Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Changing Time On Rambus'S Motion To Strike Manufacturers' Motions For Summary Judgment of Invalidity (MSJ No. 1 and MSJ No. 2)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2530 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 5

1 [Parties Listed on Signature Page]


2

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW
11
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
12 ORDER CHANGING TIME ON
vs. RAMBUS’S MOTION TO STRIKE
13 MANUFACTURERS’ MOTIONS FOR
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
14 (MSJ NO. 1 AND MSJ NO. 2)
Defendants.
15 Trial Date: January 19, 2009
Courtroom: 6
16 Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
17 RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-02298 RMW
18 Plaintiff,
19 vs.
20 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
et al.,
21
Defendants.
22

23 RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW


24 Plaintiff,
25 vs.
26 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,
27 Defendants.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6320444.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2530 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 2 of 5

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER


2 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to reschedule the hearing date for Daubert
3 motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008, to the afternoon of December 11, 2008,
4 and filed a filed a joint stipulation and proposed order seeking approval for that agreement on
5 November 7, 2008;
6 WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that
7 Rambus may file a motion to strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment of
8 Invalidity No. 1 and Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2 on shortened time so that
9 it may be heard on the same date as the motions that are the subject of the motion to strike, which,
10 subject to court approval, is December 11, 2008;
11 NOW therefore, it is hereby AGREED and STIPULATED, by and among the
12 parties hereto through their undersigned counsel, that the hearing date and briefing scheduling for
13 Rambus’s Motion to Strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1 and Motion
14 for Summary Judgment No. 2 shall be as follows:
15 1. November 12, 2008: Deadline to file opening brief;
16 2. November 26, 2008: Deadline to file opposition;
17 3. December 4, 2008: Deadline to file reply;
18 4. December 11, 2008, at 2:00 p.m.: Hearing on Rambus’s Motion to Strike
19 the Manufacturers’ Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 1 and
20 Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2.
21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
22 DATED: ________________________ ______________________________
23 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6320444.1
-1- CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2530 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 3 of 5

1
DATED: November 10, 2008 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
2
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
3
McKOOL SMITH P.C.
4

5
By: /s/
6 ROSEMARIE T. RING

7 Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.

8 DATED: November 10, 2008 THEODORE BROWN III


TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND
9 CREW LLP
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
10 THELEN LLP

11

12
By /s/
13 THEODORE BROWN III

14 Attorneys for HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR


INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR
15 AMERICA INC., HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
16 AMERICA INC., HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX
17 SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND
GmbH
18
SVEN RAZ
DATED: November 10, 2008
19 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

20

21 By: /s/
SVEN RAZ
22
Attorneys for MICRON TECHNOLOGY
23 INC., et. al.

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6320444.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2530 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 4 of 5

1 ROBERT BEREZIN
DATED: November 10, 2008 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
2

3
By: /s/
4 ROBERT BEREZIN
5 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
6 AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND SAMSUNG
7 AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.
8
THERESA E. NORTON
9 DATED: November 10, 2008 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
10

11
By: /s/
12 THERESA E. NORTON
13 Attorneys for NANYA TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION and NANYA
14 TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA
15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6320444.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2530 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 5 of 5

1 Filer’s Attestation:
2 I, Rosemarie T. Ring am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
3 to file this STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE. In
4 compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Theodore Brown III, Sven Raz,
5 Robert Berezin and Theresa Norton concur in this filing.
6
By: /s/
7 ROSEMARIE T. RING
8

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6320444.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

You might also like