Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Math Essential Features Rubrics Draft 10-05-2010
Math Essential Features Rubrics Draft 10-05-2010
3
- Demonstrates a general understanding of the task with minor omissions or misunderstandings.
2
- Demonstrates an insufficient understanding of the task with serious omissions or misunderstandings.
1
- Demonstrates no understanding of the requirements of the task.
Written Presentatio n
Accuracy of Calculations
Oral Presentatio n
- Work is explained relatively clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression, with few errors of expression. - Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately most of the time. - Has few mathematical errors. - Speaks clearly and articulately. - Uses a loud voice. - Makes eye contact with the group. - Addresses majority of questions in a meaningful way.
- Work is incoherent.
- Has serious - Has too many errors deficiencies in the use of or omissions to deliver mathematical useful results. techniques.
- Comment is unclear; may be vague, rambling, or insufficiently explained. - Volume is too low. - Words are mumbled. - Does not make eye contact with the group.
- Comment is so unclear as to make it incomprehensible. - Comment is irrelevant and/or inappropriate to the discussion. - Language is inappropriate and/ or
Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________ - Thoughtfully answers - Addresses some offensive. questions from the class. questions in a - Does not address meaningful way. questions in a meaningful way.
3
- Work is explained relatively clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression, with few errors of expression. - Chooses and uses the correct methods, formulae, and instruments most of the time.
2
- Work is not well organized and is difficult follow.
1
- Work is incoherent.
Math Modeling: choice and use of methods, formulae, instruments Accuracy of Calculations
- Chooses and uses the correct methods, formulae, and instruments sometimes.
- Does not choose and use the correct methods, formulae, and instruments.
- Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately. - Has no mathematical errors.
Rationale
- Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately most of the time. - Has few mathematical errors. - Provides complete, - Provides adequate coherent explanations or coherent explanations arguments about the or arguments about the choice of methods, choice of methods, formulae, instruments. formulae, instruments.
- Has serious - Has too many deficiencies in the use of errors or omissions mathematical to deliver useful techniques. results.
- Attempts to provide an explanation or uses some appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments.
- Doesnt provide or use appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments.
3
- Demonstrates a general understanding of the task with minor omissions or misunderstandings.
2
- Demonstrates an insufficient understanding of the task with serious omissions or misunderstandings.
1
- Demonstrates no understanding of the requirements of the task.
Rationale
- Provides an adequate coherent explanations or arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Moves conversation forward by summarizing, linking, questioning and/or clarifying - Listens to others and reflects upon their ideas
Leadership to - Effectively moves aid conversation forward by collaboration summarizing, linking, questioning and/or clarifying discipuli ideas. - Listens closely and reflects upon what others have said. - Brings out a key idea missed by the group.
- Attempts to provide an explanation or uses some appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Does not effectively move conversation forward. - Comments do not connect to the ideas previously discussed. - Does not actively listen and/or take notes.
- Doesnt provide or use appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Takes no responsibility for the seminar. - May not speak at all, or comment may reflect a lack of interest/ respect for the group. - Body language shows disinterest during seminar. - Comes to seminar unprepared and/or late.
Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________ Oral - Speaks clearly and - Speaks clearly and - Comment is unclear; - Comment is so Presentation articulately. articulately. may be vague, unclear as to make it - Uses appropriate - Uses a loud voice. rambling, or incomprehensible. mathematical language. - Makes eye contact insufficiently explained. - Comment is irrelevant - Uses an appropriately with the group. - Volume is too low. and/or inappropriate to loud voice. - Addresses majority of - Words are mumbled. the discussion. -Makes effective eye questions in a - Does not make eye - Language is contact with the group meaningful way. contact with the group. inappropriate and/ or - Thoughtfully answers - Addresses some offensive. questions from the class. questions in a - Does not address meaningful way. questions in a meaningful way.