Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lack of Affordable Housing Causes Homelessness
Lack of Affordable Housing Causes Homelessness
Before these questions can be properly answered, it is important to cut through the thick web of misinformation and stereotypes that have been attached to homelessness over the years. The media, and the politicians who regularly utilize it to ramrod their reactionary agenda, have painted a negative portrait of the homeless.
Some 20 to 40 percent of homeless people are employed. 37 percent are families with children. This is the fastest-growing population among the homeless. 25 percent are under the age of 18. 30 percent are over the age of 45. 25-30 percent are mentally disabled. 30-40 percent are drug or alcohol dependent.
These statistics clearly disprove the long-standing, mass media-fueled myth that homeless people are typically drunks, druggies or crazy. Even though 30-40 percent of the homeless are alcoholics or drug addicts, only 30-40 percent are, and although 25-30 percent are mentally disturbed, only 25-30 percent are. Moreover, millions of Americans who are alcoholics or mentally ill persons never become homeless. So, granted that while addiction or mental illness makes the threat of homelessness more serious, these problems only contributethey do not cause homelessness.
There is a catch-22 in the life of the homeless person: it is nearly impossible to get a job without first having a permanent address and phone number, and getting a permanent address requires steady incomeusually from a job! Shortages of both money on the part of the renter, and affordable dwellings to rent, perpetuate their problems. Affordable housing in our country is dwindling. Between 1973 and 1993, 2.2 million low-rent apartment units have vanished from the market, while the demand for such units increased by 4.7 million renters. Between 1993 and 1995, the supply of low cost units decreased by another 900,000. In addition to the loss of inexpensive apartment units, there has been a sharp decline in singleroom occupancy (SRO) housing. Traditionally, SRO's have been used by homeless people particularly those with mental health or addiction issuesto get off the streets, however temporarily. But between 1970 and the mid-1980's one million SRO's were demolished. This trend has been most notable in large cities: Chicago lost all of its cubicle hotels (rooms which could be rented for $8-$10 per night); New York City lost 87 percent of its $200 per month SRO stock; Los Angeles lost more than half of its SRO housing. Housing assistance programs, while a step in the right direction, have been inadequate. Only 26 percent of households eligible for housing assistance ever receive it. In 1997, the U.S. Conference of Mayors conducted a study of the status of hunger and homelessness. They found that public housing applicants wait an average of 19 months to receive assistance, and applicants for Section 8 housing vouchers wait an average of 37 months. In 19 of the cities surveyed, the waiting list for housing programs was so long that the cities actually stopped accepting applications!
Skyrocketing Rents
Skyrocketing rents are pushing working people to the brink of homelessness. In 1995, the city of Boston ended its rent-control law. Apartment units that once cost $500 per month now cost $900. A three-bedroom apartment in working-class South Boston currently rents for about $1,800 per month. The conservative Boston landlords who advocated for the end of rent control claimed that it would be "good for everyone." They argued that ending rent control would lead to higher property-tax revenues and create incentives for developers to build new, more profitable housing units, eventually causing rent prices to fall again. However, it is clear that, as the years go by after the end of rent control, housing costs have not fallen but have even doubled. Real-estate developers are building mainly expensive units and are also buying up older, affordable houses and refurbishing them into yuppie condominiums. So clearly, relying on the invisible hand of the housing market does not benefit poor people who need housing. The result of the terrible shortage of affordable housing has been a sharp increase in homelessness and poverty. Despite the Department of Housing and Urban Development's "Fair
Market Rent" standardthat a family should not pay more than 30 percent of its income on housingmost poor families have no choice. An average minimum-wage worker would have to work 83 hours a week in order to afford a two-bedroom apartment at 30 percent of her or his income. The federal government has in the past taken notable stabs at the problem of homelessness. In 1987, the McKinney Act was passed, creating all kinds of new programs to house, feed, educate and help homeless people find jobs. However, over the years pieces of the McKinney Act have remained underfunded or seriously underfunded.
Source Citation:
Burleson, Bruce. "Lack of Affordable Housing Causes Homelessness." Opposing Viewpoints: The Homeless. Ed. Jennifer A. Hurley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Maggie L Walker Governors School. 11 Jan. 2010 <http://find.galegroup.com/ovrc/infomark.do?&contentSet=GSRC&type=retrieve&tabID=T010 &prodId=OVRC&docId=EJ3010235213&source=gale&srcprod=OVRC&userGroupName=rich 82127&version=1.0>.