk the narrow path of Christian virtues,
but the wide road of sins and vices. They only do as the Devil pleases. [The Devil] is
now the prince of the world, whom they serve day and night, the priest as well as the
fornication and frivolity36 and idolatry, arrogance, self-love, and pride,37 for they
do not know how best to please the arrogant Lucifer. Are these Christians or the
Christian Church, as they claim to be?
Oh no, it is a far cry. The Word of God, the holy Gospel, does not need Chris-
tians like that. True Christian faith bears no such fruit. It has a completely differ-
ent effect. You profess your faith in the holy Christian church, but your church
is an unholy association of those who disgrace the precious name of God and
curse relentlessly, which is the way of the Devil. You also confess in your faith the
communion of saints, but what a great community, where if one could put every-
thing in his own bag, he would gladly do it, so that the other would have noth-
ing. There are many more errors of your faith and false life, but it would take too
long to write more about them.
But this will remind you, my dear son, of the faith and Christianity in which
you stand. Therefore, my request and that of my children is that you would con-
vert, leave and separate yourself from such seductions and great delusion, and live
your life differently. For God wants a people who are separated [from the world].
And Christ says: Anyone who is not born again cannot see the kingdom of God,
that is, who does not live his life differently, in another way, in another sense and
for another purpose, cannot inherit the kingdom of God. Therefore, my dear son,
contemplate my account, ask God for mercy and understanding day and night, let
nothing hold you back, turn to God and join his people too. For we have no doubt
that this is the people of God, the right way, the narrow door, the true faith, by
which to become righteous and saved in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. Join
us too, you and your wife and my two daughters who are still outside. That is our
heartfelt request. Written in Moravia in April 1574 by me Margarethe, your faith-
ful mother, residing with my children Gretel and Jörg at Wastitz in Moravia.
The letter is to be handed over safely to my dear son Elias Endris, residing in
Horrheim, in the [Holy Roman] Empire.38
Reinholdt, Katharina. Ein Leib in Christo Werden: edited by C. Arnold Snyder and Linda
- Huebert Hecht, 71–81. Waterloo, Canada:
zeit. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1996.
Ruprecht, 2012. van Veen, Mirjam, Piet Visser, Gary K. Waite,
Roth, John D., and James M. Stayer, eds. A Els Kloek, Marion Kobelt-Groch, and
Anna Voolstra, eds. Sisters: Myth and Real-
. Leiden: Brill, 2007. -
Snyder, C. Arnold. Introduction to . Leiden: Brill,
2014.
Pioneers, edited by C. Arnold Snyder and Waite, Gary K., Mirjam van Veen, and Piet
Linda Huebert Hecht, 1–15. Waterloo, Visser. Introduction to Sisters: Myth and Real-
Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press,
1996. , edited by Mirjam
———. “The South German / Austrian Ana- van Veen, Piet Visser, Gary K. Waite, Els
baptist Context.” In Kloek, Marion Kobelt-Groch, and Anna
, Voolstra, 1–14. Leiden: Brill, 2014.