Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Advocate Serial Killers
The Advocate Serial Killers
March 7, 2007
OPINION
Scooter Libby Loser in Leak Case
BY JENNIFER CHURCH
Daily Titan Sta Writer
Titan Editorial
Providing insight, analysis and perspective since 1960
opinion@dailytitan.com
Amidst news of Britney Spears downward spiral and Anna Nicole Smiths funeral is the obstruction of justice and perjury case of former vice presidential aide I. Lewis Scooter Libby. Why should anyone care that Libby was found guilty of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury and one count of making false statements to the FBI? Its so much easier to wrap our heads around celebrities messy lives and the ruins left behind by their poor decision-
making skills. I am jumping on the proverbial bandwagon in blaming the media for not galvanizing enough interest in this case. ese more-oftenthan-not spin doctors failed to make Libbys case sexy enough for us to dig into because really, it has all the makings of a sensational story: lies, the FBI and the CIA ultimately leading to the White House and its decision to go to war with Iraq. e case wasnt about nding out who the leak was, but the attempted cover-up. National security was compromised because people in the administration think that it is acceptable to wield power against those who oppose them. e Los Angeles Times re-
ported that Cheney was so focused on discrediting Iraq war critic Joseph C. Wilson IV, that he prepared handwritten talking points for his top aide to counter Wilson. Libby was not the rst or only government ocial to talk to reporters about Wilsons wife and former CIA operative, Valerie Plame. Some people may even say that he was made a scapegoat, but during the course of the trial, witnesses contradicted Libbys account that he did not know Plames identity. Perhaps the most shameful issue in the whole scandal is the role the media played. e press, who is supposed to be the publics advocate, proved that it
can be sloppy at times. When journalists were questioned about the leak on the witness stand, no one could provide straightforward answers because the notes they took werent specic enough for them to recall who said what. In the end, it seems as if the press let itself be used as a tool by people in power. Why else would it release information that was so shoddily provided when one of the hallmarks of good journalism is plain and simple attribution? Libby is facing up to 25 years in prison and can be ned up to $250,000 on each guilty count. In the meantime, the number of U.S. casualties in the Iraq war has reached over 3,100.
EDITORS NOTE: e Titan Editorial is solely the opinion of the Daily Titan editorial board and was written after the open debate between board members. e editorial board consists of the executive editor, the managing editor, the opinion editor, the news editors, the copy chief and other editors upon appointment of the executive editor.
Since recent studies show that most of us would rather watch e Simpsons than memorize the Bill of Rights, let me remind you that the First Amendment is the one that guarantees Americans the freedom of speech. is was a right bestowed upon us by our forefathers to (arguably) give us the right to discuss the government without getting thrown in jail for unfavorable opinions. Forget jail time, these days people are serving a dierent kind of sentence for expressing political opinions. When the Dixie Chicks lead singer, Natalie Maines, made her now infamous remark about President Bush, what followed could only be called a media frenzy that resulted in many radio stations blacklisting the group. And now in the days after conservative commentator Ann Coulter used the word faggot while addressing the
crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference, she too faces a backlash that involves sponsors pulling ads o of her Web site. To those of you who were watching e Simpsons instead of the evening news when the story broke, Coulters exact statement was, I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word faggot, so Im so, kind of at an impasse, cant really talk about Edwards. Coulters remark is being reported as a homophobic slur. Ultimately, its a slur because you cant use the F word these days, as Coulter pointed out at least not without the media jumping all over you for it. Coulters opinion, and yes it was merely her opinion, wouldnt have caught media attention if she hadnt used that word. Had she, instead, bolstered opinion by calling Edwards a weenie, or better yet, a butthead, she might not be the focus of such intense scrutiny right now. Forget the usage of the F word for just a minute and remember that ultimately Coulter was exercising her right to freedom of speech. I am not
condoning her usage of the word; however, I do applaud her for speaking her mind, as I applauded the Dixie Chicks for doing the same. She didnt outright call Edwards the F word. She made a political comment with social implications by declaring that you have to go into rehab if you use that word. I admire her for being brave enough to use a word she had to have known would raise ire in the media. And because I refuse to believe that she doesnt know any better than to use such vile and bigoted language than she did, I can only accept that she knew exactly what she was saying and used to the word to get media attention. So she crossed the line by using the word. OK. But when people choose to use words like faggot in the media, as did Isaiah Washington from Greys Anatomy and now Coulter at the conference, all that is happening is that everyday people like you and me are learning that it is not okay to say things like that. A debate is sparked, opinions are formed and all the while, minds are expanding. And the only lasting eect Coulters slur will have is that of change.
A Center of Shame
BY TOM MADDEN
Daily Titan Sta Writer
opinion@dailytitan.com
The Advocate
BY Robert
Moran
e number 18 is quickly becoming the worst number in America. For our troops it signies the age at which many enlisted to ght the disastrous war over in Iraq, and now its the building number that houses the mold, rodent feces and cockroaches that plagues the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. While the Bush administration claims that the Iraq war is being fought overseas to keep terrorists away from our homeland, its apparent that the wounds America deals with everyday are self-inicted. On Monday, two soldiers that were wounded in Iraq shared stories of the neglect and mistreatment they received at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center before members of Congress. e Walter Reed Medical Center, located only several miles from the White House, is the nucleus of the militarys medical system. Although its Web sites motto is We Provide Warrior Care, the center is under re for housing wounded soldiers in rooms deteriorating from rodent droppings and mold, while giving inadequate and confusing information about outpatient services to patients looking for treatment. According to nytimes.com, Sgt. John Daniel Shannon, who suffered a head wound from an AK-47 round, was released only a week after receiving rushed treatment at Walter Reed. While disoriented from brain injuries and the loss of an eye, Reed was given a map and told to nd his own way. Accounts like Reeds exhibit the irresponsibility of the Bush administration. e presidents plan of sending 21,500 more troops to the bloody streets of Baghdad might mean catastrophe both in Iraq and at the medical centers across the nation, which cant provide proper care for our wounded troops. With 11 soldiers already dead in the early days of March, according to icasualities.org, coupled with the despicable government-provided treatment that our troops receive, it is denitely time for a regime change. Why does it take four years and a Washington Post story to uncover the injustices taking place only miles from President Bushs bedroom? Why is it that every time a highranking ocial gets questioned over their incompetence, they pass the blame onto others? When will the American people hold their public ocials accountable? According to nytimes.com when former Walter Reed director Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley was asked to explain the soiled and vile conditions at the center he told Congress that inspections were not part of his normal job duties. As head of any medical center, let alone one that houses the brave soldiers whose lives will forever be changed by disgurements, disabilities and mental anguish, wouldnt making sure the foundation that houses them is at least a cut above an abandoned warehouse be one of your duties? While the blame gets predictably passed on down the line, lets hope it will reach the minds of the Americans that voted for these incompetent rats, and that they will have enough civility to make sure our wounded troops and their distressed families will be given the treatment they rightfully deserve.