Rain-cell Identification and Modeling for Propagation Studies from weather radar images of the northwest s:ain. Study includes the modeling of these images according to two well-known rain-cell models, EXCELL and r this analysis, a procedure for detecting rain fields and an algorithm for identifying rain cells within the images is.
Rain-cell Identification and Modeling for Propagation Studies from weather radar images of the northwest s:ain. Study includes the modeling of these images according to two well-known rain-cell models, EXCELL and r this analysis, a procedure for detecting rain fields and an algorithm for identifying rain cells within the images is.
Rain-cell Identification and Modeling for Propagation Studies from weather radar images of the northwest s:ain. Study includes the modeling of these images according to two well-known rain-cell models, EXCELL and r this analysis, a procedure for detecting rain fields and an algorithm for identifying rain cells within the images is.
Weather Radar Images V. Pastoriza 1 , A. Nuiiez 2 , P. Mariiio 1 , F. P. Fontim 2 , and U.-C. Fiebig 3 1University of Vigo, Electronic Technology Department Campus As Lagoas, 36310, Vigo, Spain Tel: +34986818717; E-mail: vpastoriza@uvigo.es; pmarino@uvigo.es 2University of Vigo, Signal Theory and Communications Department Campus As Lagoas, 36310, Vigo ,Spain E-mail: fito@uvigo.es;fpfontan@tsc.uvigo.es 3German Aerospace Center (OLR), Institute of Communications and Navigation 0-82230, Wessling, Germany E-mail: uwe.fiebig@dlr.de Abstract _. a'ms to characterize and model the rain fields for propagation studies from weather radar images of the northwest S::ain. The study includes the modeling of these images according to two well-known rain-cell models, EXCELL and ~ r this analysis, a procedure for detecting rain fields and an algorithm for identifying rain cells within the images is This work is part of an ongoing activity, trying to develop dynamic space-time models of rain fields for simulating ........~ - < : . ~ . J effects on millimeter-wave communication systems. =Iectromagnetic propagation; radar data processing; rain cell modeling; rain; millimeter wave radio propagation _ ......,-;,1 \" "'1 factors 1. Introduction -nowledge of the structure of rain cells is important in - ":eling of rain-induced propagation effects, for radio _.::ion applications at frequencies above about 10 GHz -5jJRce and terrestrial applications [1-7). Rain-induced - ;::an be measured using satellite beacons, or, to a point, " .,eters. This kind of experimental work can be per :. at a few geographical locations, and for a limited . -- :'requencies and link geometries. Unfortunately, the :.:!l ed can not easily be extrapolated to other locations. _ . e this problem, several attenuation models based on 5".::al data have been developed, which provide adequate that allows the estimation of link margins for locations _ "': the world [8] . Moreover, new satellite networks will - ':nic-reconfiguration techniques, which must be ade .:-.::gned. This requires the use of space-time models for = :.'":e mentioned design. _ .::escription of the horizontal structure of rain fields is : ex, due to its high space-time variability. This explains -;::al-statistical nature of most studies perfoTI11ed on this :everal research groups have developed i"ain-cell models _ -- a -radar data. These are of a statistical nature, but do ;-'e construction of two-dimensional rain fields [10-14]. " as and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, October 2010 Their application in the study and characterization of atmospheric propagation enables evaluating the following at any location: diversity gain, terrestrial-path attenuation, or slant-path attenuation for different azimuth and elevation angle directions. Moreover, the short-term forecasting of rain rate to derive estimates of rain-field attenuation, if integrated into a fade-mitigation and resource-man agement scheme, could lead to an increase in system uptime. Simple rain-cell characterization can be done using only a limited number of parameters. Simplicity is an inherent advantage over sophisticated techniques, and reduces the computation time and the storage space necessary for extracting model parameters from the radar observations [9]. In most studies, the mathematical representation of rain cells follows a stochastic approach, describ ing rain cells as randomly generated entities that behave similarly in a statistical sense - to the observed rain cells. The work reported here divides the observed rain fields into sets of rain cells that are described via simple mathematical formulations. Two fairly simple models found in the literature allow a representation of their essential hydrological characteristics: geo graphical extent and small-scale variability. These two models characterize rain cells by means of an ellipse. The EXCELL model assumes that intensity within the cell decays exponentially from a maximum at its center [15] . The HYCELL model describes the intensity decay as following a combination of an exponential func- ISSN 1045-9243/20101$25 2010 IEEE 117 tion and a Gaussian function (quadratic exponential) [9]. Two par ticular cases have been identified for the HYCELL model: a purely exponential case and a purely Gaussian case, for which the cells can be characterized by means of three parameters each, instead of the required seven parameters for the general HYCELL model. This paper is organized as follows. First, an introduction on rain-cell modeling is presented. The experimental database of weather-radar images (WRIs) used is then described. How rain cells are identified within weather-radar images for model param eterization is next discussed. Finally, the results of this study are presented. 2. Rain-Cell Modeling The term "rain cell" is frequently found in the meteorology and hydrology literature. However, there is not a widely accepted definition for this concept [16]. The terms "rain cel!" and "rain area" are generally found in studies on the structure of rain fields based on weather-radar data. The term "rain cell" is often the pre ferred term when there is an implicit or explicit reference to the dynamic structure in the rain phenomenon. However, the term "rain area" is more appropriate when the number of peaks within these entities is not taken into consideration as a classification cri terion [9] . In this paper, where the interest is in the effects of rain on radio-communication systems, the term "cell" is used, as many others have done in the past when referring to this issue [9, 12, 15, 17-20]. Rain cells are basically defined in two different ways in the literature. The first definition is as the region inside a given con tour with a local reflectivity peak, where the reflectivity values inside the region are greater than a given threshold that is a func tion of the peak value. Examples include -10 dB in [10], -6 dB in [21], and -3 dB in [22]. Second, the cell consists of a region within which the intensity, R (or the reflectivity, Z), is greater than or equal to a fixed threshold, r [11, 16,23-25]. In this paper, we use the second definition, and neglect the rain intensity below the threshold, r . The modeling of rain cells must take into consideration their geometric shape and their horizontal intensity distribution. Circular cell models, where the diameter is equal to that of an equivalent circle of the same area, and a uniform-rate horizontal distribution, were proposed in [26-29]. Circular-cell models with horizontal distributions including uniform, exponential, and Gaussian were assumed in [30-31] . A circular-cell model with Gaussian horizon tal rain-rate distribution was proposed in [32-35]. In [9, 15, 36-42], the shape of the cell was described by means of an equivalent ellipse, the parameters of which are the semi-major and semi-minor axes, and the ellipse's orientation. The horizontal distribution of the intensity was characterized by means of a uniform function [36], an exponential function [15, 37, 40, 42], a Gaussian function [41], or a combination of the last two [9]. In the literature, rain cells are also classified into two catego ries as a function of the horizontal distribution of the intensity within them: "stratiform cells," with a gentle decay from the center with a maximum rate below 10 mm h -I , and "convective cells," which show areas of intense rain, greater than 10 mm h -I [43-45]. Moreover, convective cells are generally surrounded by a strati form area of lower intensity. 2.1 Modeling the Horizontal Structure of Rain Cells The rain fields observed in each weather-radar image into rain cells that can be identified by applying the algoritm cussed in Section 4. Each identified cell is then modele.:: parameterized using a mathematical description. In this stue; rain-cell models have been tested: EXCELL and HYCELL. characteristics are summarized below. Capsoni et al. [15] proposed the EXCELL model to c," the horizontal structure of rain cells by means of an ellipse rate, R, that exponentially decays around a single analytic expression for the horizontal distribution of R cell in the horizontal plane (Oxy) follows the expression 2 J1/2] R(X,y)=REexPr- [
2 ,R?:.R2 , L where RE is the peak intensity, and aE and bE are the along the Ox and Oy axes for which the peak decays by a :"1:, 1/e. R2 is the minimum value considered (Figure 1). The ::,; mulation of the model was valid for a value of R2 5 mm h- I [15]. Later, this value was extended by Awak3. 0.4 mm h- I , and by Goldhirsh [40] to 0.5 mm h- I . In sis, we have set the minimum level to 1.01 mm h- I (23. 8 example of a rain cell using the EXCELL model is ilh.;,::--, Figure 2. As discussed above, in the EXCELL model a cell is : characterized by means of the three parameters in R E , aE, and bE' The parameter R2 remains cons!c: parameters must be estimated on a cell-by-cell basis, ane : rion used for such estimation [15] involves minimizing :::e .. rain-intensity error between the actual and the modeled by Equation (2): (REI -II, S= I(Rr I - - - - . ----r------, ---,-------- sol R 45 40 35 E 30 "'
25 a: c "m a: 15 10' ot
-8 -2 0 Oistance X tk..rn, Figure 1. The EXCELL model: t he --ertical pl aoe Ox axis. The vertical axis is r ain r:ne in mmb: t axis is distance in km. JEEE .. E..-.: 118 The analytical expression for the distribution of rain rate within the cell in the horizontal plane (Oxy) of the HYCELL model is described by X DislmCe!km) of an EXCELL rain cell with the aE = 1.67 km, bE = 3.34 km, and ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ ~ J I -4 -2 0 Dislance X (km ) __ The HYCELL model: the vertical plane along the Ox is the EXCELL-modeled rain-intensity mean value, - the mean measured intensity in the cell. EX CELL model is extensively used. However, it pre .e shortcomings. In the original model, the cell intensity zero at infinity. To overcome this problem, a modified ver e model, called "lowered EXCELL," was developed. This --:e rain-intensity profile to reach a zero intensity value at a -.ance from the center [6, 46]. - ' :her shortcoming of this model is that the horizontal .)n of intensity in the vicinity of the peak does not in real _ abruptly as an exponential function. It seems more real _se a Gaussian function for the higher intensity values in -"'f of the cell. Feral et al. [9] defined a model similar to -=.. to overcome this issue. In the HYCELL model, the hori m cture is also elliptical, while the vertical profile follows .: Gaussian-exponential law (Figure 3). From a conceptual " \ iew, the Gaussian component describes the convective _': the cell (area of elevated rates), while the exponential ent characterizes the stratifonn region that surrounds it. ="'ents the peak from taking on values that are too high, ......' ., .. <0' " with those recorded by the radar. -ennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, October 2010 (3) where the parameters R G , aG, and b G define the Gaussian component. Respectively, they are the peak of the rain intensity, and the distances along the Ox and Oy axes for which the rain rate decays by a factor of l/e with respect to RG _ Similarly, the parameters R E , aE, and bE define the exponential part as in the EXCELL model. R J is the crossover point between the Gaussian and the exponential regions_ The validly domain for this hybrid model is R ;:o: R 2 , with R2 = I mm h- 1 . The value of R2 is in line with the threshold of 1.0 I mm h - 1 used in the analysis presented here. In the EXCELL model, one cell is completely characterized by means of three parameters, R E , aE' and bE' However, the HYCELL model requires seven parameters, i.e., R G , aG' b G , R E , aE, bE' and R I . These parameters have to be estimated on a cell-by-cell basis. The criterion used here in this analysis is the same as that used in [9], where the error, S, is minimized. This error is defined as follows: that is, the sum of the absolute values of the nonnalized rain-inten sity mean value, \ R), the root-mean-square value, ( R2 ) , the mean, \ C), and the root-mean-square value, (c 2 ), of the horizon tal rain-intensity gradient. Subscripts r and H refer to the radar image and the HYCELL model, respectively. Three special cases can be distinguished in the HYCELL model, as a function of the relative value of R J : a hybrid model , when R2 < R1 < RG ; a purely exponential model, when R J = RG = RE (in this case, the HYCELL model is the same as the EXCELL model) ; and a purely Gaussian model , when R1 = R 2 . In the last two cases, one cell is fully defined by only three parame ters: R E , aE , and bE' or R G , aG, and b G , respectively . In the analysis performed, HYCELL model parameterization of rain cells was only carried out using the purely exponential and purely Gaussian special cases. This decision was made because the cells in this study will be used at a later stage in a space-time dynamic model, where rain fields will move according to gi ven advection laws. In this extension, related to the one in Feral et al. [9], the idea is to work on rain cells the parameters of which change in time as they move through the simulation scenario. To do this, it is very convenient to reduce the complexity of the vari ous elements used in the overall modeling. 119 3. Experimental Data The data used in this research were weather-radar images provided by the meteorological radar that the Spanish Meteoro logical Agency (AEMET) owns at Cerceda (Figure 4), on the northwest coast of Spain (43.1690 N, 8.5261 W). The climatic characteristics in this area correspond to a temperate maritime cli mate, subjected to frequent frontal systems arriving from the Atlantic Ocean. These weather-radar images corresponded to plan position indicator (PP!) images from a C-band Doppler weather radar. The images contained reflectivity (Z) values in d8Z, where 6 Z = 10 loglo (z), with z in mm mm-3. The space resolution of the data was 1 km x I km, while the time resolution was 10 min [47). Table I summarizes the radar parameters. The radar reflectivity, z 3 (mm 6 mm- ), was converted into rain rate, R (mm h- I ) . Several empirical Z-R conversion relationships are available in the litera ture [48). The expression Z = 238R I5 is considered by the opera tors, the AEMET, as the most appropriate for the type of rain seen by this radar. . The data were corrected (attenuation, clutter, beam-blockage compensations), and a 121 km x 12 I km region inside the weather radar images was selected. Finally, the data were transformed for convenience into pseudo-reflectivity units (pZ), to work with a limited number of discrete integer values of reflectivity (0 to 127) [47]. The conversion rule was as follows: 0, Zs12.8d8Z pZ= 10(Z-12.8)/4, 12.8 < Zs63.6dBZ (5) 127, Z;?: 63.6 dBZ 1 The initial database consisted of corrected 121 km x 121 km weather-radar images, recorded every 10 minutes from November 2003 to April 2008. From this data set, weather-radar images with a significant rain geographical extent and a duration of several hours were selected. This selection was performed according to [29], based on the "rain coverage" in each weather-radar image. The rain coverage is defined as the percentage of pixels in the weather-radar image with rain intensity above or equal to a given threshold with respect to the total number of pixels in the weather radar image. For this work, a threshold of 18 pZ (19.8 dBZ, 0.54 mm h- I ) was established to separate dry pixels from wet pix els. The whole procedure of data selection is described next. Table 1. The general characteristics of Cerceda's weather radar. General Characteristics Latitude 43 10' I" N Longitude 8 31' I" W Height 608 m asl Wavelength 5.33 cm (C-band) D0I!E!ler-Mode Characteristics Pulse width 0.5 Scan elevation 0.5 0 Pulse repetition rate (PRR) 900 Hz-1200 Hz Main lobe width 0.92 Observation range 120 km Space resolution I x I km 2 10 min I Figure 4a. The location of weather radars throughout [ The location ofCerceda's weather radar is marked by 01 Apr 2005 1704 UTe Figure 4b. An example of a weather-radar . Cerceda's weather radar. -' =J- ' 03 fl' \ 02 . . . . . j' \ __ 0.1 .. ... .. . . .\ " ! .. -- , o /- - -- =====:- '2- - - ... ... Figure 5 . .-\n exa mple of the co\erage and age 11[" :: 6-: _ _-: 120 - : ..- ents" were identified as a function of their coverage: .-: started when, in the image, the raincoverage time .up a given threshold, and ended when it crossed =- eshold. The "event duration" or "lifetime" was the .' between these two crossing points. To avoid small 3! the edges of the coverage threshold - which cause ncations of very-small-duration rain events - a peration was performed on the coverage time series. ',n consisted in a running mean of the last seven points i.e. , an average of the coverage in the last hour. ____""-""on was only done when at least five of the seven images were available. Otherwise, coverage not available. Here, a threshold of 10% for the _, '. erage was set for identifying events. Figure 5 shows a coverage time series before and after smoothing \Iarch 25, 2008). .ing the selection method described above, a set of 267 _ initially identified. After the smoothing step, only 196 _ _ for further analysis. From these events, 101 .' a lifetime of over three hours - were selected. For concentrated on those events that did not exceed a _: ncoverage value of 22%. Finally, 25 events were thus - slUdy. 4. Identification of Rain Cells step in modeling rain cells consisted of the : :1 of all cells within each weather-radar image. The .. algorithm presented in this paper only used the \ alues to define rain cells. The algorithm developed - 10 a group of algorithms [21, 23, 25, 49-54] used for ::-precipitation-forecast (QPF) methods. These algo a rain cell as a contiguous region that exceeds a cer .... ity threshold and outranges a certain minimum size. .;'.<: specific algorithmic method differs from algorithm -:. A brief description of these procedures was given in _:OUT [50, 51], a rain cell is defined as such if pixels a certain reflectivity threshold directly touch. _:E [21] determines rain cells by drawing a contour con : 6 dB below each enclosed reflectivity maximum. ::1 employs a mass-centroid approach, with a single :. t is chosen by the user. SC1T [52] uses a mass-cen with seven thresholds (30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, . define rain cells. TRACE3D [53] applies a first thresh .:: the weather-radar image into "clusters." Within each _ second threshold, which depends on the maximum . in the cluster, is then used to define rain cells belonging - er. In [25] and [54], the identification of the rain cells ---;ned by searching for the maximum reflectivity, adding pixels (if their values were above a certain threshold), ' ::, the number of cells (by merging them if the distance . ;-nate, or removing them if their area did not exceed a - -,mum size). - , work, a hierarchical three-level rain-intensity structure : <:red . The lowest level corresponded to rain cells that d into clusters (second level), which, in tum, were --::0 rain events (third level). Rain-rate-threshold criteria 10 define the cells and clusters. In tum, events were on the coverage method described in Section 3. as and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, October 2010 A cluster into a given weather-radar image of a rain event was defined as the region made up of pixels with a reflectivity, Z, that was higher than or equal to a fixed threshold of 18 pZ (19.8 dBZ, 0.54 mm h- I ). This threshold was the same used previ ously to separate dry from wet pixels in a given weather-radar image to calculate its coverage. A rain cell within a cluster was defined as the pixel region with pixel reflectivity, Z, that was higher than or equal to a fixed threshold of 28 pZ (23.8 dBZ, 1.0 I mm h - J). However, rain-cell identification within a weather radar image is not always an easy task, as it might seem from the above criteria, and several additional operations were required. The following is a description of the algorithm used for identifying the rain cells for each weather-radar image. This description will be illustrated by an example for better under standing (Figure 6). The example corresponds to a 40 km x 16 km region, part of a weather-radar image from the database (Fig ure 6a). The rain-cell identification algorithm ran as follows: I. First, "groups of pixels" with reflectivity values higher than or equal to 28 pZ (23.8 dBZ, 1.01 mm h- I ) were identified. A group was understood as a contiguous area. In Figure 6b, five groups were identified, and they are shown in different colors. 2. Next, " pixel subgroups" with reflectivity values higher than or equal to 55 pZ (34.6 dBZ, 5.28 mm h -I) inside the previous group were determined. If only one sub group within a group existed, then the whole group was considered as an "initially isolated cell." In other cases, pixels that did not belong to any subgroup (pixels with values between 28 pZ and 54 pZ) were associated with the closest subgroup. The closest subgroup was the one with a center of mass that was the closest to the pixel under consideration. In the example, only the largest group contained several - in this case, three - sub groups (Figure 6c) . 3. After the above operation, it could happen that a sub group was formed by more than one pixel aggregate (the black subgroup in Figure 6c was made up of three pixel aggregates). To avoid this situation, it was checked that each subgroup contained only one aggre gate. If not, the following steps were performed: a. First , the "main aggregate" (the one with the maximum number of pixels fulfilling p Z 55) was identified, and this aggregate was considered as the subgroup. b. Then, each pixel from the other subgroup aggre gates was assigned to a different subgroup next to the aggregate to which it belonged. If there were several subgroups next to the aggregate, then the pixel was assigned to the subgroup with the clos est pixel. c. The process was repeated until there was only one aggregate in each subgroup. In the example, the black initial subgroup obtained for the group with the larger area (Figure 6c) was corrected through this process. Resulting subgroups are shown in Figure 6d. 121 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Figure 6. The sequence of operations for the rain-cell identification algorithm. These subgroups from each group were now considered 7. Initial grouped cells with an area smaller than 8 L "initial grouped cells." [n a previous step, groups with a became part of one of the grouped cells with whi.: unique subgroup were already considered initial iso was in contact. None of the three grouped cells ir. lated cells. Figure 6e shows the "initial cells" identified example satisfied this condition (Figure 6g). in the example. 8. Rain cells with an area smaller than 8 km 2 4. Next, initial isolated cells in contact with the image bor removed (Figure 6h). ders and with an area smaller than 8 km 2 (eight pixels) were removed. [n the example, the lowest left cell of 9. Finally, all the cells in contact with the image Figure 6e was removed (Figure 6f). and with an area smaller than 12 km 2 were remc' None of the three grouped cells in the example sa!:, 5. Then, each remaining initial isolated cell with an area this condition (Figure 6h). smaller than 8 km 2 was merged with its closest cell in a three-pixel distance. Otherwise, the cell was kept The resulting weather-radar image, after applying unaltered. [n the example, the lowest centered cell of cell identification algorithm, is shown in Figure 6i. Figure 6f became part of the one just above it (Fig ure 6g). This algorithm was applied to the 25 selected e\e-..: ther rain-cell parameterization. It must be borne in mine :: 6. Each isolated cell after this operation was merged, if it the definitions and criteria used - i.e., rain cells with pl _ existed, to the neighboring cell with a center of mass less than 5 km from the center of mass of the isolated clusters with pZ 2 18 - once cells were identified, cell. Otherwise, the cell remained unaltered. None of resided within clusters; however, clusters could exist '.' : the two isolated cells in the example satisfied this con cells. In this case, they were considered clusters that w dition (Figure 6g). or driving away, and they were not used in this study. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, NO.5. 122 Table 2. A summary of all 25 events selected for analysis. I I I I 1'1 [ vent Date Time WRIs d Total Total I 01 DEC 2003 [07:14,13:241 38 443
18 DEC 2003 [08:24, 13 :34J 32 500 - , 20 JUN 2004 [ 18:04, 21:341 22 252 .! 13 JAN 2005 [03: 14, 06:44] 22 135 5 15 JAN 2005 [04:14,12: 14] 49 324 6 05 FEB 2005 [10:24,13:541 22 163 - 26 MAR 2005 [19:24,23:24] 25 414 8 01 APR 2005 [16:54,21 :54] 31 215 9 15 APR 2005 [08:44, 14:341 36 563 :0 23 APR 2005 [01 :04, 05:14] 26 280 il 14 MAY 2005 [08:04, II :541 24 315 :1 17 OCT 2005 [03:44,07:04] 21 135 !3 27 NOV 2005 [01 :34, 11 :24J 60 670 02 DEC 2005 [07:54,14:341 41 413 15 02 DEC 2005 [15:34,20:44] 32 466 16 31 DEC 2005 [15:24,23:141 48 589 ! 7 15 JAN 2006 [16:24,20:041 23 388 18 16 FEB 2006 [10:44,14:54] 26 223 19 15 APR 2006 [07:54, 12:041 26 322 20 16 APR 2006 [10:04,13:441 23 252 21 21 OCT 2006 [07:24,13:14] 36 257 01 DEC 2006 [07:34, II: 141 23 124
_.J 30 DEC 2006 [10:24, 13:34] 20 136 14 30 MAR 2007 [19:04,22:24] 21 235 25 27 FEB 2008 [04:44,08:041 21 135 Clusters Rain Cells Cells per Cluster Mean STD Total Mean STD Mean STD 11.66 3.06 785 20.66 5.63 1.77 1.61 15.63 5.09 934 29.19 6.03 1.87 2.06 11.45 4.94 386 17.55 5.07 1.53 1.16 6. 14 2.10 279 12.68 2.85 2.07 1.61 6.61 3.09 801 16.3 5 6.03 2.47 2.75 7.41 1.97 336 15.27 3.38 2.06 2.07 16.56 4.09 865 34.60 7.80 2.09 3.24 6.94 3.77 689 22.23 9.77 3.2 4.74 15.64 3.31 1090 30.28 6.92 1.94 2.17 10.77 3.22 608 23.38 6.66 2.17 2.26 13.13 2.66 664 27.67 5.79 2.11 2.01 6.43 2.50 243 11.57 3.72 1.8 1.39 11.17 3.72 1350 22.50 5.34 2.01 1.95 10.07 2.97 1138 27.76 8.46 2.76 3.29 14.56 3A9 855 26.72 6.41 1.83 2.17 12.27 2.56 1202 25.04 4.62 2.04 1.72 16.87 4.31 625 27.17 5.81 1.61 1.22 8.58 3.53 513 19.73 5.13 2.3 2.63 12.38 2.37 739 28.42 5.71 2.3 2.83 10.96 2.58 541 23.52 5.21 2.15 2.46 7. 14 2.52 675 18.75 6.01 2.63 3.65 5.39 2.27 266 11 .57 3.27 2. 15 1.99 6.80 1.99 247 12.35 2.74 1.82 IAI 11.19 3.14 506 24.10 6.97 2.15 3.04 6A3 1.69 282 13.43 4.93 2.09 1.70 : "rovides a summary of the number of clusters and -=" in each one of the 25 events in our database, fol considerations and criteria. In this table, for ;..,-:e total number of identified clusters, the average :. ;.he standard deviation per weather-rad\lr image, as _ e:age number and standard deviation of the cells per :- ":5 listed. Additionally, in the same table, we indicate - date, and time, and the total number of weather _= of which it consists. From Table 2, it could be the average number of clusters per weather-radar :-::ween SA and 16.9, the average number of cells per ......= image was between 11.6 and 34.6, and the average per cluster was between 1.53 and 3.20. ain-Cell Model Parametrization -:-sent the results of thi s study in this section. The ratio _ ;:1 [9], was used for quantitatively comparing the d ing results. The ratio .lml-m2 between cell parame for two given models, ml and m2, is defined as (6) _-,J! ratio between the sums of the errors of the statistics :. . (G), and (G 2 ) - of each model with respect to -easurements, r. These integral parameters of the cell are the mean, (R), and root-mean-square, (R2) , values of the rain rate, R, and the mean, (G), and root-mean-square, ( G 2 ), values of the horizontal gradient of R. If .l m l-m2 is greater than one, then Model 2 is better than Modell, and vice versa. First, following the steps given in [9] for two populations of rain cells - one in Bordeaux, France, and another in Karlsruhe, Germany - the EXCELL (ex), pure exponential HYCELL (he), and pure Gaussian HYCELL (hg) models were parameterized for a population of rain cells on the northwest coast of Spain. For greater reliability, modeled rain cells with a minor axis for the ellipse smaller than 2 km, a major axis larger than 50 km, or those cells in contact with the borders of the image were excluded. Then, the ratios .lex-he' .lex-hg' and .lhe-hg were computed. Finally, for each ratio, the mean value for each event was calculated (Table 3). Moreover, from the he and hg models, a different analysis was done. This new analysis (heg) consisted in selecting for each cell the best model (he or hg). Table 3 also shows the mean value of the ratio .lex- heg for each event, and the percentage of cases for each event where the he and hg models were obtained as the best models in heg modeling. For each ratio, the last row of Table 3 shows the mean value for the total set of 25 events selected. Results indicated that the he and hg models behaved generally better than the ex model. The heg results were much better than the he or hg with respect to the ex model. This better parameterization achieved with the heg model ing will then improve route diversity and site diversity for terres trial systems, for example. From this table, it could also be appre ciated in the heg modeling how cells were better described (higher percentage) using the hg instead of the he (heg model). Some "'_r-ao; and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No. 5, October 2010 123 table 3. A ratio comparison for the four models in the Results indicated that in general, on the northwest coast 0,0 25 selected events. the HYCELL models performed better than the EXCELL m Event Xer-he Xer-hg Xhe- hg Xex-heg heK Modeling # %he %hK I 1.87 2.77 1.24 2.94 46.21 53.79 2 2.20 3.32 1.29 3.51 39.43 60.57 3 1.96 2.69 1.22 2.85 41.97 58.03 4 1.15 1.22 0.98 1.39 70.89 29.11 5 1.43 1.80 1.10 1.99 54.55 45.45 6 1.36 1.52 1.00 1.72 63.16 36.84 7 2.08 2.97 1.26 3.14 35.97 64.03 8 2.15 3.08 1.22 3.30 45.40 54.60 9 2.24 3.35 1.31 3.53 38.54 61.47 10 1.86 2.56 1.18 2.74 48.03 51.97 II 2.31 3.56 1.34 3.74 38.48 61.52 12 1.47 1.66 1.04 1.86 53.30 46.70 13 2.07 3.03 1.27 3.21 40.45 59.55 14 2.36 3.61 1.37 3.78 32.87 67.1 3 15 2.20 3.25 1.27 3.45 41.32 58.68 16 2.14 3.04 1.26 3.23 37.37 62.63 17 2.09 3.05 1.23 3.24 40.92 59.08 18 1.77 2.37 1.16 2.56 46.01 53.99 19 2.14 3.15 1.27 3.34 40.90 59.10 20 1.80 2.52 1.19 2.72 48.2 1 51.79 21 1.73 2.26 1.13 2.46 51.80 48.20 22 1.53 1. 88 1.06 2.05 54.33 45.67 23 1.24 1.31 0.96 1.49 65 .98 34.02 24 1.71 2.28 1.13 2.46 47.93 52.07 25 1.1 8 1.20 0.94 1.36 68.18 31.82 Total 1.97 2.81 1.22 2.99 44.03 55.97 examples of rain cells fitted with the he and hg model s are shown in the appendix. 6. Summary We have presented results from a study that aimed to charac teri ze and model the rain fields from weather-radar images in the northwest coast of Spain. However, the approaches used here can be easily configured to be applicable to weather-radar observations of other climatic regions. Thi s work is part of an ongoing activity trying to develop dynamic space-time models of rain fields for simulating rain-induced effects on millimeter-wave communica tion systems [55, 56] . Rain identification and modeling are two of the building blocks in this research. The next steps will be focused on the development of a space-time model capable of reproducing the evolution of rain fields. Both simulation and nowcasting (short term prediction) are the envi saged applications. Moreover, further work could include growth and decay trends of rain cells to enhance their dynamics . Detailed modeling of these images according to two well known rain-cell models, EXCELL and HYCELL, has been per formed. For this modeling, rain events were first detected through a procedure based on coverage and rain-intensity criteria. An algo rithm for identifying rain cells within the images was then applied. 7. Ackno,,!,ledgment The authors would like to acknowledge the regional the Spanish State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) at providing the radar images. This research was partly carrie- the framework of the European Network of Excellence 8. Appendix Here, three examples of the he and hg model-fitted ,_ (Figures 7, 8, and 9) are shown. These three selected under the following cons iderations: I. Rain cells belonged to different events fo r each e:c pIe. 2. At least one example where the hg model was be:-: than the he model. 3. At least one example where the he model was than the hg model. In each of these examples, we show three two-dirr. images (the radar observation, the he-modeled cell, ani! modeled cell), as well as three three-dimensional view'so include a table for each example, summarizing the each model: R E , 0E , and bE, or R G , 0G, and b G . In these three parameters in both models are denoted as RH 0 b H , respectively. In these tables (Tables 4,5, and 6) we also compare' properties of the radar observation and the modeled These properties are the cell area for R2 =0 1.0 I mm h ellipticity factor, El; the cell-orientation angle, B; the rate, (R); its root-mean-square value, (R2); the mean gradient of R, (G); its root-Olean-square value, (G 2 ) : error, ,; , according to Equation (4). Note that parameters and B always take on the same values for both the he an': els. Each rain-cell shape from radar data or modele.: approached by an equivalent ellipse, the three shape which are the major-axi s length, the minor-axis length, aT. entation angle, B. These geometrical features are corr ........... minimization of the second moments of inertia. The e factor is defined as the ratio of the minor-to-major-axis Ie!' orientation, B, is taken between the major axis and the system. It thus takes on a value equal to 0 along the d the x axis, and increases in the counterclockwise sense. 124 " Q) '" Q. 1J a "t) Q) <Q Ol g: '" s: Q) 'g 5- 5 <
Ol -'" Z 0 '_Ol 0 0 s- a
'"
a
'" Ol > - I ...- . -' ... . ..
X (l<m) Y(km) X (km) I -.a__ U'''''' oj .. . ..". J: > 34. e {6.2II) oj " . . . ...... . .. 2S Y(km) 2S X (l<m) x(km) I > 2S Y (km) X (km) X (km) Figure 7. An example of he or hg modeling for one cell corresponding to event 12. The top row is the radar observation. The middle row is the he modeled cell. The bottom row is the hg modeled cell. " > r1 X (km) Y (km) X(km) ! > X(km) Y (km) X (km) ! > X(km) Y(km) X(km) Figure 8. An example of he or hg modeling for one cell corresponding to event 14. The top row is the radar observation. The middle row is the he modeled cell. The bottom row is the hg modeled cell. I > Y(km) X(km) x (km) I > 2!i Y(km) X(J<m) X(J<m) ~ > 20 Y(km) X(km) X(J<m) Figure 9. An example of he or hg modeling for one cell corresponding to event 19. The top row is the radar observation. The middle row is the he modeled cell. The bottom row is the hg modeled cell. Table 4. A comparison of modeling results for the cell in Figure 7. [mm' h'lj [kml [km 2 1 lmm,h" 'km"\ Immh"\ [1 2 () QH (R) RH or Rmox El ( R2) Ar (G) (G ) ~ b H 2,25 1.24 he 2.13 10.4 2.73 1.38 1.52 0.1 2 46 0.79 -56.7 1.65 2.83 2.45 2.84 1.37 1.43 0.30 Radar 6.3 hR - - 7.0 0.75 -44.9 2.27 2.65 1.38 1.65 35 Table 5. A comparison of modeling results for the cell in Figure 8. ..J [kmj fmmh" \ [km 2 ] [0] QH b H R,., or Rmax Ar El () (R) ( R2) (G) (G 2 ) ~ he 0.46 0.98 46.3 47 0.38 -12.3 4.57 7.74 4.34 6.08 0.27 hfZ 1.46 3.11 25.9 5.46 7.74 4.45 5.27 0.08 Radar - - 22.3 31 0.31 -11.0 5.45 7.80 4.35 5.54 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No. 5, O c t c : ~ 126 Table 6. A comparison of modeling results for the cell in Figure 9. [km] [mmh-'] [km 2 ] [0] [mmh- 1 1 (mmh- I km- 1 1 aH b H RH or Rmax Ar El e (R) (R2) (G) ( G 2 ) .; he
0.59 0.80 1.29 1.74 102.5 91.5 48 0.76 28_8 7.08 13.33 7.43 10.84 1.80 13.8 23.40 13 .34 17.21 0.19 Radar - 97.5 32 0.74 31.7 13.6 23.67 12.96 19.78 9. References I Radio Consultative Committee (CClR), " Recom -: and Reports of the CClR, Volume V, Propagation in -pd Media," CCfR 15th Plenary Assembly, Genoa, Italy, -= iliani, A. Paraboni, J. Lemorton, L. Castanet, L. Feral .. -usquet, "Short- and Mid-Term Prediction Techniques of :m Conditions from Weather Radar Observations. Appli Management in SATCOM Systems," Proceed . t: 2006 International Workshop on Satellite and Space :3tions, IWSSC2006, Leganes, Spain, September 2006,
::met, J. Lemorton, S. Bertorelli, C. Capsoni, F. Lacoste lartellucci, "Advanced Modelling of the Space-Time - of the Propagation Channel for Future Satcom Sys 'eedings of the First European Conference on Antennas EuCAP 2006, Nice, France, November 2006, pp. in, L. Feral, H. Sauvageot, L. Castanet, J. Lemorton and "Stochastic Spatio-Temporal Modelling of Rain _.. for Propagation Studies," Proceedings of the Second Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2007, UK, November 2007, pp. 1-6. ni, C. Capsoni, L. Luini and C. Riva, "An Enhanced . , he SC EXCELL Model Considering Cells Movement, " of the Second European Conference on Antennas and EuCAP 2007, Edinburgh, UK, November 2007, pp. - ni, L. Luini, A. Paraboni, C. Riva and A. Martellucci, Prediction Model of Rain Attenuation that Separately :-,)r Stratiform and Convective Rain, " IEEE Transactions Propagation, AP-57, I, January 2009, pp. 196-204. _ _-::. Multiexcell: A Large-Scale Rain Field Model for on Applications and its Experimentql Identification - . PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy, 2009, _ - : lita, M. D'Amico, 8 . Gremont, M. Hajny, F. S. T. Palade and C. Riva, " Rain Attenuation," in O. Fiser _-.ST Action 255 Final Report: Radiowave Propagation ;: for New Satcom Services at Ku-Band and Above, .:.' The Netherlands, ESA Publications Division, March -: 2: Fixed Propagation Modelling, Chapter 2.2, pp. 2.2.1 : Iwww.cost255.rl.ac.uklpart2.pdf. _.. H. Sauvageot, L. Castanet and J. Lemorton, "HYCELL :-Iybrid Model of the Rain Horizontal Distribution for Propagation Studies: I. Modeling ofthe Rain cal," Radio Science, 38,3, 1056, June 2003. 10. T. G. Konrad, "Statistical Models of Summer Rainshowers Derived from Fine-Scale Radar Observati ons," Journal ofApplied Meteorology, 17,2, February 1978, pp. 171-188. II. J. Goldhirsh and 8 . Musiani, " Rain Cell Size Statistics Derived from Radar Observations at Wallops Island, Virginia," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-24, 6, November 1986, pp. 947-954. 12. R. K. Crane, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Through Rain, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996, pp. 1-273. 13. F. Mesnard and H. Sauvageot, "Structural Characteristic of Rain Fields," Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, D 13, 4385, July 2003. 14. J. Goldhirsh and B. Musiani, "Dimension Statistics of Rain Cell Cores and Associated Rain Rate Isopleths Derived from Radar Measurements in the Mid-Atlantic Coast of the United States," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-30, I, January 1992, pp. 28-37. 15. C. Capsoni, F. Fedi, C. Magistroni, A. Paraboni and A. Pawl ina, "Data and Theory for a New Model of the Horizontal Structure of Rain Cells for Propagation Applications," Radio Sci ence, 22, 3, 1987, pp. 395-404. 16. H. Sauvageot, F. Mesnard and R. S. Tenorio, "The Relation between the Area-Average Rain Rate and the Rain Cell Distribu tion Parame'ters," Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 56, I, January 1999, pp. 57-70. 17. P. Misme and P. Waldteufel, "A Model for Attenuation by Pre cipitation on a Microwave Earth-Space Link," Radio Science, 15, 3,1980, pp. 655-665. 18. R. K. Crane, "A Two-Component Rain Model for the Predic tion of Attenuation Statistics," Radio Science, 17, 6, 1982, pp. 137 1-1387. 19. C. Capsoni, F. Fedi and A. Paraboni, "A Comprehensive Mete orologically Oriented Methodology for the Prediction of Wave Propagation Parameters in Telecommunication Applications beyond 10 GHz," Radio Science, 22, 3, 1987, pp. 387-393. 20. L. Feral, H. Sauvageot, L. Castanet and J. Lemorton, "HYCELL - A New Hybrid Model of the Rain Horizontal Distri bution for Propagation Studies: 2. Statistical Modeling of the Rain Rate Field," Radio Science, 38, 3, 1057, June 2003. _ 'laS and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, October 2010 127 21. P. 1. Bremaud and Y. B. Pointin, "Forecasting Heavy Rain from Cell Motion Using Radar," Journal of Hydrology, 142, 1-4, February 1993, pp. 373-389. 22. R. K. Crane and H. C. Shieh, "A Two-Component Rain Model for the Prediction of Site Diversity Performance," Radio Science, 24, 5, 1989, pp. 641-665. 23. M. Dixon and G. Wiener, "TITAN: Thunderstorm Identifica tion, Tracking Analysis and Nowcasting - A Radar-based Method ology," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 10, 6, December 1993, pp. 785-797. 24. G. Drufuca, "Radar-Derived Statistics on the Structure of Pre cipitation Patterns," Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16, 10, Octo ber 1977, pp. 1029-1035. 25. E. Morin, D. C. Goodrich, R. A. Maddox, X. Gao, H. V. Gupta and S. Sorooshian, "Spatial Patterns in Thunderstorm Rainfall Events and their Coupling with Watershed Hydrological Response," Advances in Water Resources, 29, 6, June 2006, pp. 843-860. 26. P. M. Eagleson, "The Distribution of Catchment Coverage by Stationary Rainstorms," Water Resources Research, 20, 5, 1984, pp. 581-590. 27. D. R. Cox and V. S. Isham, "A Simple Spatial-Temporal Model of Rainfall," Proceedings of the Royal Society: Mathemati cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 415, 1849, February 1988, pp.317-328. 28.1. B. Marco and 1. B. Valdes, "Partial Area Coverage Distribu tion for Flood Frequency Analysis in Arid Regions," Water Resources Research, 34, 9, 1998, pp. 2309-2317. 29. H. S. Wheater, V. S. Isham, D. R. Cox, R. E. Chandler, A. Kakou, P. 1. Northrop, L. Oh, C. Onof and I. Rodrfguez-lturbe, "Spatial-Temporal Rainfall Fields: Modelling and Statistical Aspects," Hydrology and Earth System Science, 4, 4, 2000, pp. 581-601. 30. I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, D. R. Cox and P. S. Eagleson, "Spatial Modelling of Total Storm Rainfall," Proceedings of the Royal Society: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 403, 1824, January 1986, pp. 27-50. 31. P. Eagleson, N. Fennessey, W. Qinliang and I. Rodriguez Iturbe, "Application of Spatial Poisson Models to Air Mass Thun derstorm Rainfall," Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 08, 1987, pp. 9661-9678. 32. 1. Goldhirsh and E. 1. Walsh, "Rain Measurements from Space Using a Modified Seasat-Type Radar Altimeter, " IEEE Transac tions on Antennas Propagation, AP-30, 4, July 1982, pp. 726-733. 33. D. E. Barrick and B. 1. Lipa, "Analysis and Interpretation of Altimeter Sea Echo," Advances in Geophysics, 27, 1985, pp. 61 100. 34. J. Testud, P. Amayenc, X. Dou and T. Tani , "Tests of Rain Profiling Algorithms for a Spaceborne Radar Using Raincell Mod els and Real Data Precipitation Fields," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 13, 2, April 1996, pp. 426-453. 35.1. Tournadre, "Determination of Rain Cell Characteristics from the Analysis of TOPEX Altimeter Echo Waveforms," Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15, 2, April 1998, ;-: 406. 36. P. Northrop, "A Clustered Spatial-Temporal Model l': faJI," Proceedings of the Royal Society: Mathematical. and Engineering Sciences, 454, 1975, July 1998, pp. 1875- : 37. 1. Awaka, "A Three-Dimensional Rain Cell Model Study of Interference due to Hydrometer Scattering," Jo. the Communications Research Laboratory, 36, 147, Marc" pp. 13-44. 38. A. Pawl ina and M. Binaghi, "Radar Rain Intensity t . Ground Level: New Parameters for Propagation Impairm<O" diction in Temperature Regions, " Proceedings of the Commission F Open Symposium on Wave Propaga . Remote Sensing, Ahmedabad, India, November 1995, pp. : 39. L. Feral, F. Mesnard, H. Sauvageot, L. Castane: Lemorton, "Rain Cell Shape and Orientation Distribution ir West of France," Physics and Chemistry of the Earth . .= Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 25, 10- I 2, October :: 1073-1078. 40. J. Goldhirsh, "Two-Dimension Visualization of IU Structures," Radio Science, 35, 3,2000, pp. 713-729. 41. P. Willems, "A Spatial Rainfall Generator for Sma:: Scales," Journal of Hydrology, 252, 1-4, October 200 I. ; 144. 42. J. von Hardenberg, L. Ferraris and A. Provenzale, "n _ of Convective Rain Cells," Geophysical Research Lellen, 2280, December 2003. 43. A. Pawlina, "Essential Knowledge of Rain Structure [ Applications based on Available Data and Models," of 3rd Regional Workshop on Radio Communication j RADIO AFRICA'99, Gaborone, Botswana, October 1999 44. D. Rosenfeld, E. Amitai and D. B. Wolff, "Classi fi. Rain Regimes by the Three Dimensional Properties of Re Fields," Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34, I, January 198-211. 45. E. Matricciani and A. Pawlina, "Statistical Characte: Rainfall Structure and Occurrence for Convective and Rain Inferred from Long Term Point Rain Rate Data," P of Millennium Conference on Antennas and Propagation. - Davos, Switzerland, April 2000. 46. C. Capsoni , L. Luini, A. Paraboni and C. Riva, "Stra Convective Rain Discrimination Deduced from Local P Transactions on Antennas Propagation, AP-54, II , , 2006,pp.3566-3569. 47. A. Nunez, V. Pastoriza, P. Marino, F. P. Fontan Fiebig, "A Space-Time Model for Reproducing R;!. Dynamics," Proceedings of the Second European Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2007, Edinburgh, L i\... ber 2007, pp. 1-6. 48.1. A. Smith and W. F. Krajewski, "A Modeling Stue: fall Rate-Reflectivity Relationships," Water Resources . 29,8, 1993,pp. 2505-2514. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, Ocr.: 128 : :;; Ienburg, A. Jurczyk, J. Szturc and K. Osrodka, "Quan --c:-:: ipitation Forecasts (QPF) based on Radar Data for '" : al Models," COST 717: Use of Radar Observations in . and NWP Models, Working group: 1-8, Working - WDF_01_200203_2, March 2002; http://www.smhi.se/ _ 01_200203 _2.pdf. :. -:31t, T. Denoeux and G. Jacquet, "A Radar Rainfall - :vtethod Designed for Hydrological Purposes," Journal <r" 114,3-4, May 1990, pp. 229-244. - alt, T. Denoeux, and G. Jacquet. "The Development of _ > ILO Rainfall Forecasting Method," in L D. Cluckie and .r (eds.), Hydrological Applications of Weather Radar, Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1991, pp. 359-367. . nson, P. L. MacKeen, A. Witt, E. DeWayne Mitchell, -.pf, M. D. Eilts and K. W. Thomas, "The Storm Cell and Tracking Algorithm: an Enhanced WSR-88D .. Weather and Forecasting, 13, 2, June 1998, pp. 263 . werker, "Cell Tracking with TRACE3D - A New _.. Atmospheric Research, 61, I, January 2002, pp. 15 _.:eer, "A Short Term Radar Rainfall Forecasting Proce "h Resolution Radar Data," Physics and Chemistry of Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 24, 8, 9, pp. 879-882 . ..;.oriza, Space-Time Modeling for the Simulation and :: of Rain Fields through Image Processing Techniques ata, PhD Thesis, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain, pp. 1-134 (in Spanish). _-.ariza, A. Nunez, F. Machado, P. Marino, F. P. Fontan _ Fi ebig, "Combining Meteorological Radar and Network . uges Data for Space-Time Model Development," Inter ';mrnal of Satellite Communications Systems and Net ::: blished online (early view), September 2009. ucing the Feature Article Authors ote Pastoriza was born in Bueu, Pontevedra, Spain, in received the MS degree in Industrial Engineering and the _ from the University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain, in 1998 and :>cctively. In 2000 he joined the Electronic Technology . University of Vigo, as an Associate Professor; since as been an Assistant Professor there. He is an IEEE ric is currently a researcher with the Digital Communi - 0 Instrumentation Group (TE3), University of Vigo. His ch activities are in the fields of atmospheric propaga ': D communication systems, signal processing, and com _ mtelligence, and their application in decision making modeling. as and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No.5, October 2010 Adolfo Nunez Fernandez was born in Vigo, Spain, in 1975. He is studying mathematics at the University of Santiago de Com postela (USC), Spain. Since 2003, he has worked in channel mod eling for satellite communications in the Signal Theory and Com munications Department of the Telecommunications Engineering School of the University of Vigo, Spain. In 2004, he was a guest researcher at the Institute of Communications and Navigation at DLR (German Aerospace Research), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany. His current research interests are channel modeling for satellite and mobile radio links . - Perfecto Marino received the PhD degree in Telecommunications Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain, in 1984. From 1978 to 1993, he was an Associ ate Professor in the Electronic Technology Department, University of Vigo, Spain. In 1988, he was a Visiting Scientist in the Com puter Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Since 1993, he has been a full Professor in the Elec tronic Technology Department, University of Vigo. His main research interests include distributed electronic instrumentation, wireless sensor networks, fieldbus technology for industrial control, and artificial vision. He has authored more than 20 articles in national and international technical journals, coau thored 12 books, and published more than 100 papers in interna tional conferences. He was technical co-chair for such international conferences as IECON, ISlE, SIECI, CAIP, CONTROLO, SAAEI, and evaluator of several journals, such as Mechatronics, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, CIT, ESIME, Elsevier, and others. He has been involved in more than 40 research and applied projects for several national enterprises, such as Citroen, Televes, Ence, Union Fenosa, Anfaco, Castrosua, and others. He holds a European patent on distributed instrumentation for power transformers (2005). He is also the Director of the Digital Communications Division of the Electronic Technology Department, University of Vigo. He has been distinguished as an Expert on Information Technology from the Commission of the European Union for the SPRINT (Luxem bourg, 1991); COPERNICUS (Brussels, 1994); and ACTS (Brus sels, 2002) programs. He has served as General Manager of the Information Society (2002-2004) and Communications Technol ogy (2002-2006) programs from the State R&D Office (Autono mous Government, Galicia, Spain). He is also an expert from the R&D National Program (Ministry of Education and Science, Madrid) in the evaluation of research projects in the field of infor mation and communication technologies. He is an IEEE Senior Member. 129