Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[FREE PDF sample] Environmental Change in the Himalayan Region Twelve Case Studies Anup Saikia ebooks
[FREE PDF sample] Environmental Change in the Himalayan Region Twelve Case Studies Anup Saikia ebooks
OR CLICK LINK
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-
change-in-the-himalayan-region-twelve-case-
studies-anup-saikia/
Read with Our Free App Audiobook Free Format PFD EBook, Ebooks dowload PDF
with Andible trial, Real book, online, KINDLE , Download[PDF] and Read and Read
Read book Format PDF Ebook, Dowload online, Read book Format PDF Ebook,
[PDF] and Real ONLINE Dowload [PDF] and Real ONLINE
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/integrated-modelling-of-
ecosystem-services-and-land-use-change-case-studies-of-
northwestern-region-of-china-youjia-liang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/carbon-management-for-promoting-
local-livelihood-in-the-hindu-kush-himalayan-hkh-region-zhanhuan-
shang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/historical-perspectives-to-
postglacial-uplift-case-studies-from-the-lower-satakunta-region-
jari-pohjola/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-climate-change-
communication-vol-3-case-studies-in-climate-change-
communication-1st-edition-walter-leal-filho/
The Family Nurse Practitioner: Clinical Case Studies
(Case Studies in Nursing) Leslie Neal-Boylan
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-family-nurse-practitioner-
clinical-case-studies-case-studies-in-nursing-leslie-neal-boylan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-many-faces-of-a-himalayan-
goddess-hadimba-her-devotees-and-religion-in-rapid-change-ehud-
halperin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/media-communication-and-the-
struggle-for-democratic-change-case-studies-on-contested-
transitions-katrin-voltmer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/geothermal-power-plants-fourth-
edition-principles-applications-case-studies-and-environmental-
impact-dipippo/
https://textbookfull.com/product/strategic-environmental-
assessment-and-urban-planning-methodological-reflections-and-
case-studies-giovanni-campeol/
Anup Saikia
Pankaj Thapa Editors
Environmental
Change in the
Himalayan Region
Twelve Case Studies
Environmental Change in the Himalayan Region
Anup Saikia Pankaj Thapa
•
Editors
Environmental Change
in the Himalayan Region
Twelve Case Studies
123
Editors
Anup Saikia Pankaj Thapa
Department of Geography Department of Geography & Planning
Gauhati University Sherubtse College, Royal University of
Guwahati, India Bhutan
Kanglung, Bhutan
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
v
vi Contents
1 Introduction
on water from glacier and snow melt particularly during the dry season. Several
empirical relations such as ablation gradient and snow melt estimation (Racoviteanu
et al. 2013), critical air temperature (Sharma et al. 2000), and degree day factor
(Immerzeel et al. 2010) have been formulated to estimate the snow and ice melt
contribution of the Himalayan glaciers.
In this study, a modified Positive Degree Day (PDD) model is used to estimate daily
discharge from the partly debris covered glacierized Langtang and Modi River basins
of Nepal. This model is based on the relation that the melting of snow or ice during any
particular period is proportional to the positive degree-day. The positive degree day
factor involves a simplification of complex processes that are more properly described
by the energy balance of the glacier surface and overlaying atmospheric boundary
layer (Braithwaite and Olesen 1989). This approach is appropriate in regions with
scarce data as it requires less input data and uses a simple equation to estimate melt
(Kayastha et al. 2000a; Hock 2003). Hence, in the present study, the PDD model, as
used by Kayastha et al. (2005) and Pradhananga et al. (2014) for the estimation of
monthly snow and ice melt from the glacierized basin has been modified to estimate
the daily snow and ice melt and daily discharge from these two basins and also project
future basin discharges with relative contribution of the runoff components.
2 Study Area
This study comprises of two glacerized river basins of Nepal. The Langtang River
basin is located in the Langtang valley of Rasuwa district of central Nepal. It is the
headwater area of the Trisuli River in the Narayani River system. The total area
of the Langtang River basin is 353.6 km2 with elevation ranging from 3,652 to
7,215 m a.s.l. based on the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection
Radiometer (ASTER) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) 2009. Out of the total area,
39% (137.5 km2 ) of the basin is covered by glaciers (debris covered and clean
ice) and the remaining 61% (216.1 km2 ) by rock and vegetation (Fig. 1) based
on ICIMOD Glacier Inventory (2010). Landsat Thematic Mapper 5 (TM5) images
from 23 January 2009 were used to delineate debris covered and clean glaciers
from the total glacier area. The mean annual temperature and precipitation recorded
at Langtang Meteorological Station (LaMS), Kyangjing, Rasuwa district located
within this basin at an elevation 3862 m a.s.l. for the period 1988–2013 were 3.4 °C
and 686.9 mm, respectively (Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, DHM;
Government of Nepal, GoN).
The Modi River basin is located in the Annapurna region and has a total area of
643.2 km2 with an elevation ranging from 757 to 8000 m a.s.l. based on ASTER
DEM (2011). 12% (77.5 km2 ) of the total area is covered by glaciers (debris covered
and clean ice) and the remaining 88% (565.6 km2 ) is rock and vegetation (Fig. 1),
based on Randolph Glacier Inventory 4.0 (2014). The annual mean temperature and
precipitation recorded at the Lumle Meteorological Station (LuMS), Lumle, Kaski
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 3
district at an elevation of 1740 m a.s.l. within this basin for the period 1991–2009
were 16.1 °C and 5613.9 mm, respectively (DHM, GoN).
Out of the total area, the Langtang River basin contains a relatively larger percent-
age of glacier cover than the Modi River basin (Fig. 2). In both basins, river discharge
is maximum in July and August (mid-monsoon) due to the monsoon precipitation
and the glacial melt during these months; whereas during the winter season, dis-
charge is characterized by a constant base flow with negligible inflows of rainwater
and meltwater.
The PDD model is a simple model which estimates snow and ice melt from the debris
free areas as well as ice melt under debris layers with a minimum field data require-
ment (Kayastha et al. 2005). In this study the modified PDD model simulates daily
discharge from the study basins and estimates the snow and ice melt contribution.
The entire study basin is divided into 36 elevation zones in both river basins with
a zone width of 100 m for Langtang River basin and 200 m for Modi River basin.
Temperature and precipitation at each elevation zone of the Langtang River basin
4 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
(a)
7150
Debris covered glacier
5650
5150
4650
4150
3650
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
Area (km2)
(b)
7900
Debris covered glacier
6900 Clean glacier
Rock and Vegetation
Elevation (m a.s.l.)
5900
4900
3900
2900
1900
900
0 10 20 30 40 50
Area (km2)
was obtained by using the temperature lapse rate of 0.59 °C/100 m (Pradhananga
et al. 2014) and precipitation gradients (as given in Eqs. 1 and 2) were applied to the
temperature and precipitation from the LaMS.
where, Pz and PBH are the precipitation at elevation z and base house (reference
zone).
Temperature at each elevation zone of the Modi River basin is distributed
using the temperature lapse rate of 0.67 °C/100 m applied to the temperature data
obtained from LuMS. This lapse rate is obtained from the temperature data of LuMS
at Lumle (1740 m a.s.l.) and Machhapuchhre Meteorological Station (MMS) near
Machhapuchhre Base Camp (3470 m a.s.l.). Similarly, precipitation gradients were
developed using the precipitation data of these stations in order to distribute precip-
itation at each elevation zone from the LuMS and MMS (Eqs. 3, 4 and 5).
where, Pz , PL and PM are the precipitation at elevation z, LuMS and MMS, respec-
tively. The relation between monthly air temperature and snowfall percentage
obtained on the Glacier AX010 (Kayastha et al. 2005) was used to separate snow and
rain from the total precipitation in both basins. In each zone, the daily snow and ice
melt from the glacierized and glacier free areas was calculated using the following
relations:
ks or b × T if T > 0
Msi (6)
0 if T ≤ 0
kd
Md × kb × T if T > 0
kb
0 if T ≤ 0 (7)
where, Msi is the snow or ice melt (mm/d), Md is the ice melt under a debris layer
(mm/d), T is the air temperature (°C) and k is the positive degree day factor for
snow (s) or ice (b) (mm/d/°C). The degree day factors used in the current study were
obtained from the summer values obtained on Glacier AX010 in east Nepal and the
Yala Glacier in the Langtang Valley, central Nepal (Kayastha et al. 2000a, 2003). The
ice melt under debris is estimated by using a kb and a relation between degree-day
factor and debris properties, i.e., the ratio of degree-day factor for a given debris
thickness (kd ) to the factor for ice ablation (kb ) and the ratio of thermal resistance of
debris (R) to thermal resistance for critical
debris thickness (Rc) (Fig. 6 in Kayastha
et al. 2000b). The calculated value kkdb of 0.54 is used in the present study. Since
the thickness of debris is thicker in the lower part of the glacier, kkdb value of 0.50
was used for the mean elevation zones up to 4350 m a.s.l. whereas 0.58 was used for
the elevation zones above this height giving a mean of 0.54 (Kayastha et al. 2005).
6 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
The snow and ice melt, precipitation contributing to runoff and the base from
each elevation zone is calculated as given in Eq. 8. The discharge from each zone is
summed up to derive the discharge from the entire basin (Q) as given in Eq. 9.
Qz Qr ∗ Cr + Qs ∗ Cs + Qb (8)
z
= 36
Q= Qz (9)
z=1
where, Q z is the discharge (m3 s−1 ) from zone Z and Qr and Qs are the discharges
(m3 s−1 ) from direct precipitation and snow and ice melt, respectively; C is runoff
coefficient with Cr referring to rain and Cs to snow and ice melt as stated in Martinec
(1975) and Qb is the base flow (m3 s−1 ), which is derived by applying the base flow
separation method II as described in Subramanya (2010). The monthly base flow
obtained from this method for both basins are presented in Table 1.
The discharge Q is then routed to the basin outlet as per the recession Eq. 10 given
by Martinec (1975).
Qn = Q * (1 − k) + Qn−1 ∗ k (10)
where, Qn is the river discharge (m3 s−1 ) at the basin outlet on nth day and k is
the recession coefficient, which is obtained by solving Eq. 11 given by Martinec
and Rango (1986). The constants x and y computed from this equation are 0.99
and 0.012, respectively for Langtang River and 0.9 and 0.015, respectively for Modi
River. However, in the case of Modi River, the recession coefficient is adjusted for
heavy precipitation (≥175 mm per day) by using x and y values as 0.97 and 0.08
respectively, in order to catch an abrupt rise and subsequent decline of a hydrograph
due to any concentrated input within a short time span.
kn+1 x Q−y
n (11)
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 7
The model accuracy assessment was achieved using the Nash–Sutcliffe model
efficiency coefficient (Nash and Sutcliffe 1970), R2 and volume difference. The list
of parameters used in the present study are shown in Table 1.
The observed temperature, precipitation and the stage height data required for model
calibration and validation in Langtang and Modi River basins were obtained from
the DHM, GoN. The significance test for the selected time series of desired variables
is derived using a non-parametric Mann–Kendall test (Mann 1945; Kendall 1975) at
0.05 significance level.
The observed annual temperature and precipitation data from 1988 to 2013 at the
Langtang Meteorological Station (LaMS) show increasing trends with 0.1 °C/year
in temperature and 8.8 mm/year in precipitation (Fig. 3a, b), which are statistically
significant using the Mann-Kendall Test.
The observed precipitation data from 1991 to 2006 at Machhapuchhre Mete-
orological Station (MMS) were not continuous and hence downscaled data using
Statistical Downscaling Method was used for model calibration and validation in
the Modi River basin (Adhikari and Devkota 2016). The analysis of observed annual
temperature and precipitation data of Lumle Meteorological Station (LuMS) at Modi
River basin from 1991 to 2009 shows an increasing trend with 0.1 °C/year for tem-
perature and a decreasing trend of −1.4 mm/year for precipitation (Fig. 4a, b), both
of which are statistically significant.
The study areas are dominated by monsoon precipitation with approximately 75%
(1988–2013) and 84% (1991–2009) of annual precipitation occurring during June to
September in the Langtang and Modi river basins, respectively.
The observed discharge (Qh ) was derived from measured stage height (h) by using
a rating curve developed for Langtang and Modi Rivers as shown in Eq. 12 and Eq. 13,
respectively. The Eq. 12 was obtained from Fig. 5 and the Eq. 13 was derived by the
DHM, GoN.
The climate data necessary for future discharge projection are derived from Cubic
Conformal Atmospheric Model-Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques
(CCAM-CNRM) experiment of CORDEX with resolution 50 km in two different
climate scenarios (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5). The Regional Climate Model (RCM) used
for downscaling is Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
(CSIRO)-CCAM and the driving GCM used is CNRM-CM5.
The RCP4.5 and 8.5 are the Representative Concentration Pathways of greenhouse
gas concentration trajectories after a possible range of radiative forcing values in the
8 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
(a)
9
y = 0.1x + 2.3
Temperature ( C)
0
1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
(b)
2000
Precipitaton (mm)
1500
y = 8.8x + 568.5
1000
500
0
1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
year 2100 relative to pre-industrial values +4.5 Wm−2 and +8.5 Wm−2 , respectively.
The RCM output was bias corrected by using the equations given by Sperna Weiland
et al. (2010) for temperature (Eq. 14) and precipitation (Eq. 15).
Tcorrected_MOD TMOD + T OBS − T MOD (14)
P OBS
Pcorrected_MOD PMOD (15)
P MOD
where, T is the daily temperature (°C), P is the daily precipitation (mm), T and P
are the N—year average monthly temperature and precipitation, respectively with
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 9
(a)
18
15
y = 0.1x + 15.4
Temperature (°C)
12
0
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
(b)
7000
y = -1.4x + 5628.1
6000
Precipitation (mm)
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
N representing the number of observed years, OBS and MOD are the observed and
modelled datasets, respectively.
The projected annual temperature (2020–2099) of LaMS at RCP4.5 scenario
used in this study shows a statistically significant increasing temperature trend of
0.02 °C/year and statistically insignificant precipitation trend of 0.8 mm/year (Fig. 6a,
b). Similarly, in RCP8.5 scenario, projected temperature and precipitation show sta-
tistically significant increasing trends of 0.05 °C/year and 2.1 mm/year, respectively
(Fig. 6a, b).
10 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
Fig. 5 Rating curve of Langtang River (29 May 2008–19 June 2014)
(a)
10 y = 0.02x + 3.3 y = 0.05x + 2.9
T RCP4.5 T RCP8.5
8
Temperature (°C)
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
(b)
2000 y = 0.8x + 678.4 y = 2.1x + 635.0
Precipitation (mm)
P RCP4.5 P RCP8.5
1500
1000
500
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
20
Temperature (°C)
16
12
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
6000
4500
3000
1500
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
Fig. 7 Projected annual a temperature and b precipitation of LuMS (2020–2099) and c precipitation
of MMS (2020–2099)
The projected annual temperature of LuMS for the period 2020–2099 in RCP4.5
and RCP8.5 scenarios also show statistically significant increasing trend 0.05 °C/year
and 0.06 °C/year, respectively (Fig. 7a). The precipitation trends at the same station
show a statistically insignificant increasing trend 2.1 mm/year in RCP4.5 scenario
and 4.3 mm/year in RCP8.5 scenario (Fig. 7b).
The modified PDD model is calibrated for the period of May 2011 to December
2012 and validated for the year 2013 for Langtang River basin, the results of which
are shown in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 respectively. Data from only this period is used
12 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
25
Observed Simulated
20
Discharge (m3 s-1)
15
10
0
Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12
Fig. 8 Comparison of observed and simulated discharges in calibration period (May 2011–De-
cember 2012) of Langtang River
25
Observed Simulated
20
Discharge (m3 s-1)
15
10
0
Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 Sep-13 Nov-13
Fig. 9 Comparison of observed and simulated discharges in validation period (2013) of Langtang
River
in the present study for model calibration and validation due to the availability of
continuous daily hydrological data of Langtang River of that period. Similarly, the
model is calibrated for 1991–2000 and validated for 2001–2006 in Modi River basin,
the results of which are shown in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11, respectively.
In order to capture the variation in stream flow, during calibration, the model is
run with changing seasonal degree day factors and the runoff coefficients for rain
and snowmelt lying within the range of these calibrated parameters obtained from
the previous studies (Table 1). The degree day factor for snow melt is higher than for
ice melt at higher altitude as described by Kayastha et al. (2000a).
During the calibration and validation periods, the rising and recession limbs are
fairly captured by the model in both basins, albeit with slight underestimation in the
annual discharge of Langtang River and slight overestimation in Modi River. The
annual mean discharges of Langtang River during calibration and validation periods
were 9.1 m3 s−1 and 8.5 m3 s−1 , respectively, whereas the corresponding values of
Modi River were 55.3 m3 s−1 and 46.3 m3 s−1 , respectively.
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 13
1000 Simulated
Observed
800
Discharge (m3 s-1)
600
400
200
0
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
1000 Simulated
Observed
800
Discharge (m3 s-1)
600
400
200
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
During the calibration and validation periods, the model has captured the peaks
and the seasonal hydrograph was also fairly reproduced. However, the monsoonal
peak was slightly overestimated in the Langtang River, whereas in the Modi River,
some sudden high monsoonal peaks were underestimated and some low flows were
overestimated. The discharge of the Modi River was dominated largely by rainfall
and this could be aggravated by sudden high intensity or extreme rainfall events.
This could be the reason for the model’s inability to capture sudden high peaks of
Modi River. A relatively high volume difference between the observed and simulated
discharge of Modi River was probably due to the over-estimation of the low flows.
The model performed fairly well to capture the seasonal hydrograph and the model
14 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
efficiency results of both basins show better results during the validation period
(Table 2).
The discharges of both basins were projected for the period 2020–2099 at the RCP4.5
and 8.5 scenarios. The glacier areas of both basins are decreased by 6.7% per decade
as per the result obtained by Bajracharya et al. (2014) based on 2000 and 2009 glacier
area datasets for Langtang.
The annual discharge projected for the Langtang River under RCP4.5 scenario
shows an overall increasing trend in river discharge of 0.002 m3 s−1 per year from
2020 to 2099, which is statistically insignificant and a maximum annual mean dis-
charge of 10.1 m3 s−1 in the year 2043 (Fig. 12). When we divide the whole projection
period into two, this trend exhibits increase in discharge from 2020 to 2050 and slight
decrease in discharge from 2050 to 2099. The study by Immerzeel et al. (2012) also
shows a gradual increase in the discharge of Langtang River by 2050. The increas-
RCP45 RCP85
Discharge (m3 s-1)
10
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
RCP45 RCP85
100 y = 0.1x + 65.9 y = 0.05x + 67.8
80
Discharge (m3 s-1)
60
40
20
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
ing trend of discharge seen in this study can be attributed to the increasing trend
of projected temperature and the resulting increase in the glacier melt. Under the
RCP8.5 scenario, the discharge trend increases by 0.03 m3 s−1 and the maximum
annual discharge of 11.1 m3 s−1 would be in the year 2080 (Fig. 12). This trend
is statistically significant. Most of the peak discharges occurred in July as the peak
glacier melt coincides with the monsoon peak.
The discharge projections of the Modi River shows statistically increasing trend
0.1 m3 s−1 in RCP4.5 and statistically insignificant trend 0.05 m3 s−1 in RCP8.5
scenarios. The maximum annual discharge under these scenarios is estimated to be
90.4 and 87.3 m3 s−1 in 2072 and 2029 under RCP4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively
(Fig. 13).
The modified PDD model used in the present study also estimated the contribution
of snow and glacier melt and the non-glacier area. The monthly distribution of river
flow with the partitioning of runoff components of both rivers show that the river
discharge as well as the contribution of snow and ice melt to total discharge was
higher during the monsoon months (June–September) as the melt season coincides
with the monsoon season (Figs. 14 and 16). The contribution of snow and ice melt
in the Langtang River basin was higher than in the Modi River basin as the glacier
area coverage was relatively higher in the former.
The average contribution of snow and ice melt to the total discharge of Langtang
River during the model calibration and validation period was 38.7% (Fig. 14) with a
maximum in the year 2013, which was 41.3%.
16 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
16
Discharge (m3 s-1)
12
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Fig. 14 Monthly partitioning of runoff components of Langtang River (May 2011–December 2013)
Over the period 2020–2099 in RCP4.5, a decrease in snow and ice melt (0.01 m3
s per year) and increase in rain and base flow (0.004 m3 s−1 per year) contribution
−1
to the annual discharge is observed (Fig. 15). The decreasing trend in snow and ice
melt contribution to the total discharge from 2020 to 2099 (Fig. 15a) can be attributed
to the decrease in snowfall as a result of warmer future climatic conditions and also
due to the gradual decrease in glacier area, which is also reported by Immerzeel et al.
(2012) and Pradhananga et al. (2014).
In RCP8.5 scenario, an increase in snow and ice melt (0.02 m3 s−1 ), and rainfall and
base flow (0.01 m3 s−1 ) contribution to the annual discharge is apparent (Fig. 15b).
The average contribution of snow and ice melt in the discharge of Langtang River in
both scenarios for the years 2020, 2050 and 2099 are shown in Table 3.
During calibration and validation period of the Modi River, the average contri-
bution of snow and ice melt to the total discharge was 2.6% and 1.8%, respectively
(Fig. 16). The discharge projection of Modi River in RCP4.5 scenario over the period
2020–2099 shows a slight decrease in snow and ice melt contribution (0.01 m3 s−1
per year) and increase in rainfall and base flow contribution (0.1 m3 s−1 per year,
Fig. 17a). Such a decrease in snow and ice contribution might be due to the result
of a warmer future climate. This marginal increase in snow and ice melt contribu-
tion may be attributed to the nominal increase in projected temperature under this
scenario. Likewise, RCP8.5 scenario shows decreasing trend of snow and ice melt
contribution in the total discharge by 0.001 m3 s−1 whereas rainfall and base flow
contribution exhibits increasing trend by 0.05 m3 s−1 (Fig. 17b).
The average contribution of snow and ice melt in the discharge of the Modi River
in both scenarios for the years 2020, 2050 and 2099 are shown in Table 3.
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 17
(a)
10
Snow and ice melt Rain and baseflow
Discharge (m3 s-1)
8
y = -0.002x + 3.9 y = 0.004x + 4.7
6
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
(b)
10
Snow and ice melt Rain and baseflow
Discharge (m3 s-1)
8
y = 0.02x + 3.5 y = 0.01x + 4.6
6
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
Fig. 15 Contribution of snow—ice melt and rain—base flow in Langtang River (2020–2099) under
a RCP4.5 and b RCP8.5 scenarios
Table 3 Partitioning of discharge of Langtang and Modi Rivers in the years 2020, 2050 and 2099
under RCP4.5 and 8.5 scenarios
Basin Scenario Year Snow and ice melt (%) Rain and base flow (%)
Langtang RCP4.5 2020 41.8 58.2
2050 43.2 56.8
2099 45.5 54.5
RCP8.5 2020 41.9 58.1
205 45.0 55.0
2099 50.0 50.0
Modi RCP4.5 2020 6.3 93.7
2050 5.5 94.5
2099 6.9 93.1
RCP8.5 2020 4.7 95.3
2050 5.5 94.5
2099 7.5 92.5
18 R. B. Kayastha and A. Shrestha
200
Snow and ice melt
Rain and baseflow
150
Discharge (m3 s-1)
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
60
40
20
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
60
40
20
0
2020 2026 2032 2038 2044 2050 2056 2062 2068 2074 2080 2086 2092 2098
Fig. 17 Contribution of snow—ice melt and rain—base flow in Modi River (2020–2099) under
a RCP4.5 and b RCP8.5 scenarios
Snow and Ice Melt Contribution in the Daily Discharge … 19
6 Conclusion
The modified PDD model is able to simulate daily discharge of the Langtang and
Modi River basins fairly well in the calibration and validation years despite limited
hydro-meteorological input data with good model efficiency and volume difference
values. The partitioning of runoff components in the daily discharge of both rivers
during calibration and validation periods shows that the snow and ice melt contribu-
tion in the Langtang River was relatively higher than in the case of the Modi River
which corresponds to the relatively much higher glacier cover area in the Langtang
River basin. The discharge projection result obtained from the model for the period
2020–2099 shows that the discharge of Langtang River will increase by 0.002 m3
s−1 per year along with a decrease in snow-ice melt contribution by 0.002 m3 s−1
per year in the RCP4.5 scenario. This can be attributed to the positive temperature
trend and the increased precipitation in the form of rain instead of snow and the
decrease in glacier area. The discharge is predicted to decrease by 0.03 m3 s−1 with
an increase in snow and ice melt by 0.02 m3 s−1 in RCP8.5 scenario. Similarly, for
the same projection period, the discharge projection result shows that the discharge
of Modi River would decrease by 0.01 m3 s−1 per year with decrease in snow and
ice melt by 0.01 m3 s−1 per year in RCP4.5 scenario. The discharge is expected to
increase by 0.05 m3 s−1 per year with a decreasing trend in snow and ice melt con-
tribution by 0.001 m3 s−1 per year. As the model provides information on different
components of runoff, it gives insights into the dynamics of hydrological system of
the glacierized basins with limited input data and provides valuable information to
fill gaps in understanding the impacts of climate change on the hydrological regime
and the water availability of the data scarce Himalayan region.
References
Adhikari TR, & Devkota LP (2016) Climate change and hydrological responses in Himalayan
basins, Nepal. In: Climate Change, Glacier Response, and Vegetation Dynamics in the Himalaya:
Contributions Toward Future Earth Initiatives. RB Singh, Udo Schickhoff, Suraj Mal (eds.), pp
65–86. Springer International, Switzerland.
Alford D, & Armstrong R (2010) The role of glaciers in stream flow from the Nepal Himalaya. The
Cryosphere Discuss., 4, 469–494.
Bajracharya SR, Maharjan SB, Shrestha F et al (2014) Glacier status in Nepal and decadal change
from 1980 to 2010 based on Landsat data. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Devel-
opment (ICIMOD), Kathmandu.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
XI
THE TOUCH OF DEATH
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.