Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Test Bank Theoretical Basis for Nursing 3rd Edition McEwen file pdf free all chapter
Full download Test Bank Theoretical Basis for Nursing 3rd Edition McEwen file pdf free all chapter
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-community-based-
nursing-3rd-edition-melanie-mcewen/
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-community-public-
health-nursing-6th-edition-nies-mcewen/
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-pathophysiology-the-
biologic-basis-for-disease-8th-edition/
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-robbins-and-
cotran-pathologic-basis-of-disease-robbins-pathology-9th-edition/
Test Bank for Robbins and Cotran Pathological Basis of
Disease, 8th Edition: Vinay Kumar
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-robbins-and-
cotran-pathological-basis-of-disease-8th-edition-vinay-kumar/
https://testbankbell.com/product/financial-and-managerial-
accounting-the-basis-for-business-decisions-18th-edition-
williams-test-bank/
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-robbins-and-
cotran-pathological-basis-of-disease-9th-edition-vinay-kumar/
https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-maternity-and-
pediatric-nursing-3rd-edition/
https://testbankbell.com/product/child-health-nursing-3rd-
edition-bindler-test-bank/
Test Bank Theoretical Basis for Nursing 3rd Edition
McEwen
Full download link at: https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-theoretical-
basis-for-nursing-3rd-edition-mcewen/
Description:
Designed for one of the core courses taught in all graduate nursing programs, this
text is the most contemporary, concise, and readable nursing theory textbook on
the market. It presents historical perspectives on the development of nursing
theory, assessments of concept and theory development and theory evaluation,
middle-range theories, and shared theories from other disciplines in the
sociologic, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, focusing on the application of
theory. Learning features found throughout the text include case studies and end-
of-chapter summaries that help to reinforce essential concepts.
• ISBN-10 : 9781605473239
• ISBN-13 : 978-1605473239
Table contents:
UNIT I: Introduction to Theory 1
CHAPTER 1: Philosophy, Science, and Nursing 3
Melanie McEwen
Nursing as a Profession 4
Nursing as an Academic Discipline 4
Introduction to Science and Philosophy 6
Science and Philosophical Schools of Thought 8
Nursing Philosophy, Nursing Science, and Philosophy of Science in Nursing 11
Knowledge Development and Nursing Science 12
Research Methodology and Nursing Science 16
Summary 19
Chapter 2: Overview of Theory in Nursing 24
Melanie McEwen
Overview of Theory 26
The Importance of Theory in Nursing 26
Terminology of Theory 27
Historical Overview: Theory Development in Nursing 27
Classification of Theories in Nursing 35
Issues in Theory Development in Nursing 41
Summary 47
Chapter 3: Concept Development: Clarifying Meaning of Terms 50
Evelyn Wills and Melanie McEwen
The Concept of "Concept" 52
Concept Analysis/Concept Development 55
Strategies for Concept Analysis and Concept Development 58
Summary 69
Chapter 4: Theory Development: Structuring Conceptual Relationships in Nursing
73
Melanie McEwen
Overview of Theory Development 74
Categorizations of Theory 74
Components of a Theory 80
Theory Development 83
Summary 90
Chapter 5: Theory Analysis and Evaluation
Melanie McEwen
Definition and Purpose of Theory Evaluation
Historical Overview of Theory Analysis and Evaluation
Comparison of Methods
Synthesized Method of Theory Evaluation
Summary
UNIT II: Nursing Theories 115
CHAPTER 6: Overview of Grand Nursing Theories 117
Evelyn Wills
Categorization of Conceptual Frameworks and Grand Theories 119
Specific Categories of Models and Theories for This Unit 125
Analysis Criteria for Grand Nursing Theories 125
The Purpose of Critiquing Theories 129
Summary 129
Chapter 7: Grand Nursing Theories Based on Human Needs 132
Evelyn Wills
Florence Nightingale and Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not 133
Virginia Henderson: The Principles and Practice of Nursing 137
Faye G. Abdellah: Patient-Centered Approaches to Nursing 140
Dorothea E. Orem: The Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory 144
Dorothy Johnson: The Behavioral System Model 148
Betty Neuman: The Neuman Systems Model 152
Summary 157
Chapter 8: Grand Nursing Theories Based on Interactive Process 163
Evelyn Wills
Myra Estrin Levine: The Conservation Model164
Barbara M. Artinian: The Intersystem Model 169
Helen C. Erickson, Evelyn M. Tomlin, and Mary Ann P. Swain: Modeling and
Role-Modeling, a Paradigm and Theory for Nursing 174
Imogene King: King's Systems Framework and Theory of Goal Attainment 178
Roper, Logan, and Tierney: Model of Nursing Based on Activities of Living 182
Sister Callista Roy: The Roy Adaptation Model 187
Jean Watson: Caring Science as Sacred Science 192
Summary 197
Chapter 9: Grand Nursing Theories Based on Unitary Process 202
Evelyn Wills
Martha Rogers: The Science of Unitary and Irreducible Human Beings 203
Margaret Newman: Health as Expanding Consciousness 208
Rosemarie Parse: The Theory of Human Becoming 213
Summary 219
Chapter 10: Introduction to Middle Range Nursing Theories 225
Melanie McEwen
Purposes of Middle Range Theory 226
Characteristics of Middle Range Theory 227
Concepts and Relationships for Middle Range Theory 229
Categorizing Middle Range Theory 229
Development of Middle Range Theory 230
Analysis and Evaluation of Middle Range Theory 237
Summary 238
CHAPTER 11: Overview of Selected Middle Range Nursing Theories 242
Melanie McEwen
High Middle Range Theories 243
Middle Middle Range Theories 253
Low Middle Range Theories 262
Summary 267
UNIT III: Borrowed Theories Used by Nurses 273
CHAPTER 12: Theories From the Sociologic Sciences 275
Grace M. Bielkiewicz
Exchange Theories 276
Interactionist Frameworks 282
Conflict Theories 286
Chaos Theory 293
Summary 297
Chapter 13: Theories From the Behavioral Sciences 302
Martha Kuhns
Psychodynamic Theories 304
Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Theories 310
Humanistic Theories 313
Stress Theories 316
Social Psychology 319
Summary 324
Chapter 14: Theories From the Biomedical Sciences 330
Lorraine Frazier
Theories and Models of Disease Causation 331
Theories and Principles Related to Physiology and Physical Functioning 339
Summary 351
Chapter 15: Theories, Models, and Frameworks From Administration and
Management 355
Melinda Oberleitner
Overview of Concepts of Leadership and Management 356
Early Leadership Theories 357
Contemporary Leadership Theories 364
Organizational/Management Theories 365
Motivational Theories 367
Concepts of Power, Empowerment, and Change 369
Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Processes 372
Conflict Management 374
Quality Control and Quality Improvement 374
Evidence-Based Practice 378
Summary 379
Chapter 16: Learning Theories 383
Paula Broussard, Melanie McEwen, and Evelyn Wills
What Is Learning? 384
What Is Teaching? 385
Categorization of Learning Theories 385
Behavioral Learning Theories 386
Cognitive Learning Theories 389
Summary of Learning Theories 402
Learning Styles 402
Principles of Learning 404
Application of Learning Theories in Nursing 405
Summary 406
UNIT IV: Application of Theory in Nursing Practice 411
Chapter 17: Application of Theory in Nursing Practice 413
Melanie McEwen
Relationship Between Theory and Practice 415
Theory-Based Nursing Practice 416
The Theory-Practice Gap 417
Practice Theories in Nursing 419
Evidence-Based Practice 423
Application of Theory in Nursing Practice 428
Summary 432
Chapter 18: Application of Theory in Nursing Research 436
Melanie McEwen
Historical Overview of Research and Theory in Nursing 437
Relationship Between Research and Theory 438
Types of Theory and Corresponding Research 440
How Theory Is Used in Research 444
Nursing and Nonnursing Theories in Nursing Research 450
Other Issues in Nursing Theory and Nursing Research 452
Summary 454
Chapter 19: Application of Theory in Nursing Administration and Management
459
Melinda Oberleitner
Organizational Design 460
Shared Governance 464
Transformational Leadership in Nursing and in Health Care 465
Patient Care Delivery Models 467
Case Management 474
Disease/Chronic Illness Management 477
Quality Management 480
Summary 484
Chapter 20: Application of Theory in Nursing Education 489
Melanie McEwen and Evelyn Wills
Theoretical Issues in Nursing Curricula 491
Theoretical Issues in Nursing Instruction 499
Summary 505
Chapter 21: Future Issues in Nursing Theory 510
Melanie McEwen
Future Issues in Nursing Science 513
Future Issues in Nursing Theory 514
Theoretical Perspectives on Future Issues in Nursing Practice, Research,
Administration and Management, and Education 515
Summary 522
Index 525
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
signs of an advanced civilisation; but this theory has not, I think, won
much support. In justice to the author of this speculation it should be
said that his own work and that of his observatory have made a
magnificent contribution to our knowledge of Mars; but few would
follow him all the way on the more picturesque side of his
conclusions.[30] Finally we may stress one point. Mars has every
appearance of being a planet long past its prime; and it is in any
case improbable that two planets differing so much as Mars and the
Earth would be in the zenith of biological development
contemporaneously.
That will (rightly) suggest to you that is something very small; but
the most important information is contained in the concluding phrase
erg-seconds. The erg is the unit of energy and the second is the unit
of time; so that we learn that is of the nature of energy multiplied
by time.
Now in practical life it does not often occur to us to multiply
energy by time. We often divide energy by time. For example, the
motorist divides the output of energy of his engine by time and so
obtains the horse-power. Conversely an electric supply company
multiplies the horse-power or kilowatts by the number of hours of
consumption and sends in its bill accordingly. But to multiply by
hours again would seem a very odd sort of thing to do.
But it does not seem quite so strange when we look at it in the
absolute four-dimensional world. Quantities such as energy, which
we think of as existing at an instant, belong to three-dimensional
space, and they need to be multiplied by a duration to give them a
thickness before they can be put into the four-dimensional world.
Consider a portion of space, say Great Britain; we should describe
the amount of humanity in it as 40 million men. But consider a
portion of space-time, say Great Britain between 1915 and 1925; we
must describe the amount of humanity in it as 400 million man-years.
To describe the human content of the world from a space-time point
of view we have to take a unit which is limited not only in space but
in time. Similarly if some other kind of content of space is described
as so many ergs, the corresponding content of a region of space-
time will be described as so many erg-seconds.
We call this quantity in the four-dimensional world which is the
analogue or adaptation of energy in the three-dimensional world by
the technical name action. The name does not seem to have any
special appropriateness, but we have to accept it. Erg-seconds or
action belongs to Minkowski’s world which is common to all
observers, and so it is absolute. It is one of the very few absolute
quantities noticed in pre-relativity physics. Except for action and
entropy (which belongs to an entirely different class of physical
conceptions) all the quantities prominent in pre-relativity physics
refer to the three-dimensional sections which are different for
different observers.
Long before the theory of relativity showed us that action was
likely to have a special importance in the scheme of Nature on
account of its absoluteness, long before the particular piece of action
h began to turn up in experiments, the investigators of theoretical
dynamics were making great use of action. It was especially the
work of Sir William Hamilton which brought it to the fore; and since
then very extensive theoretical developments of dynamics have
been made on this basis. I need only refer to the standard treatise on
Analytical Dynamics by your own (Edinburgh) Professor[31], which
fairly reeks of it. It was not difficult to appreciate the fundamental
importance and significance of the main principle; but it must be
confessed that to the non-specialist the interest of the more
elaborate developments did not seem very obvious—except as an
ingenious way of making easy things difficult. In the end the instinct
which led to these researches has justified itself emphatically. To
follow any of the progress in the quantum theory of the atom since
about 1917, it is necessary to have plunged rather deeply into the
Hamiltonian theory of dynamics. It is remarkable that just as Einstein
found ready prepared by the mathematicians the Tensor Calculus
which he needed for developing his great theory of gravitation, so
the quantum physicists found ready for them an extensive action-
theory of dynamics without which they could not have made
headway.
But neither the absolute importance of action in the four-
dimensional world, nor its earlier prominence in Hamiltonian
dynamics, prepares us for the discovery that a particular lump of it
can have a special importance. And yet a lump of standard size
is continually turning up experimentally. It
is all very well to say that we must think of action as atomic and
regard this lump as the atom of action. We cannot do it. We have
been trying hard for the last ten years. Our present picture of the
world shows action in a form quite incompatible with this kind of
atomic structure, and the picture will have to be redrawn. There must
in fact be a radical change in the fundamental conceptions on which
our scheme of physics is founded; the problem is to discover the
particular change required. Since 1925 new ideas have been
brought into the subject which seem to make the deadlock less
complete, and give us an inkling of the nature of the revolution that
must come; but there has been no general solution of the difficulty.
The new ideas will be the subject of the next chapter. Here it seems
best to limit ourselves to the standpoint of 1925, except at the very
end of the chapter, where we prepare for the transition.
The Atom of Action. Remembering that action has two ingredients,
namely, energy and time, we must look about in Nature for a definite
quantity of energy with which there is associated some definite
period of time. That is the way in which without artificial section a
particular lump of action can be separated from the rest of the action
which fills the universe. For example, the energy of constitution of an
electron is a definite and known quantity; it is an aggregation of
energy which occurs naturally in all parts of the universe. But there is
no particular duration of time associated with it that we are aware of,
and so it does not suggest to us any particular lump of action. We
must turn to a form of energy which has a definite and discoverable
period of time associated with it, such as a train of light-waves; these
carry with them a unit of time, namely, the period of their vibration.
The yellow light from sodium consists of aethereal vibrations of
period 510 billions to the second. At first sight we seem to be faced
with the converse difficulty; we have now our definite period of time;
but how are we to cut up into natural units the energy coming from a
sodium flame? We should, of course, single out the light proceeding
from a single atom, but this will not break up into units unless the
atom emits light discontinuously.
It turns out that the atom does emit light discontinuously. It sends
out a long train of waves and then stops. It has to be restarted by
some kind of stimulation before it emits again. We do not perceive
this intermittence in an ordinary beam of light, because there are
myriads of atoms engaged in the production.
The amount of energy coming away from the sodium atom during
any one of these discontinuous emissions is found to be
. This energy is, as we have seen, marked by a
distinctive period . We have thus the two ingredients
necessary for a natural lump of action. Multiply them together, and
we obtain . That is the quantity .
The remarkable law of Nature is that we are continually getting
the same numerical results. We may take another source of light—
hydrogen, calcium, or any other atom. The energy will be a different
number of ergs; the period will be a different number of seconds; but
the product will be the same number of erg-seconds. The same
applies to X-rays, to gamma rays and to other forms of radiation. It
applies to light absorbed by an atom as well as to light emitted, the
absorption being discontinuous also. Evidently is a kind of atom—
something which coheres as one unit in the processes of radiation; it
is not an atom of matter but an atom or, as we usually call it, a
quantum of the more elusive entity action. Whereas there are 92
different kinds of material atoms there is only one quantum of action
—the same whatever the material it is associated with. I say the
same without reservation. You might perhaps think that there must
be some qualitative difference between the quantum of red light and
the quantum of blue light, although both contain the same number of
erg-seconds; but the apparent difference is only relative to a frame of
space and time and does not concern the absolute lump of action.
By approaching the light-source at high speed we change the red
light to blue light in accordance with Doppler’s principle; the energy
of the waves is also changed by being referred to a new frame of
reference. A sodium flame and a hydrogen flame are throwing out at
us the same lumps of action, only these lumps are rather differently
orientated with respect to the Now lines which we have drawn across
the four-dimensional world. If we change our motion so as to alter
the direction of the Now lines, we can see the lumps of sodium origin
under the same orientation in which we formerly saw the lumps of
hydrogen origin and recognise that they are actually the same.
We noticed in chapter IV that the shuffling of energy can become
complete, so that a definite state is reached known as
thermodynamical equilibrium; and we remarked that this is only
possible if indivisible units are being shuffled. If the cards can be torn
into smaller and smaller pieces without limit there is no end to the
process of shuffling. The indivisible units in the shuffling of energy
are the quanta. By radiation absorption and scattering energy is
shuffled among the different receptacles in matter and aether, but
only a whole quantum passes at each step. It was in fact this
definiteness of thermodynamical equilibrium which first put Prof. Max
Planck on the track of the quantum; and the magnitude of was first
calculated by analysis of the observed composition of the radiation in
the final state of randomness. Progress of the theory in its
adolescent stage was largely due to Einstein so far as concerns the
general principles and to Bohr as regards its connection with atomic
structure.
The paradoxical nature of the quantum is that although it is
indivisible it does not hang together. We examined first a case in
which a quantity of energy was obviously cohering together, viz. an
electron, but we did not find ; then we turned our attention to a case
in which the energy was obviously dissolving away through space,
viz. light-waves, and immediately appeared. The atom of action
seems to have no coherence in space; it has a unity which overleaps
space. How can such a unity be made to appear in our picture of a
world extended through space and time?